Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Err, they did a minute's silence for Rosa Parks at the Glasgow show- you could do a shout out then- I don't think that would be considerd innapropriate at all Jason On 22 Nov 2005, at 14:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November *cue alex making a £50 bet that he can get on radio 1 by shouting something absoloutely ridiculous at a quiet un-editable point* _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Mike personally doesn't give two hoots about being on Radio One but he has a lot of mouths to feed and the main reason for this tour is to help feed those mouths and increase general public perception of UR- he DOES care about those people and so I can't see any reason why he would veto or morally object to a radio broacast of this kind- if Mike was doing things on his own terms for this tour then A: it would never happen because he hates touring and B: He would be playing at Club 69, T-Funkshun, Traffic and other small clubs across the world and not meat markets like The Arches, Shine etc etc cheers Jason On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:14, Martin Dust wrote: On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:59, Dan Bean wrote: True, but not everyone can get to Liverpool + a Breezeblock session would introduce them to a new (and v. young) audience. Whether you think they should be reaching a wider audience is another story, though my impression is that UR themselves wish to do so. Mike does things on his own terms as far as I can tell and probably wouldn't give two sh1ts about being on Radio 1... m
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
I wasn't really disagreeing Jason but hasn't he said no to the radio thing or have I got hold of the wrong end of the stick? I was merely pointing out that I could understand why he'd/probably say no... On 23 Nov 2005, at 08:39, Jason Brunton wrote: Mike personally doesn't give two hoots about being on Radio One but he has a lot of mouths to feed and the main reason for this tour is to help feed those mouths and increase general public perception of UR- he DOES care about those people and so I can't see any reason why he would veto or morally object to a radio broacast of this kind- if Mike was doing things on his own terms for this tour then A: it would never happen because he hates touring and B: He would be playing at Club 69, T-Funkshun, Traffic and other small clubs across the world and not meat markets like The Arches, Shine etc etc cheers Jason On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:14, Martin Dust wrote: On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:59, Dan Bean wrote: True, but not everyone can get to Liverpool + a Breezeblock session would introduce them to a new (and v. young) audience. Whether you think they should be reaching a wider audience is another story, though my impression is that UR themselves wish to do so. Mike does things on his own terms as far as I can tell and probably wouldn't give two sh1ts about being on Radio 1... m
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Dan knows... (I don't think he's said no outright. Isn't the possible appearance simply being pushed back till sometime next year?) -Original Message- From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 November 2005 11:18 To: Jason Brunton Cc: 313 Mailinglist List Subject: Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR I wasn't really disagreeing Jason but hasn't he said no to the radio thing or have I got hold of the wrong end of the stick? I was merely pointing out that I could understand why he'd/probably say no... On 23 Nov 2005, at 08:39, Jason Brunton wrote: Mike personally doesn't give two hoots about being on Radio One but he has a lot of mouths to feed and the main reason for this tour is to help feed those mouths and increase general public perception of UR- he DOES care about those people and so I can't see any reason why he would veto or morally object to a radio broacast of this kind- if Mike was doing things on his own terms for this tour then A: it would never happen because he hates touring and B: He would be playing at Club 69, T-Funkshun, Traffic and other small clubs across the world and not meat markets like The Arches, Shine etc etc cheers Jason On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:14, Martin Dust wrote: On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:59, Dan Bean wrote: True, but not everyone can get to Liverpool + a Breezeblock session would introduce them to a new (and v. young) audience. Whether you think they should be reaching a wider audience is another story, though my impression is that UR themselves wish to do so. Mike does things on his own terms as far as I can tell and probably wouldn't give two sh1ts about being on Radio 1... m
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
You wrote: Dan knows... (I don't think he's said no outright. Isn't the possible appearance simply being pushed back till sometime next year?) Hopefully, we'll have to wait and see though.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
If they could get anywhere close to the last radio interview he did, that would be cool as I think that has to be one of the best insights ever and still gets loads of plays at dust towers... On 23 Nov 2005, at 11:37, Dan Bean wrote: You wrote: Dan knows... (I don't think he's said no outright. Isn't the possible appearance simply being pushed back till sometime next year?) Hopefully, we'll have to wait and see though.
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November -Original Message- From: Klaas-Jan Jongsma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 14:38 To: 313 Mailinglist List Subject: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR I don't know which funster on here recently said that Laurent Garnier was just as boring as Carl Cox but last Saturday mr. Garnier played a pretty impressive set. Playing some floorfillers as well as some deeper stuff but then anyone who plays Psychotic Funk from Stacey Pullen is my hero anyway ;) Oh and the liveset from G2G/Los Hermanos was def. the best set i heard the guys play! If you don't have your ticket for the Liverpool show yet get them ASAP! That live version of the Jaguar is rocking, might i say that it is even better then the original one. KJ # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November *cue alex making a £50 bet that he can get on radio 1 by shouting something absoloutely ridiculous at a quiet un-editable point* _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
dare ya! Something like 'Acme Funk' -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 14:47 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November *cue alex making a £50 bet that he can get on radio 1 by shouting something absoloutely ridiculous at a quiet un-editable point* _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring. # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
does anyone have a pocket sized ACME rave megaphone I can borrow? will take good care of it. _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Try singing I am a soulraver when the guys play soulsaver and knock Gerald of stage... On 22-nov-2005, at 15:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: does anyone have a pocket sized ACME rave megaphone I can borrow? will take good care of it. _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
how about something like 313 is full of reactionaries! just joking... ;)) - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:46 PM Subject: RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November *cue alex making a £50 bet that he can get on radio 1 by shouting something absoloutely ridiculous at a quiet un-editable point* _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
what about this: http://www.havetohaveitstore.com/tnpocmeg-50.html c* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: does anyone have a pocket sized ACME rave megaphone I can borrow? will take good care of it. _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
It's gotta be: 'Play something upliftin''! ;-) Ken -Original Message- From: fab. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 15:01 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR how about something like 313 is full of reactionaries! just joking... ;)) - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:46 PM Subject: RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November *cue alex making a £50 bet that he can get on radio 1 by shouting something absoloutely ridiculous at a quiet un-editable point* _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
thanks for all those who have expressed concern. i'd just like to point out that I'm not really going to do it and it is infact a little joke to make the day pass quicker, and I won't infact actually be wasting your 'hard earned 15 quid' (like I get my 15 quid by working not hard etc) thanks _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
No please do it - don't chicken out now! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 15:19 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR thanks for all those who have expressed concern. i'd just like to point out that I'm not really going to do it and it is infact a little joke to make the day pass quicker, and I won't infact actually be wasting your 'hard earned 15 quid' (like I get my 15 quid by working not hard etc) thanks _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring. # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Sorry to ruin the fun, but that recording isn't going ahead unfortunately :( That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Boo! That's a shame -Original Message- From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 15:35 To: Robert Taylor Cc: 313 313 Subject: Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR Sorry to ruin the fun, but that recording isn't going ahead unfortunately :( That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Damn, was already looking forward to it and had already put it in my calendar! :o) N -Original Message- From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 15:35 To: Robert Taylor Cc: 313 313 Subject: Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR Sorry to ruin the fun, but that recording isn't going ahead unfortunately :( That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Not my call unfortunately. On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:39, Neil Tomlinson wrote: Damn, was already looking forward to it and had already put it in my calendar! :o) N -Original Message- From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 15:35 To: Robert Taylor Cc: 313 313 Subject: Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR Sorry to ruin the fun, but that recording isn't going ahead unfortunately :( That reminds me - I believe UR's set in Liverpool will be recorded and broadcast on the Mary Anne Hobbs show on the 29th of November
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Not my call unfortunately. well I'm a license payer *cough cough* and I demand the bbc record u.r. it's in the public interest (all 0.1% of us). _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? m On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not my call unfortunately. well I'm a license payer *cough cough* and I demand the bbc record u.r. it's in the public interest (all 0.1% of us). _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? well, I was only joking actually, but, i'll take the bait. why?! they sound hot recorded live! surely if this was played on radio one, and just one kid decided they were worth seeing or took an interest in their records, then it would be worthwhile no? can't see your reasoning at all really there martin. _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
RE: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
What? Playing in places that the hoi polloi can't get to? ;) -Original Message- From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2005 15:54 To: 313 Mailinglist List Subject: Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? m On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not my call unfortunately. well I'm a license payer *cough cough* and I demand the bbc record u.r. it's in the public interest (all 0.1% of us). _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring. # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
True, but not everyone can get to Liverpool + a Breezeblock session would introduce them to a new (and v. young) audience. Whether you think they should be reaching a wider audience is another story, though my impression is that UR themselves wish to do so. On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:54, Martin Dust wrote: I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? m On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not my call unfortunately. well I'm a license payer *cough cough* and I demand the bbc record u.r. it's in the public interest (all 0.1% of us). _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
On 22-nov-2005, at 16:54, Martin Dust wrote: I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? Indeed, and it is also f*cking expensive to get a 7 people band over so i bet that voodoo needs every single tickets sold.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Just going on what Mike has said in interviews and the way he usually works and it wasn't bait of any kind and I could be completely wrong but that's the vibe I was getting... On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? well, I was only joking actually, but, i'll take the bait. why?! they sound hot recorded live! surely if this was played on radio one, and just one kid decided they were worth seeing or took an interest in their records, then it would be worthwhile no? can't see your reasoning at all really there martin. _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:59, Dan Bean wrote: True, but not everyone can get to Liverpool + a Breezeblock session would introduce them to a new (and v. young) audience. Whether you think they should be reaching a wider audience is another story, though my impression is that UR themselves wish to do so. Mike does things on his own terms as far as I can tell and probably wouldn't give two sh1ts about being on Radio 1... m On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:54, Martin Dust wrote: I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? m On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not my call unfortunately. well I'm a license payer *cough cough* and I demand the bbc record u.r. it's in the public interest (all 0.1% of us). _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
Crikey KJ - I reckon that's the first time we've agreed on anything :) On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:00, Klaas-Jan Jongsma wrote: On 22-nov-2005, at 16:54, Martin Dust wrote: I reckon it's better that they don't, if you wanna hear them, go see them live, you gotta make the journey - isn't that what UR are all about? Indeed, and it is also f*cking expensive to get a 7 people band over so i bet that voodoo needs every single tickets sold.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
and it wasn't bait of any kind I know 1) I think if U.R. live (reportedly the best live techno show anyone has seen) was broadcast on uk radio, it would be good for 'proper' techno. i.e. the peeps who think techno is something else might catch it and think 'oh thats actually quite good'. 2) all I wanted to do was to tape it off the radio as a momento of my night _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
I've got nowt to do with UR but it obvious that they've said no. I don't really agree with this proper' stance either, you may not like D.A.V.E the Drummer and his ilk but he sells more than most Detroit tracks so someone must like it and think it's proper. It would be great if it was broadcast, but I'd figure that it would have to be a pirate station rather than some commercial set up, people will always find want they want if they look hard enough, UR have never taken the easy way out as far as I can tell. m On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and it wasn't bait of any kind I know 1) I think if U.R. live (reportedly the best live techno show anyone has seen) was broadcast on uk radio, it would be good for 'proper' techno. i.e. the peeps who think techno is something else might catch it and think 'oh thats actually quite good'. 2) all I wanted to do was to tape it off the radio as a momento of my night _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
I don't really agree with this proper' stance either, you may not like D.A.V.E the Drummer and his ilk but he sells more than most Detroit tracks so someone must like it and think it's proper 'proper' was the wrong choice of word. I should have said our sort of techno. for what its worth, I gave up thinking one sort of techno was better than the other a long time ago. just a slip of words there. It would be great if it was broadcast, but I'd figure that it would have to be a pirate station rather than some commercial set up, people will always find want they want if they look hard enough, UR have never taken the easy way out as far as I can tell. they've been on the RADIO ONE BREEZEBLOCK live already - earlier this year. just one or two tracks? from demf. but I'd figure that it would have to be a pirate station rather than some commercial set up most pirate radio stations round here sell adverts so they can keep going. _ - End of message text This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
Re: (313) Laurent Garnier and UR
On 22 Nov 2005, at 16:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't really agree with this proper' stance either, you may not like D.A.V.E the Drummer and his ilk but he sells more than most Detroit tracks so someone must like it and think it's proper 'proper' was the wrong choice of word. I should have said our sort of techno. for what its worth, I gave up thinking one sort of techno was better than the other a long time ago. just a slip of words there. No worries fella, I'm just bored with the stance thing and people just running with the pack at the moment, just grumpy me... It would be great if it was broadcast, but I'd figure that it would have to be a pirate station rather than some commercial set up, people will always find want they want if they look hard enough, UR have never taken the easy way out as far as I can tell. they've been on the RADIO ONE BREEZEBLOCK live already - earlier this year. just one or two tracks? from demf. I can't answer for Mike, I can only give my opinion - for what it's worth... but I'd figure that it would have to be a pirate station rather than some commercial set up most pirate radio stations round here sell adverts so they can keep going. Different tho aint it :)
