Re: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-24 Thread Cyclone Wehner
I don't think it's funny at all. I can't see why we couldn't just continue
to discuss it in a grown up manner. If we had misconstrued points they could
have been cleared up. People can disagree without it getting personal. I
never made a personal attack on Tosh. I thought he had originally raised an
interesting issue.

What's more, I was singled out when others made similar points - with
irrelevant slurs on my nationality (even more irrelevant since I'm wog
anyway) and level of intelligence.


this is, by FAR, the funniest post of the year!!

I am going to carry bony and rabbit fur everywhere I go!!

I swear, this is getting printed and going on the wall or something...


Re:[313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-24 Thread stuffed bird
I got to admit, Tosh has some very strong arguments here, 
but he has especially mastered the art of making a point 
in his favor by using a lot of put-down remarks. A keen 
and commonly used trick to baffle opponents in a 
discussion. 

What are we talking about here? Is the digital jockey the 
end of our music? Of course it isn’t. No less than DJ’s 
who still prefer vinyl and refuse using a laptop are 
small-minded traditionalists.
What bothers me in all this ranting and raving about 
progression and embracing new technology is the emptiness 
of it all. Everyday we are slapped in the face with some 
new and improved technology which we should use because we 
would not wish to be hopelessly retarded now would we? 
Sorry to break the news to all the technology freaks, but 
this is absolute bollocks. Just take a minute to look back 
in the past and see what was the last invention which has 
really affected all of our lives, whether we wanted it or 
not. Was it the mobile phone? Was it the internet? No it 
wasn’t. People not using the internet, or not using a 
mobile phone are perfectly happy and do not miss a single 
thing without which they could not live. The last 
invention which really affected everybody and everything 
was the car. It gave us the possibility to see more of the 
world, it affected the environment (roads, pollution), it 
affected the economy. It changed the face of the earth.
All the other new and revolutionary technologies are mere 
trifles in our lives.

What does this all have to do with our discussion? Well, 
whether you use vinyl or final scratch, the progression 
will always made by your mind, by the things you play, by 
the feeling you can pass on to people listening.
Making things ‘easier’ has absolutely nothing to do with 
progress, it’s called laziness, and IMO it’s laziness 
which brings things to a halt.

I prefer to play with vinyls, and I don’t care to tow 
along truckloads of record bags, I feel good with it, and 
if you think that makes me a narrow-minded, old-fashioned 
conservative, you couldn’t be more wrong.

RD




I can't believe the things I read on this list.  This 
list, which uses
the works of Alvin Toffler in vain and frequently evokes 
the imagry of
Blade Runner and music created in a present future 
dystopia, and then I
read crap like this:

Sounds horrible, going through the box is part of the 
artform. It would
make it too calculated, you can't flick through your box, 
land on
something
else and think hmmm, now maybe I can play that instead.

The smell of brand new vinyl out of the sleeve, the
crackle of the record under the needle... there's
something spiritual and special about vinyl that no
other media can replicate.

Pushing buttons has nothing to do with dj'ing as far as 
I am concerned.
Imagine the joy of finally finding that record you've 
been 
after for several years, and then compare it to 
downloading that track

Seeing a set being pieced together with records and
the DJ making the set come together is part of the
thrill and artform.

Do you really want to watch some dude just press a few
buttons on a computer, a pre-planned set, there could be 
no spontaneity,
by default. It would be as boring as hell. Any fool could 
use the new
system as it would be a relative cinch.

I can't see too many house DJs adopting the new thing

Like aren't some of the hip-hop turntablists 
establishing a way of
notating scratches?


I also sometimes wonder about about the reading ability 
of people on
this list.  I seem to recall saying the only aspect of 
DJ'ing that it
changes is the carrying of vinyl and selecting of tracks 
to play.  Do
you people have that much difficulty with English?  Is 
the Aussie
dialect really that difficult that it doesn't penetrate 
the quoted
sentence?  I will break down the sentence:

*the only aspect of DJ'ing that it changes* - this 
implies there is only
one aspect, but there are actually two, now I see why you 
are all
confused.
*is the carrying of vinyl* - this is aspect one, the DJ 
doesn't have to
carry around as much vinyl anymore.  How much less is up 
to the
individual.
*and selecting of tracks to play* - this is the other 
aspect, the DJ no
longer has to flip through a box of records.

PAY ATTENTION!  THE PERFORMER STILL MUST BUILD A SET, 
MUST STILL
PLACE THE NEEDLE ON A RECORD ON A TECHNICS 1200, MUST 
STILL MATCH BEATS,
MUST STILL CREATE A MOMENTARY EVENT, MUST STILL LOOK FOR 
HO'S, MUST
STILL TRY NOT TO KNOCK THE NEEDLE WHEN BLOWING COKE, MUST 
STILL DECIDE
IF RECORD 'B' IS SUITABLE TO PLAY AFTER RECORD 'A', ETC 
ETC
ET-FU**ING-CETERA.

So with that out of the way and because I am bored and 
incredulous I
will respond to each of these in order.

Sounds horrible, going through the box is part of the 
artform. It would
make it too calculated, you can't flick through your box, 
land on
something
else and think hmmm, now maybe I can play that instead.

-- How the hell is looking through a box for something 
you 

Re: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-24 Thread Cyclone Wehner
I agree, I think what I and others have been said has maybe been
misconstrued.  I myself never said I was adverse to technology, I never said
I was a traditionalist. Also we were discussing DJs, not live acts, though I
agree this divide could be rendered even more fluid in the future. Someone
mentioned Sutekh's live sets but that is something different - in fact I
just chased up an interview on him the other week and I believe I was the
only one to cover his Australian tour, so there you go. I'm on the pulse. :)

Like I said there is good AND bad technology, technology that aids
creativity, technology that hampers it. Did you all not see my post about
Maurice Fulton. He had a computer for a year and couldn't use it as he
didn't know how to turn it on  - this in 98. Finally his gf showed him. Now
he has produced a whole album with just a powerbook and a keyboard. And he
is a creative person, his music is out there. His studio set up fits on a
window sill. He can take it on a plane! That is an example of technology
aiding creativity, you can work without all that scary looking stuff around
you, it probably frees the mind. Maybe I was wrong to jump in and assess the
new Finalscratch without seeing it, hearing it, I can see that, sorry Tosh
for that. But what Tosh described sounded awfully like a high tech jukebox
like in those old diners and damn that is old skool, not future skool, but
hey the discussions are great and Tosh should feel chuffed to have
introduced a cool topic that brought out interesting responses from Dale
Lawrence and others, rather than jump in and diss people he barely knows
just because they are sceptical of some things.

I got to admit, Tosh has some very strong arguments here

What are we talking about here? Is the digital jockey the
end of our music? Of course it isn’t. No less than DJ’s
who still prefer vinyl and refuse using a laptop are
small-minded traditionalists.
What bothers me in all this ranting and raving about
progression and embracing new technology is the emptiness
of it all. Everyday we are slapped in the face with some
new and improved technology which we should use because we
would not wish to be hopelessly retarded now would we?
Sorry to break the news to all the technology freaks, but
this is absolute bollocks. Just take a minute to look back
in the past and see what was the last invention which has
really affected all of our lives, whether we wanted it or
not. Was it the mobile phone? Was it the internet? No it
wasn’t. People not using the internet, or not using a
mobile phone are perfectly happy and do not miss a single
thing without which they could not live. The last
invention which really affected everybody and everything
was the car. It gave us the possibility to see more of the
world, it affected the environment (roads, pollution), it
affected the economy. It changed the face of the earth.
All the other new and revolutionary technologies are mere
trifles in our lives.

What does this all have to do with our discussion? Well,
whether you use vinyl or final scratch, the progression
will always made by your mind, by the things you play, by
the feeling you can pass on to people listening.
Making things ‘easier’ has absolutely nothing to do with
progress, it’s called laziness, and IMO it’s laziness
which brings things to a halt.

I prefer to play with vinyls, and I don’t care to tow
along truckloads of record bags, I feel good with it, and
if you think that makes me a narrow-minded, old-fashioned
conservative, you couldn’t be more wrong.


RE: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-24 Thread Jongsma, K.J.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
 Van: stuffed bird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I got to admit, Tosh has some very strong arguments here, 
 but he has especially mastered the art of making a point 
 in his favor by using a lot of put-down remarks. A keen 
 and commonly used trick to baffle opponents in a 
 discussion. 


Tosh has a point but he could mail it in another less-flammable-way.
The original discussion reminded me a lot of the early days of
electronic music when the old-school musicians said that making music
with drum-computers and samplers wasn't real music. When they played
in instrument they could feel it because they triggered their guitar
or hit the hihat. 
In the end the only thing that counts is whether or not the music you
play (or make) has a good spirit, technique is just a tool and not a
religion. Just do what you feel is right. it's all about the spirit

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBOm6nzliiwn/7Ov6sEQJdzgCcCdWcVFX/qSKrCPirgtogfGhwFKMAn0NJ
Kan0Jw0ftF7oK/ft1GYN2s/U
=/PqF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


[the most OT post of the planet] Re: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-24 Thread Nick Walsh
Cyclone,
You have to remember that half of the guys on this
list now are children between 16-21 y o. This isn't a
personal attack either... but if you're as grown up as
you say you are you need to just take it like a pinch
of salt... just ignore it... 

Forgot those d*cks... If they bring up a good point
then fair enough but there is never any need for them
to be abusive... Some people never ever grow up and
there are a hell of a lot of w*nkers on this list...
It is impossible to strain all of these people out
because they make up the bulk of society... 

I have been that kind of t*sser before... when I was
about 16 or 17, I kept sending dirty emails to Isla
Fisher (remember her?). She actually replied to
some... and was really nice, put me down softly... 

An answer, when calm, turns away rage..., from the
Bible (but I don't know exactly where:) Time to stop
now... Tosh etc. can go and find some new friends...

Take care,
Nick:)

--- Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I don't think it's funny at all. I can't see why we
 couldn't just continue
 to discuss it in a grown up manner. If we had
 misconstrued points they could
 have been cleared up. People can disagree without it
 getting personal. I
 never made a personal attack on Tosh. I thought he
 had originally raised an
 interesting issue.
 
 What's more, I was singled out when others made
 similar points - with
 irrelevant slurs on my nationality (even more
 irrelevant since I'm wog
 anyway) and level of intelligence.
 
 
 this is, by FAR, the funniest post of the year!!
 
 I am going to carry bony and rabbit fur everywhere
 I go!!
 
 I swear, this is getting printed and going on the
 wall or something...
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. 
http://auctions.yahoo.com/


Re:[313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-24 Thread Williams, Howard



I think it's fair to say people without a car are capable of being happy and
don't miss a single thing without which they could not live. Mobile phones
and the internet also allow us to see/hear more of the world and it's people
and, i think just a tad, affect the economy. 
This Finalscratch 'debate' is crazy. If people were just a little less
rigid

his is absolute bollocks. Just take a minute to look back 

in the past and see what was the last invention which has 

really affected all of our lives, whether we wanted it or 

not. Was it the mobile phone? Was it the internet? No it 

wasn't. People not using the internet, or not using a 

mobile phone are perfectly happy and do not miss a single 

thing without which they could not live. The last 

invention which really affected everybody and everything 

was the car. It gave us the possibility to see more of the 

world, it affected the environment (roads, pollution), it 

affected the economy. It changed the face of the earth.

All the other new and revolutionary technologies are mere 

trifles in our lives.


This comment is insane, NOONE is saying that. I can't understand the
defensiveness this topic generates. 

I prefer to play with vinyls, and I don't care to tow 

along truckloads of record bags, I feel good with it, and 

if you think that makes me a narrow-minded, old-fashioned 

conservative, you couldn't be more wrong.


Re: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-23 Thread Cyclone Wehner


I can't believe the things I read on this list.  This list, which uses
the works of Alvin Toffler in vain and frequently evokes the imagry of
Blade Runner and music created in a present future dystopia, and then I
read crap like this:

Well man since you quote my crap as call it maybe you should keep in mind
that I never cite Toffler, Blade Runner, et al. I stick to my words.  


I also sometimes wonder about about the reading ability of people on
this list.  I seem to recall saying the only aspect of DJ'ing that it
changes is the carrying of vinyl and selecting of tracks to play.  Do
you people have that much difficulty with English?  Is the Aussie
dialect really that difficult that it doesn't penetrate the quoted
sentence?  I will break down the sentence:

Well I have a scholarship-based first class hons degree in English at the
Australian equivalent of an Ivy League University so maybe you should
freakin' hold off on the presumptions.

*the only aspect of DJ'ing that it changes* - this implies there is only
one aspect, but there are actually two, now I see why you are all
confused.
*is the carrying of vinyl* - this is aspect one, the DJ doesn't have to
carry around as much vinyl anymore.  How much less is up to the
individual.
*and selecting of tracks to play* - this is the other aspect, the DJ no
longer has to flip through a box of records.

And you think that change in set up wouldn't impact on DJing? I disagree.


So with that out of the way and because I am bored and incredulous I
will respond to each of these in order.

Sounds horrible, going through the box is part of the artform. It would
make it too calculated, you can't flick through your box, land on
something
else and think hmmm, now maybe I can play that instead.

-- How the hell is looking through a box for something you can't find
and maybe left at home part of any artform?!?  And is this any different
than the DJ looking through the porn folder on their computer and
finding some track and thinking oh yeah that's where I downloaded that
stupid thing, my mouse must have slipped while I was typing with one
hand, lemme play this now because I am so spontaneous and
un-calculated.

I stand by my words. Are you a
salesman for it? You sound like one of the iMac sales people when I put it
to them that the iMac has been an absolute disaster and there had been a
cover up and they denied it, made sexist accusations, really got worked up,
etc. Next day the
company posted its financial report, not good. Whole universities are
trashing them etc - my research background came up with some embrassing info
for them, too. Why are you so damn overwrought over it. Up until now it was
a good discussion and very interesting. Just maybe you failed to explain it
properly. But I stick by my POV and won't be intimidated by this nonsense. I
know PLENTY of good international DJs would agree.

Lighten up!

Cheers

Cyclone


Re: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-23 Thread Glyph1001
Being a huge Mac fan, please explain the reasons for the absolute disaster 
and 
what cover-up?...even though I would never change alliances or use anything 
else 
other than Apple Mac products.  I'm sure that not every product or company is 
perfect, including PCs but still would like to know.

Think different...

glyph( a machead that's keeping it real.)

P.S. sorry for the irrelevance folks, my curiosity got the best of me.  
response can be private.

In a message dated 1/23/01 4:55:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I stand by my words. Are you a
salesman for it? You sound like one of the iMac sales people when I put
it
to them that the iMac has been an absolute disaster and there had been
a
cover up and they denied it, made sexist accusations, really got worked
up,
etc. Next day the
company posted its financial report, not good. Whole universities are
trashing them etc - my research background came up with some embrassing
info
for them, too. Why are you so damn overwrought over it. Up until now it
was
a good discussion and very interesting. Just maybe you failed to explain
it
properly. But I stick by my POV and won't be intimidated by this nonsense.
I
know PLENTY of good international DJs would agree.


Re: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)

2001-01-23 Thread darw_n
this is, by FAR, the funniest post of the year!!

I am going to carry bony and rabbit fur everywhere I go!!

I swear, this is getting printed and going on the wall or something...

darw_n

create, demonstrate, toneshift...

search for djdarwin on napster
www.sphereproductions.com
www.mannequinodd.com
www.mp3.com/darw_n
- Original Message - 
From: Tosh Cooey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 7:34 AM
Subject: [313] Haha, you are so lame!! (was future of DJ'ing)


 I can't believe the things I read on this list.  This list, which uses
 the works of Alvin Toffler in vain and frequently evokes the imagry of
 Blade Runner and music created in a present future dystopia, and then I
 read crap like this:
 
 Sounds horrible, going through the box is part of the artform. It would
 make it too calculated, you can't flick through your box, land on
 something
 else and think hmmm, now maybe I can play that instead.
 
 The smell of brand new vinyl out of the sleeve, the
 crackle of the record under the needle... there's
 something spiritual and special about vinyl that no
 other media can replicate.
 
 Pushing buttons has nothing to do with dj'ing as far as I am concerned.
 Imagine the joy of finally finding that record you've been 
 after for several years, and then compare it to downloading that track
 
 Seeing a set being pieced together with records and
 the DJ making the set come together is part of the
 thrill and artform.
 
 Do you really want to watch some dude just press a few
 buttons on a computer, a pre-planned set, there could be no spontaneity,
 by default. It would be as boring as hell. Any fool could use the new
 system as it would be a relative cinch.
 
 I can't see too many house DJs adopting the new thing
 
 Like aren't some of the hip-hop turntablists establishing a way of
 notating scratches?
 
 
 I also sometimes wonder about about the reading ability of people on
 this list.  I seem to recall saying the only aspect of DJ'ing that it
 changes is the carrying of vinyl and selecting of tracks to play.  Do
 you people have that much difficulty with English?  Is the Aussie
 dialect really that difficult that it doesn't penetrate the quoted
 sentence?  I will break down the sentence:
 
 *the only aspect of DJ'ing that it changes* - this implies there is only
 one aspect, but there are actually two, now I see why you are all
 confused.
 *is the carrying of vinyl* - this is aspect one, the DJ doesn't have to
 carry around as much vinyl anymore.  How much less is up to the
 individual.
 *and selecting of tracks to play* - this is the other aspect, the DJ no
 longer has to flip through a box of records.
 
 PAY ATTENTION!  THE PERFORMER STILL MUST BUILD A SET, MUST STILL
 PLACE THE NEEDLE ON A RECORD ON A TECHNICS 1200, MUST STILL MATCH BEATS,
 MUST STILL CREATE A MOMENTARY EVENT, MUST STILL LOOK FOR HO'S, MUST
 STILL TRY NOT TO KNOCK THE NEEDLE WHEN BLOWING COKE, MUST STILL DECIDE
 IF RECORD 'B' IS SUITABLE TO PLAY AFTER RECORD 'A', ETC ETC
 ET-FU**ING-CETERA.
 
 So with that out of the way and because I am bored and incredulous I
 will respond to each of these in order.
 
 Sounds horrible, going through the box is part of the artform. It would
 make it too calculated, you can't flick through your box, land on
 something
 else and think hmmm, now maybe I can play that instead.
 
 -- How the hell is looking through a box for something you can't find
 and maybe left at home part of any artform?!?  And is this any different
 than the DJ looking through the porn folder on their computer and
 finding some track and thinking oh yeah that's where I downloaded that
 stupid thing, my mouse must have slipped while I was typing with one
 hand, lemme play this now because I am so spontaneous and
 un-calculated.
 
 The smell of brand new vinyl out of the sleeve, the
 crackle of the record under the needle... there's
 something spiritual and special about vinyl that no
 other media can replicate.
 
 -- Oh my GodIf this is so important to you and there is a big
 enough market then I'm sure each unit will come with an ebony rod and a
 piece of rabbit fur so you can make all the static electricy you can
 manage, or just buy a nitrous balloon (empty it how you like, I don't
 care) reinflate the balloon, rub it on your head and then touch the
 leads on your equuipment, you'll get all the crackles your heart
 desires.  Similarly if you really want crackles I'm sure someone will
 build you Kai's PowerCrackles for SoundForge.
 
 Pushing buttons has nothing to do with dj'ing as far as I am concerned.
 Imagine the joy of finally finding that record you've been 
 after for several years, and then compare it to downloading that track
 
 -- Imagine the joys of actually learning how to play the bass, and then
 play the piano, and then play the drums, and then putting it all
 together to make a song, not just press the Drums button and having
 instant rhythm.  AND ANYWAY WHO