Re: (313) Ai 2006
Quite in a bizarre way, i think Adult would be close. ... What i really think is: detroit techno follows the natural line of american black music evolution. Pure emotion, pure being there, soul thing. What would be the IDM of the 60s, 70s, 80s? Maybe it was music for inteligent people at that time. Some friends of mine think that cybotron's clear is a stupid disposable low-minded track. They prefer aphex twin tracks. I think clear is brilliant. And I think aphex is brilliant too. Maybe IDM is label that people like to be associated with, more than a label to define sound itself. Like indie rock (released from major labels) nowadays. I don't see Detroit techno being IDM. But i can see detroit artists trying to follow the ways of the market - aware of that or not. Kw (remember to forgive my bad english and feel free to correct me :-) ) On 21/03/2006, at 13:05, Odeluga, Ken wrote: OK people, how about if we talk about some Detroit-related music on this list?!? Has anyone else acquired the aforementioned compilation since it was first mentioned? Would you like to volunteer your thoughts? I do feel that Ai is really trying to lay a marker down in the direction which the compilation seems to be pointing, although as I said, it's not the only atmosphere you'll find on Ai records. There is a distinct analogue, 'IDMish' tone in the music on that compilation, a lot of it is mid-tempo and it's closer to electro than techno. The emphasis on 'melancholy' rather than dark seems quite akin to the 'classic' Detroit tone, as much as there is one (and of course there are just as many exceptions in what we call 'Detroit techno'.) Also let me ask this: which Detroit-associated artist(s) do you think would fit most closely into this 'new direction' which Ai seems to want to travel in? Ken
Re: (313) Ai 2006
Man, i should've say that instead of trying to build an obtuse statement like the one i wrote before. :-D Kw On 21/03/2006, at 10:03, Dan Bean wrote: The word 'quality' is actually a noun, it shouldn't be used as an adjective. Phrases such as 'quality electronic music' or 'quality house' employ the word 'quality' as an adjective, which is ungrammatical. I'll get back to reading those serial numbers now...
Re: (313) Ai 2006
The label quality, in my way of thinking, is intended to be applied to something tested, a comercial product, with an especific purpose. Music itself is multi-purposal, if i can say this way. Is expression. Some people might like it, other might hate it. If quality means it was music produced under the standarts of the best gear or best pure sound it's even worst. Creativity don't need the ideal technical enviroment to come out - everybody knows that. And if quality means this music has quality comparing to other music that has no quality, the artist/producer is talking about his personal musical taste. Well, in any of the situations above, quality means nothing. I would find useless to label any music i would produce as quality, once the music should speak for itself. That's my own opinnion, of course. That's my way of thinking. Sorry for some bad english. :) Kw On 20/03/2006, at 07:23, Odeluga, Ken wrote: -Original Message- From: Kowalsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2006 00:17 To: [313] Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 i've listened the tracks in the bleep site. Some are good tracks, i agree. But i cannot agree with the words on the CD cover: quality electronic music. But i don't agree with tha so called label idm as well. ... I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? Kw *** You're entitled to your own opinion of course Kowalsky, but if as you say 'some are good tracks' how can you disagree with the (so-called) title 'Quality Electronic Music'?!? By the way, I say so-called title, because apparently 'Quality Electronic Music' is not the official title. http://www.discogs.com/release/637836 Ah, well, whatever, I agree with the title/not title myself, although I think the comp highlights only one side of Ai. Ken On 17/03/2006, at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid. Those initials make sense. jeff
Re: (313) Ai 2006
That's a pretty nice design. Thank you. Kw On 20/03/2006, at 07:42, Emile Facey - Plant43 wrote: I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? http://www.airecords.com/ai015_web.jpg on 20/3/06 10:23 am, Odeluga, Ken at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Kowalsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2006 00:17 To: [313] Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 i've listened the tracks in the bleep site. Some are good tracks, i agree. But i cannot agree with the words on the CD cover: quality electronic music. But i don't agree with tha so called label idm as well. ... I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? Kw *** You're entitled to your own opinion of course Kowalsky, but if as you say 'some are good tracks' how can you disagree with the (so-called) title 'Quality Electronic Music'?!? By the way, I say so-called title, because apparently 'Quality Electronic Music' is not the official title. http://www.discogs.com/release/637836 Ah, well, whatever, I agree with the title/not title myself, although I think the comp highlights only one side of Ai. Ken On 17/03/2006, at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid. Those initials make sense. jeff
Re: (313) Ai 2006
On 3/20/06, Kowalsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Creativity don't need the ideal technical enviroment to come out - everybody knows that. ha, dont be so sure about that. there are entire genres of music based around people who would disagree highly with your statement. tom
Re: (313) Ai 2006
hi On 3/20/06, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ha, dont be so sure about that. there are entire genres of music based around people who would disagree highly with your statement. wouldn't that be entire *industries* of music based on around people ... -- \js [ http://or8.net/~johns/ ]
Re: (313) Ai 2006
The word 'quality' is actually a noun, it shouldn't be used as an adjective. Phrases such as 'quality electronic music' or 'quality house' employ the word 'quality' as an adjective, which is ungrammatical. I'll get back to reading those serial numbers now...
RE: (313) Ai 2006
-Original Message- From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 March 2006 10:03 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 The word 'quality' is actually a noun, it shouldn't be used as an adjective. Phrases such as 'quality electronic music' or 'quality house' employ the word 'quality' as an adjective, which is ungrammatical. I'll get back to reading those serial numbers now... But before you do, note down in your exercise book that the usage guidance for the word 'quality' in Webster's New World dictionary (yeah I know, it's not orthodox, but what can you do, the youth of today, etc, etc) includes 'adj. : of high quality.' Don't forget your catalogue numbers whilst you're at it. Ken
Re: (313) Ai 2006
On 3/21/06, Odeluga, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But before you do, note down in your exercise book that the usage guidance for the word 'quality' in Webster's New World dictionary (yeah I know, it's not orthodox, but what can you do, the youth of today, etc, etc) includes 'adj. : of high quality.' i was just about to point that out. m-w.com is the bomb! tom
Re: (313) Ai 2006
One Look isn't too shabby, either. http://www.onelook.com/ -- Original message -- But before you do, note down in your exercise book that the usage guidance for the word 'quality' in Webster's New World dictionary (yeah I know, it's not orthodox, but what can you do, the youth of today, etc, etc) includes 'adj. : of high quality.' i was just about to point that out. m-w.com is the bomb!
RE: (313) Ai 2006
I know it's not the place to ask but are there any decent British English (ie proper) Online dictionaries? You know, ones which spell things correctly. ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 March 2006 14:58 To: Thomas D. Cox, Jr.; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 One Look isn't too shabby, either. http://www.onelook.com/ -- Original message -- But before you do, note down in your exercise book that the usage guidance for the word 'quality' in Webster's New World dictionary (yeah I know, it's not orthodox, but what can you do, the youth of today, etc, etc) includes 'adj. : of high quality.' i was just about to point that out. m-w.com is the bomb! # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
RE: (313) Ai 2006
Hmmm...interesting can of worms, especially if one has an OED handy and can check the history of spelling changes. :-) OED = NOT free. Steep subscription price on that one, unless you have daemon tools and a bittorrent client. http://www.oed.com/
RE: (313) Ai 2006
According to the OED, quality is a noun only. For a new meaning to be added to the OED, I think three instances in print of the word (from certain sources only) need to be found. I was referrring to the English spoken in the UK, Ai being a UK label. Webster's is a US dictionary, as previously pointed out. The OED is the definitive guide to language for UK English. So nuur!
Re: (313) Ai 2006
On 3/21/06, Dan Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the OED, quality is a noun only. For a new meaning to be added to the OED, I think three instances in print of the word (from certain sources only) need to be found. I was referrring to the English spoken in the UK, Ai being a UK label. Webster's is a US dictionary, as previously pointed out. The OED is the definitive guide to language for UK English. detroit isnt in england, so we'll use the proper vernacular around here. neener neener neener! ;p tmo
RE: (313) Ai 2006
I prefer Collins' - it's less stuffy than the OED and more accepting of comtemporary argot. -Original Message- From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 March 2006 15:44 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Ai 2006 According to the OED, quality is a noun only. For a new meaning to be added to the OED, I think three instances in print of the word (from certain sources only) need to be found. I was referrring to the English spoken in the UK, Ai being a UK label. Webster's is a US dictionary, as previously pointed out. The OED is the definitive guide to language for UK English. So nuur! # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
Re: (313) Ai 2006
detroit isnt in england, so we'll use the proper vernacular around here. neener neener neener! Well as long as you don't mind being wrong that's fine. On reflection, that never seems to have bothered you in the past. Fondest regards, D.
Re: (313) Ai 2006
On 3/21/06, Dan Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: detroit isnt in england, so we'll use the proper vernacular around here. neener neener neener! Well as long as you don't mind being wrong that's fine. On reflection, that never seems to have bothered you in the past. not only does it not bother me, but i love it when it bothers others! its a win/win situation for me! :) tommm
RE: (313) Ai 2006
OK people, how about if we talk about some Detroit-related music on this list?!? Has anyone else acquired the aforementioned compilation since it was first mentioned? Would you like to volunteer your thoughts? I do feel that Ai is really trying to lay a marker down in the direction which the compilation seems to be pointing, although as I said, it's not the only atmosphere you'll find on Ai records. There is a distinct analogue, 'IDMish' tone in the music on that compilation, a lot of it is mid-tempo and it's closer to electro than techno. The emphasis on 'melancholy' rather than dark seems quite akin to the 'classic' Detroit tone, as much as there is one (and of course there are just as many exceptions in what we call 'Detroit techno'.) Also let me ask this: which Detroit-associated artist(s) do you think would fit most closely into this 'new direction' which Ai seems to want to travel in? Ken
Re: (313) Ai 2006
All I know is I got a CD in the post from AI that had some dude with a fist coming out of his mouth that was pretty freaky. Oh and Jacen Solo's LP was pretty good. - Original Message - From: Odeluga, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:05 PM Subject: RE: (313) Ai 2006 OK people, how about if we talk about some Detroit-related music on this list?!? Has anyone else acquired the aforementioned compilation since it was first mentioned? Would you like to volunteer your thoughts? I do feel that Ai is really trying to lay a marker down in the direction which the compilation seems to be pointing, although as I said, it's not the only atmosphere you'll find on Ai records. There is a distinct analogue, 'IDMish' tone in the music on that compilation, a lot of it is mid-tempo and it's closer to electro than techno. The emphasis on 'melancholy' rather than dark seems quite akin to the 'classic' Detroit tone, as much as there is one (and of course there are just as many exceptions in what we call 'Detroit techno'.) Also let me ask this: which Detroit-associated artist(s) do you think would fit most closely into this 'new direction' which Ai seems to want to travel in? Ken
RE: (313) Ai 2006
Yes, it's all very charming and quaint. But still wrong. -Original Message- From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 March 2006 15:55 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 detroit isnt in england, so we'll use the proper vernacular around here. neener neener neener! Well as long as you don't mind being wrong that's fine. On reflection, that never seems to have bothered you in the past. Fondest regards, D. # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
Re: (313) Ai 2006
Some of the stuff from Ai over the past year or so hasn't been as hot as some before it imo...I really liked the Normal, Michael Manning, Jacen Solo Dez Williams and Claro Intelecto 12s. The Estate, Gemote Leisure comps were nice as well. FZV sounded good to these ears too. Yunx's Snake in the Grass was good, but I wasn't that keen on In The Heat of the Night. With the exception of Tomcats in Tokyo, most of the contributors to the new comp seem to be newcomers or using aliases. Save the last track, there's a pretty consistent feel this record. jeff -- Original message -- From: Stewart Caig [EMAIL PROTECTED] All I know is I got a CD in the post from AI that had some dude with a fist coming out of his mouth that was pretty freaky. Oh and Jacen Solo's LP was pretty good.
RE: (313) Ai 2006
what non-techno thing are we arguing about today on 313? playing catch-up, -Joe Robert Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it's all very charming and quaint. But still wrong. -Original Message- From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 March 2006 15:55 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 detroit isnt in england, so we'll use the proper vernacular around here. neener neener neener! Well as long as you don't mind being wrong that's fine. On reflection, that never seems to have bothered you in the past. Fondest regards, D. # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. #
Re: (313) Ai 2006
- Original Message - From: Robert Taylor I prefer Collins' - it's less stuffy than the OED and more accepting of comtemporary argot. Rye argot? seek
Re: (313) Ai 2006
- Original Message - From: /0 what non-techno thing are we arguing about today on 313? playing catch-up, -Joe Rye ergot. seek
Re: (313) Ai 2006
- Original Message - From: /0 what non-techno thing are we arguing about today on 313? playing catch-up, -Joe Wry argot. seek
Re: (313) Ai 2006
Rye ergot. Yes please!
Re: (313) Ai 2006
I'll have mine toasted please. great, I've been suckered into adding to this OT thread thanks very much MEK Dan Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] o.uk To 313@hyperreal.org 03/21/06 11:10 AM cc Subject Re: (313) Ai 2006 Rye ergot. Yes please!
Re: (313) Ai 2006
On 3/21/06, Stewart Caig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I know is I got a CD in the post from AI that had some dude with a fist coming out of his mouth that was pretty freaky. Oh and Jacen Solo's LP was pretty good. i heard a demo disc of jacen solo's stuff that was indeed quite excellent. he's definitely someone to keep an eye out for . tom
Re: (313) Ai 2006
you're thinking ergot (claviceps purpurpea), as in ergotism, the oldest recorded source of fungus poisoning. the active component are the ergot alkaloids, which are all derivatives of lysergic acid. they are molecularly related to adrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin ergometrine is used to control postpartum bleeding, while very small doses of ergotamine can be use to treat migranes. heh, I work in a toxicology lab and just happen to have a paper on ergotism sitting on my desk ;) seek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Robert Taylor I prefer Collins' - it's less stuffy than the OED and more accepting of comtemporary argot. Rye argot? seek
RE: (313) Ai 2006
Odeluga, Ken wrote: OK people, how about if we talk about some Detroit-related music on this list?!? Has anyone else acquired the aforementioned compilation since it was first mentioned? Would you like to volunteer your thoughts? I thought it was pretty good, but definitely less dance-oriented than most Ai stuff. My full review is here: http://www.gridface.com/reviews/sampler_06.html J
Re: (313) Ai 2006
i've listened the tracks in the bleep site. Some are good tracks, i agree. But i cannot agree with the words on the CD cover: quality electronic music. But i don't agree with tha so called label idm as well. ... I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? Kw On 17/03/2006, at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid. Those initials make sense. jeff
RE: (313) Ai 2006
-Original Message- From: Kowalsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2006 00:17 To: [313] Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 i've listened the tracks in the bleep site. Some are good tracks, i agree. But i cannot agree with the words on the CD cover: quality electronic music. But i don't agree with tha so called label idm as well. ... I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? Kw *** You're entitled to your own opinion of course Kowalsky, but if as you say 'some are good tracks' how can you disagree with the (so-called) title 'Quality Electronic Music'?!? By the way, I say so-called title, because apparently 'Quality Electronic Music' is not the official title. http://www.discogs.com/release/637836 Ah, well, whatever, I agree with the title/not title myself, although I think the comp highlights only one side of Ai. Ken On 17/03/2006, at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid. Those initials make sense. jeff
Re: (313) Ai 2006
I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? http://www.airecords.com/ai015_web.jpg on 20/3/06 10:23 am, Odeluga, Ken at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Kowalsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2006 00:17 To: [313] Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 i've listened the tracks in the bleep site. Some are good tracks, i agree. But i cannot agree with the words on the CD cover: quality electronic music. But i don't agree with tha so called label idm as well. ... I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? Kw *** You're entitled to your own opinion of course Kowalsky, but if as you say 'some are good tracks' how can you disagree with the (so-called) title 'Quality Electronic Music'?!? By the way, I say so-called title, because apparently 'Quality Electronic Music' is not the official title. http://www.discogs.com/release/637836 Ah, well, whatever, I agree with the title/not title myself, although I think the comp highlights only one side of Ai. Ken On 17/03/2006, at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid. Those initials make sense. jeff
Re: (313) Ai 2006
let's play darts! - Original Message - From: Emile Facey - Plant43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Odeluga, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kowalsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [313] 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:42 AM Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? http://www.airecords.com/ai015_web.jpg on 20/3/06 10:23 am, Odeluga, Ken at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Kowalsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2006 00:17 To: [313] Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 i've listened the tracks in the bleep site. Some are good tracks, i agree. But i cannot agree with the words on the CD cover: quality electronic music. But i don't agree with tha so called label idm as well. ... I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? Kw *** You're entitled to your own opinion of course Kowalsky, but if as you say 'some are good tracks' how can you disagree with the (so-called) title 'Quality Electronic Music'?!? By the way, I say so-called title, because apparently 'Quality Electronic Music' is not the official title. http://www.discogs.com/release/637836 Ah, well, whatever, I agree with the title/not title myself, although I think the comp highlights only one side of Ai. Ken On 17/03/2006, at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid. Those initials make sense. jeff
RE: (313) Ai 2006
No, just drift into the void and be, man! ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2006 10:53 To: [313] Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 let's play darts! - Original Message - From: Emile Facey - Plant43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Odeluga, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kowalsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [313] 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:42 AM Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? http://www.airecords.com/ai015_web.jpg on 20/3/06 10:23 am, Odeluga, Ken at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Kowalsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 March 2006 00:17 To: [313] Subject: Re: (313) Ai 2006 i've listened the tracks in the bleep site. Some are good tracks, i agree. But i cannot agree with the words on the CD cover: quality electronic music. But i don't agree with tha so called label idm as well. ... I am curious to see the picture disc. Anyone has a link to a photo or something? Kw *** You're entitled to your own opinion of course Kowalsky, but if as you say 'some are good tracks' how can you disagree with the (so-called) title 'Quality Electronic Music'?!? By the way, I say so-called title, because apparently 'Quality Electronic Music' is not the official title. http://www.discogs.com/release/637836 Ah, well, whatever, I agree with the title/not title myself, although I think the comp highlights only one side of Ai. Ken On 17/03/2006, at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid. Those initials make sense. jeff
Re: (313) Ai 2006
Some great tracks on there, highly recommended. One of the more psychedelic picture discs I've seen for a while as well.
Re: (313) Ai 2006
Yeah, I've never seen a picture disc that looked like that before, has anyone else on this list? on 17/3/06 1:51 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah and just check out that vinyl! - not only is it a really tasty looking picture disc it has the unique-in-my-experience feature of being a practical picture disc; where normally it's hard to see where tracks start and finish on these on this one each track is a different colour or pattern! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2006 12:09 Anyone pining for the glory days of Warp (when Detroit, techno and what branched off into idm were still bubbling in a less segregated stew) would do well to spend some time with the new Ai compilation. The label has issued some nice things over the past several years, but this one is especially solid.
