Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-21 Thread fabrice Lig


Yes, true,
But each time I'm talking to some europeans who came to Aussie, they are 
saying than AUstralian are really proud of their wine :-) !!! Like french of 
course.!!! ha !






Fabrice >From: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: fabrice Lig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (313) At Les
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:27:10 +1100

Ha ha, Christian is the wine expert!
Did he e-mail you? He talks about you all the time! He loved that tour (we
all did!). He said it inspired him.

Cheers

Cyc

--
>From: "fabrice Lig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: (313) At Les
>Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 5:37 AM
>

> I have to admit than the first time I hear that track I didn't realize 
how

> beautiful it was. Now its one of my favourite.
> That the story of amazing and timeless tunes... Better and Better with
> years...Like good wine...( french or Australian wine Cyclone, of course 
;-)

>
>
>
>
>
> Fabrice Lig
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "M : A : T : R : I : X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <313@hyperreal.org>
>>Subject: Re: (313) At Les
>>Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:40:24 -0500
>>
>>just this: it instantly makes the rain go away and the sun shines 
brightly.

>>day or night.
>>
>>on 12/16/04 5:18 PM, Ronny Pries at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these words:
>>
>> > let me think,
>> >
>> > instant hard-on
>> > tear in the left eye
>> > urgent need to hug someone
>> >
>> > forgot something?
>> >
>> > rp
>> >
>> > Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
>> >> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
>> >> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
>> >> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>> >>
>> >> tom
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >> andythepooh.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
> _
> Faites votre propre homepage http://webbuilder.fr.msn.be
>


_
Découvrez MSN WebMessenger ! http://webmessenger.msn.com/?mkt=fr-be



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-20 Thread fabrice Lig

Thanx man !
Was a great night, not really useful for me in Brussels. I think they'll set 
up some other one later...
And on saturday, I played with Titonton in Gent, was so great ! An amazing 
set from him again...I was really tired but I was not able to leave the 
dancefloor ! ;-)





Fabrice Lig



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fabrice Lig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (313) At Les
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:54:54 -0500 (EST)

Heya mate,
happened to catch your set at the private party on Saturday night (on rue
du Chimiste).  wonderful selection and great fun!  Thanks for all the
classic tracks LOL,

cheers,
Dennis



_
Faites le plein d'idées cadeaux, envoyer des e-cartes, ... 
http://www.fr.msn.be/specialnoel




Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-19 Thread fabrice Lig
I have to admit than the first time I hear that track I didn't realize how 
beautiful it was. Now its one of my favourite.
That the story of amazing and timeless tunes... Better and Better with 
years...Like good wine...( french or Australian wine Cyclone, of course ;-)






Fabrice Lig






From: "M : A : T : R : I : X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: Re: (313) At Les
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:40:24 -0500

just this: it instantly makes the rain go away and the sun shines brightly.
day or night.

on 12/16/04 5:18 PM, Ronny Pries at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these words:

> let me think,
>
> instant hard-on
> tear in the left eye
> urgent need to hug someone
>
> forgot something?
>
> rp
>
> Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
>> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
>> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
>> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>>
>> tom
>>
>> 
>> andythepooh.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



_
Faites votre propre homepage http://webbuilder.fr.msn.be



RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Pascal Louwes
To my humble opinion

At Les is one very good example of CCs many techno masterpieces


Nuff said...

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ronny Pries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Verzonden: vrijdag 17 december 2004 21:17
Aan: 313@hyperreal.org
Onderwerp: Re: (313) At Les

Man, that sex must have been the bomb. ;)

Ronny

De Block, Mario wrote:
> it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't 
> know but since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's', hinting 
> at one of Carl's former girlfriends. Then again, being asked for his 
> main inspiration, Carl said, simply, 'sex'.
> M
> 
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" schreef:
> 
> 
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44
>>
>>
>>>did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable
>>
>>really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with 
>>the undying love for this track?
>>
>>Ronny and Sean I salute you!
>>For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.
>>
>>The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version 
>>loses much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 
>>'real instrument' version.
>>
>>Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing 
>>it live.
>>
>>Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a 
>>track that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't 
>>necessarily mean you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want
it.
>>It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with 
>>a piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened 
>>to me many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave 
>>in Scotland a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track 
>>that I'd always thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated 
>>it's repetitiveness was it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me
giggle to this day).
>>(Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
>>thing.)
>>
>>Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!
> 
> 
> 




Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Ronny Pries

Man, that sex must have been the bomb. ;)

Ronny

De Block, Mario wrote:

it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't know but
since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's', hinting at one of Carl's
former girlfriends. Then again, being asked for his main inspiration, Carl
said, simply, 'sex'.
M

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" schreef:




-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44



did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable


really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with the
undying love for this track?

Ronny and Sean I salute you!
For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.

The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version loses
much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 'real
instrument' version.

Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing it
live.

Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a track
that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't necessarily mean
you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want it.
It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with a
piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened to me
many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave in Scotland
a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track that I'd always
thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated it's repetitiveness was
it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me giggle to this day).
(Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
thing.)

Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!






Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread yussel
i never thought saying i like a carl craig record would cause this sort of
meltdown

this list sucks now.



\

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, robin wrote:

>
> oh change the record michael.
>
> no, really, lets talk about records.
>
> tssk
>
> robin...
>
> On 17 Dec 2004, at 11:13, Renegade808 wrote:
>
> >  if someone told me that i don't get "it"  because i dont like a
> > classic
> > track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
> > "__" track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my
> > opinion of thatso why should you care  did i say something to
> > you just go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
> > just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
> > now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the
> > others who feel its there role to protect the innocent
>
>


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread robin


oh change the record michael.

no, really, lets talk about records.

tssk

robin...

On 17 Dec 2004, at 11:13, Renegade808 wrote:

 if someone told me that i don't get "it"  because i dont like a 
classic

track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
"__" track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my
opinion of thatso why should you care  did i say something to
you just go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the
others who feel its there role to protect the innocent




RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Ryan Snowden
Some people will never get it.  It's what separates us from the 99.9% of
commercial wanna-be "it" people :)  I've always been a bit sceptical on the
classics - either you were there or you were not.  It's like watching the
cartoons you did as a kid?

Apart from all this, it's a dead end topic

-Original Message-
From: Renegade808 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 17 December 2004 10:13 PM
To: ha
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) At Les

 if someone told me that i don't get "it"  because i dont like a classic
track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
"__" track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my opinion
of thatso why should you care  did i say something to you just
go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the others
who feel its there role to protect the innocent


michael
www.renegaderhythms.com






>
>
> geesh ... so after your rather successful alex rant you are the new 
> moral watchdog round here eh?
>
> let me see.. geesh  yussel's opinion is not the end all be all 
> opinion for everyone . some agree and i'm sure some obviously 
> don't   GET IT?
>
> jesus christ ... i get told all the time here in vienna that in the 
> anglo-saxon sphere (contrary to for example continental europe), at 
> least in academic circles, debaters are perfectly used to use sharp 
> attacks, absolute negations, controversial statements, though 
> arguments... tough in giving & tough in taking...  so please try to 
> comply and give a fvcking straight retort (softened by irony if you 
> wish & can, hey alex i miss you, get out of your cave!) to an opinion 
> you don't like instead of whining about it's partiality
>
>
>
> Renegade808 wrote:
>
>   At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it 
> and i am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears 
> differently.just because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they 
> don't get it.
>
> and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe 
> this is what you had to do to understand it). the original track 
> is on wax and i would say its a good representation of the 
> track...like i said some feel it and some don't.  i like the track and 
> other CC stuff but i would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if 
> they don't like the same tracks i do..geesh
>
> michael
> www.renegaderhythms.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   what's with the undying love
>
>
> wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?
>
> what's with the "love" of anything you like?
>
> i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as 
> classic as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it 
> with Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song 
> as one of his "standards"
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
>
>
>
>   did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that 
> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has done. 
> whats with the undying love for this track?
>
> tom
>
> 
> andythepooh.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Renegade808
 if someone told me that i don't get "it"  because i dont like a classic
track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
"__" track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my
opinion of thatso why should you care  did i say something to
you just go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the
others who feel its there role to protect the innocent


michael
www.renegaderhythms.com






>
>
> geesh ... so after your rather successful alex rant you are the new
> moral watchdog round here eh?
>
> let me see.. geesh  yussel's opinion is not the end all be all
> opinion for everyone . some agree and i'm sure some obviously don't
>   GET IT?
>
> jesus christ ... i get told all the time here in vienna that in the
> anglo-saxon sphere (contrary to for example continental europe), at
> least in academic circles, debaters are perfectly used to use sharp
> attacks, absolute negations, controversial statements, though
> arguments... tough in giving & tough in taking...  so please try to
> comply and give a fvcking straight retort (softened by irony if you
> wish & can, hey alex i miss you, get out of your cave!) to an
> opinion you don't like instead of whining about it's partiality
>
>
>
> Renegade808 wrote:
>
>   At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and
> i
> am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
> because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.
>
> and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
> is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on wax
> and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said some
> feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
> would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
> tracks i do..geesh
>
> michael
> www.renegaderhythms.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   what's with the undying love
>
>
> wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?
>
> what's with the "love" of anything you like?
>
> i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
> as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
> Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
> of his "standards"
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
>
>
>
>   did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>
> tom
>
> 
> andythepooh.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message-
From: De Block, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

>it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't know
but since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's'
>hinting at one of Carl's former girlfriends.

Hey that's not bugging, it's not something I knew.  And when it comes to
favourite tracks no piece of trivia is too small!

> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" schreef:

"Schreef" (not a word I've heard before, is it a bit like) good grief!

Actually there's some excuse for this, our (my crew here in stick-poking
Manchester UK) night is called 'That Amazing Thing!'
See www.thatamazingthing.com .  Nobody's ever commented on the (admittedly
very short) mixes on here.  Does that mean they suck?
The idea being it would make it sound good as people would have to say
things like "I went to that amazing thing last night".
Yes, we're stupid.



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread De Block, Mario
it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't know but
since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's', hinting at one of Carl's
former girlfriends. Then again, being asked for his main inspiration, Carl
said, simply, 'sex'.
M

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" schreef:

>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44
>
> > did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable
> really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with the
> undying love for this track?
>
> Ronny and Sean I salute you!
> For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.
>
> The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version loses
> much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 'real
> instrument' version.
>
> Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing it
> live.
>
> Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a track
> that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't necessarily mean
> you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want it.
> It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with a
> piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened to me
> many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave in Scotland
> a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track that I'd always
> thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated it's repetitiveness was
> it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me giggle to this day).
> (Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
> thing.)
>
> Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!



RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44

> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable
really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with the
undying love for this track?

Ronny and Sean I salute you!
For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.

The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version loses
much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 'real
instrument' version.

Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing it
live.

Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a track
that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't necessarily mean
you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want it.
It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with a
piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened to me
many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave in Scotland
a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track that I'd always
thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated it's repetitiveness was
it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me giggle to this day).
(Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
thing.)

Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread ha




geesh ... so after your rather successful alex rant you are the new
moral watchdog round here eh?

let me see.. geesh  yussel's opinion is not the end all be all
opinion for everyone . some agree and i'm sure some obviously don't
  GET IT?

jesus christ ... i get told all the time here in vienna that in the
anglo-saxon sphere (contrary to for example continental europe), at
least in academic circles, debaters are perfectly used to use sharp
attacks, absolute negations, controversial statements, though
arguments... tough in giving & tough in taking...  so please try to
comply and give a fvcking straight retort (softened by irony if you
wish & can, hey alex i miss you, get out of your cave!) to an
opinion you don't like instead of whining about it's partiality



Renegade808 wrote:

  At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and i
am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.

and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on wax
and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said some
feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
tracks i do..geesh

michael
www.renegaderhythms.com






  
  

  what's with the undying love
  

wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?

what's with the "love" of anything you like?

i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
of his "standards"



On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:



  did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
done. whats with the undying love for this track?

tom


andythepooh.com





  

  
  
  





Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Dan . Butler
Instant hard-on while hugging someone?
Could be construed as being overly friendly!

cheers,

Dan (who must go and sit down for a while after
two posts to the list in one day!)

--

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:18:59 +0100
To:  313@hyperreal.org
From: Ronny Pries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (313) At Les
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

let me think,

instant hard-on
tear in the left eye
urgent need to hug someone

forgot something?

rp

Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>
> tom
>





Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Ken Odeluga

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:14:57 -0500
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
From: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- Original Message --
From: "M : A : T : R : I : X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


just this: it instantly makes the rain go away and the sun shines

brightly.

day or night.


which version is it that has all these magickal properties? the CC
or the innerzone orchestra one?

tom



I'll say the original purely electronic version ...  is like a song of 
innocence and of experience, in the same breath.


k



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>i only said that to turn the screws since Thomas for some reson 
seems
>exceptionally opposed to the track.

im not opposed to it at all, really. i just cant see why it is 
considered such a classic, it just doesnt have that sound to me. 
im going to go give both versions a listen real quick and ill see 
how i feel about it this time. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Renegade808
i hear yahey at least this time we are all bickering about something
that is very 313 related  :-)


michael

www.renegaderhythms.com




> i only said that to turn the screws since Thomas for some reson seems
> exceptionally opposed to the track.
>
> ah- this is the 313 i know and love.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Renegade808 wrote:
>
>> At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and
>> i
>> am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
>> because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.
>>
>> and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
>> is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on
>> wax
>> and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said
>> some
>> feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
>> would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
>> tracks i do..geesh
>>
>> michael
>> www.renegaderhythms.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>what's with the undying love
>> >
>> > wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?
>> >
>> > what's with the "love" of anything you like?
>> >
>> > i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as
>> classic
>> > as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
>> > Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as
>> one
>> > of his "standards"
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
>> >> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
>> >> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>> >>
>> >> tom
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >> andythepooh.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread yussel
i only said that to turn the screws since Thomas for some reson seems
exceptionally opposed to the track.

ah- this is the 313 i know and love.



On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Renegade808 wrote:

> At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and i
> am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
> because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.
>
> and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
> is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on wax
> and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said some
> feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
> would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
> tracks i do..geesh
>
> michael
> www.renegaderhythms.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >>what's with the undying love
> >
> > wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?
> >
> > what's with the "love" of anything you like?
> >
> > i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
> > as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
> > Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
> > of his "standards"
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
> >
> >> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
> >> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
> >> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
> >>
> >> tom
> >>
> >> 
> >> andythepooh.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-16 Thread Renegade808
At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and i
am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.

and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on wax
and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said some
feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
tracks i do..geesh

michael
www.renegaderhythms.com






>
>>what's with the undying love
>
> wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?
>
> what's with the "love" of anything you like?
>
> i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
> as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
> Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
> of his "standards"
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
>
>> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
>> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
>> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>>
>> tom
>>
>> 
>> andythepooh.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-16 Thread yussel
oh- and if you had seen innerzone perform it as their encore when they
headlined the Montreal Jazz Festival, you might "get it."



On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:

> -- Original Message --
> From: "M : A : T : R : I : X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >just this: it instantly makes the rain go away and the sun shines
> brightly.
> >day or night.
>
> which version is it that has all these magickal properties? the CC
> or the innerzone orchestra one?
>
> tom
>
> 
> andythepooh.com
>
>
>
>
>


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-16 Thread yussel

>what's with the undying love

wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?

what's with the "love" of anything you like?

i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
of his "standards"



On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:

> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>
> tom
>
> 
> andythepooh.com
>
>
>
>
>


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-16 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: "M : A : T : R : I : X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>just this: it instantly makes the rain go away and the sun shines 
brightly.
>day or night.

which version is it that has all these magickal properties? the CC 
or the innerzone orchestra one? 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-16 Thread M : A : T : R : I : X
just this: it instantly makes the rain go away and the sun shines brightly.
day or night.

on 12/16/04 5:18 PM, Ronny Pries at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these words:

> let me think,
> 
> instant hard-on
> tear in the left eye
> urgent need to hug someone
> 
> forgot something?
> 
> rp
> 
> Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
>> did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
>> remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
>> done. whats with the undying love for this track?
>> 
>> tom 
>> 
>> 
>> andythepooh.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-16 Thread Ronny Pries

let me think,

instant hard-on
tear in the left eye
urgent need to hug someone

forgot something?

rp

Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that 
remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has 
done. whats with the undying love for this track? 

tom 



andythepooh.com


 
   



RE: (313) At les

2002-10-24 Thread marsel


the vinyl version wasn't available for a pretty long time,
but about two months ago, there was a limited repress on planet e



At 23-10-2002 +0100 16:46, you wrote:


Its on "more songs about food and revolutionary art"



.. . :: http://nomorewords.net 






RE: (313) At les

2002-10-24 Thread marsel


the vinyl version wasn't available for a pretty long time,
but about two months ago, there was a limited repress on planet e



At 23-10-2002 +0100 16:46, you wrote:


Its on "more songs about food and revolutionary art"

:-Original Message-
:From: Placid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:31 AM
:To: 313
:Subject: (313) At les
:
:Probably my favorite c craig cut..
:
:Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp
:
:Ie  12"
:
:Placid
:--
:http://www.acid-house.net
:
:Everything you wanted to know about acid house



.. . :: http://nomorewords.net 






Re: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread David Gillies
The Russ Gabriel mix also appears on the Ferox compilation "Further
Adventures in Techno Soul".

Gerald said:
> Of course...
>
> It was also released on Innerzone Orchestra - Programmed, and a Russ
> Gariel mix is on the Geology 2 comp., off the top of my head.
>
> G
>
> Placid wrote:
>>
>> Probably my favorite c craig cut..
>>
>> Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp
>>
>> Ie  12"
>>
>> Placid
>> --
>> http://www.acid-house.net
>>
>> Everything you wanted to know about acid house


-- 
dave.




Re: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread Mxyzptlk

I believe it also came up in the Mr. C X-Mix CD.

jeff


At 06:30 PM 10/23/2002, you wrote:

Probably my favorite c craig cut..

Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp

Ie  12"





Re: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread Samu Eilola

 x-mix series, the electronic storm.!k7 044lp.



On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Placid wrote:

> Probably my favorite c craig cut..
> 
> Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp
> 
> Ie  12"
> 
> Placid
> -- 
> http://www.acid-house.net
> 
> Everything you wanted to know about acid house
> 



RE: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread robin pinning

> That compilation has some great classics on it. Speed Jack, Kenny Larkin,
> Teste, Aphex Twin, Quadrant, BC, 69, Insync, Plastikman, u-ziq. Definitely
> worth seeking out.

it is, the pressing isn't too loud tho. which is a shame given the quality
of the tracks

robin...

> > Of course...
> >
> > It was also released on Innerzone Orchestra - Programmed, and a Russ
> > Gariel mix is on the Geology 2 comp., off the top of my head.
>
>
> ...and R&S's 'In Order to Dance Volume V'.
>
> Oh, and BTW, if anyone wanted the crazy £80, or £100 In Order to Dance
> Volume VI on vinyl (I think it has flashing lights or something stupid like
> that - at any rate, very collectible for the collectors out there), I saw it
> at Beano's in Croydon a couple of weeks ago, and I don't think it's going
> anywhere sometime soon. I know this one's pretty hard to find so I thought
> I'd mention. http://www.beanos.co.uk
>
> Tristan
> =
> Text/Mixes: http://phonopsia.tripod.com
> Music: http://www.mp313.com
> Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



RE: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread Robert Taylor
That compilation has some great classics on it. Speed Jack, Kenny Larkin,
Teste, Aphex Twin, Quadrant, BC, 69, Insync, Plastikman, u-ziq. Definitely
worth seeking out.

-Original Message-
From: Tristan Watkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313
Cc: Placid
Subject: Re: (313) At les


- Original Message -
From: "Gerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Cc: "Placid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: (313) At les


> Of course...
>
> It was also released on Innerzone Orchestra - Programmed, and a Russ
> Gariel mix is on the Geology 2 comp., off the top of my head.


...and R&S's 'In Order to Dance Volume V'.

Oh, and BTW, if anyone wanted the crazy £80, or £100 In Order to Dance
Volume VI on vinyl (I think it has flashing lights or something stupid like
that - at any rate, very collectible for the collectors out there), I saw it
at Beano's in Croydon a couple of weeks ago, and I don't think it's going
anywhere sometime soon. I know this one's pretty hard to find so I thought
I'd mention. http://www.beanos.co.uk

Tristan
=
Text/Mixes: http://phonopsia.tripod.com
Music: http://www.mp313.com
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
stated.  This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





RE: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread Robert Taylor
That's an excellent mix - dunno what happened to the cheeky barrowboy since

-Original Message-
From: ollie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Gerald Belanger; 313
Cc: Placid
Subject: Re: (313) At les


Also on XMIX6 Mr. C on K7!

My track is mixed into it.

Cheers,
ollie



> From: Gerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:42:08 -0400
> To: 313 <313@hyperreal.org>
> Cc: Placid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: (313) At les
> 
> Of course...
> 
> It was also released on Innerzone Orchestra - Programmed, and a Russ
> Gariel mix is on the Geology 2 comp., off the top of my head.
> 
> G
> 
> Placid wrote:
>> 
>> Probably my favorite c craig cut..
>> 
>> Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp
>> 
>> Ie  12"
>> 
>> Placid
>> --
>> http://www.acid-house.net
>> 
>> Everything you wanted to know about acid house
> 
> 


Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
stated.  This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread Tristan Watkins
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Cc: "Placid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: (313) At les


> Of course...
>
> It was also released on Innerzone Orchestra - Programmed, and a Russ
> Gariel mix is on the Geology 2 comp., off the top of my head.


...and R&S's 'In Order to Dance Volume V'.

Oh, and BTW, if anyone wanted the crazy £80, or £100 In Order to Dance
Volume VI on vinyl (I think it has flashing lights or something stupid like
that - at any rate, very collectible for the collectors out there), I saw it
at Beano's in Croydon a couple of weeks ago, and I don't think it's going
anywhere sometime soon. I know this one's pretty hard to find so I thought
I'd mention. http://www.beanos.co.uk

Tristan
=
Text/Mixes: http://phonopsia.tripod.com
Music: http://www.mp313.com
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread ollie
Also on XMIX6 Mr. C on K7!

My track is mixed into it.

Cheers,
ollie



> From: Gerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:42:08 -0400
> To: 313 <313@hyperreal.org>
> Cc: Placid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: (313) At les
> 
> Of course...
> 
> It was also released on Innerzone Orchestra - Programmed, and a Russ
> Gariel mix is on the Geology 2 comp., off the top of my head.
> 
> G
> 
> Placid wrote:
>> 
>> Probably my favorite c craig cut..
>> 
>> Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp
>> 
>> Ie  12"
>> 
>> Placid
>> --
>> http://www.acid-house.net
>> 
>> Everything you wanted to know about acid house
> 
> 



RE: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread Neil Wallace

Its on "more songs about food and revolutionary art"

:-Original Message-
:From: Placid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:31 AM
:To: 313
:Subject: (313) At les
:
:Probably my favorite c craig cut..
:
:Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp
:
:Ie  12"
:
:Placid
:--
:http://www.acid-house.net
:
:Everything you wanted to know about acid house




Re: (313) At les

2002-10-23 Thread Gerald
Of course...

It was also released on Innerzone Orchestra - Programmed, and a Russ
Gariel mix is on the Geology 2 comp., off the top of my head.

G

Placid wrote:
> 
> Probably my favorite c craig cut..
> 
> Did it get released on anything other than virtualsex lp
> 
> Ie  12"
> 
> Placid
> --
> http://www.acid-house.net
> 
> Everything you wanted to know about acid house