[ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] OT:DNS SRV resource Kit
DNS is a pretty flexible service, but it would not be a good idea to do it that way if you want reliability in the service that the client receives IMHO. An applet or other redirection type of mechanism would be the better way to do this. Maybe something at the L7 Firewall or the load balancer would work as well? I'd opt for the applet or other mechanism to redirect myself because I typically want the client to know they're being redirected. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 7:08 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:DNS SRV resource Kit Neil, I'm not sure I follow you here. Are you saying people use DNS to do port redirection for requested records? As in, I go and create an alias called ww2 in a domain called xcompany.com and I am able to specify the port and get DNS to inspect a request for ww2.xcompany.com:portABC and redirect the client to the appropriate A record? Am I just reading you upside-down? Sincerely, Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ruston, Neil Sent: Fri 5/13/2005 8:44 AM To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:DNS SRV resource Kit Why not simply add an alias for www.xcompany.com and include the port number. e.g. host: www.xcompany.com alias: ww2.xcompany.com:456 http://www.xcompany.com:456 This is how some ppl have configured DNS and web servers to work correctly when ISPs block port 80. neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Johnson Sent: 13 May 2005 09:40 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] OT:DNS SRV resource Kit Hi All Does anyone know wether IE supports SRV Resource records in DNS. I like to create a DNS entry that includes the port number of the Website on one of my internap IIS boxes. I know I can do this with host headers within IIS but I was wondering wether I could do it so that www.xcompany.com http://www.xcompany.com/ would be redirected to http://server/webiste:456 for example. Thanks in advance Peter Johnson = = This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network. Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure. = = List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership - Solved
I think I found a solution, at least I cannot provoke the error anymore. Tests showed that the error was connected to one DC, every time the false mebership was active it was the latest installed DC that processed the logon. Investigation eventlogs on the DC gave sporadic warnings of group membership cache refresh. I turned off Universal Group Membership Caching, and now all seems to be well :-) What I don't understand is why this setting was influencing a global group, but maybe someone here can enlighten me? Thanks, Ole Thomsen -Original Message- From: Ole Thomsen Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 10:11 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership I am well aware of the fact that group membership is only updated during a new logon. But this false membership can stick for several days, and we reboot the terminal servers every night. My test user were removed from the group two days ago, and still get the GPO applied on some of the servers. As far as I can see the membership is recognized correctly on the network and file servers - just not during logon. Thanks, Ole Thomsen -Original Message- From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 8:42 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership User security tokens are only updated during authentication. This means that if you have a group membership change and then connect to a remote resources you can get that new token if you completely break any previous sessions with the remote resource, then purge your kerberos tickets, and then reconnect to the resource. For interactive logons (i.e. you have a desktop associated with the logon) you need to log off and log on. joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ole Thomsen Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 1:18 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership Environment: Three W2K3 DC's and ten WTS (no SP1), all located on the same subnet. We have GPO's applied based on group membership. A few policies are only intended to be active for some hours, blocking execution of specific applications. After adding the users to the group, the policy is active almost immediately on the terminal servers - but after removing users from the group, the GPO's are still applied on some. GPresult shows that the users are still seen as member of the group, while running MemberOf against every DC says they are not? How can I troubleshoot this further, and where is it possible that the membership is cached? Ole Thomsen List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
I didn't quite follow what you were describing below, but... DNS configuration is the most likely suspect. One of the first things to verify would be to ensure the client is configured to only point to a DNS server(s) that can resolve records in the Domain's DNS zone. Barring that, you'll also need to confirm your DC's are also properly configured, their records exist in DNS, etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cyrus Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 03:11 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership - Solved
That's because Universal Group Membership Caching also caches global groups. Didn't its name make that obvious? ; You don't want to enable it in a Site that has both GC's and non-GC's or you'll run into the behavior you observed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ole Thomsen Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 09:00 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership - Solved I think I found a solution, at least I cannot provoke the error anymore. Tests showed that the error was connected to one DC, every time the false mebership was active it was the latest installed DC that processed the logon. Investigation eventlogs on the DC gave sporadic warnings of group membership cache refresh. I turned off Universal Group Membership Caching, and now all seems to be well :-) What I don't understand is why this setting was influencing a global group, but maybe someone here can enlighten me? Thanks, Ole Thomsen -Original Message- From: Ole Thomsen Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 10:11 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership I am well aware of the fact that group membership is only updated during a new logon. But this false membership can stick for several days, and we reboot the terminal servers every night. My test user were removed from the group two days ago, and still get the GPO applied on some of the servers. As far as I can see the membership is recognized correctly on the network and file servers - just not during logon. Thanks, Ole Thomsen -Original Message- From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 8:42 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership User security tokens are only updated during authentication. This means that if you have a group membership change and then connect to a remote resources you can get that new token if you completely break any previous sessions with the remote resource, then purge your kerberos tickets, and then reconnect to the resource. For interactive logons (i.e. you have a desktop associated with the logon) you need to log off and log on. joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ole Thomsen Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 1:18 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Sticky group membership Environment: Three W2K3 DC's and ten WTS (no SP1), all located on the same subnet. We have GPO's applied based on group membership. A few policies are only intended to be active for some hours, blocking execution of specific applications. After adding the users to the group, the policy is active almost immediately on the terminal servers - but after removing users from the group, the GPO's are still applied on some. GPresult shows that the users are still seen as member of the group, while running MemberOf against every DC says they are not? How can I troubleshoot this further, and where is it possible that the membership is cached? Ole Thomsen List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
[ActiveDir] Telnet Service Disappeaars after installing Wwin2k3 SP1
Hello all, I have a winsk3 box and I need to make use of the telnet service, so after installing the box I enable the telnet service and make it automatic because the service is disabled by default. I then install windows 2003 SP1 and then I notice that the telnet service disappears from the services window without any trace. If I try to utilize the service I cant Does any one have any sorta work around on this issue List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
Tom, Now that pretty strange..the view that I have is as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; on behalf of; [EMAIL PROTECTED] And that's my corp's smtp relay, a spam indeed? Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security) Spherion Technology Group, Singapore For Agilent Technologies E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:44 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] GPO not applied - thinks it is empty
Just getting back to this thread and having a chance to write up some thoughts. It's splintered some, I'll go from here, because it seems to be a good place to fork this mail from. A bunch of points worth commenting on: I would like MS to put out guidance on making services with self setting passwords as well as any services they have that require userids doing the same. Yes, we know, and we're working on such things. We're also working on how to better manage such passwords going forward. Additionally there are more forests and domains in that company than probably any where else. Many of them probably make sense like for the Windows groups working on the AD product, but I expect many of them don't make any sense, it is just people who want their own and want control over their own machines so make them and use them. Joe, no such forest mayhem exists. All of our production forests exist for the purposes of testing scenarios and gaining confidence in alpha/beta grade bits before going full production with them. And there are fewer forests here than I would actually expect, and then I think you think there are. There are many untrusted forests, much like you might have a forest running on your desktop in virtual machines. But they don't really count, I was speaking more to production forests that are trusted by the core production environment. The # is not huge in the production boat. But that said, this all seems like a diversion from the original issue? Getting back to the original issue, on secure resetting passwords of local machines more generally This comment was made: I used to store the password in the batch file before I got my brains bashed out on this list. So, I went back and store the password in a DB, read it on the fly from a vbs and pass it onto bat. This approach does not make it fundamentally better than sitting naked in a .bat file, though it does remove the low hanging fruit, a little. The question is, _under what security context_ does this VBS run (which answers the question, what context do I need to compromise to get the password?) and where is that password shared? If it runs as local system on a workstation, that implies that local system can read the password - if I become local system I can read the password - if I am admin on the machine I can read the password. This is just as concerning to me, depending upon the implementation. One implementation detail that could make this interesting would be if your db handed out a unique password to each workstation, and no workstation security context could read the password for any other workstation (record-level security could be used). Then you have limited my knowledge to the scope of what I already ownI can only read a password I don't care about, because I already own that box. If that's how you do it, you've solved part of the problem. Read below for more generic commentary on why this, especially bullet 2. If you want to test my ability to do this, give me admin on one of your boxes one day (and a kernel remote too, just in case I feel like being fancy), and I can try and obtain your password. I'd bet you a lunch (to be settled next time you're in the Seattle area) that I can get it. Fundamentally, to me, there are a few issues that need to be overcome in any solution I'd personally consider secure end to end: - You need to securely send the password to the machine, else a network sniff will reveal it - You need to establish trust boundaries within your environment, and not overlap password usage across such boundaries (nor ability for a machine in one realm to read the password in another realm). That is, if you have MachineA and MachineB, and you don't assume that anyone that is admin over MachineA should be admin over MachineB, you should not use the same password on both of them. Else compromise of one of them compromises both of them. In reality, this probably is best implemented with every machine having a unique local admin password. Why is this concept of boundaries so impt? Because there's really no trusted way of setting the password on a given machine and using it w/o exposing it to someone that has compromised that box. So no matter how you store, how you use, etc.someone who owns that box will own that password. It might not be true, but it could be, so you should assume it. That takes us to the place where, unique passwords for trust realms are required. - You need to securely store the passwords of the machines before, during, and after they have been used. - You need to have a mechanism by which you can check out passwords to people that need them such that you know A) who has gotten the password to a given machine B) when they got it C) when they are done with it and D) a mechanism to reset that password so that the knowledge of the local admin password in question is not forever-lasting after a single checkout. - Of course, the
RE: [ActiveDir] Sites and Folder Redirection | more
Thank you, Dan. This topic is sort of haunting me. It seems like something that almost everyone has to deal with. So if you use advanced folder redirection, what keeps the redirection from happening over the WAN? Are you using this in conjunction with offline files? In this context, I am not sure I see how OUs would be different than Groups either way the policy is going to be applied regardless of what Site they sit in. Finally, you mentioned using DFS. I believe this would allow a single namespace called company.com\home. Could you elaborate on how you are using this for redirection. Thanks again. -- nme From: Dan Holme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:22 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites and Folder Redirection | more I have not seen a reply to this thread so I thought I might pitch in my thoughts: In my geographically distributed clients, we face the same problem. We address it using global groups to represent the geographic location of users. If a user is transferred to another site (location) we change their global group membership. The global group is used either to filter a GPO redirecting folders to a specific server (or via a site-related DFS link) or the groups are used in a single GPO to create advanced folder redirection, whereby you can point groups to different servers. That way, traveling users, dial-in users, etc. were accessing their folder-redirected-folders in their home server we didnt want to replicate tons of user data in those environments just for the few So to make a long story short, we just didnt use site-linked GPOs for anything to do with user data. Also made it much easier on the help desk issues, since help desk could change the membership of these location-related global groups easily. Dan Holme Intelliem From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:31 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Sites and Folder Redirection | more Hello: I am working with redirecting My Documents in various sites. I have some follow up questions to the thread I started a few months ago. Some sites have poor connectivity. There is no replication of data between sites (for home directories). Laptop users use Offline Files. Single domain, W2k. All redirection is handled via User GPOs. The root Home directory resides on a file server at each site; users at that site point there based on the GPO. Security is defined as per MSKB 274443. Where to apply the GPO? As Aric pointed out, applied at the Site level will cause users to redirect to the local Home share when they just drop by with their laptops. What happens to Offline Files in this case? It seems better to create OUs for uses at each Site and apply the GPO there. Under this scenario, would Slow Link Detection prevent the redirection from trying to find Home over the slow WAN link? Would it then just resort to Offline Files? Finally, if we use DFS to create a unified namespace, all user home directories would be created under a single Home directory. Without folder replication, how would we control the Site and file server where the folder actually gets created? Many TIA. -- nme
RE: [ActiveDir] Sites and Folder Redirection | more
I have not seen a reply to this thread so I thought I might pitch in my thoughts: In my geographically distributed clients, we face the same problem. We address it using global groups to represent the geographic location of users. If a user is transferred to another site (location) we change their global group membership. The global group is used either to filter a GPO redirecting folders to a specific server (or via a site-related DFS link) or the groups are used in a single GPO to create advanced folder redirection, whereby you can point groups to different servers. That way, traveling users, dial-in users, etc. were accessing their folder-redirected-folders in their home server we didnt want to replicate tons of user data in those environments just for the few So to make a long story short, we just didnt use site-linked GPOs for anything to do with user data. Also made it much easier on the help desk issues, since help desk could change the membership of these location-related global groups easily. Dan Holme Intelliem From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:31 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Sites and Folder Redirection | more Hello: I am working with redirecting My Documents in various sites. I have some follow up questions to the thread I started a few months ago. Some sites have poor connectivity. There is no replication of data between sites (for home directories). Laptop users use Offline Files. Single domain, W2k. All redirection is handled via User GPOs. The root Home directory resides on a file server at each site; users at that site point there based on the GPO. Security is defined as per MSKB 274443. Where to apply the GPO? As Aric pointed out, applied at the Site level will cause users to redirect to the local Home share when they just drop by with their laptops. What happens to Offline Files in this case? It seems better to create OUs for uses at each Site and apply the GPO there. Under this scenario, would Slow Link Detection prevent the redirection from trying to find Home over the slow WAN link? Would it then just resort to Offline Files? Finally, if we use DFS to create a unified namespace, all user home directories would be created under a single Home directory. Without folder replication, how would we control the Site and file server where the folder actually gets created? Many TIA. -- nme
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
this is what i see( i cut out my part of the headers. you'll see [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't rewrite sender addresses incoming so i don't know why it would end up like this)- Received: from mail.activedir.org (ftp.activedir.org [12.168.66.190]) by mta1.charmer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D7C284077 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:54:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ams007.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.155] by mail.activedir.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.11) id ACD581CB006C; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:27:33 -0400 Received: by ams007.ftl.affinity.com id 359462-28812; Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:32 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at charmer.com Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2005 22:29:13.0104 (UTC) FILETIME=[854C6100:01C5599D] thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 7:13 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Tom, Now that pretty strange..the view that I have is as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; on behalf of; [EMAIL PROTECTED] And that's my corp's smtp relay, a spam indeed? Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security) Spherion Technology Group, Singapore For Agilent Technologies E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:44 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
The address is actually coming in as a local address (i.e., just cyrus) with no domain-part. He probably has a misconfigured Outlook Express or Eudora. Your local MTA or your MUA is adding the domain-part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:00 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? this is what i see( i cut out my part of the headers. you'll see [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't rewrite sender addresses incoming so i don't know why it would end up like this)- Received: from mail.activedir.org (ftp.activedir.org [12.168.66.190]) by mta1.charmer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D7C284077 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:54:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ams007.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.155] by mail.activedir.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.11) id ACD581CB006C; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:27:33 -0400 Received: by ams007.ftl.affinity.com id 359462-28812; Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:32 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at charmer.com Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2005 22:29:13.0104 (UTC) FILETIME=[854C6100:01C5599D] thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 7:13 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Tom, Now that pretty strange..the view that I have is as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; on behalf of; [EMAIL PROTECTED] And that's my corp's smtp relay, a spam indeed? Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security) Spherion Technology Group, Singapore For Agilent Technologies E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:44 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
my MUA is Outlook. I'm pretty sure, Outlook doesn't do that.. Could be my mta. I use Postfix, but as i recall you have to specifically create a lookup table for that and i never did. and Exchange 2k never does that AFAIK. oh, well. i'll take a look. thanks -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:18 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? The address is actually coming in as a local address (i.e., just cyrus) with no domain-part. He probably has a misconfigured Outlook Express or Eudora. Your local MTA or your MUA is adding the domain-part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:00 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? this is what i see( i cut out my part of the headers. you'll see [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't rewrite sender addresses incoming so i don't know why it would end up like this)- Received: from mail.activedir.org (ftp.activedir.org [12.168.66.190]) by mta1.charmer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D7C284077 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:54:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ams007.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.155] by mail.activedir.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.11) id ACD581CB006C; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:27:33 -0400 Received: by ams007.ftl.affinity.com id 359462-28812; Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:32 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at charmer.com Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2005 22:29:13.0104 (UTC) FILETIME=[854C6100:01C5599D] thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 7:13 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Tom, Now that pretty strange..the view that I have is as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; on behalf of; [EMAIL PROTECTED] And that's my corp's smtp relay, a spam indeed? Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security) Spherion Technology Group, Singapore For Agilent Technologies E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:44 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
Nope, it's a fair bet that neither Outlook 2003 nor Exchange 2003 do that - because that is what I'm running. His postings just show as cyrus here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:44 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? my MUA is Outlook. I'm pretty sure, Outlook doesn't do that.. Could be my mta. I use Postfix, but as i recall you have to specifically create a lookup table for that and i never did. and Exchange 2k never does that AFAIK. oh, well. i'll take a look. thanks -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:18 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? The address is actually coming in as a local address (i.e., just cyrus) with no domain-part. He probably has a misconfigured Outlook Express or Eudora. Your local MTA or your MUA is adding the domain-part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:00 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? this is what i see( i cut out my part of the headers. you'll see [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't rewrite sender addresses incoming so i don't know why it would end up like this)- Received: from mail.activedir.org (ftp.activedir.org [12.168.66.190]) by mta1.charmer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D7C284077 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:54:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ams007.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.155] by mail.activedir.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.11) id ACD581CB006C; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:27:33 -0400 Received: by ams007.ftl.affinity.com id 359462-28812; Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:32 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at charmer.com Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2005 22:29:13.0104 (UTC) FILETIME=[854C6100:01C5599D] thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 7:13 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Tom, Now that pretty strange..the view that I have is as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; on behalf of; [EMAIL PROTECTED] And that's my corp's smtp relay, a spam indeed? Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security) Spherion Technology Group, Singapore For Agilent Technologies E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:44 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
Postfix it is :) Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security) Spherion Technology Group, Singapore For Agilent Technologies E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:54 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Nope, it's a fair bet that neither Outlook 2003 nor Exchange 2003 do that - because that is what I'm running. His postings just show as cyrus here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:44 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? my MUA is Outlook. I'm pretty sure, Outlook doesn't do that.. Could be my mta. I use Postfix, but as i recall you have to specifically create a lookup table for that and i never did. and Exchange 2k never does that AFAIK. oh, well. i'll take a look. thanks -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:18 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? The address is actually coming in as a local address (i.e., just cyrus) with no domain-part. He probably has a misconfigured Outlook Express or Eudora. Your local MTA or your MUA is adding the domain-part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 8:00 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? this is what i see( i cut out my part of the headers. you'll see [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't rewrite sender addresses incoming so i don't know why it would end up like this)- Received: from mail.activedir.org (ftp.activedir.org [12.168.66.190]) by mta1.charmer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D7C284077 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:54:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ams007.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.155] by mail.activedir.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.11) id ACD581CB006C; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:27:33 -0400 Received: by ams007.ftl.affinity.com id 359462-28812; Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:32 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 04:10:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at charmer.com Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2005 22:29:13.0104 (UTC) FILETIME=[854C6100:01C5599D] thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 7:13 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? Tom, Now that pretty strange..the view that I have is as below: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; on behalf of; [EMAIL PROTECTED] And that's my corp's smtp relay, a spam indeed? Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono Windows Administrator (ADSM/NT Security) Spherion Technology Group, Singapore For Agilent Technologies E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:44 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info :
RE: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services
Nope - it's still in beta. Final stages, but still not released. -rtk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:29 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services Greetings, Does any one know if Microsoft Audit Collection Services has been released yet? I attended a Microsoft TechNet Briefing and the stated that it would be out some time last year, is any one using it? Sincerely, Jose Medeiros 408-449-6621 Cell Sincerely, Jose Medeiros 408-449-6621 Cell List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services
I thought it was dropped - maybe not, however. I seem to remember seeing in - I think - one of Paul T.'s write-ups that the ACS piece in R2 had been dropped. For now - at least. -rtk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis Ouellet Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:39 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services I'm still in the beta and no, no release yet. And no activity as well. Francis P.S. I think some of the functionality is built-in R2. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose Sent: May 13, 2005 11:29 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services Greetings, Does any one know if Microsoft Audit Collection Services has been released yet? I attended a Microsoft TechNet Briefing and the stated that it would be out some time last year, is any one using it? Sincerely, Jose Medeiros 408-449-6621 Cell Sincerely, Jose Medeiros 408-449-6621 Cell List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services
Sadly, the beta for ACS has been closed for a VERY long time. This close to what might be a release, I suspect that there will not be any opportunity to get in on the beta. However, check with your local MS folks and see if they can get you the bits. -rtk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:46 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Cc: Jose Medeiros-Gmail (E-mail) Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services Hi Francis, Thank you for the reply. We would like to test this in our QA LAB is there any way I can participate in the Beta program? Sincerely, Jose Medeiros Former Vice President and Postmaster NTEA MCP+I, MCSE, NT4 MCT www.ntea.net www.tvnug.org www.sfntug.org -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Francis Ouellet Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 8:39 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services I'm still in the beta and no, no release yet. And no activity as well. Francis P.S. I think some of the functionality is built-in R2. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose Sent: May 13, 2005 11:29 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Audit Collection Services Greetings, Does any one know if Microsoft Audit Collection Services has been released yet? I attended a Microsoft TechNet Briefing and Microsoft stated that it would be out some time last year, is any one using it? Sincerely, Jose Medeiros 408-449-6621 Cell Sincerely, Jose Medeiros 408-449-6621 Cell List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
Re: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ?
greetings, what is going on, why sender name became [EMAIL PROTECTED] how this happen, could there a worm in .org waiting to Xplode? I think it best bet to discontinue with this activeDir...and wait for a better improvement (i.e. www.codeguru.com) any suggest how I can stop it. thanks cyrus Kern, Tom writes: I think this is a good reason to use SPF on mailing lists. Charmer.com is my corps domain. i don't know why this indvidual is spoofing his return address. i know there's been a spate of German right wing spam lately on a lot of mailing lists. I don't know if this has anything to do with it... thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] joining domain is not easy ? greetings, this always my nightmare, everytime i connect a new computer to network to join the domain either i get his message THE NETWORK PATH WAS NOT FOUND or CANNOT JOIN THE DOMAIN. I've check the IP and did a Ping on it and everything looks fine, when I set the workstation to hookup to our LAN internet it responded well, but when I need to join the domain it is very Annoying it just can not join the domain. I even configured it as a workgroup then configure it as joining a domain, still wont join. BUT if i remove the IP address and join to the old server first then put back the IP address and do the joining to the new server domain IT WORKS. why and how I dont have any idea. If needed for me to detail my problem by phone tell me. rgds cyrus List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
