Re: [AFMUG] It's time for a second SSID on the Air Routers and Air Gateways.
somthing newer then busybox linux had? On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote: What kernel was Mikrotik using 10 years ago? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- *From: *timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Wednesday, December 31, 2014 3:12:00 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] It's time for a second SSID on the Air Routers and AirGateways. last I heard they needed to update the Kernal to get multi SSID's to work I think they did not in 5.6Beta but I'm sure they want to get 5.6 Final out fast as they can Multi SSID's i'm sure will get more antenntion after 5.6 final is out its on beta6 right now.. On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:42 AM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote: UBNT amazes me with this, Im pretty sure the multi ESSID thread is the longest running active thread on their forum, yet they cant do it. Users have found ways to somewhat get it to happen, but not cleanly, but they dont have programmatic access to the device I know this is not a complicated thing, almost every single wireless product on the market these days supports it in some form or another. I could see hiding behind the well, it wont work with our proprietary wireless algorithm I can see that on the commercial side, but the home devices? I doubt anyone on this list is turning that on on airrouters or gateways for customers since most customers end devices arent ubiquiti products. I think they dont do it strictly out of spite now On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote: They'll say, We weren't aware anyone wanted that. That's what the vendors say when they don't want to actually tell us why they haven't done something. I haven't been too excited about multi-SSID in the macro network, but auto-associated and provisioned CPE would be nice. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- *From: *Mark Radabaugh via Af af@afmug.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:53:17 AM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] It's time for a second SSID on the Air Routers and AirGateways. Make that on all of the products. Two SSID’s on the AP - a ‘install’ SSID that the CPE can associate to by default, and a ‘sector’ SSID that we use to lock the CPE to the sector once it’s installed. What is so hard about this? Cisco Aironet AP's could do this 15 years ago. Mark On Dec 31, 2014, at 8:48 AM, joseph marsh via Af af@afmug.com wrote: +1 On Dec 30, 2014 11:29 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote: As much as I’d like to stay with those devices, lack of a second SSID for guests for example, is becoming a problem. I had 3 people in the last 2 weeks ask for this feature and I don’t disagree with them. Come on guys, we’ve been asking for this for 5 years. It’s time. Rory Conaway Triad Wireless 4226 S. 37th Street Phoenix, Az. 85040 602-426-0542 r...@triadwireless.net www.triadwireless.net “Mediocrity finds safety in standardization. -- Frederick Crane” -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] hmmmm.....whats wrong with this ap eval?
924mhz 1 has a different Becon version are you having sync issues? Also you are using 906 913 915 924 that's seems odd — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Range 0 feet? From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:13 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] h.whats wrong with this ap eval? You divided by color code zero and got a color code 57 somehow. On 12/29/2014 9:00 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af wrote: � � anyone?� anyone? :) � � AP Selection Method used: Optimize for Throughput Current entry index: 0 Session Status: REGISTERED (via Primary Color Code 0) * Index: 0 Frequency: 906.00 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-91-13-95 Region: United States Jitter: 5 Power Level: -67 dBm Beacon Count: 19 BRcvW: 1 FECEn: 0 Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 3 Range: 54243 feet MaxRange: 25 miles TxBER: 1 EBcast: 0 Session Count: 17 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0 SMLimitReached: 0 NoVC's: 0 VCRsvFail: 0 VCActFail: 0 FrameNumber: 529 SectorID: 0 Color Code: 0 BeaconVersion: 0 SectorUserCount: 9 NumULHalfSlots: 11 NumDLHalfSlots: 33 NumULContSlots: 3 WhiteSched: 0 ICC: 0 Authentication: Disabled SM PPPoE: Supported * Index: 1 Frequency: 913.00 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-91-b5-51 Region: United States Jitter: 4 Power Level: -82 dBm Beacon Count: 12 BRcvW: 1 FECEn: 0 Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 0 feet MaxRange: 25 miles TxBER: 1 EBcast: 0 Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0 SMLimitReached: 0 NoVC's: 0 VCRsvFail: 0 VCActFail: 0 FrameNumber: 1139 SectorID: 0 Color Code: 57 BeaconVersion: 0 SectorUserCount: 7 NumULHalfSlots: 11 NumDLHalfSlots: 33 NumULContSlots: 3 WhiteSched: 0 ICC: 0 Authentication: Disabled SM PPPoE: Supported * Index: 2 Frequency: 924.00 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-91-27-05 Region: United States Jitter: 5 Power Level: -84 dBm Beacon Count: 3 BRcvW: 1 FECEn: 0 Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 3 Range: 0 feet MaxRange: 25 miles TxBER: 1 EBcast: 0 Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0 SMLimitReached: 0 NoVC's: 0 VCRsvFail: 0 VCActFail: 0 FrameNumber: 662 SectorID: 0 Color Code: 0 BeaconVersion: 1 SectorUserCount: 0 NumULHalfSlots: 11 NumDLHalfSlots: 33 NumULContSlots: 3 SM PPPoE: Supported * Index: 3 Frequency: 915.00 MHz ESN: 0a-00-3e-90-23-93 Region: United States Jitter: 5 Power Level: -83 dBm Beacon Count: 11 BRcvW: 1 FECEn: 0 Type: Multipoint Avail: 1 Age: 0 Lockout: 0 RegFail 0 Range: 0 feet MaxRange: 25 miles TxBER: 1 EBcast: 0 Session Count: 0 NoLUIDS: 0 OutOfRange: 0 AuthFail: 0 EncryptFail: 0 Rescan Req: 0 SMLimitReached: 0 NoVC's: 0 VCRsvFail: 0 VCActFail: 0 FrameNumber: 1973 SectorID: 0 Color Code: 0 BeaconVersion: 0 SectorUserCount: 7 NumULHalfSlots: 11 NumDLHalfSlots: 33 NumULContSlots: 3 WhiteSched: 0 ICC: 0 Authentication: Disabled SM PPPoE: Supported
[AFMUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK
Just ran into a ATT microcell that would not work with the SM in NAT mode routers WAN was on a DMZ IP anyone else run into this? Thanks — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK
Thanks guys LAN IP on our SMs are 172.16.x.x not 192.168.x.x — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Is LAN IP 192.168.100.x? From: timothy steele via Af Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 12:13 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Micro cell with NAT mode FSK Just ran into a ATT microcell that would not work with the SM in NAT mode routers WAN was on a DMZ IP anyone else run into this? Thanks — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report
I would see if you can find any use NETEQ's — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 2:26 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote: This is a sample base report from the one at my house, I dont have a maintenance contract and its old hardware and locked in old firmware so little of it works for the reporting. but this is the default cloud report. Our contract customers who choose to maintain their maintenance agreements can do alot more, like AD integration, all that good stuff. We have done managed office firewalls with these, but normally we just try to get the customer under a managed services contract. We have dropped them in on a couple residential customers networks long enough to pull reports, but its a risk to have money at a residence that is already abusing the system On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:17 PM, That One Guy thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: yes, with the maintenance contract you can get as detailed as you want without you can only do the source/dest IP/port but not identification of the traffic type If you have it at a POP just create a policy (in and out) specific to the monitored customer and make sure those policies are logging all traffic. I believe the 60 series does not have internal storage, the higher series do. but you can send to syslog and one of the open source ones, i dont recall which, has fortigate specific reporting Its pretty slick, especially for office environments, the generic cloud reporting keeps customers happy On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Wireless Admin via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Does FortiOS provide detailed report on Internet usage? Sorry for the question but I don’t have any experience with this system. Steve B. -- *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy via Af *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 2:04 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report we are looking at putting 60d and 90d in as our site/POP routers. It will give us more visibility on the network. It does require a service contract for advanced features and reporting. There are a couple syslog servers I guess that can format the reports on these On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, That One Guy thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.avfirewalls.com/?gclid=Cj0KEQiAq_SkBRC3jLvJ1IPt2eIBEiQASUZy1z9JetUR94rPQ3lbbwki727bo9hzSXDX33upLwc2LkEaAiBm8P8HAQ On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Wireless Admin via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Is there a low end unit that can do this? Any Idea what price range? Steve B -- *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy via Af *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 12:37 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report A Fortigate will do that. you can even cobble it down to showing what user is logged in and what theyre doing On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote: You could put in one of the Mikrotik routers that have the LCD and lock it to displaying the WAN side bandwidth graph. It won’t tell them what is using all the bandwidth, but they can certainly go around shutting stuff off to see what is causing the usage. Like oh, it went down when I shut off the satellite TV receiver, I didn’t know that used the Internet. Or look, it goes up whenever my daughter uses Facetime, that uses the Internet? Or we all clicked to upgrade our iOS versions and the graph has been pegged for the last day, meanwhile my Xbox games are lagging. *From:* Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 11:29 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report Powercode does bits down to the minute. If you want more detailed you'll probably need ntop or Procera. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 26, 2014 12:01 PM, Wireless Admin via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Can anyone suggest a system that would allow an ISP to provide a customer a detailed report on Internet usage. I’m talking about the ability to show a customer, on usage based billing, what caused the consumption. My thought would be to route the customers IP through a specialized process for a limited period of time so details could be collected. A sort of debug mode. Steve B -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a
Re: [AFMUG] Omni + Ice
Heat tape?http://www.heat-trace.co.uk/Products/Self-Regulating_Heaters/Freezstop_Micro_FSM — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I doubt it causes any signal reduction assuming you just apply a layer. Putting a pallet of material in front would be bad. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 23, 2014 5:58 PM, Brian Sullivan via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I'm using Never Wet on a couple of AirFiber24's. I have tried sex wax on stinger antennas with no luck. The bag idea is good. Any degraded performance I would notice? On 12/23/2014 4:51 PM, Josh Luthman via Af wrote: Hefty garbage bag. Sex wax (surf board stuff) Might try that neverwet Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 23, 2014 5:49 PM, Brian Sullivan via Af af@afmug.com wrote: It seems like a couple times over the winter we have ice that covers a side of our omni antennas. It's only a handful of customers that directly face the iced up side of the omni that have degraded signals. We usually only have an issue when rain slowly switches to ice and then snow. It will either take a tower climb or wait for warmer temps to melt said ice. What measures has anyone here on the list taken to prevent this condition?
Re: [AFMUG] ePMP SNMP Location
Of not there these OID's might work for ePMPhttp://glr81.free.fr/pages/openwrt-snmp-oid.htm — Sent from Mailbox On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Josh Luthman via Af af@afmug.com wrote: There's a great SNMP website for all Cambium stuff. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 21, 2014 7:58 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Does the ePMP not expose the SNMP Location that Mikrotik and Ubiquiti (and my Linux servers) do? It's not showing up in my monitoring program (Observium). - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL
Re: [AFMUG] DC Power Plug
Try Frys electronic — Sent from Mailbox On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Mike, I just wanted to let you know that I just heard back from my engineers on this. Apparently the information that we have on file is incorrect the correct measurement is actually 3.5mm x 1.35mm. I do apologize for the delay in response. Much Thanks, - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net To: Animal Farm af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 9:37:29 AM Subject: DC Power Plug Does anyone know where I can find a standard 4.0 x 1.3mm 12 Volt power port, preferably with a pigtail? It's for the screen trigger output on an InFocus projector. That's what InFocus support said I needed to use and that it's available in any local electronics store. Well, it's not at Radio Shack. Google sure isn't being a lot of help either. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Re: [AFMUG] OT animation software
These guys look really cheap probably your best bet.. http://www.fiverr.com/yuen1985/create-a-60-seconds-high-quality-explainer-video-in-hd — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Looking at a video to educate new customers, specifically about the limitations of wireless routers. Right now I am checking out moovly. From: Ken Hohhof via Af Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:02 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT animation software You don’t ask for much, do you? Easy, cheap, and I suppose you also want good? Maybe contract out to Next Media Animation, the place that does the animated news videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/tomonewsus Are you wanting to produce Flash animations, like for websites, or actual videos like for Youtube? I seem to remember there was some website that would let you create animations of talking heads speaking your words, like narration for an instructional video, I don’t remember the name of the service though. From: Chuck McCown via Af Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:27 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT animation software Looking for recommendations for animation software that does not have a steep learning curve and hopefully is free or low cost.
Re: [AFMUG] Sync on UBNT Titanium
Only way to get sync to work on UBNT gear that I have found is the stuff bitlomat is working on — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af af@afmug.com wrote: We had an implementation of UBNT sync that was less than favorable. 3 links in the same 90 degree plane...it helped slightly, reduced total throughput, channel management still had to be done, and true Cambium-style sync was never achieved. It never worked in 2.4GHz IMO. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Caleb Knauer via Af af@afmug.com wrote: If you two kids don't stop fighting I swear to god I'm pulling over this car and slapping you with my ring hand. On Saturday, November 22, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Your cable and DSL is a lot slower and more expensive than it is here. The physics are easier to accomplish when you don't have to move as many bits through the air. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL -- *From: *Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Saturday, November 22, 2014 3:13:19 AM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Sync on UBNT Titanium That's fine. We'll go back to running the same wisp that is taking both the cable co and clec's in-town customers and has been for the past 10 years... without sync. On 11/21/2014 06:39 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: Those are very compelling, but not enough bits without bigger channels, which then need sync. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL -- *From: *Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Friday, November 21, 2014 7:19:14 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Sync on UBNT Titanium Or you can swap it out with -AC and get 65Mbps on a 10MHz channel, realtime airview, and much better selectivity :P On 11/21/2014 03:10 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: you can swap it all out with epmp On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote: It may work, but it will tank your throughput. On 11/21/2014 01:32 PM, Jerry Richardson via Af wrote: Has anyone successfully implemented? � Jerry -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
Re: [AFMUG] ubnt test2.cgi stress test?
Your leaving a lot of info out..
What antenna are you using?
What radio are you using?
What speeds are you expecting to see
What type of cable did you use
Did you test the BH
Did you test the cable on AP and BH
Did you test switch ports the AP and BH are plugged into?
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com
wrote:
#!/sbin/cgi
?
include(lib/settings.inc);
if ($action!=test) {
if ($feature_poe_passthrough == 1) {
if (!isset($poe_test)) {
$poe_test=on;
}
}
if (!isset($stress_test)) {
$stress_test=on;
}
}
if (!isset($poe_cnt)) {
$poe_cnt=10;
}
if (!isset($stress_dur)) {
$stress_dur=5;
}
POE related. There is no temp sensor in UBNT gear.
On 11/18/2014 08:00 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
anybody know what this does?
I have an AP that has 6 clients, 5hz channels, decent links for all,
the AP is reachable fine, but the clients are all having throughput
problems and most of the time are inaccessible
Im wondering if the AP hasnt gotten too cold so Ive been trying to
force it to heat up, running the builtin speedtest to the colocated AP
browsing the /usr/www folder there is the test.cgi and the test2.cgi,
test2 lets you initiate a stress test, I dont know what that does, but
top shows the processor in heavy use. I assume this would generate heat.
Does ubnt have any temp sensor?
what does this stress test actually do?
I do not want to climb up and replace this AP today, I left my heavy
pants at home
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if
you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all
means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
--
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
[AFMUG] Hopland and Philo CA WISP?
Comcast is posting on the UBNT forum looking to partner with a WISP in CA.. http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Business-Talk/Northern-California-WISP-needed/m-p/1106571#M41294 — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] Ap resetting after upgrading to 13.2
0800076c 113 23 0800076c 114 51 0800054c 115 5 0800076c 116 6 0800076c 117 28 0800076c 118 51 0800054c 119 18 0800076c 120 23 0800076c 121 51 0800054c 122 28 0800076c 123 51 0800054c 124 27 0800076c 125 51 0800054c 126 18 0800076c 127 23 0800076c 128 51 0800054c 129 28 0800076c 130 51 0800054c 131 18 0800076c 132 23 0800076c 133 51 0800054c 134 28 0800076c 135 51 0800054c 136 5 0800076c 137 6 0800076c 138 51 0800054c 139 18 0800076c 140 23 0800076c 141 16 0800076c 142 23 0800076c 143 16 0800076c 144 23 0800076c 145 34 0800076c 146 39 0800076c 147 50 0800076c 148 51 0800054c 149 28 0800076c 150 51 0800054c 151 18 0800076c 152 23 0800076c 153 51 0800054c 154 28 0800076c 155 51 0800054c 156 18 0800076c 157 23 0800076c 158 51 0800054c 159 28 0800076c 160 51 0800054c 161 Task PROX - Priority 51 Indx=0 LUID=45 cs=0x2534330 e=0 cp=49795 ss=0x253a2e4 e= 0 sp=3919 lt=1882108 ct=1885291 REGS: 0x0800054c 0x009f190c 0x009f1c0c 0x00a372dc 0x0002 0x0001 0x00a36c88 0x 0xc0a88c24 0x 0x009f1c3c 0x0253d9d4 0x0344 0x04a7 0x 0x0079 0x0001 0x0011 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x009f1984 0x0088 0x002fa1f8 0x0006 0xdeadbeef 0xadbeefde 0xbeefdead 0x0253d9d4 0x009f19b0 0x0010 0xc0a8 0x00c0a88c 0x0004 0x000c 0xc036 0x080c 0x0003 0x0001 0x0004 0x0001 0x0026fd10 0x0253d9d4 0x009f19b0 0x0010 0x0253d9d4 0x 0xbeefdead 0x 0x0253d9d4 0x00a37348 0x002fa1f8 0x0004 0x00020050 0xc0a88c24 0x002705c0 0x 0x0001 0x020a2000 0x001cb798 0x00a372dc 0x 0x020a2000 0x0001 0x00a36c88 0x04a7 0x002fa3e0 0x009f1a04 0x 0x00a36c88 0x0001 0x00a36ca4 0x002fa6a0 0x009f1c0c 0x0001 0x025322d0 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 0x 01/01/2011 : 00:00:00 UTC : : 01/01/2011 : 00:00:00 UTC : :Time Set 01/01/2011 : 00:00:00 UTC : **System Startup** System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset Software Version : CANOPY 13.2 AP-DES Board Type : P12 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-47-d3-a1 No valid accounts configured. Using default user account - 2417.5 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 3 FPGA Version : 082614 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI; 01/01/2011 : 00:00:19 UTC : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port. 11/16/2014 : 05:19:45 UTC : :Time Set On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:13 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: How are you getting Power to the AP? Now that it can pass WAY more data I wonder if it's taking more power then before? I have not seen that bug.. Anyone else having that issue with 13.2? — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Ryan Ray via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Negatory. All 13.2 Official. On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:27 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Are there SM's with 13.2 beta on that AP? — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Ryan Ray via Af af@afmug.com wrote: After upgrading this AP it's also resetting like crazy by itself... **System Startup** System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset Software Version : CANOPY 13.2 AP-DES Board Type : P12 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-47-d3-a1 No valid accounts configured. Using default user account - 2417.5 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 3 FPGA Version : 082614 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI; 01/01/2011 : 00:00:23 UTC : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port. 11/15/2014 : 18:05:01 UTC : :Time Set 11/16/2014 : 00:04:16 UTC : :Idle task starved for 31
Re: [AFMUG] Ap resetting after upgrading to 13.2
Are there SM's with 13.2 beta on that AP? — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Ryan Ray via Af af@afmug.com wrote: After upgrading this AP it's also resetting like crazy by itself... **System Startup** System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset Software Version : CANOPY 13.2 AP-DES Board Type : P12 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-47-d3-a1 No valid accounts configured. Using default user account - 2417.5 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 3 FPGA Version : 082614 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI; 01/01/2011 : 00:00:23 UTC : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port. 11/15/2014 : 18:05:01 UTC : :Time Set 11/16/2014 : 00:04:16 UTC : :Idle task starved for 31 seconds. 11/16/2014 : 00:04:16 UTC : CPU Utilization (Cur/Max): (33%/100%) Total Time : 1977618 us TASK TASK % RT Tot TASK Tot S T A C K Task PC NAME PRI RT MAX Cyc Preempt CtxSw (Sz/Cur%/Max%)OV Status Addr - SYNC 4 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/33%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c WDOG 5 ( 0%) 16 79 0 6 (12284/ 2%/11%) Ready 0x991c08 LEDT 6 ( 0%) 71 147 0 6 (12284/ 2%/13%) Ready 0x800076c DIAG 10 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/15%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c trap 14 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/32%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c SESS 15 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/36%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c SOCK 16 ( 0%) 160 464 4 8 (12284/ 6%/29%) Suspend 0x800076c COMM 17 ( 0%) 674 674 0 1 (12284/ 2%/33%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c EAPR 18 ( 0%) 58 1110 0 20 (12284/ 3%/17%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c VLAN 20 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/12%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c APPT 22 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 9%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c ctic 23 ( 0%) 1967 9848 8 28 (12284/ 2%/17%) Ready 0x800076c Inet 24 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/24%) Suspend 0x800076c BDMT 27 ( 0%) 16 31 0 2 (12284/ 2%/12%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c BDQT 28 ( 0%) 1765 5252 0 20 (12284/ 2%/15%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c FECT 29 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c AUTH 31 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 3%/11%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c SNMP 32 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 3%/40%) Suspend 0x800076c teln 34 ( 0%) 28 111 0 4 (12284/ 6%/29%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL1 35 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL2 36 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL3 37 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL4 38 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c FTPs 39 ( 0%) 28 111 0 4 (12284/ 7%/31%) Suspend 0x800076c GPSO 42 ( 0%) 177 577 0 6 (12284/ 2%/28%) Ready 0x800076c GPSI 43 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 9%) PendSem 0x800076c NTP 44 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/33%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c NTPS 45 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 3%/11%) Suspend 0x800076c ROOT 46 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/40%) Suspend 0x800076c UPDT 48 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/16%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c HTTP 50 ( 0%) 29 114 0 4 (12284/ 7%/52%) Suspend 0x800076c PROX 51 (99%) 69800 1959100 52 52 (12284/ 7%/31%) Ready 0x800054c HTUN 52 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 7%/32%) Ready 0x800076c TFT0 53 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) PendQ 0x800076c nvrm 55 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 9%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c PING 56 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c LLDT 57 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/12%) Ready 0x800076c STAT 60 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 ( 8192/ 3%/17%) Ready 0x800076c IDLE 61 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 ( 8192/ 3%/17%) Ready 0x800054c PRI PC ID 5 0800076c 0 6 0800076c 1 51 0800054c 2 28 0800076c 3 51 0800054c 4 18 0800076c 5 23 0800076c 6 51 0800054c 7 17 0800076c 8 51 0800054c 9 28 0800076c 10 51 0800054c 11 18 0800076c 12 23 0800076c 13 51 0800054c 14 28 0800076c 15 51 0800054c 16 27 0800076c 17 51 0800054c 18 18 0800076c 19 23 0800076c 20 51 0800054c 21 28 0800076c 22 51 0800054c 23 5 0800076c 24 6 0800076c 25 51 0800054c 26 18 0800076c 27 23 0800076c 28 51 0800054c 29 28 0800076c 30 51 0800054c 31 18 0800076c 32 23 0800076c 33 16 0800076c 34 23 0800076c 35 16 0800076c 36 23 0800076c 37 34 0800076c 38 39 0800076c 39 50 0800076c 40 51 0800054c 41 28 0800076c 42 51 0800054c 43 18 0800076c 44 23 0800076c 45 51 0800054c 46 28 0800076c 47 51 0800054c 48 18 0800076c 49 23 0800076c 50 51 0800054c 51 5 0800076c 52 6 0800076c 53 51 0800054c 54 28 0800076c 55 51 0800054c 56 18 0800076c 57 23 0800076c 58 51 0800054c 59 28 0800076c 60 51 0800054c 61 18 0800076c 62 23 0800076c 63 51 0800054c 64 28 0800076c 65 51 0800054c 66 18 0800076c 67 23 0800076c 68 16 0800076c 69 23 0800076c 70 16 0800076c 71 23 0800076c 72 34 0800076c 73 39 0800076c 74 50 0800076c 75 51 0800054c 76 5 0800076c 77 6 0800076c 78 51 0800054c 79 28 0800076c 80 51 0800054c 81 18 0800076c 82 23 0800076c 83 51 0800054c 84 28 0800076c 85 51 0800054c 86 18 0800076c 87 23 0800076c 88 51 0800054c 89 28 0800076c 90 51 0800054c 91 27 0800076c 92 51 0800054c 93 18 0800076c 94 23 0800076c 95 51 0800054c 96 5 0800076c 97 6 0800076c 98 28 0800076c 99 51 0800054c 100 18 0800076c 101 23
Re: [AFMUG] Ap resetting after upgrading to 13.2
How are you getting Power to the AP? Now that it can pass WAY more data I wonder if it's taking more power then before? I have not seen that bug.. Anyone else having that issue with 13.2? — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Ryan Ray via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Negatory. All 13.2 Official. On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:27 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Are there SM's with 13.2 beta on that AP? — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Ryan Ray via Af af@afmug.com wrote: After upgrading this AP it's also resetting like crazy by itself... **System Startup** System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset Software Version : CANOPY 13.2 AP-DES Board Type : P12 Device Setting : 2.4GHz MIMO OFDM - Access Point - 0a-00-3e-47-d3-a1 No valid accounts configured. Using default user account - 2417.5 MHz - 20.0 MHz - 1/16 - CC 3 FPGA Version : 082614 FPGA Features : DES, Sched, US/ETSI; 01/01/2011 : 00:00:23 UTC : Acquired sync pulse from Power Port. 11/15/2014 : 18:05:01 UTC : :Time Set 11/16/2014 : 00:04:16 UTC : :Idle task starved for 31 seconds. 11/16/2014 : 00:04:16 UTC : CPU Utilization (Cur/Max): (33%/100%) Total Time : 1977618 us TASK TASK % RT Tot TASK Tot S T A C K Task PC NAME PRI RT MAX Cyc Preempt CtxSw (Sz/Cur%/Max%)OV Status Addr - SYNC 4 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/33%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c WDOG 5 ( 0%) 16 79 0 6 (12284/ 2%/11%) Ready 0x991c08 LEDT 6 ( 0%) 71 147 0 6 (12284/ 2%/13%) Ready 0x800076c DIAG 10 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/15%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c trap 14 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/32%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c SESS 15 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/36%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c SOCK 16 ( 0%) 160 464 4 8 (12284/ 6%/29%) Suspend 0x800076c COMM 17 ( 0%) 674 674 0 1 (12284/ 2%/33%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c EAPR 18 ( 0%) 58 1110 0 20 (12284/ 3%/17%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c VLAN 20 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/12%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c APPT 22 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 9%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c ctic 23 ( 0%) 1967 9848 8 28 (12284/ 2%/17%) Ready 0x800076c Inet 24 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/24%) Suspend 0x800076c BDMT 27 ( 0%) 16 31 0 2 (12284/ 2%/12%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c BDQT 28 ( 0%) 1765 5252 0 20 (12284/ 2%/15%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c FECT 29 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c AUTH 31 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 3%/11%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c SNMP 32 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 3%/40%) Suspend 0x800076c teln 34 ( 0%) 28 111 0 4 (12284/ 6%/29%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL1 35 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL2 36 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL3 37 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c TEL4 38 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c FTPs 39 ( 0%) 28 111 0 4 (12284/ 7%/31%) Suspend 0x800076c GPSO 42 ( 0%) 177 577 0 6 (12284/ 2%/28%) Ready 0x800076c GPSI 43 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 9%) PendSem 0x800076c NTP 44 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/33%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c NTPS 45 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 3%/11%) Suspend 0x800076c ROOT 46 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/40%) Suspend 0x800076c UPDT 48 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/16%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c HTTP 50 ( 0%) 29 114 0 4 (12284/ 7%/52%) Suspend 0x800076c PROX 51 (99%) 69800 1959100 52 52 (12284/ 7%/31%) Ready 0x800054c HTUN 52 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 7%/32%) Ready 0x800076c TFT0 53 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) PendQ 0x800076c nvrm 55 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 9%) PendEvFlgGrp 0x800076c PING 56 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/ 8%) Suspend 0x800076c LLDT 57 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 (12284/ 2%/12%) Ready 0x800076c STAT 60 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 ( 8192/ 3%/17%) Ready 0x800076c IDLE 61 ( 0%) 0 0 0 0 ( 8192/ 3%/17%) Ready 0x800054c PRI PC ID 5 0800076c 0 6 0800076c 1 51 0800054c 2 28 0800076c 3 51 0800054c 4 18 0800076c 5 23 0800076c 6 51 0800054c 7 17 0800076c 8 51 0800054c 9 28 0800076c 10 51 0800054c 11 18 0800076c 12 23 0800076c 13 51 0800054c 14 28 0800076c 15 51 0800054c 16 27 0800076c 17 51 0800054c 18 18 0800076c 19 23 0800076c 20 51 0800054c 21 28 0800076c 22 51 0800054c 23 5 0800076c 24 6 0800076c 25 51 0800054c 26 18 0800076c 27 23 0800076c 28 51 0800054c 29 28 0800076c 30 51 0800054c 31 18 0800076c 32 23 0800076c 33 16 0800076c 34 23 0800076c 35 16 0800076c 36 23 0800076c 37 34 0800076c 38 39 0800076c 39 50 0800076c 40 51 0800054c 41 28 0800076c 42 51 0800054c 43 18 0800076c 44 23 0800076c 45 51 0800054c 46 28 0800076c 47 51 0800054c 48 18 0800076c 49 23 0800076c 50 51 0800054c 51 5 0800076c 52 6 0800076c 53 51 0800054c 54 28 0800076c 55 51 0800054c 56 18 0800076c 57 23 0800076c 58 51 0800054c 59 28 0800076c 60 51 0800054c 61 18 0800076c 62 23 0800076c 63 51 0800054c 64 28 0800076c 65 51 0800054c 66 18 0800076c 67 23 0800076c 68 16 0800076c 69 23 0800076c 70 16 0800076c 71 23 0800076c 72 34 0800076c 73 39 0800076c 74 50
Re: [AFMUG] System Release 13.2 is Official
Think it was build 25 on the AP yeah it needs updated just wanted to be sure all the other installers out there knew I almost did not do the install — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af af@afmug.com wrote: What beta version is on the AP? There was an issue with early beta release and RF speedtest that was addressed in later (should have been 28 and onward) beta loads. Please get your sector all up onto 13.2 official if you are on the beta, then retry the scenario and if it still happens, please send me a CNUT capture of the SM. Regards, -Aaron From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 4:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Cc: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] System Release 13.2 is Official I think someone else already said this but 13.2 final on SM with beta on AP the SM will reboot it self when you do a cap test this is the same bug I reported on build 35 — Sent from Mailboxhttps://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote: There was a decision made when we added 2.5 center channels that on upgrade we wouldn’t automatically check the 2.5 centers unless the scan list was in a default (all checked) state. We didn’t want to add a ton of new scan options on an upgrade which increased the scanning time. When setting a unit that is on a load that supports 2.5M centers to default, then all (including 2.5 centers) should be selected. We are still investigating, but likely this has something to do with what Ryan was seeing when others weren’t seeing the same behavior. -Aaron From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 12:58 PM To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] System Release 13.2 is Official I'm trying to remember.. did the 2.4 450 have 2.5 centers from day one? I think the last time I got some new SMs in, they had either 12.0.x or 12.1.x on them and none of the 2.5 centers were checked after updating to 13.x. So maybe the safest approach from now on is to enable everything in the scan list automatically during/after update? Then tell everyone in the release notes about it. You'd be surprised at how many of us fully read the release notes now. OK, at least I do. On 11/14/2014 11:28 AM, Rajesh Vijayakumar via Af wrote: Its good to get confirmation of multiple successful upgrades with 2.4 GHz. We have not been able to recreate the problem yet. The test team is trying a number of combinations of upgrade/downgrade. --Rajesh Vijayakumar Cambium Networks On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Eric Muehleisen via Af af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote: Any changes/improvements in the Rate Adapt? On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote: As mentioned in another thread, we upgraded a bunch of PMP430 installations last night. Something that I wasn't expecting was an immediate improvement in the SNR (typical example below). This was pretty much across the board excepting installations that already had really good SNR. Thanks Cambium! image001.png bp part-15@SkylineBroadbandService On 11/13/2014 5:12 AM, Matt Mangriotis via Af wrote: It is here! We released 13.2 this morning officially. Come to our forum to discuss anything about it. http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/System-Release-13-2-Now-Avaialable/m-p/36254/thread-id/278 Download the software from the usual place on our support site: https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/pmp450/ Thanks to all of you that Beta tested this software with us, and helped to make it stronger and better than ever. Now that this is here, we’re hard at work on delivering the next round of enhancements (code name 13.3 (pretty original, huh?)) which are right around the corner. The momentum is building on the PMP 450 platform. Thanks again, Matt
Re: [AFMUG] System Release 13.2 is Official
Sweet! — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Matt Mangriotis via Af af@afmug.com wrote: It is here! We released 13.2 this morning officially. Come to our forum to discuss anything about it. http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/System-Release-13-2-Now-Avaialable/m-p/36254/thread-id/278 Download the software from the usual place on our support site: https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/pmp450/ Thanks to all of you that Beta tested this software with us, and helped to make it stronger and better than ever. Now that this is here, we’re hard at work on delivering the next round of enhancements (code name 13.3 (pretty original, huh?)) which are right around the corner. The momentum is building on the PMP 450 platform. Thanks again, Matt
Re: [AFMUG] System Release 13.2 is Official
move the tabs in more convenient spots like you did in 13.2 — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:15 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I say do a quick spin of 13.1.3 (13.1.3.1?) for FSK to fix the 2.4 None issue. Seems like the simplest solution. On 11/13/2014 4:56 PM, Matt via Af wrote: For the questions about 13.2 being for PMP100, the answer is no. And I can’t comment quite yet on any possible upcoming releases for the PMP100. The main thing that comes to mind regarding 13.1.3 on PMP100 is the lack of being able to set carrier frequency to none on a disabled AP. Otherwise what would 13.2 really bring PMP100? As recently as 6 months ago I believe we purchased new FSK 2.4 SM's though. We have MANY MANY in the field yet.
[AFMUG] Can anyone service this area?
I'm told there are a bunch of million dollor homes in this area 3771 edgewater way Louisville TN I'm also told they are willing to pay anything for good service all they can get right now is Satellite internet if not you can BH a link to a near by area let me know as there is someone wanting me to consult/Help them get somthing going in there area if there are no WISP's already in the area Thanks,
Re: [AFMUG] 13.2 Issue (Removing frequency checkboxes)
Yeah I noticed that same with 5Ghz looks like they unchecked the rarely used channels in SM with 13.2 programmer was probably thinking he was helping but lots are going to complain — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Ryan Ray via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Just did a 200 group of SM's and the upgrade has removed frequencies that were previously checked. I followed the guide and did the SM's first and AP's last. Luckily the majority of these can see another AP but what the fuck... About half of these SM's were on 13.2(34) and the other half were on 13.1.3... This is what it looks like after an update [image: Inline image 1] Pre update they were all [image: Inline image 2] URG
Re: [AFMUG] WARNING: Steamy Subject Matter
I want to see UBNT Cambium both announce that they are going to add a fiber port to their higher end radios — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Yes, Fiber. -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via Af Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WARNING: Steamy Subject Matter And Fiber Sterling? -Original Message- From: Jay Weekley via Af Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 12:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WARNING: Steamy Subject Matter MDU deployment. Wired and wireless. Jason Petrillo via Af wrote: So that is what it takes to get your attention… As has been mentioned several times in the recent past we are working on the Animal Farm 9 agenda. We could really use some input from you the participants in this process. Currently I am counting on the usual suspect to show their wares in a similar fashion to what they have done in the past. Beyond that I would ask what would you like to learn more about? Panel discussions? How to meet girls? How to pick the perfect emoticon to best capture mood and intonation? I’m open to anything and would be happy to chase down industry experts to enlighten us all. Thoughts? If you would rather not respond to the group with your suggestions please feel free to contact me at ja...@cni.net mailto:ja...@cni.net or 360.442.4414. Thanks, Jason Petrillo Last Mile Gear
[AFMUG] Cambium SM DMZ
So.. we want to DMZ the first IP from the SM's NAT so the Router is DMZ'd but when I set DMZ IP to .2 it gives a warrning conflict that it is in the DHCP Pool.. am I doing somthing wrong or is it just a security warrning? Thanks,
Re: [AFMUG] Cambium SM DMZ
Thanks seems to be working... On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote: That's the way we do it. I wish it was the default, but the software in the SM gives you a warning that you can safely ignore. bp part-15@SkylineBroadbandService On 11/11/2014 7:03 AM, timothy steele via Af wrote: So.. we want to DMZ the first IP from the SM's NAT so the Router is DMZ'd but when I set DMZ IP to .2 it gives a warrning conflict that it is in the DHCP Pool.. am I doing somthing wrong or is it just a security warrning? Thanks,
[AFMUG] PMP450/100 NAT Performance
how big of a performance hit are you guys seeing with the new 450 Beta with SM's running in NAT Mode? Also what performance hit are you seeing with PMP100 with NAT mode on? Thanks,
Re: [AFMUG] PMP450/100 NAT Performance
Thanks Sean! — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Sean Heskett via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Pmp100 doesn't have any NAT mode problem because the air interface doesn't do more than 10ish Mbps download. The 430/450s had problems around 15mbps but I think 13.2 now gets NAT download speeds of 50ish Mbps or more. On Monday, November 10, 2014, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: how big of a performance hit are you guys seeing with the new 450 Beta with SM's running in NAT Mode? Also what performance hit are you seeing with PMP100 with NAT mode on? Thanks,
Re: [AFMUG] POE Crossover baords
The cross over cable just makes it idiot proof so you know power is being flipped just by looking at it but yes you can just flip the pins on 1 side — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jay Weekley via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Power Cambium from a Microtik POE switch? Christopher Tyler via Af wrote: Switch outs. Sometimes you visit a customer and change them from Cambium to UBNT or vice-versa and they are not home so you have no access to the power supply. So with a crossover you just leave the old power supply and put up the new radio. Bench testing radios, less clutter if you have a universal power supply. I'm sure there are other uses, these are but a few that come to mind.
[AFMUG] good fiber supply source?
Found this link on a diffrent forum.. the rates really seem lower then others? http://www.comstarsupply.com/
Re: [AFMUG] AF5/24 errors
Is there a bug with microtik switches? — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:59 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Found this interesting. I have some AF24's on 2.0 and AF5's on 2.2-beta3. They work fine. If I do a Tools Discovery, the MT ethernet counters on both sides will increment FCS and Code errors. Same thing happens if I run some pings between the radios (not router to router, radio to radio). I'm guessing this because of the switching method the AF's use (cut-through?).
Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti AC
Bullet unless your talking about the smaller nanobeam — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Jason McKemie via Af af@afmug.com wrote: What is the antenna/radio second from the left in the lineup picture under the Hardware Accelerated Performance section? Right next to the Nanobeam. http://www.ubnt.com/broadband/ On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Mike Hammett via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Doesn't exist until proven otherwise. ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL -- *From: *Jason McKemie via Af af@afmug.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Saturday, November 1, 2014 12:45:16 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] Ubiquiti AC Has anyone heard of a timeline on the availability of ptmp AC in Ubiquiti's lineup? -Jason
Re: [AFMUG] 13.2(Build 35) Open Beta
There still working on 1 bug only 1 company is seeing last I heard build 35 is the most stable firmware I've seen so I'm sure official will not be too much longer but probably faster if more would test build 35 on AP's to track down this 1 bug — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Matt via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Are we going to get 13.2 official this week?
Re: [AFMUG] 13.2(Build 35) Open Beta
Arron awesome to hear.. I have not tested this on build 35 but has the issue of the SM not showing a dropped link until a link capacity test due to there was no data flowing been addressed yet? If not can we get a sight survey mode that dose a continuas link capacity test at the same time showing you real time signal so we can properly install antenna's? Thanks, — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Build 35 took care of the AP Ethernet hangup, which was the main one being worked during Wispapalooza. There will be a Build 36 put on Open Beta probably tomorrow in which we were able to fix for some of the old nagging rare and random crashes that have been seen in previous releases. Our current plan is to release next week. Regards, -Aaron From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:50 PM To: af@afmug.com Cc: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 13.2(Build 35) Open Beta There still working on 1 bug only 1 company is seeing last I heard build 35 is the most stable firmware I've seen so I'm sure official will not be too much longer but probably faster if more would test build 35 on AP's to track down this 1 bug — Sent from Mailboxhttps://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Matt via Af af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote: Are we going to get 13.2 official this week?
Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo
IBM still in tech they are working on a new hard drive that is smaller then a SSD and will never die — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Very sad. That's what happens sometimes when you turn the company over to junior. Now that IBM has sold off their hardware businesses, they aren't even a technology company any longer. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:02 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo Yeah, Motorola Mobility. Old news. Motorola changed its name to Motorola Solutions while selling off pieces. On 10/30/2014 1:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: http://news.lenovo.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=1860 � Rory Conaway Triad Wireless 4226 S. 37th Street Phoenix, Az.� 85040 602-426-0542 r...@triadwireless.net www.triadwireless.net �
Re: [AFMUG] Punch down
We need fiber on AP not a punch down — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Punch downs are only good for a relatively limited number of cycles (way less than an RJ45). So punch downs are good when you expect the connection to be good for the duration (like usually years). If you expect to make/break the connection a few times, you would not use a punch down. bp On 10/30/2014 2:26 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: Wear and tear? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:18:55 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Punch down F that. Wear and tear on CPEs. We don't use them, but many swear they will only let their installers use EZ-RJ45. If that's the case, I wouldn't want those people punching down radios. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 10/30/2014 01:11 PM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: What do you guys think of punching down on radios, PoE, etc.? I saw a radio at WISPAPALOOZA that had you punch down the wires onto the radio's circuit board. Seems like it would cut down on any issues of the RJ45 coming undone. What pitfalls would there be? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo
Nope YouTube it really cool stuff — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote: If you are talking about that stamp thing from several years ago, I thought it was dead. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Cc: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo IBM still in tech they are working on a new hard drive that is smaller then a SSD and will never die — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Very sad. That’s what happens sometimes when you turn the company over to junior. Now that IBM has sold off their hardware businesses, they aren’t even a technology company any longer. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:02 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo Yeah, Motorola Mobility. Old news. Motorola changed its name to Motorola Solutions while selling off pieces. On 10/30/2014 1:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: http://news.lenovo.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=1860 � Rory Conaway Triad Wireless 4226 S. 37th Street Phoenix, Az.� 85040 602-426-0542 r...@triadwireless.net www.triadwireless.net �
Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo
http://www.engadget.com/2014/09/04/ibm-wants-to-kill-the-hard-drive/ IBM wants to kill the hard drive it invented — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote: They have been working on that for 10 years. I think fusion will get here faster. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:59 PM To: af@afmug.com Cc: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo Nope YouTube it really cool stuff — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote: If you are talking about that stamp thing from several years ago, I thought it was dead. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Cc: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo IBM still in tech they are working on a new hard drive that is smaller then a SSD and will never die — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Rory Conaway via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Very sad. That’s what happens sometimes when you turn the company over to junior. Now that IBM has sold off their hardware businesses, they aren’t even a technology company any longer. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:02 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Motorola just sold to Lenovo Yeah, Motorola Mobility. Old news. Motorola changed its name to Motorola Solutions while selling off pieces. On 10/30/2014 1:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: http://news.lenovo.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=1860 � Rory Conaway Triad Wireless 4226 S. 37th Street Phoenix, Az.� 85040 602-426-0542 r...@triadwireless.net www.triadwireless.net �
Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 Focus ring? Attachment method?
Yes 450 only — Sent from Mailbox On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:45 AM, TJ Trout via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Is the focus ring a 450 only product? Epmp? On Oct 28, 2014 7:50 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote: The old ones (with the screw in the back) needed some double-stick tape to hold them in place. We found they wanted to twist or ride up like cheap undershorts. The new ones (without the screw) seem to fit pretty snuggly. We still put some double stick (outdoor flavor) under the tab at the top. The ones we've re-visited seem to be staying on. bp On 10/28/2014 3:35 PM, Peter Kranz via Af wrote: Are you supposed to add some kind of adhesive to keep the focus ring from blowing off? *-Peter*
Re: [AFMUG] Idea's wanted for findmehighspeed
Done.. whats next? On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dennis Burgess via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Tim, Shoot me a e-mail and I can get you the logo etc for towercoverage.com. J Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net -- *From: *timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com *Sender: *Af af-boun...@afmug.com *Date: *Tue, 28 Oct 2014 01:50:47 + *To: *af@afmug.comaf@afmug.com *ReplyTo: *af@afmug.com *Subject: *[AFMUG] Idea's wanted for findmehighspeed Findmehighspeed.com was getting a lot of hits for new sign-ups when it first started now it has slowed down I'm up for your idea's I would like to keep the service free connect users to as many WISP's in there area as possible 1 idea would be to have the contact form send a email direct to this list that is up to paul if he wants that.. What Direction would you like findmehighspeed.com to take? let me know.. Thanks,
Re: [AFMUG] Field Paperwork
going Digital is note that hard now days all you have to do is get youre Techs Galaxy Note Phones with a PDF Editor app have them Sign the PDF have tech email a copy to billing.. then billing can e-mail copy to customer or mail with next bill.. not sure what about that needs a plan.. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chuck Hogg via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Adobe is roughly $15/user/mth Regards, Chuck On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Keefe John via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Or check out open esignforms for free :) http://open.esignforms.com/ On 10/29/2014 2:17 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote: I wonder how much the e-signing companies charge per document? VoIP Innovations and Lease Corp both use e-signing services and I like it. Makes it seem very professional, even though basically you are just clicking to sign. It’s nice to be able to use the link and go back later and see what you signed. Kind of like Dropbox for contracts. *From:* Ben Royer via Af af@afmug.com *Sent:* Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:51 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Field Paperwork Excellent feedback from everyone, I greatly appreciate it. The concept of the quick PDF is nice, as well as the Google Drive folders. Our agreement is only a couple pages, the install work order is a couple pages as well, but nothing to consuming for someone to read through and then have an email of it. Thanks again for the feedback. Thank you, Ben Royer, Operations Supervisor Royell Communications, Inc. 217-965-3699 www.royell.net *From:* That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com *Sent:* Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:41 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Field Paperwork we normally get ours signed ahead of time We used to have a customer sign off form, but when they did get filled out they rarely made it back to the shop We are looking at options through powercode to get customer signatures, even if its just a tablet upload as a file. I dont know why people are so against getting their contracts signed ahead of time as part of the sign up for service, just have part of the terms void the contract if its an unsuccessful installation. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I remember an ATT U-Verse installer finishing the job and then wanting me to sign a 7 page agreement on his iPad. He stood there killing time for 154 minutes while I read the agreement. Apparently they count on people not reading what they sign. Also it seems like the time to get it signed was BEFORE he did the work. So my recommendation is to either keep your agreement to 1 page, or provide a copy to the customer ahead of time, or to read while the installer is working (this also gives the customer something to do other than nitpicking your install work). It's a waste of time to have your installer stand there while the customer reads a long agreement. -Original Message- From: Jason Pond via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12:15 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Field Paperwork So the going paperless is way easier than you think. Buy a signature pad like a Topaz Sig Lite (usb) send with installer. Your contract is probably already in PDF form. Create Information boxes and add a signature field. This can be done with Acrobat reader I think. They save on the computer have installer download or e-mail them in at the end of the day. The installer can even e-mail a copy to the customer right there while they are still onsite. (two things good about that. You know you have the right e-mail address and the installer knows that the internet is working). If the customer wants a signed copy they can have one e-mailed to them at the end of the day after the installer gets back to the office. No matter what you do an in-vehicle printer will be problematic forever they were not designed for that environment. (cheaper in the long run to go paperless sooner than later)... Sincerely, Jason Pond On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Ben Royer via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Quick poll question... For those of you still using paper in the field for your technicians to have customers sign, do you use printers in the vehicles? If yes to that question, which printer do you recommend? We use a basic HP Deskjet scanner/copier/printer, so the client can sign the paperwork and then we can make a copy for them in the field. However, they are not very durable to the every day use of our field techs. I’ve even had them brought in because they are jammed and we find things like a mustard packet inside them. Now, the obvious go paperless argument is null at this point as we are putting a plan in place to get there someday, but until then, what would you all recommend for paperwork printing in the field? Thank you, Ben Royer, Operations Supervisor Royell Communications, Inc. 217-965-3699 www.royell.net -- All parts
Re: [AFMUG] Experience with Sandvine and or other DPI network appliances
Powercode/procera prob best optionNETEQ is a little more simple but dose a lot less Pfsense with Ntop would be a free option but 99% more manual labor involved — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Stu Thom via Af af@afmug.com wrote: We are a 1500 customer WISP that has been using Sandvine for the past year for DPI and traffic prioritization. This has allowed us to change to a different business model selling services instead of Mbps. These are our residential tiers: http://www.webformix.com/residential-services/ This is our fairshare policy: http://www.webformix.com/fairshare-policy/ While is a bit of a vague post, any thoughts? Is anyone else running DPI boxes? I have seen the name Procera come up on the list and we did speak with them a bit when looking around at this project. Migrating customers from Mbps to our new tiers has been a long road, but we have had very positive results internally and from our customers. A very small handful of cancellations. 2-3 maybe?
Re: [AFMUG] 450 bh trick?
Try the 13.2 firmware? Spectrum scan looking good? — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Craig House via Af af@afmug.com wrote: No they were 230s on there before and I did try to re-aim them both up and down and side to side signal was a -59 in backhaul master evalbut it kept saying BER rate and told it to rescan Sent from my iPhone On Oct 21, 2014, at 11:43, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Dishes has 100 replaced with 450 and no re aim? Point dish up a few degrees on each end — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Craig House via Af af@afmug.com wrote: We have put up our first pair of backhaul 450 radios today 5.5 mile wink signal before was a -51 on both ends dishes did not get repointed just replace the radios The radio see each other at a -59 signal but they will not connect up says that the BER is too high This is from a water tower to a 600 foot communications tower that is easy line of sight from 40 feet lower on each end Is there a special trick to making these radios connect? Sent from my iPhone
Re: [AFMUG] UBNT airview won't run
I have not seen that issue but I use Firefox for UBNT stuff.. There where bug fixes for that in 5.6 beta5 I think you might try that — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Craig Baird via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Is Airview giving anyone else Java related grief? I've got 5.5.10 on the radio, and when trying to run Airview, it pops an Unable to launch error. I've googled for solutions, and so far nothing pans out. Using the latest Java 8. In the past, it appears that the solution to this problem was to drop Java security to medium. Oracle appears to have removed that option in recent versions. Now you can only select High or Very High. However, you're supposed to be able to accomplish the same thing by putting the URL into the exception list. I've done that, but to no avail. I've also tried it on a PC running Java 7 with the same results. Does anyone have a solution to this? Craig
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas
A POE powered fiber to POE media converter that gets its power and sync from a sync injector and has a weather proof enclosure There you go Forrest A product that you need at least 2 at every tower — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:22 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: A microtik cloud router with sync injector POE ports — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) via Af af@afmug.com wrote: A 12 - 24 port switch that you can sync whatever or POE whatever, software configurable. I would expect it to be expensive… From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2014 1:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas Even a 12+4 would be great From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Cc: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas A sync injecter with 28 ports 24 sync injected ports + 4 POE ports for BH's that would keep things much cleaner at tower sites — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Mathew Howard via Af af@afmug.com wrote: +1 to that. From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh Reynolds via Af [af@afmug.com] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 7:59 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas You know what I really need more than anything else? I need a DC-terminal POE pass-through for 8-16 devices, where I can toggle between UBNT 24v passive poe, 48-56v, and maybe 56V 1A per-port. Maybe two models, an 8 device and a 16 device model (16/32 ports). Also will want a rack-mount version with 24 devices (48 ports), so make that maybe 3 models. This way I can use whatever switch I want, yet still have full control over each device. It should be able to send syslog messages/traps, and that's pretty much it. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/05/2014 12:19 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af wrote: It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages out to the list. With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is time for me to decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux. We've got several products at various stages of completion, but almost all of them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of products we complete just because they help fill out our product offering instead of expecting a lot of revenue from them. A couple of these have appeared on the website recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the voltmeter/shunt input modules. So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products PacketFlux could build which would help you in your WISP. I'm particularly looking for products which if they existed would go at every one of your tower sites, or even better at every customer location. I know these product ideas exist out there, and I'd love to hear them. Feel free to throw ideas out which are outside of the narrow niche that you think of PacketFlux fitting into. One final note - there is always a query for an all-in-one tower device which includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc conversion, battery charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power injection, fiber conversion, etc.. I've heard those loud and clear and am aware of that desire. There's work being done in-house toward something like that, but there are many hurdles left to make it a reality. If there's a simplified version of this which would fit a specific, widespread, need I'd love to hear about it, but the idea of a device you put into your rack and it handles everything needed at a tower site is still quite a ways off for us. So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a couple and run with them. -forrest
[AFMUG] wireless installer app
anyone using the wireless installer app by deliberant? I can't get it to import my KMZ https://www.deliberant.com/installer-app
[AFMUG] Custom fiber cable?
I'm sure you have all seen the coax cable exeed uses with the extra copper on outside of jacked for power.. Dose anyone one know is it's possible to order fiber with 2 copper wires on out side of jacket in its own jacket? — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] DFS issues
If your not near a radar do 4ft vertical separation on 5.2's make sure they are not seeing anything UBNT running in 5,2 — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Craig House via Af af@afmug.com wrote: We are starting to see a lot more DFS detections on 5.2 AP's. We never used to have this problem. Recent upgrades to firmware seem to be making this a more sensitive detection. I have one tower tonight with 6 new FSK sectors that are on abcabc layout. The sectors in this layout have radar detection on this tower at various times in the last 20 minutes on both sector c radios and on the second sector B. I am also seeing this happen on towers where we have recently replaced connectorized AP's due to lightining damage where it was not a problem before. we are running 13.1.3 on all of these radios. What are my options here. I cant just stop using 5.2 for APs??? Craig
Re: [AFMUG] Custom fiber cable?
Here is a link to the coax cable with power wires I'm taking about that I want done on fiber — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:02 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I'm sure you have all seen the coax cable exeed uses with the extra copper on outside of jacked for power.. Dose anyone one know is it's possible to order fiber with 2 copper wires on out side of jacket in its own jacket? — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] Custom fiber cable?
Forgot to attach link.. http://m.grainger.com/mobile/product/CAROL-Coaxial-And-Power-Cable-1ATG8 — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:02 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I'm sure you have all seen the coax cable exeed uses with the extra copper on outside of jacked for power.. Dose anyone one know is it's possible to order fiber with 2 copper wires on out side of jacket in its own jacket? — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] Custom fiber cable?
Everything is pricy to begin with but after the demand is there price will go down just think of all the ways it would change the wisp industry No longer having to deal with cable interference on towers You can now link 450 radios 1000ft from farm house where you have line of sight It will allow manufactors to use fiber on AP's instead of Ethernet and get its power from the power wires It fixes soo many issues I really think this is a cable that needs to be made — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jason McKemie via Af af@afmug.com wrote: It's certainly possible, you just might not like the price. On Saturday, October 18, 2014, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I'm sure you have all seen the coax cable exeed uses with the extra copper on outside of jacked for power.. Dose anyone one know is it's possible to order fiber with 2 copper wires on out side of jacket in its own jacket? — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] Custom fiber cable?
Got a fusion splicer so that would work way more pricey then I expected though — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Chuck Hogg via Af af@afmug.com wrote: So I found out through my Commscope friend that only supplies ATT (lush job), he told me that they are all custom built to order, the price is typically about $5-8/ft depending on size of the copper wire or depending on the amount of fiber. He told me that they don't usually sell it the way we would want it, unterminated, a big roll, etc. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Jason McKemie via Af af@afmug.com wrote: It's going to have to happen the other way around, radio manufacturers are going to have to start making APs with SFP cages and then you might start seeing lower cost options when it comes to hybrid cable. On Saturday, October 18, 2014, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Everything is pricy to begin with but after the demand is there price will go down just think of all the ways it would change the wisp industry No longer having to deal with cable interference on towers You can now link 450 radios 1000ft from farm house where you have line of sight It will allow manufactors to use fiber on AP's instead of Ethernet and get its power from the power wires It fixes soo many issues I really think this is a cable that needs to be made — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jason McKemie via Af af@afmug.com wrote: It's certainly possible, you just might not like the price. On Saturday, October 18, 2014, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I'm sure you have all seen the coax cable exeed uses with the extra copper on outside of jacked for power.. Dose anyone one know is it's possible to order fiber with 2 copper wires on out side of jacket in its own jacket? — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox
[AFMUG] Google trying to open new frequency
Google working with FCC to open new unused frequency for wifi link below.. http://www.engadget.com/2014/10/16/google-wireless-testing-application/ Google's plan for super-fast internet: tap unused airwaves — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] ubnt air select
5.5.10 opens the 5.1 band you might not need to hop if you upgrade firmware On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com wrote: s/SINCGARS ugh, no more emails for me today... throwing in the towel :/ Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/14/2014 07:44 AM, Josh Reynolds via Af wrote: It's not like a SCINGARS hop/10ms or anything. You can try pushing it till around 15/1500, but the biggest problem is that clients who drop association for whatever reason will have problems reconnecting if given only a short window to authenticate and sync. I hop I was fairly clear in what I just said. It's early Vegas time and there were a lot of open bars and drinks exchanged last night... Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/14/2014 07:40 AM, Josh Reynolds via Af wrote: You've got your hop time and hello count. Hello needs to be roughly 1/100th of your hop count, but anything shorter than 30/3000 will often have issues. Yes, the radio will hop every period, ideally to the channels that aren't on the naughty list. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 10/14/2014 07:36 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote: 5.5.8 Im leery of a week old UBNT load. I put it on one backhaul and had an issue with it getting power from a toughswitch, but havent had a chance to see if it is one off or can be replicated. I dont care if I can define the hops or not, it shouldnt be hopping every single hopping period as far as I know, if theyre trying to mimic FHSS then the hopping sequence needs to be randomized and much much quicker On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:19 AM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Are you using 5.5.10? The frequency hope supposed to be user defined — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:53 PM, That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com wrote: . i tried this a long time ago, it just hopped constantly so i figured after a couple years they must have gotten it to work, so I turned it on on a 5ghz backhaul and selected the default list. Its hopping like once every second, does it go through a series of hops before it stabilizes or is it still UBNT unicorn sausage? -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] Remote WiFi Management Solution
What brand are your SM's? If ubnt Airgateway — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Christopher Hair via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Anyone out there offering a WiFi service with management to their subscriber base? In the past we have just sold our subscribers a WiFi router only to end up providing free support for it later down the road. So as a test we started to offer a monthly WiFi service to see how it would be accepted and to our surprise the majority of our new subscribers are opting for the monthly service versus purchasing the router out right. So now we are looking for a solution to easily provision and manage subscriber WiFi routers remotely. I had heard that ReadyNet offers such a product but have been unsuccessful in contacting their sales staff. Any suggestions or lessons learned that anyone could share would be greatly appreciated. . NTI Christopher Hair NTInet Inc. 2033 St. Matthews Road Orangeburg, SC 29118 V: 803.533-1660 Ext: 203 M: 803.937.4953 Web: http://www.ntinet.com/ www.ntinet.com Email: mailto:%20ch...@ntinet.com ch...@ntinet.com
Re: [AFMUG] 13.2 (Build34) Beta Software is Now Available!
Can you define heavy IP environment? Dose that only apply to routed mode or also IP's flowing over a bridge? — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Mandziara via Af af@afmug.com wrote: AF Users, 13.2 (Build 34) is now available. https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/beta Please download it and let us know what you think. We expect this to be the LAST Open Beta version of 13.2. We are wrapping up this release and have a general question to the Open Beta Users. For all the users that are using 13.2 (Build 30) and newer, please let me know how many of these APs are in heavy IP traffic environments. Best, Cambium Jonathan
Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!
If you turn Airmax off on your UBNT AP's you can slowly swap all CPE's to Epmp then change AP to Epmp that is what wifi mode is for — Sent from Mailbox On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote: What is the perceived application for the SM operating in standard WiFi mode ? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chaturvedi via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 7:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available! Folks, ePMP Beta software 2.3-RC10 is now available for download here: https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp System Release 2.3 adds the following features: * 5 MHz and 10 MHz channel bandwidth support o Max number of subscribers is limited to 30 for 5MHz and 60 for 10 MHz * SM Wi-Fi mode support (Only 20 MHz and 40 MHz channel bandwidths) o SM can operate in standard Wi-Fi mode * Broadcast Traffic Shaping (Limiting) o Ability to limit the number of broadcast packets per second * Multicast VLAN and Prioritization o Multicast VLAN support with prioritization o Ability to leave/join multicast groups and limit number of multicast groups to up to 5 groups o Support for IGMPv3 snooping * CLI access via ssh (default credentials: admin/admin) * Option to set SM Max Tx power manually Please post any feedback on the ePMP Beta Forum! http://epmpbeta.community.cambiumnetworks.com/ Thanks, Sriram
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas
I was talking about powering 1 CPE and 1 AP with 1 POE for micro pops — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af af@afmug.com wrote: 150W is pretty hard to deliver via CAT5. Each wire is rated at .577 amps. Ignoring other concerns, this means at 48V, you get about 25 watts with a bit of margin, per wire. If you are sending the power up on two pairs, and returning it on the other two, this means you only have about 100W total you can do via CAT5 (110W with no margin).To do over 100W you have to use something else for the return path, say the tower or a ground wire - in which case you could send 200W up a CAT5 cable and return it via ground. Personally once you get that much power in a CAT5 cable it scares me. A LOT of voltage drop, challenges in injection methods, etc Most ethernet magnetics top out at about 25.5W for power on two pairs, and 51W for four. This also corresponds to the 802.3at spec. I guess if you're returning on ground, you can also get 102W. Right now I'm focusing on the 50W category (ok, maybe a smidgen more). -forrest On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Exalt ExtremeAir Radios draw 135watt average over PoE. Telrad Radios we use draw up to 150watt but usually around 120ish. Matthew Jenkins SmarterBroadband m...@sbbinc.net 530.272.4000 On 10/05/2014 04:55 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote: What radio needs 150w? Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr From: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.com mailto: af@afmug.com Reply-To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.com mailto: af@afmug.com Date: Sunday, October 5, 2014 at 7:14 PM To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.com mailto: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas This is actually in the category of what I'm expending a fair bit of RD on right now. The challenge comes cost. 150watt per port is very expensive to do when factoring in the DC-DC conversion. 20W is easy. 50W is a bit harder. 150W gets very expensive quickly. As a result, I'm thinking somewhat modular, i.e. pick/choose. I also have to be mindful of the competitors in the space, in that I want to be different in the right ways. The power injection/switching space is quite crowded. -forrest On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Matt Jenkins via Af af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote: Our infrastructure sites look like this: Shielded Cables - 8 or 24port shielded patch panel - APC PRM24 with WB Surge Modules - PoE Injectors - Switch / Router PoE Injectors are attached to a Masterswitch. pipe dream I know this probably is not feasible but What I would REALLY like is an active PoE midspan injector (8/24 gigabit port). Something that does not require a site monitor (has web/snmp function built in). It takes AC power and can output DC to each type of device. This device would be software configurable for power type and has apc masterswitch functionality. It would need to support up to 150watt per port for WiMAX and Licensed Link Radios. It would need to support from 12vdc to 56vdc output. If there was a model that also supported power out to a few (4) AC outlets I wouldn't even need an APC Masterswitch. The goal is to replace all those PoE injectors which don't mount in a rack or on a din rail in a box. /pipe dream Matthew Jenkins SmarterBroadband m...@sbbinc.net mailto:m...@sbbinc.net 530.272.4000 tel:530.272.4000 On 10/05/2014 01:19 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af wrote: It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages out to the list. With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is time for me to decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux. We've got several products at various stages of completion, but almost all of them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of products we complete just because they help fill out our product offering instead of expecting a lot of revenue from them. A couple of these have appeared on the website recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the voltmeter/shunt input modules. So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products PacketFlux could build which would help you in your WISP. I'm particularly looking for products which if they existed would go at every one of your tower sites, or even better at every customer location. I know these product ideas exist out there, and I'd love to hear them. Feel free to throw ideas out which are outside of the narrow niche that you think of PacketFlux fitting
Re: [AFMUG] How frequently have you had a price increase?
768k for video stream? I thought that would only do the lowest quality Netflix and that's talking 5 years ago — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:32 PM, David Milholen via Af af@afmug.com wrote: We had no choice after deploying the 450 and offering up a handful of capacity for a competitive rate which basically put us at capacity in less than 6 months with out the numbers we wanted to see. So, since we had not raised rates in 10yrs we had no choice but to regroup and look at how we compare to our local cable. Really we have the upper hand because of what we do as a wireless industry. The whole hybrid solution is the key. Basically WIsps offer fiber to the home via fixed connections from a fiber carrier. Cable isnt even close due to the party line affect. Cambium gives us a scheduler that enables a VC per sub so we can imitate carrier class connections for a much lower price than what a carrier would serve while still making money doing it. So we can market a wonderful new buzz word called hybrid until it dies we will roll with it but so far the response has been very positive for the new price plans we now offer. Our 5x5 plan is a 5Mbs/5Mbs Down/Up for $75.00 monthly. We limit our basic which is 3x1 @ $50.00 to only one video stream @ 768k per one device per account. On 10/4/2014 7:27 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: i rarely have good to say about the way my boss runs things, but he is a magician at the rate plan changes. we have never directly raise prices, for the most part we have always either kept them the same price or lowered the cost to stay where you are at. usually any rate plan changes come with the option to get more for less, knowing full well that they ultimately will move up a tier in the future because they want more. since we quit directly selling the speed and moved to consumption based pricing it gives a lot more leverage to make global changes with a limited demand increase on the infrastructure. It costs us alot less to offer more consumption than to offer more speed, and everything is moving to consumption based anyway, whether you like it or not. our absolute lowest tier is marketed as an email only plan with a 5gb cap to throttled speed. but we actually moved it to 10gb because there were too many hitting 6gb that would have needed to move up a tier just to get an extra gb, easier to raise it for free, and we still get about a 50% take rate to the next tier anyway. things like that are how we are able to raise prices without actually raising prices. Because of it, even though we went through a negative customer growth (i like that buzz word) our profits increased, and now that we are on a positive customer growth trend, that profit increases quickly which is why we just dropped over 100k buying up the available 320 market at the time (yeah, we were one of the ones that helped cause that). I wish I could provide the specific details of the two major rate changes in the last five years, because they were both pretty ingenious, ultimately getting customers to thank you for raising their prices, just by giving them ownership of the decision. On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, David Milholen via Af af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote: This is what we have done.. On 10/4/2014 4:02 PM, Jon Langeler via Af wrote: Yeah I wouldn't raise prices on a 900SM customer. Get ready to overhaul the network with faster options before charging more. But definitely charge more as opposed to going cheaper. Markets may vary... Jon On Oct 4, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote: Very good input from all of you! *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof via Af *Sent:* Saturday, October 04, 2014 4:32 PM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] How frequently have you had a price increase? Everyone seems to expect our prices will go down, it’s the Internet after all, everything is supposed to get cheaper until it’s free, right? We haven’t raised prices in 10 years, and we are feeling some pressure to lower prices about 10%, I guess that’s from competition though and it sounds like you don’t have too much of that problem. JAB has people here expecting $40/$50/$60 for 5M/10M/15M speed. They do have an equipment fee and a support plan in the fine print though. One school of thought is you gotta have added fees, otherwise you just look more expensive in a comparison. (And people do compare prices, even if the other guys can’t get them service.) Another school of thought is, if you do a price increase, make it big enough you don’t have another one in a year. Although that never seems to stop the cable companies. Another school of thought is to make it look like
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas
Somthing easy to make that gets asked for on the list I noticed would be a POE Y cable that would allow you to put 2 radios on a customers house/tower with only 1 cable going into the house — Sent from Mailbox On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote: How about an all-in-one tower device which includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc conversion, battery charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power injection with fiber conversion. Seriously, I would think that if you adopted some of features RMS has that you do not have it could help. Perhaps a watchdog feature the cycles the power to the AP if it cannot ping google for 15 minutes. I dunno, just brainstorming a bit. I personally always want more telemetry, more voltage inputs. More isolation on the voltage inputs. Solar charge controller built into some of your other stuff? Competitor jammer. Pan tilt rifle remote. Active denial transmitter. AP seeking missile launcher. From: Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 2:19 PM To: af Subject: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages out to the list. With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is time for me to decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux. We've got several products at various stages of completion, but almost all of them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of products we complete just because they help fill out our product offering instead of expecting a lot of revenue from them. A couple of these have appeared on the website recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the voltmeter/shunt input modules. So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products PacketFlux could build which would help you in your WISP. I'm particularly looking for products which if they existed would go at every one of your tower sites, or even better at every customer location. I know these product ideas exist out there, and I'd love to hear them. Feel free to throw ideas out which are outside of the narrow niche that you think of PacketFlux fitting into. One final note - there is always a query for an all-in-one tower device which includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc conversion, battery charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power injection, fiber conversion, etc.. I've heard those loud and clear and am aware of that desire. There's work being done in-house toward something like that, but there are many hurdles left to make it a reality. If there's a simplified version of this which would fit a specific, widespread, need I'd love to hear about it, but the idea of a device you put into your rack and it handles everything needed at a tower site is still quite a ways off for us. So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a couple and run with them. -forrest
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux Product Ideas
No switching needed DIY would be to use 3 wire scotch locks on all wires at the top then you would have 2 ends at top and 1 end at bottom as I'm typing this I'm realizing the issues doing it that way but you can figure it out I'm sure.. — Sent from Mailbox On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Mark Radabaugh via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I'm still looking for a rugged portable rechargeable power supply with a built in speaker and wifi AP for the installers to use to power and aim CPE. We cobble stuff up with rechargeable flashlights and electrical tape. It's not pretty. I would buy multiple units if the price is $200. Mark Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af af@afmug.com wrote: It's been (quite) a while since I sent one of these messages out to the list. With the release of all of our new gigabit injectors, it is time for me to decide which products will be next out the door at PacketFlux. We've got several products at various stages of completion, but almost all of them I expect to be very low volume projects - the type of products we complete just because they help fill out our product offering instead of expecting a lot of revenue from them. A couple of these have appeared on the website recently - I.E. a 2 Relay, 3 Switch module, and the voltmeter/shunt input modules. So, what I'd love to hear is some suggestions for products PacketFlux could build which would help you in your WISP. I'm particularly looking for products which if they existed would go at every one of your tower sites, or even better at every customer location. I know these product ideas exist out there, and I'd love to hear them. Feel free to throw ideas out which are outside of the narrow niche that you think of PacketFlux fitting into. One final note - there is always a query for an all-in-one tower device which includes some mixture of ac power supply, dc-dc conversion, battery charging/management, Ethernet switch, router, power injection, fiber conversion, etc.. I've heard those loud and clear and am aware of that desire. There's work being done in-house toward something like that, but there are many hurdles left to make it a reality. If there's a simplified version of this which would fit a specific, widespread, need I'd love to hear about it, but the idea of a device you put into your rack and it handles everything needed at a tower site is still quite a ways off for us. So, throw your best ideas out there... I'd love to take a couple and run with them. -forrest
[AFMUG] Munin
Guys on the UBNT forums have made a plugin for munin to monitor UBNT devices have any of you used munin? http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airOS-Software-Configuration/Now-with-SSH-support-AirOS-plugin-for-Munin-monitoring/td-p/469169 — Sent from Mailbox
Re: [AFMUG] New PMP beta load 13.2 Build 30 available!
? There is A beta out that has that? I'm confused now— Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:48 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Build 30 has that. On 9/30/2014 3:23 PM, Adam Moffett via Af wrote: An upcoming release is supposed to have a pre-populated list of channels, but you'll still be able to add the custom frequencies if you need/want to. I don't recall which version is supposed to have that. Why do we have to enter custom frequencies for 365? Also 365 SM's seem to get stuck when doing a site survey it will link at -75 then don't matter if you put the SM on ground signal won't update until you do a capacity test Been liking the Mimo-A drop down support but it has a bug in it where it will try and achieve higher modulation and then drop so there is still more to do on your algorithm for that but have a very good start — Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:11 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote: You broke my GPS stats. The 450AP I updated does not read the Motorola binary GPS data from the attached SyncPipe anymore. And there are other bugs, maybe just GUI/display issues though. I sent the info to Aaron, go beat him up for me. The GPS data issue needs to be fixed before I can update any more sectors. Other than that, I'm impressed with the RF performance w/ MIMO-A. It seems to have really helped with all the multipath/fading/ducting and sessions dropping we've been seeing at night. And throughput got a lot better in most cases. On 9/30/2014 1:49 PM, Jonathan Mandziara via Af wrote: Folks, � Does anyone have any 13.2 Beta feedback that they would like to share with the list? � Best, � Jonathan � *From:*Af [mailto:af-bounces+jonathan.mandziara=cambiumnetworks@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Mandziara via Af *Sent:* Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:32 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New PMP beta load 13.2 Build 30 available! � Folks, � PMP Beta 13.2 Build 30 is also there for PMP430 and PTP230 devices.� Please download it and let us know what you think. � Best, � Jonathan � *From:*Af [mailto:af-bounces+jonathan.mandziara=cambiumnetworks@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *canopy01 via Af *Sent:* Monday, September 22, 2014 11:38 AM *To:* Cambium Dist_List (af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com) *Subject:* [AFMUG] New PMP beta load 13.2 Build 30 available! � Folks, � PMP Beta load 13.2 Build 30 is now available for download and you can find it here: � https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/pmp450 � * Improvements for MIMO-A o PMP450 APs SMs will now default to MIMO-A control message mode o If you have an interop sector (containing 430 SMs), you may need to set this back to legacy SISO mode + Configuration - Radio - PMP 430 Interop Mode, set to SISO + This is only necessary if you have issues with existing PMP430�s reconnecting and should not be necessary in a majority of the cases. * Fix for missing None frequency option * Control Slots is now called Contention Slots * Addition of Color Code Priority column to the Session Status - Session tab o If Color Code Rescan option is enabled on the AP, and an SM is registered via a non-primary color code, there will be a countdown for each SM that will be rescanning due to this configuration. o If an SM is registered via Installation Color Code (ICC), this will also be noted on the Session Status - Device tab, Session column, next to In Session * Added number of VCs in use next to Subscriber Count on the AP's main page. �This number includes Broadcast and Multicast (if enabled) VCs. * Added support to NAT to handle fragments (to fix the FemtoCell issue) * Alignment tone fix * Various bug fixes � � Corey � �
Re: [AFMUG] PMP450
Up tilt on SM side?— Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Steve Warden via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Never looked… I shall try again! Regards Steve Warden Andrews Wireless 671 Durham road 21 Uxbridge L9P 1R4 905 852 8896 www.andrewswireless.net From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen via Af Sent: September-30-14 9:22 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 During a linktest, does the rate-adapt change from 1x? On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Steve Warden via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Hi Guys, Just wondering if anybody has any suggestions with something I am seeing on PMP5.4, I have two customers close to each other both have signals of 67db (AP SM) both have great link tests but one is showing 8x8x and the other 8x1x, I have tried repointing the AP changing the tilt etc… no difference. Both are line of sight no trees in the way, we even moved the SM on 8x1x to the other side of the house and no change – even tried another SM. This is a replacement for an FSK5.4 and the signals were identical, just this 8x8x is perplexing me. Thanks Steve Warden Andrews Wireless 671 Durham road 21 Uxbridge L9P 1R4 905 852 8896 tel:905%20852%208896 www.andrewswireless.net
Re: [AFMUG] Props to powercode
6plus not a phone that's a tablet— Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Kurt Fankhauser via Af af@afmug.com wrote: the old version looks great on an iphone 6+ Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 http://www.wavelinc.com tel. 419-562-6405 fax. 419-617-0110 On Sep 25, 2014, at 5:09 PM, timothy steele via Af af@afmug.com wrote: The new version have a smart phone friendly web site or app for installer schedules? — Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote: You change your meds or something Steve? First the props to the PTP650, now this. Makes me think that someone has you tied up in a closet or something, and is posting in your place bp On 9/25/2014 10:44 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote: I never have much good to say about anything, but this is a credit where credit is due thing. They have done alot of work on this new version they have out. We are in the process of demoing it and just did a live import of data from our old version The features in this are slick, the interface doesnt look like something from 1982 anymore It seems responsive and intuitive The big thing today was the 477 export. I personally did not want to have to learn any of the back end stuff on prepping the 477 to file for something that doesnt benefit us and is only done twice a year. I allocated until the filing deadline all my time to focusing on actually reading the FCC crap, collecting the data, formatting it, etc. Powercode just released their functional tool, so i set aside two of those days to get a build live and import our data, I had a couple issues, but it was mainly my dumb ass causing them. Got the live data running, ran the tool and uploaded our stuff. The whole process took around ten minutes, and I still dont even know or care exactly what the FCC is getting, all I know is its done, assuming its correct, and I didnt have to stab anybody. If you are looking for a platform that does your goodness for you (this issue comes up about once a month) Powercode has become a top notch product. Managing your guys time is one of the features just implemented, it needs a little fine tuning, but you can have utter morons handling your scheduling and the system makes sure things dont get too out of hand handling your business with helpdesk ticketing just became a real option with this build too, centralized, tied to your actual customers... nice The billing features have been good for a long time, not alot of changes to that, but for the most part there didnt need to be. Monitoring your network has gotten great, trend base probing and alerting. This does alot of what a fully functional stand alone NMS does. And they added a cloud for the userbase to share probes, no more asking guys how to do this and thet, then getting a vague answer you have to figure out how to implement - genius Buy powercode today while supplies last!! This message brought to you by adderal and vicodin -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] Props to powercode
The new version have a smart phone friendly web site or app for installer schedules?— Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote: You change your meds or something Steve? First the props to the PTP650, now this. Makes me think that someone has you tied up in a closet or something, and is posting in your place bp On 9/25/2014 10:44 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote: I never have much good to say about anything, but this is a credit where credit is due thing. They have done alot of work on this new version they have out. We are in the process of demoing it and just did a live import of data from our old version The features in this are slick, the interface doesnt look like something from 1982 anymore It seems responsive and intuitive The big thing today was the 477 export. I personally did not want to have to learn any of the back end stuff on prepping the 477 to file for something that doesnt benefit us and is only done twice a year. I allocated until the filing deadline all my time to focusing on actually reading the FCC crap, collecting the data, formatting it, etc. Powercode just released their functional tool, so i set aside two of those days to get a build live and import our data, I had a couple issues, but it was mainly my dumb ass causing them. Got the live data running, ran the tool and uploaded our stuff. The whole process took around ten minutes, and I still dont even know or care exactly what the FCC is getting, all I know is its done, assuming its correct, and I didnt have to stab anybody. If you are looking for a platform that does your goodness for you (this issue comes up about once a month) Powercode has become a top notch product. Managing your guys time is one of the features just implemented, it needs a little fine tuning, but you can have utter morons handling your scheduling and the system makes sure things dont get too out of hand handling your business with helpdesk ticketing just became a real option with this build too, centralized, tied to your actual customers... nice The billing features have been good for a long time, not alot of changes to that, but for the most part there didnt need to be. Monitoring your network has gotten great, trend base probing and alerting. This does alot of what a fully functional stand alone NMS does. And they added a cloud for the userbase to share probes, no more asking guys how to do this and thet, then getting a vague answer you have to figure out how to implement - genius Buy powercode today while supplies last!! This message brought to you by adderal and vicodin -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
