Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Right, but we're talking about using a private /29 for management and a separate public /30 on the same interfaces on the routers. On Sep 27, 2015 6:17 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" wrote: > The main advantage is that with appropriate ACLs on all customer facing > interfaces, and the radios' management IPs in RFC1918 space, there's very > little possibility that somebody could even get to the https login/password > page of a ubnt radio, or the ssh/telnet interface of other licensed band > type radios. > > If you put the radios in public IP space in a /29 along with the OSPF > you're risking exposing their admin interfaces to the world at large. > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard > wrote: > >> I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to >> me... probably the hangover :P >> >> I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or >> the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. >> >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >>> Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but >>> what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: >>> >>> 10.1.255.0/29 >>> .1 Router A >>> .2 Radio A >>> .5 Radio B >>> .6 Router B >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> -- >>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, >>> use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for >>> management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique >>> physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of >>> private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the >>> gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable >>> IP. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>> >>>> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >>>> >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , >>>> no? >>>> >>>> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >>>> Other things like CDP , LDP? >>>> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < >>>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mathew >>>>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in >>>>> /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: "Mathew Howard" >>>>> To: af >>>>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>>>> mode, or PTMP? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>>>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mathew >>>>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -Original Message- >>>>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>>>>> To: af@af
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
The main advantage is that with appropriate ACLs on all customer facing interfaces, and the radios' management IPs in RFC1918 space, there's very little possibility that somebody could even get to the https login/password page of a ubnt radio, or the ssh/telnet interface of other licensed band type radios. If you put the radios in public IP space in a /29 along with the OSPF you're risking exposing their admin interfaces to the world at large. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: > I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to > me... probably the hangover :P > > I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or > the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > >> Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but >> what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: >> >> 10.1.255.0/29 >> .1 Router A >> .2 Radio A >> .5 Radio B >> .6 Router B >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ---------------------- >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, >> use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for >> management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique >> physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of >> private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the >> gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable >> IP. >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >>> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> -- >>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? >>> >>> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >>> Other things like CDP , LDP? >>> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Mathew >>>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in >>>> /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: "Mathew Howard" >>>> To: af >>>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>>> mode, or PTMP? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mathew >>>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> that makes sense >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>>> disable it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -PK >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
That's exactly what I do. Per physical site with a router that speaks BGP+OSPF+MPLS, all radios have their own management /28 which is in its own VLAN, inside 10/8 RFC1918 IP space. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary > /whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have public > IPs for the router interfaces. > > > *From:* Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to > me... probably the hangover :P > > I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or > the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > >> Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but >> what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: >> >> 10.1.255.0/29 >> .1 Router A >> .2 Radio A >> .5 Radio B >> .6 Router B >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------ >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, >> use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for >> management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique >> physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of >> private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the >> gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable >> IP. >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >>> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> -- >>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? >>> >>> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >>> Other things like CDP , LDP? >>> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Mathew >>>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in >>>> /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: "Mathew Howard" >>>> To: af >>>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>>> mode, or PTMP? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mathew >>>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> that makes sense >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>>> disable it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -PK >>>>>> >>
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I've thought about moving to VPLS tunnels from each tower to the edges to reduce the need for publics on most of the infrastructures, but I'm not sure that really saves me much. I'd then need a /30 for every edge instead of every backhaul. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Mathew Howard" To: "af" Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:36:22 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Yep, I think that's what Mike is doing. I skip the /30 most of the time and just use the /29 for everything, because I don't need public IPs on the routers. On Sep 27, 2015 1:29 PM, "Ken Hohhof" < af...@kwisp.com > wrote: Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary /whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have public IPs for the router interfaces. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to me... probably the hangover :P I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: 10.1.255.0/29 .1 Router A .2 Radio A .5 Radio B .6 Router B - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable IP. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other things like CDP , LDP? On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. Tim -Original Message----- From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com > To: af < af@afmug.com > Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -----Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz < pkr...@unwiredltd.com > wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Yeah, I do have a /30 in publics for router-router and the private /29 for management. I don't know if I just happened to put them all on in the correct order or if by running separate OSPF instances prevents the issues in the thread, but I don't have any issues. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Mathew Howard" To: "af" Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:36:22 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Yep, I think that's what Mike is doing. I skip the /30 most of the time and just use the /29 for everything, because I don't need public IPs on the routers. On Sep 27, 2015 1:29 PM, "Ken Hohhof" < af...@kwisp.com > wrote: Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary /whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have public IPs for the router interfaces. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to me... probably the hangover :P I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: 10.1.255.0/29 .1 Router A .2 Radio A .5 Radio B .6 Router B - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable IP. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other things like CDP , LDP? On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. Tim -Original Message----- From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com > To: af < af@afmug.com > Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -----Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz < pkr...@unwiredltd.com > wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants?
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Yep, I think that's what Mike is doing. I skip the /30 most of the time and just use the /29 for everything, because I don't need public IPs on the routers. On Sep 27, 2015 1:29 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: > Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary > /whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have public > IPs for the router interfaces. > > > *From:* Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to > me... probably the hangover :P > > I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or > the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > >> Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but >> what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: >> >> 10.1.255.0/29 >> .1 Router A >> .2 Radio A >> .5 Radio B >> .6 Router B >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> -- >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, >> use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for >> management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique >> physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of >> private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the >> gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable >> IP. >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >>> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> -- >>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? >>> >>> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >>> Other things like CDP , LDP? >>> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Mathew >>>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in >>>> /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: "Mathew Howard" >>>> To: af >>>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>>> mode, or PTMP? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mathew >>>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> that makes sense >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>>> disable it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -PK >>>>>> >>>>>>
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
That's exactly what we do. When we can put the radios on a separate
VLAN, that is great. Otherwise, just make sure the /30 you use for
router<->router is assigned _*before*_ you assign any privates.
Otherwise it messes up the OSPF hello operation.
bp
On 9/27/2015 11:29 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary
/whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have
public IPs for the router interfaces.
*From:* Mathew Howard <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM
*To:* af <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to
me... probably the hangover :P
I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way
or the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal
with vlans.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at
yesterday, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is
what I do:
10.1.255.0/29 <http://10.1.255.0/29>
.1 Router A
.2 Radio A
.5 Radio B
.6 Router B
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
*From: *"Eric Kuhnke" mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the
powerbeam, use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a
separate VLAN for management traffic on a unique management IP...
for example each unique physical site might use vlan60 for radio
management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The
first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start
numbering your radios starting from the second usable IP.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
*From: *"Eric Kuhnke" mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as
a /30 , no?
What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both
sides? Other things like CDP , LDP?
On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart"
mailto:timreichh...@hometowncable.net>> wrote:
Mathew
I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my
backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that
would cause any problems.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "Mathew Howard" mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>>
To: af mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not
passing
I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you
running them in PTP mode, or PTMP?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart
mailto:timreichh...@hometowncable.net>> wrote:
Mathew
please tell me how you got it to work because me
and justin wilson is having hell of time getting
my backhaul link to pass the ospf.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm"
mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with
pbe-5ac-500 not passing
that makes sense
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz
mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com>> wrote:
Links by defau
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary /whatever
for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have public IPs for the
router interfaces.
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to me...
probably the hangover :P
I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or the
other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but what
you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do:
10.1.255.0/29
.1 Router A
.2 Radio A
.5 Radio B
.6 Router B
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Eric Kuhnke"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, use a
/30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for management traffic
on a unique management IP... for example each unique physical site might use
vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The
first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start numbering your
radios starting from the second usable IP.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
From: "Eric Kuhnke"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no?
What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other
things like CDP , LDP?
On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart"
wrote:
Mathew
I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29
on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "Mathew Howard"
To: af
Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP
mode, or PTMP?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart
wrote:
Mathew
please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is
having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm"
To: af@afmug.com
Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
that makes sense
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz
wrote:
Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability
to disable it.
-PK
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy
/sarcasm
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside
why did they remove wds?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup
wrote:
I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have
Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast
will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will
not work.
Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured
correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants?
On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work
correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "George Skorup"
To: af@afmug.com
Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to me... probably the hangover :P I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but > what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: > > 10.1.255.0/29 > .1 Router A > .2 Radio A > .5 Radio B > .6 Router B > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > -- > *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, > use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for > management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique > physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of > private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the > gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable > IP. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > >> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> -- >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? >> >> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >> Other things like CDP , LDP? >> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" >> wrote: >> >>> Mathew >>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 >>> on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> -- >>> -Original Message- >>> From: "Mathew Howard" >>> To: af >>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>> mode, or PTMP? >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Mathew >>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> that makes sense >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>> disable it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -PK >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >>>>> /sarcasm >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> why did they remove wds? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data >>>>> - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >>>>> allowed over the RF interface, thus
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: 10.1.255.0/29 .1 Router A .2 Radio A .5 Radio B .6 Router B - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Eric Kuhnke" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable IP. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other things like CDP , LDP? On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. Tim -Original Message- From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com > To: af < af@afmug.com > Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz < pkr...@unwiredltd.com > wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message----- From: "George Skorup" < geo...@cbcast.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable IP. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > -- > *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? > > What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? > Other things like CDP , LDP? > On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" > wrote: > >> Mathew >> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 >> on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >> >> Tim >> >> -------------- >> -----Original Message- >> From: "Mathew Howard" >> To: af >> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >> mode, or PTMP? >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >> >>> Mathew >>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> -- >>> -Original Message- >>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> that makes sense >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>> disable it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -PK >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> why did they remove wds? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data >>>> - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >>>> allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not >>>> work. >>>> >>>> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If >>>> not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >>>> >>>> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>>> >>>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? >>>> Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> >>>> From: "George Skorup" >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>>> >>>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>>> >>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic >>>> not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and >>>> they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing >>>> nbma setup. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
*nods* I do that as well. I keep my privates and publics in separate OSPF instances, areas, etc. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "George Skorup" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:28:57 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I do a private /29 for radio management and a public /30 for routing. The key with that setup is making sure the public is the first address on the interface making the private secondary. Not only stupid traceroutes, but I have seen stupid routing problems without that too. On 9/25/2015 10:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Eric Kuhnke" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other things like CDP , LDP? On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. Tim -Original Message- From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com > To: af < af@afmug.com > Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz < pkr...@unwiredltd.com > wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" < geo...@cbcast.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I do a private /29 for radio management and a public /30 for routing.
The key with that setup is making sure the public is the first address
on the interface making the private secondary. Not only stupid
traceroutes, but I have seen stupid routing problems without that too.
On 9/25/2015 10:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
*From: *"Eric Kuhnke"
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no?
What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides?
Other things like CDP , LDP?
On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart"
<mailto:timreichh...@hometowncable.net>> wrote:
Mathew
I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls
in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "Mathew Howard" mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>>
To: af mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them
in PTP mode, or PTMP?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart
mailto:timreichh...@hometowncable.net>> wrote:
Mathew
please tell me how you got it to work because me and
justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul
link to pass the ospf.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm"
mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not
passing
that makes sense
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz
mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com>>
wrote:
Links by default now run under WDS.. So they
removed the ability to disable it.
-PK
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of* That
One Guy /sarcasm
*Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with
pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside
why did they remove wds?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup
mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
I don't have any of the ac radios, only M.
Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check
box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will
not be allowed over the RF interface, thus
OSPF (which is multicast) will not work.
Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF
configured correctly? If not that, then I have
no idea. Kick it in the pants?
On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
so if the multicast filtering can cause
ospf not to work correctly? Even there is
no option for wds on the newer firmware?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: "George Skorup"
mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>>
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with
pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Does this new 11ac stuff have
multicast filtering like the M series? I
think it's on the advanced tab. I made
that mistake once.
On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Eric Kuhnke" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other things like CDP , LDP? On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. Tim -Original Message- From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com > To: af < af@afmug.com > Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz < pkr...@unwiredltd.com > wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" < geo...@cbcast.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I don't think any of mine have 7.1.4 on them, I think they are all either still on 7.1.1 or 7.2-beta. oh... are we talking about OSPF PTP, or the radio's PTP mode? I just have ospf setup as normal broadcast links. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > I'm actually using /29s too - with both radios and the router on each end > of the link in the same subnet. As far as I can remember, pretty much > everything is just at the default settings. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Eric Kuhnke > wrote: > >> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? >> >> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >> Other things like CDP , LDP? >> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" >> wrote: >> >>> Mathew >>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 >>> on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> ------------------ >>> -Original Message- >>> From: "Mathew Howard" >>> To: af >>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>> mode, or PTMP? >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Mathew >>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> that makes sense >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>> disable it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -PK >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >>>>> /sarcasm >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> why did they remove wds? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data >>>>> - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >>>>> allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not >>>>> work. >>>>> >>>>> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? >>>>> If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >>>>> >>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>>>> >>>>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? >>>>> Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> >>>>> From: "George Skorup" >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>>>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>>>> >>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf >>>>> traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as >>>>> backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware >>>>> 7.1.4xc >>>>> and not doing nbma setup. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I'm actually using /29s too - with both radios and the router on each end of the link in the same subnet. As far as I can remember, pretty much everything is just at the default settings. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? > > What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? > Other things like CDP , LDP? > On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" > wrote: > >> Mathew >> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 >> on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >> >> Tim >> >> -- >> -Original Message----- >> From: "Mathew Howard" >> To: af >> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >> mode, or PTMP? >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >> >>> Mathew >>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> -- >>> -Original Message- >>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> that makes sense >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>> disable it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -PK >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> why did they remove wds? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data >>>> - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >>>> allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not >>>> work. >>>> >>>> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If >>>> not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >>>> >>>> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>>> >>>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? >>>> Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> >>>> From: "George Skorup" >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>>> >>>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>>> >>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic >>>> not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and >>>> they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing >>>> nbma setup. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other things like CDP , LDP? On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" wrote: > Mathew > I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 > on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. > > Tim > > -- > -Original Message- > From: "Mathew Howard" > To: af > Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, > or PTMP? > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < > timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: > >> Mathew >> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >> >> Tim >> >> ------ >> -Original Message----- >> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" >> To: af@afmug.com >> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> that makes sense >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz >> wrote: >> >>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>> disable it. >>> >>> >>> >>> -PK >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >>> /sarcasm >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>> >>> >>> >>> why did they remove wds? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup >>> wrote: >>> >>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - >>> Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >>> allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. >>> >>> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If >>> not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >>> >>> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>> >>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even >>> there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> >>> From: "George Skorup" >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>> >>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>> >>> I find you need WDS enabled >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic >>> not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and >>> they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing >>> nbma setup. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Mathew I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. Tim -Original Message- From: "Mathew Howard" To: af Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Mathew I am running PTP mode. Tim -Original Message- From: "Mathew Howard" To: af Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Mathew I am running it under PTP mode. Tim -Original Message- From: "Mathew Howard" To: af Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart wrote: Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: > Mathew > please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is > having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. > > Tim > > -- > -Original Message- > From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" > To: af@afmug.com > Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > that makes sense > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz > wrote: > >> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >> disable it. >> >> >> >> -PK >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> >> >> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >> >> >> >> why did they remove wds? >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup >> wrote: >> >> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - >> Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >> allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. >> >> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If >> not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >> >> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >> >> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even >> there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >> >> Tim >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: "George Skorup" >> To: af@afmug.com >> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >> >> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >> >> I find you need WDS enabled >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic >> not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and >> they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing >> nbma setup. >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > >
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim -Original Message- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: > Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to > disable it. > > > > -PK > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > > > I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside > > > > why did they remove wds? > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup wrote: > > I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - > Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be > allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. > > Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If > not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? > > On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: > > so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even > there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? > > Tim > > -----Original Message- > > From: "George Skorup" > To: af@afmug.com > Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I > think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. > > On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: > > I find you need WDS enabled > > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart > Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic > not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and > they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing > nbma setup. > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup mailto:geo...@cbcast.com> > wrote: I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" mailto:geo...@cbcast.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I thought they were just always supposed to be transparent bridges, so wds isn't needed. I do have OSPF working over several PowerBeam AC links, and I didn't do anything special to make it work. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:27 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside > > why did they remove wds? > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup wrote: > >> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - >> Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >> allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. >> >> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If >> not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >> >> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >> >>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even >>> there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> -----Original Message- >>> >>>> From: "George Skorup" >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>>> >>>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>>> >>>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf >>>>> traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as >>>>> backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware >>>>> 7.1.4xc >>>>> and not doing nbma setup. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup wrote: > I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - > Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be > allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. > > Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If > not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? > > On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: > >> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even >> there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >> >> Tim >> >> -Original Message- >> >>> From: "George Skorup" >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>> >>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>> >>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic >>>> not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and >>>> they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing >>>> nbma setup. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- From: "George Skorup" To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Well first found out where they are dropping.. First thing to try is to ensure you do not have multicast filtering enabled. -PK
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Peter if it drops how do I fix that issue? Tim -Original Message- > From: "Peter Kranz" > To: af@afmug.com > Date: 09/24/15 11:00 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > This should be relatively easy to diagnose using onboard tcpdump to determine > where the OSPF hello packets are being dropped. > > -PK
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
This should be relatively easy to diagnose using onboard tcpdump to determine where the OSPF hello packets are being dropped. -PK
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -Original Message- > From: "George Skorup" > To: af@afmug.com > Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I > think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. > > On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: > > I find you need WDS enabled > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart > > Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM > > To: af@afmug.com > > Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > > > I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not > > passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and > > they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing > > nbma setup. > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
See there isnt no option for WDS in 7.1.4 me and justin wilson looked and ubnt did away from this on 7.x firmware. -Original Message- > From: "Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T)" > To: af@afmug.com > Date: 09/24/15 10:45 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > I find you need WDS enabled > > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart > Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not > passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they > are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma > setup. > > Tim
Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I find you need WDS enabled -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim
