[sc-issues] [Issue 110384] Extremely slow scrolling in calc when charts are displayed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110384 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 5 22:18:16 + 2011 --- I just tried 2 reproduce on debian squeeze with kde4 and opengl (debian OO 3.2.1-11). Generating the graphs takes about 2 sec with AA on by dual core 3GHz. Tried to export to xls and view with Excel (under wine) but the indirect addressing used doesn't seem to work in Excel. Another bug? Unfortunately I can not compare now. But would not be surprised is MS caches the bitmap after rendering. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 114756] Notes not exported to PDF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114756 Issue #|114756 Summary|Notes not exported to PDF Component|Drawing Version|OOo 3.2.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|save-export Assigned to|graphicsneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 26 13:53:55 + 2010 --- When I add a note to a Draw drawing and then export to pdf the note is lost. This occors even when using FileExport as PDF with Export Notes checked. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 106692] Anti-aliasing makes move/ resize slow
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 7 07:01:55 + 2010 --- On Kubuntu Karmic with OO 3.1.1 grbabing the object will take 30 seconds (AA on is 6x slower). The same thing on Debian Squeeze with OO 3.2.0 will take 3 seconds (AA), With AA off less then 0.5 seconds (6x slower). It appears major improvement happened in OO 3.2. Good news. But still AA is 6x slower, which you will notice on large or complex drawings. The original question was: can we turn off AA on drags to improve speed. Want to try with the original drawing now? There are about 3 elements in the original. And it get's exponentially slower. Yes that's a lot. Inkscape does it, but then I need to import svg into OO, which is still problamatic.. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 106692] Anti-aliasing makes move/ resize slow
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 12:56:14 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=68777) Example drawing - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 106692] Anti-aliasing makes move/ resize slow
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 6 13:08:45 + 2010 --- I check the example on https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/499020 and did not find real problems there. Instead try to work a bit with my example Silkscreen.odg. This is about 1/4 of a silkscreen (a layer of a PCB board), the original is exponentially slower. It is produced from Gerber files, printed to pdf using cups-pdf, then imported into OpenOffice. You can get roughly the same results by printing to svg, then import into OO as svg. You will notice that just picking up the group and draging (yeah in the semi-transparent mode I mean) takes about 5 seconds to respond with AA turned off. The same takes 20 seconds with AA on. Then drop the object, go get some coffee and wait for OO to respond again. I kid you not. The group consists of 7619 element, which may seem much, but how fast can you count when you've got 4 cores running at 2GHz. And the original pdf had no problems even though it's size was 8MB. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 106692] Anti-aliasing makes move/ resize slow
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106692 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Nov 10 17:21:34 + 2009 --- I think you are missing the point here: When I try to drag (move) a group of objects it can take 10 sec for OO to responds. In the mean time it seems to freeze. I do not think this is 'defined behavior'. I guess that the responsiveness of OO is not defined in terms of time (should start dragging within 0.1 seconds) or not defined at all. Works as defined can not really be an excuse when the behavior has not been completely defined. As said: it is this slow, whether used on a dual core 1.2GHz or a 1.2GHz duron. The only way to do real work now is to disable AA completely. Which is obviously worse then during move, copy etc. Did you actually try it with complex objects? Do you need one from me? Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 103395] Drag edit actions are by default constrained
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103395 Issue #|103395 Summary|Drag edit actions are by default constrained Component|Drawing Version|OOo 3.0.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|graphicsneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 7 20:39:05 + 2009 --- In Draw 3.0.1 on Debian when I perform a drag action it is by default constrained. I mean: moves are constrained to horizontal/vertical, resizes are constrained to keeping the aspect ratio. When I want to draw a rectangle it is constrained to a square, and so on. To do unconstrained drags I need to use shift-drag. Under Windows this behavior is opposite. Using shift then switches to the constrained action. Using both platforms this behavior is confusing to me. Can a select the Windows behavior under Linux? Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 101406] Slow context menu pop-up on right click
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101406 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 29 08:58:36 + 2009 --- I have about 300 fonts. After looking at the installed extensions during installation I decided there are to many. Now I have disabled the unnecessary ones and now the problem SEEMED to have gone away. After checking the same on another machine we suspected the Wiki Publisher extension to cause the problem. But now it seem thats opening toolsextension manager and then enabling or disabling extensions makes the problem go away - UNTIL you restart Writer. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 101406] Slow context menu pop-up on right click
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101406 Issue #|101406 Summary|Slow context menu pop-up on right click Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.0.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 28 13:03:04 + 2009 --- In Writer the context menu takes about 15 sec. to pop up when clicking on a word (no spelling error) in Writer. In the mean time Writer seems to be hanging. The whole idea of context menus is to have quick access to the applicable options. The expected context menu shows 'Default Formatting' on the top line. Note then when there is a spelling error the context menu pops op within seconds with suggestions for corrections. This behavior did not occur with OO 2.4.2. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 49991] Allow embedding SVG vector graphics into all documents.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 16:02:24 + 2009 --- Right olo! But after you saved it, and editted with Inkscape, you will want to reimport it. And then restore all the image properties, like position, anchor, etc. I do that all the time, even with embedded Draw objects (since you can not zoom inside Writer). And it is a pain. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 99023] Broken polylines on save/r eopen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99023 Issue #|99023 Summary|Broken polylines on save/reopen Component|Drawing Version|OOo 3.0.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|save-export Assigned to|graphicsneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 8 21:23:44 + 2009 --- I import svg into Draw quite a lot, using the svg-import-1.2.2 extension. This allows me to print to my virtual svg printer (a modified virtual pdf printer) from any application, like electronic schematics drawing programs, Autocad etc. I've noticed that many time 'closed' shapes get broken in the process and attributed this to the import filter. But now I noticed that it may be caused by Draw it self! As an example I included a 'Zener.svg'. With Inkscape (or firefox) you can see it is a simple drawing. After importing this into draw it looks like 'Zener_before_save.pdf'. Save the file to 'Zener.odg' all is still well. But then closing and reopening 'Zener.odg' I get 'Zener_after_save_reopen.pdf'. Conclusion: Draw does not save this shape well, or breaks it open reopening. This problem appears on Linux as well as Windows, and using OO 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 3.0.0 and 3.0.1. A big hug for fixes this! Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 99023] Broken polylines on save/r eopen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99023 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 8 21:24:55 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60031) Original svg - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 99023] Broken polylines on save/r eopen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99023 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 8 21:25:49 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60032) After import prior to save - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 99023] Broken polylines on save/r eopen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99023 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 8 21:26:44 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60033) Saved odg - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 99023] Broken polylines on save/r eopen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99023 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 8 21:27:14 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60034) After save and reopen - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 49991] Allow embedding SVG vector graphics into all documents.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Sat Jan 24 12:27:27 + 2009 --- I think mba is not holding a discussion but providing a solution. Note how similar it is to M$ OLE solution: - each object type can be embedded in an OLE container as the container does not need to know the contents - each object provides a server for edit (embedded edit) and open (standalone edit) - the object's server provides a preview for display and printing (bitmap, wmf or emf) - better would be: the objects server proves a rasterizer for printing and displaying (see bryancole above) For OO: - using inkscape for 'edit' (I mean editting embedded in f.i. writer) won't work as inkscape is not a OLE server - but it will work for 'open' as mba described - who needs 'edit'? Draw does only 'edit' and not 'open' which is a big frustration when trying to edit a complex, large draw object embedded in writer. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 7 10:26:55 + 2009 --- I have just verified on go-oo 3.0 the problem occurs exactly the same as with OO 2.4.1. Additionally I found the following: - If you go into the object (you will need to zoon in 400% before opening the object), you will note the fat lines are fine inside the object. - selecting the fat lines and right-click- split they will be broken done partly to simple lines - exitting the object, all lines will still be shown as hair lines - creating a pdf from the document will show the split up lines are fat Appearently there is also a difference between what is displayed on screen and what is exported to pdf. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 7 10:27:19 + 2009 --- I have just verified on go-oo 3.0 the problem occurs exactly the same as with OO 2.4.1. Additionally I found the following: - If you go into the object (you will need to zoon in 400% before opening the object), you will note the fat lines are fine inside the object. - selecting the fat lines and right-click- split they will be broken done partly to simple lines - exitting the object, all lines will still be shown as hair lines - creating a pdf from the document will show the split up lines are fat Appearently there is also a difference between what is displayed on screen and what is exported to pdf. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 Issue #|97815 Summary|Inaccurate line width rendering of Draw 8 objects Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.4.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|printing Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 22:05:10 + 2009 --- The problem occurs using OO 2.4.1 on debian Linux and Windows XP. I have not tested on OO 3.0 as it is not in Debian testing yet. Now idea how go-oo handles this either. The attached drawings are obtained after importing SVG drawings using the SVG import extension. I have obviously taken just a few polygons from the original drawing which was proprietary. The source was an Autocad drawing printed to a SVG virtual printer. The SVG itself looks OK in Inkscape. Importing the SVG leads to the file 'original.odg' which for the purpose of this example should be considered OK. Exporting this to PDF shows what I get on my printer which is also OK. Copy-paste to writer lead to the upper drawing in Writer (embedded.odt), which is made up of grouped writer drawing elements and is also OK as can easily be seen in the PDF embedded.pdf). However, I normally prefer to paste the drawing as a Draw 8 object, because this embeds the original drawing in Writer, which I can later edit in Draw if needed. Also since it is an object, text wraps around the entire object. The problem is the rendering of the Draw 8 object (the bottom drawing). As can be seen the line widths are lost and set to minimal for certain poly lines, but not for simple lines. You will notice that breaking these polylines into simple lines will restore the line widths as rendered by writer, but then the lines are broken and can not be glued back. You can imagine that the result of a complete imported Autocad drawings looks quite unreadable as line widths are used in technical drawings to distinguish between solid parts and all kinds of other symbols, arrows, size indicators etc. I really hope this can be fixed before 3.0.1. Thanks Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 22:06:28 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=59189) original.odg - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 22:07:08 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=59190) original.pdf - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 22:07:53 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=59191) embedded.odt - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 22:08:29 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=59192) embedded.pdf - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97815] Inaccurate line width rend ering of Draw 8 objects
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97815 --- Additional comments from ft...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 6 22:08:42 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=59193) embedded.pdf - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 49991] Allow embedding SVG vector graphics into all documents.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 14:34:28 + 2008 --- The above would be true if there was an easy way to export svg's, edit them in a seperate tool and them reimport into OO while keeping placement and other attributes intact. At present it is already possible to import svg's using the SVG import extension. This gives 95% accurate imports and it is slow (java?). Even if you don't like OO Draw (which I happen to do) you can quickly and easily make small changes to the imported SVG. It seems to me we are on the last mile to 100% accurate imports. Compiled code would improve the speed a great deal. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ui-issues] [Issue 83459] OOo opens impossible big w indow
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83459 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 8 19:19:07 + 2008 --- Just tested with Debian Lenny (openoffice 2.4.1-6). No problem here. I have a 1280x1024 screen in portrait mode. When closing either maximized, or sized just a little smaller then the maximum window size and then switching to 1024x768 (also portrait mode) openoffice starts with the window maximized to full screen. Imho this is the desired behavior. Greets, Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 90569] copy-pasting a column or r ow makes freezes Calc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90569 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 07:37:01 + 2008 --- Reproduced on Win XP, 2.4.1 + nl language pack 2.4.1rc2. Note that pressing v prior to ctrl-v is essential. A normal ctrl-c, ctrl-v sequence does not create the problem. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 81984] Memory leak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81984 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 15:43:24 + 2008 --- er: I am aware that Task Manager is not ideal, but is the only tool I have for this. Note that when at the end of the day all documents are closed still almost 30MB is actually allocated more that at the start. The code needed to handle no documents is the same, so you could say that 30MB has leaked. If that is caused by unnecesarrily loaded code, or by data structures that should have been freed makes no difference to my poor old computer. You may get the right feeling if you try XP Pro with 512MB of RAM for a day, and try to do some actual office work, virus scannner, e-mail, adobe reader, MS Word reader, internet explorer and Openoffice simultaneously (respectively: 43MB, 18MB, 60MB, 13MB, 28MB, 69MB - and some 160MB needed by XP kernel memory). Bye for now, Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 81984] Memory leak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81984 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 30 09:14:32 + 2008 --- kpalagin, repeatedly opening a new (empty) writer document and closing it does not noticably increase memory use. in 2.4.0 (XP). With Calc I noticed memory use suddenly decreasing, and virtually memory increasing after closing the spread sheet. I'll record memory use today at startup and end of day after a days work and let you know the result. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 81984] Memory leak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81984 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 30 14:16:41 + 2008 --- Started working today with according to Task Manager: Process Memory VMM start soffice.bin 41084kB 17992kB end soffice.bin 69144kB 51468kB in both cases with empty OO window (all documents closed). If this is not a memory leak, then at least large objects remain allocated that are not related to an open document. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 88730] Shell extension property h andler
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88730 Issue #|88730 Summary|Shell extension property handler Component|framework Version|OOo 2.4.0 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 25 11:56:53 + 2008 --- Openoffice (Windows) comes with a Shell Extension that allows document properties to be accessed from outside OO. This has several usefull uses: -Some properties can be browsed from Explorer -Explorer can display a preview of the document, espcially Signed documents show a stamp on signed documents -Indexing services have access to keywords, document title etc. The document properties can also be displayed in the Detailed view of explorer. Normally this view only shows filename, date, size etc. However Explorer allows to add additional properties to this view. This allows the user to sort documents by the internal document title or other exposed properties. A usefull feature would be to show also names and dates of the users that signed the document. This allows to quickly see if all needed signature have been placed on documents. Moreover, currently when documents have been signed by multiple users, OO's internal save date becomes the date the first user signed the document. for unsigned documents the file system date is used. This causes inconsistancy between file system date and the date shown in the document. Proposed behavior: a property Signed On (the date of the first signature) a property Signed By (the names of all the users that put a signture on it). Our application: We have written an app that uses the Shell Extensions to Extract Author, Filename, Title, Keywords and date. This quickly creates a html document with links to all the documents in a folder and its sub-folders and the relavant properties. Right now it shows (incorrectly) the file system date, which is diffent from the Changed Date field shown on printed documents. This tools is internally used for registering documents as required by QA systems like ISO9000. We believe such functionality will benefit others considering electronically signed documents as well. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 08:44:13 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52645) Test case: look into the file Filelist.pdf for explanation - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 56629] PDF convert tool - relativ e links to files from file system are converte d as URLs not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56629 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 13:54:13 + 2008 --- I'm sorry! I need to correct the bug report above (Sat Apr 5 21:25:21 + 2008). Please disregard all of that. I have now traced down the problem to the following: - relative path checked - open with PDF reader checked - path contains *spaces*. The spaces are converted to %20, this is correct for URI but incorrect for remote goto actions (generated because of open with PDF reader). This can easily be reproduced. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 Issue #|88013 Summary|Broken relative path when exporting to pdf Component|gsl Version|OOo 2.4.0 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|pl Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 13:57:31 + 2008 --- When exporting a writer document to pdf links to external pdf documents can be broken in some cases. I have traced down the problem to the following: - relative path checked - open with PDF reader checked - path contains *spaces*. The spaces are converted to %20, this is correct for URI but incorrect for remote goto actions (generated because of open with PDF reader). This can easily be reproduced. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 88013] Broken relative path when exporting to pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88013 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 7 19:38:56 + 2008 --- Friends, I used WinXP, 2.4.0 US + 2.4rc6 dutch. The relative link was to a pdf document, created by importing a html document which contains relative links into a section (i.e. a linked html document). The link shows as a full path (starting with file:///) in the odt, although it is actually relative as can be seen when moving the document to another location. In other word similar to rainer's above, but ending with pdf). I only checked the options described, so exporting then to pdf, with PDF/A-1 UNchecked. rainer, in your case I wonder how the string inside the pdf actually looks. I would expect (./linked%20path/linked.pdf) It may be the case that your pdf viewer accepts this (as does kpdf), but Acrobat does not. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 56629] PDF convert tool - relativ e links to files from file system are converte d as URLs not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56629 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 5 21:25:21 + 2008 --- This new feature in 2.4 seems to be a little broken. I propose to reopen it. Here is my case: import a html document with relative url's to pdf's into Writer. When viewing the link in Writer the link shows as an absolute path, but this path is built from the path of the current writer document. As a result can be: Linux: file:///path/file.pdf Linux: smb:///path/file.pdf Windows: file:///c:\path\file.pdf Depending on how the folder is mounted/connected to. Now exporting the pdf: -on the Windows machine -relative path checked - open with PDF reader checked a pdf file is created with a link with a relative path using remote goto actions with file:///./file.pdf. Opening the file in Acrobat on Windows and clicking the link gives an error that the file does not exist. Opening on Linux as an embedded pdf (in Acrobat 8) in konqueror opens the link fine. Opening on Linux directly in Acrobat 8 and clicking the link also gives and error. I have not checked exporting the pdf from the Linux version (waiting for 2.4.0 to go into testing on Debian). But from the documentation I get that smb: (kioslave in KDE) is not supported yet. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 66538] Hardware acceleration brea ks the display of pictures in some slides.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66538 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 9 17:27:34 + 2008 --- Yes, and it still occurs with OO2.3.1 on Debian Lenny with xserver.xorg 1.3 (1:7.2-5) the lastest testing xerver. Check out the attachment What I have is a symbol made using a group of polylines. Editing, or during presentation with HW acc. turned off, displays just fine. During presentation with HW acc. turned on the whole symbol fill black. Converting the symbol to curves does not help, converting to bitmap turns the symbol into black filled permanently. Found the problem on 2 separate debian lenny systems 1, with modern intel graphics controller, other on very old ati. Seems to be reproducible and persistent across OO versions. My guess: the problem is in Impress. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 66538] Hardware acceleration brea ks the display of pictures in some slides.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66538 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 9 17:24:25 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51445) Simple symbol inside Impress slide - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 85907] Add hidden attribute to re vision marking
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85907 Issue #|85907 Summary|Add hidden attribute to revision marking Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.3.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 6 09:14:51 + 2008 --- When recording revisions new text is shown underlined and deleted text is shown strike through by default. Additionally the paragraph is marked. We would like the possibility to only mark the changed paragraph. This would require new text to be unmarked. This is already possibly using the attribute none in the revision marking setup. * Additionaly it requires the attribute hidden for deleted text. * Note 1: the best we can do at this time is to mark deleted text with attribute background but this shows a large white gap in place of deleted text. * Note 2: currently you can mark deleted text with the attribute none. This allow to show added and deleted text without any distinction. Great, but why would we need that? Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 81984] Memory leak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81984 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 22 18:07:07 + 2007 --- Frank, The issue is the leak, not the foot print. Actually the startup memory use from OO2.3 is not so much larger then 2.2.1. I think opening a spreadsheet and then closing it again but ending up with 54 + 28 - 40 - 20 = 22MB memory more in use can be called a memory leak (but not necessarily). Similar effects occur under WinXP Pro. Metrics have been determined using taskman.exe I don't think the memory use is so small that it goes unnoticed. Actually when you work all day with OpenOffice (problem may be in Writer too) you will notice the problem in other more qualitative ways (the disk access LED). I will gladly help to reproduce this problem if you would please reopen it. Ferry Toth - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 82199] Formfilter does not work o n booleans (JDBC)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82199 Issue #|82199 Summary|Formfilter does not work on booleans (JDBC) Component|Database access Version|OOo 2.3 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 2 20:26:29 + 2007 --- This problem has been found using postgresql over jdbc (both in OO2.0.4 on debian and 2.3 on w2k and wxp). Step 1 Here's the results for Autofilter on a table: With postgresql over JDBC you need to use the mixed mode. Using default the error is: error boolean = integer (it tries to compare boolean field billable = 1) Using SQLand Access the error is: error setting filter criterium (it tries to compare Billable IS TRUE) Using Mixed, Autofilter works fine. Step 2 Using Autofilter on a form in Mixed mode also works. Step 3 But using Formfilter on a form (still in mixed mode): Error: operator does not exist: boolean = integer. Once a boolean filter is applied using the Autofilter, you can go to FormFilter and apply additional (non boolean) filters without error. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81983] Writer hangs on opening a second document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81983 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 1 14:04:50 + 2007 --- Yes, it happens under WinXP as well. It may very well be a duplicate of issue 81988. It seems to be related to the timing during the startup fase. This will make it difficult to reproduce on faster machines I expect. Nevertheless I think it is an important issue, which did not occur with previous version of OO. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81983] Writer hangs on opening a second document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81983 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 19:40:52 + 2007 --- I have noticed the same problem under XP Pro, but not consistently. There seems to be a relation with the activity going while the file is being opened. It could be that in that case I tried to open a 3rd document while the 2nd is still being loaded. I can confirm that I saw multiple copies of soffice.exe and soffice.bin in the task manager. I'll try to see if this can be reproduced. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81983] Writer hangs on opening a second document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81983 Issue #|81983 Summary|Writer hangs on opening a second document Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.3 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|open-import Assigned to|mru Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 20:08:14 + 2007 --- With 1 writer document open, double click in explorer on a second writer document. The document appears to open, but then OO freezes. CPU load is 0%. Windows Taskbar shows 2 instances of soffice.exe and 2 instances of soffice.bin. Same happens with Calc open and then opening a second writer. After a long while (enough to write this report) the bin and exe with the smaller memory footprint close, and the freeze ends (OO works normally again) Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 81984] Memory leak
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81984 Issue #|81984 Summary|Memory leak Component|Spreadsheet Version|OOo 2.3 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows 2000 Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|spreadsheet Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 20:21:55 + 2007 --- Start with an empty Calc document uses about 40MB of memory + 20MB of VM (virtual memory) in soffice.bin. Closing that and starting a new empty Calc doc goes to the same memory footprint. Then closing the empty document, and opening a very simple spreadsheet (no calculations, just text) increases the memory footprint to 60MB + 34 MB. Closing that again (no windows open anymore) the footprint goes to 54MB + 28MB. This is a much larger footprint for OO2.3 compared to 2.2.1 Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 64585] Embeded relative urls beco me fixed urls when exporting to PDF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 17 13:11:23 + 2007 --- Confirmed in OOo 2.2.1 as well: Importing a html into a section in a Writer document leaves the relative URL's in order. No problem here. Exporting to PDF turns them into an absolute file URL. That is really to bad! I'm using this procedure to create a pdf document that is and Table of Contents of other PDF documents. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 79240] Datapilot with datasource query and named or unnamed parameters malfunct ions
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79240 Issue #|79240 Summary|Datapilot with datasource query and named or unnamed p |arameters malfunctions Component|Spreadsheet Version|OOo 2.2.1 Platform|PC URL|http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=2549 OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|viewing Assigned to|spreadsheet Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 4 20:56:24 + 2007 --- When the datapilot is setup to connect to a datasource of type query that contains a named parameter (WHERE column = :criterium) of unnamed (WHERE column = ?) it fails with a message like unknown parameter or so. The expected behavior is to pop up the parameter dialog box. This occurs with the databases mentioned in the url above, as well as postgresql using the JDBC driver (my project). Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 75872] crash with postgresql-jdbc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75872 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 19 19:31:55 + 2007 --- I've tested the fix with OO 2.2 RC3 dutch w2k and it appears to fix this problem. Connection to postgresql using jdbc seems to be working fine now. Tested viewing tables and forms applying filters. Not tested: data entry. Thanks for the fix. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 76487] Broken JDBC postgresql dri ver
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76487 Issue #|76487 Summary|Broken JDBC postgresql driver Component|Database access Version|OOo 2.2 RC3 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows 2000 Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 19:36:01 + 2007 --- Base crashes after a long wait when viewing a table (or more generally when retrieving data by opening a table or by opening a form) from our postgresql server through the jdbc driver. Up to OO 2.1 the jdbc driver to postgresql has been the most usable (in terms of supporting date/time fields, boolean fields etc.). With 2.2 RC3 (dutch version) it seems to have become unusable. Haven't been able to test it with english or later versions. Take care, Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 75436] Filtering form records by using an unbound control on the form
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75436 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 6 21:14:35 + 2007 --- In the mean while, is there a code snippet or example available somewhere that I can use to get this working? Thanks, Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 75434] Incorrect number of record s displayed in form navigator
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75434 Issue #|75434 Summary|Incorrect number of records displayed in form navigato |r Component|Database access Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 20:29:15 + 2007 --- When running a form with a table control only the number of records retrieved is initially shown. I.e. when there is room on the grid for 10 records the navigator shows 10 (which probably reflects the number of records actually retrieved). However, navigating to the last records (in my case 68) updates the number of records to 68. The user may incorrectly assume by this behavior all available records are displayed - 58 have been lost. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 75436] Filtering form records by using an unbound control on the form
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75436 Issue #|75436 Summary|Filtering form records by using an unbound control on |the form Component|Database access Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 20:52:41 + 2007 --- When using forms you can apply autofilters, and formfilters, but you can not create a custom filter easily to f.i. enter a start and end date. It would be *very* usefull to be able to add unbound controls on a form (say StartDate and EndDate) and then have the datasource on the form use those controls to filter the records, i.e. select * from atable where Date :StartDate and Date :EndDate It appears to my from the SDK (see DevelopersGuide chapter 13.5.1 section Parameters) that this can be done by adding the controls to some list of listeners (using com.sun.star.form.XDatabaseParameterBroadcaster) so that they get resolved when the query runs (done by com.sun.star.form.XDatabaseParameterListeners). However, it is unclear what code to use to do that, and the SDK mentions at this time it can not be done from Basic. To me it seems that unbound controls on the form should *always* by listening to queries that require input. Why else would they be there? Also it is not clear (to me) from the SDK if the unbound control is listening to queries run by other forms or if a special syntax is needed to access a control on another form (like MS Access does). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 72407] Printing recorded changes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72407 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 19 14:47:26 + 2007 --- I think it would be very nice to be able to print the red lined cells as they are shown on screen. Maybe it it even possible to have the notes (info about the change) printed in a seprate list. But there is also something to say to keep Compare Documents and Record Changes the same as in Writer. I'll vote for being able to print what I see on screen now! Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 72407] Printing recorded changes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72407 User ftoth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Version|OOo 2.0.4 |OOo 2.1 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 22:32:38 + 2007 --- The problem still exists in v2.1 (windows) and 2.04 (linux) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 73303] EMF import looses text
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73303 Issue #|73303 Summary|EMF import looses text Component|Drawing Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|open-import Assigned to|wg Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 06:24:52 -0800 2007 --- The following EMF (enhanced meta file) looses it's text when imported or opened into any open office components (writer, draw, etc). However, Windows XP viewer show no problems with the metafile, nor does IE7. Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 73303] EMF import looses text
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73303 User ftoth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |42033) Sample EMF file --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 06:28:20 -0800 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=42033) Sample EMF file - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 73303] EMF import looses text
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73303 User ftoth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |42034) Result of import sh | |own in PDF --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 06:31:45 -0800 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=42034) Result of import shown in PDF - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 72407] Printing recorded changes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72407 User ftoth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |42036) Test Calc sheet sho | |wing the problem --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 06:36:25 -0800 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=42036) Test Calc sheet showing the problem - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 72442] Shrink to fit does not sav e correctly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72442 User ftoth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |41416) Sample --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 13 12:07:23 -0800 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=41416) Sample - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 72442] Shrink to fit does not sav e correctly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72442 User ftoth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |41417) Second version --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 13 12:21:36 -0800 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=41417) Second version - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 72442] Shrink to fit does not sav e correctly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72442 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 13 12:31:40 -0800 2006 --- Hello Frank, I have sent a Bill of Materials will sensive information deleted. The second version is best to demonstrate my problem. Cell D4 and D8 show what I mean: they have been formatted with automatic reflow (I'm using the dutch version so hope this is the correct translation). The rows have been formatted with Optimal Row Height. On last save each cell had the correct height. However on opening the file again, text falls out of the cell. Worse, this happens in print preview and print as well. You can reproduce this with selecting ROWS 1 - 11, FormatRowOptimal Row heightSaveFileReload Thank for helping, Ferry - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 72407] Printing recorded changes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72407 Issue #|72407 Summary|Printing recorded changes Component|Spreadsheet Version|OOo 2.0.4 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|printing Assigned to|spreadsheet Reported by|ftoth --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 8 08:38:23 -0800 2006 --- When you record changes there is no way to print them. The are only viewable on screen. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
