Re: BMC Discovery

2009-10-06 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
I have used BMC Foundation  to discover several UNIX and Linux boxes 
successfully!  Check your users Guide and note the requirement for UNIX 
systems.  If you have a specific question I would be glad to help.

Regards,
Dave Davis


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 17:13
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Discovery

** 

When you say BMC Discovery. are you talking about BMC Foundation/Topology 
Discovery? 

 

Tauf Chowdhury 

Analyst, Service Management

Office: 631.858.7765

Mobile:646.483.2779

 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Morris
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:11 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Discovery

 

** 

Are you supposed to be able to discover UNIX and Linux with BMC Discovery? 

 

In a message dated 10/5/2009 5:08:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
tauf.chowdh...@frx.com writes:

** 

How are you running the UNIX discovery? Are you using telnet or SSH? If 
you are using telnet and your UNIX admins have disabled that and only allow SSL 
connections, then you will not be able to discover those hosts. 

 

Tauf Chowdhury 

Analyst, Service Management

Office: 631.858.7765

Mobile:646.483.2779

 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Morris
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: BMC Discovery

 

** 

We are on using BMC Discovery - and we are unable to discover Linux, 
UNIX server info - such as ip address, host name,  etc.   Is anyone else able 
to discover Linux and UNIX servers using BMC Discovery Tool?

 

 

Do we have our environment configured incorrectly?

 

 

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers 
Are_ 





This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to 
the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this 
e-mail and any printout.
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers 
Are_

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 



This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to 
the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this 
e-mail and any printout.

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: BMC Discovery

2009-10-06 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Please keep in mind if you use Telnet your UNIX credentials are being sent 
unencrypted (in the clear and readable). 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 17:46
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Discovery

What version are you on? 

You should be able to see it when you set up a Discovery Task. 

So back to my original question. does your UNIX team block telnet connections 
and only allow SSH? 

 

Tauf Chowdhury 

Analyst, Service Management

Office: 631.858.7765

Mobile:646.483.2779

 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Morris
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Discovery

 

** 

Yes

 

In a message dated 10/5/2009 5:12:40 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
tauf.chowdh...@frx.com writes:

** 

When you say BMC Discovery. are you talking about BMC 
Foundation/Topology Discovery? 

 

Tauf Chowdhury 

Analyst, Service Management

Office: 631.858.7765

Mobile:646.483.2779

 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Morris
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:11 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Discovery

 

** 

Are you supposed to be able to discover UNIX and Linux with BMC 
Discovery? 

 

In a message dated 10/5/2009 5:08:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
tauf.chowdh...@frx.com writes:

** 

How are you running the UNIX discovery? Are you using telnet or 
SSH? If you are using telnet and your UNIX admins have disabled that and only 
allow SSL connections, then you will not be able to discover those hosts. 

 

Tauf Chowdhury 

Analyst, Service Management

Office: 631.858.7765

Mobile:646.483.2779

 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Morris
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: BMC Discovery

 

** 

We are on using BMC Discovery - and we are unable to discover 
Linux, UNIX server info - such as ip address, host name,  etc.   Is anyone else 
able to discover Linux and UNIX servers using BMC Discovery Tool?

 

 

Do we have our environment configured incorrectly?

 

 

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the 
Answers Are_ 





This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest 
Laboratories, Inc. proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or 
subject to copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the 
employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, 
copying or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this 
e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete 
the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the 
Answers Are_

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers 
Are_ 





This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to 
the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this 
e-mail and any printout.
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers 
Are_

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 


Re: WS to query Zip Codes given Address, City, State..

2009-09-24 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Joe,

Try this one.

http://www.ripedevelopment.com/webservices/ZipCode.asmx?WSDL\public 
 
I hope this helps!

Dave Davis


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 17:48
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: WS to query Zip Codes given Address, City, State..

**
Has anyone heard of any free (wishful thinking) and yet reliable (even more 
wishful thinking) web services for querying a zip code given the Address, City 
and State information? I probably need this as a one time query while importing 
site information. I was hoping to create a Filter to fire on MERGE to set the 
Zip Code field using the Set Fields operation from any such web-service..
 
I would prefer setting the Zip Code from the Address, City and State 
information I have rather than setting it from the data file as I have reasons 
to doubt the quality of the data that I have received as I see several 
addresses that have two completely different zip codes for the same address.. 
and they are off by not a single digit or something - way way off.. Probably a 
result of modifications done through Excel after the use of a bad bad filter..
 
The list of sites I have is only about 600, which does not really justify me 
asking for buying a web service for one time use, yet I do not see myself 
looking up each address and correcting it manually..
 
I just did a google search for the above but I cannot say I found anything 
useful.
 
Joe

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Remedy and DOD SSO

2009-08-10 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Mark,

I would also be interested in seeing your solution as well.

Thank You,
Dave 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Mark Lev
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 15:33
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Remedy and DOD SSO

** 

Abdullah,

 

How have you been?  

 

We have a CAC integration that has been implemented in DoD environments.  If 
this is something you'd like to check out, please contact me off-list.

 

Thanks,

Mark

 

Mark Lev
Director of Remedy Operations

ITIL Foundation 3 Certified

703-672-4390

703-399-6155 (cell) 

mark@rightstarsystems.com
---
RightStar Systems, Inc.
100 East Street SE, Suite 202
Vienna, VA 22180
USA
---

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Abdullah Baytops
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:59 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Remedy and DOD SSO

 

** 

Our DOD client would like for us to implement SSO using a product called 
siteminder.  Has anyone ever integrated SSO with Remedy 7.1 for a DOD client 
using this product?

 

If anyone has ever did any kind of SSO integration that would be helpful as 
well.

 

Thanks in Advance for any Response

 

V/R
Abdul Baytops
Digital Foundation Corporation
Web:  www.thedigitalcorp.com

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Dropping BMC Support

2009-07-17 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
I seem to remember something in the licensing agreement about removing 
unlicensed BMC products from your servers.  Read your license agreement.  You 
may find, as with other software vendors, that your use of the software is 
dependant upon maintaining a maintenance/support contract with the vendor.  I 
remember that we had to do some paperwork with BMC when we dropped a single 
product from our ITSM application suite and ensure that product was removed 
from the servers.  I do know that BMC requires that all of there products under 
a support contract not reside with non-supported products. 

Regards, Dave

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Richard Parker
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:06
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Dropping BMC Support

**
We are considering dropping our support contract with BMC. We've considered the 
implications of this as far tech support calls, licensing and new software 
releases.
 
Was wondering if anyone has experience with dropping support and what other 
issues might have come up besides the above mentioned items.
 
Thank you in advance.
 
Richard
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Chicago SUPER mid-west RUG

2009-01-09 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Susan,

I think that Mike is on to something.  We all use the annual UserWorld
event to network with other Remedy professionals.  This may be a prime
opportunity to boost our local User Groups and provide a cost effective
solution within our Region.

Thanks,
Dave Davis 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of michael campbell
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 17:02
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Chicago SUPER mid-west RUG

**
Susan, lets plan on maybe expanding your mid-west rug in chicago into a
couple day deal.  I think I can get RMI Solutions to do some training
and I might be able to get a couple sponsors to pay for that training. I
understand why BMC made the decision they did, but I think we can still
get alot of interest for a Green RUG meeting in Chicago this fall. Might
have to be a thursday night thru saturday venue.  I think there are
several BMC partners that will also participate and I don't think we
need to scrap this thing too fast. Even if we only get a couple hundred
folks for two days of hard Remedy knowledge transfer it would be good.
thoughts
 
Mike Campbell
Dev Technology






Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:40:47 -0600
From: Subject: Re: Other shoe just fell, no UserWorld 2009, so on with
the ARSlist Awards
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

** 

I'm disappointed, but alarmingly I also find I'm not surprised.  Since
these are my education dollars allotment I am at least thankful they are
letting us know early so that if we want to pursue another education
direction we can plan that.  Lost those dollars last year.
 
We'll have to step up our regional RUG activity.  I've already put in
motion the planning stages for one for MidWest RUG in the Chicago area.
Since 7.5 will be out in a month at least there will be something new to
talk about.
 
It's a shame that maybe the other sides of the BMC business are not
strong enough to sustain UserWorld.  It would be nice to go back to a
simpler RUG format.  Drop the bells and whistles, doesn't have to be
huge, keep it simple, go back to the old playbook!
 
Susan
 


 
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Joe DeSouza joe_rem...@yahoo.com
wrote:


** 
Exactly.. Instead of assuming that companies/customers will not
patronize the event, they could have distributed an email opinion poll
to its customers to get a feel of:
1) Whether they are willing to attend
2) Willing to attend and have the necessary financial resources
allocated by the company towards such events
3) Opinion of the customers if they decided to cancel the event
in wake of the current economic instability.
 
I would think results of such a poll might have gone a long way
in making an educated decision rather than arbitrarily canceling the
event altogether under the assumption that they won't get the mileage
they are looking for from an event such as this.. Clearly a decision
such as this is shortsightedness on part of BMC's directors or
management...
 
My 2 cents..
 
Joe




From: Rick Cook remedyr...@gmail.com
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 3:40:30 PM 

Subject: Re: Other shoe just fell, no UserWorld 2009, so on with
the ARSlist Awards


**David, 


I think the BUW as education angle was underestimated by BMC.
How can we evangelize the new BMC stuff to our own companies if we don't
get to see it and talk to the engineers?

I think this decision was hasty and shortsighted.

Rick
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry



From: Shellman, David 
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:25:32 -0500
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Other shoe just fell, no UserWorld 2009, so on with
the ARSlist Awards




Susan,
 
I was also signed up for User World 2008 and never received the
attached information concerning User World 2009.
 
Our company has cut back on a lot of things.  However training
is not one of them.  They completely understand the need to keep folks
current.  For me User World is considered as part of my training as I
have taken just about all the Remedy courses there are.
 
Dave



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:20 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Other shoe just fell, no UserWorld 2009, so on with
the ARSlist Awards


** 
FYI ... I had paid for UserWorld 2008 but I have not received
the email described below.
 
Susan


On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 

Re: ARS for non Trouble Ticketing applications

2008-11-14 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Now that's some good Friday Humor!! 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:18
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS for non Trouble Ticketing applications

I wrote a Remedy application that made my husband shovel snow back in
'03.



-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L CTR USAF AFMC 72
CS/SCBAH
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:09 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS for non Trouble Ticketing applications

I didn't do that one, I believe you or BM did :)

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell Reading
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS for non Trouble Ticketing applications

Darrell Reading Systems
What about pest control, Junior?


Darrell Reading Systems Engineer
Phone 479.204.5739
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
805 Moberly Lane, MS-0560-68
Bentonville, AR 72716
Save Money. Live Better

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L CTR USAF AFMC 72
CS/SCBAH
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:51
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS for non Trouble Ticketing applications

Sam, I've written applications that perform the following non-help desk
functionality:

Vacation tracking  approval
Knowledge base
Report Generator
Purchase Request Flow

I'm sure there are more, but you can do anything you can think of. Heck,
remedy does a lot of their support site web pages using remedy (it's
slow though, although getting better).

In addition, there are the standard Help Desk, Change Management, Asset
Management, etc that all of us have worked with.

Thanks,

Gary Opela, Jr.


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sam appecherla
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:22 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARS for non Trouble Ticketing applications

** Hi List,

Just curious to know..

Apart from using Remedy for HelpDesk, Trouble Ticketing and the kinds,
what else can we do with this workflow engine for? Does anyone have a
custom built product/application built on ARS apart from Trouble
Ticketing kinds that you would like to share?

Regards,
SriSamSri Appecherla
Mobile# +91 991 610 6008

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

-
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error destroy it immediately.
**
Wal-Mart Confidential
**



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: What's going on with TuringSMI?

2008-09-30 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
I hate to speak out of school, but BMC has changed their Support terms
for 3rd party support.  As I read it, BMC will only allow 3rd party
support if they (BMC) grant a waiver for that support to the BMC
customer.  It appears this is a new position as of the beginning of this
year and waivers are few. 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chapman, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:25
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: What's going on with TuringSMI?

**
The reason I asked is that BMC will not accept our support renewal
through TuringSMI for some reason.
 
Cheers,
 
Gary



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: 30 September 2008 14:18
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: What's going on with TuringSMI?


**
Not sure about your question.  However TuringSMI intended to purchase
EMS.  We got an email about a 2 weeks ago that the deal fell through.
 
Dave


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chapman, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:15 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: What's going on with TuringSMI?


**
Hi All,
 
Has anyone heard any rumours of a possible fallout between TuringSMI and
BMC? We're attempting to renew support but are having a few issues.
 
Cheers,
 
Gary
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the
Answers Are html___ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist:
Where the Answers Are html___ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Discovery Tools

2008-09-16 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Gordon,

We use Foundation Discovery from BMC.  It is a clientless application
that is designed to interface with CMDB and it costs about $12 per
Configuration Item (any device with an IP address).

Hope this helps,
Dave Davis

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank, Gordon M. (CMS/CTR)
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 15:35
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Discovery Tools

Hello,

What types of Discovery Tools are available to discover attributes on
Windows, UNIX and Linux client and server platforms?

I would like to fully populate a 2.1 CMDB with hardware, software,
people, processes and peripherals.

Also, is there any feel for cost per client or agent or however they
price such tools? Are there any good white papers on this?

Gordon M. Frank
Lockheed Martin


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Discovery Tools

2008-09-16 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Yes! 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank, Gordon M. (CMS/CTR)
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 7:52
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools

** 

Does BMC Discovery handle UNIX and Linux Servers? 

 

If it does handle UNIX and Linux, can you give me brief insight into how
it has to be set up?

 

My impression is that you BMC Discovery is not true discovery on UNIX
and Linux. You have to tell it everything which is not discovery as I
would define it.

 

What's happening with Blade Logic? BMC purchased this and I have heard
various good reviews. Does this take the place of BMC Discovery at some
point? 

 

David Easter are you out there?

 

Gordon M. Frank

Lockheed Martin

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly Deaver
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:53 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools

 

Ok, I have to state the obvious. If you are looking to purchase a
discovery product, wouldn't it make 

sense to buy the one that goes with your CMDB out of the box, BMC
Discovery?

 

Kelly Deaver

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(Yes, I work for BMC. This post reflects the opinions of the poster and
not the official opinion of BMC)

 

 

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools
From: Webster, Basil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, September 16, 2008 2:44 am
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

Hi Gordon,

John is quite right that those integration kits are available
for
download, free. I don't think they are supported but speak under
correction.

We looked at the Lan2CMDB as we have LanDesk as our discovery
tool. The
download basically gives you everything which is great but,
there is an
assumption that one has the LanDesk asset management module too.
The
integration reads from the tables generated by this module. I
think that
the asset management module brings the vast data base together.
For us
it got a bit tricky to explain to the business why we needed to
purchase
the asset management module on LanDesk only to use it for the
integration. Otherwise it was not required and we are wanting to
do the
asset management from the BMC CMDB.

I am only giving you a heads up so that you can make sure that
you look
into any downloads in depth and the requirements before you
thunder on
and find that it won't work for you.

Good luck.


Kind Regards,
Basil Webster
Remedy Developer

Siemens Southern Africa
IT Solutions and Services (Pty) Ltd
Infrastructure Operations
300 Janadel Avenue, Halfway House, 1685
T : +27 11 652 7523
F : +27 11 652 7501
M : +27 82 452 9389
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.siemens.co.za http://www.siemens.co.za/ 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
http://email.secureserver.net/compose.php#Compose ] On Behalf Of
Bilinski, John
Sent: 15 September 2008 21:43
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools

Here are some Discovery Tools that I know for a fact that you
can
download the Open-Source Integration projects from the
Developers
network to integrate one of these discovery tools below with
CMDB 2.1:

- LANDesk
- Microsoft SMS
- HP Open View 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
http://email.secureserver.net/compose.php#Compose ] On Behalf Of
Frank, Gordon M. (CMS/CTR)
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 3:35 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Discovery Tools

Hello,

What types of Discovery Tools are available to discover
attributes on
Windows, UNIX and Linux client and server platforms?

I would like to fully populate a 2.1 CMDB with hardware,
software,
people, processes and peripherals.

Also, is there any feel for cost per client or agent or however
they
price such tools? Are there any good white papers on this?

Gordon M. Frank
Lockheed Martin



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
http://www.arslist.org/ 
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com http://www.rmsportal.com/
ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



 

Re: Discovery Tools

2008-09-16 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Foundation Discovery will identify hardware (processer, memory, cpu,
serial number) mounted Volumes  their size, Operating system and other
data.

If you would like to this discuss further contact me off-list,
David Davis


David J. Davis
SAIC
Senior Software Systems Engineer
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter
Code 0552, Bldg. 3173
300 Highway 361
Crane, IN  47522-5001
Ph:  812.854.2150 
DSN: 482-2150
Fax:  812.854.3385
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank, Gordon M. (CMS/CTR)
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 7:52
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools

** 

Does BMC Discovery handle UNIX and Linux Servers? 

 

If it does handle UNIX and Linux, can you give me brief insight into how
it has to be set up?

 

My impression is that you BMC Discovery is not true discovery on UNIX
and Linux. You have to tell it everything which is not discovery as I
would define it.

 

What's happening with Blade Logic? BMC purchased this and I have heard
various good reviews. Does this take the place of BMC Discovery at some
point? 

 

David Easter are you out there?

 

Gordon M. Frank

Lockheed Martin

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly Deaver
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:53 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools

 

Ok, I have to state the obvious. If you are looking to purchase a
discovery product, wouldn't it make 

sense to buy the one that goes with your CMDB out of the box, BMC
Discovery?

 

Kelly Deaver

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(Yes, I work for BMC. This post reflects the opinions of the poster and
not the official opinion of BMC)

 

 

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools
From: Webster, Basil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, September 16, 2008 2:44 am
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

Hi Gordon,

John is quite right that those integration kits are available
for
download, free. I don't think they are supported but speak under
correction.

We looked at the Lan2CMDB as we have LanDesk as our discovery
tool. The
download basically gives you everything which is great but,
there is an
assumption that one has the LanDesk asset management module too.
The
integration reads from the tables generated by this module. I
think that
the asset management module brings the vast data base together.
For us
it got a bit tricky to explain to the business why we needed to
purchase
the asset management module on LanDesk only to use it for the
integration. Otherwise it was not required and we are wanting to
do the
asset management from the BMC CMDB.

I am only giving you a heads up so that you can make sure that
you look
into any downloads in depth and the requirements before you
thunder on
and find that it won't work for you.

Good luck.


Kind Regards,
Basil Webster
Remedy Developer

Siemens Southern Africa
IT Solutions and Services (Pty) Ltd
Infrastructure Operations
300 Janadel Avenue, Halfway House, 1685
T : +27 11 652 7523
F : +27 11 652 7501
M : +27 82 452 9389
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.siemens.co.za http://www.siemens.co.za/ 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
http://email.secureserver.net/compose.php#Compose ] On Behalf Of
Bilinski, John
Sent: 15 September 2008 21:43
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Discovery Tools

Here are some Discovery Tools that I know for a fact that you
can
download the Open-Source Integration projects from the
Developers
network to integrate one of these discovery tools below with
CMDB 2.1:

- LANDesk
- Microsoft SMS
- HP Open View 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
http://email.secureserver.net/compose.php#Compose ] On Behalf Of
Frank, Gordon M. (CMS/CTR)
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 3:35 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Discovery Tools

Hello,

What types of Discovery Tools are available to discover
attributes on
Windows, UNIX and Linux client and server platforms?

I would like to fully populate a 2.1 CMDB with hardware,
software,
people, processes and peripherals.

Also, is there any feel for cost per client or agent or however

Re: Hot Backup Servers

2008-07-30 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Ben,

We are using Hot Backup licenses for our Active - Passive Remedy
Cluster.  We are running Windows 2003 and have a MS Cluster of two
servers running Remedy on a virtual node. We have the Hot Backup Lic.
assigned to the passive server when the active server failover the
passive server utilizes the Hot Backup Lic. When the Production server
is restored or errors are cleared we switch back to our production
licenses.  The two servers share the same MS SQL database.

Hope this helps,
Dave

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drake
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:13
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Hot Backup Servers

**
Couldn't you get a hot backup license for the server, and put it in the
db?  It'd be there not in use until it was needed after a failover.
 
Otherwise you might have to make applying the license part of the
failover procedure.
 
-d


On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Benjamin Trimmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


** 
Who has implemented a hotbackup server in a 7.x environment?  In
6.3 and prior, it was relatively simple (license-wise) since the
licenses were in a file, and not the database.  How does, or what is the
best way, it should work in a 7 environment since the licenses are not
in the database?  We thought of having a seperate standby database
instance that would get updated via a SQL transaction log.  The problem,
however, is that if the PRD system went down, we'd have to do something
with the license to get it to work. 

Thoughts?  Ideas? 

Thanks, 
Ben Trimmer 



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IMPORTANT
NOTICE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 



Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from the nature of the
transmittal, the information contained in this email message is
CONFIDENTIAL information intended for the use of the individual or
entity named herein. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify
the sender using the above contact information or by return email and
delete this message and any copies from your computer system. Thank you.


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com
http://www.rmsportal.com/  ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ 


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Syncing two forms in two different servers for failover

2008-07-30 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Distributive Server Option (DSO) is your Firewalls allow it. 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ravi
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:51
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Syncing two forms in two different servers for failover

Hi: I have one remedy server in production and another as a cold stanby
in a different location. I have the same form in both servers. Is there
anyway to keep the data on this form in the two server identical
including the REQUEST_ID for the form? Maybe synced up to the last hour
? Can I just copy the data in T, H and B tables every hour from the
production to the standby server maybe once every hour.

Thanks
Ravi


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Buy vs. Build

2008-07-25 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
When you look at BMC User World Sessions schedule this year, it is
pretty obvious what the direction of ARS is as far as BMC Software is
concerned. No mention of the ARS product only OOTB products listed.

I was planning to go but NOW I don't see the value in going and am
finding it VERY hard to justify the trip to management.

Regards,
Dave Davis

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Richter
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 16:40
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

**
This is starting to sound like what we were talking about in 2001 and
2002, the end of Remedy as we know it.
 
hbr

 
On 7/24/08, Susan Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

** 
Riley,
 
Are you a Remedy developer?  
 
Susan

 
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Riley, Russel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Why buy AR Server for 25k when you can get a Visual
Studio Express edition, and SQL Server Express and make better apps?
For Free or at least not for 25k?

Who uses Access anymore nowadays?




-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

That initially means laying off and then eventually
hiring people.
This has some implications in terms of active
development in the
product lines and other things.  Also, Microsoft has
deep pockets.

http://www.gengaming.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=608mode=threaded

Can BMC weather the storm?  Is bankruptcy an option?

Seems like Microsoft got into some hot water over its
licensing
practices.  Is this a healthy image or a good place to
be in?
http://www.aaxnet.com/topics/slicense.html

Seems like there were problems as well:

http://news.cnet.com/Vista-views-Microsofts-license-changes/2009-1016_3-
6126885.html

Not advocating anything, just running the cards of the
unspoken sides.
 Much of everything is in a trap, to varying degrees,
just trying to
drop all premonitions and have an open view of all
sides.

Axton Grams

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF
96 CS/SCCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, of course.  I already have considered existing
forces.

 Think about it: BMC experiences a drop in revenue from
support and a
 drop in revenue in licensing initially.  It then
rebounds by VOLUME
 sales of the ARS as a RAD toolset.

 Think about it: MICROSOFT DOES IT! Buy a copy of
Visual Studio and it
 comes with a license key in the manual.  You can't
install the software
 without the license key.  Bingo! Licensing problem
(mostly) solved.

 Ever watch Gordon Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares? Last
night's episode is a
 perfect example.  Gordon shows up to a restaurant that
does *some*
 business but is, by no means, a booming business.
Gordon tells the
 owner, You need to completely revamp your menu. The
owner resists.
 No, he says, I don't want to lose my EXISTING
customer base by
 changing. Gordon says, Well then you'll never be
successful.

 The moral of the story? Oftentimes you have to
jettison an existing
 mildly profitable (but declining) business model and
swallow some losses
 in order to go on to big time success.

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com
http://www.rmsportal.com/  ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ 




--
Howard Richter
Red Hat Certified Technician
CompTIA Linux+ Certified
ITIL Foundation Certified
E-Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LinkedIn Profile = http://www.linkedin.com/in/hbr4270 __Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are html___ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Buy vs. Build

2008-07-22 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
If your customer is willing to conform to the processes established
within the ITSM 7.0 framework with very MINIMUM customization Buy! If
not Build!  Your project is doomed to fail if you try to take the OOTB
applications and customize them to meet your customers unique
requirements.  I know this from experience.  It is not pretty!
 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tanner, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 15:37
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

Another great reason for the Custom applications, I have hundreds of
users with only an AR User license - No Application licenses needed

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CS/SCCE
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:32 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

Yes...it is an awesome RAD environment but it's extremely hampered by
its extraordinarily expensive licensing model.  With another RAD (let's
say Visual Studio .Net), you build the application and then never have
to worry about paying a dime for application licenses.  With Remedy you
say, Hey, we could knock out XYZ app in a day! Oh...wait...we'd have to
buy more licenses...nevermind...

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elry
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

I have to say...

There is nothing wrong with the ITSM Suite 7.x.  It fits nicely into the
ITIL Framework that a lot of companies crave.  But, there are lot of
companies that realize that they can't run their business efficiently
inside the Framework; therefore, custom build or find another product.
Luckily, these companies are beginning to realize that ARS is a great
RAD Tool with it's own IDE  integration plugins that make many other
types of development pale by comparison...
They are also finding out that the other ITIL based products out there
are not as easily customizable, nor do they integrate well...

In any event custom development will allow most companies to nail
there processes then put a tool around it rather than tyring to push a
square peg through a round hole...


On Jul 22, 11:40 am, Tanner, Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Ray,

 Can you make your font just a little smaller :-)

 Old school custom builder - Your Business - Your Way

 I do believe for many reasons there are higher demands for custom 
 applications versus ITSM 7.X (It Takes So Much)

 Great tool, make it dance, - I am a firm Believer in Remedy - Drive
it
 with Data (as presented at past National RUG)

 But

 Do not want to be just a data administrator, Remedy is the most
powerful
 Workflow Toolkit available - USE IT !

 Doug Tanner

 RSP (Former RAC)

 Visionary of Rem-Mail

 

 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Gellenbeck
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:48 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Buy vs. Build

 Am I the only one seeing a resurgance of contacts seeking experienced 
 custom-build expertise vs. install/configure/maintain/integrate folks?

 I know BMC's pie in the sky goal is minimal need for customizations
vs.
 configuration/data changes, but there seems to be a growing backlash 
 against this McDonald's approach.  I'm only asking this of the group
to
 see if this trend is bigger than my areas of engagement over the last 
 couple years.

 Sure, there will always be needs for folks to step in an make 
 customizations here and there, but I'm suprised now at the number and 
 the scope of custom-build-from-scratch projects I'm getting 
 proposals/recruiters for compared to the past.  Has ITSM mis-stepped
in
 its later releases or is it that the customer growth for the engine
and
 those upgrading has somewhat de-coupled from ITSM along the way?  Have

 that many old-school custom-builders disappeared?

 Send me your thoughts directly if you feel the board wanting to stay 
 focused on troubleshooting threads...

 Ray Gellenbeck

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 __Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: Where the Answers Are
 html___

 DISCLAIMER Important! This message is intended for the above named
person(s) only and is CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please
immediately notify the sender by return email and then delete it from
your mailbox. This message may be protected by the attorney-client
privilege and/or work product doctrine.  Accessing, copying,
disseminating or re-using any of the information contained in this
e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. Finally, you should check this email and any attachments for
the presence of viruses, as the sender accepts no liability for any
damage 

Re: Buy vs. Build

2008-07-22 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
All Microsoft users must be covered by a CAL license of some type either
Server license and/or Database license. 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CS/SCCE
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 15:41
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

Right...you avoid the ridiculous (my opinion) costs associated with
ITSM, but you still have to pay for AR System user licenses.

With VS .Net, Delphi, or whatever you NEVER worry about user licenses
for apps you build.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Begosh, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

Yeah but if you custom build your application you do not need all of
the licenses for instance like ITSM 7 needs, Problem, change, asset,
incident etc... 


Kevin Begosh, RSP
External Initiatives
System Design  Integration
301-791-3540 Phone
410-422-3623 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CS/SCCE
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:32 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

Yes...it is an awesome RAD environment but it's extremely hampered by
its extraordinarily expensive licensing model.  With another RAD (let's
say Visual Studio .Net), you build the application and then never have
to worry about paying a dime for application licenses.  With Remedy you
say, Hey, we could knock out XYZ app in a day! Oh...wait...we'd have to
buy more licenses...nevermind...

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elry
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Buy vs. Build

I have to say...

There is nothing wrong with the ITSM Suite 7.x.  It fits nicely into the
ITIL Framework that a lot of companies crave.  But, there are lot of
companies that realize that they can't run their business efficiently
inside the Framework; therefore, custom build or find another product.
Luckily, these companies are beginning to realize that ARS is a great
RAD Tool with it's own IDE  integration plugins that make many other
types of development pale by comparison...
They are also finding out that the other ITIL based products out there
are not as easily customizable, nor do they integrate well...

In any event custom development will allow most companies to nail
there processes then put a tool around it rather than tyring to push a
square peg through a round hole...


On Jul 22, 11:40 am, Tanner, Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Ray,

 Can you make your font just a little smaller :-)

 Old school custom builder - Your Business - Your Way

 I do believe for many reasons there are higher demands for custom 
 applications versus ITSM 7.X (It Takes So Much)

 Great tool, make it dance, - I am a firm Believer in Remedy - Drive
it
 with Data (as presented at past National RUG)

 But

 Do not want to be just a data administrator, Remedy is the most
powerful
 Workflow Toolkit available - USE IT !

 Doug Tanner

 RSP (Former RAC)

 Visionary of Rem-Mail

 

 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Gellenbeck
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:48 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Buy vs. Build

 Am I the only one seeing a resurgance of contacts seeking experienced 
 custom-build expertise vs. install/configure/maintain/integrate folks?

 I know BMC's pie in the sky goal is minimal need for customizations
vs.
 configuration/data changes, but there seems to be a growing backlash 
 against this McDonald's approach.  I'm only asking this of the group
to
 see if this trend is bigger than my areas of engagement over the last 
 couple years.

 Sure, there will always be needs for folks to step in an make 
 customizations here and there, but I'm suprised now at the number and 
 the scope of custom-build-from-scratch projects I'm getting 
 proposals/recruiters for compared to the past.  Has ITSM mis-stepped
in
 its later releases or is it that the customer growth for the engine
and
 those upgrading has somewhat de-coupled from ITSM along the way?  Have

 that many old-school custom-builders disappeared?

 Send me your thoughts directly if you feel the board wanting to stay 
 focused on troubleshooting threads...

 Ray Gellenbeck

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 __Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: Where the Answers Are
 html___

 DISCLAIMER Important! This message is intended for the above named
person(s) only and is CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please
immediately notify the sender by return email and then delete it from
your mailbox. This message 

CMDB Upgrade Errors from Version 1.1 Patch 3 to Version 2.1

2008-03-25 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
After upgrading CMDB1.1 Patch 3 using BMC's Upgrade tool,  all CI
relationships were dropped within Asset Management.  A review of the
forms showed that all of the child CI data was migrated;  however, all
relationships were lost.  The Systemname was blank on all forms
including AST:ComputerSystem.

Has anyone experienced to incident and if so, how  were the
relationships restored?

Thank You,
Dave


David J. Davis
SAIC
Senior Software Systems Engineer
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter
Code 0552, Bldg. 3173
300 Highway 361
Crane, IN  47522-5001
Ph:  812.854.2150 
DSN: 482-2150
Fax:  812.854.3385
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crane.navy.mil/custfeedback
 Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552.vcf 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Davis;David
FN:Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
ORG:USN Contractor;SAIC
TITLE:CONT
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(812) 854-2150
TEL;HOME;VOICE:(812) 847-7204
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(812) 384-6456
ADR;WORK:;Bld 3173, Code 0552;300 Highway 361;Crane;IN;47522-5000;UNITED STATES
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Bld 3173, Code 0552=0D=0A300 Highway 361=0D=0ACrane, IN 47522-5000=0D=0AUNIT=
ED STATES
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20061011T155306Z
END:VCARD


Re: How to get the form and field names?

2007-09-21 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Matt,

Is this available as a developer Download or are you share the DEF file?

Thank You,
Dave Davis
 


David J. Davis
SAIC
Senior Software Systems Engineer
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter
Code 0552, Bldg. 3173
300 Highway 361
Crane, IN  47522-5001
Ph:  812.854.2150 
DSN: 482-2150
Fax:  812.854.3385
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crane.navy.mil/custfeedback

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 8:37
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: How to get the form and field names?

Mark,

I have actually took the time to build an ARS form (not a view form) to
hold this data. I then built a Admin-Control Panel to loop over the
data and populate it. Yes, this means it is cached data that can become
out of sync with the real meta-data that the ARS server uses.
(but it is a simple check box to re sync them for me.)


The advantages are:
  You have a totally portable ARS application to solve the problem
  You do not have to know much about the DB structures to put it
together
  You could even run a nightly escalation to keep the data synced every
24 hours. (or just do it after any production change.)
  You do not have to figure out something that would work for a
Request ID value.
  You can use this data to detect changes down to the field level and
ask for documentation from developers for all changes. :)

Disadvantages:
  Can be out of sync with reality
  Takes a bit of development work to put together (with some SQL in
there too)

HTH.

--
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.


On 9/21/07, L. J. Head [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I created a view in the Db with this sql

 CREATE VIEW dbo.ExistingFields
 AS
 SELECT CAST(RTRIM(CAST(f.schemaId AS char)) + '' +
 RTRIM(CAST(RIGHT(f.fieldId, 6) AS char)) AS int) AS RequestID, a.name 
 AS Form, a.schemaId AS FormID,
   f.fieldName, f.fieldId, f.fieldType, f.datatype,

 f.fOption, f.createMode, f.defaultValue
 FROM dbo.arschema a INNER JOIN
   dbo.field f ON a.schemaId = f.schemaId

 I then imported this view form on top of it.  This allows me to lookup

 fields and field ID's by form name or ID along with some basic 
 attributes about them...all of the cast for the request ID field is an

 attempt to make a 15 char unique ID for the request ID.  Hope it's 
 helpful to you


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where
the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Davis;David
FN:Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
ORG:USN Contractor;SAIC
TITLE:CONT
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(812) 854-2150
TEL;HOME;VOICE:(812) 847-7204
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(812) 384-6456
ADR;WORK:;Bld 3173, Code 0552;300 Highway 361;Crane;IN;47522-5000;UNITED STATES
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Bld 3173, Code 0552=0D=0A300 Highway 361=0D=0ACrane, IN 47522-5000=0D=0AUNIT=
ED STATES
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20061011T155306Z
END:VCARD


Re: Importing into Remedy

2007-08-13 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Steve,

I would also like the command line as well if it is not too much
trouble.

Thank You,
Dave Davis
 


David J. Davis
SAIC
Senior Software Systems Engineer
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter
Code 0552, Bldg. 3173
300 Highway 361
Crane, IN  47522-5001
Ph:  812.854.2150 
DSN: 482-2150
Fax:  812.854.3385
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crane.navy.mil/custfeedback

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Pataray
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 20:05
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Importing into Remedy

I emailed Candace directly and she provided me with her command line she
was using. I noticed one parameter which I was not using the -l for
logfile. I used it and it told me that my mapping file had an invalid
field reference.

One I fixe the mapping I was able to run the I emailed Candace directly
and she provided me with her command line she was using. I noticed one
parameter which I was not using the -l for logfile. I used it and it
told me that my mapping file had an invalid field reference. Now I'm
back in business.

Thank you all!

Steve


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where
the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Davis;David
FN:Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
ORG:USN Contractor;SAIC
TITLE:CONT
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(812) 854-2150
TEL;HOME;VOICE:(812) 847-7204
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(812) 384-6456
ADR;WORK:;Bld 3173, Code 0552;300 Highway 361;Crane;IN;47522-5000;UNITED STATES
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Bld 3173, Code 0552=0D=0A300 Highway 361=0D=0ACrane, IN 47522-5000=0D=0AUNIT=
ED STATES
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20061011T155306Z
END:VCARD


Re: ARS Report Creator's time problem on queries

2007-04-03 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Mark and Kelly,

We are experiencing the same problem with our installation of Remedy ARS
6.3 running MidTeir 6.3.  Our database is SQL2000.  The only difference
is that we are showing a 5 hour discrepancy.  This is explainable due to
the fact that our Remedy server is running in the Central Standard Time.

We have a BMC Support ticket on this problem and BMC Support stated it
was unlikely that it would be fixed in Version 6.3 and suggested that we
upgrade to MidTier 7.0.1.  As you mentioned before, this problem only
effects users running reports from the MidTier that are in different
time zones (e.g. User in EST while server is in CST).  What time zones
are your users and MidTier in? Our problem occurs while our users are in
EST and our MidTier is in CST.

Thank You for Your Posting,
Dave Davis 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly Heikkila
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 11:33
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Report Creator's time problem on queries

We have the same issue when running reports.  This started happening at
a client site after the time zone patch was installed (we believe--or
agents were paying more attention, as you mentioned).  This has not yet
been resolved that I am aware of.

ARS 6.3
Oracle

Kelly Heikkila
Kinetic Data

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:42 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Cc: Whilden, Mark D.
Subject: ARS Report Creator's time problem on queries


Listers,
After we applied the Daylight Saving time patches, we started to pay
more attention to time zone issues.  Note, I don't think the DST patch
caused this, but caused us to look into time fields more closely.  We
found that for report run from Report Creator form, any queries against
date fields weren't adjusted for difference between our zone (EST) and
GMT.  The Report Creator form is used for running Crystal Reports within
ARS, or running ARS reports and Crystal Reports thru the MidTier.
Whither we ran Crystal Reports or ARS reports from the web, or Crystal
Reports from the client; we got the same results.  If I ran the same
query in User tool the query ran correctly.  All the tools display the
dates correctly in the reports or on the forms.

To investigate this, I turned on SQL logging and repeated the same
queries from the Report Creator and from User search.  The Select
statements vary within the where clause in the constant used against the
date column.  The difference is 14400 seconds or 4 hours.  That is the
difference between us and GMT.

Our systems people are looking into time zone on the server, but I am
doubtful this is the problem.  However, I don't have a good culprit to
pursue.  Anyone seen this before or have a clue as to where to look to
resolve this.

Mark Whilden
MITRE Corp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(571)252-4023


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where
the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where
the Answers Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ARS as a development system

2006-10-22 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Well Bruce, here is a real stretch concerning Remedy as a development
tool.  How about as a Rapid Development Environment (RDE). Remedy has a
lot of the same benefits for rapid development as does MS Access with
one better Remedy can create  SQL and/or Oracle Data Tables. 

In truth we use Remedy for all types of applications that require track
of actions or tasks.  If we want to email notifications and we need
escalations to keep track of a particular action items; we use Remedy
Action Request System.

Remedy has limitations such as document management and complex
mathematics functions but all in all we use it to create  applications
requiring a quite turn-around.



-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hendershot,Bruce D.
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:59
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS as a development system

I'm resurrecting a topic from several months ago concerning using ARS as
a development environment.  Over the past 10 years we've used it to
build our IT service management tools but also several non IT Service
Management applications, some of which were built solely for the
business as opposed to being IT internal tools.  We'd like to do more of
this because we can develop the applications quickly and inexpensively,
as opposed to using .Net technologies for example.  We would limit it to
being used for specific types of applications based on guidelines.

The major concern among our IT strategists is that BMC doesn't
officially recognize, or at least market it as a general development
tool.  Another issue is that we have other systems that have workflow
components to them such as SharePoint and SAP.

I'm interesting in knowing how many shops are using the AR System as a
general development tool.  If you've gone through the same decision
process, what was the result and what were the key drivers that led you
to that decision?

Thanks.

Bruce Hendershot
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:13 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS as a development system

As soon as I saw ITSM 7, I knew that's the direction they were taking.
ITSM 4-6 has been around for long enough that there are lots of people
who know the app well enough to customize it.  This version is not only
new to us all, but is bigger.  That gives BMC's own P.S. people a leg up
on it over partners and in-house developers, especially since training
won't be available until late September-ish, which means that for all
practical purposes, the expertise won't be widespread until 2007.

BMC is basing its business (and therefore sales) model on ITIL buy-in
from the customer base.  ITSM will get a customer to ITIL compliance far
faster than a custom app set would, even if the developers were
ITIL-trained.  ITIL also works better in an integrated platform
solution, which means more product sales.  It's not like we can go out
and build a discovery platform in ARS.  We'd be hard-pressed to build
ITSM 7 ourselves, which is not something we'd say about previous
versions.

So the decision point that some customers are at right now is whether
ITIL is a standard that they will embrace now, or put off until later,
or until something better comes along.  ARS custom development will be a
very strong alternative in those non-ITIL shops.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Powell
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:24 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS as a development system

Around two years ago now, I saw a shift in the Remedy/BMC sales staff
who went from being very supportive of our custom ARS apps to suddenly
start asking when are you going to switch over to ITSM?  They seemed
to have a list of talking points of why it would be better to use
ITSM.  It made sense to me that as a BMC/Remedy sales person you would
encourage your customers to buy the app licenses on top of the ARS
licenses because that was more $$ in the pocket, but I hoped it wasn't a
true shift in the positioning of the ARS product line.

Now that we are seeing RUG/BUG once again be very short on development
topics, maybe there really is a shift within BMC/Remedy to push
customers away from custom apps in ARS and onto ITSM.  Of course they
have always wanted us to buy the apps, but maybe this is a more
conscientious shift in the positioning of the product.

The release of ARS 7.0 was big news to us who follow it, but it didn't
appear to me to be big news on the Remedy or BMC corporate websites
(except the support site).  The ITSM releases are touted.  Even when you
click through the websites for the BSM product line, you get to ITSM
info fairly easily, but you have to dig deep to get to pure ARS details.
In the old Remedy Corporation days, 

Re: Client Application SSO (U)

2006-10-18 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Title: RE: Client Application SSO (U)
**



James,

I 
don't have time right now (workload and all) but I feel DoD as a community 
should be seriously lookingto developRUG due to our common interests 
and concerns.

Dave 
Davis
SAIC


From: Action Request System discussion 
list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J 
C-E LCMC HQISEC/L3Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 
16:43To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGSubject: Re: Client 
Application SSO (U)
** 

Dave:  Not 
that I know of. I could check with the folks at the Army Knowledge On-Line 
to see if there is an Army group.  
You wanna be the 'boss'?  
James McKenzie L-3 GSI  
 
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of 
Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:41 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Client 
Application SSO (U) 
** Hello James,  Since you mentioned it, DoD, is there a 
DoD-wide user's group out there and If not who is interested in creating 
one?  Later, 
Dave Davis  
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in 
it___
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___


Re: DOD Remedy User's Group (formerly SSO)

2006-10-18 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Title: RE: DOD Remedy User's Group (formerly SSO)
**



Sorry 
Thad,

Big 
Government is already here I afraid.

Later,
Dave



From: Action Request System discussion 
list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J 
C-E LCMC HQISEC/L3Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 
16:58To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGSubject: Re: DOD Remedy User's 
Group (formerly SSO)
** 

Scott: 
Thank you. 
James McKenzie L-3 GSI Innovative Solutions - Extraordinary Results! 
-Original Message- From: Action 
Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 
2006 2:56 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: OT:DOD Remedy User's Group (formerly SSO) 
All, I think this thread needs a subject 
change. There, it's changed. 
Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC 

Original Message: - From: McKenzie, James J C-E 
LCMC HQISEC/L3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 18 
Oct 2006 14:48:27 -0700 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
Subject: Re: Client Application SSO (U) 
Sandra:  I 
know there is a lot of Remedy usage throughout the DoD and not just as a Trouble 
Management System.  I think that 'we' need a RUG specific to the DoD audience where we can 
discuss issues specific to the use of Remedy ARS within our 
community.
 James McKenzie L-3 GSI  
 
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of 
Hennigan, Sandra H CTR OSD-CIO
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:46 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Client 
Application SSO (U) 
** UNCLASSIFIED  I've been working to get one going here at 
the Pentagon user's group; not DoD wide but a start. Remedy is VERY 
interested and has been a lot of help.
 
Sandra Hennigan 
OSD Remedy Administrator 
Office # 703-602-2525 x251 
CACI - Ever Vigilant(tm) 
 
Apparently, there is nothing that cannot happen today. 
Mark Twain 
 -Original 
Message-  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of 
McKenzie, James J C-E LCMC
HQISEC/L3  
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 5:43 PM 
 To: 
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG  Subject: Re: Client Application SSO (U) 
 
 
 ** 
 Dave: 
  
 Not that I 
know of. I could check with the folks at the Army Knowledge On-Line to see 
if there is an Army group. 
  
 You wanna be 
the 'boss'?James McKenzie  
L-3 GSI   
  
 From: Action Request 
System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of 
Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
 Sent: Wednesday, 
October 18, 2006 2:41 PM  
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
 Subject: Re: 
Client Application SSO (U) 
 ** 
 Hello James, 
  
 Since you 
mentioned it, DoD, is there a DoD-wide user's group out there and If not who is 
interested in creating one? 
  
 Later, 
 Dave 
Davis 
 
___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist 
Archives at http://www.wwrug.org 
 
mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . 
___ 
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org 
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in 
it___
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___


Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a smar t card

2006-10-10 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Hello Carolyn,

What we have done at our activity is to tie the CAC PKI SmartCard to the
Active Directory and assign AD users to a Remedy Group.  That group has
permissions to the Virtual Website that hosts the Remedy MidTier.  Much
like your Trust comment below.  Additionally, we redirect any user
that attempts to access Remedy MidTier to a registration page that
collects their CAC data to create an AD account.  Once their request is
approved their AD account is added to the Remedy group.  It is not where
we want to be but we have our Remedy MidTier and Production servers on
separate AD Domains.

Thank You for your feedback,
Dave Davis


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wixson Carolyn L PSNS
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 10:07
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a
smar t card

Hi!

Here is what we plan on doing so far, only on the mid-tier (6.3):

All of our users are authenticated, so we provide a link for Requesters
to a JSP page that gets the user name and logs them in with it.

Once they are in, an Active link runs a process that calls another JSP
page to get the Windows user name again and compares it to the $USER$.
(This is to ensure that someone does not work-around the auto-login
page.) Both of these JSP pages are based from KM-00010678 How can I
use my NT domain name to log me directly into the Mid-Tier without
having to be directed to login.jsp? 

There are other Active links that run to ensure that the login meets
other criteria as well.

This will work if everyone is authenticated, but as you said, it does
not check the certificate. 

On the windows client, it is pretty much available to just Customer
Support and they login. If a user does access the windows client, there
are some Active Links that limit the use, etc.

I am looking at other solutions, but I believe that the above will work
for now. We have not moved this to production yet. We have never used
the Mid-Tier before, but now that we are going to allow requesters to
submit their own tickets, it seems a good way to go.

I hope this helps.

Carolyn Wixson



-Original Message-
From: Rebecca Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:46
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a
smart card


Nothing, yet.  Based on research, seems that it can't be done - you can
set up a trust (which our security people get indignant at calling it
that) - meaning, if you want to trust that just because someone got on
to a machine with a smart card, you could grab the user name get them
into the system that way.  But you can't have the AR Server and the
client communicate with certificates.

However, on the mid-tier, we can use certificates, as we'll do all of
the authentication work using SiteMinder...

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davis, David CTR
NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 1:24 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a
smart card

Rebecca

Have you been able to integrated ARS authentication with the PKI
SmartCard yet?  If so, what tools did you use.

Thanks,
Dave Davis
Software Systems Engineer - SAIC
 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rebecca Hammond
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 13:39
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a
smart card

Am I the only one who isn't totally confused by the white paper?  I'm
just not clear on how I'm supposed to write an Authenticator of my own,
that handles PKI or SmartCard technology.

Is it just because with SSO, it pulls the information from your OS?

Does anyone have any samples of what these Authenticators might look
like?

Thanks in advance!

-Rebecca Hammond

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:11:45 -0700, Easter, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Daniel,

  You may want to take a look at the Integrating BMC Remedy Action 
Request System with Single Sign-On (SSO) white paper that was updated 
for AR System 7.00.00.  It also applies to other client-side login 
intercept technologies like smart cards or PKI.

It is available on http://supportweb.remedy.com in the Documents 
section.

David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager - BMC Software

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CONDREA, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:53 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a smart

card

Hi All,

Can anybody suggest a way to authenticate an ARS user using a 
certificate stored on a smart card?

The end user can not authenticate with a username

Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a smar t card

2006-10-10 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
The redirect is handle by the 401 Errors.  If you are not in the group
hence 401 on the website.  Once redirected you must have CAC and a
reason to register.  Registration info and harvested data is used to
create the AD account.  What I am looking for is a more direct approach
within ARS itself.

Thanks,
Dave
 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:34
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a
smar t card

This is interesting.. sounds a little like the AF Portal..
The problem with AF Portal is the Embedded password into the scripting..
This is a little on the 2 taco's shy of a combination plate aspect..
But it souds like you are not doing that..
interesting.. is this in JSP ? the redirector and then into remedy..

would like to see that if possible..

MSgt Patrick Zandi, USAF

On 10/10/06, Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello Carolyn,

 What we have done at our activity is to tie the CAC PKI SmartCard to 
 the Active Directory and assign AD users to a Remedy Group.  That 
 group has permissions to the Virtual Website that hosts the Remedy 
 MidTier.  Much like your Trust comment below.  Additionally, we 
 redirect any user that attempts to access Remedy MidTier to a 
 registration page that collects their CAC data to create an AD 
 account.  Once their request is approved their AD account is added to 
 the Remedy group.  It is not where we want to be but we have our 
 Remedy MidTier and Production servers on separate AD Domains.

 Thank You for your feedback,
 Dave Davis


 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wixson Carolyn L PSNS
 Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 10:07
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a 
 smar t card

 Hi!

 Here is what we plan on doing so far, only on the mid-tier (6.3):

 All of our users are authenticated, so we provide a link for 
 Requesters to a JSP page that gets the user name and logs them in with
it.

 Once they are in, an Active link runs a process that calls another JSP

 page to get the Windows user name again and compares it to the $USER$.
 (This is to ensure that someone does not work-around the auto-login
 page.) Both of these JSP pages are based from KM-00010678 How can

 I use my NT domain name to log me directly into the Mid-Tier without 
 having to be directed to login.jsp?

 There are other Active links that run to ensure that the login meets 
 other criteria as well.

 This will work if everyone is authenticated, but as you said, it does 
 not check the certificate.

 On the windows client, it is pretty much available to just Customer 
 Support and they login. If a user does access the windows client, 
 there are some Active Links that limit the use, etc.

 I am looking at other solutions, but I believe that the above will 
 work for now. We have not moved this to production yet. We have never 
 used the Mid-Tier before, but now that we are going to allow 
 requesters to submit their own tickets, it seems a good way to go.

 I hope this helps.

 Carolyn Wixson



 -Original Message-
 From: Rebecca Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:46
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a 
 smart card


 Nothing, yet.  Based on research, seems that it can't be done - you 
 can set up a trust (which our security people get indignant at 
 calling it
 that) - meaning, if you want to trust that just because someone got 
 on to a machine with a smart card, you could grab the user name get 
 them into the system that way.  But you can't have the AR Server and 
 the client communicate with certificates.

 However, on the mid-tier, we can use certificates, as we'll do all of 
 the authentication work using SiteMinder...

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davis, David CTR 
 NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
 Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 1:24 PM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a 
 smart card

 Rebecca

 Have you been able to integrated ARS authentication with the PKI 
 SmartCard yet?  If so, what tools did you use.

 Thanks,
 Dave Davis
 Software Systems Engineer - SAIC


 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rebecca Hammond
 Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 13:39
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a 
 smart card

 Am I the only one who isn't totally confused by the white paper?  I'm 
 just not clear on how I'm supposed

Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a smart card

2006-10-05 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
Rebecca

Have you been able to integrated ARS authentication with the PKI
SmartCard yet?  If so, what tools did you use.

Thanks,
Dave Davis
Software Systems Engineer - SAIC
 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rebecca Hammond
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 13:39
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a
smart card

Am I the only one who isn't totally confused by the white paper?  I'm
just not clear on how I'm supposed to write an Authenticator of my own,
that handles PKI or SmartCard technology.

Is it just because with SSO, it pulls the information from your OS?

Does anyone have any samples of what these Authenticators might look
like?

Thanks in advance!

-Rebecca Hammond

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:11:45 -0700, Easter, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Daniel,

  You may want to take a look at the Integrating BMC Remedy Action 
Request System with Single Sign-On (SSO) white paper that was updated 
for AR System 7.00.00.  It also applies to other client-side login 
intercept technologies like smart cards or PKI.

It is available on http://supportweb.remedy.com in the Documents 
section.

David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager - BMC Software

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CONDREA, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:53 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Authenticate an ARS user using a certificate stored on a smart

card

Hi All,

Can anybody suggest a way to authenticate an ARS user using a 
certificate stored on a smart card?

The end user can not authenticate with a username and a password. 
He/she can only authenticate using the certificate stored in the
smartcard.

Best regards,
Daniel Condrea

--

*DISCLAIMER*

The information contained in this communication is confidential and may

be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to 
receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in

reliance of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and

may be unlawful. Orange Romania S.A. is neither liable for the proper, 
complete transmission of the information contained in this 
communication nor any delay in its receipt.

*END OF DISCLAIMER*

___
_
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

___


UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org 
===
=


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org


Re: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

2006-07-17 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
BFS Strong Password installs on the server as AR System forms.



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of James Collins
Sent: Mon 7/17/2006 4:33 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: FW: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software


** 

 

 



From: James Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 5:20 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

 

A lot of folks have helped me with getting this BFS software running on the 
development box.   I have one simple question for those who have run this,   
do you install it on the server?   or can you install it on your own 
workstation and point the AL to it which will pull it in?  sorry for the 
Remedy 101 question, but I do not have the answer!

 

Jim

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of McKenzie, James J C-E LCMC HQISEC/L3
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 4:14 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

 

James:

 

I'm wondering why the MD5 program is being run.  This creates a 'signature' for 
a file.  Thus if the file is tampered with, you will be able to tell and in 
some cases if the program is used 'creatively', can prevent running a corrupted 
or virus-infoected program.

 

James McKenzie

 

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of James Collins
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:03 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software
Importance: High

** 

 

Anyone else have similar hurdles with Strong Password  any suggestions?



From: James Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 12:32 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: FW: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

 

 

I put it on my local workstation and not on the server as that is what the bfs 
instructions suggested but perhaps it might be a better idea on the server?

 

Jim

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 5:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

 

Where is the md5 executable that it is trying to run located?  

 

If it is on the server (in C:\Program Files\AR System) then the set field 
probably should read:

 

$PROCESS$ @@:C:\Program Files\AR System\md5.exe -d$Clear Password$

 

Fred

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of James Collins
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 4:29 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

** 

Okay,  I have not received many responses but I have narrowed down the 
$Process$ that might be giving me the error ARERR [341] Cannot run the 
requested process

 

This says:  Run Process on My local work station, -d  provides the location 
indication and $Clear Password$ is the path.  I am supposed to running an 
md5.exe.  Should the exe be on the server instead?

 

 

This is how the set field is set up in the active link.:

 

$PROCESS$ C:\Program Files\AR System\md5.exe -d$Clear Password$

 



From: James Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 12:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

 

 

 



From: James Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 10:49 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: BFS Strong Password 2.5.1 - Errors when setting up software

 

To all,

 

I love the strong password workflow, real good stuff, I am having the same 
problem as peter back in Oct 2005 and was wondering if any one had a solution.  
Specifically, I am getting the following error message when trying to change a 
password:

 

ARERR [341] Cannot run the requested process

 

The preceding message occurred during the execution of active link 
BFS:USRPWD_ValidatePW14 -- action 1. (ARNOTE 1101)

 

I checked permissions all look good, nothing seems apparent.

 

I am running 6.3 without any patches installed.  Any guidance will be 
appreciated.  Happy fourth.

 

James Collins

 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org


EMP: Permanent Developer Position in Southern Indiana

2006-05-08 Thread Davis, David CTR NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 0552
**



Job Description: This position 
performs software development and support of the Remedy Action Request System. 
Specific responsibilities include design, coding, testing and implementation of 
complex processes. This requires direct interface with functional analysts and 
customers, and the ability to analyze complex information requirements and 
distill data and programming requirements. Position located at Crane. 


Education: Bachelor's Degree in 
related technical discipline or 4 years of experience in lieu of degree. 


Required Skills: The position 
requires at least two years experience with Remedy Action Request System and 
Microsoft SQL Server. Specific experience required includes developing AR System 
forms, using .Net, and Crystal Enterprise. Excellent written and oral 
communication skills are required. 

Desired Skills: Experience 
developing and presenting training is desired. At least two years of general 
software development experience is desired.

Applicant must be able to obtain a 
Secret Security Clearance

How to Apply: Apply via 
the URL below.

https://cp-its-rmprd.saic.com/MAIN/careerportal/Job_Profile.cfm?szOrderID=56028szUniqueCareerPortalID=b341ba47-6d4f-4e87-b30f-1d5a7ce248eb



__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___