Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-10 Thread Begosh, Kevin
Tim,
I will give you an account of what I have been through.  We did the same thing 
as you going from 7.0 to 7.1 and we have 6 different environments that I did 
this on.  It really depends on how you did your customizations because when a 
AL comes in from the patch it will overwrite what is OOB.  So for example if 
you took an AL that was OOB and renamed it as your own and then made your 
changes and disabled the OOB one then all the patch would do is come through 
and re-enable the OOB one.  So you would just have to disable the OOB one as 
well.  Now if you just changed the OOB AL and did not rename it then the patch 
is going to blow out your changes.  As for the forms, I was told by BMC and we 
experienced the same thing that if you  add a custom field to a OOB form and do 
not use their range then you should be fine.  We had the same experience in 
that all the fields we added where there and did not get deleted, however 
sometimes the patch does take them out of the view so change that before you 
start freaking out.  So basically what we did after the patches is went through 
and did extensive testing on what the patch changed and then when we went to 
production we had a def file of all the stuff we needed to change back.  Import 
the patch and then import the changes and we were good to go.  It was actually 
easy doing in production but that was because we did a lot of testing.  I did 
notice the most annoying thing was that the patch change permissions we added 
to OOB forms.  Like the user form.  We made it public read and every time we 
run a patch it seems like it removes that permission, but again those are the 
things we found out during testing.  All in all I do not think it was too bad 
but again that depends on your development standards and how you change OOB 
forms and workflow.  Let me know if I can be of anymore help.

Kevin Begosh, RSP
301-791-3540 Phone
410-422-3623 Cell

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rondeau
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0
Importance: High

**
Hi,

Attempting to upgrade from 7.0.1 patch 2 to 7.1 patch 7

Basically we have:

Arserver -  7.0.1 patch 2 upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Approver  - 7.0.1upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Change  - 7.0.2   upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Incident   - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Problem  - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7

So I did upgrade/patch Arserver/Approval/assignment/Change/Incident/Problem and 
my forms got overwritten and workflow I have shut off is back on.   So do I 
need to reimport my forms and workflow?

This is all on Windows 2003 running SQL 2005.

Looking for others that have upgraded ITSM module and what they have done.

Thanks

Tim
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-10 Thread strauss
We just completed patching production from ITSM 7.0.03.007 to 009 last weekend. 
 I rehearsed this on development several times, and the key is to identify all 
of the things that you will have to do afterwards on your test runs, and have 
them in a checklist with supporting def files beforehand.  It gets _much_ more 
complicated if you also have to reapply an add-on patch like 9002 (we had to) 
or 9004 afterwards (our experience with 9002 caused us to avoid 9004).  If you 
have a lot of custom fields, at a minimum they are going to get dropped off the 
updated form views and have to be added back... Migrator is THE best way to 
handle this chore, as well as any fields you moved, resized, or un-hid (we have 
some of all three on HPD:Help Desk).  You will also find it necessary to review 
all of the workflow (ALs, Filters, both kinds of Guides, even Menus) the you 
had disabled and replaced with custom objects for _changes_ made by the patch.  
I found several where I had to modify my custom objects to incorporate changes 
(new Set Field or Change Field actions, or qualifications, or mappings On Open 
or On Close) made by the patch to the OOTB object, and of course re-disable the 
OOTB object.  [example: Active Link INT:HPDTMS:INC:CreateNewTaskOpenTAS]  This 
is the other place that Migrator will help you - identifying the workflow that 
the patch has changed that might affect your customizations.

When we started testing, we were planning to add Asset Management to our 
system, which comes in at patch 003 and requires that you re-run patch 007 to 
bring it up even to the other apps (we went live on patch 007 in May 2008), 
which also reapplies 007 to your existing apps and wipes out their 
customizations.  In this scenario, I had several hours of cleanup work to do 
plus the down time of installing Asset, and when we failed to acquire Asset I 
was able to drop this requirement.  The problem is that patch 007 (and earlier) 
all may have devastating effects on your customizations since they overwrite 
some forms rather than update them, and replace a lot of form views.  They also 
replaced a number of Report records with ones that have incorrect or NULL  
Locale information - I usually have to go back and re-set them to en_US 
manually.  Patches 008 and 009 are much more benign by comparison, but they do 
include a complete re-design of the CTM:People Search form and several others 
to use external qualifications.  It is an improvement, but it forced me to 
re-develop our customizations to that module completely.

On the AR Server side, we originally rehearsed patching from ARS 7.1.00.002 to 
006, and found that the main changes that affected our customizations were to 
the Password Management subsystem.  For now I plan to leave it at 7.1.00.002 
since I _supposedly_ can upgrade directly from 7.1.00.002 to 7.5.00.001.  We'll 
see if that actually works.

If you have Remedy Knowledge Management installed (which is a completely manual 
integration), patches before 008 would damage it, and 9002 would wipe it out 
completely.  Nice to see that the BMC developers coordinated their patches so 
well with each other.

Also, remember to flush your mid-tier cache after the patching process is 
complete and force a new pre-fetch of the updated applications.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing  IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rondeau
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 5:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0
Importance: High

**
Hi,

Attempting to upgrade from 7.0.1 patch 2 to 7.1 patch 7

Basically we have:

Arserver -  7.0.1 patch 2 upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Approver  - 7.0.1upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Change  - 7.0.2   upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Incident   - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Problem  - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7

So I did upgrade/patch Arserver/Approval/assignment/Change/Incident/Problem and 
my forms got overwritten and workflow I have shut off is back on.   So do I 
need to reimport my forms and workflow?

This is all on Windows 2003 running SQL 2005.

Looking for others that have upgraded ITSM module and what they have done.

Thanks

Tim
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-10 Thread dcharters
Hire a consultant that has done it before:)




On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:55:59 -0500, strauss wrote
 We just completed patching production from ITSM 7.0.03.007 to 009 
 last weekend.  I rehearsed this on development several times, and 
 the key is to identify all of the things that you will have to do 
 afterwards on your test runs, and have them in a checklist with 
 supporting def files beforehand.  It gets _much_ more complicated if 
 you also have to reapply an add-on patch like 9002 (we had to) or 
 9004 afterwards (our experience with 9002 caused us to avoid 9004).  
 If you have a lot of custom fields, at a minimum they are going to 
 get dropped off the updated form views and have to be added back... 
 Migrator is THE best way to handle this chore, as well as any fields 
 you moved, resized, or un-hid (we have some of all three on HPD:Help 
 Desk).  You will also find it necessary to review all of the 
 workflow (ALs, Filters, both kinds of Guides, even Menus) the you 
 had disabled and replaced with custom objects for _changes_ made by 
 the patch.  I found several where I had to modify my custom objects 
 to incorporate changes (new Set Field or Change Field actions, or 
 qualifications, or mappings On Open or On Close) made by the patch 
 to the OOTB object, and of course re-disable the OOTB object.  
 [example: Active Link INT:HPDTMS:INC:CreateNewTaskOpenTAS]  This is 
 the other place that Migrator will help you - identifying the 
 workflow that the patch has changed that might affect your customizations.
 
 When we started testing, we were planning to add Asset Management to 
 our system, which comes in at patch 003 and requires that you re-run 
 patch 007 to bring it up even to the other apps (we went live on 
 patch 007 in May 2008), which also reapplies 007 to your existing 
 apps and wipes out their customizations.  In this scenario, I had 
 several hours of cleanup work to do plus the down time of installing 
 Asset, and when we failed to acquire Asset I was able to drop this 
 requirement.  The problem is that patch 007 (and earlier) all may 
 have devastating effects on your customizations since they overwrite 
 some forms rather than update them, and replace a lot of form views. 
  They also replaced a number of Report records with ones that have 
 incorrect or NULL  Locale information - I usually have to go back 
 and re-set them to en_US manually.  Patches 008 and 009 are much 
 more benign by comparison, but they do include a complete re-design 
 of the CTM:People Search form and several others to use external 
 qualifications.  It is an improvement, but it forced me to re-
 develop our customizations to that module completely.
 
 On the AR Server side, we originally rehearsed patching from ARS 
 7.1.00.002 to 006, and found that the main changes that affected our 
 customizations were to the Password Management subsystem.  For now I 
 plan to leave it at 7.1.00.002 since I _supposedly_ can upgrade 
 directly from 7.1.00.002 to 7.5.00.001.  We'll see if that actually works.
 
 If you have Remedy Knowledge Management installed (which is a 
 completely manual integration), patches before 008 would damage it,
  and 9002 would wipe it out completely.  Nice to see that the BMC 
 developers coordinated their patches so well with each other.
 
 Also, remember to flush your mid-tier cache after the patching 
 process is complete and force a new pre-fetch of the updated applications.
 
 Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
 Call Tracking Administration Manager
 University of North Texas Computing  IT Center
 http://itsm.unt.edu/
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rondeau Sent: Tuesday, 
 June 09, 2009 5:36 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Looking for 
 best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0 Importance: High
 
 **
 Hi,
 
 Attempting to upgrade from 7.0.1 patch 2 to 7.1 patch 7
 
 Basically we have:
 
 Arserver -  7.0.1 patch 2 upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
 Approver  - 7.0.1upgrade to 7.1 
 patch 7 Change  - 7.0.2  
  upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7 Incident   - 7.0.2 
upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7 Problem  - 7.0.2 
upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
 
 So I did upgrade/patch 
 Arserver/Approval/assignment/Change/Incident/Problem and my forms 
 got overwritten and workflow I have shut off is back on.   So do I 
 need to reimport my forms and workflow?
 
 This is all on Windows 2003 running SQL 2005.
 
 Looking for others that have upgraded ITSM module and what they have 
 done.
 
 Thanks
 
 Tim
 _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the 
 Answers Are_
 
 
_
__
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the 
 Answers Are


--
Open 

Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-10 Thread strauss
That would make a lot of sense if the consultant had done your customizations 
for you.  Otherwise, not quite so much.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing  IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of dcharters
 Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:21 PM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0
 
 Hire a consultant that has done it before:)

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-09 Thread Tim Rondeau
Hi,

Attempting to upgrade from 7.0.1 patch 2 to 7.1 patch 7

Basically we have:

Arserver -  7.0.1 patch 2 upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Approver  - 7.0.1upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Change  - 7.0.2   upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Incident   - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Problem  - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7

So I did upgrade/patch Arserver/Approval/assignment/Change/Incident/Problem and 
my forms got overwritten and workflow I have shut off is back on.   So do I 
need to reimport my forms and workflow?

This is all on Windows 2003 running SQL 2005.

Looking for others that have upgraded ITSM module and what they have done.

Thanks

Tim

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-09 Thread Nall, Roger
If you have customized and forms or work flow from the OOB applications it is 
my understanding that you need to re-import your forms, work flow and data. I 
do not use OOB applications but I have seen enough postings.

HTH,

Roger A. Nall
Manager
Service Assurance/National Applications
T-Mobile, USA
Desk:972-464-3712 NEW
Cell: 973-652-6723
FAX:
sf49fanv AIM IM
RogerNall Yahoo IM
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rondeau
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 5:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0
Importance: High

**
Hi,

Attempting to upgrade from 7.0.1 patch 2 to 7.1 patch 7

Basically we have:

Arserver -  7.0.1 patch 2 upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Approver  - 7.0.1upgrade to 7.1 patch 7
Change  - 7.0.2   upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Incident   - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7
Problem  - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7

So I did upgrade/patch Arserver/Approval/assignment/Change/Incident/Problem and 
my forms got overwritten and workflow I have shut off is back on.   So do I 
need to reimport my forms and workflow?

This is all on Windows 2003 running SQL 2005.

Looking for others that have upgraded ITSM module and what they have done.

Thanks

Tim
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-09 Thread Howard Richter
Tim,

The issue will be the plugins. There were some major changes between patch 2
and patch 3 (or 4).

From the app side, the data should be ok, however, off the top of my head I
can not think of anything.

Good luck,

Howard

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Tim Rondeau 
timothy.rond...@phaseforward.com wrote:

 **

 Hi,



 Attempting to upgrade from 7.0.1 patch 2 to 7.1 patch 7



 Basically we have:



 Arserver -  7.0.1 patch 2 upgrade to 7.1 patch 7

 Approver  - 7.0.1upgrade to 7.1 patch 7

 Change  - 7.0.2   upgrade to 7.0.3
 patch 7

 Incident   - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3
 patch 7

 Problem  - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch
 7



 So I did upgrade/patch Arserver/Approval/assignment/Change/Incident/Problem
 and my forms got overwritten and workflow I have shut off is back on.   So
 do I need to reimport my forms and workflow?



 This is all on Windows 2003 running SQL 2005.



 Looking for others that have upgraded ITSM module and what they have done.



 Thanks



 Tim
 _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers
 Are_




-- 
Howard Richter
Red Hat Certified Technician
CompTIA Linux+ Certified
ITIL Foundation Certified
E-Mail = hbr4...@gmail.com
LinkedIn Profile = http://www.linkedin.com/in/hbr4270

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

2009-06-09 Thread Lyle Taylor
Actually, starting with patch 003 or 004 (I think the latter), BMC changed its 
strategy for updating patched forms in ITSM.  The new patches replace the 
existing form with their patched version rather than just updating the existing 
form.  This means that any additional fields that you have added will be 
deleted from the form, and any data in those fields will be lost.  If you've 
added any custom fields, you will first need to export your data and 
customizations, then apply the patch, reapply your customizations and reimport 
the values for your custom fields.

As a matter of course, all customized (e.g., disabled OOB workflow) must be 
verified after any patch activity to verify that it has not been changed by the 
patch.  That is true of any patch, not just the ITSM patches (although, you can 
often narrow down what workflow to verify by the subsystem or application it 
belongs to and what's being patched).

Lyle

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Howard Richter
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 5:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for best way to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0

**
Tim,

The issue will be the plugins. There were some major changes between patch 2 
and patch 3 (or 4).

From the app side, the data should be ok, however, off the top of my head I 
can not think of anything.

Good luck,

Howard
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Tim Rondeau 
timothy.rond...@phaseforward.commailto:timothy.rond...@phaseforward.com 
wrote:
**

Hi,



Attempting to upgrade from 7.0.1 patch 2 to 7.1 patch 7



Basically we have:



Arserver -  7.0.1 patch 2 upgrade to 7.1 patch 7

Approver  - 7.0.1upgrade to 7.1 patch 7

Change  - 7.0.2   upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7

Incident   - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7

Problem  - 7.0.2upgrade to 7.0.3 patch 7



So I did upgrade/patch Arserver/Approval/assignment/Change/Incident/Problem and 
my forms got overwritten and workflow I have shut off is back on.   So do I 
need to reimport my forms and workflow?



This is all on Windows 2003 running SQL 2005.



Looking for others that have upgraded ITSM module and what they have done.



Thanks



Tim
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.netmailto:rmisoluti...@verizon.net 
ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_



--
Howard Richter
Red Hat Certified Technician
CompTIA Linux+ Certified
ITIL Foundation Certified
E-Mail = hbr4...@gmail.commailto:hbr4...@gmail.com
LinkedIn Profile = http://www.linkedin.com/in/hbr4270
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
copies of the original message.



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are