Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
** You might review this PPT and see if something jumps out at you - http://communities.bmc.com/communities/docs/DOC-2841 I wrote it with support from the Remedy Engineers to try to cover as much as possible. Kelly Deaver kdea...@kellydeaver.com (Yes, I work for BMC. This post reflects the opinions of the poster and not the official opinion of BMC) Original Message Subject: Mid Tier - Load BalancersFrom: "Hyunkel v2.0" Date: Tue, August 11, 2009 11:28 amTo: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG** Listers:We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summaryWe have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one.All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers)Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistanceActually we are getting 3 kind of error messages1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tierWith this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application.1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that?2.- If so, could give us a hand?Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. Comparte tus recuerdos en línea con quien tú desees quien tú desees. _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
Here is what we do… (We have 2 cName aliases 1 for MT "arsweb" and 1 for ARS "prodars" that are load balanced) The LB points a user to one of our MT servers which connects to the ARS on the same box. We added to that server's /etc/hosts file so that the cName for the MT points to the MT on that server. We did the same for the cName of ARS. This way once a user is on a prod box they stay on that server (any reference to the MT load balanced cName goes to the MT on that same server, any reference to the ARS load balanced cName goes to the ARS on that same server) Each MT server is configured to know the load balanced ARS cName and the local server name only. Each ARS server knows itself by both the local name and the load balanced cName. It may not be the best method of doing this but it works. Fred -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:51 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers We used the physical address and the problem still there Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® -Original Message- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:15:04 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG You could try configuring each Mid-Tier to point to the physical IP of each App server and see if the problem goes away, if it does then you know it's a problem with the load balancer between them... -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:11 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** It seems that, actually our networking team has configured this to high persistance, but it seems that the web servers still referencing to other ar server Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 -Original Message- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:44 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG It sounds like you may be having problems with the load balancer between the web and the app moving you around when you don't want it too. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:47 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers Yes, BigIP is the generig name that is in front of the three web servers and handle all the transactions based on the load balancer rules and also they send information to any of the app servers Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 -Original Message- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:46 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
Alright, that rules out that load balancer, what if you access each midtier through it's physical IP, while it's configured to point to the static ip of the app server, any problems there? _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:51 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** We used the physical address and the problem still there Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _ Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:15:04 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** You could try configuring each Mid-Tier to point to the physical IP of each App server and see if the problem goes away, if it does then you know it's a problem with the load balancer between them... _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:11 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** It seems that, actually our networking team has configured this to high persistance, but it seems that the web servers still referencing to other ar server Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _ Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:44 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** It sounds like you may be having problems with the load balancer between the web and the app moving you around when you don't want it too. _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:47 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Yes, BigIP is the generig name that is in front of the three web servers and handle all the transactions based on the load balancer rules and also they send information to any of the app servers Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you _ Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:46 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
We used the physical address and the problem still there Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:15:04 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** You could try configuring each Mid-Tier to point to the physical IP of each App server and see if the problem goes away, if it does then you know it's a problem with the load balancer between them... From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:11 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** It seems that, actually our networking team has configured this to high persistance, but it seems that the web servers still referencing to other ar server Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:44 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** It sounds like you may be having problems with the load balancer between the web and the app moving you around when you don't want it too. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:47 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Yes, BigIP is the generig name that is in front of the three web servers and handle all the transactions based on the load balancer rules and also they send information to any of the app servers Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:46 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
You could try configuring each Mid-Tier to point to the physical IP of each App server and see if the problem goes away, if it does then you know it's a problem with the load balancer between them... _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:11 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** It seems that, actually our networking team has configured this to high persistance, but it seems that the web servers still referencing to other ar server Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _ Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:44 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** It sounds like you may be having problems with the load balancer between the web and the app moving you around when you don't want it too. _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:47 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Yes, BigIP is the generig name that is in front of the three web servers and handle all the transactions based on the load balancer rules and also they send information to any of the app servers Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you _ Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:46 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _ Comparte tus recuerdos en línea con quien tú desees quien <http://www.microsoft.com/mexico/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.a spx?tab=1> tú
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
It seems that, actually our networking team has configured this to high persistance, but it seems that the web servers still referencing to other ar server Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:44 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** It sounds like you may be having problems with the load balancer between the web and the app moving you around when you don't want it too. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:47 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Yes, BigIP is the generig name that is in front of the three web servers and handle all the transactions based on the load balancer rules and also they send information to any of the app servers Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:46 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. Comparte tus recuerdos en línea con quien tú desees quien tú desees. _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ¿Quieres un regalo de cumpleaños? Messenger te lo da _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _ Con Windows Liv
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
It sounds like you may be having problems with the load balancer between the web and the app moving you around when you don't want it too. _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:47 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Yes, BigIP is the generig name that is in front of the three web servers and handle all the transactions based on the load balancer rules and also they send information to any of the app servers Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you _ Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:46 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _ Comparte tus recuerdos en línea con quien tú desees quien <http://www.microsoft.com/mexico/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.a spx?tab=1> tú desees. _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _ ¿Quieres un regalo de cumpleaños? Messenger te lo da _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
Yes, BigIP is the generig name that is in front of the three web servers and handle all the transactions based on the load balancer rules and also they send information to any of the app servers Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:39:46 -0600 From: lj.longw...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. Comparte tus recuerdos en línea con quien tú desees quien tú desees. _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _ Feliz aniversario Messenger! www.aniversariomessenger.com.mx ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
SunOS 5.10 Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:38:46 -0500 > From: frederick.w.gro...@xo.com > Subject: Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > What OS? > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers > > Listers: > > We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. > let me give you a brief summary > > We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. > All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both > sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) > Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance > > Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages > > 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user > 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server > 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier > > With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier > still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency > in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. > > 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? > 2.- If so, could give us a hand? > > Best Regards > Hugo Ruesga > perotsystems® > US 972.577.7000 > MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 > > ___ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _ Con Windows Live, puedes organizar, editar y compartir tus fotos. http://www.microsoft.com/mexico/windows/windowslive/products/photo-gallery-edit.aspx ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
Hugo, When you say 'BigIP addresses on both sides', do you mean to see that you have a virtual name in front of the web servers that points you to one of the 3 based on your load balance rules, and that each web server then in turn goes to another load balanced IP to determine which Remedy server it goes to, or is each individual web server pointed to a specific remedy server? _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers ** Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _ Comparte tus recuerdos en línea con quien tú desees quien tú desees. <http://www.microsoft.com/mexico/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.a spx?tab=1> _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Mid Tier - Load Balancers
What OS? -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Hyunkel v2.0 Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Mid Tier - Load Balancers Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
Mid Tier - Load Balancers
Listers: We are facing a couple of issues with mid tier and with our load balancer. let me give you a brief summary We have 3 ARS Servers (ARS 7.1) with their own mid tier for each one. All of this are handle as a server group defined with a BigIP address on both sides (one for app servers and the other one for the web servers) Our load balancers are handle to make the connections with persistance Actually we are getting 3 kind of error messages 1.- ARERR 329 Failed authentication string for user 2.- ARERR 9350 related of a missing packages from mid tier to ar server 3.- ARERR 9351 related of a missing packages from browser to mid tier With this until we have defined and configured the loadbalancers the mid tier still sending packages to all the other app servers this gives inconsistency in the communication and affects the user experience inside the application. 1.- Anybody from the list has experienced something like that? 2.- If so, could give us a hand? Best Regards Hugo Ruesga perotsystems® US 972.577.7000 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _ Comparte tus recuerdos en línea con quien tú desees. http://www.microsoft.com/mexico/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.aspx?tab=1 ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"