Re: [Asterisk-Users] IPP g729 x86_64

2005-04-17 Thread denon
I'm curious, how are you licensing your codec? The source is open, but the 
codec usage licensing is not.  I think you'll find that licensing it from 
Digium will be much simpler, not to mention their code will Just Work(tm) 
without any messing around.

-d
At 12:08 PM 4/17/2005, you wrote:
Hi,
I 'm using a server DL145 with AMD opteron processors, with TE410P Digium 
Quad-Span card.
The server is running RHEL4  x86_64.

And have problem to compile codec g729 from 
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729/,
but ipp sample speech code not problem compile with ia32 or em64t.


use l_ipp_ia32_itanium_p_4_1_2 :
gcc -shared -static -Xlinker -x -o bin/codec_g729.so samples/util_e.o 
samples/util_d.o samples/codec_g729.o api/decg729fp.o api/encg729fp.o 
api/owng729fp.o api/usc729fp.o -L/opt/intel/ipp41/ia32_itanium/lib 
-lippscmerged -lippsrmerged -lippsmerged -lippcore -lpthread -lm
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.3/crtbeginT.o: 
relocation R_X86_64_32 against `__deregister_frame_info' can not be used 
when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.3/crtbeginT.o: could not read 
symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [bin/codec_g729.so] Error 1

Iand use from l_ipp_em64t_p_4_1_2 :
gcc -shared -static -Xlinker -x -o bin/codec_g729.so samples/util_e.o 
samples/util_d.o samples/codec_g729.o api/decg729fp.o api/encg729fp.o 
api/owng729fp.o api/usc729fp.o -L/opt/intel/ipp41/em64t/lib -lippscem64t 
-lippsrem64t -lippsem64t -lippcoreem64t 
-L/opt/intel/ipp41/em64t/sharedlib/linuxem64t -lguide -lpthread -lm
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.3/crtbeginT.o: 
relocation R_X86_64_32 against `__deregister_frame_info' can not be used 
when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.3/crtbeginT.o: could not read 
symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [bin/codec_g729.so] Error 1


Any thoughts?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Petition for IAX firmware

2005-04-05 Thread denon
Hi all,
I've put together a quick petition, in hopes that we can possibly persuade 
Sipura (or any other large-scale IP handset manufacturer) to include 
firmware support for IAX. The IAXy has proven that an IAX product is in 
demand, and very useful, and I think we'd all like to see a handset 
manufacturer follow Digium's lead. I'm not particularly endorsing Sipura, 
however I do know that they have seriously considered support for IAX, and 
have decided to hold off until the demand is there. I'm hoping that with 
some numbers, we can prove to them that the demand is already here, and 
that IAX is already a viable technology.

I'd like to encourage everyone to show your support -- hopefully Sipura, 
and/or other manufacturers will see these hard names and numbers, and 
realize it's time to move something into production.

Petition:
http://www.petitiononline.com/IAXPhone
Thanks,
-d
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin

2005-03-31 Thread denon
First, I suppose, you'd have to write it ..
AFAIK, the webmin project was abandon a couple of years ago. I don't think 
it was ever even remotely near being completed.

-d
At 05:25 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote:
How do I install the asterisk module for webmin?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hold Pickup

2005-03-21 Thread denon
Look at bkw's valet parking
-d
At 03:58 PM 3/21/2005, you wrote:
I'm working through my list of features people will expect, and Hold 
Pickup is at the top at the moment -- has anyone done any work on 
this?  We've had some unpleasant experiences with call parking, and 
everyone seems to like the Hold Pickup model.  If you don't know what I 
mean by Hold Pickup, it's sort of a reverse transfer; pick up the nearest 
phone and dial prefix12345 to pick up a call holding on ext. 12345.

It looks like the closest to what I want (without changing Asterisk) would 
be Park followed by an AGI that pokes my manager-port client (which in 
turn would redirect the target extension's channel to...well, something) 
-- if the parking space was returned to the dialplan somehow (or if Park() 
didn't ignore its arguments).

At the moment, I'm using the v1-0 branch and at this point it looks like 
our phones will be all SIP (i.e., madding chan_sip to make sendonly 
channels visible to the dialplan somehow isn't automatically out of the 
question).

--
Joshua P. Dady
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardphone deployment recommendation

2005-03-07 Thread denon
Isn't the idea of this, to sort of use the desk as it's plane to pick up 
sound? I thought a few vendors did this kind of thing...

-d
At 03:33 PM 3/7/2005, you wrote:
The microphone is [somewhat inexplicably] mounted in the base over a hole 
that
faces downwards, between two of the rubber feet, its like a 'U' with a dot
inside it.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] simpletelecom.com??? are they a SCAM?

2005-02-19 Thread denon
I don't know - they look kinda lame. I mean, why is their SIP server 
seemingly better-routed than their IAX server? In my case, their IAX server 
is almost 20ms further away than the SIP one -- seems odd to me.

Think I'll stick with Nufone - very well routed, and only ~15ms away. :)
-d
At 06:37 PM 2/19/2005, you wrote:
I have been using simpletelecom.com for over 2  months now to make
outboudn long distance calls, I didn't have any problems what so ever
with them.
To send callerid this is how I do it:
exten = 81NXXNXX,1,SetCallerID(MY NAME 1235551234)
exten = 81NXXNXX,2,Dial(SIP/${SIMPLETELE}/${EXTEN:1},60,tr)
exten = 81NXXNXX,3,Congestion
Caller ID will be passed like this, however in most cases the name is
not passed along but looked up in an SS7 database against the number
passed along and that name is displayed, meaning you can't have your
name changed.
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:31:12 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On February 19, 2005 10:56 am, Madhawa wrote:
  Hi List!
  any body use www.simpletelecom.com?

  so anyone here has experience with them? are they a SCAM?

 This is -biz material.  Spew your is this a scam bullshit there.

 -A.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk@home scary log

2005-02-10 Thread denon
Why would you even want SSH exposed to the world? In fact, why expose it to 
anything but your local admin console, or *maybe* a vpn tunnel server if 
absolutely necessary?

-d
At 10:08 AM 2/10/2005, you wrote:
The hack came in through ssh.
IMO, your best defence is an extremely strong root password; I am often
mortified by looking at my logs and seeing all of the login attempts through
SSH.
OT: I am not up on Linux script-kiddie type tools, but I assume that there
is a script of some sort that automates SSH probes. Can anyone suggest a
good counter i.e. honeypot or throttling logon attempts. Yes, I know I can
google it, but I'd rather hear the opinion of real Linux experts rather than
the experts at About.com.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiport Fax over softphone

2005-01-31 Thread denon


Hi Tim,
No hardware - been done, see rxfax. Dumps it to a tiff, you can do
whatever you want with it (email it out, convert to pdf, send to a
printer .. OCR and voice to speech it and play it over the PA system ...
:)
-d
At 01:07 PM 1/31/2005, you wrote:
How
hard would it be to write (or has this been done?) a module that would
receive a fax and save or deliver the file? Would you need any hardware
at all ?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:


http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiport Fax over softphone

2005-01-31 Thread denon
I assume he meant no fax-capable card, or anything with fax DSPs, as that's 
generally needed. Having seen his previous posts, I assume he's more 
familiar with * than to assume the phone line will telepathically find it's 
way into the server.

-d
At 01:26 PM 1/31/2005, you wrote:
No Hardware ?? u only so whats going to determine its a fax ? you
need a dedicated box if you have no line card in the box. asterisk + SIP
is not capable of determining whats a fax and whats voice. you need
a card unless you have a dedicated number
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 13:12 -0600, denon wrote:
 Hi Tim,

 No hardware - been done, see rxfax.  Dumps it to a tiff, you can do
 whatever you want with it (email it out, convert to pdf, send to a
 printer .. OCR and voice to speech it and play it over the PA
 system ... :)

 -d

 At 01:07 PM 1/31/2005, you wrote:
  How hard would it be to write (or has this been done?) a module that
  would receive a fax and save or deliver the file? Would you need any
  hardware at all ?
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
skamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] G.729? Worth it?

2005-01-19 Thread denon
At 01:49 PM 1/19/2005, you wrote:
There are systems that use G.711 when traffic is light, but
switch to compression codecs under heavy traffic to conserve
bandwidth.  I don't know how/if this can be done in Asterisk.
--Stewart

I don't think there's anything like that built into * as it is now, but it 
would be pretty trivial to write a script to handle such a thing. Effective 
monitoring of the traffic  conditions may require a bit more work .. 
monitoring latencies, and maybe monitoring current utilizations via snmp on 
your core routers/switches/etc. A quick probe to the management interface 
would also give you some insight on current call volume, of course.

-d
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] long delays in list posts?

2005-01-13 Thread denon
So? it's a big list .. I'm sure if you'd like to donate some quad xeons and 
gigE pipes, it could be resolved very quickly..

-d
At 04:41 PM 1/13/2005, you wrote:
OMG! 1 hour?!?! I just now got this at 4:40PM. It takes an hour for my
emails to get posted to the list? Geez..
-Matthew
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Boehm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 3:24 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] long delays in list posts?
 Hey guys, I sent an email to the list at 2:57PM central. I just now see it
 on the list, and its 3:23PM.

 Anyone else experience this? I am sending this email at 3:24PM central.
Lets
 see when it gets posted to the list.

 -Matthew

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] echo cancelation on Digium T1 cards

2005-01-10 Thread denon
That's data or fax CNG, not dtmf. And yes, it's disabled for the duration 
of the fax or data session.

-d
At 11:36 PM 1/10/2005, you wrote:
Hello all,
I am getting console debug messages about tone detected on channel XX, 
disabling echo cancelation on channel XX when using echocancel=yes with a 
Digium T1 card.

does this mean that DTMF breaks the echo can?  Does Asterisk permanently 
disable the echo can or is it for that channel instance only?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 released

2004-09-23 Thread denon
Old news, Asterisk 1.0 released .. :)
Here's another mirror -- should be very fast from most anywhere. Take it 
easy on Digium's bandwidth. :)

http://asterisk.paperwork.com
-d
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 released

2004-09-23 Thread denon
You can snag em from http://asterisk.paperwork.com  and if you drop me a 
note with your url, I'll add it to the list.

-d
At 10:11 AM 9/23/2004, you wrote:
If anyone who got the 1.0 tar's would be able to get them to me I'd be
more than willing to donate traffic toward the effort by mirroring it
on some bandwidth.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 released

2004-09-23 Thread denon
hehe .. I think we have more bandwidth than sourceforge now.. I've got like 
9 on my list now.

-d
At 10:58 AM 9/23/2004, you wrote:
Maybe someone should make a bittorrent?  I will contribute some BW
if there is a torrent.
Steve
Kenneth Shaw wrote:
To be Slashdotted within 30 minutes.
-Ken Shaw...
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 07:28, Lex Lethol wrote:

Hi,
Reporting from Astricon, Mark uploaded the 1.0 release while giving
his speech a few mintues ago..
Bring out the champagne :)
Lethol
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk , ISA Firewall/VPN , STUN and other

2004-09-21 Thread denon


Keep in mind, PPTP will only tunnel through the NAT, as long as GRE (prot
47) is properly tunneled along with tcp 1723. This support is relatively
standard in common NATs, but it's not a given.
-denon
At 09:23 PM 9/21/2004, you wrote:
First,
I assume that you will be running NAT at both locations, if that is not
the case, then the configuration will change.

When you said VPN, are you using PPTP or IPSEC?
Microsoft supports PPTP. In order to connect a PC over VPN to the office,
which has a PPTP VPN Server, you will need to runs VPN software. After it
is run, the PC obtains a new IP address from your office, If you are
using soft phone on a Windows PC, you can communicate without any problem
as the IP is now tunnelled via internet to the office from your PC.
Please note that PPTP VPN can tunnel through NAT and should be allowed to
tunnel through Firewall as well before soft phone can be used.

From your description, I feel that IPSEC may be
a better solution. IPSEC can route/merge two remote subnets together. If
you are connecting two sites using IPSEC, you can start any service and a
hardware SIP phone should be fine. Just make sure your DNS and gateway
setups are correct. And your PC can see across the IPSEC tunnel without
loading any VPN software.

Henry

--

From: Shawn Dillon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:39 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Asterisk , ISA Firewall/VPN , STUN and other
issues

I have just finished compiling and installing Asterisk on a test
Debian
system. All is working well. We are now attempting to get remote
offices
to test the system I have installed both a SIP and an IAX client at
a
remote office. Then I connect to our office via Microsoft ISA
firewall
and the Windows XP VPN client. Neither of the softphones will
connect.
On the IAX softphone I just get a ringtone , on the SIP client
nothing.
The Debian machine has two NIC's , one with a static external IP and
one
with an internal IP. Our remote offices are behind a mixture of
firewalls.


I have some questions with regards to our testing and setup.

1) Is there a way to get the SIP/IAX
client to work via the VPN?
This would be the easiest way.
2) If not can I install a STUN server
on the same machine as the *
server? Can it use the same internal and external IP's as the *
server?
3) Is there a hardphone that supports
VPN that has been tested?
4) What is the best hardphone to use
with Asterisk?


Thanks for the input
Shawn Dillon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] The CISCO 7940 Tranfer Button..

2004-08-11 Thread denon
I agree entirely!  I've been told it's not possible, but I'd love for 
someone to prove me/them wrong.

-d
At 11:54 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if any CISCO users out there knows if it is possible to
Change the locations of the BUTTONS along the bottom of the screen.
I ask this as the TRANSFER button is only accessible after pushing the
more button.
This is a pain as it's the MOST used button.  So having to push two buttons
to get to it is a real pain.
Thanks,
James Gardiner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] I wanna buy a new X100P

2003-12-30 Thread denon
Sure, head to :
http://store.yahoo.com/asteriskpbx/wildcardx100p.html
-d

At 12:25 PM 12/30/2003, you wrote:

I'm trying to buy a new X100P but
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/bsdmall/wisifxoin.html
is failing to check the order
Anybody knows any other way to purchase it?
Isamar

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] FWD problems

2003-12-24 Thread denon
I've been having issues getting FWD to work.  I posted this same Q to the 
FWD forum (no responses yet), but I was hoping someone here had some insight:

http://yabb.pulver.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=news;action=display;num=1072263468;start=0#0

I just signed up for an FWD account (I know I had one before, but I lost 
it..  :)

I've got it running through Asterisk - all working fine from a SIP 
standpoint. I can dial FWD numbers like 612/613/etc and everything 
works.  However, if I dial *18005551212 or *408xxx (say, a USA number), 
I either get a fast busy or a This service is only available to FreeWorld 
Dialup members.

Am I missing something? I signed up, got my password .. the sip is 
registered, firewall is open, no NAT, etc. I've tried a variety of combos 
in dialing/etc .. to no avail. Is my account pending some type of 
activation or such?

Possibly / likely related, it seems that the * doesn't work when I'm 
trying to set up the voicemail either. I'm using a Cisco 7960 (but 
remember, it's actually Asterisk linking us together). The 7960 does have a 
* dialplan, so that shouldnt be an issue.

Any ideas you guys have would be great!

Here's what my sip.conf looks like:
register=9:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/453
It shows that it's registered in sip sho reg..

[fwd]
type=friend
secret=password
username=9
fromuser=9  ; I dont need this .. but worth a shot, tried with and 
without
nat=yes ;I'm not behind nat, but I thought I'd try it 
anyway
fromdomain=fwd.pulver.com   ; Don't need this either. .but what the hay
host=fwd.pulver.com
canreinvite=no  ; worth a shot, right?
reinvite=no
I then have an extension that does:
exten = _7.,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-d

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Call Recording

2003-12-17 Thread denon
Hi all,

I know there have been some neat changes to how call recording works 
lately, and so therefore it's much easier to do .. but I haven't been able 
to find any details in the archives about the best way to accomplish it 
these days.  Does anyone have a sample of their config they'd share, or a 
macro they use? I'd really appreciate it ..

-d

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Queue only ringing one agent at a time

2003-12-12 Thread denon
That works better here in Minnesota .. Land of 10,000 Lakes .. go pick one 
and jump. :)

-d

At 05:16 PM 12/12/2003, you wrote:
 Instead of quacking out useless information, it's more useful to not 
answer.

Their are alot high places on this planet.. pick one and jump.

bkw
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP (peer to peer?)

2003-12-09 Thread denon


Depends if you're phone supports it, and you have reinvites etc enables
in *.
-d
At 03:17 PM 12/8/2003, you wrote:
Hi
all,
Has anyone have an idea why, if you capture the files on a Asterisk
network (ex with Ethereal) you always see the communication between the
two sip phones( hard or soft) passing through the asterisk server (on UDP
layer)?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office / 
Isn't SIP a protocol that (after that it has established the call) , he
connects the two users with each other?

Maybe a stupid question, but I'm not a SIP expert.

Thank you for your help.

Wim



Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI Programs

2003-08-27 Thread denon
Some ADSI phones come locked to a certain service provider.  You cannot 
load your own adsi scripts into these phones - you need one that isn't tied 
to a specific company or pbx.

-d

At 06:35 PM 8/27/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,

one question:

What you mean with unlocked ?

-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von jerk face
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 18:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI Programs
I just received an unlocked ADSI phone and I am
playing with the ADSI script.
I was wondering how I can include Voicemail functions
(Check new messages, Delete message) into the soft
buttons.
I checked in app_voicemail.c and it looks like these
functions have already been programmed.
Is there a voicemail.adsi script somewhere?  If not,
then how do I get the functions I want onto my phone?
Thank you for your time.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Analog lines

2003-08-19 Thread denon


Adtran 750 channel bank and a T100P.
-d
At 01:06 PM 8/19/2003 -0300, you wrote:
Hello,

I am looking for hardware for
Asterisk.
I want to connect analog lines (from 6 to 12 or
more) to Asterisk, what will be the best hardware for that?

Thanks,
Bartosz






RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream Budgetone

2003-08-17 Thread denon
Are these locked to the service, though? Look what vonage managed .. :)

-d

At 12:36 PM 8/17/2003 -0400, you wrote:
$75 for the single ethernet port version and $85 for the dual ethernet
port version.
You can get two for $129 at www.sipphone.com



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream Budgetone
Does anyone know what the Grandstream Budgetone is going for $$$ in the
US? I didn't immediately see pricing on the phones page.
AJ
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Transfer, Budgettone 100

2003-07-30 Thread denon
Last I checked, SIP transfer to park doesn't work .. only way to do it is 
using T and a # transfer .. which is ugly.  Has this been fixed?

-d

At 10:51 AM 7/30/2003 +0200, you wrote:
park the call

On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi,
 can someone who has used Budgettone phones tell me how to do the
 following:

 an incoming call comes in and is answered by the receptionist.
 she need to put the call on hold, speak to whoever the call is for,
 and either (after that) pass on the call, otherwise speak again to
 whoever was on the call and hang up ..

 so far i've got as far as a blind transfer by pressing transfer button
 and then the new extension ..

 cheers
 Dave
 ---
 Email sent using AnyEmail (http://netbula.com/anyemail/)
 Netbula LLC is not responsible for the content of this email

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phone System Questions

2003-07-12 Thread denon
Yes, you can do all this ..
an X100P and two TDM400s, one with all 4 FXS, one with only 1 FXS.
-d

At 07:53 PM 7/12/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Hi all,

I need a phone system that has 2 incomming lines and 5 extentions.

I will need music on hold

I need all incomming callers to get a message: press 1 for x 2 for y,
etc
I need extentions to be able to make outgoing calls on the 2 lines

Can Asterisk do this, if so, what hardware do I need?

Michael Hess
Swirltech
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP immediate hangups with latest CVS

2003-07-11 Thread denon
I had this a while back, and set canreinvite=no, and it fixed it.

-d

At 08:42 PM 7/11/2003 -0700, you wrote:

I've been banging my head on this for several hours, and I have no idea 
what's going on.   Maybe there is a very simple result, and I've been 
looking too hard at this this evening.  This is a brand new system, and 
I'm wondering if there have been SIP bugs introduced in the latest CVS 
that are preventing from working what should be a stupendously simple test.

- Cisco 7960 (non-NATed)
- RH 8.0
- Asterisk CVS update as of ~8:00 PM EDT
- full make clean; make install on [asterisk,zaptel,libpri]
- 2ghz box with E1 card (that's pretty much not part of the equation)
I have boiled the configuration down to an extremely (_extremely_) simple 
setup, and it does not work.  SIP calls from the 7960 are hanging up 
almost immediately, with no audio getting through.   It seems that the 
hangup happens just after the moment that the 7960 sends the ACK message 
(judging from the debug below, at least.)  I have verified that 
demo-congrats is there, as my original problem stemmed from strange 
behavior with Zap dialing, and I kept simplifying, so this is the 
culmination of winnowing down the options to the most basic config.  The 
same phone works flawlessly with other lines that are configured on it to 
other * servers.

Here is my entire relevant configuration.  It's as simple as you can get, 
really.  I dial 14109850123 (as a test number - it matches the _1X. list) 
and I get an almost instant hangup.

---
;sip.conf
[general]
port = 5060 ; Port to bind to
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0  ; Address to bind to
context = default   ; Default for incoming calls
dtmfmode=rfc2833
allow=all
[3015321510]
type=friend
username=3015321510
secret=fluffernutter
host=dynamic
context=from-sip
allow=all
---
;extensions.conf
[general]
static=yes
writeprotect=yes
[from-sip]
exten = _1X.,1,SetCallerID(3015321510)
exten = _1X.,2,Answer
exten = _1X.,3,Playback(demo-congrats)
exten = h,1,Hangup
exten = t,1,Hangup
exten = i,1,Hangup
---
Other strange notes:
 - quite often, when launching with -gcd I get a segfault.  I have 
the cores, if anyone is interested.
 - I have almost identical systems (same hardware, same MB, etc.) 
churning away with no problems with slightly older revs of code



*CLI
Sip read:
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 128.151.224.33:5060
From: 3015321510 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=0002b9eb0ef4012c1a228361-11beb479
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:24:34 GMT
CSeq: 101 INVITE
User-Agent: CSCO/4
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Expires: 180
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 247
Accept: application/sdp
Remote-Party-ID: 3015321510 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=no

v=0
o=Cisco-SIPUA 15975 21108 IN IP4 128.151.224.33
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 128.151.224.33
t=0 0
m=audio 19364 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
14 headers, 11 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 128.151.224.33 : 5060 (non-NAT)
Found audio format 0
Found audio format 8
Found audio format 18
Found audio format 101
Found description format PCMU
Found description format PCMA
Found description format G729
Found description format telephone-event
Capabilities: us - 2147483647, them - 268/0, combined - 268
Non-codec capabilities: us - 1, them - 1, combined - 1
Reliably Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 128.151.224.33:5060
From: 3015321510 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=0002b9eb0ef4012c1a228361-11beb479
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as74174b76
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 101 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Contact:
Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm=asterisk, nonce=2c9c06be
Content-Length: 0

 to 128.151.224.33:5060
Sip read:
ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 128.151.224.33:5060
From: 3015321510 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=0002b9eb0ef4012c1a228361-11beb479
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as74174b76
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:24:34 GMT
CSeq: 101 ACK
Content-Length: 0

8 headers, 0 lines
Sip read:
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 128.151.224.33:5060
From: 3015321510 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=0002b9eb0ef4012c1a228361-11beb479
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:24:34 GMT
CSeq: 102 INVITE
User-Agent: CSCO/4
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Proxy-Authorization: Digest 
username=3015321510,realm=asterisk,uri=sip:64.33.1.8,response=4a9e7d0429571ec4047634179fc43f2d,nonce=2c9c06be,algorithm=md5
Expires: 180
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 247
Remote-Party-ID: 3015321510 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=no

v=0
o=Cisco-SIPUA 15975 21108 IN IP4 128.151.224.33

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Migration to Asterisk - Running off of Merlin Legend system

2003-07-03 Thread denon
At 04:11 PM 7/3/2003 -0400, you wrote:
We currently have a Merlin Legend system.  The voicemail is falling apart
(with the transition to a 10 digit timestamp on Sept. 8, 2001, the system
locked up and refused to take calls; the official solution is to change
the system time back to a year with a matching calendar).  We are in the
process of preparing the network infrastructure to support a VoIP system
with Asterisk, but won't be there for a few months.  We'd like to go ahead
and replace the voicemail system with Asterisk now, and as we're ready,
drop the Merlin system.
My questions:

Right now, the voicemail system (and auto-attendant) are connected to the
switch by 4 analog lines.  Logic says that these are FXS cards in the
switch, like any other extension.  The switch handles an incoming call and
transfers it to the auto-attendant.  How would such a call be identified
to be dropped in the appropriate context?
Unless I'm mistaken, you just name those lines appropriately, then have 
matching extensions in your extensions.conf, like any other trunk.  The 
difference being, these lines go straight to an auto attend.  You could 
pass the extension to it via a dialed string, if need be.



When the phone switch fails to reach someone at an extension, it transfers
them to the voicemail system.  How could these calls be identified as
different from an incoming call to the auto-attendant?  How is the
appropriate mailbox or extension identified?
The dialed extension, or maybe a callerid string..

-denon

Thanks,

Steve

___
Steve Creel[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Minimum budget question ...

2003-07-01 Thread denon
What'd this device set ya back? Have a url?

-d

At 11:45 PM 6/30/2003 -0700, you wrote:

AudioCodes has one 24 port fxs sip interface, i have one 8 port fxs with 
SIP up and running with *

Michael Kane wrote:

The Cisco 242x (20 or 21), has a 24 port analog interface that supports 16
FXS and 8 FXO.  I've delpoyed hundreds of these IAD's signaling with MGCP.
Not sure if it supports SIP yet.  Hope this helps...
Mike

Michael Kane
To-Talk Communications LLC.
37 Sandusky Dr.
Wareham, Ma. 02571
508-295-2826
- Original Message - From: Andy Powell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Minimum budget question ...




Hi Tan,

Thanks for the reply. I'll end up asking a load more questions now...

What sort of prices are we talking about for the 24 port
VoIP gateway?
I assume that each port is individually addresable by *?

As I recall the 24 port gateways tend to be terminated at the FXS side
as some 'wierd' connector (wierd in that it's not rj45/11) do you just
wire this to a patch panel?
What codec is in use to get all 24 ports 'running' at the same time..G729?
Does this cause problems since iirc * needs to run in console mode for
the G729 codec to work properly
Thanks for the info... interesting site too :D

Andy



*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 30/06/2003 at 19:21 Tan Aks wrote:



Hi,

We provide asterisk-based solutions to customers based in the uk. One of
our
customers (9 users) is trialling our low-end solution which comprises of
a


box with 2 x X100P (analogue line) cards installed, and a voip carrier

for


outgoing calls. This customer intends to have 13 extensions in his live
scenario. The way to use multiple analogue phones is:
  1) get a T100P card and use a T1 channel bank sourced from the US
  2) use a couple of TDM400P cards to give 8 extensions, and use IP
phones for the other extensions
  3) use a voip gateway to provide up to 24 x analogue extensions
per


IP address. VoIP gateways are commonly available and convert analogue

lines


into a SIP/H323 VoIP stream.

You can get an E1 terminated with an RJ45. If you have a coax

termination


then you can use a balun to get rj45 connectivity.

Hope that helps.
Tan (telappliant.com)


- Original Message - From: Andy Powell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:26 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Minimum budget question ...

Tim,

a good comprehensive answer to the question...certainly gave me a few
things
to think about. I do have a few questions though, since I'm in Europe.
Has anyone in Europe set up something equivalent to what Tim suggested?

What sort of prices did it work out at?

How did you solve the channel bank 'issue' in Europe?

I keep reading that E1 lines are coax terminated, is this correct or do

you


usually get a choice from your teleco?

Were there any other issues to contend with?

I'd certainly be interested in the experiences of anyone in Europe...

Thanks

Andy



On 30/06/2003 at 10:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



If this is for commercial use, especially if you are going to be selling
this solution, I would suggest that you don't even offer the choice of
analog lines except in the smallest of offices.  Unless you like to
spend a lot of unbillable time supporting them :)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] CAC Access Bank

2003-06-18 Thread denon
I just picked up a couple CAC Access Bank 1s loaded with FXS that should be 
arriving shortly.  Does anyone have one that they use with Asterisk?  If 
so, would you be willing to shoot me a note with your current configs? I'm 
not very familiar with CAC/etc, and it would save me countless hours of 
muddling through .. :)

Any others tips you can give me on these banks would be very 
appreciated.  Also, any cheap source for FXOs on them? I'm told they're 
hard to come by ..

Thanks again,

-d

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] callerid time set

2003-06-17 Thread denon
Maybe the hardware date?

-d

At 05:07 PM 6/17/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Where is this time that is sent to the phones with the callerid info 
coming from ?

If I do date at the command line I get the correct time as set by ntp

yet the time the phones get set to is 50 minutes slow.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Survey

2003-06-14 Thread denon
Hi all,

I've put together a quick Asterisk survey, in an effort to attempt to get 
some insight into the overall direction of the project.  I'd appreciate if 
you could spend a couple minutes and run through this - I'll be happy to 
share the detailed results with Digium or anyone else who's 
interested.  It's a quick hack, but hopefully it'll answer some lingering 
questions.

The survey is at:
http://denon.cx/asterisk
Thanks!

-d

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware - Channelbank vs SIP etc

2003-06-10 Thread denon
We're doing a new * installation at a remote office soon, and I was just 
curious what people's opinions were on hardware these days .. I've had 
decent luck with T100Ps and Adtran, but I know times change ..

I'm looking to do roughly 15 handsets and 15 pstn, with some room to 
grow.  I had planned on two T100Ps and two adtran 750s, one for handsets, 
one for pstn.  I'm thinking of going SIP on the other side, though.  I've 
been looking at the Grandstream budgetone phones, as well as their 
handytone.  Anyone have anything good or bad to say on these?  Cisco is 
out of that office's budget, I'm afraid. We're replacing a cheapo key 
system there, so it's all about the benjamins.. :\

I was also looking at:
http://clipcomm.co.kr/eng/e_product/e_product_voip_analoggateway_4.html 
(rumored to be D-Link's OEM?)
and
http://www.yoda.com.tw/SOLUTIONS/vg422r.htm

Any thoughts on these?

Has anyone had good luck with other low-cost channels banks? (noo, not 
Zhone.. :)

Any tips are appreciated, you can catch me here or on irc as always ..

-d

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Call Parking on 7960

2003-06-04 Thread denon
Hi all,

I've got a fairly minor question, but it's getting on my nerves .. 
hopefully it's an easy answer.  I'm having trouble parking calls on our 
7960s.  It works fine on ZAP devices, though, and they're both using the 
same context.

What I do is:
When I'm on the call, I hit More, Transfer, 700, Dial.  I then get a fast 
busy.  If I dial 701, for example, I do get the no call parked here, so I 
know it's somewhat working.  If I try a blind transfer, it just says it failed.

Do I need to add an explicit extension with a ParkAndAnnounce for these? If 
so, anyone have a sample of what they use?

Thanks for any direction,

-d

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Whitenoise on TDM400p

2003-05-31 Thread denon
At 03:31 PM 5/31/2003 +1000, you wrote:
 I've seen exactly two people with this problem and it seems to be related
 to the system that it's running in, although I don't know if it's power
 supply, motherboard, or peripheral related, but somehow noise on the
 system power supply creeps into the system.  On the systems that had
 trouble, we found the noise was greatly improved by doing:

 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null 

 which basically spins the processor and keeps it from idling.  I'd like to
 hear from you off-list about this experience.
Could there be problems with noise on the line if you use a single CAT5
cable to carry all 4 phone lines? That is what I have done (just attach 4
rj-11 on each end) and while 2 of the lines seem fine, one seems to have a
fairly loud 'buzzing' sound...
Is that 'white noise' or is buzzing something different? Would/Should I use
4 separate cables, or do I just need to redo some of the wiring to solve the
problem?
Naah, you can do a lot more than that in a single bundle, unless there's 
something wrong with your wire .. a crimp somewhere, some scraped up 
insulation, etc.  Just make sure you have your pairs right .. now *that* 
could cause some interesting problems. :)

-d



Regards,
Adam
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Australia users?

2003-05-29 Thread denon
I've got an end-user in Australia that needs some gear .. I can ship it 
over there, but it'd be a bit of a pain to find adapters localized to AU, 
even though I know stuff is all 110/220 these days.

Anyone know a good cheap place to buy a Cisco ATA186 and maybe a 
Netgear/etc dsl router/switch in Queensland (or close to)?

Any advice would be helpful

-d

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI Programming of the Aastra Powertouch 480

2003-03-27 Thread denon
How do I do a manual flash hook? And sorry, I didn't elaborate enough - I'm 
using the Nortel Vista 390.  I don't see a flash button anywhere, only the 
link.  And the link doesn't work when I load it with *'s adsiprog.  Once I 
dump it, it's fine again . .



At 10:33 PM 3/27/2003 -0600, you wrote:
That is an annoying, arguably misfeature, of the Aastra.  The idea is that
the use of the programmed buttons should eliminate the need for the Link
button since manual flash hooks can get your phone out of sync.  Don't
worry you can use manual flash hooks in the mean time.
Mark

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, denon wrote:

 Does your link button work, after you program it with adsiprog? It broke on
 my 350 .. had to clear the asterisk load out again to use it.  Link/flash
 is sorta important to an asterisk phone...


 At 08:21 PM 3/27/2003 -0500, you wrote:
 Well, I almost cried... Here's why:
 
 I followed the unlock procedure on my unlocked 390, and it worked as
 outlined, so I did the big test; I tried to unlock my 350 that I've been
 trying to unlock for months.
 
 There isn't a Mute button, so I hit the Flash button instead.  Voila, it
 said Memory erase.  I tried programming it with ADSIProg, and 
WOOHOO!  It
 worked!  My previously impermeable Vista 350 is now Asterisk-ADSI capable!
 
 THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!
 
 There are several others on this list that will be just as happy to hear
 this!
 
 Now, that doesn't solve your problem, but I don't have a 480 to walk you
 through it.  Tim Clark has already replied to your message, and he has a
 480.  I hope he can help you out!
 
 -wade
 
 
   The unlock procedure is hilarious.
  
   Hit options.
   Choose Time/Date
   Set the time to Jan 1 12:00am
   Hit done
   Hit done
   Hit options
   Hit Mute
   A display giving the CPE ID and other stuff will appear
   QUICKLY press the # key
  
   It should reset.  All programs will be gone and the directory/caller
   list/called list/softkeys will all be cleared.
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SIP and NAT

2003-03-21 Thread denon
I'm having some problems getting an ATA186 behind NAT working.  When I had 
it on the same subnet as the Asterisk server, it worked fine.  Now Ive 
taken the ATA on the road with me, and it's behind a Dlink router+firewall, 
doing NAT.  I pick it up, hear a dialtone .. the firewall on the asterisk 
side presently has everything open to this subnet, so I know that's not 
really an issue. (what needs to be open, though?)

Here's what the * server is giving me in SIP debug, though:

9 headers, 0 lines
Interface is eth0
IP Address is 1.0.0.1
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 192.168.0.150 : 5060 (non-NAT)
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.150:5060
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=6b5fab60
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0
Suggestions?  (IPs have been changed to protect the innocent)

Thanks for any help you can give -- I was sort of relying on using this 
while I'm on the road.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SIP and NAT - more

2003-03-21 Thread denon
Oh, and yes, the * is current as of a few days ago .. so it should have 
that new SIP code mark was working on a while back.

Thanks

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP and NAT - more

2003-03-21 Thread denon
Thanks -- I didn't realize that needed to be set.  It works now, but 
there's a horrible echo on the sip client side. (I dont know about the 
other side, as I havent called any humans yet :)

I don't, however, hear an echo when I call voicemail or such .. so I'm 
assuming it's something with the bridging?

I didn't know of any echo cans that need to be enabled for sip - are there? 
The PSTN line its connecting out on has echocan and whenbridged enabled.

Here's an example of one of the pstns, they're all built the same, using an 
Adtran 750 channel bank with current firmware (actually, the last release, 
which was considered the most stable by most):
context = pstn1
signalling = fxs_ks
amaflags = documentation
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
adsi=yes
channel = 17

Ideas? Thanks

At 09:53 PM 3/21/2003 -0600, you wrote:
have you tried nat=1 in your friend declaration?  I notice in your dump it
says non-NAT
Mark

On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, denon wrote:

 Oh, and yes, the * is current as of a few days ago .. so it should have
 that new SIP code mark was working on a while back.

 Thanks

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ITSP requested features?

2003-03-16 Thread denon
At 01:58 PM 3/16/2003 -0500, you wrote:

What else appeals to you?  Voicemail delivery via SMTP?
Yes, but most pbx users will most likely be doing this on their own, so I 
don't know how important it is.


Automatic call
forwarding to a PSTN number when your SIP client isn't registered?
Sure, but again, how many PBXs go down for long periods of time? Generally 
that type of routing would be done with an extensions.conf, even though 
it's inefficient to take the stream in, and route it back again. .


 Call
record billing statements with custom accounting codes?
Nah, in the pbx. .


 IAX protocol
support?
Yep. IAX2 preferably.


911 emergency call routing?  Unlimited international calls?
Unlimited International would be nice, though I don't know how economical 
it would be.  How about unlimited to certain countries ..

Keep in mind, you're not the only kid on the block .. lots of people 
already working to implement IAX support, so you'll need something unique - 
whether it be price or unlimited international, etc.

denon

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name

2003-03-13 Thread denon
I still like my original idea, SVP - Streamlined Voice Protocol.

I think the trick to naming IAX2, is to encourage the thought of 
streamlined and efficiency.  If people want a feature-rich and bloated 
protocol, they'll run H.323, SIP, etc .. IAX is all about performance and 
resource utilization.

denon

At 09:19 AM 3/13/2003 -0600, you wrote:
What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as:

Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE)

TASTE is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to SIP.
Is it took hoaky?
Mark

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fax support?

2003-03-03 Thread denon
Nope, that would require simulating the a fax dsp, or such.  You can, 
however, route a call to a certain zap port when a CNG tone is detected.

At 01:36 PM 3/3/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Thanks Martin, I'll set it up tonight. Can asterisk receive the incomming 
fax and store it to local disk with email notification?

Gene

-Original Message-
From: Martin Pycko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 3/3/2003 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax support?


let's say you have one T1 span configured like this
in zapata.conf
context=incoming
group = 1
channel = 1-23
then in extensions.conf
[incoming]
exten = fax,1,Dial,Zap/25  #FXS port that fax is plugged to
exten = _X,1,... (the rest)
when asterisk detects fax tones on incoming call it's going
to look for fax extension in the channel context. If it finds
it then the fax call is going to be routed according to
the fax extension rule.
regards
Martin
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Gene Kochanowsky wrote:

 Is there any way to receive and send faxes using a T100 card? 
If so how is it done?

 Gene Kochanowsky
 Solution Sciences, Inc.

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users