[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread tonny

I have a SB3 that I run in Wireless mode.

Are there any mayor sound differences to go by wire instead?

What are your experiences in this area?


-- 
tonny

tonny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread pkfox

tonny;345109 Wrote: 
 I have a SB3 that I run in Wireless mode.
 
 Are there any mayor sound differences to go by wire instead?
 
 What are your experiences in this area?

Hi there, I didn't have any sound issues when using wireless - I
changed to wired because the SB/TP occassionaly lost the connection to
the router


-- 
pkfox

When the going gets weird - the weird turn pro. Hunter S Thompson

pkfox's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5346
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread opaqueice

tonny;345109 Wrote: 
 I have a SB3 that I run in Wireless mode.
 
 Are there any mayor sound differences to go by wire instead?
 
 What are your experiences in this area?

Apart from dropouts (i.e. when your wireless network isn't working or
isn't fast enough), there is no difference in sound.

The SB receives the data in packets which it later decodes - it makes
no difference whether those packets are transmitted by wire, wireless,
or donkey so long as they arrive fast enough.


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread tonny

A hifi dealer in Gothenburg claims that the SB is quite sensitive and
can sound like a ”good” MP3-player when using wireless.. and like a
£500 CD-player wired.

I have not done any testing’s myself. Planning on using my SB3 as a
Wireless bridge and connect my NAS direct to SB3. I Guess that the SB3
and NAS will communicate directly then.


-- 
tonny

tonny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread Mark Lanctot

tonny;345173 Wrote: 
 A hifi dealer in Gothenburg claims that the SB is quite sensitive and
 can sound like a ”good” MP3-player when using wireless.. and like a
 £500 CD-player wired.

Does this same dealer also believe his Word files will be worse when
they arrive at his computer via a wireless network rather than wired?

He's demonstrating a fundamental lack of understanding of how the
system works as the files are transmitted as computer sound files
(FLAC, WAV, MP3 etc.) to the Squeezebox which decodes them and then
plays them back.  It doesn't matter one bit how the files are
transmitted, just like your computer files won't be altered when you
send them to another computer.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Make it so it doesn't suck is a good design target, but hard to
implement - Michael Herger

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Start Small or Jump to Transporter?

2008-09-29 Thread stof77

If you want to go for NAS,

Netgear  Synology are the one, IMO, to check.

The advantage if you install Squeezecenter on a NAS, is that you don't
have to run a computer when listening to music (invesstment at start
but in the lon run less electricity bill compared to a PC).

The drawback is a NAS isn't very much powerfull but for my own needs it
is ok, so far I've got a little more than 1 / 12 songs (both
FLAC  Mp3)  I can still manage ok  I think I can go further.

Things to kept in mind are :

- a complete scan of your musical will last about 1 hour (with the
amount of files above),
- using the web interface with SC installed on the NAS is slow, that's
for sure (BUt you don't realy need it for listening to music)
- If you go for it, be sure to choose one powerfull enough (cpu 500 Mhz
or +,  128 Mo Ram.
After you have to calculate how much Go you need for your musical
collection (present  future  maybe, highly recommended a backup
solution),

NAS usually can handle up to 4 internal HDs, with some more space
available on USB2 /or esata connections.

Will end with a link for Synology Nas  SC installation instruction 
tutorial, thanx to fliflip work :
http://oinkzwurgl.org/ssods/


-- 
stof77

HiFi : SqueezeBox3, SSODS 3.0beta12 / SC 7.0.1 - NAS Synology DS
127+.128, NAD C320BEE, Triangle AlteaESW.

HC : DVD Samsung, Denon AVR-1908 (couplé au NAD), ALteaESW + 2 vielles
biblios Jamo, VP Infocus SP5700.

stof77's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12949
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51311

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread tonny

I think he is quite technical, in fact he is electrical engineer and
worked with heavy HiFi gear for more than 20 years.

I’m computer guy myself, and I know what you mean concerning the TCP,
protocols and so on..

But, I think this dealer means that the conditions concerning SB
DA-conversion could be affected when running in wireless mode. Some
DAC:s are quite sensitive to PSU-quality.


-- 
tonny

tonny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Toslink question: glass vs. plastic

2008-09-29 Thread Phil Leigh

jhm731;343907 Wrote: 
 If you're listening to a stock PSU in your TacT RCS, you have no clue
 how good it can sound.
 
 On the subject of glass vs plastic Toslink see:
 
 www.lifatec.com/toslink4.html

JHM - is this a reference to the Aberdeen replacement PSU?
I can imagine a replacement PSU might benefit TACT ADC's and DAC's but
I don't have any of those. If there were any effect on the SPDIF, It
would be in the form of noise/jitter - both of which my DAC chain
rejects pretty well.

I think I've mentioned before that running the TACT in bypass (flat)
mode sounds identical to unplugging it completely from my system...
YMMV


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods)- Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x
LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters,
Kimber  Chord cables
Outdoors: Boombox+Creative Sub (If I remember to turn it on...)

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=52817

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread Mark Lanctot

I think some audiophiles just get scared when they hear the word
wireless and think it will automatically impact sound quality without
actually doing any listening tests.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Make it so it doesn't suck is a good design target, but hard to
implement - Michael Herger

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread SuperQ

opaqueice;345170 Wrote: 
 The SB receives the data in packets which it later decodes - it makes no
 difference whether those packets are transmitted by wire, wireless, or
 donkey so long as they arrive fast enough.

I'm a big fan of 'IPoAC'
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers).  It won't make
it sound any different tho.


-- 
SuperQ

SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread SuperQ

tonny;345173 Wrote: 
 A hifi dealer in Gothenburg claims that the SB is quite sensitive and
 can sound like a ”good” MP3-player when using wireless.. and like a
 £500 CD-player wired.
 
 I have not done any testing’s myself. Planning on using my SB3 as a
 Wireless bridge and connect my NAS direct to SB3. I Guess that the SB3
 and NAS will communicate directly then.

The hifi dealer is a fool.  It doesn't make any difference.

Are you running SqueezeCenter on your NAS?


-- 
SuperQ

SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread JJZolx

Some people will claim that the RFI using wireless can be detrimental to
the sound.

http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/digital/messages/14/140731.html

 A PC creates a nightmare of RFI. I would never connect one directly to
 my audio system. Instead, I would look for devices that isolate the PC
 from the audio system. For example, the Ethernet DACs (eg, Squeezebox,
 Linn DS) will provide isolation *provided that they are connected via
 an Ethernet cable*. A wireless (Wi-Fi) connection just introduces more
 RFI. But a wired Ethernet connection has an isolation transformer that
 helps keep the RFI out of your system.


-- 
JJZolx

Jim

JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread Themis

I made the test (long ago) : no difference whatsoever, on any material.
The contrary would have been -really- amazing.


-- 
Themis

SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus

Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread tonny

Yes, I'm running SqueezeCenter on a QNAP 109.

This HiFi dealer also can hear differences between diffent NAS:es too..
:-0


-- 
tonny

tonny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread Themis

tonny;345266 Wrote: 
 This HiFi dealer also can hear differences between diffent NAS:es too..
 :-0oO 

Next step : listening to differences between hard disk storage
locations...
Final step : does ipV6 sounds better than ipV4 on a SB ? :D


-- 
Themis

SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus

Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread opaqueice

tonny;345173 Wrote: 
 A hifi dealer in Gothenburg claims that the SB is quite sensitive and
 can sound like a #8221;good#8221; MP3-player when using wireless..
 and like a £500 CD-player wired.

Has he done a blind test?  We had someone on this forum - sleepysurf, I
think - who swore the wired quality was vastly superior to wireless. 
One afternoon he had his wife switch back and forth without telling
him, and he tried to guess.  He failed utterly (4/10 right or
something).

tonny;345187 Wrote: 
 
 But, I think this dealer means that the conditions concerning SB
 DA-conversion could be affected when running in wireless mode. Some
 DAC:s are quite sensitive to PSU-quality.

That is theoretically possible.  So is the opposite (the wireless
sounds better than wired due to differing CPU etc. utilization).  Both
are extremely unlikely, and it's very easy to find out for sure if it
matters (just do a blind listening test).

androidtopp;345250 Wrote: 
 
 To give him the benefit of the doubt, maybe he's assuming that wireless
 will drop out more, since it'll have more discarded packets than a wired
 connection?

Dropped packets that can't be re-sent don't make a subtle difference in
the sound.  They make it stop.

 Now, maybe if the SC - SB connection was UDP (opaqueice, I always
 thought this was Universal Datagram Protocol, but maybe the D is for
 Donkey?), and here I am assuming it's not...can't remember off top of
 my head, but I can't imagine it is...I can see where wireless would be
 problematic. But so would wired, most likely, depending on how much
 bandwidth you're needing.

I think it's TCP/IP (which stands for Transported Completely by
Parakeet).

JJZolx;345258 Wrote: 
 Some people will claim that the RFI using wireless can be detrimental to
 the sound.
 
 http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/digital/messages/14/140731.html

They call it audio -asylum- for a reason.  But anyway, if that's the
problem you'd better unplug your router, not just go to a wired
connection.  And your cordless phones and those of your neighbors, and
all the radio stations within 30 miles or so.


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread androidtopp

opaqueice;345280 Wrote: 
 Dropped packets that can't be re-sent don't make a subtle difference in
 the sound.  They make it stop.

Exactly. Which is why I don't think this is what the guy means. I don't
think you need to be an audiophile to tell when the network can't keep
up.

tonny;345266 Wrote: 
 This HiFi dealer also can hear differences between diffent NAS:es too..
 :-0

No, this is definitely true. But it's more a difference in playback
speed. If the data is on the *outside* rings of the hard drive
platters, further from the spindle, then it gets read faster - at a
constant angular velocity, you cover more distance per unit time on the
outside tracks, as linear velocity is faster towards the edge of the
plarter than it is at the center of the platter.

So if you don't want your music to sound faster or slower than
originally intended, you should try to keep your data in the middle of
the platters. He probably knows of some NAS devices that have a special
algorithm that does just this.


-- 
androidtopp

My SB3 is the most expensive part of my stereo. So I'm not going to brag
about it.

http://www.last.fm/user/androidtopp

androidtopp's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19681
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread JJZolx

Trust me on this one... trolling in this forum is unnecessary.  They
jump into the boat on their own.


-- 
JJZolx

Jim

JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread DeVerm

JJZolx;345258 Wrote: 
 Some people will claim that the RFI using wireless can be detrimental to
 the sound.
 
 http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/digital/messages/14/140731.html
 
 A PC creates a nightmare of RFI. I would never connect one directly to
 my audio system. Instead, I would look for devices that isolate the PC
 from the audio system. For example, the Ethernet DACs (eg, Squeezebox,
 Linn DS) will provide isolation *provided that they are connected via
 an Ethernet cable*. A wireless (Wi-Fi) connection just introduces more
 RFI. But a wired Ethernet connection has an isolation transformer that
 helps keep the RFI out of your system.

Okay, I read a lot of bull in this thread but I just can't let this
pass without jumping into the boat ;-)

RFI means it's nasty stuff at radio frequencies. Now please someone
explain me how a transformer can block that. The unshielded ethernet
cable will actually introduce -more- RFI into the SB compared to using
a wifi-link. Maybe they mean that by not using wifi this wifi-signal
doesn't get into the box? Well, maybe if you throw your wifi-router in
the trash plus those of all your neighbours etc. because as long as the
SB isn't in a Faraday cage that stuff will all get in there so better
put it to use.

Can I come out of the boat now? ;-)
Nick.


-- 
DeVerm

DeVerm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18104
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread chill

First let me say that I categorically do NOT believe that wired sounds
any different from wireless in an SB2 or SB3.

However, I should point out my own experience in re-housing an SB2 in a
chassis that contains my DIY pre-amp.  Being in the same chassis, the
SB2 circuit boards and the op amps in my pre-amp ended up somewhat
closer together than would normally be the case for discretely housed
units.  In this configuration I'm afraid I definitely COULD hear the
impact of the wireless connection.  The music sounded the same,
obviously, but during very quiet periods (eg the gaps between tracks) I
could distinctly hear a very quiet fizzing static sound corresponding to
the SB2 buffer refilling over the wifi link.

I was able to reduce this noise to inaudible levels by moving the SB2
circuit board no more than a foot or so from the op amps.

When I connected via cable (from a nearby homeplug), the wifi card was
unpowered, and the static noise was totally absent.

Given this experience, I would not consider it completely out of the
question that a wireless SB3 placed directly next to the op amp section
in a separate pre-amp could induce some static noise.

I hesitated to make this post, as it might give ammunition to a point
of view I don't agree with.  My own DIY configuration was definitely
not a normal setup, and it should perhaps serve more as a warning to
DIY builders than to users of the conventional off-the-shelf units.


-- 
chill

chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 - Wireless or Wired

2008-09-29 Thread DeVerm

chill;345383 Wrote: 
 First let me say that I categorically do NOT believe that wired sounds
 any different from wireless in an SB2 or SB3.
 
 However, I should point out my own experience in re-housing an SB2 in a
 chassis that contains my DIY pre-amp.  Being in the same chassis, the
 SB2 [...]
 quiet fizzing static sound corresponding to the SB2 buffer refilling
 over the wifi link.
 [...]
 I hesitated to make this post, as it might give ammunition to a point
 of view I don't agree with.  My own DIY configuration was definitely
 not a normal setup, and it should perhaps serve more as a warning to
 DIY builders than to users of the conventional off-the-shelf units.

Don't hesitate ;-)

You could have experienced direct RFI from the SB to your pre-amp but
more often this noise is transferred via a shared power-supply or any
cabling or ground-connection between the two (even though moving items
around makes a change indicating direct RF...) Read 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequency_interference to find out
how misleading RFI can be. Both situations can be resolved but you need
to determine where the problem is first. Easiest is to connect SB to
it's own PSU. If that helps you need to filter the DC. If there's no
change, disconnect audio-link between SB and pre-amp (if that helps you
need a choke in that cable) If it's really direct RF, you need to do
some RF shielding.

If it's RF via power-supply, you need to block it using a
ferrite-bead-coil and some capacitors. This filter is very easy to do
as what you want to pass is DC and what you want to block is RF which
is miles apart. I can give specifics on how to build that; parts only
cost a couple of bucks.

If it's direct RF you need to create two compartments within the
housing. Separation plus housing itself needs to be metal or cover the
inside with spray-glue  aluminum-foil or better, a conducting paint
that's available in DIY spray cans. Read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RF_shielding

In my own RF designs I put a small ceramic capacitor (1 nF) across Vcc
and ground pins of every IC/chip as close to the chip as possible on
the PCB. Many of those might not be needed but some are and they are
cheap enough to do this for home-build projects. A couple of those
added across the power-supply pins of your op-amps (assuming you use
op-amps) can be all the cure you need. Cut the leads as short as
possible and solder it across the pins directly on the underside of the
PCB.
If you make your own PCB's, make sure that more than 50% of copper
surface after etching is ground and decouple DC for RF at every IC.

good luck,
Nick.


-- 
DeVerm

DeVerm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18104
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53207

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles