Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
right, my last modification post, I have found the solution, for me at least. It is SBT out of the box settings with buffer at default of 2 ie tt -b 2, now everything sounds correct. of course, this is how it was designed to be used. so with TT3.0 the sound is cleaned up and we have the original balance, rhythm and timing. previously i had been using buffer of 3200, but this threw it out of balance. so, I have beeen chasing my tail round in circles, but there you go. can SBT be changed to sound better by changing priorities ? i am not sure because something always suffers, as one thing is tweaked something else goes out of balance. I am referencing a clocked Linn Karik 3 and happy that SBT is comparable if not better. talk about a thread killer -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK;680765 Wrote: ps this is not a wind up, i really am using these settings LOL!!! :D :D [image: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a270/RODARID/HIFI/priosettingstoolbox30122011.jpg] Good choice, 'cause I won't have to change in my excel sheet ;) -- NoRoDa NoRoDa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
NoRoDa;680771 Wrote: LOL!!! :D :D [image: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a270/RODARID/HIFI/priosettingstoolbox30122011.jpg] Good choice, 'cause I won't have to change in my excel sheet ;) remember the buffer size of 2, it is critical to the default settings. -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
I just loaded TT2.0 on top of TT 3.0, ran them through the Umax 22 super-compiler and set the buffer to 5,675,901..I can't believe how good it sounds now! -- Stilly77 Stilly77's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43680 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
Stilly77;680773 Wrote: I just loaded TT2.0 on top of TT 3.0, ran them through the Umax 22 super-compiler and set the buffer to 5,675,901..I can't believe how good it sounds now! the new years resolution didn't last long then !!! -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Volume Control
AndrewFG;679354 Wrote: Is there a way to setup the Transporter's volume control so that its analog outputs are variable volume but its digital output is fixed (at maximum)? Don't take this as gospel, but I have a hazy recollection that this used to be possible but the facility was removed a long time ago in order to make room in the limited firmware memory for some other feature (possibly the digital loopback?). So if you're prepared to run a really old firmware, it may be possible. Does anyone else remember this change, or is my memory failing me? -- cliveb Transporter - ATC SCM100A cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=92565 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
play at buffer 2, SBT factory settings + SBGK mods, thats all folks. PIDJIVEALSA=`pidof jive_alsa` #def: 45 #PIDJIVE=`pidof jive` #def: - PIDSIRQTASKLET0=`pidof sirq-tasklet/0` #def: 89 interrupt handler - should be higher then interrupts PIDSIRQHRTIMER=`pidof sirq-hrtimer/0` #def: 40 htimer of rtkernel - should be also very high PIDWATCHDOG=`pidof watchdog/0` #def: 99 PIDLOADAVG=`pidof loadavg` #def: 50 PIDOFPSXCPUTMR=`pidof posixcputmr/0`#def: 98 PIDIRQ47=`pidof IRQ-47` #def: 40 SPDIF -- any impact? PIDIRQ14=`pidof IRQ-14` #def: 40 PIDIRQ37=`pidof IRQ-37` #def: 40 USB can be put very low PIDIRQ34=`pidof IRQ-34` #def: 90 dma for processor ? PIDSIRNETTX=`pidof sirq-net-tx/0` #def: 40 network transmit PIDSIRNETRX=`pidof sirq-net-rx/0` #def: 40 network receive PIDEVENTS=`pidof events/0` #def: 1 PIDKRC=`pidof krcupreemptd`#def: 1 ##def 40 PIDSIRQH=`pidof sirq-high/0` PIDSIRQT=`pidof sirq-timer/0` PIDSIRQB=`pidof sirq-block/0` PIDSIRQS=`pidof sirq-sched/0` PIDSIRQR=`pidof sirq-rcu/0` PIDIRQ10=`pidof IRQ-10` PIDIRQ42=`pidof IRQ-42` PIDIRQ41=`pidof IRQ-41` PIDIRQ22=`pidof IRQ-22` PIDIRQ57=`pidof IRQ-57` PIDIRQ33=`pidof IRQ-33` PIDIRQ17=`pidof IRQ-17` PIDIRQ122=`pidof IRQ-122` PIDIRQ123=`pidof IRQ-123` PIDIRQ7=`pidof IRQ-7` PIDIRQ102=`pidof IRQ-102` PIDIRQ8=`pidof IRQ-8` PIDIRQ11=`pidof IRQ-11` PIDIRQ12=`pidof IRQ-12` PIDIRQ25=`pidof IRQ-25` PIDIRQ45=`pidof IRQ-45` PRIOJIVEALSA=45 #PRIOJIVE=0 PRIOSIRQTASKLET0=89 PRIOSIRQHRTIMER=40 PRIOWATCHDOG=0 PRIOLOADAVG=50 PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR=98 PRIOIRQ47=40 PRIOIRQ14=40 PRIOIRQ37=0 PRIOIRQ34=90 PRIOSIRNETTX=40 PRIOSIRNETRX=40 PRIOIRQ10=0 PRIOIRQ42=40 PRIOIRQ41=0 PRIOIRQ22=0 PRIOIRQ57=0 PRIOIRQ33=0 PRIOIRQ17=40 PRIOIRQ122=0 PRIOIRQ123=40 PRIOIRQ7=0 PRIOIRQ102=40 PRIOIRQ8=0 PRIOIRQ11=0 PRIOIRQ12=0 PRIOIRQ25=0 PRIOIRQ45=0 echo PID - Jive-Alsa: $PIDJIVEALSA $LOG2 echo PRIO: $PRIOJIVEALSA $LOG2 chrt -f -p $PRIOJIVEALSA $PIDJIVEALSA$LOG2 21 #chrt -f -p $PRIOJIVE $PIDJIVE /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRQTASKLET0 $PIDSIRQTASKLET0/dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRQHRTIMER $PIDSIRQHRTIMER /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOWATCHDOG $PIDWATCHDOG/dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOLOADAVG $PIDLOADAVG /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR $PIDOFPSXCPUTMR /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ47 $PIDIRQ47 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ14 $PIDIRQ14 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ37 $PIDIRQ37 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ34 $PIDIRQ34 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRNETTX $PIDSIRNETTX/dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRNETRX $PIDSIRNETRX/dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ10 $PIDIRQ10 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ42 $PIDIRQ42 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ41 $PIDIRQ41 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ22 $PIDIRQ22 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ57 $PIDIRQ57 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ33 $PIDIRQ33 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ17 $PIDIRQ17 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ122 $PIDIRQ122 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ123 $PIDIRQ123 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ7 $PIDIRQ7 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ102 $PIDIRQ102 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ8 $PIDIRQ8 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ11 $PIDIRQ11 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ12 $PIDIRQ12 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ25 $PIDIRQ25 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ45 $PIDIRQ45 /dev/null 21 -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
I do not understand what you mean 'SBT out of the box settings' as you are following this with instructions for TT3.0 settings '...buffer at default of 2 ie tt -b 2' Do you really mean SBT with TT3.0 rather than out of the box. Slightly confused... SBGK;680765 Wrote: right, my last modification post, I have found the solution, for me at least. It is SBT out of the box settings with buffer at default of 2 ie tt -b 2, now everything sounds correct. of course, this is how it was designed to be used. so with TT3.0 the sound is cleaned up and we have the original balance, rhythm and timing. previously i had been using buffer of 3200, but this threw it out of balance. i liked the SBT out of the box with buffer at 3200, but could not understand why it was so bass heavy. after trying all sorts of changes, to lift the mid and top end, finally thought that the buffer was the only non standard setting , so tried the default 2 and there it was, music coming out of the SBT. Fantastic. it won't enhance a bad recording, if it is dull it will stay dull, but give it a good cd or hirez then the sound is very good. so no more blaming the SBT, if it sounds crap it is your source or system. so, I have beeen chasing my tail round in circles, but there you go. can SBT be changed to sound better by changing priorities ? i am not sure because something always suffers, as one thing is tweaked something else goes out of balance. I am referencing a clocked Linn Karik 3 and happy that SBT is comparable if not better. talk about a thread killer and best of all for the luddites out there, no more confusing settings to worry about praise be to Klaus 2012 is better already ps this is not a wind up, i really am using these settings -- bimboy bimboy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1505 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
bimboy;680791 Wrote: I do not understand what you mean 'SBT out of the box settings' as you are following this with instructions for TT3.0 settings '...buffer at default of 2 ie tt -b 2' Do you really mean SBT with TT3.0 rather than out of the box. Slightly confused... TT3.0 then change priorities to default settings as per spreadsheet, then change buffer to 2 -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK;680795 Wrote: PRIOJIVEALSA=45 #PRIOJIVE=0 PRIOSIRQTASKLET0=89 PRIOSIRQHRTIMER=40 PRIOWATCHDOG=99 PRIOLOADAVG=50 PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR=98 PRIOIRQ47=40 PRIOIRQ14=40 PRIOIRQ37=40 PRIOIRQ34=90 PRIOSIRNETTX=40 PRIOSIRNETRX=40 I believe that it's a fair thing to say that what these last many pages in the thread has been about is the (small?) portion of the TT3.0 that has to to with the priority setting in the tt-file in /usr/bin. The values in this quote are replacing the original values like this. That is the only change, and you also changed now the buffer size. (From TT3.0 default 3400 to Logitech default 2) PRIOJIVEALSA=96 #PRIOJIVE=0 PRIOSIRQTASKLET0=97 PRIOSIRQHRTIMER=98 PRIOWATCHDOG=30 PRIOLOADAVG=97 PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR=99 PRIOIRQ47=40 PRIOIRQ14=40 PRIOIRQ37=40 PRIOIRQ34=98 PRIOSIRNETTX=95 PRIOSIRNETRX=95 How much this affects the overall sound from the SBT differs a lot from person to person. From 'praise the lord' to 'huh?' and opinions that are totally different about one particular setting. When the same priority setting can be described as dark and mellow by some and light and harsh by others, it's a good time to think about how much of this is in our heads. And tomorrow we will have yet another final setting from SBGK. ;) Instead of trying out all these fina lsetting or waiting for the final final setting, I'm waiting for the TT4.0 from soundcheck. :) -- NoRoDa NoRoDa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please help: MF Trivista DAC just died - Repair or Replace?
Hello all and happy prosperous new year wishes to everyone! My first post here so please be gentle...although I do lurk a lot! My new year hasn't got off to a brilliant start. My beloved Musical Fidelity Trivista DAC died this morning after 9 yrs of rock solid service with the left channel no longer outputting a signal. It sounded superb last night after I had been messing with my SB Touch and Soundcheck's TT3.0 tools. As I see it I have three options: 1. Get the Trivista DAC repaired by MF 2. Use MF's Fine-tuning service to get the DAC repaired as well as overhauled and some improvements made (cost 600GBP). 3. Replace the DAC altogether with something new and better(?) I would be really grateful for advice from you all on these options - especially option 2 (if anyone has experience of it). I have been very happy with the Trivista DAC and the only other DAC I seriously considered in the past 9 years has been the Naim DAC. But after a home trial I decided that the Naim DAC wasn't better - just different and that the Trivista gave a more expansive lush sound. In terms of a budget for a new DAC - I'm flexible and able to stretch to around 3,000GBP but for this sort of money I'd hope to get a sound that was substantially better than what the MF Trivista DAC offered - is that possible? I am also willing to buy second-hand (in fact, that is my preferred acquisition route). What DAC's do people suggest I try? Many thanks in advance and now back to listening to the analogue outputs of the SBT - oh the suffering...! Rgds PS: The rest of the system is as follows: -LMS running on a QNAP server -SB Touch with wired ethernet and running TT3.0 -Music First Passive Pre-amplifier -Musical Fidelity A308CR Power Amplifier -KEF Reference 205 speakers -PS Audio Power Plant powering all the devices except the Power amp -- sa3999 sa3999's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52876 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=92708 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
First of all; all the Best for the New Year 2012. Exactly NoRoDa - I also already forecast that; Everyone of us has another plant chain, other source, amplifier and loudspeakers in its acoustic area (very important subject) and reacts differently also depending upon kind of the music on the priorities mentioned. After some reports of others in this forum, my current concern is the im-balance in the left channel of the trebele range with light tendency to an exaggeration with this TT3 suggested low adjusted buffer between 3400 - 4000. Possibly nevertheless the default of 2 could help to obtain a good equal course of the channels-- will thereby in the next meet to play and report. Jacky -- Jacky Jacky's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38257 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
NoRoDa;680805 Wrote: When the same priority setting can be described as dark and mellow by some and light and harsh by others, it's a good time to think about how much of this is in our heads. And tomorrow we will have yet another final setting from SBGK. ;) Instead of trying out all these daily final settings from SBGK or waiting for the final final setting, I'm waiting for the TT4.0 from soundcheck. :) it is in my head because thats where I process sound, but the differences are real. the changes in the last week were all related to trying to lift the sound of the SBT default settings. I have finally done that by going back to the default buffer size. I am now saying that changing SBT priorities does not work from a musical perspective. it might sound better, but is it music ? I don't expect TT4.0 is going to help my system any, maybe some hints on how to optimise the server. hope you continue to find improvements, I am finished. -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
rgro;680761 Wrote: While audiomuze seems to think we're pretentious and silly as hell, I'm actually having quite a bit of fun with this. Well, it's us phools who have the big smile on our faces as we revel in the glorious music of our tweaked (and un-tweaked) systems! Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp - Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK;680808 Wrote: snip hope you continue to find improvements, I am finished. Hmm . . . somehow I doubt it. Actually, I hope you are not! Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp - Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK;680765 Wrote: right, my last modification post, I have found the solution, for me at least. It is SBT out of the box settings with buffer at default of 2 ie tt -b 2, now everything sounds correct. of course, this is how it was designed to be used. so with TT3.0 the sound is cleaned up and we have the original balance, rhythm and timing. previously i had been using buffer of 3200, but this threw it out of balance. i liked the SBT out of the box with buffer at 3200, but could not understand why it was so bass heavy. Actually, as I mentioned in a prior post, I too found the bass somewhat heavy upon first trying both TT3.0 and your settings. However, in my system all I had to do was to back down a bit on my sub's volume (the crossover is already at its minimum of 30Hz) and everything was fine. The question then becomes: Is the heavier bass an artifact of the priority settings (or buffer size) or is it a function of a system with a tendency to enhance bass? Of course, in practical terms all that matters is that one finds a balance that seems right. Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp - Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
guidof;680818 Wrote: Hmm . . . somehow I doubt it. Actually, I hope you are not! Guido F. no really. I am enjoying listening to led zep just now and it sounds v good. I am beginning to think that tweaking the SBT is a bit like adjusting the weight on a record player needle, you can have light and airy or bass heavy, but to get a better overall sound then you need to go elsewhere and spend some money. Also it seems to me that the designers designed the sound to be optimal at the default priorities and buffer size, Soundcheck has done well to remove things that affect the sound eg WLAN, IR etc, but I don't think the overall musical sound has been improved by tweaking the priorities and buffers. -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK;680738 Wrote: I am going to settle on SBT base settings, hard to beat for sheer musicality and emotional involvement with the music. Bingo! Exactly the reason I'm sticking with them. Can I get an AMEN? :-) Happy New Year everyone... RG -- RGibran RGibran's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10220 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please help: MF Trivista DAC just died - Repair or Replace?
In principle, and especially if you are ready to spend up to £3000, I would recommend going the new DAC route over refurbishing a 9-year old unit. Which one is, of course, a function of your musical tastes as well as your other equipment. Good hunting! (Not an entirely bad way to start the new year). Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp - Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=92708 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Please help: MF Trivista DAC just died - Repair or Replace?
Hello, I also have a Trivista DAC which I have been happily using for the last 6 years. I have recently tried a few more modern DACS, including Naim, and have not found one that is the equal of my Trivista. Although several years old, the DAC used in the Trivista is a 24 bit 96/192KHz which is able to handle any modern Hi-res file. My recommendation would be to have your Trivista repaired. But if you have a friendly dealer near to you, why not try out some alternative DAC's for yourself. Good luck! p.s. I have come across an alternative repair service to that offered by MF(I have no affiliation or connection and no experience of using them!) : http://www.jsaudiorepairs.co.uk. --- My System: Squeezebox Touch : Soundcheck Toolbox 3.0 : ethernet wired Musical Fidelity Trivista 21 DAC Musical Fidelity KW550 integrated amp Dynaudio Special 25 speakers Chord interconnects and speaker cabling -- bimboy bimboy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1505 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=92708 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
RGibran;680824 Wrote: Bingo! Exactly the reason I'm sticking with them. Can I get an AMEN? :-) Happy New Year everyone... RG Oh, so how to get to this base(OOTB) setting. Is it to just change the tt file with a new set of values. Can someone pls give those default settings. -- lake_eleven lake_eleven's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48979 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
guidof;680822 Wrote: Actually, as I mentioned in a prior post, I too found the bass somewhat heavy upon first trying both TT3.0 and your settings. However, in my system all I had to do was to back down a bit on my sub's volume (the crossover is already at its minimum of 30Hz) and everything was fine. The question then becomes: Is the heavier bass an artifact of the priority settings (or buffer size) or is it a function of a system with a tendency to enhance bass? Of course, in practical terms all that matters is that one finds a balance that seems right. Guido F. Guido---just curious, have you tried the GuidoF settings with the buffer size set to 2? -- rgro Rg System information Main: PS Audio Quintet Vortexbox Touch (wired) via optical Rega DAC LFD LE IV Signature amp VA Mozart Grands REL Acoustics R305 sub. Home Theatre: Duet/SBR (Wired) Pioneer VSX 919 Energy Take 5 Classic 5.1. SBS 7.7.1 r33751 on a Vortexbox Appliance, V 2.0. Touch w/Hardware V.5. Touch: FW 7.7.1 r9558. Duet: FW 7.7.1 r9557. rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
rgro;680850 Wrote: Guido---just curious, have you tried the GuidoF settings with the buffer size set to 2? Yes, I have. The results were not encouraging. However, I also tried the latest (01-01-2012?) SBGK's. Initial impression in my next post. Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp - Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK: I think that with your latest settings you're on to something. I tried the SBT priorities + TT3.0 + Buffer 2 and my first impression is that the music is presented more naturally; the flow is more effortless; there is greater detail, but without losing the music's gestalt and drive. I have a rather mediocre live recording of the Guarneri's excellent performances of Mozart's viola quintets, which is a test case both for tonal balance (the viola needs to be distinguished easily within the mix) and for soundstage (placement of mikes for public performance clearly having a deleterious effect). These latest settings seem to have achieved the most believable presentation of these pieces I've heard so far in my system. So buffer size really seems to make a difference . . . Will listen more and report further, but in the meantime thanks again for your dogged pursuit of perfection! Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp - Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
lake_eleven;680848 Wrote: Oh, so how to get to this base(OOTB) setting. Is it to just change the tt file with a new set of values. Can someone pls give those default settings. try post 855, previous page -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK;680823 Wrote: ...but I don't think the overall musical sound has been improved by tweaking the priorities and buffers. I still like your original (i.e. not there anymore) p48 settings. Unfortunately they have that burr in the HFs (here). There's no way I can relate those settings to any of the more current ones...thought I could keep the good parts and tune out the bad...my life will be too short for that I bet... Haven't tried today's settings yet. Yes, buffer size does seem to matter, at least here, when it comes to smoothness. Strangely though, like I mentioned yesterday, just bumping the buffer up to some sizes is much *worse* than some sizes of smaller buffers. Somewhere some Logitech employee is drunk with laughter. I know I would be if somebody online was trying to figger out my RT code setup... -- cfraser cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
cfraser;680871 Wrote: I still like your original (i.e. not there anymore) p48 settings. Unfortunately they have that burr in the HFs (here). There's no way I can relate those settings to any of the more current ones...thought I could keep the good parts and tune out the bad...my life will be too short for that I bet... Haven't tried today's settings yet. Yes, buffer size does seem to matter, at least here, when it comes to smoothness. Strangely though, like I mentioned yesterday, just bumping the buffer up to some sizes is much *worse* than some sizes of smaller buffers. Somewhere some Logitech employee is drunk with laughter. I know I would be if somebody online was trying to figger out my RT code setup... there is no logic to why 2 works, it certainly isn't because it is smooth in the way that 4000 is smoother than 3200. The only thing I can think of is this is the setting that SBT was designed for, I have tried 16384 after reading a previous post by Soundcheck and the sound is not good. 2 just works with the default settings and TT3.0 - very nice, for me anyway. -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
guidof;680858 Wrote: SBGK: I think that with your latest settings you're on to something. I tried the SBT priorities + TT3.0 + Buffer 2 and my first impression is that the music is presented more naturally; the flow is more effortless; there is greater detail, but without losing the music's gestalt and drive. I have a rather mediocre live recording of the Guarneri's excellent performances of Mozart's viola quintets, which is a test case both for tonal balance (the viola needs to be distinguished easily within the mix) and for soundstage (placement of mikes for public performance clearly having a deleterious effect). These latest settings seem to have achieved the most believable presentation of these pieces I've heard so far in my system. So buffer size really seems to make a difference . . . Will listen more and report further, but in the meantime thanks again for your dogged pursuit of perfection! Guido F. sounds encouraging, must suit your system I am no longer looking at getting anything better out of the SBT, have moved on to optimising the output level from the dac to minimise the effect of any noise. dac manual says sound and noise are the 2 ouputs from the dac, noise is fixed so to minimise the effect the idea is to drive a higher line output ie use attenuation, i think I can do this in the preamp as the input levels can be adjusted. new to me, probably old hat to you guys. -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
The buffer has been at 3400 since TT 2.0, because it sounds better there. You know it does, but you tune your system to your taste and listening level by increasing it, only to once again move away from true 'improved sound'. Why not try moving your speakers out away from the wall a few more inches if you need to reduce the bass? RG -- RGibran RGibran's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10220 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
RGibran;680886 Wrote: The buffer has been at 3400 since TT 2.0, because it sounds better there. You know it does, but you tune your system to your taste and listening level by increasing it, only to once again move away from true 'improved sound'. Why not try moving your speakers out away from the wall a few more inches if you need to reduce the bass? RG where does it say to follow my settings ? if 3400 works for you then good. if you are going to comment then it should be from a point of knowledge, which would mean at least giving them a listen to, you would then have to explain why you didn't like the balanced, detailed, engrossing sound. I don't have to tune my system for any other source, so the probability is the issue lay with SBT and TT3.0 and so it proved. -- SBGK SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
SBGK..you no longer have any credibility with me. You've moved your settings all over the place the last week and keep proclaiming every one as best. At this point, your claims don't carry much weight and are no better than anyone that has ever made a tweak of the SBT. keep up the blah, blah, blah, pretty entertaining, but to be taken with a grain of salt. -- Stilly77 Stilly77's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43680 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
ok...how to reinstate TT 3.0 stock?? tt -i says it is already initialized. I want to enable the priority mod which it says is disabled.. going to try that with the buffer at 20k -- TheOctavist VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0/SBGK)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due VentiLink Audio K100 TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
TheOctavist;680905 Wrote: ok...how to reinstate TT 3.0 stock?? Original values i tt-file: PIDJIVEALSA=`pidof jive_alsa` #def: 45 #PIDJIVE=`pidof jive` #def: - PIDSIRQTASKLET0=`pidof sirq-tasklet/0` #def: 89 interrupt handler - should be higher then interrupts PIDSIRQHRTIMER=`pidof sirq-hrtimer/0` #def: 40 htimer of rtkernel - should be also very high PIDWATCHDOG=`pidof watchdog/0` #def: 99 PIDLOADAVG=`pidof loadavg` #def: 50 PIDOFPSXCPUTMR=`pidof posixcputmr/0`#def: 98 PIDIRQ47=`pidof IRQ-47` #def: 40 SPDIF -- any impact? PIDIRQ14=`pidof IRQ-14` #def: 40 PIDIRQ37=`pidof IRQ-37` #def: 40 USB can be put very low PIDIRQ34=`pidof IRQ-34` #def: 90 dma for processor ? PIDSIRNETTX=`pidof sirq-net-tx/0` #def: 40 network transmit PIDSIRNETRX=`pidof sirq-net-rx/0` #def: 40 network receive PRIOJIVEALSA=96 #PRIOJIVE=0 PRIOSIRQTASKLET0=97 PRIOSIRQHRTIMER=98 PRIOWATCHDOG=30 PRIOLOADAVG=97 PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR=99 PRIOIRQ47=40 PRIOIRQ14=40 PRIOIRQ37=40 PRIOIRQ34=98 PRIOSIRNETTX=95 PRIOSIRNETRX=95 echo PID - Jive-Alsa: $PIDJIVEALSA $LOG2 echo PRIO: $PRIOJIVEALSA $LOG2 chrt -f -p $PRIOJIVEALSA $PIDJIVEALSA$LOG2 21 #chrt -f -p $PRIOJIVE $PIDJIVE /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRQTASKLET0 $PIDSIRQTASKLET0/dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRQHRTIMER $PIDSIRQHRTIMER /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOWATCHDOG $PIDWATCHDOG/dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOLOADAVG $PIDLOADAVG /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR $PIDOFPSXCPUTMR /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ47 $PIDIRQ47 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ14 $PIDIRQ14 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ37 $PIDIRQ37 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOIRQ34 $PIDIRQ34 /dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRNETTX $PIDSIRNETTX/dev/null 21 chrt -f -p $PRIOSIRNETRX $PIDSIRNETRX/dev/null 21 } -- NoRoDa NoRoDa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
Stilly77;680897 Wrote: SBGK..you no longer have any credibility with me. You've moved your settings all over the place the last week and keep proclaiming every one as best. At this point, your claims don't carry much weight and are no better than anyone that has ever made a tweak of the SBT. keep up the blah, blah, blah, pretty entertaining, but to be taken with a grain of salt. No need to be upset with someone who is being so generous to share his findings with us. Chill out, man. I've spent some time today doing comparative listening. I was comparing 3 profiles offered by SBGK: 1. The profile from Dec 27 2011 2. The profile from yesterday (Dec 31 2011) 3. Today's profile (Jan 1, 2012) Here are my findings: I was in love for a few days with profile #1 (ever since Dec 27, that is). After trying profile #2 (yesterday's profile) I found it exciting at first, but after prolonged listening started experiencing surprising levels of listening fatigue. Switched back to profile #1, and everything got restored back to its previous magic. Then I switched to profile #3 (today's profile). The sound got exciting again, but without the adverse effects of fatiguing. I liked it a lot, but wanted to compare it with profile #1 (because by this time I've completely ruled out yesterday's profile). Much to my surprise, realized that profile #1 sounds very, very muffled compared to profile #3! I'm staying with profile #3 for now. I haven't experienced fatiguing with it, although it appears much brighter than profile #1. Profile #2 brought considerable and almost unpleasant hardening of the sound, especially in the higher frequencies. Music played though that setting felt like watching a beautiful women under a super bright reflector light -- the contours were very sharp and harshly delineated, to the point of burning one's retina. Not a good long term experience. I'm hoping that today's profile (#3) will be a keeper. It sounds very present, very detailed, my only fear is that it may prove fatiguing in the long run. Anyone has any comments on the validity of this profile when it comes to longer listening sessions? I'm leaning more toward the overall musicality of the sound, even if it's at the expense of precise clinical details. Profile #1 did bring some magic in the area of musicality, and I thought that it was a definite keeper, but now I cannot realistically stay with it, seeing how muffled and fuzzy it sounds when compared to profile #3. Today's profile (#3) does indeed present so many fine details carved in the space very nicely (not as etched as profile #2). Overall, it is very surprising to me the hear such exaggerated differences in the sound quality resulting from such apparent minor tweaking of some low level software parameters. This may be dependent upon the overall level of resolution of one's audio system. I would say that if your system's total cost is around $10,000 and upwards, and if you can't hear any differences between these 3 profiles I've mentioned above, you should definitely sell that system and get some 'turn key' home entertainment audio kit at Best Buy. -- magiccarpetride magiccarpetride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37863 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0
For those who wish to try it, here is the /usr/bin/tt config for all non-essential processes stopped but factory priority values for those that remain. To be used with TT3.0 using following settings: -v -b 2 -k for after the settings file is edited. tt file settings: PIDJIVEALSA=`pidof jive_alsa` #def: 45 #PIDJIVE=`pidof jive` #def: - PIDSIRQTASKLET0=`pidof sirq-tasklet/0` #def: 89 interrupt handler - should be higher then interrupts PIDSIRQHRTIMER=`pidof sirq-hrtimer/0` #def: 40 htimer of rtkernel - should be also very high PIDWATCHDOG=`pidof watchdog/0` #def: 99 PIDLOADAVG=`pidof loadavg` #def: 50 PIDOFPSXCPUTMR=`pidof posixcputmr/0`#def: 98 PIDIRQ47=`pidof IRQ-47` #def: 40 SPDIF -- any impact? PIDIRQ14=`pidof IRQ-14` #def: 40 PIDIRQ37=`pidof IRQ-37` #def: 40 USB can be put very low PIDIRQ34=`pidof IRQ-34` #def: 90 dma for processor ? PIDSIRNETTX=`pidof sirq-net-tx/0` #def: 40 network transmit PIDSIRNETRX=`pidof sirq-net-rx/0` #def: 40 network receive PIDIRQ25=`pidof IRQ-25` PIDIRQ10=`pidof IRQ-10` PIDIRQ42=`pidof IRQ-42` PIDIRQ41=`pidof IRQ-41` PIDIRQ22=`pidof IRQ-22` PIDIRQ57=`pidof IRQ-57` PIDIRQ33=`pidof IRQ-33` PIDIRQ122=`pidof IRQ-122` PIDIRQ17=`pidof IRQ-17` PIDIRQ123=`pidof IRQ-123` PIDIRQ7=`pidof IRQ-7` PIDIRQ102=`pidof IRQ-102` PIDIRQ8=`pidof IRQ-8` PIDIRQ11=`pidof IRQ-11` PIDIRQ12=`pidof IRQ-12` PIDIRQ45=`pidof IRQ-45` PRIOJIVEALSA=45 PRIOSIRQTASKLET0=89 PRIOSIRQHRTIMER=40 PRIOWATCHDOG=0 PRIOLOADAVG=50 PRIODOFPSXCPUTMR=98 PRIOIRQ47=40 PRIOIRQ14=0 PRIOIRQ37=0 PRIOIRQ34=90 PRIOSIRNETTX=40 PRIOSIRNETRX=40 PRIOIRQ25=40 PRIOIRQ10=0 PRIOIRQ42=0 PRIOIRQ41=0 PRIOIRQ22=0 PRIOIRQ57=0 PRIOIRQ33=0 PRIOIRQ122=0 PRIOIRQ17=0 PRIOIRQ123=0 PRIOIRQ7=0 PRIOIRQ102=0 PRIOIRQ8=0 PRIOIRQ11=0 PRIOIRQ12=0 PRIOIRQ45=0 echo PID - Jive-Alsa: $PIDJIVEALSA $LOG2 echo PRIO: $PRIOJIVEALSA $LOG2 chrt -o -p $PRIOWATCHDOG $PIDWATCHDOG/dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ14 $PIDIRQ14 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ37 $PIDIRQ37 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p $PRIOIRQ10 $PIDIRQ10 /dev/null 21 chrt -o -p
