AW: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Isn't weired with Axapta?

[Andrae, Tobias]

Hello George,
hello Rajendra,
 
you are right - in a way. Of course problems like this should be fixed by Microsoft. 
But: This group is not the right place to ask for these corrections. 
Just open the Partnersource, if you are a MS partner, and report this issues in the 
service system.
If you do not have access you may want to report the issue to your business partner. 
ok?
 
Best regards, Tobias

-UrsprÃngliche Nachricht- 
Von: Rajendra Sherikar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Fr 05.11.2004 02:49 
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Betreff: Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Isn't weired with Axapta?


Absolutely, I agree completely with Subbu and George. These are the 
foundations of any ERP system. I too am making a career out of Axapta and I do indeed 
want Axapta to be a robust system. Microsoft should take note of this and fix them 
immediately. 
 
On sidelines of this, I would also like to mention that it's very easy to 
in-advertently edit a field in Axaptaand nowsince you have changed something 
accidentlyobviously you now would want to undo this unwanted edit. But there is no 
such "undo" that you can do in Axapta which will undo what you have accidently done. 
And this is just all over the package. Is there any solution to this? You can also 
delete various records all over Axapta. Who would ever want to delete a legal document 
in the system it may be needed anytime in the future for reference. There is no 
Alt-Print Scrn to snag a screen shot which is a defacto standard in modern day 
applications. If you customize the application then the user set up permissions tree 
cascading breaks although you may not have touched the user set up even remotely and 
microsoft doesn't have any solution to it. 
 
These are not criticism's but inputs to upgrade the product robustness.
. 
 
 
 

george_spl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I am not sure whether the problem was discovered by a CUSTOMER..
but if so, the issue should be logged with Microsoft - and you can 
tell them your fix.  If it is an old issue with a quick fix - let's 
have the have the issue logged and get that fix in the package, 
rather than relying on "smart people" to apply it every 
implementation.  That is the whole idea of packaged software.  This 
package has a large installed base that is growing quickly - nobody 
needs these kinds of transactions.  

In the case of Consistency Check, it may provide the fix as stated 
below, but Consistency Check is really more of an audit program 
looking for anomalies that were created (and maybe used in real 
time)..  How often do you want to be running it?

George 

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Van Den 
Langenbergh Gunther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi subbu,
> 
> I want to add some thing to the solution already offered. I'm 
pretty
> sure Axapta will detect this one by doing a consistency check on 
the
> vendor (it's somewhere in Basic - periodic)
> So if you will hunt down this kinds of 'faults' you could run this
> checks. They are originated not only by human mistakes but also 
because
> of crashes and other things.  Probably Axapta will not automaticaly
> correct this error because it will not now the intention (add it 
again
> to payment terms or delete it for all the vendors?).
> 
> Greetz,
> 
> Gunther
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Subbu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: donderdag 4 november 2004 3:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Isn't weired with Axapta?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ax3.0 with SP3:
> 
> Hi,
> I have created a new vendor and attached payment terms to 'A'.
> I went to the table and deleted record 'A'. Now, I came to the 
vendor
> which I just created and found still its using payment terms 'A' 
even
> though its deleted at the table level.
> 
> I have two questions.
> 
> 1. Do you think if it is allowed to delete a record when its in 
 

RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same operation name

[Arkadiusz Zimniak]

Title: Message





Hallo,
 
Maybe 
You could use overlapping quantity and modify the process time, f.e. if normally 
workctr1 does 40 pcs per hour
but 
workctr1 and workctr2 ran parallel does 30 pcs per hour, you can modify for both 
operation process time and qty
to 30 
pcs per hour and set overlap qty for first operation per 1. This way system will 
treat the both operations as
sequential but difference between start time will be so 
little that capacity will be reserved almost at the same 
time.
 
10   
primary   operation 
1    workctr1    20   overlap 
qty=120   
primary   operation 
2    workctr2    0
 
Best regards
Arkadiusz ZimniakIntegris 
Poznańtel./fax +4861 8681533, +4861 8681549e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.integris.pl  

  -Original Message-From: Dick Howard 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 4:47 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same 
  operation name
  You 
  are correct about my setup erroring too. My memory did not me serve well. The 
  Step number needs to be the same but the Operation Name must be different. 
  Would be like this...
   
  10 
  Primary     Drill 
  Machine    NC Machine #1   Next 
20
  10 Secondary1   Drill 
  Operator    Operator #45  Next 
  20
  10 Secondary2   Drill 
  Jig 
  Jim #202   Next 
  20
  20 
  Primary 
  Debur   Grinder 
  #3 Next 30
  30...
   
  You 
  are getting an error because the primary and secondary need to be on the same 
  STEP and Operation. Step 20 cannot have a secondary unless it first has a 
  primary. Also, to repeat, Axapta cannot split schedule an operation between 
  two resources and will load the entire operation on the first available 
  resource according to the routing. Work center task groups are used to seek 
  alternative work centers when the primary resource has no available capacity 
  but there is no Axapta mechanism that satisfies your implied 
  case.
   
  You 
  seem to be wanting Axapta to schedule the manual work center for part of the 
  production capacity requirement when it is standing idle while the automatic 
  machine if fully scheduled for the production. Axapta has no standard function 
  that will "split" the capacity load in this way. Perhaps it could be done by 
  customizations.
  

-Original Message-From: Gokhan Can 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 
2004 10:01 AMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: YNT: 
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same 
operation nameThank you for your notice but I am 
not trying to run parallel shared operation just for costing.I also 
wanna watch the capacity planning and already existing empty 
capacity.If I just write the primary operation to the route and 
write secondary work center work to the journal my costing will be 
calculated true but my capacity planing will work 
wrongly.10   
primary 
operation   workctr1    020   
secondary   
operation workctr2    0I 
wrote wrongly my setup was like this trying to add run 2 operations at the 
same time with 2 different machines.your setup shows an error too 
.GOKHAN CANKimden: 
Dick Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gönderilmiş: Per 04.11.2004 
16:28Kime: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Konu: RE: 
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same 
operation nameThe setup you show is erroring because the 
primary/secondary need toreference the same step and operation, not 
10/20 and 1/2 like you haveattempted to define.This Axapta 
function is commonly used to schedule secondary resourcesfor the same 
capacity reservation as the primary and would be used to dosomething 
like synchronize scheduling for an operator and a tool withthe machine 
that they serve. The route would look like this.10 Primary Drilling 
NC Machine #110 Secondary 1 Drilling NC Operator #310 Secondary 2 
Drilling NC Jig #14Notice that the Step "10" and Operation 
"Drilling" is common for allthree route lines. There is a Primary and 
two Secondaries. This "binds"the resources for scheduling 
purposes.When scheduling is run the operator and the jig will be 
scheduled forthe same working time as the NC Machine.What you 
are trying to do is commonly referred to as "alternative"routing, where 
an alternate resource is used to share the work. Axaptawill not do this 
scheduling-wise because it will do the entire capacityreservation on the 
same resource from start to finish. However, whenadding lines to the 
Route Card journal one can choose to "charge" thehours against an 
"alternate" work center. For example, the journal linewill default to 
the resource listed on the Production Route when a newl

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Credit Card Payments in Enterprise Portal

[Vanessa Kirberger]

Does anyone know what the procedure would be to have Credit Card 
Payments in Enterprise Portal.
regards Vanessa





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Isn't weired with Axapta?

[Rajendra Sherikar]

Absolutely, I agree completely with Subbu and George. These are the foundations of any ERP system. I too am making a career out of Axapta and I do indeed want Axapta to be a robust system. Microsoft should take note of this and fix them immediately. 
 
On sidelines of this, I would also like to mention that it's very easy to in-advertently edit a field in Axaptaand nowsince you have changed something accidentlyobviously you now would want to undo this unwanted edit. But there is no such "undo" that you can do in Axapta which will undo what you have accidently done. And this is just all over the package. Is there any solution to this? You can also delete various records all over Axapta. Who would ever want to delete a legal document in the system it may be needed anytime in the future for reference. There is no Alt-Print Scrn to snag a screen shot which is a defacto standard in modern day applications. If you customize the application then the user set up permissions tree cascading breaks although you may not have touched the user set up even remotely and microsoft doesn't have any solution to it. 
 
These are not criticism's but inputs to upgrade the product robustness.
. 
 
 
 
george_spl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not sure whether the problem was discovered by a CUSTOMER..but if so, the issue should be logged with Microsoft - and you can tell them your fix.  If it is an old issue with a quick fix - let's have the have the issue logged and get that fix in the package, rather than relying on "smart people" to apply it every implementation.  That is the whole idea of packaged software.  This package has a large installed base that is growing quickly - nobody needs these kinds of transactions.  In the case of Consistency Check, it may provide the fix as stated below, but Consistency Check is really more of an audit program looking for anomalies that were created (and maybe used in real time)..  How often do you want to be running it?George --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Van Den
 Langenbergh Gunther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi subbu,> > I want to add some thing to the solution already offered. I'm pretty> sure Axapta will detect this one by doing a consistency check on the> vendor (it's somewhere in Basic - periodic)> So if you will hunt down this kinds of 'faults' you could run this> checks. They are originated not only by human mistakes but also because> of crashes and other things.  Probably Axapta will not automaticaly> correct this error because it will not now the intention (add it again> to payment terms or delete it for all the vendors?).> > Greetz,> > Gunther> > -Original Message-> From: Subbu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 4 november 2004 3:46> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Isn't weired with
 Axapta?> > > > > Ax3.0 with SP3:> > Hi,> I have created a new vendor and attached payment terms to 'A'.> I went to the table and deleted record 'A'. Now, I came to the vendor> which I just created and found still its using payment terms 'A' even> though its deleted at the table level.> > I have two questions.> > 1. Do you think if it is allowed to delete a record when its in use?>    is it not violating the RDMS concept against the data integrity?>    > > 2. Its still showing up the 'A'. I cleared the user cache, but still its> showing 'A' for the vendor. > > I am just wondering if you accept this issue with me.> > > Any ideas are greatly appreciated!.> Is Axapta going to screw my Implemetation ( Largest in USA )? I don't> want to support this type
 of systems!.> > Thanks,> Subbu> > > > > >  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.> http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM> ~-> > > Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. > Yahoo! Groups LinksSharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
	
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.  www.yahoo.com

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.








Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Isn't weired with Axapta?

[george_spl]

I am not sure whether the problem was discovered by a CUSTOMER..
but if so, the issue should be logged with Microsoft - and you can 
tell them your fix.  If it is an old issue with a quick fix - let's 
have the have the issue logged and get that fix in the package, 
rather than relying on "smart people" to apply it every 
implementation.  That is the whole idea of packaged software.  This 
package has a large installed base that is growing quickly - nobody 
needs these kinds of transactions.  

In the case of Consistency Check, it may provide the fix as stated 
below, but Consistency Check is really more of an audit program 
looking for anomalies that were created (and maybe used in real 
time)..  How often do you want to be running it?

George 

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Van Den 
Langenbergh Gunther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi subbu,
> 
> I want to add some thing to the solution already offered. I'm 
pretty
> sure Axapta will detect this one by doing a consistency check on 
the
> vendor (it's somewhere in Basic - periodic)
> So if you will hunt down this kinds of 'faults' you could run this
> checks. They are originated not only by human mistakes but also 
because
> of crashes and other things.  Probably Axapta will not automaticaly
> correct this error because it will not now the intention (add it 
again
> to payment terms or delete it for all the vendors?).
> 
> Greetz,
> 
> Gunther
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Subbu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: donderdag 4 november 2004 3:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Isn't weired with Axapta?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ax3.0 with SP3:
> 
> Hi,
> I have created a new vendor and attached payment terms to 'A'.
> I went to the table and deleted record 'A'. Now, I came to the 
vendor
> which I just created and found still its using payment terms 'A' 
even
> though its deleted at the table level.
> 
> I have two questions.
> 
> 1. Do you think if it is allowed to delete a record when its in 
use?
>is it not violating the RDMS concept against the data integrity?
>
> 
> 2. Its still showing up the 'A'. I cleared the user cache, but 
still its
> showing 'A' for the vendor. 
> 
> I am just wondering if you accept this issue with me.
> 
> 
> Any ideas are greatly appreciated!.
> Is Axapta going to screw my Implemetation ( Largest in USA )? I 
don't
> want to support this type of systems!.
> 
> Thanks,
> Subbu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
~-->
> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
> ---
-~-> 
> 
> Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
> Yahoo! Groups Links





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Customized Reports in Axapta

[roberto pineda]

I made a report with many columns, i.e. 14 columns,
[12 months, one of description and 
one for accumulated balance]. The problem is that I
need that report show all 
in al single line, but if I use "Auto [Left]"
property, the report will give me 
two lines. I need all data in one line  because I need
to make a sum of 
every column.  

My temporally solution was reduce the font Size to 7,
but some users have 
problems read it, and larger numbers will only show
asterisks [].  
   
I used the default "Width" property of the every
control [except the shapes], 
to avoid losing information, but I didn’t use the
default "Top" and "Left" 
property values.  
   
One more thing, we have many clients in different
countries. Every country  
use their own printer model. I’m not sure if this
situation can produce  
problems, because when I create a report in XXX
country, and they look at it 
in YYY country, they said: "This report does not have
alignments in the titles 
with the data".

Thanks a lot, for any help.

=
Roberto Pineda



__
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡100 MB GRATIS!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same operation name

[Dick Howard]

You are correct about my setup erroring too. My memory did not me serve
well. The Step number needs to be the same but the Operation Name must be
different. Would be like this...
 
10 Primary Drill MachineNC Machine #1   Next 20
10 Secondary1   Drill OperatorOperator #45  Next 20
10 Secondary2   Drill Jig Jim #202   Next 20
20 Primary Debur   Grinder #3 Next 30
30...
 
You are getting an error because the primary and secondary need to be on the
same STEP and Operation. Step 20 cannot have a secondary unless it first has
a primary. Also, to repeat, Axapta cannot split schedule an operation
between two resources and will load the entire operation on the first
available resource according to the routing. Work center task groups are
used to seek alternative work centers when the primary resource has no
available capacity but there is no Axapta mechanism that satisfies your
implied case.
 
You seem to be wanting Axapta to schedule the manual work center for part of
the production capacity requirement when it is standing idle while the
automatic machine if fully scheduled for the production. Axapta has no
standard function that will "split" the capacity load in this way. Perhaps
it could be done by customizations.

-Original Message-
From: Gokhan Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YNT: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name


Thank you for your notice but I am not trying to run parallel shared
operation just for costing.
I also wanna watch the capacity planning and already existing empty
capacity.

If I just write the primary operation to the route and write secondary work
center work to the journal my costing will be calculated true but my
capacity planing will work wrongly.

10   primary operation   workctr10
20   secondary   operation workctr20

I wrote wrongly my setup was like this trying to add run 2 operations at the
same time with 2 different machines.

your setup shows an error too .

GOKHAN CAN



Kimden: Dick Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gönderilmiş: Per 04.11.2004 16:28
Kime: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Konu: RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name


The setup you show is erroring because the primary/secondary need to
reference the same step and operation, not 10/20 and 1/2 like you have
attempted to define.

This Axapta function is commonly used to schedule secondary resources
for the same capacity reservation as the primary and would be used to do
something like synchronize scheduling for an operator and a tool with
the machine that they serve. The route would look like this.

10 Primary Drilling NC Machine #1
10 Secondary 1 Drilling NC Operator #3
10 Secondary 2 Drilling NC Jig #14

Notice that the Step "10" and Operation "Drilling" is common for all
three route lines. There is a Primary and two Secondaries. This "binds"
the resources for scheduling purposes.

When scheduling is run the operator and the jig will be scheduled for
the same working time as the NC Machine.

What you are trying to do is commonly referred to as "alternative"
routing, where an alternate resource is used to share the work. Axapta
will not do this scheduling-wise because it will do the entire capacity
reservation on the same resource from start to finish. However, when
adding lines to the Route Card journal one can choose to "charge" the
hours against an "alternate" work center. For example, the journal line
will default to the resource listed on the Production Route when a new
line is added to the journal, but the user can override this. In you
case the NC machine would have reservations for the order, but on the
journal line General tab, this could be changed to Work Center "Drill
Press 1" before posting the journal.

Hope this helps to clarify your case.

-Original Message-
From: Gokhan Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name



Hi all;

I have a problem about work centers and operations.

I usually do an operation with one work center but If another work
center is empty I can divide my 
operation into two parallel operations in one route .

But in axapta it does not let me to do this

as an example I can make holes on a plate by automated machine but if I
have my manually machine  empty I can make some of holes by using
manually machine.

10   primary   operation 1workctr10
20   secondary   operation 2workctr20

I get an error right here

Has anybody noticed this kind of problem?





Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links









Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
ADVERTISEMENT
click here

RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same operation name

[Gulden SAYLAN]

  Hi Gokhan,

 
I think your problem is not clear. Please clarify your case.
 
And.
10   primary operation   workctr10
20   secondary   operation workctr20

Your setup is wrong. Axapta give a error..
Does it your really setup ?
Are you sure that your operation numbers are different from each other ?
 
Gulden..

-Original Message-
From: Gokhan Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YNT: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name


Thank you for your notice but I am not trying to run parallel shared
operation just for costing.
I also wanna watch the capacity planning and already existing empty
capacity.
 
If I just write the primary operation to the route and write secondary work
center work to the journal my costing will be calculated true but my
capacity planing will work wrongly.
 
10   primary operation   workctr10
20   secondary   operation workctr20

I wrote wrongly my setup was like this trying to add run 2 operations at the
same time with 2 different machines.
 
your setup shows an error too .
 
GOKHAN CAN

  _  

Kimden: Dick Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gönderilmiş: Per 04.11.2004 16:28
Kime: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Konu: RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name


The setup you show is erroring because the primary/secondary need to
reference the same step and operation, not 10/20 and 1/2 like you have
attempted to define.

This Axapta function is commonly used to schedule secondary resources
for the same capacity reservation as the primary and would be used to do
something like synchronize scheduling for an operator and a tool with
the machine that they serve. The route would look like this.

10 Primary Drilling NC Machine #1
10 Secondary 1 Drilling NC Operator #3
10 Secondary 2 Drilling NC Jig #14

Notice that the Step "10" and Operation "Drilling" is common for all
three route lines. There is a Primary and two Secondaries. This "binds"
the resources for scheduling purposes.

When scheduling is run the operator and the jig will be scheduled for
the same working time as the NC Machine.

What you are trying to do is commonly referred to as "alternative"
routing, where an alternate resource is used to share the work. Axapta
will not do this scheduling-wise because it will do the entire capacity
reservation on the same resource from start to finish. However, when
adding lines to the Route Card journal one can choose to "charge" the
hours against an "alternate" work center. For example, the journal line
will default to the resource listed on the Production Route when a new
line is added to the journal, but the user can override this. In you
case the NC machine would have reservations for the order, but on the
journal line General tab, this could be changed to Work Center "Drill
Press 1" before posting the journal.

Hope this helps to clarify your case.

-Original Message-
From: Gokhan Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name



Hi all;

I have a problem about work centers and operations.

I usually do an operation with one work center but If another work
center is empty I can divide my 
operation into two parallel operations in one route .

But in axapta it does not let me to do this

as an example I can make holes on a plate by automated machine but if I
have my manually machine  empty I can make some of holes by using
manually machine.

10   primary   operation 1workctr10
20   secondary   operation 2workctr20

I get an error right here

Has anybody noticed this kind of problem?





Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links









Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor   

ADVERTISEMENT
 
 click
here



  _  

Yahoo! Groups Links


*   To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/
  

*   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  

*   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
 . 




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/gr

YNT: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same operation name

[Gokhan Can]

Thank you for your notice but I am not trying to run parallel shared operation just 
for costing.
I also wanna watch the capacity planning and already existing empty capacity.
 
If I just write the primary operation to the route and write secondary work center 
work to the journal my costing will be calculated true but my capacity planing will 
work wrongly.
 
10   primary operation   workctr10
20   secondary   operation workctr20

I wrote wrongly my setup was like this trying to add run 2 operations at the same time 
with 2 different machines.
 
your setup shows an error too .
 
GOKHAN CAN



Kimden: Dick Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gönderilmiş: Per 04.11.2004 16:28
Kime: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Konu: RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same 
operation name


The setup you show is erroring because the primary/secondary need to
reference the same step and operation, not 10/20 and 1/2 like you have
attempted to define.

This Axapta function is commonly used to schedule secondary resources
for the same capacity reservation as the primary and would be used to do
something like synchronize scheduling for an operator and a tool with
the machine that they serve. The route would look like this.

10 Primary Drilling NC Machine #1
10 Secondary 1 Drilling NC Operator #3
10 Secondary 2 Drilling NC Jig #14

Notice that the Step "10" and Operation "Drilling" is common for all
three route lines. There is a Primary and two Secondaries. This "binds"
the resources for scheduling purposes.

When scheduling is run the operator and the jig will be scheduled for
the same working time as the NC Machine.

What you are trying to do is commonly referred to as "alternative"
routing, where an alternate resource is used to share the work. Axapta
will not do this scheduling-wise because it will do the entire capacity
reservation on the same resource from start to finish. However, when
adding lines to the Route Card journal one can choose to "charge" the
hours against an "alternate" work center. For example, the journal line
will default to the resource listed on the Production Route when a new
line is added to the journal, but the user can override this. In you
case the NC machine would have reservations for the order, but on the
journal line General tab, this could be changed to Work Center "Drill
Press 1" before posting the journal.

Hope this helps to clarify your case.

-Original Message-
From: Gokhan Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name



Hi all;

I have a problem about work centers and operations.

I usually do an operation with one work center but If another work
center is empty I can divide my 
operation into two parallel operations in one route .

But in axapta it does not let me to do this

as an example I can make holes on a plate by automated machine but if I
have my manually machine  empty I can make some of holes by using
manually machine.

10   primary   operation 1workctr10
20   secondary   operation 2workctr20

I get an error right here

Has anybody noticed this kind of problem?





Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links









Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor   
ADVERTISEMENT
click here 

   




Yahoo! Groups Links


*   To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/
  
*   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  
*   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service 
 . 




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
<>

RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same operation name

[Dick Howard]

The setup you show is erroring because the primary/secondary need to
reference the same step and operation, not 10/20 and 1/2 like you have
attempted to define.

This Axapta function is commonly used to schedule secondary resources
for the same capacity reservation as the primary and would be used to do
something like synchronize scheduling for an operator and a tool with
the machine that they serve. The route would look like this.

10 Primary Drilling NC Machine #1
10 Secondary 1 Drilling NC Operator #3
10 Secondary 2 Drilling NC Jig #14

Notice that the Step "10" and Operation "Drilling" is common for all
three route lines. There is a Primary and two Secondaries. This "binds"
the resources for scheduling purposes.

When scheduling is run the operator and the jig will be scheduled for
the same working time as the NC Machine.

What you are trying to do is commonly referred to as "alternative"
routing, where an alternate resource is used to share the work. Axapta
will not do this scheduling-wise because it will do the entire capacity
reservation on the same resource from start to finish. However, when
adding lines to the Route Card journal one can choose to "charge" the
hours against an "alternate" work center. For example, the journal line
will default to the resource listed on the Production Route when a new
line is added to the journal, but the user can override this. In you
case the NC machine would have reservations for the order, but on the
journal line General tab, this could be changed to Work Center "Drill
Press 1" before posting the journal.

Hope this helps to clarify your case.

-Original Message-
From: Gokhan Can [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using
same operation name



Hi all;
 
I have a problem about work centers and operations.
 
I usually do an operation with one work center but If another work
center is empty I can divide my 
operation into two parallel operations in one route .
 
But in axapta it does not let me to do this
 
as an example I can make holes on a plate by automated machine but if I
have my manually machine  empty I can make some of holes by using
manually machine.
 
10   primary   operation 1workctr10
20   secondary   operation 2workctr20
 
I get an error right here
 
Has anybody noticed this kind of problem?
 
 



Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Multiple workcenters parallel using same operation name

[Gokhan Can]

Hi all;
 
I have a problem about work centers and operations.
 
I usually do an operation with one work center but If another work center is empty I 
can divide my 
operation into two parallel operations in one route .
 
But in axapta it does not let me to do this
 
as an example I can make holes on a plate by automated machine but if I have my 
manually machine  empty I can make some of holes by using manually machine.
 
10   primary   operation 1workctr10
20   secondary   operation 2workctr20
 
I get an error right here
 
Has anybody noticed this kind of problem?
 
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Mutliple Workcenters with same operation

[Gokhan Can]

Hi all;
 
I have a problem about work centers and operations.
 
I usually do an operation with one work center but If another work center is empty I 
can divide my 
operation into two parallel operations in one route .
 
But in axapta it does not let me to do this
 
as an example I can make holes on a plate by automated machine but if I have my 
manually machine  empty I can make some of holes by using manually machine.
 
10   primary   operation 1workctr10
20   secondary   operation 2workctr20
 
I get an error right here
 
Has anybody noticed this kind of problem?
 
 
 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
<>

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Retriving Value from string Edit Control(textbox)

[Nitesh]

Hi Vivek,
    
Change the Autodeclaration property of that control(StringEdit) to yes. Now u 
can retrived the entered value by using" text method "of that control.(ie 
StringEdit.text )Hope it will work..
 
Regards
Nitesh


Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.








Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Retriving Value from string Edit Control(textbox)

[viveck2002]

Hi

I have created a form with out a Data Source i.e. without linking 
form to a datbase table. I put a String edit control on it.I am  able 
to use properties like background color and change values at run time 
but when i go for the enetered text in that control , i want to take 
input and want to store in some variable. I am unable to do it.

How we can excess the value which is entered in text box and can 
store it in some variable. So that that variable can be used for 
other purpose.

how it can be done ??

Pls help me to find solution .
Waiting for ur responses.

Regards






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

AW: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Error Message: Number Sequence for Network is not initialized when creating Employee

[tau]

Title: Error Message: Number Sequence for Network is not initialized when creating Employee





Hi 
Ferry,
Look 
at "Human Resources / Setup / Parameters / Number sequence", Reference is 
"Person".
 
Or use 
the Wizard for Number sequences to determine, which number sequences are 
missing.
 
Regards,
Tom

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Yours 
sincerely  / Med venlig hilsen 
Thomas Aulbert Berater / Consultant 
Columbus IT Partner Deutschland GmbH 
Oeynhausener Straße 48-54 32584 Löhne, Deutschland 
tel +49 5732 
902-0 fax +49 5732 902-599 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.columbus-it.com 
Our journey is together! 

  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Ferry Widjaja 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. 
  November 2004 09:57An: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: 
  [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Error Message: Number Sequence for Network is not 
  initialized when creating Employee
  Hi all, 
  Does anyone know why an error message: "Number 
  Sequence for Network is not Initialized" appears when I try to create Employee 
  ID on Basic --> Employee menu? Thanks in advance
  Best 
  Regards, 
  Ferry 
  Widjaja Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
  


Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.








Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Error Message: Number Sequence for Network is not initialized when creating Employee

[Ferry Widjaja]

Title: Error Message: Number Sequence for Network is not initialized when creating Employee








Hi all,


Does anyone know why an error message: "Number Sequence for Network is not Initialized" appears when I try to create Employee ID on Basic --> Employee menu? Thanks in advance

Best Regards,


Ferry Widjaja





Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.








Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] retrieving labeltext from a reportfield

[Andries Patrick]

Title: Message





Hello,
 
I'm trying to 
retrieve the labeltext printed on a report.  
 
I can retrieve this 
text with field.label() if there is acctually put a label on the field in the 
report, but not if the label is taken from the datafield or from the 
EDT. 
 
Does anybody knows 
if we can use the method that axapta uses to print this 
label.
 
Thanks 
Patrick 


Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.








Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Isn't weired with Axapta?

[Van Den Langenbergh Gunther]

Hi subbu,

I want to add some thing to the solution already offered. I'm pretty
sure Axapta will detect this one by doing a consistency check on the
vendor (it's somewhere in Basic - periodic)
So if you will hunt down this kinds of 'faults' you could run this
checks. They are originated not only by human mistakes but also because
of crashes and other things.  Probably Axapta will not automaticaly
correct this error because it will not now the intention (add it again
to payment terms or delete it for all the vendors?).

Greetz,

Gunther

-Original Message-
From: Subbu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: donderdag 4 november 2004 3:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Isn't weired with Axapta?




Ax3.0 with SP3:

Hi,
I have created a new vendor and attached payment terms to 'A'.
I went to the table and deleted record 'A'. Now, I came to the vendor
which I just created and found still its using payment terms 'A' even
though its deleted at the table level.

I have two questions.

1. Do you think if it is allowed to delete a record when its in use?
   is it not violating the RDMS concept against the data integrity?
   

2. Its still showing up the 'A'. I cleared the user cache, but still its
showing 'A' for the vendor. 

I am just wondering if you accept this issue with me.


Any ideas are greatly appreciated!.
Is Axapta going to screw my Implemetation ( Largest in USA )? I don't
want to support this type of systems!.

Thanks,
Subbu





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/