Gnome desktop: unreadable characters

2010-06-01 Thread Tobias Vogel

hi,

I followed the blfs-book carefully and so far, everything worked.
I set up Gnome and GDM but after the first reboot, all characters were
gone (see attached picture). Any ideas?

thanks,

Toby
attachment: Bildschirmfoto.jpg-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Gnome desktop: unreadable characters

2010-06-01 Thread Ken Moffat
On 1 June 2010 07:16, Tobias Vogel tobias.vo...@linux.com wrote:
 hi,

 I followed the blfs-book carefully and so far, everything worked.
 I set up Gnome and GDM but after the first reboot, all characters were
 gone (see attached picture). Any ideas?

 thanks,

 Toby

 --
 Missing fonts.  Or, fonts somewhere that xorg can't find them.

 With both X (7.5) and (some of) gnome in /usr. my ttfs are in
directories under /usr/share/fonts/.  ISTR they used to go into
/usr/lib/X11/fonts, in fact my xorg.conf still has archaic
references to non-existent directories for old-style fonts
there, which means my X log reports that the FontPath ends
up empty - doesn't matter for me, fontconfig handles it.

 Anything interesting in your X or daemon logs ?

 Are you saying that it worked once, then failed after you
rebooted?  If so, what was different about the first time ?

ĸen
-- 
After tragedy, and farce, OMG poneys!
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: gnome desktop

2010-05-20 Thread Simon Geard
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 19:54 -0700, Carl Thorn wrote:
 I have been trying to build a gnome desktop on top of an LFS version
 6.6 I am up to installing the gnome-doc-utils and keep getting the
 following build error. I have checked and rechecked to make sure I
 have all the dependencies correct. If you could help me find the error
 I would appreciate it. below is the error code I get.
 /bin/sh: line 1: 18784 Segmentation fault  xsltproc -o
 gnome-doc-make-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename gnome-doc-make
 --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd
 -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN --stringparam db2omf.lang C
 --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir /usr/share/omf --stringparam
 db2omf.help_dir /usr/share/gnome/help --stringparam db2omf.omf_in
 /blfs/gnome-doc-utils-0.18.1/doc/gnome-doc-make/gnome-doc-make.omf.in 
 --stringparam db2omf.scrollkeeper_cl `scrollkeeper-config 
 --pkgdatadir`/Templates/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml 
 ../../xslt/docbook/omf/db2omf.xsl C/gnome-doc-make.xml

The error looks familiar, though I unfortunately don't recall how I
solved it - certainly, I'm not currently doing anything odd with the
install of either libxslt or gnome-doc-utils. Perhaps if you try the
latest versions of both packages, the problem may go away?

Simon.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

xsltproc segfault (was: gnome desktop)

2010-05-20 Thread Lars Bamberger
On 20.05.2010 11:24, Simon Geard wrote:
 [ Segmentation fault  xsltproc ]

Upgrade to libxml2-2.7.7. blfs-svn is still on libxml2-2.7.6. It seems,
that the segfault was happening in xmlParserInputBufferCreateFilename,
which is a libxml2 function.

Works fine here.

HTH
Lars
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: xsltproc segfault (was: gnome desktop)

2010-05-20 Thread linux fan
On 5/20/10, Lars Bamberger maill...@herr-der-mails.de wrote:
 On 20.05.2010 11:24, Simon Geard wrote:
 [ Segmentation fault  xsltproc ]

 Upgrade to libxml2-2.7.7. blfs-svn is still on libxml2-2.7.6. It seems,
 that the segfault was happening in xmlParserInputBufferCreateFilename,
 which is a libxml2 function.

 Works fine here.


libxml2-2.7.6 works fine here.

I wonder though (libxml2),
# DEPENDENCIES:
#
# NOTES:
# Optional ... 
# ... Python-x (libxml2 will install a Python library module if Python found)
#
# The confusing note means that libxml2 will install the Python library module
# if libxml2 installation detects that Python is installed.
# Python does not install the libxml2 module!
#
# Therefore Python should be installed first if want that module.
#
# Some software e.g., gnome may want that module.

could not getting that module installed lead to segfault?
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


gnome desktop

2010-05-19 Thread Carl Thorn
I have been trying to build a gnome desktop on top of an LFS version 6.6 I am 
up to installing the gnome-doc-utils and keep getting the following build 
error. I have checked and rechecked to make sure I have all the dependencies 
correct. If you could help me find the error I would appreciate it. below is 
the error code I get.
/bin/sh: line 1: 18784 Segmentation fault  xsltproc -o gnome-doc-make-C.omf 
--stringparam db2omf.basename gnome-doc-make --stringparam db2omf.format 
'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN 
--stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir /usr/share/omf 
--stringparam db2omf.help_dir /usr/share/gnome/help --stringparam 
db2omf.omf_in 
/blfs/gnome-doc-utils-0.18.1/doc/gnome-doc-make/gnome-doc-make.omf.in 
--stringparam db2omf.scrollkeeper_cl `scrollkeeper-config 
--pkgdatadir`/Templates/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml 
../../xslt/docbook/omf/db2omf.xsl C/gnome-doc-make.xml
make[2]: *** [gnome-doc-make-C.omf] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/blfs/gnome-doc-utils-0.18.1/doc/gnome-doc-make'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/blfs/gnome-doc-utils-0.18.1/doc'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Gnome-desktop 2.28 build failure

2009-12-09 Thread cliffhanger
Hi

Building Gnome-desktop 2.28 from Blfs gives the following error - has 
any one seen this?

make[3]: Entering directory 
`/home/sources/gnome-desktop-2.28.0/desktop-docs/fdl'
if ! test -d ar/; then mkdir ar/; fi
if [ -f C/fdl.xml ]; then d=../; else 
d=/home/sources/gnome-desktop-2.28.0/desktop-docs/fdl/; fi; \
(cd ar/  \
  `which xml2po` -e -p \
${d}ar/ar.po \
${d}C/fdl.xml  fdl.xml.tmp  \
cp fdl.xml.tmp fdl.xml  rm -f fdl.xml.tmp)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /opt/gnome/bin/xml2po, line 185, in module
main(sys.argv[1:])
  File /opt/gnome/bin/xml2po, line 88, in main
from xml2po import Main
ImportError: No module named xml2po
make[3]: *** [ar/fdl.xml] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/home/sources/gnome-desktop-2.28.0/desktop-docs/fdl'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/home/sources/gnome-desktop-2.28.0/desktop-docs'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/sources/gnome-desktop-2.28.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2

I'm running Python 2.6.2 and libxml2 2.7.6

I'm installing into /opt/gnome, xml2pro is present here under 
/lib/python.

I have made all the configuration changes to /etc/profile

I can find nothing on google about this particular module in relation 
to gnome-desktop  - can you help?

MAC

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Gnome-desktop 2.28 build failure

2009-12-09 Thread linux fan
On 12/9/09, cliffhanger wrote:
 Hi

 Building Gnome-desktop 2.28 from Blfs gives the following error - has
 any one seen this?
 ImportError: No module named xml2po

I don't know about xml2po, but you build libxml2 after python get some
libxml2 python modules.
1. python
2. libxml2
3.libxslt

I only wonder if some gnome thing gnome-doc-utils? might need the
libxml2 python modules to build the xml2po?
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Gnome-desktop 2.28 build failure

2009-12-09 Thread William Immendorf
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:32 PM,  cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
 if ! test -d ar/; then mkdir ar/; fi
 if [ -f C/fdl.xml ]; then d=../; else
 d=/home/sources/gnome-desktop-2.28.0/desktop-docs/fdl/; fi; \
        (cd ar/  \
          `which xml2po` -e -p \
            ${d}ar/ar.po \
            ${d}C/fdl.xml  fdl.xml.tmp  \
            cp fdl.xml.tmp fdl.xml  rm -f fdl.xml.tmp)
 Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /opt/gnome/bin/xml2po, line 185, in module
    main(sys.argv[1:])
  File /opt/gnome/bin/xml2po, line 88, in main
    from xml2po import Main
 ImportError: No module named xml2po
This happened to me too, but with GParted. The fix I used was:

ln -sfv $GNOME_PREFIX/lib/python2.6/site-packages/xml2po \
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages

(run as root or anyone else who has access to /usr/lib)

Hope this helps.


-- 
William Immendorf
The ultimate in free computing.
Messages in plain text, please, no HTML.

--

Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master.  Richard Stallman
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Gnome-desktop 2.28 build failure

2009-12-09 Thread Simon Geard
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 17:32 -0500, cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
 Hi
 
 Building Gnome-desktop 2.28 from Blfs gives the following error - has 
 any one seen this?

Is gnome-doc-utils installed? That seems to be what provides the xml2po
package...

Simon.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: gnome-desktop-2.24 compile problem

2008-11-19 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Dennis J Perkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm having trouble compiling gnome-desktop.  It gives me this error
 message:

 gnome-rr.c:46: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
 'XRRScreenResources'

 Has anyone else encountered this and solved it?

That's from libXrandr. Either your randrproto/libXrandr combo is too
old (pre-1.2) or too new, depending on what gnome-desktop wants with
it. I suspect too old, though, since I understand that newer gnome was
trying to make use of the RandR-1.2 API. What version of
randrproto/libXrandr did you install?

--
Dan
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: gnome-desktop-2.24 compile problem

2008-11-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:03:18PM -0700, Dennis J Perkins wrote:
 I'm having trouble compiling gnome-desktop.  It gives me this error
 message:
 
 gnome-rr.c:46: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
 'XRRScreenResources'
 
 Has anyone else encountered this and solved it?
 
 Encountered it, yes (trying to build gnome-2.24 on top of a
redundant BLFS-6.3 system).  Solved it, no (gnome seemed to build
fine on a more recent system using gcc-4.2, and I
didn't need gnome-desktop on that system).

 I'm guessing its a header from libXrandr or Xrandr.  The 1.2 series
for xorg-7.3 and 7.4 seem to be ok.

 Fedora has a (big) patch from early gnome-2.22, not sure if it will
help -
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2008-March/msg04991.html

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: gnome-desktop-2.24 compile problem

2008-11-19 Thread Dennis J Perkins
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 06:02 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Dennis J Perkins
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm having trouble compiling gnome-desktop.  It gives me this error
  message:
 
  gnome-rr.c:46: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
  'XRRScreenResources'
 
  Has anyone else encountered this and solved it?
 
 That's from libXrandr. Either your randrproto/libXrandr combo is too
 old (pre-1.2) or too new, depending on what gnome-desktop wants with
 it. I suspect too old, though, since I understand that newer gnome was
 trying to make use of the RandR-1.2 API. What version of
 randrproto/libXrandr did you install?

It's pre 1.2.  I guess I can build a new Xorg.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


gnome-desktop-2.24 compile problem

2008-11-18 Thread Dennis J Perkins
I'm having trouble compiling gnome-desktop.  It gives me this error
message:

gnome-rr.c:46: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'XRRScreenResources'

Has anyone else encountered this and solved it?

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-31 Thread David Ciecierski

Hello again,
just thought I would add to the discussion: gnome-doc-utils solved all 
my problems instantaneously. And I do agree with Randy that copy  
paste *does* make things (ie. installing BLFS  GNOME) a breeze. Most 
of the time, at least. What *does not* make installing things a breeze 
is the user package hint. It was all fine with LFS and most BLFS 
packages. But with GNOME and so fearfully (irritatingly?) many packages 
interacting with one another, and desperately wanting to write to 
another's directory - it's becoming a slight pain.


Not that I'm not glad I've been following the hint - it's awesome IMHO. 
So even I happen to curse the bloody idea at times (see my new post 
above :-) I'm still in love with it. Period.


Kind regards,
David Ciecierski

PS: And thanks for all your support - as always...
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-31 Thread David Ciecierski

A word of advice, go thru the log file for *all* packages, especially
for the installation portion.


Yeah, I do it *now*... But that's indeed a *very* apropriate piece of 
advice, I wish I heard it (and followed!) it from the beginning! But at 
least my server (HLFS, almost at kernel stage) will get more attention.


Regards,
David Ciecierski
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


GNOME-desktop

2005-08-30 Thread David Ciecierski

Hello,
At the beginning I feel I should state I'm following the package user 
hint, it's probably related. So what happens? I'm trying to install 
gnome-desktop, version 2.11.92, and make fails with the following in the 
log:


[code]

make[2]: Entering directory 
`/usr/src/gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-2.11.92/desktop-docs'

Making all in fdl
C/fdl.xml:603: parser error : Entity 'copy' not defined
Copyright copy; YEAR YOUR NAME.
^
make[3]: Entering directory 
`/usr/src/gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-2.11.92/desktop-docs/fdl'
xsltproc -o fdl-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename fdl --stringparam 
db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd -//OASIS//DTD DocBook 
XML V4.1.2//EN --stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir 
/usr/share/omf --stringparam db2omf.help_dir /usr/share/gnome/help 
--stringparam db2omf.omf_in `pwd`/./fdl.omf.in `/usr/bin/pkg-config 
--variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` C/fdl.xml

compilation error: file C/fdl.xml line 15 element article
xsltParseStylesheetProcess : document is not a stylesheet
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/usr/src/gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-2.11.92/desktop-docs/fdl'

make[3]: *** [fdl-C.omf] Error 5
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/usr/src/gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-2.11.92/desktop-docs'

make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-2.11.92'
make: *** [all] Error 2

[/code]

I am guessing it has something to do with libxslt and/or docbook xml dtd 
install... but no clue what. Thanks for your help!


Kind regards,
David Ciecierski
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-30 Thread Tarek Ghaleb
* On [31 Aug 2005 00:10 +0300] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At the beginning I feel I should state I'm following the package user 
 hint, it's probably related. So what happens? I'm trying to install 
 gnome-desktop, version 2.11.92, and make fails with the following in the 
 log:
 
 [code]
 
 make[2]: Entering directory 
 `/usr/src/gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-2.11.92/desktop-docs'
 Making all in fdl
 C/fdl.xml:603: parser error : Entity 'copy' not defined
   Copyright copy; YEAR YOUR NAME.
   ^
 make[3]: Entering directory 
 `/usr/src/gnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-2.11.92/desktop-docs/fdl'
 xsltproc -o fdl-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename fdl --stringparam 
 db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd -//OASIS//DTD DocBook 
 XML V4.1.2//EN --stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir 
 /usr/share/omf --stringparam db2omf.help_dir /usr/share/gnome/help 
 --stringparam db2omf.omf_in `pwd`/./fdl.omf.in `/usr/bin/pkg-config 
 --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` C/fdl.xml
 compilation error: file C/fdl.xml line 15 element article
 xsltParseStylesheetProcess : document is not a stylesheet

It seems that the xml parser, xsltproc, can't find the iso-entities
definitions. The copy; entity is in the ISOnum.ent file. On my Debian
box that's under /usr/share/xml/entities/xml-iso-entities-8879.1986 . I
haven't installed DocBook on my LFS system yet. You should check that
the iso-entities are installed--I think they don't come with the
DTD's. It's been a while since I used DocBook, but it's always tricky to
set it up to work correctly.

Tarek.

-- 
History is a set of lies agreed upon. - Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Tarek Ghaleb wrote these words on 08/30/05 18:05 CST:

 It's been a while since I used DocBook, but it's always tricky to
 set it up to work correctly.

If you cut and paste (or type very carefully) all the commands for
the various packages that make up the SGML and XML DocBook stuff
from the BLFS book, everything will work perfectly. :-)

It's really not that tricky at all.

BTW - I don't think that is what is wrong with the OP's situation.
I would bet it isn't a DocBook issue at all.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
18:05:03 up 150 days, 17:38, 2 users, load average: 1.03, 0.68, 0.33
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/30/05 18:08 CST:

 BTW - I don't think that is what is wrong with the OP's situation.
 I would bet it isn't a DocBook issue at all.

I should have qualified this with if he installed all the dependencies
for gnome-session IAW with BLFS at the end of the last sentence.

Sorry for the confusion. Too much in a hurry to hit the send button.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
18:10:00 up 150 days, 17:43, 2 users, load average: 1.42, 1.06, 0.58
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-30 Thread Tarek Ghaleb
* On [31 Aug 2005 02:08 +0300] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you cut and paste (or type very carefully) all the commands for
 the various packages that make up the SGML and XML DocBook stuff
 from the BLFS book, everything will work perfectly. :-)

Actually, you're right. When you cut and paste everything becomes quite
easy;-)

 It's really not that tricky at all.

You'll have to admit that--without the cutting and pasting--configuring
DocBook, for the first time, requires a bit of work. It is not *very*
tricky, but *somewhat* tricky, I think.

Tarek.

-- 
Everything has been figured out, except how to live. - Jean-Paul 
Sartre (1905-1980)
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Tarek Ghaleb wrote these words on 08/30/05 21:13 CST:

 So, I guess I was talking about understanding how to set up catalog
 files and configure DocBook, etc., rather than just following
 instructions. I'm sure the instructions in the book about setting up
 DocBook are very clear, the book has been very easy to follow until
 now.

You say until now. This implies you are having some issues. Care
to explain them?

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
21:18:00 up 150 days, 20:51, 2 users, load average: 0.99, 0.96, 0.68
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: GNOME-desktop

2005-08-30 Thread Tarek Ghaleb
* On [31 Aug 2005 05:20 +0300] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Tarek Ghaleb wrote these words on 08/30/05 21:13 CST:
 
  So, I guess I was talking about understanding how to set up catalog
  files and configure DocBook, etc., rather than just following
  instructions. I'm sure the instructions in the book about setting up
  DocBook are very clear, the book has been very easy to follow until
  now.
 
 You say until now. This implies you are having some issues. Care
 to explain them?

Not at all, the book has been great. I'm just assuming that the more
packages I add, the more the complexity, that's all. But no issues,
non:-)

I've just gotten side tracked a bit, by wanting to use a packaging
management system. Now, I'm actually building the packages as rpms to
ease install/uninstall/upgrade and also allow me to replicate the system
on other machines. This has turned out to be time consuming, however,
and I'm still behind in the BLFS book.

Tarek.

-- 
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. - Martin Luther 
King, Jr. (1929-1968)
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page