Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-19 Thread The Fool
 From: Trent Shipley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 12 MYA: The last recorded wolfling race, the Paranaj, is discovered. 
Within 
 1000 years it is extinct.

 52 KYA: The last recorded wolfling race, the Paranaj, is discovered. 
Within 
 a thousand years, it is extinct. 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My .sig

2004-01-19 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

snipped to avoid copyright problems


The contents of this message © 2004 by the author.  All rights 
reserved.  Any reproduction, redistribution, duplication, forwarding, 
dissemination, publication, broadcast, transmission or other use of 
the contents of this message, in whole or in part, with or without 
attribution, with or without this copyright statement, in any form by 
any means whatsoever is strictly and expressly prohibited.²
What I'm trying to say is that in actual effect I cannot quote any of 
your message to reply to since it has been copywrited. If I were 
employed in a sensitive area I would be that carefull. Maybe you'll 
agree that this is a bit over the top. So although it is understandable 
I gues that this is probably not what you intended. :O)

Sonja ;o)
GCU: You'll never be able to prevent some from inflicting malice on you 
when they really have set their hart on hurting you or your loved ones.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Human Sacrifices Re: Shrub's Conspiracy to Invade Iraq Revealed by Ex-Admin Official

2004-01-19 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 06:05 PM 1/18/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
Judges 11:31 - 40.  Virgin Burnt Offering.

I'm glad to know that you put such stock in The Bible to believe everything
you read.   If I didn't know better, I'd say that The Fool is becoming a
Christian on us.  :-)

30 
Jephthah made a vow to the LORD.(2)   If you deliver the Ammonites into my
power, he said, 
31 
whoever comes out of the doors of my house to meet me when I return in
triumph from the Ammonites shall belong to the LORD. I shall offer him up
as a holocaust. 
32 
Jephthah then went on to the Ammonites to fight against them, and the LORD
delivered them into his power, 
33 
so that he inflicted a severe defeat on them, from Aroer to the approach of
Minnith (twenty cities in all) and as far as Abel-keramin. Thus were the
Ammonites brought into subjection by the Israelites. 
34 
When Jephthah returned to his house in Mizpah, it was his daughter who came
forth, playing the tambourines and dancing. She was an only child: he had
neither son nor daughter besides her. 
35 
When he saw her, he rent his garments and said, Alas, daughter, you have
struck me down and brought calamity upon me. For I have made a vow to the
LORD and I cannot retract. 
36 
Father, she replied, you have made a vow to the LORD. Do with me as you
have vowed, because the LORD has wrought vengeance for you on your enemies
the Ammonites. 
37 
3 Then she said to her father, Let me have this favor. Spare me for two
months, that I may go off down the mountains to mourn my virginity with my
companions. 
38 
Go, he replied, and sent her away for two months. So she departed with
her companions and mourned her virginity on the mountains. 
39 
At the end of the two months she returned to her father, who did to her as
he had vowed. She had not been intimate with man. It then became a custom
in Israel 
40 
for Israelite women to go yearly to mourn the daughter of Jephthah the
Gileadite for four days of the year. 


Footnotes

2 [30-40] The text clearly implies that Jephthah vowed a human sacrifice,
according to the custom of his pagan neighbors; cf 2 Kings 3:27. The
inspired author merely records the fact; he does not approve of the action.

3 [37] Mourn my virginity: to bear children was woman's greatest pride; to
be childless was regarded as a great misfortune. Hence Jephthah's daughter
asks permission to mourn the fact that she will be put to death before she
can bear children.



New American Bible Copyright © 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian
Doctrine, Inc., Washington, DC.

___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: NFL Championship Picks

2004-01-19 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 05:15 PM 1/18/2004 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
 We're rooting for the kickers right now -- they're up 13-12.  :)

Kickers won, 20-18.

   Julia

oh, and the Patriots will be heading to the Super Bowl, sorry, John...

I have one thing to say about this

GO PANTHERS!!

JDG ;-)
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: NFL Championship Picks

2004-01-19 Thread Julia Thompson
John D. Giorgis wrote:
 
 At 05:15 PM 1/18/2004 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
  We're rooting for the kickers right now -- they're up 13-12.  :)
 
 Kickers won, 20-18.
 
Julia
 
 oh, and the Patriots will be heading to the Super Bowl, sorry, John...
 
 I have one thing to say about this
 
 GO PANTHERS!!
 
 JDG ;-)

Before yesterday's games, I had decided that I wanted to root for
whichever AFC team made it, against whichever NFC team made it.

So I guess one of us will be disappointed.  (But at least, we won't have
*both* of us disappointed, right?)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: NFL Championship Picks

2004-01-19 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 11:53 AM 1/19/2004 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
Before yesterday's games, I had decided that I wanted to root for
whichever AFC team made it, against whichever NFC team made it.

So I guess one of us will be disappointed.  (But at least, we won't have
*both* of us disappointed, right?)

Well.yeah.My first read on this game is that I like the Patriots to
win big.   

Although the Patriots benefitted from some extraordinary luck in their last
Super Bowl run, the various breaks that have gone their way this year have
hardly been untoward.  They play exceedingly tough and hard-nosed football.

At any rate, the Panthers - while an incredilbe story of perseverance - are
also the beneficiaries of an extraordinary down-cycle in the NFC, as well
as the beneficiaries of being a division that should have been one of the
best in football this year, but instead fall flat on its face.I don't
think that the phrase just happy to be here has applied so aptly to a
Super Bowl team since the Chargers somehow snuck into the big game in the
mid-1990's.  

As for the game itself, the Panthers should really struggle running the
ball against the Patriots front 7, and I fully expect Bill Belichick's
defensive mind to thoroughly confuse and befuddle Jake Delhomme.   This
game might even end up as a shutout.

As for my heart, Boston got their Super Bowl win a few years back, and so
I'd be more than happy to see the plucky Panthers bring home a Championship
for Charlotte.

I won't, however, be holding my breath.

JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: religious/political question

2004-01-19 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 12:43 PM 10/30/2003 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
 More important
   than strength and intelligence in the character of an American
   presidential candidate is humility. Whatever one thinks of
   President George W Bush, he cultivates the same sort of folksy
   image that served former president Jimmy Carter so well.

I personally think that all of this owes far more to Cincinnatus than to
Jesus.

JDG - Jefferson probably had something to do with it too.
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


A Grand but Costly Vision

2004-01-19 Thread Erik Reuter
excerpt:

  But what makes NASA's human-spaceflight programme most unfortunate is
  that it consumes two-thirds of the agency's budget, and squeezes the
  scientifically useful things (such as the Mars rovers) that the agency
  does, and does well. That is likely to get worse with the budget
  reallocation that Mr Bush is proposing in order to pay for his plans.
  Last year, the House of Representatives' Committee on Science was
  warned that the net impact of people on a spacecraft is to greatly
  limit its range and capabilities, without adding any value that can
  begin to compensate. The best estimate is that putting people on a
  spacecraft multiplies the cost ten-fold. But nobody has taken any
  notice.



***

A grand but costly vision
Jan 15th 2004
From The Economist print edition


Publicly financed space-exploration should be about science not
political grandstanding


IN THE past week, plans for a manned lunar base, and a subsequent trip
to Mars, were leaking from Washington, DC, almost as fast as air from
the international space station. Was President George Bush testing the
water to see if his bold vision would be a vote winner? If that was the
plan, he would not have liked the response even before he announced it
formally in a grand speech on January 14th (see article). Despite public
delight at the success of the current robotic Mars missions, one of the
earliest polls (by AP/Ipsos) on the idea of returning humans to the moon
and then advancing to Mars suggested that most Americans think the money
would be better spent domestically. As one of those polled so eloquently
put it, You can't have a war, cut taxes, have the economy in a garbage
pail and spend billions going into space.

The proposals actually turned out to be more modest than the rumours,
though they do focus the efforts of NASA, America's space agency, even
more heavily on human spaceflight than at present. They involve an
extended human presence on the moon, in order to use it as a stepping
stone for human missions to Mars and to worlds beyond. But even modest
proposals in space can be costly. So although the big spending on these
ideas is actually scheduled for the never-never-land beyond the possible
incumbency of Mr Bush, it is still fair to question now whether they
would be wise things to do.

On the face of things, it does not appear so. Adding it up, human
spaceflight has cost America more than just the lives of astronauts. The
Apollo moon programme cost approximately $100 billion in 2002 dollars.
The shuttle has cost about $150 billion since its birth in 1971,
according to research from the University of Colorado. And the
still-unfinished space station has cost $25 billion so far.

Nor does anybody really know how much Mr Bush's proposals will end
up costing, and the bitter lesson of the past is that it is unwise
to believe the figure that is given at the outset. Tripling any such
number would be a start. Realistically, a 10-15-year return-to-the-moon
programme, if run by NASA in the usual way, would cost tens of billions
of dollars. For this cash, Americans will get to watch a handful of
people roam not very far on the lunar surface, and they will have the
huge satisfaction of knowing they have returned before the Chinese make
their first visit. As to the price of Mars and beyond, the sky is, as it
were, the limit.

Bottling moonbeams

Thinking optimistically, it is just possible that all this flimflam
is actually a cunning plan to scuttle the shuttle once and for
all. NASA has resolutely clung on to this old, dangerous and costly
vehicle. Part of Mr Bush's project involves ending the shuttle programme
in 2010.  Offering the agency the moon tomorrow -- complete with all
the flashy new hardware required to get people and materials up there
-- in exchange for a shuttle-retirement plan today would be a clever
ploy. Plans for running around the moon could then be scaled back by
future budget cuts. From the sound of it, though, Mr Bush means what
he says, and his plans look like the latest in a long line of bold
visions proposed to transform NASA.

Ironically, it was an obsession with the moon which got NASA into its
current mess. The original moon race was, of course, far more about
ideology than science. Money was lavished on the moon-shot primarily
to prove which system.communist and restricted, or capitalist and
free.would prevail. NASA's victory seemed to answer that question.

The riches of Apollo, however, are NASA's albatross today. The agency
was built, and remains constructed, in a mindset of central planning
in which it exists largely to spend lavish billions from government on
uncommercial and unjustifiable projects. But bold government visions and
expensive white elephants such as the shuttle and manned flights to the
moon do little to advance human knowledge.

Even many space enthusiasts now warn that only private enterprise will
truly drive human expansion into space, and yet America's government
keeps 

Re: SotU 2004 drinking game

2004-01-19 Thread Julia Thompson
Kevin Tarr wrote:
 
 http://www.drinkinggame.us/
 
 I think they left one off. I'm not saying this to partisan but what about a
 drink where they show a democrat not clapping; two if you can name them.
 
 Kevin T. - VRWC
 I'll start tonight

1)  I'm not drinking these days.  (Might make an exception sometime this
month, but not for SotU.)

2)  No tequila in the house.

3)  How soon do you have to stop messing with a Texan when he says
Don't mess with Texas!?

Julia

last drinking game I actually played was a Ranma drinking game
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SotU 2004 drinking game

2004-01-19 Thread Julia Thompson
Kevin Tarr wrote:
 
 http://www.drinkinggame.us/
 

Their countdown thingie is an hour off, BTW.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SotU 2004 drinking game

2004-01-19 Thread Kevin Tarr
At 08:37 PM 1/19/2004, you wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:

 http://www.drinkinggame.us/

Their countdown thingie is an hour off, BTW.

Julia


Not where the SotU is coming from. But I'm sure you knew that.

Kevin T. - VRWC
When does cycling season start?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SotU 2004 drinking game

2004-01-19 Thread Julia Thompson
Kevin Tarr wrote:
 
 At 08:37 PM 1/19/2004, you wrote:
 Kevin Tarr wrote:
  
   http://www.drinkinggame.us/
  
 
 Their countdown thingie is an hour off, BTW.
 
  Julia
 
 Not where the SotU is coming from. But I'm sure you knew that.

Yeah.  I e-mailed one of the guys responsible, and it just checks your
computer's time and assumes you're in the Eastern time zone.  :P

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: One more bit of ecconomic data

2004-01-19 Thread William T Goodall
On 20 Jan 2004, at 12:31 am, Erik Reuter wrote:

On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:14:41PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
OK, first analysis of income by 20% grouping and top 5%.

RR + GB^2Clinton
1st 20%   7.6%  15.9%
2nd 20%  8.9%  15.5%
3rd 20% 11.2%  14.6%
4th 20% 14.0%  15.8%
5th 20% 24.8%   28.8%
top 5%   40.7%  43.4%

The numbers don't exactly match with the GDP numbers for a couple of
reasons.
There was approximately 2%-3% greater growth in the numbers of
households under RR + GB^2 than under Clinton.
The share of the GDP growth that went to household income was greater
under Clinton.
That is fairly strong evidence in support of your contention that
Democrats are better for the poor than Republicans. Under Clinton, the
bottom 40% had approximately DOUBLE the rate of growth as under the 
best
8 years of RR + GB^2, as you said.

I wonder why JDG hasn't commented.
One wouldn't want to let contingent facts get in the way of revealed 
truth :)

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
It is our belief, however, that serious professional users will run 
out of things they can do with UNIX. - Ken Olsen, President of DEC, 
1984.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Kerry Wins Iowa

2004-01-19 Thread Robert Seeberger
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040120/D8069JTO1.html


John Kerry rode an 11th-hour surge to victory in Iowa's kickoff
presidential caucuses, upsetting Democratic front-runner Howard Dean
and stunning caucus favorite Dick Gephardt. Kerry's comeback blew the
nomination fight wide open, setting the stage for a free-for-all in
New Hampshire's follow-up primary.
Gephardt scrapped plans to fly to New Hampshire for next week's
primary after a disappointing fourth-place finish in the Iowa
caucuses, a source said Monday night, possibly signaling the end of
his presidential campaign.

I want to thank Iowa for making me the Comeback Kerry, Kerry said in
an interview with The Associated Press.

Two weeks ago, Dean and Gephardt were the co-favorites, but Monday
night the former Vermont governor was stuck in third. He pledged to
plow ahead, saying, on to New Hampshire. Gephardt, winner of the
1988 caucuses, was falling far short of the victory he needed to keep
his political career alive.

Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina was in second. It feels
terrific, Edwards said as he awaited the final results at a downtown
hotel. What's happened here the last two weeks with my campaign has
been phenomenal.

In an echo of Bill Clinton's line from the 1992 New Hampshire primary,
Kerry talked about his late surge.

We came from behind here, and we came for a fight here, and my
message is now to the special interest who call the White House home:
We're coming to you.

Just weeks ago, before the Iowa race turned testy and tumultuous, Dean
was the undisputed front-runner - and anything less than a victory for
him would shake up the crowded field, raising questions about his
Internet-driven organization and anti-establishment message.

Late-deciding voters turned away from mistake-prone Dean and his
signature position in opposition to the Iraq war did not seem to
resonate.

With 87 percent of the precincts reporting, Kerry had 37.9 percent,
Edwards 32.1 percent, Dean 18 percent and Gephardt 10.6 percent.

An AP analysis of the Iowa delegate count showed Kerry with seven
delegates, Edwards with six delegates and Dean with three, with 29
delegates still to be allocated.


xponent

It Begins Maru

rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: religious/political question

2004-01-19 Thread The Fool
 From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 At 12:58 AM 11/1/2003 -0600 The Fool wrote:
 Bullshit.  I ask again: Why should anyone consider a parasitic lump of
 undifferentiated cells any differently from a cancer?
 
 Because cancers are of the hosts genetic code, and because children are
of
 a unique and individual genetic code.

So should we consider mouth / intestinal bacteria to have human rights
because they have unique and individual genetic codes different from the
host?
 
 For someone who whinges incessantly about Orwellian NewSpeak equating
 reproduction with parasitism is one of the most incredible
 redefinitions I have ever seen.

Thats exactly what a fetus is.  My pet cat is also a parasite.  The
reproduction you cite is inherently parasitic.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Soro Religion

2004-01-19 Thread Trent Shipley
Are Soro Obeyors?
What about Gubru?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: 2004 Elections

2004-01-19 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I haven't yet commented on the 2004 Elections here
 on the Brin-L List.

snipped most 
 First, while the old cliche goes that you should
 never make the mistake of
 re-fighting the last election I think that
 cliche meets its maker this
 year, as the 50-50 nation holds and a very tight
 race ensues.And since
 a Democratic blowout is nearly inconceivable against
 an incumbent with a
 solid economy, and a Bush blowout isn't any fun to
 discuss, I'm going to
 base the rest of my analysis on the assumption of a
 close race, and my
 general assumption of Dean as the nominee with
 someone like Clark or Bob Graham as the VP.
 
I also think that it will be a close race; having
learned a bit about Kerry I think he'd be a good bet,
but of course Dean does have that solid grass-roots
base. Clark as VP also makes sense to me.  I'm pulling
for 2 of these 3 to be on the Dem ticket (but can't
call it a prediction b/c I'm going with my gut ;} ).

And of course I'm for a Dem win...  :)

 CO - Next time around, a massive influx of Hispanics
 and suburbanites may
 make Colorado competitive, but for now Bush holds
 onto this core conservative State.

Probably so; however ~70,000 jobs have been lost
state-wide over the past 2 years (and since 1939 there
had been job growth or stability), and bankruptcies
were at an all-time high in 2003.  The forecast is
modest improvement in 2004.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/business/article/0,1299,DRMN_4_2566224,00.html
...Economists and industry leaders say it's clear
that high-tech job cuts in Colorado have subsided
compared with 2001 and 2002, when layoffs flowed like
spring runoff and companies slashed hundreds of
positions in one swipe. 

The Denver area lost an estimated 13,000 to 20,000
net jobs in 2003, which is significantly lower than
the 40,000 net decrease in 2002...

...And although the national economy is improving,
it's not bringing jobs with it. Employers added just
1,000 jobs last month, way below the 100,000 to
150,000 analysts expected.  And Colorado's
unemployment rate is at 5.6 percent, up a bit over a
year ago...

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/business/article/0,1299,DRMN_4_2508342,00.html
...The forecast for 1.5 percent job growth in the
coming year will follow two years in which Colorado
actually lost jobs - the first time that has occurred
since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking
such data in 1939...


(This site has obvious bias, and their figure is
higher
-- 84K jobs lost in CO since Bush took office -- but
I include it for those who've heard the higher
number.)
http://www.ourfuture.org/docUploads/DENVER%20FINAL%20JOBS%20SHEET.pdf

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36%257E33%257E1863913,00.html?search=filter
Colorado residents and companies filed a record
number of bankruptcy cases in 2003, outstripping the
previous year's tally by 21.3 percent. 

Brad Bolton, clerk of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's
Colorado division, described Colorado's jump in cases
from 21,260 in 2002 to 25,786 in 2003 as the highest
percentage increase in the nation.  He does not
foresee a repeat this year.

For 2004, I do not expect the increase to continue to
accelerate at that pace, Bolton said. It's not
conceivable. We are already seeing a leveling off.

Several bankruptcy lawyers attributed the state's
jump in cases to a dramatic rise in personal filings.
Colorado's economy has struggled since 2000 amid job
losses, particularly in the telecommunications and
technology industries...

...Colorado's economy itself right now is lagging
behind most other states in terms of the recovery,
said Tom Connolly of Broomfield law firm Connolly,
Rosania and Loftstedt...

Debbi
who learned today that *another* person she knows is
getting laid off

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Soro Religion

2004-01-19 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/19/2004 9:39:41 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Are Soro Obeyors?
  What about Gubru?

I see the Gubru as being able to self rationalize any side their
leaders choose.

Unlike Earthclan, which grew out of such petty differences, it's all
a matter of color to the Gubru

William Tayor
--
Wow. A question on 
religion that shouldn't
ruffle any list tailfeathers.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Yellowstone Volcano Observatory

2004-01-19 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 In my travels online today, I ran across a reference
 that took me to
 another reference that eventually led me to the
 Yellowstone Volcano
 Observatory home page. There is some very
 interesting information here
 as well as some spectacular pictures and maps. One
 map in particular
 shows the areas of US that were probably covered by
 Ash from
 Yellowstone's last few eruptions over the last 2
 million years. I can't
 imagine just how catastrophic that would be today:
 http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/yvo/figures/fig3.html
 
 Yellowstone Volcano Observatory home page
 http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/yvo/index.html

From the above I clicked to
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/yvo/new.html

which has a nifty-cool bathymetric relief map of
Yellowstone Lake, and some FAQs about the 'bulging
bottom.'  :)

Yellowstone is utter-gloss to visit -- the geysers are
marvelous, the 'mud-pots' would make Pumba squeal with
joy (that, or cook him!), and the wildlife a
sure-to-see (bison  elk fer sure, and good chance for
moose, pelican, golden eagle or pronghorn).

Debbi
And Don't Forget The Wildflowers Maru

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: 2004 Elections (and Kerry)

2004-01-19 Thread Deborah Harrell
I wrote:

 I also think that it will be a close race; having
 learned a bit about Kerry I think he'd be a good
 bet...

I'd thought of him as rather lugubrious before, but I
was pleasantly surprised by the way he carried himself
on one of yesterday's Sunday-morning political show
interviews -- he seemed animated and much more
dynamic.

Thanks for the post, Rob.

Debbi
Boring Is Good Only If You're Mining Maru   ;)

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l