Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] intercom lines
I don't think it is expected. --- On Wed, 2/25/09, Cliff McGlamry wrote: From: Cliff McGlamry Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] intercom lines To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 6:11 AM When in SRST modeis it expected that intercom lines set up with IPMA are going to work normally across the WAN?
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] intercom lines
When in SRST modeis it expected that intercom lines set up with IPMA are going to work normally across the WAN?
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CE1T1-PRI
Thanks for you response. Was that a typo? You mean it doesn't tie in to any DSP resources? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of basant yadav Sent: 24 February 2009 23:21 To: r.ochi...@smoothtel.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CE1T1-PRI No Roger No voice features are supported on this Network Module. It does tie in to any DSP resources to be able to support voice and has no onboard DSPs capable of supporting voice. Regards - Basant On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Rogers O. OCHIENG wrote: Hi, I have the NM-2CE1T1-PRI card, i was wondering if this can be used for voice as i'm not getting the port when i try specifying the port in pots dial-peer I configured : ! Isdn switchtype primary-net5 ! voice type e1 2/0 ! controller e1 2/0 pri-group timeslots 1-31 no crc-4 no shut ! Interface serial 2/0:15 Isdn incoming-voice voice Isdn overlap-receiving No shut ! Dial-peer voice 1 pots Destination-p 2... Port 2/0:15 ^ Unrecorgnized command From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry Sent: 24 February 2009 22:18 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time management strategies I'm curious about how others are planning their time for the labs. In reading through the lab, it seems to me that it is best to go through and do all the drawings, dial plan design, etc. at the beginning. This means you might be spending a bit more time on it, but in my experience, an hour spent planning generally saves two or more. I'd be interested to know if other folks are doing their dial plan table at the same time they do their drawing of the network, or what. Cliff
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CE1T1-PRI
No Roger No voice features are supported on this Network Module. It does tie in to any DSP resources to be able to support voice and has no onboard DSPs capable of supporting voice. Regards - Basant On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Rogers O. OCHIENG wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have the NM-2CE1T1-PRI card, i was wondering if this can be used for > voice as i’m not getting the port when i try specifying the port in pots > dial-peer > > > > I configured : > > ! > > Isdn switchtype primary-net5 > > ! > > voice type e1 2/0 > > ! > > controller e1 2/0 > > pri-group timeslots 1-31 > > no crc-4 > > no shut > > ! > > Interface serial 2/0:15 > > Isdn incoming-voice voice > > Isdn overlap-receiving > > No shut > > ! > > Dial-peer voice 1 pots > > Destination-p 2... > > Port 2/0:15 > > ^ > > Unrecorgnized command > > > > > > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cliff McGlamry > *Sent:* 24 February 2009 22:18 > *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time management strategies > > > > I'm curious about how others are planning their time for the labs. > > > > In reading through the lab, it seems to me that it is best to go through > and do all the drawings, dial plan design, etc. at the beginning. This > means you might be spending a bit more time on it, but in my experience, an > hour spent planning generally saves two or more. > > > > I'd be interested to know if other folks are doing their dial plan table at > the same time they do their drawing of the network, or what. > > > > Cliff > > >
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CE1T1-PRI
Hi, I have the NM-2CE1T1-PRI card, i was wondering if this can be used for voice as i'm not getting the port when i try specifying the port in pots dial-peer I configured : ! Isdn switchtype primary-net5 ! voice type e1 2/0 ! controller e1 2/0 pri-group timeslots 1-31 no crc-4 no shut ! Interface serial 2/0:15 Isdn incoming-voice voice Isdn overlap-receiving No shut ! Dial-peer voice 1 pots Destination-p 2... Port 2/0:15 ^ Unrecorgnized command From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry Sent: 24 February 2009 22:18 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time management strategies I'm curious about how others are planning their time for the labs. In reading through the lab, it seems to me that it is best to go through and do all the drawings, dial plan design, etc. at the beginning. This means you might be spending a bit more time on it, but in my experience, an hour spent planning generally saves two or more. I'd be interested to know if other folks are doing their dial plan table at the same time they do their drawing of the network, or what. Cliff
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time management strategies
I'm curious about how others are planning their time for the labs. In reading through the lab, it seems to me that it is best to go through and do all the drawings, dial plan design, etc. at the beginning. This means you might be spending a bit more time on it, but in my experience, an hour spent planning generally saves two or more. I'd be interested to know if other folks are doing their dial plan table at the same time they do their drawing of the network, or what. Cliff
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2 Dial plan questions
Two questions about dial plan. In the V3 Lab 1 dial plan explanations, the need is discussed for the following patterns to support international dialing out of HQ and BR1. 9.011! 9.011!# If the CCM parameter to strip the # from Called Party Number is set to true (the default), why is the second pattern necessary? Second question: Incoming call from GK to HQ that is TEHO from BR2. The incoming string would be something like: 1#12125551212 The explanation discusses using a translation pattern to strip the 1#, but it occurs to me that you could just have 1#.12125551212 on a route pattern and strip pre dot. Is there something wrong, more time consuming, or something else with this approach? Cliff
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] TRP in CUCM7
Hi All This is slightly off the CCIE topic but I am looking for information on CallManager 7.0 and the trusted relay point. The is not much on CCO ro the SRND on how to configure this. Thanks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TFTP Server best practices
It should be spelled out, but if it isn't, generally best practice is Publisher runs TFTP server. Thanks, Ryan Trauernicht CCIE Voice #23497 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Chris Parker wrote: > What configuration should we use for the TFTP servers if it is not spelled > out explicitly in our lab? A single TFTP on the PUB? Or on both SUB and PUB? > I guess the safest bet is just to have it on on both? >
