[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE
Earlier this week, I began Vol 2 Lab 1. In this lab, I configured transcoding resources on the CUBE. These resources were registered to the gateway itself, under telephony-service. I was messing around on a router this morning and found something confusing. If I define "maximum sessions" under the dspfarm profile as well as "sdspfarm transcode sessions" under "telephony-service," the values seem to be considered independent of each other. I defined 45 maximum sessions on the dspfarm profile. Hower, when I run a "show sdspfarm units," I get a total of 90 max-streams. The two commands appear to be summed up in this command. Can someone explain this to me? sccp local Loopback1 sccp ccm 192.168.99.1 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 bind interface Loopback1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register RTR-XCODE signaling dscp ef ! dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 maximum sessions 45 associate application SCCP ... telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm transcode sessions 45 sdspfarm tag 1 RTR-XCODE max-ephones 1 max-dn 1 ip source-address 192.168.99.1 port 2000 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00 -- Matthew Berry A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written Vitals: GVoice: +1.612.424.5044 Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Skype: ciscovoiceguru Twitter: ciscovoiceguru Cert Stats: Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No More OEQs on RS and Voice Lab Exams
Hi Vik: So in your opinion, troubleshooting will gain weight in the lab section, but not so far as in RS in wich you have separate troubleshooting section Thanks Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:32:56 -0700 From: vma...@ipexpert.com To: siddas...@gmail.com; tanner.ez...@gmail.com CC: ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No More OEQs on RS and Voice Lab Exams I think the intention of what they originally set out to do was honest and fair. 10% (roughly) of the candidates sitting the voice lab were scoring 100% (or thereabouts) in half the time. Nobody should be able to perform to that level unless they see a repeat lab (3rd/4th attempt). So an additional check was required to protect the integrity of the certification. That much I’m sure we can all agree on (or at least 90% of us:-) They tried something and it failed to achieve the desired goal. That’s not the first time that has happened in life. Well done to the 360 team for not being so stubborn to pursue something that didn’t work out. The people that have suffered are the ones that prepared thoroughly and honestly and were clearly at the level that they deserved to pass but couldn’t remember a RFC # or couldn’t remember where xxx feature was on the GUI. The weighting for something so random was too much- it was too hit and miss. It would be better to have 100 OEQ’s and tell candidates you need 75 correct answers to reduce the randomness- but that’s not feasible on the same day of the lab. Life may well get more difficult now- inherent troubleshooting is being deemed a superior test of core knowledge than OEQ. The things they are going to ask you will most likely be more difficult to answer correctly and will require the same if not more core knowledge. On the flip side it won’t be closed book, you can be figure things out if you get stuck- something that was not possible on the OEQ section. Does that mean IPX customers are now going to ask us for troubleshooting sections in the WB? Probably. As Don Corleone said- “Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in” (developing labs). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat http://www.ipexpert.com/chat IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ From: Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:12:36 +0100 To: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Routing and Switching ccie...@onlinestudylist.com, OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No More OEQs on RS and Voice Lab Exams Even though I passed my OEQs in my first attempt but the weight Cisco had given to OEQs was completely unfair! It would have been much better that OEQs were part of the same lab section and have some points like any other section of the lab..if you answer all four question right, you would get 5 points, if you answer 3 right you would get 3 points and for correct answers 2 or less you would get 0 points..something like that...instead of giving all the importance to OEQs that if a person did well in the lab of 7.5 hrs and eventually passing that section but would fail just because he answered 2 questions incorrectly!! (even thou I agree that if you are well prepared you can answer all four questions but sometimes due to pressure and environment a little silly mistake is enough to book another attempt) _ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE
I think the number 90 was not b/c 45 (dspfarm) + 45 (sdspfarm), you had a value of 90 because each transcoder session consists of two transcoding streams between callers using transcode. Bo On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.comwrote: Earlier this week, I began Vol 2 Lab 1. In this lab, I configured transcoding resources on the CUBE. These resources were registered to the gateway itself, under telephony-service. I was messing around on a router this morning and found something confusing. If I define maximum sessions under the dspfarm profile as well as sdspfarm transcode sessions under telephony-service, the values seem to be considered independent of each other. I defined 45 maximum sessions on the dspfarm profile. Hower, when I run a show sdspfarm units, I get a total of 90 max-streams. The two commands appear to be summed up in this command. Can someone explain this to me? sccp local Loopback1 sccp ccm 192.168.99.1 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 bind interface Loopback1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register RTR-XCODE signaling dscp ef ! dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 maximum sessions 45 associate application SCCP ... telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm transcode sessions 45 sdspfarm tag 1 RTR-XCODE max-ephones 1 max-dn 1 ip source-address 192.168.99.1 port 2000 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00 -- *Matthew Berry* *A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written* *Vitals:* *GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044 *Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com *Skype*: ciscovoiceguru *Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru *Cert Stats:* Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3
Hi Segio Yes it is confusing isn't it. The columns represent the number of packets per dscp value. As an example there are 133518 packets in the best effort class (dscp 0) and 34243 packets marked with dscp 24. There are also 40177 voice packets, dscp value 46. Regards Peter From: Sergio Polizer [mailto:spoli...@hotmail.com] Sent: 7. mai 2010 13:32 To: Peter Weeks; ccievoi...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Peter, Thank you for your input. By the way, I always wanted to know what are the 5 columns for the sh mls qos interface fx/y statistics. Do you have it clear? sw-hq#sh mls qos interface f0/12 statistics FastEthernet0/12 (All statistics are in packets) dscp: incoming -- 0 - 4 : 1335180000 5 - 9 : 00000 10 - 14 : 00000 15 - 19 : 00000 20 - 24 : 000034243 25 - 29 : 0 8644000 30 - 34 : 00000 35 - 39 : 00000 40 - 44 : 00000 45 - 49 : 0401770356180 50 - 54 : 00000 55 - 59 : 00000 60 - 64 : 0000 From: peter.we...@datametrix.no To: ccievoi...@gmail.com; spoli...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 07:26:43 +0200 Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Hi! But you can see some statistics by using the sh mls qos interface statistics command, which will show both the queued packets and drop packets per interface per queue in addition to how many packets are matched per dscp value. In addition the show platform port-asic stats enqueue or show platform port-asic stats drop show the queues with thresholds or the dropped packet per threshold. I hope that helps. Regards Peter From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mad Kiwi Sent: 6. mai 2010 23:49 To: Sergio Polizer Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Thanks Sergio, That's what is was struggling to find last night. Regards Kiwi On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, This is the expected behavior. According to Catalyst 3750 Switch Software Configuration Guide, 12.2(44)SE: Do not use the show policy-map interface privileged EXEC command to display classification information for incoming traffic. The control-plane and interface keywords are not supported, and the statistics shown in the display should be ignored. HTH, Sergio. Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 21:40:17 +1000 From: ccievoi...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Hi everyone, I'm working through the HQ (3750) Switch QOS lab, where we use AutoQos, should I be able to see packet classification under the show policy-map interface statement? As far as I can tell straight out of the box Auto QoS isn't matching the packets. Any thoughts? -- Cheers, kiwi EM 2009 ACONTECERAM 250.362 FRAUDES NA INTERNET. CLIQUE PARA LER DICAS DE SEGURANÇA. -- Cheers, kiwi POR ANO SÃO ENCONTRADOS 609.000 SITES QUE ROUBAM DADOS. VEJA COMO SE PROTEGER AQUI.http://www.microsoft.com/brasil/windows/internet-explorer/features/navegue.aspx?tabid=1catid=1WT.mc_id=1565 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE
Bo - You're right. I changed the max sessions value from 45 to 2. This is the new output from my show sdspfarm units: mtp-1 Device:RTR-XCODE TCP socket:[1] REGISTERED in SCCP ver 17/10 actual_stream:4 max_stream 4 IP:192.168.99.1 57105 MTP Dixieland keepalive 0 Supported codec: G711Ulaw G711Alaw G729 G729a G729ab max-mtps:1, max-streams:90, alloc-streams:4, act-streams:0 Two values to point out: MAX-STREAMS remains the same. This is the number of sdspfarm transcode sessions I specified under telephony-service. You're right, in that xocde/mtp resources are counted as multiples of two. Since I stated 45 sessions, it lists 90 streams. ALLOC-STREAMS reflects the max-sessions listed under the dspfarm profile section of my configuration. Since I entered 2 sessions, it displays 4 streams (again, multiples of two). What I need pay attention to is SESSIONS versus STREAMS. Lastly, what the heck is MTP Dixieland? (second line of the output). That's weird. Matthew Berry Digital Footprint: Twitter: ciscovoiceguru Skype: ciscovoiceguru 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bo Gao [bga...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 7:22 AM To: Matthew Berry Cc: OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE I think the number 90 was not b/c 45 (dspfarm) + 45 (sdspfarm), you had a value of 90 because each transcoder session consists of two transcoding streams between callers using transcode. Bo On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.commailto:ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com wrote: Earlier this week, I began Vol 2 Lab 1. In this lab, I configured transcoding resources on the CUBE. These resources were registered to the gateway itself, under telephony-service. I was messing around on a router this morning and found something confusing. If I define maximum sessions under the dspfarm profile as well as sdspfarm transcode sessions under telephony-service, the values seem to be considered independent of each other. I defined 45 maximum sessions on the dspfarm profile. Hower, when I run a show sdspfarm units, I get a total of 90 max-streams. The two commands appear to be summed up in this command. Can someone explain this to me? sccp local Loopback1 sccp ccm 192.168.99.1 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 bind interface Loopback1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register RTR-XCODE signaling dscp ef ! dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 maximum sessions 45 associate application SCCP ... telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm transcode sessions 45 sdspfarm tag 1 RTR-XCODE max-ephones 1 max-dn 1 ip source-address 192.168.99.1 port 2000 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00 -- Matthew Berry A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written Vitals: GVoice: +1.612.424.5044 Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.commailto:ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Skype: ciscovoiceguru Twitter: ciscovoiceguru Cert Stats: Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE
Matthew, MTP Dixieland is the hardware reference: MODEL_DIXIELAND_CFB = 52, // Cisco IOS Conference Bridge (HDV2) MODEL_DIXIELAND_SW_MTP = 83, // Cisco IOS Media Termination Point (HDV2) MODEL_DIXIELAND_MTP = 112, // Cisco IOS Media Termination Point (HDV2) On older equipment: MODEL_YOKO_CONF_BRIDGE = 51, // Conference Bridge WS-X6608 MODEL_YOKO_MTP = 111, // Media Termination Point Hardware I had done research on this in the past, I thought they were some kind of music :) Bo On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Berry, Matthew J. mjbe...@krollontrack.comwrote: Bo - You're right. I changed the max sessions value from 45 to 2. This is the new output from my show sdspfarm units: mtp-1 Device:RTR-XCODE TCP socket:[1] REGISTERED in SCCP ver 17/10 actual_stream:4 max_stream 4 IP:192.168.99.1 57105 MTP Dixieland keepalive 0 Supported codec: G711Ulaw G711Alaw G729 G729a G729ab max-mtps:1, max-streams:90, alloc-streams:4, act-streams:0 Two values to point out: MAX-STREAMS remains the same. This is the number of sdspfarm transcode sessions I specified under telephony-service. You're right, in that xocde/mtp resources are counted as multiples of two. Since I stated 45 sessions, it lists 90 streams. ALLOC-STREAMS reflects the max-sessions listed under the dspfarm profile section of my configuration. Since I entered 2 sessions, it displays 4 streams (again, multiples of two). What I need pay attention to is SESSIONS versus STREAMS. Lastly, what the heck is MTP Dixieland? (second line of the output). That's weird. Matthew Berry Digital Footprint: Twitter: ciscovoiceguru Skype: ciscovoiceguru 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bo Gao [ bga...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 7:22 AM To: Matthew Berry Cc: OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trancoding resources on CUBE I think the number 90 was not b/c 45 (dspfarm) + 45 (sdspfarm), you had a value of 90 because each transcoder session consists of two transcoding streams between callers using transcode. Bo On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com mailto:ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com wrote: Earlier this week, I began Vol 2 Lab 1. In this lab, I configured transcoding resources on the CUBE. These resources were registered to the gateway itself, under telephony-service. I was messing around on a router this morning and found something confusing. If I define maximum sessions under the dspfarm profile as well as sdspfarm transcode sessions under telephony-service, the values seem to be considered independent of each other. I defined 45 maximum sessions on the dspfarm profile. Hower, when I run a show sdspfarm units, I get a total of 90 max-streams. The two commands appear to be summed up in this command. Can someone explain this to me? sccp local Loopback1 sccp ccm 192.168.99.1 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 bind interface Loopback1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register RTR-XCODE signaling dscp ef ! dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 maximum sessions 45 associate application SCCP ... telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm transcode sessions 45 sdspfarm tag 1 RTR-XCODE max-ephones 1 max-dn 1 ip source-address 192.168.99.1 port 2000 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00 -- Matthew Berry A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written Vitals: GVoice: +1.612.424.5044 Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.commailto:ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Skype: ciscovoiceguru Twitter: ciscovoiceguru Cert Stats: Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 837 for VPN to Proctors Lab
Can any one answer my question? thank you On 05/06/2010 11:37 PM, kerboute kerboute wrote: Hi guys, Can I use a cisco 837 router to setup VPN with Proctors Voice vRack? Regards Naoufal ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 837 for VPN to Proctors Lab
I believe you can, but you might want to run you question by supp...@ipexpert.com to be 100% certain. Roger Källberg Consultant Cygate AB Från: kerboute kerboute [naoufal.kerbo...@cbi.ma] Skickat: den 7 maj 2010 16:56 Till: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 837 for VPN to Proctors Lab Can any one answer my question? thank you On 05/06/2010 11:37 PM, kerboute kerboute wrote: Hi guys, Can I use a cisco 837 router to setup VPN with Proctors Voice vRack? Regards Naoufal ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 837 for VPN to Proctors Lab
You should be able to with the right IOS and tweaking the interfaces in the config file from IPX.I'm using 1861 with a single fastethernet port so I've done sub interfaces and vlans and it works. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of kerboute kerboute Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 5:57 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 837 for VPN to Proctors Lab Can any one answer my question? thank you On 05/06/2010 11:37 PM, kerboute kerboute wrote: Hi guys, Can I use a cisco 837 router to setup VPN with Proctors Voice vRack? Regards Naoufal ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unable to register IP Communicator to CME
MAC seems to be wrong. On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: Try the new CIPC version 7.0.3.0 as the previous one had this problem. Ash vccie2010 wrote: Tried with no-auto-reg too but no luck... Hope it is clear (:- here is my config... telephony-service no auto-reg-ephone max-ephones 2 max-dn 4 ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 May 07 2010 09:00:40 ! ! ephone-dn 1 dual-line number 3001 no-reg both ! ! ephone-dn 2 dual-line number 3002 no-reg both ! ! ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address 0021.5C74.216F type 7960 button 1:1 ! ! ! ephone 2 device-security-mode none mac-address 00FF.0043.428A type CIPC button 1:2 ! On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Roger Henderson rhender...@gmail.com wrote: Add no auto-reg-ephone to your telephony-service section. Roger On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:00 AM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: IP Communicator show as sh ephone output : ephone-2[1] Mac:F004.3428.A TCP socket:[4] activeLine:0 REGISTERED in SCCP ver 15/9 mediaActive:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:10 IP:10.10.0.43 2724 CIPC keepalive 0 max_line 8 Preferred Codec: g711ulaw I had the eph 3 already configured as below but somehow it show aboe eh 2 auto configured ??? telephony-service load 7960-7940 P00308000500 max-ephones 2 max-dn 2 ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000 dialplan-pattern 1 33132143... extension-length 4 voicemail 3600 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult server-security-mode non-secure create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 May 07 2010 05:37:49 ! ! ephone-dn 1 dual-line number 3001 no-reg both ! ! ephone-dn 2 dual-line number 3002 no-reg both ! ! ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address 0021.5C74.216F type 7960 button 1:1 ! ! ! ephone 3 CIPC configured manually device-security-mode none mac-address 00FF.0043.428A type CIPC button 1:2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unable to register IP Communicator to CME
I do have CIPC ver 7.0.3.0 please... On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:03 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: Tried with no-auto-reg too but no luck... Hope it is clear (:- here is my config... telephony-service no auto-reg-ephone max-ephones 2 max-dn 4 ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 May 07 2010 09:00:40 ! ! ephone-dn 1 dual-line number 3001 no-reg both ! ! ephone-dn 2 dual-line number 3002 no-reg both ! ! ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address 0021.5C74.216F type 7960 button 1:1 ! ! ! ephone 2 device-security-mode none mac-address 00FF.0043.428A type CIPC button 1:2 ! On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Roger Henderson rhender...@gmail.comwrote: Add no auto-reg-ephone to your telephony-service section. Roger On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:00 AM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote: IP Communicator show as sh ephone output : ephone-2[1] Mac:F004.3428.A TCP socket:[4] activeLine:0 REGISTERED in SCCP ver 15/9 mediaActive:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:10 IP:10.10.0.43 2724 CIPC keepalive 0 max_line 8 Preferred Codec: g711ulaw I had the eph 3 already configured as below but somehow it show aboe eh 2 auto configured ??? telephony-service load 7960-7940 P00308000500 max-ephones 2 max-dn 2 ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000 dialplan-pattern 1 33132143... extension-length 4 voicemail 3600 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult server-security-mode non-secure create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 May 07 2010 05:37:49 ! ! ephone-dn 1 dual-line number 3001 no-reg both ! ! ephone-dn 2 dual-line number 3002 no-reg both ! ! ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address 0021.5C74.216F type 7960 button 1:1 ! ! ! ephone 3CIPC configured manually device-security-mode none mac-address 00FF.0043.428A type CIPC button 1:2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No More OEQs on RS and Voice Lab Exams
Now is Official: http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/voice/lab_exam.html Update to the CCIE Lab Question Format Beginning May 10, 2010, CCIE Voice lab exams in all global locations will no longer include the four, open-ended Core Knowledge questions. The total lab exam time will remain eight hours. CCIE Voice candidates will have the full 8 hours to complete the integrated exam. From: gorr...@hotmail.com To: vma...@ipexpert.com; siddas...@gmail.com; tanner.ez...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 11:57:13 + CC: ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No More OEQs on RS and Voice Lab Exams Hi Vik: So in your opinion, troubleshooting will gain weight in the lab section, but not so far as in RS in wich you have separate troubleshooting section Thanks Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:32:56 -0700 From: vma...@ipexpert.com To: siddas...@gmail.com; tanner.ez...@gmail.com CC: ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No More OEQs on RS and Voice Lab Exams I think the intention of what they originally set out to do was honest and fair. 10% (roughly) of the candidates sitting the voice lab were scoring 100% (or thereabouts) in half the time. Nobody should be able to perform to that level unless they see a repeat lab (3rd/4th attempt). So an additional check was required to protect the integrity of the certification. That much I’m sure we can all agree on (or at least 90% of us:-) They tried something and it failed to achieve the desired goal. That’s not the first time that has happened in life. Well done to the 360 team for not being so stubborn to pursue something that didn’t work out. The people that have suffered are the ones that prepared thoroughly and honestly and were clearly at the level that they deserved to pass but couldn’t remember a RFC # or couldn’t remember where xxx feature was on the GUI. The weighting for something so random was too much- it was too hit and miss. It would be better to have 100 OEQ’s and tell candidates you need 75 correct answers to reduce the randomness- but that’s not feasible on the same day of the lab. Life may well get more difficult now- inherent troubleshooting is being deemed a superior test of core knowledge than OEQ. The things they are going to ask you will most likely be more difficult to answer correctly and will require the same if not more core knowledge. On the flip side it won’t be closed book, you can be figure things out if you get stuck- something that was not possible on the OEQ section. Does that mean IPX customers are now going to ask us for troubleshooting sections in the WB? Probably. As Don Corleone said- “Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in” (developing labs). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat http://www.ipexpert.com/chat IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ From: Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:12:36 +0100 To: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Routing and Switching ccie...@onlinestudylist.com, OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] No More OEQs on RS and Voice Lab Exams Even though I passed my OEQs in my first attempt but the weight Cisco had given to OEQs was completely unfair! It would have been much better that OEQs were part of the same lab section and have some points like any other section of the lab..if you answer all four question right, you would get 5 points, if you answer 3 right you would get 3 points and for correct answers 2 or less you would get 0 points..something like that...instead of giving all the importance to OEQs that if a person did well in the lab of 7.5 hrs and eventually passing that section but would fail just because he answered 2 questions incorrectly!! (even thou I agree that if you are well prepared you can answer all four questions but sometimes due to pressure and environment a little silly mistake is enough to book another attempt) Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. _ QUEM VOCÊ QUER SER HOJE NO MESSENGER? TRANSFORME SUA FOTO, É GRÁTIS.
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem in LAB 4.3 A vol 1
Dear, in this lab section we should add BR1-RTR as an MGCP gateway. I made the configuration AS Proctorlab guide and I got gateway register (sh ccm-manager) But when I (debug isdn q931) nothing appeared (I dialed as match as the Route Pattern) I attach the BR1 Configuration Please advice Amt THABT CCNP, CCVP ,CUSS,UCCX,CCNA, MCP BR1-RTR#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 3240 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 19:58:24 UTC Fri May 7 2010 ! NVRAM config last updated at 12:28:53 UTC Fri May 7 2010 ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker warm-reboot boot-end-marker ! logging message-counter syslog ! no aaa new-model memory-size iomem 20 network-clock-participate wic 0 network-clock-select 1 T1 0/0/0 ! dot11 syslog ip source-route ! ! ip cef ! ! ip domain name proctorlabs.com no ipv6 cef ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! isdn switch-type primary-ni ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! voice-card 0 no dspfarm ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! ! controller T1 0/0/0 framing esf linecode b8zs pri-group timeslots 1-3,24 service mgcp ! controller T1 0/0/1 framing esf linecode b8zs channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/0/1:0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF fair-queue frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet1/0 switchport trunk native vlan 130 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 240 ! interface FastEthernet1/1 ! interface FastEthernet1/2 ! interface FastEthernet1/3 ! interface FastEthernet1/4 ! interface FastEthernet1/5 ! interface FastEthernet1/6 ! interface FastEthernet1/7 ! interface FastEthernet1/8 ! interface FastEthernet1/9 ! interface FastEthernet1/10 ! interface FastEthernet1/11 ! interface FastEthernet1/12 ! interface FastEthernet1/13 ! interface FastEthernet1/14 ! interface FastEthernet1/15 ! interface Vlan1 no ip address ! interface Vlan130 ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Vlan240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.11 ! router ospf 1 router-id 10.10.101.1 log-adjacency-changes network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 ! ip forward-protocol nd no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0 mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0 ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet line vty 5 15 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet ! scheduler allocate 2 1000 end BR1-RTR#sh ccm BR1-RTR#sh ccm-manager MGCP Domain Name: BR1-RTR.proctorlabs.com PriorityStatus Host Primary Registered 10.10.210.11 First BackupBackup Ready 10.10.210.10 Second Backup None Current active Call Manager:10.10.210.11 Backhaul/Redundant link port: 2428 Failover Interval: 30 seconds Keepalive Interval: 15 seconds Last keepalive sent:19:59:23 UTC May 7 2010 (elapsed time: 00:00:04) Last MGCP traffic time: 19:59:23 UTC May 7 2010 (elapsed time: 00:00:04) Last failover time: 19:58:13 UTC May 7 2010 from (10.10.210.11) Last switchback time: 19:58:23 UTC May 7 2010 from (10.10.210.10) Switchback mode:Immediate MGCP Fallback mode: Not Selected Last MGCP Fallback start time: None Last MGCP Fallback end time:None MGCP Download Tones:Disabled TFTP retry count to shut Ports: 2 Backhaul Link info: Link Protocol: TCP Remote Port Number: 2428 Remote IP Address: 10.10.210.11 Current Link State: OPEN Statistics: Packets recvd: 0 Recv failures: 0
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem in LAB 4.3 A vol 1
Do a show isdn status. If you don't see MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED state under Layer 2 Status, then do a no isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager command under interface Serial0/0/0:23, wait a few seconds, then put the bind-l3 command back. I find this usually works (much faster than reloading the router). cheers, sd From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of amr gaber Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 4:42 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem in LAB 4.3 A vol 1 Dear, in this lab section we should add BR1-RTR as an MGCP gateway. I made the configuration AS Proctorlab guide and I got gateway register (sh ccm-manager) But when I (debug isdn q931) nothing appeared (I dialed as match as the Route Pattern) I attach the BR1 Configuration Please advice Amt THABT CCNP, CCVP ,CUSS,UCCX,CCNA, MCP ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab8 vol 2- PSTN PHONE NOT REGISTERING
Hello, My PSTN phone for lab 8 vol 2 is not registering Any one with similar issue ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem in LAB 4.3 A vol 1
If you reset the gateway and no mgcp, mgcp and still face the problem, reload the router. I get that all the time and I simply reload the router and it works From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of amr gaber Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 11:42 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem in LAB 4.3 A vol 1 Dear, in this lab section we should add BR1-RTR as an MGCP gateway. I made the configuration AS Proctorlab guide and I got gateway register (sh ccm-manager) But when I (debug isdn q931) nothing appeared (I dialed as match as the Route Pattern) I attach the BR1 Configuration Please advice Amt THABT CCNP, CCVP ,CUSS,UCCX,CCNA, MCP ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
