Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up home equipment

[Randall Crumm]

Thanks everyone!!



From: Michael Roger 
To: 'Rrcrumm' ; 'Ccie' 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up home equipment

You need minimum 7961 for plus dialing.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 7:09 PM
To: Ccie
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up home equipment

Hi
I'm setting up a switch, router and phones and the proctorlabs racks. I plan
on using 7960 phones because they are cheaper

Is there any reason to get  7961's? I'm just keeping the cost down

Thanks
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK failover call display

[ShinGei Yong]

What Alex describe is one of the reason that the "+" sign doesn't appear due
to the H323 native behavior.

Another reason is the GW ios version and the phone load. You may refer to
the below link on why proctor lab PSTN can display the "+" sign.
http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2010-March/066917.html

For your CME question, do a debug on isdn and ccapi inout, to confirm that
the number send by PSTN.
If the "+" doesn't tag along with the ANI, then you probably need to do what
Alex has mentioned earlier.

TIA
Shingei

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Adil Shaikh  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> I have configured route list with 1st choice as gatekeeper and 2nd choice
> as local PSTN.
> When I shut down the Gatekeeper, the call goes out from PSTN and back into
> branch gateway via PSTN as expected.
>
> debug isdn q931 shows the 'Calling Party Number' in +E164 format but the
> phone display calling party number without plus. The phone is 7965.
>
> Is this what you are getting on your phone? Is this normal behaviour?
>
> One branch site is H323 and other is CME.
>
>
> Thanks
> -adil
>
>
> --
>   .. . .
> _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com
>
> . .
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK failover call display

[Adil Shaikh]

Hi Alex,

thanks for this.

In AAR situation, when forwarding call comes in it shows the forwrding
number with + sign.

On procotor lab's PSTN phone which is CME phone also displays + sign. I
looked at proctorlab's PSTN-WAN config and i did not find any specific fix
they have done to display the calling party's + on the phone.
Proctorlab's PSTN-WAN ios is Version 12.4(15)T8.
While CME (BR2) site ios is Version 12.4(22)T1
and H323gw (BR1) site ios is Version 12.4(20)T1 <>


On CME, how do you fix the + for incoming callerid if the call comes in from
PSTN?

thanks
-adil


On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Alex Goh  wrote:

> Hi Adil,
>
> It is normal or expected behaviour where + sign will not be able to pass to
> h323 gateway, u will to prefix using translation-rule on h323 gateway or
> configured incoming prefix on cucm
>
> from the CUCM Help page you will see this
>
> SIP and MGCP gateways can support sending the international escape
> character, +, for calls. H.323 gateways do not support the +
>
>
> HTH
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Adil Shaikh wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I have configured route list with 1st choice as gatekeeper and 2nd choice
>> as local PSTN.
>> When I shut down the Gatekeeper, the call goes out from PSTN and back into
>> branch gateway via PSTN as expected.
>>
>> debug isdn q931 shows the 'Calling Party Number' in +E164 format but the
>> phone display calling party number without plus. The phone is 7965.
>>
>> Is this what you are getting on your phone? Is this normal behaviour?
>>
>> One branch site is H323 and other is CME.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> -adil
>>
>>
>> --
>>   .. . .
>> _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com
>>
>> . .
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>


-- 
  .. . .
_7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

. .
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK failover call display

[Alex Goh]

Hi Adil,

It is normal or expected behaviour where + sign will not be able to pass to
h323 gateway, u will to prefix using translation-rule on h323 gateway or
configured incoming prefix on cucm

from the CUCM Help page you will see this

SIP and MGCP gateways can support sending the international escape
character, +, for calls. H.323 gateways do not support the +


HTH

Regards,
Alex

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Adil Shaikh  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> I have configured route list with 1st choice as gatekeeper and 2nd choice
> as local PSTN.
> When I shut down the Gatekeeper, the call goes out from PSTN and back into
> branch gateway via PSTN as expected.
>
> debug isdn q931 shows the 'Calling Party Number' in +E164 format but the
> phone display calling party number without plus. The phone is 7965.
>
> Is this what you are getting on your phone? Is this normal behaviour?
>
> One branch site is H323 and other is CME.
>
>
> Thanks
> -adil
>
>
> --
>   .. . .
> _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com
>
> . .
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up home equipment

[Alex Goh]

Hi Randall

If I'm not wrong, 7961 and 7941 series support the + dialing from call list,
which probably you need it to practice the globalization/localization call
routing.

Regards,
Alex

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Rrcrumm  wrote:

> Hi
> I'm setting up a switch, router and phones and the proctorlabs racks. I
> plan on using 7960 phones because they are cheaper
>
> Is there any reason to get  7961's? I'm just keeping the cost down
>
> Thanks
> Randall
> Sent from my iPhone
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

[Bill Lake]

Your original configuration did not have a native vlan command maybe
the voice vlan does not work if there is no native vlan active.  Not
able to lab test to prove this but perhaps you could remove the
trunking commands and use switchport access vlan 1

Also remember that switchport mode access/switchport access vlan
x/switchport voice vlan x does not work all the time on HWIC modules
like the HWIC-4ESW



On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Mike  wrote:
> That did it, but shouldn't the command "switchport voice vlan XXX" create a
> pseudo trunk?
>
> This config showed dscp EF packets wireshark.
>
> interface FastEthernet0/3
>  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>  switchport mode trunk
>  switchport voice vlan 10
>  mls qos trust dscp
>  spanning-tree portfast
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Langenfeld [mailto:jlangenf...@prosysis.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 11:38 AM
> To: Mike
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue
>
> Try changing the mode to trunking.  802.1p priority bits are carried via the
> dot1q trunk header.  If you do not have a trunk or psuedo trunk to the
> phone, you will not get the COS bits, therefore you will not get the mapped
> DSCP value.
>
> Thx,
> Jason
> 
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] on behalf of Mike [mik...@msn.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:02 AM
> To: 'Peterson, Ryan'
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue
>
> I've tried everything:
> mls qos trust device cisco-phone
> mls qos trust dscp
>
> even full AutoQos and its not tagging packets.
>
> From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:58 AM
> To: Mike
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue
>
> have you tried adding the cisco-phone trust?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, "Mike " mailto:mik...@msn.com>>
> wrote:
> I monitored transmit and receive and the phone doesn't seem to be tagging
> frames or packets unless the switch is zero'ing them out.
>
> From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:44 AM
> To: Mike
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue
>
> looks like you are monitoring tx packets.  think you intended on monitoring
> rx.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:15 PM, "Mike "
> mailto:mik...@msn.com>> wrote:
> Hi all I'm trying to lab up a QOS run through and for some reason the switch
> is resetting everything to 0
>
> Switch config:
>
> mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
> mls qos
>
> interface FastEthernet0/3
> switchport mode access
> switchport voice vlan 10
> mls qos trust dscp
> spanning-tree portfast
>
> monitor session 1 source interface Fa0/3 tx
> monitor session 1 destination interface Fa0/6
>
> Wireshark reports DSCP field 0x00.
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
> I tried mls qos trust cos and same thing.
>
> The phone plugged into the switchport is a 7941
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
>
>
> The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
>
> intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
>
> whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
>
> not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
>
> PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
>
> the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
>
> communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
>
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
>
>
> The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
>
> intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
>
> whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
>
> not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
>
> PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
>
> the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
>
> communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK failover call display

[Adil Shaikh]

Hi all,


I have configured route list with 1st choice as gatekeeper and 2nd choice as
local PSTN.
When I shut down the Gatekeeper, the call goes out from PSTN and back into
branch gateway via PSTN as expected.

debug isdn q931 shows the 'Calling Party Number' in +E164 format but the
phone display calling party number without plus. The phone is 7965.

Is this what you are getting on your phone? Is this normal behaviour?

One branch site is H323 and other is CME.


Thanks
-adil


-- 
  .. . .
_7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com

. .
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up home equipment

[Rrcrumm]

Hi
I'm setting up a switch, router and phones and the proctorlabs racks. I plan on 
using 7960 phones because they are cheaper

Is there any reason to get  7961's? I'm just keeping the cost down

Thanks
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and CUE

[Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier]

Hi Randall,

In your cme you need this

Ip http server
Ip http path flash:  (path for GUI files for CME)

Telephony-service
 web admin system name administrator password cisco



De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de Randall Crumm
Enviado el: martes, 28 de junio de 2011 18:21
Para: Online Study
Asunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and CUE

HI,
I have had issues authenticating my web user in the setup wizard. My question, 
is there a certain sequence of CLI commands to make local authentication work?
I don't have a config to show but I do have compared my configuration to the PG 
config and they are exact.

I have even changed the password, although you can see it.

Thx
Randall
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and CUE

[Randall Crumm]

HI,
I have had issues authenticating my web user in the setup wizard. My question, 
is there a certain sequence of CLI commands to make local authentication work?
I don't have a config to show but I do have compared my configuration to the PG 
config and they are exact.

I have even changed the password, although you can see it.

Thx
Randall___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

[Mike]

That did it, but shouldn't the command "switchport voice vlan XXX" create a
pseudo trunk?

This config showed dscp EF packets wireshark.

interface FastEthernet0/3
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport voice vlan 10
 mls qos trust dscp
 spanning-tree portfast

-Original Message-
From: Jason Langenfeld [mailto:jlangenf...@prosysis.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 11:38 AM
To: Mike 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

Try changing the mode to trunking.  802.1p priority bits are carried via the
dot1q trunk header.  If you do not have a trunk or psuedo trunk to the
phone, you will not get the COS bits, therefore you will not get the mapped
DSCP value.

Thx,
Jason

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] on behalf of Mike [mik...@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:02 AM
To: 'Peterson, Ryan'
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

I've tried everything:
mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust dscp

even full AutoQos and its not tagging packets.

From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:58 AM
To: Mike
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

have you tried adding the cisco-phone trust?

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, "Mike " mailto:mik...@msn.com>>
wrote:
I monitored transmit and receive and the phone doesn't seem to be tagging
frames or packets unless the switch is zero'ing them out.

From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Mike
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

looks like you are monitoring tx packets.  think you intended on monitoring
rx.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:15 PM, "Mike "
mailto:mik...@msn.com>> wrote:
Hi all I'm trying to lab up a QOS run through and for some reason the switch
is resetting everything to 0

Switch config:

mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos

interface FastEthernet0/3
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 10
mls qos trust dscp
spanning-tree portfast

monitor session 1 source interface Fa0/3 tx
monitor session 1 destination interface Fa0/6

Wireshark reports DSCP field 0x00.


Any ideas?

I tried mls qos trust cos and same thing.

The phone plugged into the switchport is a 7941


Thanks,
Mike
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is

intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to

whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is

not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by

PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for

the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this

communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.



_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is

intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to

whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is

not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by

PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for

the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this

communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router Loopback 0

[Randall Saborio]

Cristobal, your statement is not correct. You don't need "ntp master".
Please try to make advice that you are sure of. Else it creates confusion
for the newcomers.

Have you read the explanation for that command on any of the "command
reference guides".

For the lazy people:

Because the Cisco implementation of NTP does not support directly attached
radio or atomic clocks, the router is normally synchronized, directly or
indirectly, to an external system that has such a clock. In a network
without Internet connectivity, such a time source may not be available. The
*ntp master* command is used in such cases.

If the system has *ntp master* configured, and it cannot reach any clock
with a lower stratum number, the system will claim to be synchronized at the
configured stratum number, and other systems will be willing to synchronize
to it via NTP.




On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Cristobal Priego <
cristobalpri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes both only if that router is an NTP master, otherwise CUE will ignore it
>
> i've tested this scneario multiple times and connectivity is not an issue
>
> your router could receive time form the pstn:  ntp server 10.10.100.2
> and if you want it to provide clocking to your netowrk devices you must
> make that router an ntp master, issue the show ntp associations command to
> check the stratum of the pstn clock and make the router an ntp master 7 or
> whatever
>
> otherwise CUE will ignore an NTP source that is not the service-engine ip
> address
>
> you
>
>
>
> 2011/6/27 Bill Lake 
>
>> I have tested this with routers but not with the CUE module.
>>
>> Routers will definitely pull their time from a router synced with
>> another NTP source.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Alan Gardner  wrote:
>> > According to Vik you do not need the NTP Master.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Try doing a no shut in the Service module interface!!!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Alan Gardner
>> >
>> > Chief Executive Officer
>> >
>> > Current Technologies Computer Learning Center
>> >
>> > PH. 219.764.3800
>> >
>> > agard...@ctclc.com
>> >
>> > MCT, MCSE (Messaging & Security), MCSD,
>> >
>> > MSF Trainer, MCNI, MCNE, MCSA, CCNA, , ITIL
>> >
>> > CCNP, CCVP, CCIP, CCDP, CCIE # 22758, CCSI
>> >
>> > A+, MCDST, Network+, Server+, IT Project+,
>> >
>> > EBIZ, CTT+, MCDBA CCNT, CISSP, CWNA, CTP, CIW
>> >
>> > Microsoft Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris
>> Martin
>> > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 2:27 PM
>> > To: sandeep.ra...@wipro.com
>> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router
>> > Loopback 0
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Believe you also need "ntp master" command.
>> >
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:56 AM,  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello All,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > When asked to configure NTP server for CUE as the HQ Router's loopback
>> IP or
>> > HQ routers Voice Vlan IP,
>> > should i configure NTP master command on the HQ router besides below
>> > configuration?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > HQ Router:
>> >
>> > ntp server 10.10.100.2> > ntp source loopback 0
>> > clock timezone PST -8
>> > clock summer-time PDT recurring
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I tried configuring the CUE module with HQ routers loopback-IP and Voice
>> > VLAN IP.
>> > But faced errors saying NTP server is not accessible. Can any one please
>> > tell me what extra should i configure on HQ router or CUE router in
>> order to
>> > get the NTP synchronization on the CUE successful.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
>> >
>> > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
>> to
>> > this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
>> may
>> > contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are
>> not
>> > the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy
>> this
>> > e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of
>> this
>> > message and any attachments.
>> >
>> > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
>> should
>> > check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
>> > company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
>> transmitted
>> > by this email.
>> >
>> > www.wipro.com
>> >
>> > ___
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> > Are you 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME octo line functionality

[Randall Saborio]

Ever seen this one:
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express System Administrator Guide  ??
(I'm sure I don't need to post the link)

Check examples "Shared Octo-Line Directory Number".



Shared Octo-Line Directory Number

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Cristobal Priego <
cristobalpri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I've been reading the blog about octo lines on cme
> however i still doesn't clearly understand how the max-calls-per-button and
> busy-trigger-per-button work and it's correlation to shared lines
> could you point me to a document or if you could, please explain that to
> me?
> I'd really appreciated it
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>



-- 
Randall "da ill" Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

[Mike]

I’ve tried everything:

mls qos trust device cisco-phone

mls qos trust dscp

 

even full AutoQos and its not tagging packets.

 

From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:58 AM
To: Mike
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

 

have you tried adding the cisco-phone trust?

Sent from my iPad


On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, "Mike "  wrote:

I monitored transmit and receive and the phone doesn’t seem to be tagging 
frames or packets unless the switch is zero’ing them out.

 

From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Mike
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

 

looks like you are monitoring tx packets.  think you intended on monitoring rx.

Sent from my iPad


On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:15 PM, "Mike "  wrote:

Hi all I’m trying to lab up a QOS run through and for some reason the switch is 
resetting everything to 0

 

Switch config:

 

mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

mls qos

 

interface FastEthernet0/3

switchport mode access

switchport voice vlan 10

mls qos trust dscp

spanning-tree portfast

 

monitor session 1 source interface Fa0/3 tx

monitor session 1 destination interface Fa0/6

 

Wireshark reports DSCP field 0x00.

 

 

Any ideas?

 

I tried mls qos trust cos and same thing.

 

The phone plugged into the switchport is a 7941

 

 

Thanks,

Mike

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 
 

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 
 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

[Peterson, Ryan]

have you tried adding the cisco-phone trust?

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, "Mike " mailto:mik...@msn.com>> 
wrote:

I monitored transmit and receive and the phone doesn’t seem to be tagging 
frames or packets unless the switch is zero’ing them out.

From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Mike
Cc:  
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

looks like you are monitoring tx packets.  think you intended on monitoring rx.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:15 PM, "Mike " 
<mik...@msn.com> wrote:
Hi all I’m trying to lab up a QOS run through and for some reason the switch is 
resetting everything to 0

Switch config:

mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos

interface FastEthernet0/3
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 10
mls qos trust dscp
spanning-tree portfast

monitor session 1 source interface Fa0/3 tx
monitor session 1 destination interface Fa0/6

Wireshark reports DSCP field 0x00.


Any ideas?

I tried mls qos trust cos and same thing.

The phone plugged into the switchport is a 7941


Thanks,
Mike
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is

intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to

whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is

not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by

PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for

the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this

communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip pim dense mode

[Peterson, Ryan]

you would not want that command.  it wouldnt matter if you had it since you 
would have had to enable multicast routing, but if you accidently did that, 
then the user could hear both CUCM and flash audio streams on their phone at 
the same time.

You would however need it if you were sourcing MOH from CUCM as multicast and 
trying to hop a layer 3 boundry.

Of course, Im not a big fan of using multicast routing in dense mode (in 
production).  Id probably setup RPs and Sparse mode.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:03 AM, "donny f"  wrote:

> hi all,
>  
> for MOH from  router flash, why we ever need this command " ip pim dense 
> mode" on router and swith interface.
>  
> Because we did not pass any multicast traffic, so why bother to put this 
> command ?
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

[Mike]

I monitored transmit and receive and the phone doesn’t seem to be tagging 
frames or packets unless the switch is zero’ing them out.

 

From: Peterson, Ryan [mailto:ryan.peter...@pcmall.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Mike
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

 

looks like you are monitoring tx packets.  think you intended on monitoring rx.

Sent from my iPad


On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:15 PM, "Mike "  wrote:

Hi all I’m trying to lab up a QOS run through and for some reason the switch is 
resetting everything to 0

 

Switch config:

 

mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

mls qos

 

interface FastEthernet0/3

switchport mode access

switchport voice vlan 10

mls qos trust dscp

spanning-tree portfast

 

monitor session 1 source interface Fa0/3 tx

monitor session 1 destination interface Fa0/6

 

Wireshark reports DSCP field 0x00.

 

 

Any ideas?

 

I tried mls qos trust cos and same thing.

 

The phone plugged into the switchport is a 7941

 

 

Thanks,

Mike

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 
 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up AA in Unity Connection

[None Ya]

You need a new "forwarded rule" It should be set to send anything received from 
forwarding number 5000 to go to the AA call handler. It needs to be placed 
higher in the list than the default forwarded rule.

From: v...@iinet.net.au
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:43:30 +1000
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up AA in Unity Connection



Hi guys I need help in setting up AA in Unity Connection. I have setup a new 
call handlers called AA in Unity Connection with the extension set to 5000 with 
the setup of the user inputs. In CUCM, I have created a CTI route point with DN 
5000, setting the CFA to voice mail.  The problem I am having is, whenever a 
phone in CUCM calls 5000, it goes to the voice mail greeting of the user “AA”, 
instead of presenting the user options.  I also noticed that the CTI route 
point in CUCM doesn’t registered to anything, but I am not sure whether that is 
the cause of this problem. Please point me the right direction? Cheers
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue

[Peterson, Ryan]

looks like you are monitoring tx packets.  think you intended on monitoring rx.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:15 PM, "Mike " mailto:mik...@msn.com>> 
wrote:

Hi all I’m trying to lab up a QOS run through and for some reason the switch is 
resetting everything to 0

Switch config:

mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos

interface FastEthernet0/3
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 10
mls qos trust dscp
spanning-tree portfast

monitor session 1 source interface Fa0/3 tx
monitor session 1 destination interface Fa0/6

Wireshark reports DSCP field 0x00.


Any ideas?

I tried mls qos trust cos and same thing.

The phone plugged into the switchport is a 7941


Thanks,
Mike
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up AA in Unity Connection

[Peterson, Ryan]

looks like you got it right then.

if you are hearing a prompt that the user is unavailable, it is because you 
havent recorded a custom prompt and CUC is giving you a made up one.  I assume 
you do not have an actual user named AA.

Attempt to use your caller inputs now and see whay happens.

The CTI is fine, but you could have just created a DN And forwarded all to VM.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 28, 2011, at 6:14 AM, "Vega Wong" 
mailto:v...@iinet.net.au>> wrote:

Hi guys

I need help in setting up AA in Unity Connection.

I have setup a new call handlers called AA in Unity Connection with the 
extension set to 5000i with the setup of the user inputs.

In CUCM, I have created a CTI route point with DN 5000, setting the CFA to 
voice mail.

The problem I am having is, whenever a phone in CUCM calls 5000, it goes to the 
voice mail greeting of the user “AA”, instead of presenting the user options.  
I also noticed that the CTI route point in CUCM doesn’t registered to anything, 
but I am not sure whether that is the cause of this problem.

Please point me the right direction?

Cheers




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
 www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How will i connect 4 phones using 881-k9 for Hardware VPN

[Pithog Oil]

Hi Experts,
Kindly assist on how i will connect my PSTN phone and 3 other phones with each 
phone from each branch site.
Which port on the 881-sec-k9 will i connect my laptop to.
Thanks for your assistance.
Pithog Oil.___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router Loopback 0

[Mini Me]

I tried this and it works without the master command. No need to add master
for CUE or anything else.

From:  Cristobal Priego 
Date:  Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:54:59 -0700
To:  Alan Gardner 
Cc:  "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Subject:  Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router
Loopback 0

you need the ntp master command on the router with the proper stratum set
otherwise when you go through the cue initialization and you enter the
router's loopback it;s going to say not reachable and is going to ask for a
different ntp server

2011/6/27 Alan Gardner 
> According to Vik you do not need the NTP Master.
>  
> Try doing a no shut in the Service module interface!!!
>  
> Best Regards,
>  
> Alan Gardner
> Chief Executive Officer
> Current Technologies Computer Learning Center
> PH. 219.764.3800
> agard...@ctclc.com 
> MCT, MCSE (Messaging & Security), MCSD,
> MSF Trainer, MCNI, MCNE, MCSA, CCNA, , ITIL
> CCNP, CCVP, CCIP, CCDP, CCIE # 22758, CCSI
> A+, MCDST, Network+, Server+, IT Project+,
> EBIZ, CTT+, MCDBA CCNT, CISSP, CWNA, CTP, CIW
> Microsoft Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator
>  
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Martin
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 2:27 PM
> To: sandeep.ra...@wipro.com
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router
> Loopback 0
>  
> Believe you also need "ntp master" command.
> 
> Chris
> 
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:56 AM,  wrote:
> 
> Hello All,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> When asked to configure NTP server for CUE as the HQ Router's loopback IP or
> HQ routers Voice Vlan IP,
> should i configure NTP master command on the HQ router besides below
> configuration?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> HQ Router:
> 
> ntp server 10.10.100.2 ntp source loopback 0
> clock timezone PST -8
> clock summer-time PDT recurring
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> I tried configuring the CUE module with HQ routers loopback-IP and Voice VLAN
> IP.
> But faced errors saying NTP server is not accessible. Can any one please tell
> me what extra should i configure on HQ router or CUE router in order to get
> the NTP synchronization on the CUE successful.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
> 
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
> this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
> contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
> e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.
> 
> WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should
> check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company
> accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this
> email. 
> 
> www.wipro.com 
> 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com 
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>  
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com 
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 

___ For more information
regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Setting up AA in Unity Connection

[Vega Wong]

Hi guys

 

I need help in setting up AA in Unity Connection.

 

I have setup a new call handlers called AA in Unity Connection with the
extension set to 5000 with the setup of the user inputs.

 

In CUCM, I have created a CTI route point with DN 5000, setting the CFA to
voice mail. 

 

The problem I am having is, whenever a phone in CUCM calls 5000, it goes to
the voice mail greeting of the user "AA", instead of presenting the user
options.  I also noticed that the CTI route point in CUCM doesn't registered
to anything, but I am not sure whether that is the cause of this problem.

 

Please point me the right direction?

 

Cheers

 

 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

[adam compton]

Originally, I had a computer running VM Server and an Athlon processor.
I've had tons of problems from not being able to start voice media service
and CTIManager service crashing everytime I try to use CUPS.  So I would
highly recommend getting an actual server that can run ESXi.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Bill Lake  wrote:

> I am running my CUCM Pub/Sub, CUPS and CUC all version 7 on a single
> intel quad core with 8 GB ram. I have found that if the VM's have
> their own HDD they perform much better.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Michael Thompson
>  wrote:
> > Make sure you're installing on an intel CPU.  Had major issues
> > installing to an AMD.  I needed to install on an Intel pc (running
> > server) the. 'export' to the AMD box. Once migrated it runs fine.
> >
> > On Saturday, March 21, 2009, Arun Kumar  wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I'm running CUCM 7 and Unity Connection 7 on ESXi with 6GB of RAM and
> 500GB of HDD and it's working fine. Not tested on Linux.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:44 PM, WorkerBee  wrote:
> >> Anyone has tried using ESXi with Quad core/8G ram instead of using
> >> VMware server on a Linux?
> >>
> >> Does ESXi gives a better performance?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
> >
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

[Julien Krieger]

Hi Bill,

What do you mean by "their own HD"?

Thanks

2011/6/28 Bill Lake 

> I am running my CUCM Pub/Sub, CUPS and CUC all version 7 on a single
> intel quad core with 8 GB ram. I have found that if the VM's have
> their own HDD they perform much better.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Michael Thompson
>  wrote:
> > Make sure you're installing on an intel CPU.  Had major issues
> > installing to an AMD.  I needed to install on an Intel pc (running
> > server) the. 'export' to the AMD box. Once migrated it runs fine.
> >
> > On Saturday, March 21, 2009, Arun Kumar  wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I'm running CUCM 7 and Unity Connection 7 on ESXi with 6GB of RAM and
> 500GB of HDD and it's working fine. Not tested on Linux.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:44 PM, WorkerBee  wrote:
> >> Anyone has tried using ESXi with Quad core/8G ram instead of using
> >> VMware server on a Linux?
> >>
> >> Does ESXi gives a better performance?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME octo line functionality

[cisco cisco]

Hi,

For my understanding/testing the eight channels of an octo-line are shared
between each ephone using them.
This  must be taken in consideration while considering
max-calls-per-button,busy-trigger-per-button and huntstop channel.

Making an example :

ephone-dn  7  octo-line
 number 3011
 huntstop channel 4

ephone  3
 mac-address ..0002
 busy-trigger-per-button 2
 Max-calls-per-button 5
 button  1:7

ephone  4
 mac-address ..0001
 busy-trigger-per-button 2
 Max-calls-per-button 4
 button  1:7


This will cause the following :

-Huntstop channel 4 will limit the number of channels used for INCOMING
calls for the ephone-dn 7 to 4 reserving the remaining 4 for outgoing
calls/transfers
-Users calling the ephone 3 will get a busy tone when 2 channels are used on
the ephone-dn 7 no matter where these channels are used, so it will get busy
if ephone 3 has two calls active, or ephone 4 has two calls or one call is
active on the ephone 3 and one on ephone 4
-Ephone 3 can use a maximum of 5 contemporary channels of ephone-dn 7.This
means that If no calls are active on the ephone 4 the ephone 3 will be
allowed to use all the 5 channels as long as they are not all incoming calls
as for the huntstop channel requirement which limits them to 4.But if  two
calls are active on the ephone 4 , the ephone 3 will have the chance to use
only three further channels.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router Loopback 0

[Peterson, Ryan]

I did this today and had no issues.  I did not need the ntp master command.

I did however experience the issues:

could ping CUE from my HQ router, could not ping HQ router from within CUE, 
could not get ntp to associate.

oops, int service-engine0/0 was shut.  I no shut and was able to ping and use 
the ntp of the HQ rtr from CUE.

Good luck!

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:06 PM, "Cristobal Priego" 
mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com>> wrote:

yes both only if that router is an NTP master, otherwise CUE will ignore it

i've tested this scneario multiple times and connectivity is not an issue

your router could receive time form the pstn:  ntp server 10.10.100.2
and if you want it to provide clocking to your netowrk devices you must make 
that router an ntp master, issue the show ntp associations command to check the 
stratum of the pstn clock and make the router an ntp master 7 or whatever

otherwise CUE will ignore an NTP source that is not the service-engine ip 
address

you



2011/6/27 Bill Lake 
<whl...@gmail.com>
I have tested this with routers but not with the CUE module.

Routers will definitely pull their time from a router synced with
another NTP source.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Alan Gardner 
<agard...@ctclc.com> 
wrote:
> According to Vik you do not need the NTP Master.
>
>
>
> Try doing a no shut in the Service module interface!!!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Alan Gardner
>
> Chief Executive Officer
>
> Current Technologies Computer Learning Center
>
> PH. 219.764.3800
>
>  agard...@ctclc.com
>
> MCT, MCSE (Messaging & Security), MCSD,
>
> MSF Trainer, MCNI, MCNE, MCSA, CCNA, , ITIL
>
> CCNP, CCVP, CCIP, CCDP, CCIE # 22758, CCSI
>
> A+, MCDST, Network+, Server+, IT Project+,
>
> EBIZ, CTT+, MCDBA CCNT, CISSP, CWNA, CTP, CIW
>
> Microsoft Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator
>
>
>
> From:  
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
>  On Behalf Of Chris Martin
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 2:27 PM
> To:  
> sandeep.ra...@wipro.com
> Cc:  
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router
> Loopback 0
>
>
>
> Believe you also need "ntp master" command.
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:56 AM, 
> <sandeep.ra...@wipro.com>
>  wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
>
>
> When asked to configure NTP server for CUE as the HQ Router's loopback IP or
> HQ routers Voice Vlan IP,
> should i configure NTP master command on the HQ router besides below
> configuration?
>
>
>
>
>
> HQ Router:
>
> ntp server 10.10.100.2 ntp source loopback 0
> clock timezone PST -8
> clock summer-time PDT recurring
>
>
>
>
>
> I tried configuring the CUE module with HQ routers loopback-IP and Voice
> VLAN IP.
> But faced errors saying NTP server is not accessible. Can any one please
> tell me what extra should i configure on HQ router or CUE router in order to
> get the NTP synchronization on the CUE successful.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
> this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
> contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
> e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.
>
> WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should
> check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
> company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
> by this email.
>
>  www.wipro.com
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit  www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>  
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit  www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRF.12 question

[Alex Goh]

Hi Duy,

Thanks I shall test it out and confirm. my understanding could be wrong.

Regards,
Alex

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:04 PM, ccieid1ot  wrote:

> Alex, definitely needed.  Test it out by enabling it on HQ router than
> don't enable on BR2 router.  Now open up the cue gui and see if it operated
> correctly.
>
> duy
> ccie #27737 voice
>
> tmobile g2
> On Jun 27, 2011 6:17 AM, "Alex Goh"  wrote:
> > Hi Shrini,
> >
> > I guess what cristobal trying to mean is when he is using class based
> > shaping, instead of FRTS which required the command on physical
> interface,
> > do he need to care about the qos setting between HQ and BR1.
> >
> > By the way, I have one question though, for the case when FRTS was enable
> on
> > HQ Physical serial interface, do we need to enable FRTS also on the
> opposite
> > site? I remember I tried before and WAN link isn't broken...
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Shrini  wrote:
> >
> >> **
> >> It looks like not effected but it is.
> >> The bandwidth drops to 56k.
> >> Good idea is to apply the Br2 service policy to Br1 connected srl
> interface
> >> even you not shaping the traffic.
> >>
> >> sh frame-relay pvc  will provide you the details.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Shrini
> >>
> >> On 6/26/2011 2:34 PM, Cristobal Priego wrote:
> >>
> >> hello all
> >>
> >> when you configure FRF.12 manually on your seial interfaces on HQ and
> BR2
> >> on the HQ router where the same physical interface is used to connect
> BR1
> >> and BR2, BR1 link isn't affected at all because traffic shaping isn't
> >> enabled on the physical interface, correct ?
> >> so i can pretty much ignore that link in regards to a basic QoS config
> if
> >> not needed
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>
> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com