Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 egress priority queue

2011-06-30 Thread Brian Mahler
Yes the Software configuration does indeed say that.   But A while back 
I ran into a problem that indicated otherwise.   I guess I just need to 
run a test case in the lab to verify it.  So for test questions go with 
what the book says.


Brian

On 6/29/2011 8:12 PM, adam compton wrote:
Not according to the 3750 QOS example guide.  It says if you have 
Priority-queue out on an interface, SRR is ignored for the priority 
queue, and it is serviced until empty.


On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Brian Mahler brianmahle...@gmail.com 
mailto:brianmahle...@gmail.com wrote:


My understanding is the the SRR Shaped command still applies to
the queue even though Priority Queue out is applied to the
interface.  It prevents the Priority queue from starving out the
other queues (that are shared).   Acts similiar to the Policy-map
Priority command on the routers.  The SRR shaped command set a
minimum bandwidth guarantee  on the remain queues.  Also similar
to the Policy-map Bandwidth command on the router.

Brian


On 6/29/2011 3:43 PM, adam compton wrote:

I've had practice questions that state to guarantee traffic for
the priority queue, but it also says shape queue 1 to 30%.  As I
would normally understand it, to enable the priority queue you
need the following command on a port:

priority-queue out

If you use this command SRR shaping and sharing is ignored for
the priority-queue.  priority-queue with that command is serviced
until empty, so no srr involved at all.  So how can I guarantee
traffic for the priority queue while also shaping queue 1 to
30%.  Seems like conflicting statements...

Adam Compton


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
visitwww.ipexpert.com  http://www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] What switches are there in the CCIE Voice lab? 3560 or 3550?

2011-06-30 Thread Divin Mathew John
Thanks guys! :)

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Did you check the blue print?

 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5292

 On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Divin Mathew John divinj...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
  www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE lose caller name

2011-06-30 Thread Ki Wi
This is not ccie question. 

I'm doing a integration with avaya.

CUCM 8.5SU1 via IOS GW to Avaya.
H323 is used between them.

When I use my ip phone and registered to IOS GW(cme). Incoming call from avaya 
I can see alerting name. However, if I register the same phone to cucm, I can't 
see the alerting name.

I guess so something must have happened between the cube to cucm. 

Alerting and calls are ok, 2 way audio. Calls from CUCM to avaya everything is 
fine. 

I have tried commands like h225 ccm compatible (can't remember the exact cmd) 
but it can't works.

Sent from my iPhone
Pls pardon my fat fingers.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 egress priority queue

2011-06-30 Thread Sam Park
Hey Adam,

As promised, here is the test you can do for the priority-queue out.
(Double check me on this, since I don't come from a RS background)

On my HQ Switch, I enabled auto qos on all the phone ports (trust phone)
On the uplink port to HQ-RTR (for me is fas0/23)
I set srr-queue bandwidth shape 65500 0 0 0 - which will make the effective
bandwidth for queue 1 to about 2 b/s

Make sure only cos 5 and dscp 46 is mapped to q1 thres 3, and all others are
mapped somewhere else.
At this point, we will test 2 scenarios on the uplink port.
1. With the priority-queue out command
2. Without the priority-queue out command

But before we continue…
Need to find your asic port number for the uplink port.
Use the this command show platform pm if-numbers
Then to see how many drops on that port, use this command.
show platform port-asic stats drop port 25  -my fas0/23 = 25
(these commands are in the Cisco Catalyst 3750 QoS Configuration Examples
at the very bottom)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a0080883f9e.shtml

So on with the test...

1. With the priority-queue out cammand scenario
Issue the priority-queue out command on the uplink port.
Make calls from Hq1 to BR1 and Hq2 to BR2.
Then run the show platform port-asic stat drop port # command again.

Port 25 TxQueue Drop Statistics
Queue 0  - this is queue 1
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 0   - no drops
Queue 1
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 0
Queue 2
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 0
Queue 3
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 0

On the BR1 phones, press ? ? to see send / receive packets.
they increment at the same rate.

2. Without the priority-queue out scenario
remove the priority-queue out command
Make calls again from 2 Hq phones to 2 BR1 phones.
Then run the show platform port-asic command again.

Port 25 TxQueue Drop Statistics
Queue 0
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 3960  = voice packets dropping
Queue 1
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 0
Queue 2
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 0
Queue 3
  Weight 0 Frames 0
  Weight 1 Frames 0
  Weight 2 Frames 0
  Supervisor TxQueue Drop Statistics

On the BR1 phones, press ? ? again.
You will see the RCVR packets either coming in really slow or none at all.

Conclusion:
Priority-queue out command will ignore what is configured on the shape for
queue 1, and service that queue until empty, as doc says.

The question then is:
What is a priority queue?  Not priority-queue or a strict priority
queue.  the documentation does not mention priority queue for 3750 outside
of enabling the priority queue out.
In older switches the p-q was able to be rate limited.  Wonder if the lab
designers are using that assumption.

Again check my sanity on this test.
Thanks

Sam
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can i Daisy Chain phones of Different device pool

2011-06-30 Thread Pithog Oil
Hi Experts,

Please i will like to know if i can daisy chain phones of different Device 
pools.

Thanks for you assistance.

Regards
Pithog oil
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats

2011-06-30 Thread Pithog Oil
Hi George,

Congratulations, i salute you persistence and determination.

You have been a blessing to the ipexpert community, thanks for questions you 
have answered and help you have rendered.

Victory deserved

Cheers

Pithog oil
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 egress priority queue

2011-06-30 Thread Emin Guliyev

Three different configurations are available for the switch interface. The 
configurations are bandwidth shape, share, and limit. You can also configure 
egress queue 1 as the priority queue. If the priority queue is enabled, SRR 
services it until it is empty before servicing the other three queues. However, 
in ingress priority queue, SRR services the priority queue with the configured 
value.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Mahler
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:34 AM
To: adam compton
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 egress priority queue

Yes the Software configuration does indeed say that.   But A while back I ran 
into a problem that indicated otherwise.   I guess I just need to run a test 
case in the lab to verify it.  So for test questions go with what the book says.

Brian

On 6/29/2011 8:12 PM, adam compton wrote:
Not according to the 3750 QOS example guide.  It says if you have 
Priority-queue out on an interface, SRR is ignored for the priority queue, and 
it is serviced until empty.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Brian Mahler 
brianmahle...@gmail.commailto:brianmahle...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding is the the SRR Shaped command still applies to the queue even 
though Priority Queue out is applied to the interface.  It prevents the 
Priority queue from starving out the other queues (that are shared).   Acts 
similiar to the Policy-map Priority command on the routers.  The SRR shaped 
command set a minimum bandwidth guarantee  on the remain queues.  Also similar 
to the Policy-map Bandwidth command on the router.

Brian


On 6/29/2011 3:43 PM, adam compton wrote:
I've had practice questions that state to guarantee traffic for the priority 
queue, but it also says shape queue 1 to 30%.  As I would normally understand 
it, to enable the priority queue you need the following command on a port:

priority-queue out

If you use this command SRR shaping and sharing is ignored for the 
priority-queue.  priority-queue with that command is serviced until empty, so 
no srr involved at all.  So how can I guarantee traffic for the priority 
queue while also shaping queue 1 to 30%.  Seems like conflicting statements...

Adam Compton



___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com





Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 228

2011-06-30 Thread shelesh
Congratulation Man, you really deserve it, I know you help me lot that day.
God bless you. I am very happy.
Please be in touch in forum.

Shelesh

 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6033 (20110411) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE in SRST.. Failover and Fall back

2011-06-30 Thread Cristobal Priego

If you test failover by stopping the ccm  service, it is expected
If you shut down the wan ports the ports should register back
Enviado desde mi iPhone

El Jun 29, 2011, a las 21:06, sandeep.ra...@wipro.com escribió:


Hi All,

I have CUE in SRST mode and it works fine, but when i bring back  
CUCM i dont see the CTI Route point and CTI ports getting registered  
at all unless i reboot the CUE module.


Is this the way it normally behaves or am i unaware of some  
configuration to fix this behaviour.


Also can you please jot down few points on how should i configure  
CUE in SRST mode.


Thanks
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

The information contained in this electronic message and any  
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of  
the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or  
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you  
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please  
notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message  
and any attachments.


WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The  
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the  
presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage  
caused by any virus transmitted by this email.


www.wipro.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com


Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Drop Through

2011-06-30 Thread Pablo Meneses
Hi experts,

Is there a way to display 1 call on phone when using B-ACD Drop Through?

I think that it will display 1 call on queue and that there is no way for
it to display 1 call on phone, but, I better ask.

Regards,

-Pablo Meneses.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats

2011-06-30 Thread adam compton
George,

You are tenacious like Bull!
Peggy
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote:

   Hi George,

 Congratulations, i salute you persistence and determination.

 You have been a blessing to the ipexpert community, thanks for questions
 you have answered and help you have rendered.

 Victory deserved

 Cheers

 Pithog oil

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats

2011-06-30 Thread Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier
Congratulations

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de adam compton
Enviado el: jueves, 30 de junio de 2011 18:52
Para: gogli...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats

George,

You are tenacious like Bull!
Peggy
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Pithog Oil 
pithog...@yahoo.commailto:pithog...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi George,

Congratulations, i salute you persistence and determination.

You have been a blessing to the ipexpert community, thanks for questions you 
have answered and help you have rendered.

Victory deserved

Cheers

Pithog oil


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Cristobal Priego
Hello all

for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which one is the best
approach

switchport trunk encap dotq1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan XX
switchport voice vlan XX
spanning-tree portfast trunk
mls qos trust cos

or

switchport mode acess
switchport access vlan XX
switchport voice vlan XX
spanning-tree portfast ?
mls qos trust cos


This links shows how to configure ESW on ISR 2800 ios 12.4(T)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuration_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4


any comments ?
I'd really appreciate those

thanks
wheneve
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Bill Lake
Definitely


switchport trunk encap dotq1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan XX
switchport voice vlan XX
spanning-tree portfast trunk
mls qos trust cos

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Cristobal Priego
cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello all

 for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which one is the best
 approach

 switchport trunk encap dotq1
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport trunk native vlan XX
 switchport voice vlan XX
 spanning-tree portfast trunk
 mls qos trust cos

 or

 switchport mode acess
 switchport access vlan XX
 switchport voice vlan XX
 spanning-tree portfast ?
 mls qos trust cos


 This links shows how to configure ESW on ISR 2800 ios 12.4(T)
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuration_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4


 any comments ?
 I'd really appreciate those

 thanks
 wheneve


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Peterson, Ryan
I would personally keep it as simple as possible unless the book tells you to 
add something else...

switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan XX   Add only if it tells you to have a PC 
behind the phone.
switchport voice vlan XX

I would not go with the access method unless spanning-tree portfast is a 
requirement as access on ESW is not stable.

Good luck!

Ryan



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 7:03 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

Hello all

for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which one is the best approach

switchport trunk encap dotq1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan XX
switchport voice vlan XX
spanning-tree portfast trunk
mls qos trust cos

or

switchport mode acess
switchport access vlan XX
switchport voice vlan XX
spanning-tree portfast ?
mls qos trust cos


This links shows how to configure ESW on ISR 2800 ios 12.4(T)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuration_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4


any comments ?
I'd really appreciate those

thanks
wheneve
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Cristobal Priego
thank you guys


2011/6/30 Peterson, Ryan ryan.peter...@pcmall.com

 I would personally keep it as simple as possible unless the book tells you
 to add something else…

 ** **

 switchport mode trunk
 switchport trunk native vlan XX   Add only if it tells you to have a PC
 behind the phone.
 switchport voice vlan XX

 ** **

 I would not go with the access method unless spanning-tree portfast is a
 requirement as access on ESW is not stable.

 ** **

 Good luck!

 ** **

 Ryan

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cristobal Priego
 *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2011 7:03 PM
 *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

 ** **

 Hello all

 for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which one is the best
 approach

 switchport trunk encap dotq1
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport trunk native vlan XX
 switchport voice vlan XX
 spanning-tree portfast trunk
 mls qos trust cos

 or

 switchport mode acess
 switchport access vlan XX
 switchport voice vlan XX
 spanning-tree portfast ?
 mls qos trust cos


 This links shows how to configure ESW on ISR 2800 ios 12.4(T)

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuration_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4


 any comments ?
 I'd really appreciate those

 thanks
 wheneve

 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

 The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
 intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
 whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
 not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
 PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
 the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
 communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com