Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cti route point isnot registering
If this is for CUE integration , restarting cti service in CUCM will resolve issue. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.com wrote: Amit, If this Route Point is meant for UCCX which you created from UCCX and still does not show as registered on CM, ensure that the Route Point shows under Controlled Devices section of the JTAPI application user on the CM created for UCCX. Gurpreet On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Amit Sharma aryan231...@gmail.comwrote: dear guys i create the cti route point,..but not registering... how can register it? -- Thanks Regard's Amit Sharma ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaberation
Finally Cisco understood the mistake corrected it before further complications begin. One guy passed RS v.2 lab later passed RS v.3 lab finally passed RS v.4 lab. He is a true expert in RS but not counted as a dual / triple CCIE for partner status. Now cisco had to offer dual / triple / quadruple CCIE status for single track CCIE s as well. Before things get complicated , luckily Cisco corrected the mistake. On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:57 PM, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.comwrote: This is really awesome news. Now we can go on with more enthusiasm. Thank you all. Khaled -- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:35:01 +0300 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaberation From: aryan231...@gmail.com To: khaled_sah...@hotmail.com yes! cisco approved to ccie voice to become collaboration with written exam... On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:25 PM, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi friends, Any news on our subject!! Regards. khaled -- From: hugo.barr...@nexusis.com To: whl...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:12:43 + CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaberation Well spoken Bill 100% agree. Regards, Hugo On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: Right you can continue to pass written exams and prove you are current with technology. But what will you do when you apply for a job that requires or desires CCIE Collaboration? CCIE voice will join the CCIE's of the pass that were retired, you will still be a CCIE but you will be considered less important because your CCIE is on outdated technology, like CCIE ISP Dial or CCIE SNA/IP integration do you see anyone asking for them now? So I would prefer to have a grandfather or upgrade path instead of having to take the CCIE Collaboration exam For those that say why not just get dual CCIE with CCIE Collaboration as it should be easy, name the people who say their CCIE was easy and would gladly pay 1500 more to take it again just to renew their current CCIE. No if I want to get a dual CCIE, I want to earn it in another track, not another voice or communications centric track Bill On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Wonder what this means…. ** ** http://ciscocert.force.com/english/articles/Article/CCIE-Collaboration-Certification-CCIE-Voice-can-be-recertified-EN?retURL=/english/apex/instantanswers?productCategory%3DCCIE_collaborationpopup=false http://ciscocert.force.com/english/articles/Article/CCIE-Collaboration-Certification-CCIE-Voice-can-be-recertified-EN?retURL=%2Fenglish%2Fapex%2Finstantanswers%3FproductCategory%3DCCIE_collaborationpopup=falsehttp://ciscocert.force.com/english/articles/Article/CCIE-Collaboration-Certification-CCIE-Voice-can-be-recertified-EN?retURL=/english/apex/instantanswers?productCategory%3DCCIE_collaborationpopup=false ** ** ** ** The CCIE Collaboration certification does not directly affect current CCIE Voice certification holders. Current CCIE Voice holders will be able to recertify by passing any CCIE exam including the new CCIE *Collaboration written or lab exams*. The CCIE Collaboration certification provides new career opportunities for CCIE Voice certification holders ** ** ** ** *Leslie Meade* image001.jpg Bach Information Technology CCNA CCVP CCIE Voice 38727 Network Consultant .. * Mobile:778.228.4339* | *Main:* *604.676.5239* *Email:* leslie.me...@lvs1.com image002.jpg http://www.linkedin.com/company/17908 image003.jpghttp://twitter.com/LongViewSystems image004.jpg http://www.facebook.com/longviewsystems image005.jpghttp://gplus.to/longviewsystems image006.jpg http://www.youtube.com/longviewsystemsimage007.gif www.longviewsystems.com This message and any attached documents are only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, retransmission, or other disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify the sender immediately, and delete the original message. ** ** ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
There's a serious fault with this new announcement.
We can't say this new blueprint as CCIE Collaboration it should be CCIE
Voice version 4. CCIE Voice track should be allowed to continue with this
new v4 blueprint.
If Cisco want to add another CCIE Collaboration Track they have to add
additional products such as WebEx Server , VCS , Telepresence MSE ,
Telepresence Multipoint Switch , Telepresence Server , Telepresence Manager
, TMS suitable endpoints.
Then current CCIE Voice guys will be more than happy to complete their
Collaboration certification become dual CCIEs. It will be definitely a
career advancement path for them.
If Cisco can call this new blueprint as CCIE Collaboration ; why can't
they call all current voice CCIE's as Collaboration CCIEs.?
Ken
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Mohammed Al-Assadi
m_alass...@hotmail.comwrote:
Ben e-mail
be...@cisco.com
From: brian.sch...@vitalsite.com
To: rrcr...@yahoo.com; leslie.me...@lvs1.com
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:29:14 +
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
It is Ben Ng. Found his linked in profile below which describes his
position in Cisco.
www.linkedin.com/pub/ben-ng/3/509/940
Profile on the Cisco site.
https://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le31/communities/netpro/bios/benng.html
Anyone have better contact info to send him respectful and thoughtful
arguments on this?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:11 AM
To: Leslie Meade
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; vma...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
Ben Ng comes to mind
On May 29, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote:
The question is... what if anything can we do ?
Where would we start..
Original message
From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
Date:
To: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com
Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,Vik Malhi
vma...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially
announced
Granted we all know that taking any CCIE Written will allow us to
remain CCIE's even if Voice is retired, but I think the frustration is
Voice and Collaboration are not THAT far apart and no matter how you look
at it, it all falls under Cisco Unified Communications, which is what the
name of the new CCIE really should be anyway. The core of the Voice
blueprint is still there. The Collaboration equipment list looks like a
refresh of current products, not a forklift of one technology replacing
another.
In my opinion this was too harsh of a move to retire Voice and start
over again with Collaboration. There are too many similarities between the
two.
On May 29, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto:
whl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ranting about it won't change anything. I read on line that when they
retire your CCIE, you can still renew by passing a CCIE level written or
lab. If this is true then you do not loose your CCIE just the voice tag.
That seems to be a difficult pill to swallow but it would not be the
first from my reading. Storage had this happen earlier this year as have
several others. See here with the snippet. Now the second is a wiki so we
would want official confirmation.
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17226
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Career_Certifications#Retired_CCIE_
tracks
Retired CCIE tracks
Some previously awarded CCIE specializations have been retired by
Cisco. These are:
* WAN Switching CCIE (Essentially a specialisation focusing on the
IGX/BPX switch products, which had been acquired as part of the StrataCom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrataCom acquisition)
* ISP Dial CCIE
* SNA/IP Integration CCIE (aka CCIE Blue)
* Design CCIE (NOTE: The CCIE Design and CCDE are completely different
design tests in format and subjects examined)
People who hold these now-retired certifications can remain CCIEs,
provided they continue to take recertification exams. They now hold the
title CCIE, rather than CCIE Security, or some other specialization.
So if we can get official confirmation that we won't be stripped of
CCIE if you pass the voice lab, it might be good, for those of us that have
already passed we don't get a chance to change our minds for those that
have yet to pass, this might be incentive to change your goal.
Bill
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, m george m.george00...@gmail.com
mailto:m.george00...@gmail.com wrote:
Vik,
A 2nd grader can pass RS/Sec/SP much much easier than Voice IE. Voice
is still the toughest one i know some double IE's who couldn't pass
Voice. If
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [QOS Question - To get proper understanding]
Question 1 is not clear. Question 2 : any any eq 5060 This is destination port any eq 5060 any - This is source port On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:06 AM, ie ravindra ieravin...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Experts, What is the mostly recommended way to mark all in/out traffic to specific ip including protocol. Assuming, we required to match all sip traffic which goes and in and out from specific port and at the same time it requires to match the source and destination as to be identified. Question 1 : Please mark down all the sip traffic from CUCM which goes in and out to service provider [X1] but at the same time sip traffice goes out to the X2 through same port should not be marked. Question 2: I am not clear about the below usage in access-list.. ip access-list extended SIP permit tcp any any eq 5060 permit tcp any eq 5060 any What is the differance between* any any eq 5060 /** **any eq 5060 any * Thanks, Ravi. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks
Hi CCIEing Please send an email to supp...@ipexpert.com / supp...@proctorlabs.com or use chat window from IPExpert.com site during office hours. Support guys seems using different methods to combine sessions. Sometimes they extend end time in same session for another time slot. Sometimes they extend current session upto start of next session in same pod (to avoid automatic POD initialization in last 15 min). Sometimes they can successfully extend it in the last hour of session as well. One time I sent an email ( raised a ticket) few hours before end of session to extend. Unluckily they responded in last 30 min did extension , but automated scripts cleared my configs in the middle due to late extension. It's good to plan how many sessions we need in advance book early. IPExpert should have an escalation method if support Engineer doesn't respond within a reasonable time. Ken Wyan On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.comwrote: I have to agree with Bill ... I ALWAYS send an email to the support to confirm if my session are indeed linked ! Nic Le Wednesday, April 17, 2013 8:01:00 AM, Mohamed Gazzaz a écrit : Hello, I am copying the support team. They will clarify this issue for us. Regards, Mohamed Gazzaz --**--** From: ahmad_tam...@hotmail.com Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:45:21 +0300 To: ejzi...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks Is there any specific email for the support ? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.com mailto:ejzi...@gmail.com wrote: I've done it many times just ask them to join your sessions, the support team has always been great about doing it when you give them enough time and if racks are available Edgar On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Bill whl...@gmail.com mailto:whl...@gmail.com wrote: You need to verify as in the past this did not always work. Not sure how the new scheduling works Sent from my iPad On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:27 PM, Mohamed Gazzaz mgaz...@hotmail.com mailto:mgaz...@hotmail.com wrote: The two sessions are linked automatically when you book B2B sessions and your configuration stays. You can ask support for more clarification. --** --** Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:43:16 +0300 From: aboaz...@gmail.com mailto:aboaz...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@**onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks Dears,, When I reserve a back to back racks sessions , does the pod number changed? does my configuration removed one I go from one time session to the next one Appreciated __**_ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.**comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com __**_ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.**comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com __**_ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.**comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com __**_ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.**comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com __**_ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com __**_ For more information
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks
After starting session we may need to extend the session, in that case we need to give them few hours , oherwise it won't work On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.com wrote: I've done it many times just ask them to join your sessions, the support team has always been great about doing it when you give them enough time and if racks are available Edgar On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Bill whl...@gmail.com wrote: You need to verify as in the past this did not always work. Not sure how the new scheduling works Sent from my iPad On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:27 PM, Mohamed Gazzaz mgaz...@hotmail.com wrote: The two sessions are linked automatically when you book B2B sessions and your configuration stays. You can ask support for more clarification. -- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:43:16 +0300 From: aboaz...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Back to back session IPexperts racks Dears,, When I reserve a back to back racks sessions , does the pod number changed? does my configuration removed one I go from one time session to the next one Appreciated ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [PSTN Dial Patterns | Standardization]
Hi, There's no such standard way of sending called number by carriers upto customer isdn gateway router. I have seen some telcos send only extension number of DID block some carriers send full subscriber or national number. We have to configure our VoIP Gateways accordingly. Calling Number is usually in e164 format (starting from + sign). But I have seen some SIP ITSPs send calling number as received from customer without modifying it. Sorry if I didn't understand your question correct. Ken On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:50 PM, ie ravindra ieravin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Friends, I have a following questions on international dial plans as in the lab. If we assumed we do have HQ | 1-576201*1001* - Extension 1001 in USA X City [1 National Access Code ] BR | 1-312301*2001* - Extension 2001 in USA Y City [1 National Access Code ] London | XX*YY*2131*9XXX* - Extension 9001 in UK - CME system. [XX - International | YY - National ] *Scenarios* 1. If HQ user dials BR1 extension through PSTN as 15762011001 what branch 2 router will receive. I observed its 15762011001. 2. what if HQ user dial 9011.442321319001 [Prefixed 9011 to 011] to London. What london router will receive. will it 442321319001 or 21319001 *Questions* As I observed router debugs I observed that US BR1 Router receives the calls to 13123012001 while UK router receives a call to 21319001. As I can observe US routers receives calls as national format so that I can manipulate through the router. For the london also I can manipulate incoming called number on the router. my question is\ there any standard method is used by International Careers on provide incoming called number to its subscribers. in other words is it come as local or national to the router. I believe my question is clear. Sorry about bad english again. Thanks, Ravi. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM ver 7 VMWare
Hi Guys, Is CUCM ver 7 officially supported on VMWare ? All we know Proctorlabs actual CCIE lab servers are virtualized use VMWare. But is it compatible as per cisco docs? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM ver 7 VMWare
Thanks all for responses, Concerning licensing raised by Ravindran , I've contradictory observations. CUC demo cannot have more than 2 VM ports , but I've seen 4 ports working in CUC in VMWare. Any thoughts? Ken On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ravindra Lakpriya lakpr...@gmail.comwrote: Its not supported. but still you can install it for testing purposes. but when you try to generate license you will be in trouble. On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Luis Carlos Sandi Porras luisca...@hotmail.com wrote: No its not. El 23/12/2012, a las 20:46, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com escribió: Hi Guys, Is CUCM ver 7 officially supported on VMWare ? All we know Proctorlabs actual CCIE lab servers are virtualized use VMWare. But is it compatible as per cisco docs? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Ravindra Lakpriya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Unity - DiRT
I'm upgrading Unity from 6.x to 8.x Unity Upgrade guide recommends to use DiRT for backup restore. But when we use DiRT , we have to restore onto same unity version ( then DiRT can't be used for my upgrade ? should I use COBRAS instead ? ) Am I missing something? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX 9 Application User Password recovery ?
Another shortcut is just create same enduser / password in CUCM. UCCX check crdentials against CUCM in real-time. As I remember it's an enduser not an application user. (I haven't tested this in version 9 yet) Ken On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:34 PM, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi Pavan, Have a look at this URL: http://htluo.blogspot.com/2011/09/cet-tool-for-uccx.html Regards. Khaled Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:07:35 -0500 From: pav.c...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX 9 Application User Password recovery ? I have a test UCCX 9 server that was configured and operational. The UCM cluster that was integrated with the UCCX was re-installed from scratch. Is there a way to recover the application user password / switch the server to the default post install state Basically trying to figure out a way to get into the appadmin gui. -- - Pavan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Prompt recording
If question ask to use Unity Connection , then use UC Media Master. From candidate PC open UC media master save your recording. Now from Candidate PC , open UCCX GUI upload your recorded prompts. For all other tasks of UCCX , open UCCX GUI from UCCX server ( first RDP to UCCX server ) -- for best browser compatibility. HTH On Jul 29, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I recorded a greeting on a call handler. Then went to download it to my computer, but the download menu item is grayed out. How can I download a greeting file(.wav) then upload it to UCCX Thanks, Cheers, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ switch question
If you don't use a switch module , a Router doesn't understand vlans. When you configure encapsulation dot1q 101 under Router sub-interface , it just add a vlan tag (101) before sending packets out of this interface incoming packets with same vlan tag is matched for this sub-interface (for layer 3 processing). Adding a native suffix just matches untagged packets. The native vlan need not be same for 2 interconnected devices , but if they don't match CDP may issue a warning everything else works fine. One interesting thing is , we can bridge 2 vlans by interconnecting two ports with different native vlans. Cisco don't directly allow vlan bridging but some other vendor switches do allow we need this sometimes while migration from other vendor switches. Ken On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Abel ... midga...@gmail.com wrote: Well, yes, it look like is working but in the background for HQ router native vlan is 101 so, untagged traffic is send over vlan 101, on the far switch the untagged traffic is been put on the native vlan (untagged) of the local switch, in this case 1. That is why everything can work even with this error, but not recommended following best practices. Regards On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.comwrote: This seems like a dumb question... If the hq rtr has a subinterface with native in it don't we have to have to have a native statement on the switch port with the trunk to hq? for example.. hq interface fa 0/0.101 encapsulation dot1q 101 native ip address 10.10.100.1 255.255.255.0 and the switch. interface fa 1/0/1 description Trunk to HQ RTR switchport mode trunk switchport encapsulation dot1q speed 100 duplex full Cheers, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] configuration of fxs port on sip Gateway
It's very simple voice-port x/x/x cptone xx cadence xx station-id x dial-peer voice xx pots destination-patt port x/x/x On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Alpesh Bhakta bhakta.alp...@gmail.comwrote: Can anybody tell me how to configure fxs port on 2811 router please. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FINALLY CLEARED :) :)
Hey All, It's very very interesting that cisco employees are also talking about Actual Exam Content publicly openly. Because following email is from vipji...@cisco.com (a cisco's email address). I guess cisco NDA is not applicable for cisco employees who get free vouchers for the test. I paid from my pocket for all 3 attempts to get my CCIE. Any comments ??? On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:48 AM, vipjinda vipji...@cisco.com wrote: Steven, I got lab 7 too in my first attempt and really struggling getting the answer for LAN qos question. Any idea for answer will help me creating the solution. -- Vipul Jindal On 6/23/12 2:18 PM, steven smith smith.steven1...@gmail.com wrote: HI GUYS, CLEARED i am so happy to announce i am CCIE V now its product to say Lab , -7 is really hard lab and people has to understand all proper variations of MGCP + H323 , * calling for CUE/Meet me I struggled for this lab took 1 month did this lab and got it :) People can openly email me for any questions no problem will help Thanks to everyone -- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice new Version
Hi, Many people are talking about a new blueprint for CCIE Voice Lab ( should be v4). Did cisco officially announce a syllabus change for CCIE Voice Lab? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert work book
WB Volume 1 serves this purpose. On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:40 PM, san r luv...@gmail.com wrote: Can anyone please guide me to select a workbook / material from IPExpert for CCIE voice.I'm looking for a self study material with explanation for technology not a lab oriented stuff. Thanks in advance. San ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Lan QOS
Hi, Didn't you forget cisco NDA discuss exam questions like this? (Cisco seems given a never-ending exercise to NDA violators) You can't conclude answers this way don't hope to pass first attempt or if cisco gives such questions. Just try again youll pass next time or a in a subsequent attempt if you prepared very well using IPExpert material. Thats only I can say. Thanks On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.ukwrote: But cucm and cup both run on the same VMWare server so will use the internal vswitch to communicate only traffic to the clients will traverse the switch port. On 15 May 2012 03:41, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: Whilst in some aspects you are right in that the CUPS server is really only involved in signalling - the question requires a guarantee of 32k for signal traffic between CUPC and CUPS (that's how I read it) as we are only instructed to put a policy of the CUPS server port, then we have to be careful not to put traffic between the CUPS and CUCM into the same policy as above as this would impact of the bandwidth allocated. At the end of the day it is a badly worded question. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Lan QOS
Hi Steve, If this was from another vendor lab , isn't it more approriate to discuss it in that domain? Frankly speaking , I had to attempt the lab several times to pass it. I adviced you from my experience don't want to recommend or critisize any vendor. Your Last Question Are you saying that this is similar to an actual exam question? I am unable to answer your question without braking NDA apologize for that. Good Luck next time ! On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: Ken, appreciate the wanring - but not sure what this has to do with Cisco NDA, we were discussing the Lab7 ccievoicelabs question as was evident in both the question title and my comments about it being a poorly worded question. Are you saying that this is similar to an actual exam question? Best regards, Steve On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Didn't you forget cisco NDA discuss exam questions like this? (Cisco seems given a never-ending exercise to NDA violators) You can't conclude answers this way don't hope to pass first attempt or if cisco gives such questions. Just try again youll pass next time or a in a subsequent attempt if you prepared very well using IPExpert material. Thats only I can say. Thanks On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.ukwrote: But cucm and cup both run on the same VMWare server so will use the internal vswitch to communicate only traffic to the clients will traverse the switch port. On 15 May 2012 03:41, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: Whilst in some aspects you are right in that the CUPS server is really only involved in signalling - the question requires a guarantee of 32k for signal traffic between CUPC and CUPS (that's how I read it) as we are only instructed to put a policy of the CUPS server port, then we have to be careful not to put traffic between the CUPS and CUCM into the same policy as above as this would impact of the bandwidth allocated. At the end of the day it is a badly worded question. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Lan QOS
If we specify a service-policy ,then mls qos trust commands won't have any effect. Then you have to consider rtp traffic in ACL. On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:32 PM, san r luv...@gmail.com wrote: Since they specifically asked for 'CUPC Signalling ' I don't think you need to mark the RTP traffic On May 13, 2012 11:53 AM, Nazeer rahiman nazs...@yahoo.com wrote: For LAN QoS I got below question All servers are connected (running on vmware) to SW int G 1/0/4. CUPC is running in UCCX and test pc. They asked to configure one in softphone mode other one is desktop mode. also configre voice mail on both clients QoS question was - In Gig 1/0/4 , make sure all incoming CUPC signaling traffic to mark CS3 and gurantee 32k BW. anythung exess should be mark down to DSCP 8 and retransmit. My ans was - mls qos mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 mls qos map policed-dscp 24 26 to 8 ip access-list extended voice-rtp permit udp any any range 16384 32767 ip access-list extended cupc-sig permit tcp any any eq 5060 permit tcp any any eq 5060 permit tcp any eq 5060 any permit udp any any eq 5060 permit udp any eq 5060 any permit tcp any any eq 143 permit tcp any eq 143 any permit tcp any any eq 80 permit tcp any eq 80 any permit tcp any any eq 443 permit tcp any eq 443 any permit tcp any any eq 993 permit tcp any eq 993 any permit tcp any any eq 7993 permit tcp any eq 7993 any permit tcp any any eq 389 permit tcp any eq 389 any permit tcp any any eq 2748 permit tcp any eq 2748 any config)#class-map voice-rtp (config-cmap)#match access-group name voice-rtp (config)#class-map match any cupc-sig (config-cmap)#match access-group name cupc-sig (config-cmap)#policy-map cupc (config-pmap)#class voice-rtp (config-pmap-c)#set dscp ef (config-pmap)#class cupc-sig (config-pmap-c)#police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit (config-pmap-c)#set dscp cs3 (config)#interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4 config-if)#service-policy input cupc Phone ports mls qos trust cos mls qos trust device cisco phone Server ports mls qos trust dscp I got 0 marks for this question - any body can clarify where it's wrong ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Telnet Monitoring
Enable AAA accounting. On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Ravindra Lakpriya lakpr...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Guys, Apologies. this is nothing related CCIE. I want to monitor the changes done by another telnet session. when i enable ter mon i can see the user log in. But in my case i want to see what commands its sending to the IOS. Is there anyway to get that output in realtime ? Best Regards -- Ravindra Lakpriya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS QoS
We have to trust DSCP because non-trunk ports doesn't carry CoS information. CoS is part of the dot1q tag added to the packet when it traverse through a trunk port ( or voice vlan of an access port). Servers don't tag packets hence CoS is N/A for CUCM / CUC / CUPS / CUPC / CIPC , etc... Can I know your reference saying default for CUPS proxy is cs3 On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:05 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: if a question was to ask to apply QoS for the port connected to the CUPS would you trust DSCP or COS on the port? Taking into account that the default for CUPS proxy is cs3 and assuming you've applied a policy that contains an access list to cover all the port used by CUPS. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PASS !!!!!!!!!!! # 35359
Hi, Congrats for passing CCIE Voice , which is the most troublesome compared to other CCIE Tracks. I believe IPExpert recently partnered with VOICE SOLUTIONS (India) to conduct Bootcamps in India that's why another Institute name came to this IPX OSL. Does Vik also teach there? Thanks, Ken On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Puneet Jain puneetjain2...@yahoo.comwrote: Hello Everyone, After working for 1 year dedicately on CCIE, I have achieve my target. Its really proud to be a CCIE after struggling 1 year when i came out from the lab and saw my result it was all tears in my eyes. I cannot stop it neither want to stop that but it was a beautiful moments/part of my life which wont come ever When i read the statement below my result it makes me more proud LESS THEN 3% of CCNA/CCNP becomes CCIE or achieve CCIE certification. Thanks to all of them who was with me in my bad times. Special thanks to VOICE SOLUTIONS (India), who has encourged me after failing my 2nd attempt otherwise it was not possible. Hats-off to the guys they are master in VOICE i have never seen the institute supporting and testing till morning 4 AM with thier clients :) This really amazed me. My last statement is just DONE LOSE THE HOPES, It will make you nerves, It will make you feel bad, but when you will achieve the same you will be on the TOP While practising there was lof of things which i have missed in my life family functions / friends i am feeling like i am in new world today :) Now its not the end most difficult part comes after being CCIE which we have to keep our status same way people expectation increase from you. Special thanks to people who has kept a confident on me. If anyone want to be in touch feel free to contact me at puneetj...@hcl.com Regards Puneet Jain *+91-9711133314* *HCL (NOIDA)* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Router QoS Policy Map
Baqari As per IPExpert DSG , it can't be so. if LLQ takes place compression , we have to allocate uncompressed bandwidth irrespective of whether compression is used or not. But we allocate different kbps rates for compreesed uncompressed flows. Thanks On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.comwrote: LLQ will always take place before header compression. This is the meaning. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2012, at 11:43 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Just one more thing I think we don't need a specific order of priority compress statements under same class. ( always this bw refers to post-compressed bw). Can anybody confirm this? On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Just copied from my router. policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust bandwidth 32 class class-default fair-queue You can see there are 2 statements under class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp. Starting place of compress keyword is right-shifted from that of priority command. What does this mean? I reordered two statements class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust compress header ip rtp priority 90 still compress starts right shifted. Any idea why? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Router QoS Policy Map
Resending (corrected typo) Baqari As per IPExpert DSG , it can't be so. if LLQ takes place before compression , we have to allocate uncompressed bandwidth irrespective of whether compression is used or not. But we allocate different kbps rates for compreesed uncompressed flows. Thanks On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.comwrote: LLQ will always take place before header compression. This is the meaning. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2012, at 11:43 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Just one more thing I think we don't need a specific order of priority compress statements under same class. ( always this bw refers to post-compressed bw). Can anybody confirm this? On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Just copied from my router. policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust bandwidth 32 class class-default fair-queue You can see there are 2 statements under class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp. Starting place of compress keyword is right-shifted from that of priority command. What does this mean? I reordered two statements class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust compress header ip rtp priority 90 still compress starts right shifted. Any idea why? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP and CFB
I think this is true ony if device location is Hub-None , otherwise device location override DP On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Mohammed Al Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Juan, ** ** FYI, device pool location will override device location. This is the only thing going in reverse direction. ** ** Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Juan Lopez *Sent:* Friday, April 27, 2012 11:57 AM *To:* Ken Wyan *Cc:* CCIE Study *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP and CFB ** ** hi Ken, sorry - indeed, quite confusing. Must be momentary lapse of reason down here... Trying to figure out/re-engineering what I was trying to do... please disregard for now ;) - I'm going for a break :) ps: correct to say the leaving the location setting on the device level = hub_none, will make the UCM to go look at the next level, ie: the location setting on the device pool. This is what I see for phones, gateways, vm ports, cti ports ... cheers, Juan Op 27 april 2012 07:57 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende:** ** Your question isn't clear. For RSVP , we need 2 mtp s (rsvp enabled) at each. They should be in MRGL of each end device respectively. Are you going to use CFB as rsvp agent as well? On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: all, just found out and wonder if someone can confirm: unless you place a CFB in a location (instead of being placed in a location by means of the CFB's device pool location setting) - RSVP will not be triggered ?? So if I leave the location at the CFB set to hub_none (where it then should check the device pool's location setting - correct me if I'm wrong), and with the location on the device pool set to HQ, no RSVP will be triggered. When setting the location on CFB pages to 'HQ' , RSVP will be triggered.** ** Do you also see this in your labs? thanks for the feedback, Juan ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ** ** ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Router QoS Policy Map
Just copied from my router. policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust bandwidth 32 class class-default fair-queue You can see there are 2 statements under class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp. Starting place of compress keyword is right-shifted from that of priority command. What does this mean? I reordered two statements class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust compress header ip rtp priority 90 still compress starts right shifted. Any idea why? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Router QoS Policy Map
Just one more thing I think we don't need a specific order of priority compress statements under same class. ( always this bw refers to post-compressed bw). Can anybody confirm this? On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Just copied from my router. policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust bandwidth 32 class class-default fair-queue You can see there are 2 statements under class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust priority 90 compress header ip rtp. Starting place of compress keyword is right-shifted from that of priority command. What does this mean? I reordered two statements class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust compress header ip rtp priority 90 still compress starts right shifted. Any idea why? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] load (telephony-service)
As per Vik , we don't need it. It may waste lab time if it start loading firmware. Thanks On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:51 AM, AJ ciscoie2...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Experts, In CCIE lab, Is load command under telephony-service necessary to get complete points for CME phone registration? Also does the following apply to current version of CME in the lab? “In Cisco Unified CME 7.0(1) and later versions: • When specifying the *load* command for phone firmware versions later than version 8-2-2 for all phone types and you use the file suffix in the filename, the tftp-server bindings are automatically added for all the files forwarded for that load. For example: Router(config-telephony)# *load 7941 SCCP41.8-3-3S.loads* Router(config-telephony)# • The *load* command is enhanced to automatically create TFTP bindings for phone firmware files if the *cnf-file location* command is configured with the *flash* or *slot0* keyword. You are no longer required to configure the *tftp-server* command to create TFTP bindings only if the location of the cnf files is* *router flash or slot 0 memory.” Thanks, AJ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Synchronization Route Point
After configuring UCCX server ( applications with trigger , scripts , .) finally if I run Unified CM Data Synchronization check ; UCCX shows that Route Points (created by UCCX itself corresponding to telephony triggers in CUCM) have a data inconsistency between CUCM UCCX. Even we don't check it , there's no problem. But why does it show like this ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP and CFB
Your question isn't clear. For RSVP , we need 2 mtp s (rsvp enabled) at each. They should be in MRGL of each end device respectively. Are you going to use CFB as rsvp agent as well? On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: all, just found out and wonder if someone can confirm: unless you place a CFB in a location (instead of being placed in a location by means of the CFB's device pool location setting) - RSVP will not be triggered ?? So if I leave the location at the CFB set to hub_none (where it then should check the device pool's location setting - correct me if I'm wrong), and with the location on the device pool set to HQ, no RSVP will be triggered. When setting the location on CFB pages to 'HQ' , RSVP will be triggered. Do you also see this in your labs? thanks for the feedback, Juan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step
Hi, If I save script in /default then upload same using GUI , is it ok? (I can see then two scripts SCRIPT SSCRIPT with same name ; but I shouldn't use SSCRIPT for any application) Thanks On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ronmac ron...@solcon.nl wrote: Hi, If you save it direct to disk .../default The file is removed after a reload of the server, or node service restart Ccx checks repository and removes wat is not in there Regards Ron Send from my mobile Op 26 apr. 2012 om 17:47 heeft Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk het volgende geschreven: Hi Ken, I think we are talking at cross purposes slightly. wfavvid/system/scripts/defaults is indeed the disk location of the system scripts repository and wfavvid/user/scripts/defaults [or similar] is the disk location created when you first upload to the user repository. I am definately not advocating directly copying anything to the filesystem locations. There are two ways to upload a script into the repository, 1) by saving to disk and then uploading from the webpage 2) by using the repository link in the left hand pane when saving from the editor. Option 2 is functionally equivilent to 1 but quicker. And I can confirm that reactive debugging works in this scenario (although you do need to refresh the application that uses the script I think). But never modify the system scripts, take a copy and save back as a user script... . On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Kevin I believe we should never save scripts (from CCXEditor) to wfavvid/system/scripts/defaults folder (which you call script repository where default scripts are located) We can copy a default script , modify save in a different location using ScriptEditor. Now use UCCX GUI to upload it. If you manually upload to script repository , reactive debugging option is not available some TAC Engineers also told me not to do it. Somehow , your method may be the only expected answer for CCIE Lab. Because I didn't get marks for UCCX section eventhough everything worked well. Ken On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.ukwrote: Well, make sure you know by heart how to write a short script to record a prompt. And know your way around the default scripts as they may ask you to modify one of them. The other thing I've noticed is that you can't initially upload scripts direct to the repository, but once you've _attempted_ to upload any file to 'scripts' the folder structure is created, and you have full access from the editor. I tend to attempt to upload any old file from my desktop, it fails but creates the folders and gives me direct repository access from Editor after that. On 25 Apr 2012 14:40, Alex K negodiay...@hotmail.com wrote: Guys, Anybody can recommend UCCX script scenarious to practice for the Lab? Thanks Alex -- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:36:28 +0530 From: kew...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step Sometimes , our scripts send calls to an agent at the middle of the script. In that case should we include an End step right below call-contact step ? Is it recommended / not recommended to have multiple End steps in a single script? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Agent Automatic Available
Thanks , I tested UCCX works as you explained. May be I misunderstood or read a wrong source before. Ken On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ken, I would like to clarify the behavior for you here. 1) Automatic Available setting is only available on the Resource (Agent) Level. Not on the CSQ or in the System Params. 2) CSQ contains the setting for the Automatic Work and the Timer you can set for the Work State for the Agents. 3) The setting in the System Params, Agent State after Ring No Answer* applies only when there is Ring No Answer, i.e., when the agent does not answer the call and it determines the state of the Agent if they do not answer a call. So, the features of *Automatic Available* on the Agent level and *Automatic Work* at the CSQ Level go hand in hand. Let me explain: Example: - Let's say we have a CSQ name Q and agent A is a part of this Q. - A call comes to this queue (Q) and agent A answers the call. - Now the feature of Automatic Work at the CSQ level and the timer set with it (IF ENABLED), will set the Agent state to Work for the amount of Time defined at the CSQ level. - After the timer expires, the next state for the Agent will be determined on the basis of the Automatic Available setting for the agent. If Automatic Available is set to Enabled at the Resource Level, then after the Work Timer expires, Agent will go to Ready State. If Automatic Available is set to Disabled, then after the work timer, the agent will go into Not Ready state NOTE: THE SETTING OF AUTOMATIC WORK AND AUTOMATIC AVAILABLE KICK IN ONCE THE AGENT HANDLES (Answers) A CALL. The setting in the System Params kicks in if the Agent DOES NOT answer a call. I've also attached a couple of screenshots for you here. HTH Regards Gurpreet On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We can set Automatic availabe for individual agents or CSQ level. If we disable Automatic available from CSQ then the settings of individual agents will be applied. There's a service parameter also to enable / disable automatic available. Can anyone tell , how does this parameter affects agent availability. (I think service parameter should have least priority than agent/CSQ ; but I want to confirm from somebody major in IPCC) Thanks. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step
Hi Gurpeet, Thanks for your recommendation. Take an example , we use a menu step to redirect a call based on a user input. this shows many output flows such as timeout , busy , invalid , unsuccessful. As per your logic , does script hangs in that place if such an (undesired) event occur. I thought script moves forward through next listed steps. Do we need only a goto end step , only under successful call-contact ? Ken On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ken, I would go with Peter here. A terminate step is needed to make sure that the session is not stuck and the port is released. We use it as a best practice. You can use a Go To Step with the Connected/Connect step and send it to the Terminate Label you'll create before the End step. Regards Gurpreet On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: But UCCX default scripts don't have terminate step ? reason? On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.huwrote: You can insert a Goto step to direct the contact to the final and single End step. I would also put a Terminate step just before the End to free up the IVR port. Peter - Original Message - From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:26 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sometimes , our scripts send calls to an agent at the middle of the script. In that case should we include an End step right below call-contact step ? Is it recommended / not recommended to have multiple End steps in a single script? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step
Kevin I believe we should never save scripts (from CCXEditor) to wfavvid/system/scripts/defaults folder (which you call script repository where default scripts are located) We can copy a default script , modify save in a different location using ScriptEditor. Now use UCCX GUI to upload it. If you manually upload to script repository , reactive debugging option is not available some TAC Engineers also told me not to do it. Somehow , your method may be the only expected answer for CCIE Lab. Because I didn't get marks for UCCX section eventhough everything worked well. Ken On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.ukwrote: Well, make sure you know by heart how to write a short script to record a prompt. And know your way around the default scripts as they may ask you to modify one of them. The other thing I've noticed is that you can't initially upload scripts direct to the repository, but once you've _attempted_ to upload any file to 'scripts' the folder structure is created, and you have full access from the editor. I tend to attempt to upload any old file from my desktop, it fails but creates the folders and gives me direct repository access from Editor after that. On 25 Apr 2012 14:40, Alex K negodiay...@hotmail.com wrote: Guys, Anybody can recommend UCCX script scenarious to practice for the Lab? Thanks Alex -- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:36:28 +0530 From: kew...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step Sometimes , our scripts send calls to an agent at the middle of the script. In that case should we include an End step right below call-contact step ? Is it recommended / not recommended to have multiple End steps in a single script? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step
Thanks for replying it's very clear. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Ken, Gurpreet/Peter are correct - you misunderstand as far as the script behavour goes: the script goes to the next step if nothing is specified under the 'menu' step's 'substep' (eg: no step defined under the 'timeout', 'unsuccessful'...will take it to the next step defined after the menu step) Therefore it is best to have a 'Goto' defined below the 'connect' step so the script can 'terminate' using the 'terminate' step... hope this somewhat clear - not easy to explain ... ;) cheers, Juan Op 26 april 2012 08:58 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: Hi Gurpeet, Thanks for your recommendation. Take an example , we use a menu step to redirect a call based on a user input. this shows many output flows such as timeout , busy , invalid , unsuccessful. As per your logic , does script hangs in that place if such an (undesired) event occur. I thought script moves forward through next listed steps. Do we need only a goto end step , only under successful call-contact ? Ken On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ken, I would go with Peter here. A terminate step is needed to make sure that the session is not stuck and the port is released. We use it as a best practice. You can use a Go To Step with the Connected/Connect step and send it to the Terminate Label you'll create before the End step. Regards Gurpreet On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: But UCCX default scripts don't have terminate step ? reason? On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.huwrote: You can insert a Goto step to direct the contact to the final and single End step. I would also put a Terminate step just before the End to free up the IVR port. Peter - Original Message - From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:26 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sometimes , our scripts send calls to an agent at the middle of the script. In that case should we include an End step right below call-contact step ? Is it recommended / not recommended to have multiple End steps in a single script? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step
Hi, Somehow , it seems not mandatory to use a terminate step eventhough it's a good practice. https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2042704 (My objective is not to show I am correct or anything ; but say in CCIE lab Exam , we can do a task using a default script , if I am to include a terminate script I have to open script editor , edit script , uploading , takes few minutes of very valuble time) Thanks On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for replying it's very clear. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ken, Gurpreet/Peter are correct - you misunderstand as far as the script behavour goes: the script goes to the next step if nothing is specified under the 'menu' step's 'substep' (eg: no step defined under the 'timeout', 'unsuccessful'...will take it to the next step defined after the menu step) Therefore it is best to have a 'Goto' defined below the 'connect' step so the script can 'terminate' using the 'terminate' step... hope this somewhat clear - not easy to explain ... ;) cheers, Juan Op 26 april 2012 08:58 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: Hi Gurpeet, Thanks for your recommendation. Take an example , we use a menu step to redirect a call based on a user input. this shows many output flows such as timeout , busy , invalid , unsuccessful. As per your logic , does script hangs in that place if such an (undesired) event occur. I thought script moves forward through next listed steps. Do we need only a goto end step , only under successful call-contact ? Ken On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ken, I would go with Peter here. A terminate step is needed to make sure that the session is not stuck and the port is released. We use it as a best practice. You can use a Go To Step with the Connected/Connect step and send it to the Terminate Label you'll create before the End step. Regards Gurpreet On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: But UCCX default scripts don't have terminate step ? reason? On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.huwrote: You can insert a Goto step to direct the contact to the final and single End step. I would also put a Terminate step just before the End to free up the IVR port. Peter - Original Message - From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:26 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sometimes , our scripts send calls to an agent at the middle of the script. In that case should we include an End step right below call-contact step ? Is it recommended / not recommended to have multiple End steps in a single script? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Agent Automatic Available
Hi, We can set Automatic availabe for individual agents or CSQ level. If we disable Automatic available from CSQ then the settings of individual agents will be applied. There's a service parameter also to enable / disable automatic available. Can anyone tell , how does this parameter affects agent availability. (I think service parameter should have least priority than agent/CSQ ; but I want to confirm from somebody major in IPCC) Thanks. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step
Sometimes , our scripts send calls to an agent at the middle of the script. In that case should we include an End step right below call-contact step ? Is it recommended / not recommended to have multiple End steps in a single script? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS NTP
don't use ntp master if this router needs to get time updates from another NTP server. In fact HQ Router don't need ntp master ntp source is needed for HQ to sync with a priority ntp server. It doesn't affect time-syncing of SB SC. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Maik Stokman maikstok...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi, For configuring IOS ntp I have 3 questions: 1. Do I need the ntp master command? Which stratum is best practice? 2. Do I need the ntp update-calendar command? 3. Do I need the configure “ntp source loopback 0” when site b and c must use the HQ loopback interface as NTP server At this moment I use the following configuration: HQ conf t ntp x.x.x.x ntp master ntp calendar-update ntp source loopback 0 clock timezone PST -8 clock summer-time PST recurring SB ntp x.x.x.x clock time-zone CST -6 clock summer-time CST recurring SC ntp x.x.x.x clock time-zone HKT 8 clock summer-time HKT recurring Regards, Maik ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS NTP
No you don't need. if you put ntp master , HQ Router won't synchronize with Backbone ntp server. I should have told more , but can't because of Cisco NDA. Thanks On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Maik Stokman maikstok...@hotmail.comwrote: Ken, What about Cisco Callmanager. Don’t we need ntp master for that? I see in the ipexpert study books that the command is used. I lost some point on the lab for the basic configuration (vlan/dhcp/ntp) I think is was for the ntp. But looks like I did nothing wrong there. That’s the reason I look for commands that cisco expects. I know that without the master command everything works fine. But is that good enough. *From:* Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:10 AM *To:* Maik Stokman maikstok...@hotmail.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS NTP don't use ntp master if this router needs to get time updates from another NTP server. In fact HQ Router don't need ntp master ntp source is needed for HQ to sync with a priority ntp server. It doesn't affect time-syncing of SB SC. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Maik Stokman maikstok...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi, For configuring IOS ntp I have 3 questions: 1. Do I need the ntp master command? Which stratum is best practice? 2. Do I need the ntp update-calendar command? 3. Do I need the configure “ntp source loopback 0” when site b and c must use the HQ loopback interface as NTP server At this moment I use the following configuration: HQ conf t ntp x.x.x.x ntp master ntp calendar-update ntp source loopback 0 clock timezone PST -8 clock summer-time PST recurring SB ntp x.x.x.x clock time-zone CST -6 clock summer-time CST recurring SC ntp x.x.x.x clock time-zone HKT 8 clock summer-time HKT recurring Regards, Maik ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step
But UCCX default scripts don't have terminate step ? reason? On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu wrote: You can insert a Goto step to direct the contact to the final and single End step. I would also put a Terminate step just before the End to free up the IVR port. Peter - Original Message - From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:26 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Scripts End Step To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sometimes , our scripts send calls to an agent at the middle of the script. In that case should we include an End step right below call-contact step ? Is it recommended / not recommended to have multiple End steps in a single script? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FAILED, lllllllllaaabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb77777777777777
Hey, BUG ??? Use a good bugkiller , then you can sleep well I hope without shouting spamming. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, lab7done lab7done lab7d...@gmail.comwrote: Guys Lab has a bug just attempted and things did nt worked it was saying no associated mailbox Configure iDivert on Phones. SCPH1 should be able to transfer active calls on his phone to voicemail by dialing *4001. SCPH1 should have sixth saying Transfer to Voicemail Xfer-to-VM.. *4001 should be mapped on this button If anyone practising 7 or 6 please let me know i am interested :) Thks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs session
I have a session tomorrow (26th) at 8.00 am , but like to shift it to 27th same time. But racks are full due to Bootcamp these 3 days. If anybody has scheduled for 27th 8.00 am like to shift it to tomorrow (26th) 8.00 please unicast me. Thanks. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Your question
Ok , Ill answer your question in a better way than your method. Make a translation pattern of *4001 with mask a new css (say lab7done ) make a partition lab7done include it in CSS lab7done create a RP 4001 (in partition lab7done) forward all to voicemail. No need for e164 numbers in CUE. --- I answered your question only that's it -- On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:38 PM, lab7done lab7done lab7d...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Guys and friends i have done full CUE config but there is bug which mean u have to send the call from translation pattern to e164 number on cue to make this up. Kyan, I am sure in yr home there are lot of stupid mosti heehhe Abel, I am sure u do not desrve thats why u did nt able to answer my questions. Hassan, thanks for working with me, Basically this questions are from lab its important thanks On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Abel ... midga...@gmail.com wrote: If someone doesn't know how to do that, don't deserve the number, or be called expert. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, BUG ??? Use a good bugkiller , then you can sleep well I hope without shouting spamming. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, lab7done lab7done lab7d...@gmail.com wrote: Guys Lab has a bug just attempted and things did nt worked it was saying no associated mailbox Configure iDivert on Phones. SCPH1 should be able to transfer active calls on his phone to voicemail by dialing *4001. SCPH1 should have sixth saying Transfer to Voicemail Xfer-to-VM.. *4001 should be mapped on this button If anyone practising 7 or 6 please let me know i am interested :) Thks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FAILED, lllllllllaaabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb77777777777777
Hi, We didn't get any email from Hassan means he had privately emailed him. Real lab vendors disclose their client names publicly as done here. Be careful if you go with them On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:38 PM, lab7done lab7done lab7d...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Guys and friends i have done full CUE config but there is bug which mean u have to send the call from translation pattern to e164 number on cue to make this up. Kyan, I am sure in yr home there are lot of stupid mosti heehhe Abel, I am sure u do not desrve thats why u did nt able to answer my questions. Hassan, thanks for working with me, Basically this questions are from lab its important thanks On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Abel ... midga...@gmail.com wrote: If someone doesn't know how to do that, don't deserve the number, or be called expert. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, BUG ??? Use a good bugkiller , then you can sleep well I hope without shouting spamming. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, lab7done lab7done lab7d...@gmail.com wrote: Guys Lab has a bug just attempted and things did nt worked it was saying no associated mailbox Configure iDivert on Phones. SCPH1 should be able to transfer active calls on his phone to voicemail by dialing *4001. SCPH1 should have sixth saying Transfer to Voicemail Xfer-to-VM.. *4001 should be mapped on this button If anyone practising 7 or 6 please let me know i am interested :) Thks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Services
Unity Connection Serviceability has following services. Cisco AXL Web Service Cisco Serviceability Reporter Cisco Dirsync Even if all above services are deactivated , Unity connection seems works fine (integrated with CUCM / Presence) What above services are for? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Device Pool of UCCX generated cti devices
When we integrate UCCX with CUCM , cti ports cti route points are configured through UCCX GUI it's automatically propogated to CUCM. My question is , when we create a new telephony trigger / media group , device pool cage is always filled by UCCX. Which DP is selected by UCCX for this? (if multiple device pools are configured already in CUCM) KW ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Services
Hi, We can import users without AXL service (that's why I asked this here) from CUCM to Unity. Thanks for clarifications. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: Ken, AXL for import users from UCM, serv. reporter to run reports from serv. pages, dirsync to import users directly from AD (I believe) cheers! Op 24 april 2012 09:38 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: Unity Connection Serviceability has following services. Cisco AXL Web Service Cisco Serviceability Reporter Cisco Dirsync Even if all above services are deactivated , Unity connection seems works fine (integrated with CUCM / Presence) What above services are for? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE and SIP-Notify
I never specify a dtmf-relay mechanism under sip subsystem. That's enough for SCCP phones in Site C (whether it's standalone CUCME or CME working in srst mode with CUCM-CUE primary integration) For SIP phones , we have to ; but it's out of scope of CCIE Exam. Thanks On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:21 AM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: Just working on some CUE stuff today and stumbled across the option to configure dtmf-relay rtp-nte under the sip subsystem of the CUE. In general , I've always followed the consensus that you shoud use RTP-NTE everywhere BUT when communicating with CUE which uses SIP-NOTIFY. I wanted to reach out the group to see if anyone has input on any of the implications of changing the SIP subsystem to use RTP-NTE instead of SIP-NOTIFY ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA issue playing the prompts
Remove direct-inward-dial from dial-peer 100 In service parameters MVA destination should be complete match (default) Thanks On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: Dear all, redoing some lab testing today, and for some odd reason :) I am not able to have MVA playing the prompts. I call in into the MVA number. I hear the lady in the box telling me I'm welcome to Cisco Unified Comms. Then it goes silent apart from that it is working: while no one asks me - enter the user's PIN code 12345, press 1, then an internal number in the none partition, it will connect to that number. Cheking the debug vxml on the router does not tell much. Then checking the trace files either: the trace steps regarding playing the first prompt - which I believe is the one asking for the PIN: controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]::getLocaleFile() controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]::getLocaleFile() fileName = 5.au and locale = en_US controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]::getLocaleFile() fileName = 5.au and locale = en_US controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]:: getting the file now so no errors, but nothing played. Can anyone help me with this, I cannot seem to find what is wrong. To make sure, I placed the router in the HQ device pool - so it speaks g711 with the UCM -as I am not sure the UCM will be able to play these prompts in g729 too. On the router it's: dial-peer voice 100 pots service mva incoming called-number 2220 direct-inward-dial ! dial-peer voice 1001 voip destination-pattern 2220 voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:177.1.10.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad with the voice-class codec speaking g711u/g729r8 PS/ reboot of servers did not help. any help is much appreciated ! Juan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA issue playing the prompts
did you reboot CUCM ? service parameter to be 10 digits complete match. On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: thanks - did remove the direct inward dial, checked the complete match. Still no prompt to be heard passed the initial welcome to cisco unified comms ' cheers, Juan Op 21 april 2012 12:00 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: Remove direct-inward-dial from dial-peer 100 In service parameters MVA destination should be complete match (default) Thanks On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, redoing some lab testing today, and for some odd reason :) I am not able to have MVA playing the prompts. I call in into the MVA number. I hear the lady in the box telling me I'm welcome to Cisco Unified Comms. Then it goes silent apart from that it is working: while no one asks me - enter the user's PIN code 12345, press 1, then an internal number in the none partition, it will connect to that number. Cheking the debug vxml on the router does not tell much. Then checking the trace files either: the trace steps regarding playing the first prompt - which I believe is the one asking for the PIN: controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]::getLocaleFile() controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]::getLocaleFile() fileName = 5.au and locale = en_US controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]::getLocaleFile() fileName = 5.au and locale = en_US controller.IVRGetAudioFile - [CCM_IVR]:: getting the file now so no errors, but nothing played. Can anyone help me with this, I cannot seem to find what is wrong. To make sure, I placed the router in the HQ device pool - so it speaks g711 with the UCM -as I am not sure the UCM will be able to play these prompts in g729 too. On the router it's: dial-peer voice 100 pots service mva incoming called-number 2220 direct-inward-dial ! dial-peer voice 1001 voip destination-pattern 2220 voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:177.1.10.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad with the voice-class codec speaking g711u/g729r8 PS/ reboot of servers did not help. any help is much appreciated ! Juan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voiceview display
sorry , New Urgent On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, A simple question Voiceview shows 1. Inbox (0 NU / 0N / 0S ) N -- New Messages S-- Saved Messages NU -- ? what does NU stand for ? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission
I am wondering how a Dubai proctor can call US proctor because they are in 2 timezones. When Dubai proctor is working , US proctors are sleeping vice-versa. I don't think CCIE Lab proctors work after office-hours. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Vinay Fernandes vinay.1...@live.comwrote: Yes..even I saw in Dubai..the Proctor was testing previous candidates lab... He was making calls on that lab which was next to me and making notes.and then he made calls in US to update the other proctor .. I think 2 Proctors are grading -- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:35:49 +0530 From: kew...@gmail.com To: miller.mat...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission I agree. But if cisco gives non-voice proctor which test calls to do the expected result , he can grade voice candidates (without knowing anything in Voice) (Grading is based on whether your solution works don't look for a particular configuration method). Remaining parts will be done by grading script (search for exact keywords in router configuration , etc...) No re-reads possible no one can challenge the result. I have a doubt is this hapenning now. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.comwrote: Testing for SJ is performed remotely from what I understand. Plus all proctors are not necessarily CCIE in voice. They may be in R/S or something else. From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:52:24 +0530 To: Maria Bagamanova bagaman...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission I think local proctor in each lab location , grades the Voice Lab. Because a remote person can't make test calls to verify. Strange part is ; I saw lab proctor making test calls (for previous candidates grading) BUT when I asked about a question requirement , he was not clear whether it's required or not. I'm wondering if 2 proctor's are involved in grading a CCIE Voice labs at remote locations. (one person to test calls other one to check configurations) Thanks On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Maria Bagamanova bagaman...@gmail.comwrote: You will have icons to telnet for each device on the desktop. Speed is ok. I took my labs in RTP. The proctor (David) is very helpful. The most important part, he will grade your lab. So, you can ask him will you give me points if I did so and so for this tasks... and he will answer. The time zone is important. My rack rentals start at 6am EST, lab in RTP starts at 7:05am EST, so at 7am EST I definitely ready for lab and I am not sleeping. Also, you don't have to spent money for travel at RTP. Hotel's shuttle will pick you up from the airport and drop you off at Test Center. They know Cisco address, building #3. After the lab hotel's shuttle can drive you to the airport from Cisco building. CCIE Voice #34861 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: maybe a stupid Q - but as I've not been in the lab yet: do we have telnet sessions available - or all console (low speed, specially for debug)? If so, is it on the same the local PC where we can use notepad? I guess the UCCX won't have a putty client on it - so using notepad over there is not ideal... cheers, Juan Op 19 april 2012 08:53 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: I didn't have problem accessing notepad in local PC. But never try to use notepad via VNC to candidate PC it's slow.. I think , we can use Remote Desktop to connect to UCCX use notepad there , rather than struggling with Test PC (through VNC small display) On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.comwrote: You can use notepad on the test PC but it is not enabled on the PC you are sitting at. So basically you have to use notepad through VNC which sucks. 2012/4/18 Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu Notepad is not enabled by default at each location? Peter - Original Message - From: Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:04 pm Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission To: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com, Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I think it depends on how early you like to get up and how close you are to each. RTP Test starts at 7:10. You get a 20 minutes lunch in a conference room and it is catered in and are done by 3:45. SJ Test starts at 8:30. You get a 40-45 minute lunch in a cafeteria with lots of choices. You are done with the test about 5:05. Computers are about the same, but you get access to notepad on your computer in RTP but not in SJ. I felt like the proctor at RTP is more helpful. From: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:44:36 -0400
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission
Good idea. Next time Ill ask proctor to help me to make test calls during Lab as we need 2 people to properly test. Just kidding... These proctors make unnecessary sounds next to voice seat disturbing our test. They put 1 phone in speakerphone mode call from another phone to verify. They never think that they disturb voice candidate. They are too lazy to lift handset hear himself only. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Ahmed Benhida ahmed_benh...@yahoo.comwrote: you really need two people A B sides to test, could be one way audio or no audio at all, or does the tester look at RTP packets ... or may be this is all not a part of the test.. -- *From:* Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com *To:* Vinay Fernandes vinay.1...@live.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Friday, April 20, 2012 3:24 AM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission I am wondering how a Dubai proctor can call US proctor because they are in 2 timezones. When Dubai proctor is working , US proctors are sleeping vice-versa. I don't think CCIE Lab proctors work after office-hours. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Vinay Fernandes vinay.1...@live.comwrote: Yes..even I saw in Dubai..the Proctor was testing previous candidates lab... He was making calls on that lab which was next to me and making notes.and then he made calls in US to update the other proctor .. I think 2 Proctors are grading -- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:35:49 +0530 From: kew...@gmail.com To: miller.mat...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission I agree. But if cisco gives non-voice proctor which test calls to do the expected result , he can grade voice candidates (without knowing anything in Voice) (Grading is based on whether your solution works don't look for a particular configuration method). Remaining parts will be done by grading script (search for exact keywords in router configuration , etc...) No re-reads possible no one can challenge the result. I have a doubt is this hapenning now. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.comwrote: Testing for SJ is performed remotely from what I understand. Plus all proctors are not necessarily CCIE in voice. They may be in R/S or something else. From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:52:24 +0530 To: Maria Bagamanova bagaman...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission I think local proctor in each lab location , grades the Voice Lab. Because a remote person can't make test calls to verify. Strange part is ; I saw lab proctor making test calls (for previous candidates grading) BUT when I asked about a question requirement , he was not clear whether it's required or not. I'm wondering if 2 proctor's are involved in grading a CCIE Voice labs at remote locations. (one person to test calls other one to check configurations) Thanks On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Maria Bagamanova bagaman...@gmail.comwrote: You will have icons to telnet for each device on the desktop. Speed is ok. I took my labs in RTP. The proctor (David) is very helpful. The most important part, he will grade your lab. So, you can ask him will you give me points if I did so and so for this tasks... and he will answer. The time zone is important. My rack rentals start at 6am EST, lab in RTP starts at 7:05am EST, so at 7am EST I definitely ready for lab and I am not sleeping. Also, you don't have to spent money for travel at RTP. Hotel's shuttle will pick you up from the airport and drop you off at Test Center. They know Cisco address, building #3. After the lab hotel's shuttle can drive you to the airport from Cisco building. CCIE Voice #34861 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: maybe a stupid Q - but as I've not been in the lab yet: do we have telnet sessions available - or all console (low speed, specially for debug)? If so, is it on the same the local PC where we can use notepad? I guess the UCCX won't have a putty client on it - so using notepad over there is not ideal... cheers, Juan Op 19 april 2012 08:53 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: I didn't have problem accessing notepad in local PC. But never try to use notepad via VNC to candidate PC it's slow.. I think , we can use Remote Desktop to connect to UCCX use notepad there , rather than struggling with Test PC (through VNC small display) On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.comwrote: You can use notepad on the test PC but it is not enabled on the PC you are sitting at. So basically you have to use notepad through VNC which sucks. 2012/4/18 Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu Notepad is not enabled by default at each
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission
I didn't have problem accessing notepad in local PC. But never try to use notepad via VNC to candidate PC it's slow.. I think , we can use Remote Desktop to connect to UCCX use notepad there , rather than struggling with Test PC (through VNC small display) On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.comwrote: You can use notepad on the test PC but it is not enabled on the PC you are sitting at. So basically you have to use notepad through VNC which sucks. 2012/4/18 Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu Notepad is not enabled by default at each location? Peter - Original Message - From: Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:04 pm Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission To: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com, Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I think it depends on how early you like to get up and how close you are to each. RTP Test starts at 7:10. You get a 20 minutes lunch in a conference room and it is catered in and are done by 3:45. SJ Test starts at 8:30. You get a 40-45 minute lunch in a cafeteria with lots of choices. You are done with the test about 5:05. Computers are about the same, but you get access to notepad on your computer in RTP but not in SJ. I felt like the proctor at RTP is more helpful. From: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:44:36 -0400 To: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission Hi Guys, I am scheduling my first attempt today. I have heard many myths and rumors about different locations. I am trying to decide between RTP and San Jose. Someone want to share te pros and cons? (In case they really exist) Regards, -- Juan Carlos Anzola ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission
I think local proctor in each lab location , grades the Voice Lab. Because a remote person can't make test calls to verify. Strange part is ; I saw lab proctor making test calls (for previous candidates grading) BUT when I asked about a question requirement , he was not clear whether it's required or not. I'm wondering if 2 proctor's are involved in grading a CCIE Voice labs at remote locations. (one person to test calls other one to check configurations) Thanks On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Maria Bagamanova bagaman...@gmail.comwrote: You will have icons to telnet for each device on the desktop. Speed is ok. I took my labs in RTP. The proctor (David) is very helpful. The most important part, he will grade your lab. So, you can ask him will you give me points if I did so and so for this tasks... and he will answer. The time zone is important. My rack rentals start at 6am EST, lab in RTP starts at 7:05am EST, so at 7am EST I definitely ready for lab and I am not sleeping. Also, you don't have to spent money for travel at RTP. Hotel's shuttle will pick you up from the airport and drop you off at Test Center. They know Cisco address, building #3. After the lab hotel's shuttle can drive you to the airport from Cisco building. CCIE Voice #34861 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: maybe a stupid Q - but as I've not been in the lab yet: do we have telnet sessions available - or all console (low speed, specially for debug)? If so, is it on the same the local PC where we can use notepad? I guess the UCCX won't have a putty client on it - so using notepad over there is not ideal... cheers, Juan Op 19 april 2012 08:53 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: I didn't have problem accessing notepad in local PC. But never try to use notepad via VNC to candidate PC it's slow.. I think , we can use Remote Desktop to connect to UCCX use notepad there , rather than struggling with Test PC (through VNC small display) On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.comwrote: You can use notepad on the test PC but it is not enabled on the PC you are sitting at. So basically you have to use notepad through VNC which sucks. 2012/4/18 Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu Notepad is not enabled by default at each location? Peter - Original Message - From: Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:04 pm Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission To: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com, Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I think it depends on how early you like to get up and how close you are to each. RTP Test starts at 7:10. You get a 20 minutes lunch in a conference room and it is catered in and are done by 3:45. SJ Test starts at 8:30. You get a 40-45 minute lunch in a cafeteria with lots of choices. You are done with the test about 5:05. Computers are about the same, but you get access to notepad on your computer in RTP but not in SJ. I felt like the proctor at RTP is more helpful. From: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:44:36 -0400 To: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission Hi Guys, I am scheduling my first attempt today. I have heard many myths and rumors about different locations. I am trying to decide between RTP and San Jose. Someone want to share te pros and cons? (In case they really exist) Regards, -- Juan Carlos Anzola ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission
I agree. But if cisco gives non-voice proctor which test calls to do the expected result , he can grade voice candidates (without knowing anything in Voice) (Grading is based on whether your solution works don't look for a particular configuration method). Remaining parts will be done by grading script (search for exact keywords in router configuration , etc...) No re-reads possible no one can challenge the result. I have a doubt is this hapenning now. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.comwrote: Testing for SJ is performed remotely from what I understand. Plus all proctors are not necessarily CCIE in voice. They may be in R/S or something else. From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:52:24 +0530 To: Maria Bagamanova bagaman...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission I think local proctor in each lab location , grades the Voice Lab. Because a remote person can't make test calls to verify. Strange part is ; I saw lab proctor making test calls (for previous candidates grading) BUT when I asked about a question requirement , he was not clear whether it's required or not. I'm wondering if 2 proctor's are involved in grading a CCIE Voice labs at remote locations. (one person to test calls other one to check configurations) Thanks On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Maria Bagamanova bagaman...@gmail.comwrote: You will have icons to telnet for each device on the desktop. Speed is ok. I took my labs in RTP. The proctor (David) is very helpful. The most important part, he will grade your lab. So, you can ask him will you give me points if I did so and so for this tasks... and he will answer. The time zone is important. My rack rentals start at 6am EST, lab in RTP starts at 7:05am EST, so at 7am EST I definitely ready for lab and I am not sleeping. Also, you don't have to spent money for travel at RTP. Hotel's shuttle will pick you up from the airport and drop you off at Test Center. They know Cisco address, building #3. After the lab hotel's shuttle can drive you to the airport from Cisco building. CCIE Voice #34861 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: maybe a stupid Q - but as I've not been in the lab yet: do we have telnet sessions available - or all console (low speed, specially for debug)? If so, is it on the same the local PC where we can use notepad? I guess the UCCX won't have a putty client on it - so using notepad over there is not ideal... cheers, Juan Op 19 april 2012 08:53 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: I didn't have problem accessing notepad in local PC. But never try to use notepad via VNC to candidate PC it's slow.. I think , we can use Remote Desktop to connect to UCCX use notepad there , rather than struggling with Test PC (through VNC small display) On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.com wrote: You can use notepad on the test PC but it is not enabled on the PC you are sitting at. So basically you have to use notepad through VNC which sucks. 2012/4/18 Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu Notepad is not enabled by default at each location? Peter - Original Message - From: Mathew Miller miller.mat...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:04 pm Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission To: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com, Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I think it depends on how early you like to get up and how close you are to each. RTP Test starts at 7:10. You get a 20 minutes lunch in a conference room and it is catered in and are done by 3:45. SJ Test starts at 8:30. You get a 40-45 minute lunch in a cafeteria with lots of choices. You are done with the test about 5:05. Computers are about the same, but you get access to notepad on your computer in RTP but not in SJ. I felt like the proctor at RTP is more helpful. From: Juan Carlos Anzola juancarlosanz...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:44:36 -0400 To: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Location Decission Hi Guys, I am scheduling my first attempt today. I have heard many myths and rumors about different locations. I am trying to decide between RTP and San Jose. Someone want to share te pros and cons? (In case they really exist) Regards, -- Juan Carlos Anzola ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware Conferencing with different codecs
We configure HW conf bridge this way dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711u codec g711a codec g729r8 codec g729ar8 codec g729br8 codec g729abr8 maximum sessions 4 associate application sccp no shut Is it possible for different phones (which use different codecs as per different region) to enter into a single conference using this conference bridge ? Does hardware conference bridge does internal transcoding by itself or do we need to configure another dspfarm profile for transcoding as well? Thank You ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE CLI is Blank
When I initially log-in to CUE , it shows blank. When I press ENTER , cursor goes to next line , but no text displayed. Any quicker solution before reloading / resetting CUE ? R3#service-module se R3#service-module service-Engine 0/0 sess R3#service-module service-Engine 0/0 session Trying 10.10.112.2, 2194 ... Open R3#service-module service-Engine 0/0 session Trying 10.10.112.2, 2194 ... % Connection refused by remote host R3#service-module service-Engine 0/0 session clear [confirm] [OK] R3# [Resuming connection 1 to 10.10.112.2 ... ] [Connection to 10.10.112.2 closed by foreign host] R3# R3#service-module service-Engine 0/0 session Trying 10.10.112.2, 2194 ... Open ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn switch (dtmf-relay)
When configuring MGCP Gateway in CUCM , which type of dtmf-relay is recommended for CCIE Voice Lab ? (current gateway configuration or out-of-band)? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CTI RP vs DN
If we want to configure auto attendant in CUCM-CUC , the procedure is create a route point , configure an extension to it under line configuration set forward all to voicemail. We can do same thing without creating a CTI Route Point . Just create a directory number set forward all to voicemail under DN configuration. It works Why does cisco recommend to create a CTI Route Point (it's an unnecessary step) ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn switch type
I want to configure a 2811 Router as a MGCP Gateway using CUCM GUI. I can't find isdn switch-type primary-net5 under CUCM GUI mgcp endpoint configuration page. which one is equivalent to primary-net5 available in IOS ? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn switch type
Thanks all. I configured Euro it automatically configures primary-net5 in Router. Thanks. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com wrote: Euro Sent from my iPhone Pls pardon my fat fingers. On 10 Apr, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: I want to configure a 2811 Router as a MGCP Gateway using CUCM GUI. I can't find isdn switch-type primary-net5 under CUCM GUI mgcp endpoint configuration page. which one is equivalent to primary-net5 available in IOS ? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Directory Number Range
I want to add a range of Directory numbers to CUCM using GUI with identical properties. When I enter starting number final number in DN configuration page , all numbers get added. BUT remaining configuration features are applied to final DN number only. First DN numbers are added with default blank configuration. Any solution? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Directory Number Range
BAT works only after assigning these DNs to phones. I want to configure DNs fully , before associating with phones. On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Amit Singh batraji...@yahoo.com wrote: Add directory numbers and then use line bulk update tool to update all the properties. Sent from Samsung Galaxy Note Original message Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Directory Number Range From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com CC: I want to add a range of Directory numbers to CUCM using GUI with identical properties. When I enter starting number final number in DN configuration page , all numbers get added. BUT remaining configuration features are applied to final DN number only. First DN numbers are added with default blank configuration. Any solution? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: UCCX Script
Just try in redirect step directly to number 1002 (without using a variable) If script validation is successful , run a reactive-debugging with no agents logged in. From your screenshot , nothing seems wrong in the script basically. If there are agents logged-in what's the result? On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Chris devsin2...@gmail.com wrote: The attached is screen capture of the icd script and script. Task is to redirect the call to BR1PH2 1002, if there are no agents logged in. I reset the application and script few times. but call still doesn't get redirected to 1002. Can someone have a look at the script and tell where is the mistake. Best Regards Chris ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC Signalling (Ken Wyan)
https itself isn't a signalling protocol. But SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) works over https. SOAP isn't involved in call signalling , but helps for the functionality of Presence Feature. IPPM access URL via http. Good Topic for Deep Understaniding of Presence Feature On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.comwrote: So, would https be considered a signaling protocol at all? what about for IPPM ? sorry not clear how the protocol layering works when https is involved. thanks, /Baktha ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail Service
In proctorlabs CUCM (ver 7.0.1.x) , Voicemail doesn't appear as a phone service ( device settings Phone Services ) . Even Messages URL is empty (Entreprise Parameters). CCIE Exam also use 7.0.1 version , but there we can see voicemail service. Is this due to a version difference OR voicemail service was pre-deleted in Proctorlabs CUCM servers? http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmcip/xmldirectory.jsp ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] Brussels Lab in weekends
Hi, Thanks for information. It seems access to CCIE Lab also a challenge to first-attempt guys during weekends. Rooftop Cisco nameboard directs to wrong bulding nobody is there to show the correct place. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S t...@zitcom.dkwrote: The reception is closed. Just wait outside for the proctor Dont think about the weather. Just be focused Thomas Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com skrev: Hi, Is reception open on Sundays 8.00 am ? If not should we wait outside the building shivering in cold weather waiting for proctor? On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S t...@zitcom.dkwrote: You get pizza ;) I passed on a Sunday.! Med venlig hilsen | Best regards Thomas Raabo Senior Network Engineer CCIE #33466 _ t...@zitcom.dk | Direkte: +45 69 10 60 18 | Tlf.: +45 70 23 55 66 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] På vegne af Ken Wyan Sendt: 5. april 2012 20:27 Til: OSL Routing and Switching Emne: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Brussels Lab in weekends I saw Brussels CCIE Lab is open in weekends now. It's convenient for working people. But almost all seats are vacant in Sat Sunday. Is there any disadvantage / difficulty in doing test during weekends ? ( no food ?) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] Brussels Lab in weekends
Thanks Marko, This is very helpful to pass question number 0 for all tracks in Brussels. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.com wrote: Take a look at the video that Marko posted to YouTube... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bRbL_SOYfo I know that there are videos for RTP and San Jose as well. Thanks, Michael On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for information. It seems access to CCIE Lab also a challenge to first-attempt guys during weekends. Rooftop Cisco nameboard directs to wrong bulding nobody is there to show the correct place. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S t...@zitcom.dkwrote: The reception is closed. Just wait outside for the proctor Dont think about the weather. Just be focused Thomas Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com skrev: Hi, Is reception open on Sundays 8.00 am ? If not should we wait outside the building shivering in cold weather waiting for proctor? On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Thomas Raabo - Zitcom A/S t...@zitcom.dkwrote: You get pizza ;) I passed on a Sunday.! Med venlig hilsen | Best regards Thomas Raabo Senior Network Engineer CCIE #33466 _ t...@zitcom.dk | Direkte: +45 69 10 60 18 | Tlf.: +45 70 23 55 66 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] På vegne af Ken Wyan Sendt: 5. april 2012 20:27 Til: OSL Routing and Switching Emne: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Brussels Lab in weekends I saw Brussels CCIE Lab is open in weekends now. It's convenient for working people. But almost all seats are vacant in Sat Sunday. Is there any disadvantage / difficulty in doing test during weekends ? ( no food ?) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] the directories button display
from which document you found this?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu wrote:
You mean position flag as the the priority field?
Priority from low to high defines where in a list a Service should
appear: 1 = top of list, 50 (default) = middle,100 = bottom
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Rick Long rick.l...@ensi.com
Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 4:45 am
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] the directories button display
To: Joe Martini joem...@cisco.com, chase mergenthal
cm3_...@hotmail.com
Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, kew...@gmail.com
kew...@gmail.com
Joe,
Your solution is confirmed.
Works great and is much easier and quick!
Also, I must add that I had to leave the external directories url blank
on the phone else it
shows host not found and the directories header displays..
I am running CUCM System version: 7.0.1.11000-2 not sure if that
matters or not.
I also confirmed that the order of the listings is determined by the
aforementioned position
flag in the insert statement.
Because Intercom is not listed as an Enterprise parameter it doesn't
fill its 4th position as
it should and Corp directory ends up being 5th instead of 6th as the
flag indicates.
However, if the intercom service is associated with a phone Corp
Directory is listed 6th as it
should be.
So in order to change the order, you must remove all the services
except for voicemail and
re-insert them back in and change the position value to change the order
in which they are
listed. The insert must be done using the run sql insert statement
from a SSH session to the
server. Inserting manually will not give the desired order and will
cause services to be listed
alphabetically.
Thank you so much for your input, it has been very helpful and
appreciated.
Rick Long
From: Joe Martini [
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:59 PM
To: chase mergenthal
Cc: felipe_segn...@hotmail.com; kew...@gmail.com; ccie voice; Rick Long
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] the directories button display
No, but you can configure on the phone(s) with external services
provisioned a Messages URL of
If you test this out though you'll see that the messages button acts a
little differently
than the Application:Cisco/Voicemail.
On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:35 PM, chase mergenthal wrote:
Would voice mail still work?
-Chase
--
If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the
phrase, Quit while you're
still ahead.?
From: felipe_segn...@hotmail.com
To: kew...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:47:13 -0600
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] the directories button display
Hello All,
Basically if what you want to accomplish is restrict a user to have
access to the Directories
button and keep the order of the of the Missed Calls/Received Calls etc;
I think that we do not
even have to delete the URLs from the phone services.
What I think would work, is to use on this particular phone where you
want to restrict the
directories the service provisioning setting as External URL.
If you do this, the IP Phone will try to use the URL configured under
Enterprise parameters,
by default: If we leave this URL configured
and set the service provisioning to external, the directories will
still show up. So in order
to get the No service configured message, just delete the Directories
URL from enterprise
parameters (leave it blank).
By default, the other IP Phones, will still continue using Service
Provisioning Internal
which means they will get the URLs from their configuration file.
So, summary:
1. Set service provisioning to External URL to the phone where you want
to restrict
Directories access.
2. Leave the directories URL from enterprise parameter blank.
3. Reset the phone.
Reference:
HTH
Felipe Segnini.
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:58:57 +0530
From: kew...@gmail.com
To: joem...@cisco.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] the directories button display
Hi,
Let's try to understand this sql command to find a way to change order.
We should run below to restore Corporate Directory.
run sql insert into telecasterservice
(pkid,Name,NameASCII,Description,URLTemplate,tkPhoneService,EnterpriseSubscription,Priority)
values('7eca2cf1-0c8d-4df4-a807-124b18fe89a4','Corporate
Directory','Corporate
Directory','Corporate
Directory','Application:Cisco/CorporateDirectory',1,'t',6)
Does anybody know about these parameters?
tkPhoneService default 1
Prioritydefault 6
On Tue, Apr
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] the directories button display
Hi,
Let's try to understand this sql command to find a way to change order.
We should run below to restore Corporate Directory.
run sql insert into telecasterservice
(pkid,Name,NameASCII,Description,URLTemplate,tkPhoneService,EnterpriseSubscription,Priority)
values('7eca2cf1-0c8d-4df4-a807-124b18fe89a4','Corporate
Directory','Corporate Directory','Corporate
Directory','Application:Cisco/CorporateDirectory',1,'t',6)
Does anybody know about these parameters?
tkPhoneService default 1
Prioritydefault 6
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Joe Martini joem...@cisco.com wrote:
If you use the restore sql statement you'll find that the directories are
listed in alphabetical order so Corporate Directory shows up first after
pressing the Directories Button.
On Apr 2, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Rick Long wrote:
Search for restoring in Cisco Call Manager 7.01 release notes
It will give you the sql statements that you need to reapply to CUCM after
removing the services.
HTH
Rick Long
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 9:55 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 74, Issue 8
Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Directories Question (Pablo Meneses)
2. Re: UCCX failure updating rmcm user on Callmanager
(Baktha Muralidharan)
3. Re: UCCX failure updating rmcm user on Callmanager
(Gurpreet Singh Kukreja)
4. Re: switch-QoS-Quick Question (steven moran)
5. Re: switch-QoS-Quick Question (Jurassic Labs)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:45:45 -0600
From: Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com
To: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Directories Question
Message-ID:
CABz8te5zz15QHDkj3D8gRaqZz-T-7jzjKYGtpB=r6+nUH=+x...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi Experts,
Does anybody know how to make sure that the directories button display the
services in the correct order after you have disabled Enterprise
Subscription by deleting and adding the services back?
Thanks in advance.
-Pablo Meneses.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120402/92f7c187/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:47:27 -0400
From: Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX failure updating rmcm user on
Callmanager
Message-ID:
ca+ne39upbj1k_n-0zmfccwkuhto+tbf9vianfz164hojasg...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Thanks to all for the tips/suggestions-
Does uccx automatically create the rmcm application user or do we need to
manually create it?
I don't remember having to create it in the past. whenever, the uccx was
partially integrated, I used to be able to do the following-
- go into uccx and create/complete telephony-group and rmcm (resources,
skills etc.)
- on UCM, associate users to rmcm application user
- configure application/trigger etc.
thanks,
/Baktha
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120402/14032129/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:00:52 -0400
From: Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.com
To: Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX failure updating rmcm user on
Callmanager
Message-ID:
CABmpSZQALgAH4b4uL+auSZP4C=y9go8ystix-q5eufpc6g1...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hey Baktha,
When you run the Fresh Install setup from UCCX the first time, those users
are created automatically and the CTI Enabled role is also assigned to them
at the same time; no need for manual intervention.
However, the steps i suggested was to bring back the RM Subsystem back in
service on the CCX if it does not automatically.
Let me know if you have more questions.
Regards
Gurpreet
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks to all for the tips/suggestions-
Does
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC Signalling
Take typical integration of CUCM to Unity Connection sccp integration CUPC client is used to check voicemail / mwi CUPC Client --sip signalling- CUPS Server CUCM Server --sccp signalling- Unity Connection CUPC Client --sip signalling- CUCM Server CUCM Server -sip signalling- CUPS Server CUPC Client - ? signalling Unity Connection When CUPC client access voice mail mwi indications , does it use SCCP signalling ? OR does CUCM acts as a signalling proxy between CUPC client Unity connection server for sccp/sip translation? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] tftp-server syntax
I have 2821 3825 Routers (IOS 12.4T) want to know which command works best in all theses routers. 1. service aa flash:bacdprompts/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.tcl 2. service aa flash:/bacdprompts/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.tcl 3. service aa flash://bacdprompts/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.tcl Also under this service 1. paramspace english location flash:bacdprompts/ 2. paramspace english location flash:/bacdprompts/ 3. paramspace english location flash://bacdprompts/ Which option 1/2/3 is best? In AA scripts it's very diffcult to troubleshoot unless we configure correct one. Thanks in advance ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] multiple AA services (bacd)
I have first AA service (of BACD) pointing to a hunt-group (ephone-hunt). If call is not answered it should reach 2nd AA service. Should I use 2nd AA pilot number in hunt-group final destination OR as voicemail of 1st AA ? service aa1 param aa-pilot 100 param voice-mail 200 -- (option 1) service aa2 param aa-pilot 200 ephone-hunt 1 final 200 ---? (option 2) Cisco docs say to use option 1 , but my testing works with option 2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] multiple AA services (bacd)
Ok, I realized issue , to avoid loops. Thanks On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: I have first AA service (of BACD) pointing to a hunt-group (ephone-hunt). If call is not answered it should reach 2nd AA service. Should I use 2nd AA pilot number in hunt-group final destination OR as voicemail of 1st AA ? service aa1 param aa-pilot 100 param voice-mail 200 -- (option 1) service aa2 param aa-pilot 200 ephone-hunt 1 final 200 ---? (option 2) Cisco docs say to use option 1 , but my testing works with option 2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] multiple AA services (bacd)
I think only one queue service ( equivalent to app-b-acd) is allowed in a Router but multiple aa services are allowed. Am I correct? We can define multiple queues under same queue service as below. service app-b-acd param aa-hunt1 1000 param aa-hunt2 2000 queue-len 5 ephone-hunt 1 pilot 1000 list 1001 1002 ephone-hunt 2 pilot 2000 list 2001 2002 Actually queue-len 5 refers to what? Is it for total queued calls under app-b-acd service OR each queue ( 1000 or 2000 ) can have maximum queue-depth or 2 ? Thank You. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I realized issue , to avoid loops. Thanks On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: I have first AA service (of BACD) pointing to a hunt-group (ephone-hunt). If call is not answered it should reach 2nd AA service. Should I use 2nd AA pilot number in hunt-group final destination OR as voicemail of 1st AA ? service aa1 param aa-pilot 100 param voice-mail 200 -- (option 1) service aa2 param aa-pilot 200 ephone-hunt 1 final 200 ---? (option 2) Cisco docs say to use option 1 , but my testing works with option 2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] multiple AA services (bacd)
Hi Juan, I think cisco suggests to directly send call to aa2 from aa1 without routing through hunt-group (final 200). following is timer definitions. param call-retry-timer 15 ;Time interval in which call in queue can attempt to access available ephone-dns and voice mail. param second-greeting-time 60 ;Delay before second greeting is played. param max-time-call-retry 600 ;Maximum time calls can wait in queue. param max-time-vm-retry 2 ;Maximum time calls can attempt to be transferred to voice mail. Is this call-retry-timer does the same thing as timeout under ephone-hunt ? Seems replaced by timeout if we configure. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: Ken, what was the issue? Op 19 maart 2012 11:18 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: Ok, I realized issue , to avoid loops. Thanks On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: I have first AA service (of BACD) pointing to a hunt-group (ephone-hunt). If call is not answered it should reach 2nd AA service. Should I use 2nd AA pilot number in hunt-group final destination OR as voicemail of 1st AA ? service aa1 param aa-pilot 100 param voice-mail 200 -- (option 1) service aa2 param aa-pilot 200 ephone-hunt 1 final 200 ---? (option 2) Cisco docs say to use option 1 , but my testing works with option 2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] multiple AA services (bacd)
Yes , I did read it found after sending email. Still what's confusing to me is how to use param voice-mail (under queue service) instead of final (under ephone-hunt) Which timers do we tune under app-b-acd-aa for this requirement ? (going to test it ; but your advices welcome) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Ken, I think most of your questions are answered in the Cisco Unified CME B-ACD and Tcl Call-Handling Applicationshttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/bacd/configuration/guide/cme40tcl.html in short: - 1 queue service can service multiple AAs - call-retry-timer 15 means the queue service will try to connect to huntgroup member or voicemail destination every 15 sec - timeout under ephone-hunt refers to RNA timeout - queue-length refers to max callers in queue per AA service - so 5 callers in queue for each AA Op 19 maart 2012 14:55 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: Hi Juan, I think cisco suggests to directly send call to aa2 from aa1 without routing through hunt-group (final 200). following is timer definitions. param call-retry-timer 15 ;Time interval in which call in queue can attempt to access available ephone-dns and voice mail. param second-greeting-time 60 ;Delay before second greeting is played. param max-time-call-retry 600 ;Maximum time calls can wait in queue. param max-time-vm-retry 2 ;Maximum time calls can attempt to be transferred to voice mail. Is this call-retry-timer does the same thing as timeout under ephone-hunt ? Seems replaced by timeout if we configure. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: Ken, what was the issue? Op 19 maart 2012 11:18 schreef Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com het volgende: Ok, I realized issue , to avoid loops. Thanks On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: I have first AA service (of BACD) pointing to a hunt-group (ephone-hunt). If call is not answered it should reach 2nd AA service. Should I use 2nd AA pilot number in hunt-group final destination OR as voicemail of 1st AA ? service aa1 param aa-pilot 100 param voice-mail 200 -- (option 1) service aa2 param aa-pilot 200 ephone-hunt 1 final 200 ---? (option 2) Cisco docs say to use option 1 , but my testing works with option 2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Pattern DDI
In Route pattern configuration page , under DDI what's the difference between the selectebale options None No Digits ? Also why PREDOT DDI is not available in Route group DDI box ? (we have to select NANP DDI even if we don't use @ patterns) Thanks in Advance ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab in hong Kong
KiWi, Thanks for details. My surprise is you say Belgium is local lab . Do you have all voice servers / Routers next to you? If so a unique experience as all other places access a remote POD. Ken On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com wrote: Personally I went 3 different locations before for voice. I rate 1) sydney the highest due to their proctor (maybe it's a small group always?). He will give some advise before the lab (although it's more for rs). Nearer to my location as well. When asked him question about my concern, he told me that this wasn't part of their test plan. I pass here. 2) Belgium --- got food voucher, free flow of food for your lunch! It's a local lab. Definitely everything is better here. Proctor is ok, will get back to your question after checking their note or marking scheme. 3) HK --- nearest to my location, cheapest. However, when I have my lab attempt there I always encounter fancy problems which I don't think I can go into detail. I think it's cater to deter people from cheating but it wasted part of your time in order to troubleshoot those issue. Those are IMO. Your mileage may varies. Sent from my iPhone Pls pardon my fat fingers. On 11 Mar, 2012, at 3:07 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Indigoboy, Did he pass Voice or another CCIE track? On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:42 PM, indigoboy indigo...@gmail.com wrote: A friend of mine flew from New Dehli to HK and passed. He didn't say anything negative about the experience. On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rahul, No responses so far means no one has gone to HK Lab. Seats are available , but I saw bad remarks on HongKong Lab in other forums. Your India location may be a better choise than Hong Kong. Ken On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Friends , I am planning to give my ccie voice lab in hong Kong. can anybody share the experience ? thx, Rahul ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab in hong Kong
Hi Rahul, No responses so far means no one has gone to HK Lab. Seats are available , but I saw bad remarks on HongKong Lab in other forums. Your India location may be a better choise than Hong Kong. Ken On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Friends , I am planning to give my ccie voice lab in hong Kong. can anybody share the experience ? thx, Rahul ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab in hong Kong
Hi Indigoboy, Did he pass Voice or another CCIE track? On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:42 PM, indigoboy indigo...@gmail.com wrote: A friend of mine flew from New Dehli to HK and passed. He didn't say anything negative about the experience. On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rahul, No responses so far means no one has gone to HK Lab. Seats are available , but I saw bad remarks on HongKong Lab in other forums. Your India location may be a better choise than Hong Kong. Ken On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Friends , I am planning to give my ccie voice lab in hong Kong. can anybody share the experience ? thx, Rahul ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Upload
To upload prompts to UCCX , we have to select either one of following folders. en_US default en All of them works fine. But for exam what's the best recommendation? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] service-policy on trunk ports
Thanks Vik for your clarification On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: This is and has been for a long time been a limitation on the 3750- the show policy-map command doesn't work:-( Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Ken Wyan wrote: I have following scenario (Tested in Proctorlabs Rack). HQ Switch Fa1/0/1 (trunk port) ---connect to-- HQ Router Fa0/0 (with sub-interfaces) I want to apply a service-policy to mgcp packets going through this link. I configured access-list , class-map , policy-map applied to switch interface. But I can't see any mgcp packets matching HQ-3750#show policy-map interface fastEthernet 1/0/1 FastEthernet1/0/1 Service-policy input: mgcp Class-map: mgcp (match-all) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: access-group 100 Class-map: class-default (match-any) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: any 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute rate 0 bps interface FastEthernet1/0/1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 10 switchport mode trunk speed 100 duplex full mls qos trust dscp service-policy input mgcp *Now same thing I configured on HQ Router ( Fa0/0 interface) , then I can see packets are matching with service policy.* What can be the reason? (Switch accepts service-policy in input direction only , hence I applied service-policy in output direction on Router port) Can this be a limitation for trunk (multi-vlan) ports on switches ? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Numbers ?
Based on numbers , pass rate is very high. ( yes there should be a lot of unallocated numbers ) But for Voice , still very very rare if someone pass his first try. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: Only Cisco knows. One thing for sure is that the pass rate was very very high (based on numbers) and this cannot (in my opinion) be without suspicion. If the numbers have flattened I would think they have found and addressed the source of the problem. Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 4, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Ken Wyan wrote: CCIE Numbers reached 30,000 in last September. In January they were giving 34k numbers . Now in March still 34k numbers. Seems pass-rate has dropped in year 2012 ? Lab or Grading seems got tougher this year. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge during SRST
If they ask You are not allowed to have learned ephone details in running configuration I will configure telephony-service srst mode auto provision none srst ephone template 1 ephone template 1 softkeys remote-in-use cBarge NewCall ephone 1 privacy off ephone 2 privacy off Is there any possibility of interpretting my answer as wrong ? Ken On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: You have to disable privacy at the ephone level (in IOS 12.4x). Disabling privacy at the telephony-service level and template level does not work. Therefore you must have srst mode auto-prov all in order to preserve cbarge. So I would expect that if you are required to preserve cBarge, the words do not pre-define any ephone or ephone-dn to *not* restrict the learned ephones/dn's from showing up in the running config. The problem I have with not creating any pre-defined ephones/dn's is that you must have a pre-defined ephone-dn for the conference ad-hoc so I'm not sure if this question is possible. Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 4, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Vega Wong wrote: Hi All, Let say we need to make sure the same call feature remains during SRST, and there is a share line with cbarge during normal CUCM operation. However, if the requirement is Do not pre-define any ephone or ephone-dn in running-config how would you interupt this? The simplest way is to use srst mode auto-provision none. The issue with this command is that cBarge during SRST would not work. So if we use srst mode auto-provision all, the configure in running-config will be learnt during SRST. would that still consider as pre-define? Cheers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCME time format
Can we change date display seperator ( / slash , - dash , . dot ) in CUCME call-manager fallback similar to CUCM. Is there any command except date-format , time-format in CME for this? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Numbers ?
CCIE Numbers reached 30,000 in last September. In January they were giving 34k numbers . Now in March still 34k numbers. Seems pass-rate has dropped in year 2012 ? Lab or Grading seems got tougher this year. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] service-policy on trunk ports
I have following scenario (Tested in Proctorlabs Rack). HQ Switch Fa1/0/1 (trunk port) ---connect to-- HQ Router Fa0/0 (with sub-interfaces) I want to apply a service-policy to mgcp packets going through this link. I configured access-list , class-map , policy-map applied to switch interface. But I can't see any mgcp packets matching HQ-3750#show policy-map interface fastEthernet 1/0/1 FastEthernet1/0/1 Service-policy input: mgcp Class-map: mgcp (match-all) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: access-group 100 Class-map: class-default (match-any) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: any 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute rate 0 bps interface FastEthernet1/0/1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 10 switchport mode trunk speed 100 duplex full mls qos trust dscp service-policy input mgcp *Now same thing I configured on HQ Router ( Fa0/0 interface) , then I can see packets are matching with service policy.* What can be the reason? (Switch accepts service-policy in input direction only , hence I applied service-policy in output direction on Router port) Can this be a limitation for trunk (multi-vlan) ports on switches ? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] saving script in script respoitory
Yes, After modifying script ( from the place where you saved using UCCX editor) ; you have to re-upload it. Don't try to edit scripts in script repository manually. But you can copy system scripts from there. (not the scripts you uploaded via GUI) HTH On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.comwrote: Datucha, Ken, thanks for the answers. Here is my confusion- after uploading a script (which I understand gets saved in script repository), if I want to change the script, I would expect to see it in script repository, correct? I don't see see the script that I just saved in the script repository. so, I am having to save it in some other folder, and upload the script again. /Baktha On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: From script editor you can save in script repository it works. BUT then reactive debugging option is not available. Better to do Datucha's method. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:08 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Well, as I remember, the Scipts must not be saved in Repository from Script Editor. When you make upload of scripts from UCCX Web interface, it makes the script saving in repository. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks When I try to save (from CCX script editor) a script into script repository, I get an error as follows- java.lang.NullPointerException Unsupported domain any hints on what might be wrong? thanks in advance, /Baktha ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] saving script in script respoitory
From script editor you can save in script repository it works. BUT then reactive debugging option is not available. Better to do Datucha's method. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:08 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.comwrote: Well, as I remember, the Scipts must not be saved in Repository from Script Editor. When you make upload of scripts from UCCX Web interface, it makes the script saving in repository. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks When I try to save (from CCX script editor) a script into script repository, I get an error as follows- java.lang.NullPointerException Unsupported domain any hints on what might be wrong? thanks in advance, /Baktha ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME MWI Error (using SIP MWI)
I use SIP sub-notify method for mwi. It needs mwi-relay under telephony-service mwi sip under ephone-dn s. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Baktha Muralidharan muralic...@gmail.comwrote: Ken, can you explain why you need mwi-relay? Thanks, /Baktha -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:37:48 +0530 From: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME MWI Error (using SIP MWI) Message-ID: capbg9blddzckovtjx45qtvfo2brnj_ptwa_vq86yz02jpty...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 When I configure mwi relay command under telephony-service , I get following error message Error registring to service SIP_MWI, reason MWI_API_CLIENT_EXISTS What may be the reason? Ken -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120229/5fddcfd6/attachment-0001.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME MWI Error (using SIP MWI)
When I configure mwi relay command under telephony-service , I get following error message Error registring to service SIP_MWI, reason MWI_API_CLIENT_EXISTS What may be the reason? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Tragic news
Dear Emanuel, Very sad news. My greatest sympothy for your friend all of our study partner. Ken On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.comwrote: Hello brothers, I just like to let you know that my friend and study partner, Jeferson Guardia CCIE #28157, has passed away yesterday. He was a skateboarder and day before yesterday, he fell, hitting his head. He didn't want to go to the hospital, because he thought he was ok. According to his father he passed in his sleep due to a blood clot in his brain. This is a tragic moment for all his family and friends. I thought I should share this with you guys because he's been very active here on the list, and we were studying together for the CCIE Voice. He was a great motivator and helped me get out of my personal problems so I could focus on my studies. It's sad how life is, and what shocks everybody the most is that he was only 24 years old (soon to be 25 on March 20th). Mourning, but still on the fight... =( *Emanuel Damasceno* CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Number of SIP Trunks
Hi, If we send a call to PSTN through ISDN debug isdn q931 shows the number , type , plan of calling called numbers. If we use a SIP ITSP ( using a sip trunk from CUCM) , what's the easiest method ? If SIP Invite message has following text , is it 100% sure that I am sending full e.164 number to SIP ITSP? From: HQPH2 sip:+12123945002@10.10.210.11 Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs Voice sessions and RTP Audio problem
I also experience same problems regarding RTP audio. Sometimes IPBlue services softkey doesn't work. But CIPC / softphone registration problems are strange. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:48 PM, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi All, I experienced some problems while doing full lab yesterday and I'd like to know if you have any thoughts or ideas. I used XP vm machine for each site with two network cards for each site (NAT), IP Blue softphone (multiple instances), Cisco VPN client but had some problems: - I couldn't register CIPC to Call Manager (manually or auto registeration) - No audio heard (for example) if the call can't go to PSTN - No audio when listening to Voice Mail , couldn't drop message ..etc - Services button didn't work with IP Blue and gives script error - UCCX ICD audio can't be heard I wander if I my setup is correct or I missed something. Waiting for your thoughts. Khaled ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] srst softkeys
I configured srst ( using telephony-service) . When phones are in fallback mode Redial softkey is dimmed on 7965 phones. As per cisco docs , only unsupported softkeys are dimmed in srst mode. Is this normal or can be any mistake? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Q.931 Translator
Hi, Using Q.931 Translator , we could translate CUCM trace files to equivalent IOS ISDN messages. I couldn't find it in CUCM ver 7. Is it available with CUCM 7 or otherwise what's the option in this release? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
