Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread James Holmes

Works for me.

--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/


On 11 May 2011 11:26, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:

 You could always both swap to a real database:

 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/express-edition/overview/index.html

 Your DB2 link is broken.

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344439
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread James Holmes

No. Not all DB's are equal just because they all run SQL.

--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/



On 11 May 2011 10:45, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:

 They are all real databases.  The majority of  the problems that
 website databases have are caused by badly written code, inefficient
 queries and poor performance tuning, and have nothing to do with the
 database platfor

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:30
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread Russ Michaels

Funnily enough I looked into Oracle Express recently for a client, and it is
not actually suitable for web apps. It is primarily intended for mobile
platforms or portable media.

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:58 AM, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.comwrote:


 No. Not all DB's are equal just because they all run SQL.

 --
 WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
 http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/



 On 11 May 2011 10:45, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  They are all real databases.  The majority of  the problems that
  website databases have are caused by badly written code, inefficient
  queries and poor performance tuning, and have nothing to do with the
  database platfor

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:31
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread Jenny Gavin-Wear

Will, I pinched some of Gerald's popcorn and had a good read, thanks for all
the replies.  It has been very interesting reading the discussion on the
various DB's.

Overall, SQL Server Express is coming out on top for me.  My existing
databases don't get anywhere near the 10GB limit, and I wouldn't have any
issues transfering my existing code straight across, apart from one issue.
I read that SQL 2008 Express does not include DTS/SSIS, can anyone confirm
that please?

Are there any other limitations / pitfalls of using SQL 2008 Express?  I'm
also wondering if there is much of a learning curve, not so much as for new
features in 2008, but just in supporting my existing databases?

I will need to run SQL 2008 Express alongside SQL 2000 on the same server
while I port everything across.  Any issues I might encounter?

Many thanks,

Jenny Gavin-Wear
Fast Track Online
Tel: 01262 602013
http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/




No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3629 - Release Date: 05/10/11
19:34:00



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:39
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread Russ Michaels

Here is a complete feature matrix.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645993.aspx

I'm sure I used SSIS with 2005 Express, so I would expect it is with 2008.
You certainly have import/export services anyway.
Just make sure you get SQL Server Express with Tools.
If you find features missing from the Management Studio express, there is a
little cheat, you can download the FULL EDITION trial of SQL Server 2008
with tools, and get the full edition of Management Studio, which i'm pretty
sure never expires, at least it didn't with 2005.

The learning curve will be with using the new Management Studio rather than
Enterprise manager, although I believe you can still use enterprise manager
up to a point.
Other than that your database will work the same unless you choose to learn
and implement and of the new features. 2008 is miles apart from 2000.



On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear 
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:


 Will, I pinched some of Gerald's popcorn and had a good read, thanks for
 all
 the replies.  It has been very interesting reading the discussion on the
 various DB's.

 Overall, SQL Server Express is coming out on top for me.  My existing
 databases don't get anywhere near the 10GB limit, and I wouldn't have any
 issues transfering my existing code straight across, apart from one issue.
 I read that SQL 2008 Express does not include DTS/SSIS, can anyone confirm
 that please?

 Are there any other limitations / pitfalls of using SQL 2008 Express?  I'm
 also wondering if there is much of a learning curve, not so much as for new
 features in 2008, but just in supporting my existing databases?

 I will need to run SQL 2008 Express alongside SQL 2000 on the same server
 while I port everything across.  Any issues I might encounter?

 Many thanks,

 Jenny Gavin-Wear
 Fast Track Online
 Tel: 01262 602013
 http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/




 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3629 - Release Date: 05/10/11
 19:34:00



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344451
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Von Stetten

lol. ;-)

On 5/10/2011 8:26 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
 You could always both swap to a real database:

 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/express-edition/overview/index.html
 Your DB2 link is broken.

 Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
 http://www.figleaf.com/
 http://training.figleaf.com/

 Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
 GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
 instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite.

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344461
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread M P

I second the comment on Navicat. It's intuitive and easy to use and the new 
Premium edition supports MS-SQL as well as MySQL, Postgre, Oracle and SQLite. 
And no, I don't have any affiliation with them, I just love their product :-)

I've converted several databases from MS-SQL to MySQL with no problems 
whatsoever. I now use Navicat exclusively to manage all of my client databases 
and I haven't even had to install the dreaded SQL Enterprise Manager on my new 
system (which makes me extremely happy because I can't stand Enterprise 
Manager).

For backups or transferring to a new server, I think Navicat is MUCH easier and 
more intuitive than Microsoft's built-in tools. Even moving a database from one 
MS-SQL Server to another is just a couple of clicks of the mouse.

With regards to the comment about the type of backup, I actually just schedule 
a nightly sync from my Production DB to a dedicated backup version on the 
Staging Server (or Development Server for clients that don't have a staging 
environment). This way, we actually have a LIVE fail over we can bring online 
almost immediately, while we repair or replace the Production server. I realize 
that might not be an option for all situations (especially really large DBs), 
but it's worked extremely well for me over the years.

I've never seen a MySQL database get corrupted and I've worked with hundreds of 
them (though granted most of them were fairly small).

Just my 2 cents worth.

-Mike


I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.

Many thanks,

Jenny
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date: 05/08/11
19:34:00 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344462
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread Carl Von Stetten

While installing the trial of SQL Server 2008 will get you the full 
Management Studio and Business Development Studio (or whatever it is 
called in 2008, and is required for developing SSIS solutions), SQL 
Server Express does not have the SSIS service.  You have to have at 
least one full SQL Server 2008 server somewhere to have an SSIS 
service.  You might consider purchasing SQL Server 2008 Developer 
Edition (which should be about $50) which is essentially a fully 
functioning version of SQL Server 2008 Enterprise with the licensing 
restriction that it only be used for development and not production.

Link to Developer Edition on MicrosoftStore.com: 
http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/en_US/pd/productID.221634300/search.true

HTH,
Carl

On 5/11/2011 8:08 AM, Russ Michaels wrote:
 I'm sure I used SSIS with 2005 Express, so I would expect it is with 2008.
 You certainly have import/export services anyway.
 Just make sure you get SQL Server Express with Tools.
 If you find features missing from the Management Studio express, there is a
 little cheat, you can download the FULL EDITION trial of SQL Server 2008
 with tools, and get the full edition of Management Studio, which i'm pretty
 sure never expires, at least it didn't with 2005.

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344464
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread Eric Cobb

FWIW, here's some code for automating the backup process in SQL Server 
Express:
http://www.cfgears.com/index.cfm/2010/7/20/Automating-backups-for-SQL-Server-Express

Thanks,

Eric Cobb
http://www.cfgears.com
Help me make a difference this summer -http://bit.ly/i8dJvQ


On 5/11/2011 1:36 PM, Carl Von Stetten wrote:
 While installing the trial of SQL Server 2008 will get you the full
 Management Studio and Business Development Studio (or whatever it is
 called in 2008, and is required for developing SSIS solutions), SQL
 Server Express does not have the SSIS service.  You have to have at
 least one full SQL Server 2008 server somewhere to have an SSIS
 service.  You might consider purchasing SQL Server 2008 Developer
 Edition (which should be about $50) which is essentially a fully
 functioning version of SQL Server 2008 Enterprise with the licensing
 restriction that it only be used for development and not production.

 Link to Developer Edition on MicrosoftStore.com:
 http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/en_US/pd/productID.221634300/search.true

 HTH,
 Carl

 On 5/11/2011 8:08 AM, Russ Michaels wrote:
 I'm sure I used SSIS with 2005 Express, so I would expect it is with 2008.
 You certainly have import/export services anyway.
 Just make sure you get SQL Server Express with Tools.
 If you find features missing from the Management Studio express, there is a
 little cheat, you can download the FULL EDITION trial of SQL Server 2008
 with tools, and get the full edition of Management Studio, which i'm pretty
 sure never expires, at least it didn't with 2005.
 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344465
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-11 Thread Jenny Gavin-Wear

Thanks for the info on Navicat, it looks really great, but I'm going to
stick with SQL Express for now.

Installing/testing  SQL 2008 Express went extremely well.  I'll need to get
my head around the changes in FULLTEXT.

If anyone else is looking at Express, I've blogged the installation notes:-

http://fasttrackonline.blogspot.com/2011/05/coldfusion-and-microsot-sql-expr
ess-r2.html

Enjoy!

Jenny Gavin-Wear
Fast Track Online
Tel: 01262 602013
http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/


-Original Message-
From: M P [mailto:miketot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 May 2011 19:48
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release



I second the comment on Navicat. It's intuitive and easy to use
and the new Premium edition supports MS-SQL as well as MySQL,
Postgre, Oracle and SQLite. And no, I don't have any affiliation
with them, I just love their product :-)

I've converted several databases from MS-SQL to MySQL with no
problems whatsoever. I now use Navicat exclusively to manage all
of my client databases and I haven't even had to install the
dreaded SQL Enterprise Manager on my new system (which makes me
extremely happy because I can't stand Enterprise Manager).

For backups or transferring to a new server, I think Navicat is
MUCH easier and more intuitive than Microsoft's built-in tools.
Even moving a database from one MS-SQL Server to another is just
a couple of clicks of the mouse.

With regards to the comment about the type of backup, I actually
just schedule a nightly sync from my Production DB to a dedicated
backup version on the Staging Server (or Development Server for
clients that don't have a staging environment). This way, we
actually have a LIVE fail over we can bring online almost
immediately, while we repair or replace the Production server. I
realize that might not be an option for all situations
(especially really large DBs), but it's worked extremely well for
me over the years.

I've never seen a MySQL database get corrupted and I've worked
with hundreds of them (though granted most of them were fairly small).

Just my 2 cents worth.

-Mike


I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.

Many thanks,

Jenny
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date: 05/08/11
19:34:00



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344467
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Michaels

Judah,

Yes it is nice to have power, but it is rather like buying a Porshe to drive
around town at 30MPH, sure you can brag about it and tell everyone how you
could drive at 200mph if you wanted to, but really you are never going to do
it, and a more practical car is really going to do a better job for you in
that scenario.

My comments are based on my own *REAL WORLD* experience hosting hundreds of
databases over many years, rather than as a developer building a single
database/website. but in those years I have experienced the following, which
is why I will always prefer/recommend MSSQL.

MySQL databases corrupt quite easily and need to be repaired (even on
dedicated machines)
Never had a MSSQL corruption problem since MSSQL 2000
MySQL  will easily get overloaded by a single database and consume 100% CPU
requiring a restart, only experienced this on v4 so far though.
Never had that problem on MSSQL
MySQL is a PITA to backup and restore, time consuming and quirky and dumps
not always reliable.
MSSQL is simple and quick to backup/restore/migrate.
Our MSSQL servers are able to host far more databases than the MySQL
servers.

Now granted the limits on Express edition would mean you could not host HUGE
memory/CPU hogging databases, but as I said, this scenario is quite rare,
most people's databases do not come anywhere near this and the Express
edition will handle them just fine, so it certainly is not just good for
development. We ran SQL 2005 express for years in a shared hosting
environment with no problems at all, the limits did not cause any problems
for a long time. We managed to get a lot of databases on the server until it
started to run out of power, and now we use SQL Server 2008 web edition,
which is actually very cheap to run.
Again I would point out that if you are in the need of great power and
reliability, then you should be running your own server and probably not
running the free editions anyway.

The problem with databases and database servers is that most developers
really don;t know much about them, and will just throw together a basic
database and rely on the servers out of the box config. In this area MSSQL
shines, as you can install it out of the box with no tweaking and it will
run like a dream.

With MySQL on the other hand you really need a deeper understanding of how
it works to be able to fine tune its performance and you also need to
understand the different database engines it utilises and when to use them,
again something most people do not do, which adds to the
reliability/performance issues with databases.

To be honest this is somewhat of a rarity as M$ products are usually not
known for being the best, often it is the 3rd party products which are
superior, but you also have to remember that M$ did not originally create
SQL Server, it was originally Sybase. So if you are in the anti-Microsoft
camp you may find this history of SQL server interesting.

http://insidesqlserver.com/companion/History%20of%20SQL%20Server.pdf

At the end of the day this is just my opinion/experience, you do not have to
agree with it.


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:


 MySql is free though licensing is a bit complicated because of a
 dual-license model. The community edition includes many enterprise
 sorts of features like replication and partitioning. If I recall,
 there are additional backup tools and monitoring in the paid
 enterprise edition. If you want to go completely free from the weird
 Oracle ownership stuff (which I think is wise, personally), there is
 the MariaDB fork which is entirely FOSS as far as I know. What
 enterprise features are you thinking aren't in the community
 edition?

 MySql community edition has none of the limitations present in MS SQL
 Express edition. Honestly, not taking advantage of more than a gig of
 RAM or 1 cpu core is just stupid. Why would you even have a database
 server? I suppose if you are housing the db on the same machine as
 your app server then...well, you have plenty of other problems at that
 point.

 Sql Express is great for development (though I prefer developer
 edition myself). It is not meant for production websites, period.
 That's why Microsoft has a Web edition. I like SQL Server and use it
 but it is wrong to try and compare Sql Express and MySql community
 edition, they are completely different classes of software.

 That being said, I still think people should check out PostGres. A
 feature set comparable to Oracle/MS SQL/Sybase and genuinely FOSS,
 unlike MySql. Tasty DB goodness.

 Cheers,
 Judah

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
 
  Many people often wrongly assume that MySQL is simply FREE, which is not
  correct. Many people are also completely unaware that there is a FREE
 MSSQL
  Express edition.
  The FREE version is the community edition, which also has limitations,
 look
  them up, If you want enterprise features then you have to pay i'm 

RE: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Rick Faircloth

I've been using MySQL for over 10 years and never had any problems with it.
Get PremiumSoft's Navicat for your GUI and management is a breeze.  Never
had anything corrupted and MySQL only overloads the CPU when code is not
working correctly.

Backups can easily be automated with Navicat, as well.

I've had good experience with it and highly recommend it.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 7:14 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release


Judah,

Yes it is nice to have power, but it is rather like buying a Porshe to drive
around town at 30MPH, sure you can brag about it and tell everyone how you
could drive at 200mph if you wanted to, but really you are never going to do
it, and a more practical car is really going to do a better job for you in
that scenario.

My comments are based on my own *REAL WORLD* experience hosting hundreds of
databases over many years, rather than as a developer building a single
database/website. but in those years I have experienced the following, which
is why I will always prefer/recommend MSSQL.

MySQL databases corrupt quite easily and need to be repaired (even on
dedicated machines)
Never had a MSSQL corruption problem since MSSQL 2000
MySQL  will easily get overloaded by a single database and consume 100% CPU
requiring a restart, only experienced this on v4 so far though.
Never had that problem on MSSQL
MySQL is a PITA to backup and restore, time consuming and quirky and dumps
not always reliable.
MSSQL is simple and quick to backup/restore/migrate.
Our MSSQL servers are able to host far more databases than the MySQL
servers.

Now granted the limits on Express edition would mean you could not host HUGE
memory/CPU hogging databases, but as I said, this scenario is quite rare,
most people's databases do not come anywhere near this and the Express
edition will handle them just fine, so it certainly is not just good for
development. We ran SQL 2005 express for years in a shared hosting
environment with no problems at all, the limits did not cause any problems
for a long time. We managed to get a lot of databases on the server until it
started to run out of power, and now we use SQL Server 2008 web edition,
which is actually very cheap to run.
Again I would point out that if you are in the need of great power and
reliability, then you should be running your own server and probably not
running the free editions anyway.

The problem with databases and database servers is that most developers
really don;t know much about them, and will just throw together a basic
database and rely on the servers out of the box config. In this area MSSQL
shines, as you can install it out of the box with no tweaking and it will
run like a dream.

With MySQL on the other hand you really need a deeper understanding of how
it works to be able to fine tune its performance and you also need to
understand the different database engines it utilises and when to use them,
again something most people do not do, which adds to the
reliability/performance issues with databases.

To be honest this is somewhat of a rarity as M$ products are usually not
known for being the best, often it is the 3rd party products which are
superior, but you also have to remember that M$ did not originally create
SQL Server, it was originally Sybase. So if you are in the anti-Microsoft
camp you may find this history of SQL server interesting.

http://insidesqlserver.com/companion/History%20of%20SQL%20Server.pdf

At the end of the day this is just my opinion/experience, you do not have to
agree with it.


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:


 MySql is free though licensing is a bit complicated because of a
 dual-license model. The community edition includes many enterprise
 sorts of features like replication and partitioning. If I recall,
 there are additional backup tools and monitoring in the paid
 enterprise edition. If you want to go completely free from the weird
 Oracle ownership stuff (which I think is wise, personally), there is
 the MariaDB fork which is entirely FOSS as far as I know. What
 enterprise features are you thinking aren't in the community
 edition?

 MySql community edition has none of the limitations present in MS SQL
 Express edition. Honestly, not taking advantage of more than a gig of
 RAM or 1 cpu core is just stupid. Why would you even have a database
 server? I suppose if you are housing the db on the same machine as
 your app server then...well, you have plenty of other problems at that
 point.

 Sql Express is great for development (though I prefer developer
 edition myself). It is not meant for production websites, period.
 That's why Microsoft has a Web edition. I like SQL Server and use it
 but it is wrong to try and compare Sql Express and MySql community
 edition, they are completely different classes of software.

 That being said, I still

Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Michaels

I'm glad your experiences have been good Rich. Perhaps you can quantify the
scale, i.e how many databases over how long, i'm sure it will be more
helpful to present a bigger picture.

But do remember just as a car owner can say my car has been great, this
cannot be applied to every single owner of that same car. You have to
consider others experiences as well.
Of course not everyone has the same problems, but if hundreds of others have
had the same problems, then you cannot really ignore it.
As I said, my experience is with hundreds of customers/databases over many
years, so it is not really just my own opinion/experience, but all the
experience of all those other customers as well, I am more of a messenger
really.

The common problems and issues can be googled, like this for example.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-GB:officialclient=firefox-a

You are correct that backups can be automated, they can even be automated
with the FREE MySQLAdministrator that used to come free with mysql, but for
some bizarre reason Oracle removed this feature from the new workbench.
However the problem is in the way that backups work, it is not really a
backup, it is a DUMP from the database as one huge SQL script to drop
tables, re-create tables and re-insert data.
This causes some of the following issues on shared hosting particularly

1. many people only have access to PHPMyadmin, and the DUMP can often be
very large even for a moderate sized databases, doing large dumps simply
wont work most of the time with PHPMyadmin, whether your backing up or
restoring, it just times out or cannot cope. Often the only solution is
command line directly on the server.
2. if moving between versions importing the dump wont work sometimes and it
can be a PITA to figure out why, especially if it is a BIG database and you
have to keep re-exporting it.

The CPU overload can of course be blamed on poor code, more usually bad SQL,
but this problem exists on every platform in every language, but MSSQL does
seem to cope with bad queries much better.

HTH

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote:


 I've been using MySQL for over 10 years and never had any problems with it.
 Get PremiumSoft's Navicat for your GUI and management is a breeze.  Never
 had anything corrupted and MySQL only overloads the CPU when code is not
 working correctly.

 Backups can easily be automated with Navicat, as well.

 I've had good experience with it and highly recommend it.

 Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 7:14 AM
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release


 Judah,

 Yes it is nice to have power, but it is rather like buying a Porshe to
 drive
 around town at 30MPH, sure you can brag about it and tell everyone how you
 could drive at 200mph if you wanted to, but really you are never going to
 do
 it, and a more practical car is really going to do a better job for you in
 that scenario.

 My comments are based on my own *REAL WORLD* experience hosting hundreds of
 databases over many years, rather than as a developer building a single
 database/website. but in those years I have experienced the following,
 which
 is why I will always prefer/recommend MSSQL.

 MySQL databases corrupt quite easily and need to be repaired (even on
 dedicated machines)
 Never had a MSSQL corruption problem since MSSQL 2000
 MySQL  will easily get overloaded by a single database and consume 100% CPU
 requiring a restart, only experienced this on v4 so far though.
 Never had that problem on MSSQL
 MySQL is a PITA to backup and restore, time consuming and quirky and dumps
 not always reliable.
 MSSQL is simple and quick to backup/restore/migrate.
 Our MSSQL servers are able to host far more databases than the MySQL
 servers.

 Now granted the limits on Express edition would mean you could not host
 HUGE
 memory/CPU hogging databases, but as I said, this scenario is quite rare,
 most people's databases do not come anywhere near this and the Express
 edition will handle them just fine, so it certainly is not just good for
 development. We ran SQL 2005 express for years in a shared hosting
 environment with no problems at all, the limits did not cause any problems
 for a long time. We managed to get a lot of databases on the server until
 it
 started to run out of power, and now we use SQL Server 2008 web edition,
 which is actually very cheap to run.
 Again I would point out that if you are in the need of great power and
 reliability, then you should be running your own server and probably not
 running the free editions anyway.

 The problem with databases and database servers is that most developers
 really don;t know much about them, and will just throw together a basic
 database and rely on the servers out of the box config. In this area MSSQL
 shines, as you can

Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread James Holmes

Or like this:

http://www.google.com.au/search?sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=ms+sql+express+corrupt+tables

--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/



On 10 May 2011 22:31, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:

 The common problems and issues can be googled, like this for example.
 http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-GB:officialclient=firefox-a

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344404
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Michaels

Yes James, well done :-)

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:37 PM, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.comwrote:


 Or like this:


 http://www.google.com.au/search?sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=ms+sql+express+corrupt+tables

 --
 WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
 http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/



 On 10 May 2011 22:31, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
 
  The common problems and issues can be googled, like this for example.
 
 http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-GB:officialclient=firefox-a

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344406
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Rick Faircloth

My experience has mostly been with relatively small databases running
anywhere from 2 months to 8 years.  The most trafficked site I host
serves about 50,000 pages views per month with almost all pages serving
some database-driven dynamic content.

I usually have about 25 databases running simultaneously on the same
server with my sites.

I don't have a lot of complex code (at least not to me) running on these
servers accessing the database, so that cuts down on coding problems that
might cause MySQL to spike the CPU.  I did have more issues with that a
few years ago, and even once recently on the server, but the CPU spiking
has always been related to coding or another piece of software trying to
run cfexecute operations, etc.  I've never tracked an issue back to a
problem with MySQL.

And, I realize that every user's experience is going to be different, just
as every car driver's accident experience is different with the same make
and model, due mostly to the driver's use and driving capability.  Some
folks just have a propensity for crashing. :o)

I have no complaints with MySQL for my requirements.  It's been good to me.
I've always been a Windows Server user, fyi...

Rick

-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:31 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release


I'm glad your experiences have been good Rich. Perhaps you can quantify the
scale, i.e how many databases over how long, i'm sure it will be more
helpful to present a bigger picture.

But do remember just as a car owner can say my car has been great, this
cannot be applied to every single owner of that same car. You have to
consider others experiences as well.
Of course not everyone has the same problems, but if hundreds of others have
had the same problems, then you cannot really ignore it.
As I said, my experience is with hundreds of customers/databases over many
years, so it is not really just my own opinion/experience, but all the
experience of all those other customers as well, I am more of a messenger
really.

The common problems and issues can be googled, like this for example.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq
=trls=org.mozilla:en-GB:officialclient=firefox-a

You are correct that backups can be automated, they can even be automated
with the FREE MySQLAdministrator that used to come free with mysql, but for
some bizarre reason Oracle removed this feature from the new workbench.
However the problem is in the way that backups work, it is not really a
backup, it is a DUMP from the database as one huge SQL script to drop
tables, re-create tables and re-insert data.
This causes some of the following issues on shared hosting particularly

1. many people only have access to PHPMyadmin, and the DUMP can often be
very large even for a moderate sized databases, doing large dumps simply
wont work most of the time with PHPMyadmin, whether your backing up or
restoring, it just times out or cannot cope. Often the only solution is
command line directly on the server.
2. if moving between versions importing the dump wont work sometimes and it
can be a PITA to figure out why, especially if it is a BIG database and you
have to keep re-exporting it.

The CPU overload can of course be blamed on poor code, more usually bad SQL,
but this problem exists on every platform in every language, but MSSQL does
seem to cope with bad queries much better.

HTH

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote:


 I've been using MySQL for over 10 years and never had any problems with
it.
 Get PremiumSoft's Navicat for your GUI and management is a breeze.  Never
 had anything corrupted and MySQL only overloads the CPU when code is not
 working correctly.

 Backups can easily be automated with Navicat, as well.

 I've had good experience with it and highly recommend it.

 Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 7:14 AM
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release


 Judah,

 Yes it is nice to have power, but it is rather like buying a Porshe to
 drive
 around town at 30MPH, sure you can brag about it and tell everyone how you
 could drive at 200mph if you wanted to, but really you are never going to
 do
 it, and a more practical car is really going to do a better job for you in
 that scenario.

 My comments are based on my own *REAL WORLD* experience hosting hundreds
of
 databases over many years, rather than as a developer building a single
 database/website. but in those years I have experienced the following,
 which
 is why I will always prefer/recommend MSSQL.

 MySQL databases corrupt quite easily and need to be repaired (even on
 dedicated machines)
 Never had a MSSQL corruption problem since MSSQL 2000
 MySQL  will easily get overloaded by a single database and consume 100%
CPU

Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Michaels

Presumably all those databases were designed by you and all the code written
by you, so the lack of issues hopefully means all your code was good :-)


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote:


 My experience has mostly been with relatively small databases running
 anywhere from 2 months to 8 years.  The most trafficked site I host
 serves about 50,000 pages views per month with almost all pages serving
 some database-driven dynamic content.

 I usually have about 25 databases running simultaneously on the same
 server with my sites.

 I don't have a lot of complex code (at least not to me) running on these
 servers accessing the database, so that cuts down on coding problems that
 might cause MySQL to spike the CPU.  I did have more issues with that a
 few years ago, and even once recently on the server, but the CPU spiking
 has always been related to coding or another piece of software trying to
 run cfexecute operations, etc.  I've never tracked an issue back to a
 problem with MySQL.

 And, I realize that every user's experience is going to be different, just
 as every car driver's accident experience is different with the same make
 and model, due mostly to the driver's use and driving capability.  Some
 folks just have a propensity for crashing. :o)

 I have no complaints with MySQL for my requirements.  It's been good to me.
 I've always been a Windows Server user, fyi...

 Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:31 AM
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release


 I'm glad your experiences have been good Rich. Perhaps you can quantify the
 scale, i.e how many databases over how long, i'm sure it will be more
 helpful to present a bigger picture.

 But do remember just as a car owner can say my car has been great, this
 cannot be applied to every single owner of that same car. You have to
 consider others experiences as well.
 Of course not everyone has the same problems, but if hundreds of others
 have
 had the same problems, then you cannot really ignore it.
 As I said, my experience is with hundreds of customers/databases over many
 years, so it is not really just my own opinion/experience, but all the
 experience of all those other customers as well, I am more of a messenger
 really.

 The common problems and issues can be googled, like this for example.

 http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq
 =trls=org.mozilla:en-GB:officialclient=firefox-ahttp://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq%0A=trls=org.mozilla:en-GB:officialclient=firefox-a

 You are correct that backups can be automated, they can even be automated
 with the FREE MySQLAdministrator that used to come free with mysql, but for
 some bizarre reason Oracle removed this feature from the new workbench.
 However the problem is in the way that backups work, it is not really a
 backup, it is a DUMP from the database as one huge SQL script to drop
 tables, re-create tables and re-insert data.
 This causes some of the following issues on shared hosting particularly

 1. many people only have access to PHPMyadmin, and the DUMP can often be
 very large even for a moderate sized databases, doing large dumps simply
 wont work most of the time with PHPMyadmin, whether your backing up or
 restoring, it just times out or cannot cope. Often the only solution is
 command line directly on the server.
 2. if moving between versions importing the dump wont work sometimes and it
 can be a PITA to figure out why, especially if it is a BIG database and you
 have to keep re-exporting it.

 The CPU overload can of course be blamed on poor code, more usually bad
 SQL,
 but this problem exists on every platform in every language, but MSSQL does
 seem to cope with bad queries much better.

 HTH

 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Rick Faircloth
 r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote:

 
  I've been using MySQL for over 10 years and never had any problems with
 it.
  Get PremiumSoft's Navicat for your GUI and management is a breeze.  Never
  had anything corrupted and MySQL only overloads the CPU when code is not
  working correctly.
 
  Backups can easily be automated with Navicat, as well.
 
  I've had good experience with it and highly recommend it.
 
  Rick
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 7:14 AM
  To: cf-talk
  Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release
 
 
  Judah,
 
  Yes it is nice to have power, but it is rather like buying a Porshe to
  drive
  around town at 30MPH, sure you can brag about it and tell everyone how
 you
  could drive at 200mph if you wanted to, but really you are never going to
  do
  it, and a more practical car is really going to do a better job for you
 in
  that scenario.
 
  My comments are based on my own *REAL WORLD

RE: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Rick Faircloth

All true...  now as far as all your code was good... I don't know
about that, but it gets the job done. :o)

-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:26 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release


Presumably all those databases were designed by you and all the code written
by you, so the lack of issues hopefully means all your code was good :-)


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote:


 My experience has mostly been with relatively small databases running
 anywhere from 2 months to 8 years.  The most trafficked site I host
 serves about 50,000 pages views per month with almost all pages serving
 some database-driven dynamic content.

 I usually have about 25 databases running simultaneously on the same
 server with my sites.

 I don't have a lot of complex code (at least not to me) running on these
 servers accessing the database, so that cuts down on coding problems that
 might cause MySQL to spike the CPU.  I did have more issues with that a
 few years ago, and even once recently on the server, but the CPU spiking
 has always been related to coding or another piece of software trying to
 run cfexecute operations, etc.  I've never tracked an issue back to a
 problem with MySQL.

 And, I realize that every user's experience is going to be different, just
 as every car driver's accident experience is different with the same make
 and model, due mostly to the driver's use and driving capability.  Some
 folks just have a propensity for crashing. :o)

 I have no complaints with MySQL for my requirements.  It's been good to
me.
 I've always been a Windows Server user, fyi...

 Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:31 AM
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release


 I'm glad your experiences have been good Rich. Perhaps you can quantify
the
 scale, i.e how many databases over how long, i'm sure it will be more
 helpful to present a bigger picture.

 But do remember just as a car owner can say my car has been great, this
 cannot be applied to every single owner of that same car. You have to
 consider others experiences as well.
 Of course not everyone has the same problems, but if hundreds of others
 have
 had the same problems, then you cannot really ignore it.
 As I said, my experience is with hundreds of customers/databases over many
 years, so it is not really just my own opinion/experience, but all the
 experience of all those other customers as well, I am more of a messenger
 really.

 The common problems and issues can be googled, like this for example.


http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq

=trls=org.mozilla:en-GB:officialclient=firefox-ahttp://www.google.co.uk/s
earch?q=mysql+corrupted+tablesie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq%0A=trls=org.mozilla:en-
GB:officialclient=firefox-a

 You are correct that backups can be automated, they can even be automated
 with the FREE MySQLAdministrator that used to come free with mysql, but
for
 some bizarre reason Oracle removed this feature from the new workbench.
 However the problem is in the way that backups work, it is not really a
 backup, it is a DUMP from the database as one huge SQL script to drop
 tables, re-create tables and re-insert data.
 This causes some of the following issues on shared hosting particularly

 1. many people only have access to PHPMyadmin, and the DUMP can often be
 very large even for a moderate sized databases, doing large dumps simply
 wont work most of the time with PHPMyadmin, whether your backing up or
 restoring, it just times out or cannot cope. Often the only solution is
 command line directly on the server.
 2. if moving between versions importing the dump wont work sometimes and
it
 can be a PITA to figure out why, especially if it is a BIG database and
you
 have to keep re-exporting it.

 The CPU overload can of course be blamed on poor code, more usually bad
 SQL,
 but this problem exists on every platform in every language, but MSSQL
does
 seem to cope with bad queries much better.

 HTH

 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Rick Faircloth
 r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote:

 
  I've been using MySQL for over 10 years and never had any problems with
 it.
  Get PremiumSoft's Navicat for your GUI and management is a breeze.
Never
  had anything corrupted and MySQL only overloads the CPU when code is not
  working correctly.
 
  Backups can easily be automated with Navicat, as well.
 
  I've had good experience with it and highly recommend it.
 
  Rick
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 7:14 AM
  To: cf-talk
  Subject: Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release
 
 
  Judah,
 
  Yes it is nice to have power, but it is rather like buying a Porshe

Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Scott Weikert

Re: good code:

I've done this once (and am about to do it again) so I'll share a few 
bits that I learned re: code changes:

99% of my code was fine. But I had to adjust some syntax.

MSSQL vs MySQL:

LEN needs to be LENGTH
CHARINDEX needs to be LOCATE

There probably are more differences like that but those are the two I 
bumped into.

There's also the aforemented timestamp data type. If you use a 
datetime or timestamp field with getdate() as the default, you'll 
need to switch it to a timestamp field with a current_timestamp default.

Queries are also case sensitive so make sure your column names (and, 
IIRC, table names) match up.

I also had issues with how certain joins worked - I don't recall exactly 
what these issues were so I won't speculate. I just recall having to 
rewrite some queries to get them to function properly.

--Scott



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344414
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Jordan Michaels

It honestly wasn't my intention to start any sort of flame war. I 
truthfully did find the comment humorous.

It was like stating that this 2oz kitten is more powerful then this 
T-Rex over here. I had to laugh.

Maybe the kitten has super-robot ninja powers?

Honestly, it sounds to me like you're basing your more powerful 
comments off of some bad experiences you had with MySQL. I respect that, 
but I wouldn't call a very clearly hobbled DB engine more powerful 
then an enterprise class DB engine because of it. Maybe you were 
thinking of MS SQL Server in a more general term then MS SQL Express?

-Jordan

On 05/09/2011 04:20 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:

 Perhaps you tried to run MSSQL on linux Jordan, that would certainly
 be humorous I imagine :-)


 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Gerald Guidogerald.gu...@gmail.comwrote:


 Russ Michaels wrote:

 don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql


 Jordan Michaelsjor...@viviotech.net  wrote:

 I find the more powerful comment humorous.

 This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want some?

 G!

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaelsjor...@viviotech.net
 wrote:


 I find the more powerful comment humorous.

 SQL Express limits are here:
 http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx

 Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:


 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html

 I've done it several times with no issues.

 -Jordan

 On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:

 don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
 mysql
 community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your
 also
 moving to Linux.
 There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do
 it
 for
 you.

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
 jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk   wrote:


 I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.

 Many thanks,

 Jenny
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date:
 05/08/11
 19:34:00











 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344416
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Russ Michaels

lol, of course not :-)
We will have to agree to disagree.

I will stick with my super ninja bionic kitten, you stick with your
extinct Jurassic fossil :-)

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.netwrote:


 It honestly wasn't my intention to start any sort of flame war. I
 truthfully did find the comment humorous.

 It was like stating that this 2oz kitten is more powerful then this
 T-Rex over here. I had to laugh.

 Maybe the kitten has super-robot ninja powers?

 Honestly, it sounds to me like you're basing your more powerful
 comments off of some bad experiences you had with MySQL. I respect that,
 but I wouldn't call a very clearly hobbled DB engine more powerful
 then an enterprise class DB engine because of it. Maybe you were
 thinking of MS SQL Server in a more general term then MS SQL Express?

 -Jordan

 On 05/09/2011 04:20 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
 
  Perhaps you tried to run MSSQL on linux Jordan, that would certainly
  be humorous I imagine :-)
 
 
  On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Gerald Guidogerald.gu...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
  Russ Michaels wrote:
 
  don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
 mysql
 
 
  Jordan Michaelsjor...@viviotech.net  wrote:
 
  I find the more powerful comment humorous.
 
  This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want
 some?
 
  G!
 
  On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaelsjor...@viviotech.net
  wrote:
 
 
  I find the more powerful comment humorous.
 
  SQL Express limits are here:
  http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
 
  Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:
 
 
 
 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html
 
  I've done it several times with no issues.
 
  -Jordan
 
  On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
 
  don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
  mysql
  community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your
  also
  moving to Linux.
  There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do
  it
  for
  you.
 
  On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
  jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk   wrote:
 
 
  I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.
 
  Many thanks,
 
  Jenny
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date:
  05/08/11
  19:34:00
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344422
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread James Holmes

You could always both swap to a real database:

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/express-edition/overview/index.html

:-O

--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/



On 11 May 2011 08:51, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:

 lol, of course not :-)
 We will have to agree to disagree.

 I will stick with my super ninja bionic kitten, you stick with your
 extinct Jurassic fossil :-)

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344423
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Maureen

They are all real databases.  The majority of  the problems that
website databases have are caused by badly written code, inefficient
queries and poor performance tuning, and have nothing to do with the
database platform.

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.com wrote:

 You could always both swap to a real database:

 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/express-edition/overview/index.html

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344428
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-10 Thread Dave Watts

 You could always both swap to a real database:

 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/express-edition/overview/index.html

Your DB2 link is broken.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite.

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344434
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Russ Michaels

don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql
community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your also
moving to Linux.
There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do it for
you.

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear 
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:


 I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.

 Many thanks,

 Jenny
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date: 05/08/11
 19:34:00



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344365
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Jordan Michaels

I find the more powerful comment humorous.

SQL Express limits are here:
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx

Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html

I've done it several times with no issues.

-Jordan

On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:

 don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql
 community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your also
 moving to Linux.
 There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do it for
 you.

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
 jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk  wrote:


 I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.

 Many thanks,

 Jenny
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date: 05/08/11
 19:34:00





 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344366
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Gerald Guido

  Russ Michaels wrote:

 don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql


Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net wrote:

 I find the more powerful comment humorous.

This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want some?

G!

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.netwrote:


 I find the more powerful comment humorous.

 SQL Express limits are here:
 http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx

 Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:

 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html

 I've done it several times with no issues.

 -Jordan

 On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
 
  don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql
  community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your
 also
  moving to Linux.
  There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do it
 for
  you.
 
  On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
  jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk  wrote:
 
 
  I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.
 
  Many thanks,
 
  Jenny
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date: 05/08/11
  19:34:00
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344368
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Russ Michaels

Perhaps you tried to run MSSQL on linux Jordan, that would certainly
be humorous I imagine :-)


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.comwrote:


   Russ Michaels wrote:
 
  don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql


 Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net wrote:

  I find the more powerful comment humorous.

 This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want some?

 G!

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net
 wrote:

 
  I find the more powerful comment humorous.
 
  SQL Express limits are here:
  http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
 
  Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:
 
 
 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html
 
  I've done it several times with no issues.
 
  -Jordan
 
  On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
  
   don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
 mysql
   community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your
  also
   moving to Linux.
   There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do
 it
  for
   you.
  
   On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
   jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk  wrote:
  
  
   I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.
  
   Many thanks,
  
   Jenny
   No virus found in this outgoing message.
   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
   Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date:
 05/08/11
   19:34:00
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344370
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Judah McAuley

Well, it is pretty damn funny.

I've migrated from MS SQL to MySql before and it generally isn't too
bad. There are various migration tools available, I like the ones from
Red Gate. MySql has some funkiness that comes into play if you want to
combine foreign keys and full text indexing from what I recall, though
that may have gone away in more recent versions. There are also data
type differences that you might want to take a look at, like you would
think that timestamp (in mysql) would be a datetime type but it isn't,
so be sure to read up on them and you should be fine.

If you are still looking at options, you might also want to look at
PostGres. PostGres is a solidly enterprise-level db (hot swap backup,
all sorts of replication options, partitioning, etc), is free, truly
open source and doesn't have the strangeness that comes along with
MySql being governed by Oracle. It's good stuff.

Cheers,
Judah

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.com wrote:

   Russ Michaels wrote:

 don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql


Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net wrote:

 I find the more powerful comment humorous.

 This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want some?

 G!

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.netwrote:


 I find the more powerful comment humorous.

 SQL Express limits are here:
 http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx

 Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:

 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html

 I've done it several times with no issues.

 -Jordan

 On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
 
  don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql
  community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your
 also
  moving to Linux.
  There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do it
 for
  you.
 
  On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
  jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk  wrote:
 
 
  I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.
 
  Many thanks,
 
  Jenny
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date: 05/08/11
  19:34:00
 
 
 
 
 
 



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344373
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Judah McAuley

Or possibly Jordan has needed a database that runs on more than 1 CPU,
uses more than 1GB of RAM or has a db size of more than 10GB :)


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:

 Perhaps you tried to run MSSQL on linux Jordan, that would certainly
 be humorous I imagine :-)


 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.comwrote:


   Russ Michaels wrote:
 
  don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than mysql


 Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net wrote:

  I find the more powerful comment humorous.

 This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want some?

 G!

 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net
 wrote:

 
  I find the more powerful comment humorous.
 
  SQL Express limits are here:
  http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
 
  Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:
 
 
 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html
 
  I've done it several times with no issues.
 
  -Jordan
 
  On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
  
   don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
 mysql
   community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless your
  also
   moving to Linux.
   There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will do
 it
  for
   you.
  
   On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
   jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk  wrote:
  
  
   I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises, etc.
  
   Many thanks,
  
   Jenny
   No virus found in this outgoing message.
   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
   Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date:
 05/08/11
   19:34:00
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344374
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Russ Michaels

Many people often wrongly assume that MySQL is simply FREE, which is not
correct. Many people are also completely unaware that there is a FREE MSSQL
Express edition.
The FREE version is the community edition, which also has limitations, look
them up, If you want enterprise features then you have to pay i'm afraid,
even with MySQL.
The FREE editions of both will meet most peoples needs even with their
limitations, it is really not very common to have databases of 10GB that
needs more than 1GB RAM or more than 1CPU, then you probably be using the
FREE editions anyway.



On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:


 Or possibly Jordan has needed a database that runs on more than 1 CPU,
 uses more than 1GB of RAM or has a db size of more than 10GB :)


 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
 
  Perhaps you tried to run MSSQL on linux Jordan, that would certainly
  be humorous I imagine :-)
 
 
  On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
Russ Michaels wrote:
  
   don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
 mysql
 
 
  Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net wrote:
 
   I find the more powerful comment humorous.
 
  This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want
 some?
 
  G!
 
  On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net
  wrote:
 
  
   I find the more powerful comment humorous.
  
   SQL Express limits are here:
   http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
  
   Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:
  
  
 
 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html
  
   I've done it several times with no issues.
  
   -Jordan
  
   On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
   
don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
  mysql
community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless
 your
   also
moving to Linux.
There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will
 do
  it
   for
you.
   
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk  wrote:
   
   
I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises,
 etc.
   
Many thanks,
   
Jenny
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date:
  05/08/11
19:34:00
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
 
 
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344377
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Migrating a DB from MS SQL 2000 into MySQL latest release

2011-05-09 Thread Judah McAuley

MySql is free though licensing is a bit complicated because of a
dual-license model. The community edition includes many enterprise
sorts of features like replication and partitioning. If I recall,
there are additional backup tools and monitoring in the paid
enterprise edition. If you want to go completely free from the weird
Oracle ownership stuff (which I think is wise, personally), there is
the MariaDB fork which is entirely FOSS as far as I know. What
enterprise features are you thinking aren't in the community
edition?

MySql community edition has none of the limitations present in MS SQL
Express edition. Honestly, not taking advantage of more than a gig of
RAM or 1 cpu core is just stupid. Why would you even have a database
server? I suppose if you are housing the db on the same machine as
your app server then...well, you have plenty of other problems at that
point.

Sql Express is great for development (though I prefer developer
edition myself). It is not meant for production websites, period.
That's why Microsoft has a Web edition. I like SQL Server and use it
but it is wrong to try and compare Sql Express and MySql community
edition, they are completely different classes of software.

That being said, I still think people should check out PostGres. A
feature set comparable to Oracle/MS SQL/Sybase and genuinely FOSS,
unlike MySql. Tasty DB goodness.

Cheers,
Judah

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:

 Many people often wrongly assume that MySQL is simply FREE, which is not
 correct. Many people are also completely unaware that there is a FREE MSSQL
 Express edition.
 The FREE version is the community edition, which also has limitations, look
 them up, If you want enterprise features then you have to pay i'm afraid,
 even with MySQL.
 The FREE editions of both will meet most peoples needs even with their
 limitations, it is really not very common to have databases of 10GB that
 needs more than 1GB RAM or more than 1CPU, then you probably be using the
 FREE editions anyway.



 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.comwrote:


 Or possibly Jordan has needed a database that runs on more than 1 CPU,
 uses more than 1GB of RAM or has a db size of more than 10GB :)


 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
 
  Perhaps you tried to run MSSQL on linux Jordan, that would certainly
  be humorous I imagine :-)
 
 
  On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
    Russ Michaels wrote:
  
   don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
 mysql
 
 
  Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net wrote:
 
   I find the more powerful comment humorous.
 
  This should be fun to watch :) I am making some popcorn. Anyone want
 some?
 
  G!
 
  On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Jordan Michaels jor...@viviotech.net
  wrote:
 
  
   I find the more powerful comment humorous.
  
   SQL Express limits are here:
   http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
  
   Migration from MS SQL to MySQL documentation is here:
  
  
 
 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/migration-toolkit/en/mysql-migration-toolkit-indepth-sourcedb-mssql.html
  
   I've done it several times with no issues.
  
   -Jordan
  
   On 05/09/2011 03:38 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
   
don't forget that MSSQL express is also free and more powerful than
  mysql
community edition so there is no need to migrate to MySQL unless
 your
   also
moving to Linux.
There are however free migration tools on the mysql site that will
 do
  it
   for
you.
   
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Jenny Gavin-Wear
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk  wrote:
   
   
I'm interested in any info.  Pit falls to avoid, best practises,
 etc.
   
Many thanks,
   
Jenny
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.900 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3625 - Release Date:
  05/08/11
19:34:00
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
 
 
 
 



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:344388
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm