[cia-drugs] Omits
Yes, Mark, that's the story, Idaho Observer 200704, Skorzeny according to Berman. As I was reading that, with its emphasis on Jesuits, I think I remember that Chip McBride emphasizes the zionist Jews to the exclusion of Jesuits. Then I wondered if maybe Sean B wasn't Boston Irish, and thus highly likely Roman Catholic, maybe even Jesuit educated. Chip and Sean both live in a Boston suburb and both work in Cambridge. Maybe they are both Boston Irish and omit Jesuits from their expozays. Read the Gary North piece on New Mercantilism, where instead of aiming to accumulate gold, or US dollars, foreign banks(or surrogate funds) accumulate US equities, and China may also buy long commodity contracts. That's a Yellow Peril thing, but omitted is that foreign treasuries started buying equity in the form of REITs back in the last century, a decade ago. What about REITs now, with the decline in US real estate value? You have to at least mention REITs. Some small countries base their currency on US REITs. Carlyle Group reportedly advises its investors that they are hovering like vultures to pounce on undervalued US real estate after that is tanked by rising interest rates. North would blame China for any rise in US interest rates, covering the Carlyle vultures, who always escape Nuremburgs, unless this Skorzeny thing turns out well. When my brother visited Windsor Castle, they told him we are related to the Bush family. Now Skorzeny tells us that the Bush family are social climbers without pedigress, other than that of Aleister Crowley. Does that mean I get to be president? Oh, we don't have presidents anymore, sorry. Another omission in the Tillman execution story is the obvious conclusion that if Jessica Lynch's nurses tried to return her to American lines, that the Iraqis followed the Geneva Convention in treating her well and trying to return her, not even exchange her. Rajiv Chandrasekaran, Washington Post reporter and author, has written that the US occupation did not at any point re-supply or reinforce staff of Iraqi hospitals looted during the US invasion, so that they continually smelled like corpses and feces during the entire US formal occupation. And other mainstream news outlets reported that US forces shot a female ambulance driver in Faluja, destroyed ambulances, and seized hospitals in Faluja and Hit, because they followed the Geneva Convention and treated enemy combatants like Pvt. Jessica Lynch. Bush does quack like a nazi, doesn't he? And then three bullets from Goebbels' Luger to the forehead of Pat Tillman? There must be some refugees from Nuremburg around here, maybe in Floridistan.
[cia-drugs] Re: The picture of 9-11 is coming together.
I have several hours of DC local TV videotaped from 9/11/2001. There was a pull it moment. Taken separately from NYC, it is a very plausible Pull It moment, in which the fire department tells a TV reporter that something is about to happen, the reporter tells us he will be back as soon as his crew gets ready, then the camera zooms in very close to the top of the Pentagon wall, and at that exact location the wall cracks and the whole wall falls down. What makes that a suspicious event is when we ask by what means the wall was brought down, by demolition charges? If so, when placed, and who was prepared to do so on short notice? Some people wonder why no effort was made from the crash until the demolition to rescue survivors(not necessarily from the plane but could have been a few Ron Browns too) from the crash area, and how did that kerosene get lit on fire anyway? No burn victims were taken to the well prepared burn unit at George Washington Hospital Center. If a demolition team was present with fire suits to go in and place charges, why was there no platoon of fire-suited rescuers searching the hole area before that? Why was the Fort Myers fire truck and crew waiting at the site of the hole before the plane crashed? Then there was the drill at CIA/NRO next to Dulles airport when one of the planes took off. And there was supposedly a drill going on in the air, too. More gaming that served a very real function but on the wrong side. And how about game spectators? What possible reason could there be for Warren Buffett to be at Offut AFB, and General Mahmud Amad with Porter Goss in DC, if not to have the best seats to watch the game? --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, norgesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Vicky Davis ../../../../post?postID=rFQR3f38CB060RAUfX18oAjY31_oEEOc8PCYDmqUTtiVJWI\ e_LDcTZ8lTxI_qQIspL-OAymTYMfMO5PXkwSent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 2:16 PM Subject: Final Piece - tying it together After watching these videos, I think I see the whole picture now: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5elUcG8zMQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5elUcG8zMQ Full Spectrum Treason -- The Objective force Future Combat Systems -- The UP and UP http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLROLbkfc5o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLROLbkfc5o Forgive the hastily prepared webpage but I didn't want to take the time to make it nice. http://www.channelingreality.com/September...ept_11_coup.htm http://www.channelingreality.com/September...ept_11_coup.htm Add to the above - more succinctly stated: The key concepts in the documents are shared situational awareness and ubiquitous computing which - if I understand it - is just an obscure way of saying that 'all the world's a stage' for the war games. It's taking the gaming environment and integrating it into the 'real world' of the game players for 'shared situational awareness'. Both of those things would explain why the Port Authority reported - something before it actually happened (one of the towers or WTC 7.. I can't quite remember) and why the BBC reported the collapse WTC 7 before it happened. With the military link into the broadcasting network, it wouldn't have been difficult to inject images as well as information into their news gathering portals. Then with shill supplied supporting videos following the event, they (thought they) could control the knowledge flow. Vicky Davis- The Final Piece of the 9/11 PuzzleThe picture of 9-11 is coming together. FEMA - DARPA - Naval War College in Rhode Island (War Games) Naval War College in Rhode Island plans the war games - but they are not games. They are terrorist attacks against the people of the United States - and I suspect other countries. Recall the Sarin (sp) gas attack in Tokyo? After that - using the same pitch line as with NYC, Toyko built a Command and Control communications center in preparation for a terrorist event. The trick is that the Command and Control communications center becomes the hub for directing local governments from the central control point. The Central control point is managing both sides - the Special Forces terrorists conducting effects-based operations. Local officials are instructed what to do to prevent terrorist attacks - if they don't do it, then an attack occurs. DARPA - networked computer systems for national security On Sept. 11, Adm. John Poindexter was in charge of DARPA. TIA was ready to plug in. FEMA - Disasters - training of local officials, implementer of the DARPA computer systems Art Cebrowski - father of net-centric warfare taught there. Thomas Barnett - 1998 - Planning a revolution http://www.channelingreality.com/The_Coup/Barnett_Intro.htm Coup d'etat minus 10 years http://www.channelingreality.com/The_Coup/cday_minus_10.htm Philip Zelikow, John Deutch and Ashton Carter - Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/visions/publication/terrorism.htm#About%20Vi\ sions%20of%20GovernanceThe
[cia-drugs] Re: Final Piece - tying it together
Also with Hurricane Katrina, two oil drums were lit on fire with incendiaries just before Bush flew past. And that was four days after Bush ought to have had his USAF team set up landing lights and radar on the concrete runway as soon as the wind died down. Instead Bush waited until after US commercial airplanes got tired of waiting the best part of a week for the cruel flaccid slug and landed on the undamaged runway of the international airport, far from flooding. Then the image team which had previously made a posterboy of Pat Tillman, then executed a recanting Tillman, made a postergirl of Jessica Lynch, then made sure Iraqi hospitals do not treat enemy combatants like Lynch, and needless to say the Iraq WMD and Iraq 911 liars, lit up two oil drums to make smoke and then shouted looters! as if to justify Bush sending 40,000 troops for 5000 remaining citizens(looters). There would have been no crowds of thousands of people clustering at the stadium and the convention center if Bush had opened the airport using the same USAF team but four days earlier, and if Bush had made FEMA bring buses to New Orleans and back to Baton Rouge and beyond. Bush could have closed the MRGO canal gate, too. But a gaming we must go. --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, norgesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the webpage: http://www.channelingreality.com/September_11/War_Games/Sept_11_coup.htm http://www.channelingreality.com/September_11/War_Games/Sept_11_coup.ht\ m
[cia-drugs] Re: The Cold War Between Washington and Tehran by Noam Chomsky
In the West, any wild statement of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, immediately gets circulated in headlines, dubiously translated. But as is well known, Ahmadinejad has no control over foreign policy, which is in the hands of his superior, the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The U.S. media tend to ignore Khamenei's statements, especially if they are conciliatory. If the Chimp would just shut up, the Iranian people would throw Ahmadinejab out. He has failed to refine enough gasoline to serve the needs of Iranians, and they are really worked up about that. Don't give them a bogeyman, Chimp. Saddam Hussein, CIA puppet, would have been gone during the 1990's if not for the Clintons' sanctions, which killed more than a million Iraqi civilians, enough to present a bogeyman strawman to convince the Iraqis to keep Saddam as emblem of their displeasure with US sanctions. But the Merchants of Death Bureau knows what they are doing. -Bob --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Vigilius Haufniensis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/the-cold-war-between-wash\ ington-and-tehran-by-noam-chomsky/ Sunday, July 29th, 2007...5:43 am The Cold War Between Washington and Tehran by Noam Chomsky Jump to Comments Dandelion Salad by Noam Chomsky Common Dreams Published on Saturday, July 28, 2007 by Zmag.org The following is an excerpt from Noam Chomsky's new book Interventions published by City Lights Books. In the energy-rich Middle East, only two countries have failed to subordinate themselves to Washington's basic demands: Iran and Syria. Accordingly both are enemies, Iran by far the more important. As was the norm during the Cold War, resort to violence is regularly justified as a reaction to the malign influence of the main enemy, often on the flimsiest of pretexts. Unsurprisingly, as Bush sends more troops to Iraq, tales surface of Iranian interference in the internal affairs of Iraq-a country otherwise free from any foreign interference, on the tacit assumption that Washington rules the world. In the Cold War-like mentality that prevails in Washington, Tehran is portrayed as the pinnacle in the so-called Shiite Crescent that stretches from Iran to Hezbollah in Lebanon, through Shiite southern Iraq and Syria. And again unsurprisingly, the surge in Iraq and escalation of threats and accusations against Iran is accompanied by grudging willingness to attend a conference of regional powers, with the agenda limited to Iraq-more narrowly, to attaining U.S. goals in Iraq. Presumably this minimal gesture toward diplomacy is intended to allay the growing fears and anger elicited by Washington's heightened aggressiveness, with forces deployed in position to attack Iran and regular provocations and threats. For the United States, the primary issue in the Middle East has been and remains effective control of its unparalleled energy resources. Access is a secondary matter. Once the oil is on the seas it goes anywhere. Control is understood to be an instrument of global dominance. Iranian influence in the crescent challenges U.S. control. By an accident of geography, the world's major oil resources are in largely Shiite areas of the Middle East: southern Iraq, adjacent regions of Saudi Arabia and Iran, with some of the major reserves of natural gas as well. Washington's worst nightmare would be a loose Shiite alliance controlling most of the world's oil and independent of the United States. Such a bloc, if it emerges, might even join the Asian Energy Security Grid and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), based in China. Iran, which already had observer status, is to be admitted as a member of the SCO. The Hong Kong South China Morning Post reported in June 2006 that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stole the limelight at the annual meeting of the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation (SCO) by calling on the group to unite against other countries as his nation faces criticism over its nuclear programme. The non-aligned movement meanwhile affirmed Iran's inalienable right to pursue these programs, and the SCO (which includes the states of Central Asia) called on the United States to set a deadline for the withdrawal of military installations from all member states.1 If the Bush planners bring that about, they will have seriously undermined the U.S. position of power in the world. To Washington, Tehran's principal offense has been its defiance, going back to the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 and the hostage crisis at the U.S. embassy. The grim U.S. role in Iran in earlier years is excised from history. In retribution for Iranian defiance, Washington quickly turned to support for Saddam Hussein's aggression against Iran, which left hundreds of thousands dead and the country in ruins. Then came murderous sanctions, and under Bush, rejection of Iranian diplomatic efforts in favor of increasing threats of direct attack. Last July (2006), Israel invaded
[cia-drugs] Corporate America: Freedom's Greatest Threat
Corporate America: Freedom's Greatest Threat by Chuck Baldwin July 27, 2007 Most of us who believe in the free enterprise system have been taught that business interests normally work to the betterment of America's overall health, both commercially and politically. While there might have been a time when this was true, it is definitely not true today. Not only has Big Business become unfriendly to the principles of freedom, it has also become freedom's greatest threat. To say that Corporate America is America's greatest threat is a harsh accusation, but one that I believe is warranted. I will even be so bold as to say that freedom has much more to fear from today's Chambers of Commerce than it does from Al Qaida. Today's Americans need to carefully heed the sage counsel of Thomas Jefferson, who said, Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. The truth of that statement aptly explains the serious damage that Big Business is currently inflicting upon our liberties. Someone rightly observed that one can determine the focus of, and influence upon, societies by analyzing its architecture. For example, from the founding of Jamestown in 1607 through the beginning of the War for Southern Independence, the most notable buildings (in most communities) belonged to churches. From the mid-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century, the most prominent buildings belonged to various governments. From the mid-twentieth century to the present, the biggest, most lavish, and most notable buildings belong to Big Business. This is not accidental or coincidental. These buildings are the monuments of men to the ideas that mean the most to them. Accordingly, a vast number of today's Americans have come to worship at the shrine of Big Business. However, this idolatry comes at great price. Not the least of which is the way we have allowed Big Business interests to virtually control governmental policy, including our war and defense policies. For example, I recently obtained a copy of the U.S. Navy's Playbook. This Playbook succinctly summarizes the Department of the Navy's policies and guidelines, and is made available to naval officers and to public affairs professionals. Under the section entitled Vision it states, Americans secure at home and abroad; sea and air lanes open and free for the peaceful and productive movement of international commerce; enduring national and international naval relationships that remain strong and true; steadily deepening cooperation among the maritime forces of emerging partner nations . . . Notice the emphasis of international commerce, international naval relations, and emerging partner nations. Under the section entitled Focus On Execution it states, We must continue to embrace the vital contributions that out [sic] partners make in working to secure the global community. Notice that part of our Navy's policy is to secure the global community. So, who is our military charged to defend? Is it the American people? Is it the global community, or is it Big Business? Navy brass might answer, All of the above. However, it should seem obvious to anyone who is paying attention that in the grand scheme of things, the will and interests of the American people are being submerged under the will and interests of Big Business, which is creating the global community. Under the section Maritime Strategy it states, This new Maritime Strategy is required to face the threats of our interdependent societies and global economy. Can the reader not see how that even our military and defense departments are being coerced and manipulated by the interests of Big Business? Need more evidence? Look at Iraq. Are you aware that America has almost as many civilian contractors in Iraq as we do military personnel? According to a recent census report, there are more than 100,000 civilian contractors currently working in Iraq. In fact, the war in Iraq has become the most privatized war in U.S. history. (Source: Multinational Monitor, Nov/Dec 2006) The Halliburton company alone has received some $20 billion from both its oil and troop logistics contracts. Contracts, that according to MM, include [f]orty-five dollar cases of soda; $85,000 trucks in need of minor repairs . . . tens of millions of dollars in gasoline surcharges; thousands of meals prepared but never served to the troops . . . [and] contaminated water served to the troops. And if one were to actually believe that America has any intention of pulling out of Iraq, consider this: experts predict that private, civilian contracts will grow into a $200 billion-a-year global business by 2010. Why do you think that our government is currently constructing the biggest U.S. embassy in the world in downtown Baghdad? In fact, when our embassy in Iraq is finished it will be larger than the Vatican!
[cia-drugs] Re: The picture of 9-11 is coming together.
Here in Venezuela we have always known it was the USA that dumped those towers- perhaps because an in-law had worked with the CIA during the times of most corruption here? Of course, the CIA hates Chavez because it can't apply its I-do-whatever-I-want rules with Hugo. Remember that president Bush now uses only HUGO BOSS perfume... The USA came to a close when Quakers stopped controlling the government. Vanessa Di Domenico Maracaibo, Venezuela Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/
[cia-drugs] An Immoral Philosophy: PAUL KRUGMAN; Apocalypse Here
An Immoral Philosophy: PAUL KRUGMAN; Apocalypse Here by PAUL KRUGMAN - THE NEW YORK TIMES Monday Jul 30th, 2007 6:52 AM KRUGMAN: What kind of philosophy says that its O.K. to subsidize insurance companies, but not to provide health care to children? THE COMPLETE ARTICLE AND MORE -- Health Care An Immoral Philosophy By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: July 30, 2007 When a child is enrolled in the State Childrens Health Insurance Program (Schip), the positive results can be dramatic. For example, after asthmatic children are enrolled in Schip, the frequency of their attacks declines on average by 60 percent, and their likelihood of being hospitalized for the condition declines more than 70 percent. Regular care, in other words, makes a big difference. Thats why Congressional Democrats, with support from many Republicans, are trying to expand Schip, which already provides essential medical care to millions of children, to cover millions of additional children who would otherwise lack health insurance. But President Bush says that access to care is no problem After all, you just go to an emergency room and, with the support of the Republican Congressional leadership, hes declared that hell veto any Schip expansion on philosophical grounds. It must be about philosophy, because it surely isnt about cost. One of the plans Mr. Bush opposes, the one approved by an overwhelming bipartisan majority in the Senate Finance Committee, would cost less over the next five years than well spend in Iraq in the next four months. --MORE-- http://mparent-2.blogspot.com/2007/07/immoral-philosophy-paul-krugman-health.html Posted by CRIMES AND CORRUPTION OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS mparent Marc Parent CCNWON Labels: Bush Children Health Insurance, Health Care, Health insurance, Insurance, kids, New York Times, News, PAUL KRUGMAN, Politics Who Really Took Over During That Colonoscopy: FRANK RICH - President Petraeus http://mparent-2.blogspot.com/2007/07/who-really-took-over-during-that_30.html The Voters Speak: Baaa!: NICHOLAS KRISTOF http://mparent-2.blogspot.com/2007/07/voters-speak-baaa-nicholas-kristof.html Apocalypse here http://mparent-2.blogspot.com/2007/07/apocalypse-here.html CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWSWIRE- JULY 29, 2007 http://mparent-2.blogspot.com/2007/07/crimes-and-corruptions-of-new-world_30.html AND MORE http://mparent-2.blogspot.com/ http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/38 - Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail
[cia-drugs] Re: Omits
Bob, I just can't get it out of my head that GHWB was a teenage pilot in WWII who came back from the war to attend Yale. (where did the Tesla angle enter? When did he have time to secretary for tesla?) It seems odd that in a world where the reigns of power appear to be firmly in the hands of men who follow the NEOCON perspective, that nazis, neonazis and fascists are getting all the attention. I remember that Bush's family was british and had to leave england right around the time of the failed gunpowder plot. I think the name was Pierce, though that might be the Barbara Bush side of the ledger. I think the Skorzeny story is pretty far out there. I put it up there along with Tom Flocco's revelations about Bush and Cheney getting Indicted by Fitzgerald. A person could look at the world through Mae Brussel's eyes and see a nazi behind every plot. I just do not think it is so. --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, muckblit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, Mark, that's the story, Idaho Observer 200704, Skorzeny according to Berman. As I was reading that, with its emphasis on Jesuits, I think I remember that Chip McBride emphasizes the zionist Jews to the exclusion of Jesuits. Then I wondered if maybe Sean B wasn't Boston Irish, and thus highly likely Roman Catholic, maybe even Jesuit educated. Chip and Sean both live in a Boston suburb and both work in Cambridge. Maybe they are both Boston Irish and omit Jesuits from their expozays. Read the Gary North piece on New Mercantilism, where instead of aiming to accumulate gold, or US dollars, foreign banks(or surrogate funds) accumulate US equities, and China may also buy long commodity contracts. That's a Yellow Peril thing, but omitted is that foreign treasuries started buying equity in the form of REITs back in the last century, a decade ago. What about REITs now, with the decline in US real estate value? You have to at least mention REITs. Some small countries base their currency on US REITs. Carlyle Group reportedly advises its investors that they are hovering like vultures to pounce on undervalued US real estate after that is tanked by rising interest rates. North would blame China for any rise in US interest rates, covering the Carlyle vultures, who always escape Nuremburgs, unless this Skorzeny thing turns out well. When my brother visited Windsor Castle, they told him we are related to the Bush family. Now Skorzeny tells us that the Bush family are social climbers without pedigress, other than that of Aleister Crowley. Does that mean I get to be president? Oh, we don't have presidents anymore, sorry. Another omission in the Tillman execution story is the obvious conclusion that if Jessica Lynch's nurses tried to return her to American lines, that the Iraqis followed the Geneva Convention in treating her well and trying to return her, not even exchange her. Rajiv Chandrasekaran, Washington Post reporter and author, has written that the US occupation did not at any point re-supply or reinforce staff of Iraqi hospitals looted during the US invasion, so that they continually smelled like corpses and feces during the entire US formal occupation. And other mainstream news outlets reported that US forces shot a female ambulance driver in Faluja, destroyed ambulances, and seized hospitals in Faluja and Hit, because they followed the Geneva Convention and treated enemy combatants like Pvt. Jessica Lynch. Bush does quack like a nazi, doesn't he? And then three bullets from Goebbels' Luger to the forehead of Pat Tillman? There must be some refugees from Nuremburg around here, maybe in Floridistan.
[cia-drugs] Fwd: [narconews] Trujillo: Zapatistas Host Thousands in Chiapas
Begin forwarded message: From: David B. Briones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: July 30, 2007 11:00:20 AM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [narconews] Trujillo: Zapatistas Host Thousands in Chiapas Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] July 30, 2007 Please Distribute Widely Dear Colleague, Zapatista rebels in Chiapas, Mexico hosted eight days of meetings that moved through three of the autonomous municipal seats - known as Caracoles - in their territory last week. Juan Trujillo reports from the Caracol of Morelia: Afternoon fell in this corner of the Chiapaneco geography; the cool came down from the two mountains cloaking this rebel space, while militiapersons descended the left hand side of the mountain giving way to members of the Indigenous Revolutionary Clandestine Committee General Command of the EZLN; through the commentary and bustle of the participants the night listened, as Lieutenant Colonel Moises, Comandante Zebedeo, and Subcomandante Marcos made themselves present for the welcoming. Rain and a slight chill intermittently refreshed the visitors from more than 80 countries: hundreds of collectives and social organizations, sympathizers, members of the Other Campaign and adherents of the Sixth Declaration of the Lancandon Jungle (La Sexta). ...For her part Ofelia, member of the Good Government Council, commented with notable emotion, that 'the most important thing is to unite our struggles and thoughts against the capitalist system that continues to steal our labor. Our voice and our struggle is one that as we walk we learn and as we walk we teach... so that we can recuperate what the system has stolen from us.' Finally, she asked all the participants for 'concentration, respect and discipline in the activities of the Encuentro.' Read Trujillo's full report (additional reports await translation on our Spanish language pages, too), along with other Latin American news, at Narco News: http://www.narconews.com From somewhere in a country called América, David B. Briones Webmaster The Narco News Bulletin http://www.narconews.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Narco News is supported by: The Fund for Authentic Journalism P.O. Box 241 Natick, MA 01760 http://www.authenticjournalism.org The Fund receives online donations at this web page: http://www.authenticjournalism.org Apply for your co-publisher's account, here: http://www.narconews.com/copublisher/application.php Subscribe for free alerts of new reports: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/narconews Suscribete gratis para alertas de nuevos reportajes en espanol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/narconewsandes Inscreva-se para alertas gratuitos de reportagens do ultimo minuto em portugues brasileiro: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/narconewsbrasil
[cia-drugs] Fwd: Great-Beast-Bush Building Babylon the Great with Slave Labor
Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: July 26, 2007 10:22:47 PM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Great-Beast-Bush Building Babylon the Great with Slave Labor Foreign Workers Abused at Embassy, Panel Told By William Branigin Washington Post, July 27, 2007; A15 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/26/ AR2007072601792_pf.html Two American civilian contractors who worked on a massive U.S. Embassy construction project in Baghdad told Congress yesterday that foreign laborers were deceptively recruited and trafficked to Iraq to toil at the site, where they experienced physical abuse and substandard working conditions. State Department officials disputed the charges, telling a House committee that inspections had not substantiated the worst reported abuses. The accounts were delivered at a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on allegations of waste, fraud and abuse in the construction of a huge new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad at a cost of nearly $600 million. The embassy, slated to be the largest diplomatic mission in the world, is being built by a Kuwaiti firm, First Kuwaiti General Trading Contracting Co., which was awarded the contract after no U.S. company would meet the unreasonable terms, the committee was told. First Kuwaiti's labor practices are under investigation by the Justice Department, which is looking into allegations that foreign employees were brought into Iraq under false pretenses and were unable to leave because the company had confiscated their passports. First Kuwaiti has termed those allegations ludicrous. The company declined the committee's invitation to testify or provide officials for interviews, said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the oversight committee. Testifying before the committee yesterday, John Owens, an American who worked for First Kuwaiti at the embassy site as a construction foreman from November 2005 to June 2006, said he found living and working conditions for the foreign laborers there deplorable. Because of difficulty hiring Iraqis for work inside the heavily fortified Green Zone, most of the laborers were from such countries as India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, the Philippines and Sierra Leone, the committee was told. Foreign workers lived in tightly packed trailers and had insufficient equipment and basic needs -- stuff like shoes and gloves, Owens said. They worked 12 hours a day, seven days a week, and made as little as $240 a month, he said. They were verbally and physically abused and had their salaries docked for petty infractions, he added. Rory J. Mayberry, an emergency medical technician who worked briefly at the embassy site under a subcontract, testified that he was asked by First Kuwaiti managers to escort 51 Filipinos through the Kuwait airport and onto a flight to Baghdad. However, all of our tickets said we were going to Dubai, he said, adding that a First Kuwaiti manager instructed him not to tell any of the Filipinos that they were going to Baghdad. He said the men were basically kidnapped by First Kuwaiti to work on the U.S. Embassy. Their passports had been confiscated, and they were driven away on buses after landing in Baghdad, then were smuggled into the Green Zone, he said. Howard J. Krongard, the State Department inspector general, strongly disputed the allegations in a subsequent session of the hearing. He testified that a limited review he conducted and inquiries by the inspector general of the U.S.-led military force in Iraq did not substantiate the abuse claims. Nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that human- trafficking violations or other serious abuses occurred at the construction workers' camp at the new embassy compound, Krongard said. Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
[cia-drugs] Re: Omits
Perhaps we can break down the Skorzeny material into a Hatfield softball, a Dub dancing naked on a barstool softball story, a Bush boys duffel bags of coke softball story. If that is the case, the intent is to Rovian-neutralize 911 Floridistan the terrorist sanctuary safer than Osama's Waziristan, and to forestry backfire burn the fire's fuel on Prescott Bush's history of managing Hitler's Economy for US Robber Baron investors in nazi utopia while the plundered suffered the Great Depression here in the US. The Skorzeny material is most likely a feint to sucker resources away from homing in on Porter's home boys in Floridistan, and the Bush family nazi history bulging out in current day manifestations of war crimes and gestapo policies at home and abroad. Tesla tech might be a target as well, as Tesla tech is moving away from stalemated patent efforts that bog down when the fossil fuel king's charter understandably withholds funding and the old Standard Oil thugs take their crowbars and dynamite, figuratively speaking, to the equivalent of independent refineries, same old same old. Tesla tech is increasingly being GPL'd and lugged(linux user grouped) into the hands of the masses as a loss-leader, as inventors begin to bank on making money arond the edges, linux style, instead of waiting for cradle to grave handouts from Big Brother paternalism and the natural enemies of a new energy source. The zionist neocons have been working with the German and English nazis since Lord Cecil, the Rosicrucians, and the German fraternity we know as Sax Goatburgers and Skull and Bones today. Max Ratline, Vietnam's Humanist Revolutionary Worker's Party of Diem brother Nhu and columnist Joseph Alsop, coldwar liberals, always the neocons as outer circle for nazi dot. The outer circle serves as motivational layer and standoff armor. The political goals of the Rothschild family seem liberal at times. When Nathan Rothschild, most powerful of the Rothschild brothers, sons of Amschel Rothschild, moved to England, the Rothschilds had the liberal goals of working against monarchy in Europe but curiously not Britain where they(venetian) had moved their base, and winning in austro-germanic states the rights for Jews of property and political participation. At that point we see again the neocons as outer circle, more popular with the masses in Europe because of working against monarchy and for rights that actually were liberal in the political context. And the nazis stood for the old order, like Kissinger realists backing the Saudi monarchy and Pak heroin junta. Same old same old. The neocons continued their penchant for liberal causes like the green front. At the core we see that Britain, though home of strongest Rothschild brother Nathan Rothschild, is still a monarchy. We see no liberalism, only a nazi style racism, projecting from neocon zionists toward Palestinians, as if the guilt of nazi partners of the neocons has been transferred for a price to the Palestinian scapegoat, innocent of WW2 Jewish holocaust role. The insincerity of the neocon green front is evident in the absurdity of expanding factory farming by clearing more farmland and burning more diesel to cultivate corn for gasohol, and in support of electric cars with a thousand pounds of batteries instead of on-demand hydrogen cars that have been running with Flintstone engines since 1984, and in support of hydrogen gas stations when on-demand hydrogen is safer without the tank, and in continued support of centralized electricity generation instead of pollution-free decentralized options. Neocons and nazis are the same beast because the fake liberal green trojans of the neocons are all impossibly high entropy and pale in comparison of technology which has already been implemented, like water-based on-demand hydrogen cars since 1984. But there is that relationship again, neocons as motivational circle, nazis as dot, with neocon green lies around Houston and Saudi oilmen nazis. Corporatist Darwinism wins both ways. One can see a slightly different orientation between neocons and nazis in the Baker Plan for Iraqwar versus PNAC. Kissinger nazis only wanted to hot swap puppets, retaining national monopoly on oil to make it easier to keep oil in the ground according to the at that time 99 year old plan for reduced supply from Iraq and Iran. Neocons would like to privatize Iraqi oil and topple the Saudi monarchy and possibly the Pak heroin junta to empower political islam with nukes. The nazis would like to retain dictatorial control, always preferring monarchs first, dictators second, and crippled blame-soaking place-holders third. Nazis serve Rockefeller and the Saudis first, neocons are Israel-firsters and may prefer instability and loss of control of oil and nukes. You don't find many Democrat nazis. Neocons place greater emphasis on manipulative idealogies like fake free trade, fake free enterprise competition. Nazis then need only concern themselves with motivating
[cia-drugs] Re: Fwd: Great-Beast-Bush Building Babylon the Great with Slave Labor
Keyword Kuwait. Kuwait is a small oil socialist empire. Small, so the nazis and neocons are not fundamentally opposed to it as socialism, since small eclipses strategic anathema with strategic advantage, as in this case, where Kuwait supports the US military occupation of Iraq. And to support the US occupation of Iraq, all Kuwaitis have to do is do what they do in Kuwait. Every Kuwaiti has a guaranteed income from the government, with which they hire servants imported from Asia-Pacific nations. Now they contract at prices high enough to interest Kuwaitis to bring some of their servants to Iraq. And this solves the mystery of what Kuwaitis are good for. They can work, see, they are working in Iraq. -Bob --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ../../../../post?postID=jtevrzpyk25gz1aCdq-PN3ASjOcaTF7XfLmRAe7PJNUyn30\ Gp1YMBi7NwN6OlywwJ7yzNfY Date: July 26, 2007 10:22:47 PM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ../../../../post?postID=TwjN5rguKi7luKqa3DLd7TDD3Km_Q00m9QIRrzRu7AWjYSX\ ERRgqW_IbdkoQnGN-SJ2I7rzW Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ../../../../post?postID=SHrAz5S7bOZi__wORVb7CQWSqwYuJjLAULF7AWuSz4Z1WFw\ dE8HQpYGO8Pvpf2Ft0xatNg , [EMAIL PROTECTED] ../../../../post?postID=k2nbY4GaIozV3Y6P6M8GOpMbN0yAfUM5xuTkXoiG2L8sfeh\ SCO3mhPbOP6cTQoRaY_E8IbOzP13xQA , [EMAIL PROTECTED] ../../../../post?postID=PeAL6J9QQzDsSoPN_RRcDCTrxtkhhy8o9gMt7Cgj-r3F7GZ\ KTFPJ4wJ8MeXinyiRRs4H Subject: Great-Beast-Bush Building Babylon the Great with Slave Labor Foreign Workers Abused at Embassy, Panel Told By William Branigin Washington Post, July 27, 2007; A15 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/26/AR200707\ 2601792_pf.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/26/AR20070\ 72601792_pf.html Two American civilian contractors who worked on a massive U.S. Embassy construction project in Baghdad http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Baghdad?tid=informline told Congress yesterday that foreign laborers were deceptively recruited and trafficked to Iraq http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/iraq.html?nav=el to toil at the site, where they experienced physical abuse and substandard working conditions. State Department http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+Department+of+Stat\ e?tid=informline officials disputed the charges, telling a House committee that inspections had not substantiated the worst reported abuses. The accounts were delivered at a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+House+Committee+on\ +Oversight+and+Government+Reform?tid=informline on allegations of waste, fraud and abuse in the construction of a huge new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad at a cost of nearly $600 million. The embassy, slated to be the largest diplomatic mission in the world, is being built by a Kuwaiti firm, First Kuwaiti General Trading Contracting Co., which was awarded the contract after no U.S. company would meet the unreasonable terms, the committee was told. First Kuwaiti's labor practices are under investigation by the Justice Department http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/U.S.+Department+of+Just\ ice?tid=informline , which is looking into allegations that foreign employees were brought into Iraq under false pretenses and were unable to leave because the company had confiscated their passports. First Kuwaiti has termed those allegations ludicrous. The company declined the committee's invitation to testify or provide officials for interviews, said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Henry+Waxman?tid=inform\ line , chairman of the oversight committee. Testifying before the committee yesterday, John Owens, an American who worked for First Kuwaiti at the embassy site as a construction foreman from November 2005 to June 2006, said he found living and working conditions for the foreign laborers there deplorable. Because of difficulty hiring Iraqis for work inside the heavily fortified Green Zone http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Baghdad+Green+Zone?tid=\ informline , most of the laborers were from such countries as India http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/india.html?nav=el , Pakistan http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/pakistan.html?nav=\ el , Nepal http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Nepal?tid=informline , Sri Lanka http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Sri+Lanka?tid=informlin\ e , the Philippines http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Philippines?tid=informl\ ine and Sierra Leone http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Sierra+Leone?tid=inform\ line , the committee was told. Foreign workers lived in tightly packed trailers and had insufficient equipment and basic needs -- stuff like shoes and gloves, Owens said. They worked 12 hours a day, seven days a week, and made as little as $240 a month, he said. They
[cia-drugs] Re: Corporate America: Freedom's Greatest Threat
business interests normally work to the betterment of America's overall health, both commercially and politically That is an example of Darwinist propaganda for corporatism. Rockefeller's thugs taking crowbars and dynamite to independent refineries was just Darwinists survival of the fittest, advertising tells us. But are crowbars and dynamite really competiton? How about KKK church-burning, Hitler's Final Solution, and Israeli bulldozers, are those policies just competition? Is the king's charter really competition, or anti-competition, along with crowbars, dynamite, and bulldozers? How about racism, is racism just a healthy Darwinist crusade? Racism is often presented as helping Darwin, see Vanity of the Philosopher by David Levy for historical documentation ad infinitum. Are you aware that America has almost as many civilian contractors in Iraq as we do military personnel? Try to look through Iraqi eyes at no-bid contracts for US corporations, which employ non-Iraqi engineers and non-Iraqis in all the good jobs, and which needs then to employ an army of non-Iraqi security contractors. Do you see any benefit to Iraqis? Do you see the racism? Now, are you sure you want to call racist piracy Darwin's fore-runner, benevolent champion of higher political and economic ideals? Or is it just RACIST NAZI LOOTING AND PILLAGING BY NEO-VIKING corporatist pirates, whitewashed by Darwinist advertising? -Bob --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, norgesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Corporate America: Freedom's Greatest Threat by Chuck Baldwin July 27, 2007 Most of us who believe in the free enterprise system have been taught that business interests normally work to the betterment of America's overall health, both commercially and politically. While there might have been a time when this was true, it is definitely not true today. Not only has Big Business become unfriendly to the principles of freedom, it has also become freedom's greatest threat. To say that Corporate America is America's greatest threat is a harsh accusation, but one that I believe is warranted. I will even be so bold as to say that freedom has much more to fear from today's Chambers of Commerce than it does from Al Qaida. Today's Americans need to carefully heed the sage counsel of Thomas Jefferson, who said, Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. The truth of that statement aptly explains the serious damage that Big Business is currently inflicting upon our liberties. Someone rightly observed that one can determine the focus of, and influence upon, societies by analyzing its architecture. For example, from the founding of Jamestown in 1607 through the beginning of the War for Southern Independence, the most notable buildings (in most communities) belonged to churches. From the mid-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century, the most prominent buildings belonged to various governments. From the mid-twentieth century to the present, the biggest, most lavish, and most notable buildings belong to Big Business. This is not accidental or coincidental. These buildings are the monuments of men to the ideas that mean the most to them. Accordingly, a vast number of today's Americans have come to worship at the shrine of Big Business. However, this idolatry comes at great price. Not the least of which is the way we have allowed Big Business interests to virtually control governmental policy, including our war and defense policies. For example, I recently obtained a copy of the U.S. Navy's Playbook. This Playbook succinctly summarizes the Department of the Navy's policies and guidelines, and is made available to naval officers and to public affairs professionals. Under the section entitled Vision it states, Americans secure at home and abroad; sea and air lanes open and free for the peaceful and productive movement of international commerce; enduring national and international naval relationships that remain strong and true; steadily deepening cooperation among the maritime forces of emerging partner nations . . . Notice the emphasis of international commerce, international naval relations, and emerging partner nations. Under the section entitled Focus On Execution it states, We must continue to embrace the vital contributions that out [sic] partners make in working to secure the global community. Notice that part of our Navy's policy is to secure the global community. So, who is our military charged to defend? Is it the American people? Is it the global community, or is it Big Business? Navy brass might answer, All of the above. However, it should seem obvious to anyone who is paying attention that in the grand scheme of things, the will and interests of the American people are being submerged under the will and interests of Big Business, which is creating the global community. Under the section Maritime Strategy it states, This new Maritime
