CCNP1 vs 2 Questions, (was Re: CCNP 2.0 objectives!! U asked for them!)
Hello, "Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert" -- 1) Does anybody know exactly what is the process for "re-certification"? 2) Do we need to take the regular 50x CCNP2 exam OR will there be separate e-Certification Exams? 3) I am a CCNA/CCDA now studying for CCNP, if I have to take the Regular CCNP2(50x) Exams to maintain Qualification, may be it is better to just go for the 50x exams now, right? 4) Also, Can I take the ACRC, and CLSC before July 31, and take the BCRAN, and CIT2 after July 31 and still be CCNP1, or do you lose all chance of becoming CCNP1.0 after July 31? If anybody has more info on the RE-Certification Process along with any suggestions, please let us know. Sincerely, Venkat CCNA/DA, Solaris Adm7 Lou Nelson wrote: Having taken and passed all CCNP Version 2 I can see these are correct.. although not very specific http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bscn.pdf http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcmsn.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcran.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/cit.pdf Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP1 vs 2 Questions, (was Re: CCNP 2.0 objectives!! U asked for them!)
Hello, "Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert" -- 1) Does anybody know exactly what is the process for "re-certification"? 2) Do we need to take the regular 50x CCNP2 exam OR will there be separate e-Certification Exams? 3) I am a CCNA/CCDA now studying for CCNP, if I have to take the Regular CCNP2(50x) Exams to maintain Qualification, may be it is better to just go for the 50x exams now, right? 4) Also, Can I take the ACRC, and CLSC before July 31, and take the BCRAN, and CIT2 after July 31 and still be CCNP1, or do you lose all chance of becoming CCNP1.0 after July 31? If anybody has more info on the RE-Certification Process along with any suggestions, please let us know. Sincerely, Venkat CCNA/DA, Solaris Adm7 Lou Nelson wrote: Having taken and passed all CCNP Version 2 I can see these are correct.. although not very specific http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bscn.pdf http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcmsn.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcran.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/cit.pdf Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP1 vs 2 Questions, (was Re: CCNP 2.0 objectives!! U asked for them!)
Hello, "Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert" -- 1) Does anybody know exactly what is the process for "re-certification"? 2) Do we need to take the regular 50x CCNP2 exam OR will there be separate e-Certification Exams? 3) I am a CCNA/CCDA now studying for CCNP, if I have to take the Regular CCNP2(50x) Exams to maintain Qualification, may be it is better to just go for the 50x exams now, right? 4) Also, Can I take the ACRC, and CLSC before July 31, and take the BCRAN, and CIT2 after July 31 and still be CCNP1, or do you lose all chance of becoming CCNP1.0 after July 31? If anybody has more info on the RE-Certification Process along with any suggestions, please let us know. Sincerely, Venkat CCNA/DA, Solaris Adm7 Lou Nelson wrote: Having taken and passed all CCNP Version 2 I can see these are correct.. although not very specific http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bscn.pdf http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcmsn.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcran.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/cit.pdf Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP1 vs 2 Questions, (was Re: CCNP 2.0 objectives!! U asked for them!)
Hello, "Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert" -- 1) Does anybody know exactly what is the process for "re-certification"? 2) Do we need to take the regular 50x CCNP2 exam OR will there be separate e-Certification Exams? 3) I am a CCNA/CCDA now studying for CCNP, if I have to take the Regular CCNP2(50x) Exams to maintain Qualification, may be it is better to just go for the 50x exams now, right? 4) Also, Can I take the ACRC, and CLSC before July 31, and take the BCRAN, and CIT2 after July 31 and still be CCNP1, or do you lose all chance of becoming CCNP1.0 after July 31? If anybody has more info on the RE-Certification Process along with any suggestions, please let us know. Sincerely, Venkat CCNA/DA, Solaris Adm7 Lou Nelson wrote: Having taken and passed all CCNP Version 2 I can see these are correct.. although not very specific http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bscn.pdf http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcmsn.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcran.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/cit.pdf Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP1 vs 2 Questions, (was Re: CCNP 2.0 objectives!! U asked for them!)
Hello, "Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert" -- 1) Does anybody know exactly what is the process for "re-certification"? 2) Do we need to take the regular 50x CCNP2 exam OR will there be separate e-Certification Exams? 3) I am a CCNA/CCDA now studying for CCNP, if I have to take the Regular CCNP2(50x) Exams to maintain Qualification, may be it is better to just go for the 50x exams now, right? 4) Also, Can I take the ACRC, and CLSC before July 31, and take the BCRAN, and CIT2 after July 31 and still be CCNP1, or do you lose all chance of becoming CCNP1.0 after July 31? If anybody has more info on the RE-Certification Process along with any suggestions, please let us know. Sincerely, Venkat CCNA/DA, Solaris Adm7 Lou Nelson wrote: Having taken and passed all CCNP Version 2 I can see these are correct.. although not very specific http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bscn.pdf http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcmsn.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcran.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/cit.pdf Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP1 vs 2 Questions, (was Re: CCNP 2.0 objectives!! U asked for them!)
Hello, "Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert" -- 1) Does anybody know exactly what is the process for "re-certification"? 2) Do we need to take the regular 50x CCNP2 exam OR will there be separate e-Certification Exams? 3) I am a CCNA/CCDA now studying for CCNP, if I have to take the Regular CCNP2(50x) Exams to maintain Qualification, may be it is better to just go for the 50x exams now, right? 4) Also, Can I take the ACRC, and CLSC before July 31, and take the BCRAN, and CIT2 after July 31 and still be CCNP1, or do you lose all chance of becoming CCNP1.0 after July 31? If anybody has more info on the RE-Certification Process along with any suggestions, please let us know. Sincerely, Venkat CCNA/DA, Solaris Adm7 Lou Nelson wrote: Having taken and passed all CCNP Version 2 I can see these are correct.. although not very specific http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bscn.pdf http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcmsn.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/bcran.pd f http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/cit.pdf Also I have it on good authority (rumor) that the CCNPs version 1 will have to recert prior to Jan 01 to maintain their cert Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Documentation CD
I agree, spent too much time uninstalling and reinstalling just trying to get something out of my CD's. Even looked at Adobe's reader and found a Verity search engine add-on in their. Plus Cisco CD's wants old QTIme technology. GO figure. Steve ""Bharat Suneja"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8ifomk$o82$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8ifomk$o82$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think it sucks big time. why couldn't they make a better documentation CD ? Does it make any sense for a company like Cisco to stick to a dying platform like Netscape ? That browser has so many incompatiblities with standards, it's hard to believe!! And this was true even before the AOL acquisition. I tried the latest documentation CD - I think I have March 2000. The CD says I can set it up to use it with IE! However, after installation, it craps out! I can't even open simple HTML docs on the documentation CD (on Windows 2000) - all I get is garbled text!! Now, isn't HTML supposed to be read equally well by all browsers ??? Please help Cisco!! A lot of us are now using Windows 2000 (it works great on laptops, btw!! Much better than any other OS I've ever used!!), and probably the majority of us use IE now! Don't shut us out of the Documentation CD please!! Bharat Suneja ""Ledwidge, Feargal"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message CD9DBAE1E066D311A8AE00805FA7F57C031DF686@NTMAIL03">news:CD9DBAE1E066D311A8AE00805FA7F57C031DF686@NTMAIL03... The CD's search engine uses Verity's search engine. This is waht their FAQ says: No, the current release of CD Web Publisher will not work on Windows 2000. Windows 2000 has significant architecture changes from its predecessors. As a result, your current CD Web Publisher application will not work. Support for Windows 2000 is planned. This support will require the creation of a new application (i.e.: you will not be able to add this functionality into your existing application). So ... we'll just to wait and see Feargal -Original Message- From: Russell Lusignan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Documentation CD Anyone get a recent version of the Cisco Doc CD to run under Win2000 and use IE instead of Netscape? I tried the Jan2000 version but it doesn't seem to want to run under Netscape and IE. Anyone? Russ.. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DSL router with dialup backup
Ole, DSL does go down, but it is getting better. if you are using your local Telco for the service then your phone line should be up 100%. When using a modem on the same line you will be limited to 28.8k, if you want to use 33.6k you will have to use another phone line for that, and if you are going to use a v.90 connection to the internet and then use PPTP you definitely will have to use another phone line for backup. That will give you 56k down, 33.6 up. B/up dial up can be a good thing to have for the infrequent times you need it. As to your printing, it all depends on the printer definitions at the local sites. You will need a printer driver local, and one wan if you want to use the print server. A good thing to have here is Win2000 terminal server. Steve "Ole Drews Jensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 2019FB428FD3D311893700508B71EBFB191B48@RWR_MAIL_SVR">news:2019FB428FD3D311893700508B71EBFB191B48@RWR_MAIL_SVR... If I get ADSL Internet access with my local telco, the DSL can run on one of my existing phone lines, and by using VPN I can create a connection between a branch office and the head office. If I choose to have route redundancy by using a DSL router that have the ability to use a modem, and then setup an additional 56Kbps modem route with a higher cost, it should dial my head office in case the DSL route goes down. BUT, has anyone ever seen the ADSL being down but the phone line still up? Also, how often does it happen that a DSL connection is down? A third (off topic / off the subject) question: I currently have a mixed Novell NetWare 4.1 and Windows NT 4.0 network with HP printers connected to the network with HP jetdirect nic's. I am currently using Novell's print queues for the net print services (which is working very well), but I would like to use my Novell server as a boat anchor, and I have not had to good experience with NT's print services, and I would like to be able to print directly to the printer at my branch offices, instead of having the data sent over and back the WAN first. Using Windows 98 workstations, what would be a good way of solving this problem? Thanks for any comments on this, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aggregate Graphs on MRTG
I know we can graph multiple interfaces on a single graph using MRTG, but how ? can anyone provide a sample CFG ? Beat regards 'Bliss' ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDA Exam questions
I am scheduled to take the CCDA exam on Tue June 20. Does anyone know the total number of questions and the passing score. Thanks Sam ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Link Flapping
Hey all, i've looked in the archives and can't really find an answer. I'm currently studying for my CCDA and I was doing a BOSON test question and I came accross the term, link flapping in coherence with Convergence. I've never heard that term, i've looked at the Appendices/Glossary of my CCDA book and in the archives of this mailing list and couldn't find an answer. Just curious does this word even exsist? If so how does it relate to convergence. Thanks! -- - Marco Paulo Rodrigues Junior Unix Systems Operator Axxent Corporation www: http://www.axxent.ca Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work Phone : 1 + (416) 907-2880 TSE Stock Symbol : axi.b - ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNA 1.0 format
Folks, A few quick questions about CCNA 1.0 format: 1. Does a question let you know if a it requires multiple answers? 2. Any appletalk questions? 3. Any ATM configuration questions? 4. Any VLAN question (noticed this is heavily focus in CCNA 2.0) Many thanks. DC ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Link Flapping
It bascially refers to a link going up and down continually, causing routing protocols to go into action. Another term you'll hear is "route flapping." Marco Rodrigues wrote: Hey all, i've looked in the archives and can't really find an answer. I'm currently studying for my CCDA and I was doing a BOSON test question and I came accross the term, link flapping in coherence with Convergence. I've never heard that term, i've looked at the Appendices/Glossary of my CCDA book and in the archives of this mailing list and couldn't find an answer. Just curious does this word even exsist? If so how does it relate to convergence. Thanks! -- - Marco Paulo Rodrigues Junior Unix Systems Operator Axxent Corporation www: http://www.axxent.ca Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work Phone : 1 + (416) 907-2880 TSE Stock Symbol : axi.b - ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Did you just say CCNA two point oh?
I'm in the same boat (with CCNA 1.0 material). I have decided to take CCNA 1.0 (next week) and then pursue CCNP 2.0. Either CCNA 1.0 or 2.0 with satisfy CCNP 2.0's requirement: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.ht ml Good Luck. DC ""Max N. Fritzergald"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8iiqgl$4jo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8iiqgl$4jo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I bought ICRC and Lammle's CCNA last year, but never quite found the time to read it until now. Just when I was eager to read and take the exam this summer, I found out about CCNA 2.0 and that CCNA 1.0 exam was expiring on July 31st. Let's see, would I be qualified to take the CCNP 2.0 exams, after CCNA 1.0? or would I have to start new and take CCNA 2.0 anyways? Would it be advisable to take the 1.0 or 2.0 exam at THIS very point? And Microsoft wants me to take the Win2K accelerated exam by the end of this year. Pressure Pressure. Max ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT using Windows 2000 Server
I have a cable modem and I would like a clear explanation on how to set up N AT using Windows 2000 Server. I have a small hub with 2 workstations and th e server hooked up to it. The server has 2 NIC cards. The USB 10/100 SMC i s connected directly to the cable modem. The other NIC card is dynamic, run ning DHCP on the server. Do I also set up DNS etc. Thanks to anyone who helps me. -- Sincerely, Douglas James Howe Cisco Certified Networking Associate ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Did you just say CCNA two point oh?
I'm in the same boat (with CCNA 1.0 material). I have decided to take CCNA 1.0 (next week) and then pursue CCNP 2.0. Either CCNA 1.0 or 2.0 with satisfy CCNP 2.0's requirement: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.ht ml Good Luck. DC ""Max N. Fritzergald"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8iiqgl$4jo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8iiqgl$4jo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I bought ICRC and Lammle's CCNA last year, but never quite found the time to read it until now. Just when I was eager to read and take the exam this summer, I found out about CCNA 2.0 and that CCNA 1.0 exam was expiring on July 31st. Let's see, would I be qualified to take the CCNP 2.0 exams, after CCNA 1.0? or would I have to start new and take CCNA 2.0 anyways? Would it be advisable to take the 1.0 or 2.0 exam at THIS very point? And Microsoft wants me to take the Win2K accelerated exam by the end of this year. Pressure Pressure. Max ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Did you just say CCNA two point oh?
I'm in the same boat (with CCNA 1.0 material). I have decided to take CCNA 1.0 (next week) and then pursue CCNP 2.0. Either CCNA 1.0 or 2.0 with satisfy CCNP 2.0's requirement: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.ht ml Good Luck. DC ""Max N. Fritzergald"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8iiqgl$4jo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8iiqgl$4jo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I bought ICRC and Lammle's CCNA last year, but never quite found the time to read it until now. Just when I was eager to read and take the exam this summer, I found out about CCNA 2.0 and that CCNA 1.0 exam was expiring on July 31st. Let's see, would I be qualified to take the CCNP 2.0 exams, after CCNA 1.0? or would I have to start new and take CCNA 2.0 anyways? Would it be advisable to take the 1.0 or 2.0 exam at THIS very point? And Microsoft wants me to take the Win2K accelerated exam by the end of this year. Pressure Pressure. Max ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alternative for specific packet filtering
I've been reading and trying to understand interior redistribution and came across the following technique as an alternative for the specific packet filtering requirement of discarding certain packets based solely on their destination address. In this case Cisco static route command are used to discard packets destined to private address space using null0. Here is an example: ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0.0 null0 My question is whether it is possible to show the system log and display the number of times a packet was discarded destined to private or RFC1918 address space. If the logs showed that, would it also show the source? I don't have a test lab setup to try this but was hoping someone on the list has experience with this. Thanks for you help.. dj ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP dampening
Does anyone know how can I setup a BGP network to test my BGP dampening setting in the routers ? Rgds begin:vcard n:Lee;Wallace tel;fax:25906443 tel;work:28622682 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Netstar (Hong Kong) Limited adr:;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Consultant, CCDA, CCNA fn:Wallace Lee end:vcard
Re: Cisco service aggrement
Stephen, This mystical nirvana is CCO...Ta Daa. You will need a mystical logon ID and mystical password. To get those you must pay cold real hard cash. This is not the easiest thing to do, and the only solution I have found is to call Cust Service, bow down before them, and pay through the nose. While it might not be expensive as a business cost (can be written off) as a learning tool it is prohibitively expensive. There is much useful info therein, a NG of sorts, support, and code that we all dream of. As you must have found out, it is not the easiest place to sort info, but getting better, a very frustrating experience to gather certain types of info. But it does have some good points. I wish there was some kind of student discount, as in MS products. Steve Shane ""Stephen C"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 031101bfd7b8$080eb880$3d0fe33f@oemcomputer">news:031101bfd7b8$080eb880$3d0fe33f@oemcomputer... Maybe I have been over looking something on Cisoc.com, or maybe not :) I recently acquired several 2524's to study with and start my lab. They all have 11.0. what ever on them. I have been told that Cisco offers service agreements whereby IOS's can be updated on the Router that the contract is taken out on and I would very much like to update one of mine to a newer version.:( I haven't found the place yet or maybe I'm to impatient. Please, Where the heck is this mythical "cisco" nirvana. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
