CSU
Can anyone please tell me what is a CSU? And what is it used for? Hunt =^o^= _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CSU
CSU is a channel service unit. A CSU/DSU is similar to a modem in that it converts analog signals to digital, as well as providing a mechanism for breaking down individual DS0's in a DS1 so that they can be bundled or muxed out. This would be the piece of equipment between you and the Telco, a typical configuration would be Router to CSU/DSU to Telco SmartJack or local DAX to local loop to long haul to remote local loop to smart jack / local DAX to CSU/DSU to Router. Several flavors of routers have CSU/DSU's built into them so that the external box is no longer necessary in some cases. Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunt Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 5:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CSU Can anyone please tell me what is a CSU? And what is it used for? Hunt =^o^= _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RJ45 to AUI
Any cabling ideas. I need an RJ45 connection to DB15, for a remote = transceiver... Much appreciated !!! Merry Christmas !!! Phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RJ45 to AUI
get a transceiver... we have a bunch of aui to fiber transceivers, they come in all flavors Tim ""Circusnuts"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 007501c06d89$497dc420$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:007501c06d89$497dc420$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Any cabling ideas. I need an RJ45 connection to DB15, for a remote = transceiver... Much appreciated !!! Merry Christmas !!! Phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RJ45 to AUI
here is website with cable pinouts . http://www.pin-outs.com/datasheet_21.html hth chuck dunkirk Circusnuts wrote: Any cabling ideas. I need an RJ45 connection to DB15, for a remote = transceiver... Much appreciated !!! Merry Christmas !!! Phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T'was the day before Christmas......
I just wanted to take this time to extend the from my family the many = blessing and good tidings to "The Groupstudy Family". Although some if us don't celebrate this day...it is not the day so much = but the feeling of sharing, kindness, joy, goodwill and continued peace = between "God and MAN" and as well ALL MEN. In this spirit we unite in = giving praise to God for he has been so good to each and everyone of us. I hope this time is spent with family and friends embracing what we = sometimes take for granted throughout the year. To ALL, " Merry Christmas" " Feliz Navidad" " Happy Hanukah" " Happy Kwanzaa" " Joyeux Noel" -Nigel _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two DLCI numbers?
You're pretty hip Howard. Woof..dj ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:p05001900b66b4012be7a@[63.216.127.98]... The only limitation on DLCI's is that they fall in the range of 16-1005 ( or so? ) A DLCI of 0 indicates an LMI ANSI frame. A DLCI of 1023 indicates an LMI CISCO frame. The rest are used by the telco for some nefarious purpose I have never seen explained anyplace. The 1006-1022 range was intended for carrier-provided multicasting. Can't say I ever saw it used. Tony, you must have a lot of stuff you can clarify for us router jocks. Keep telling us the inside stuff from the telco side. I'm something of an old dog who learned a lot from hard knocks and a lot of time of the telephone asking the other end to explain things in a way that didn't make my head hurt. Learned a lot. Can always use a few more bits and pieces. Did the hard knocks let you and the other dogs out? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List/EIGRP Problem
the rule of the game for access-list is first specify the more specific then go on to the general --- Minh Vu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agreed with Chuck. If your first line in ACL is "Deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any", seem to me it will deny all IP regardless you put permit IP after it. (as of my head, router will go from top down, which is check 1st ACL if not match then go to 2nd ACL and if not match then go to 3rd ACLand so on...) In this case you put the deny any host on your 1st ACL then it match therefore it will drop the packet without go to next ACL. ip access-list extended FrameInbound deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any permit ip 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 1:30 PM Subject: RE: Access List/EIGRP Problem This topic brings up some of the subtleties with regards to access lists. Now that I am looking into more complex interactions among protocols and services, I am finding that just about any time I have to engage access-lists I have to begin thinking in far broader terms than I am used to. And certainly in far broader terms than several of the well known introductory and CCNA level books suggest. There is nothing like applying a standard access list to an interface, then a few minutes later seeing your routes disappear! Some of the more advanced texts suggest constructing access-lists such that most specific items appear first, and then filter down to least specific. Others may suggest that one put the mostly likely to be used things at the top of the lists and work down. I'm getting to the point where I have to remember to put routing protocol items at the top of my lists. I guess what I'm getting to in my rambling way is that access-list construction and placement is probably more of n art than a science. One must always consider what one is doing, and why. One must always consider the law of unintended consequences. Happy holidays! Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Skinner Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 12:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Access List/EIGRP Problem your access-list is the wrong way round ..you have a deny host any any I.E your 0.0.0.0 is treated as a any any then the permit if oyu put them the other way round it should work From: "Stull, Cory" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Stull, Cory" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Edward Gomez'" [EMAIL PROTECTED], "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Access List/EIGRP Problem Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:05:07 -0600 Edward, Without seeing your whole config we can't be positive but your probably also blocking your EIGRP hellos. You might want to go with distribute-list anyway. Go to cisco.com and lookup distribute-list and go to the link on using it with EIGRP. Good luck Cory -Original Message- From: Edward Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 8:30 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Access List/EIGRP Problem Hi everybody, I am having an issue with the following access list. I am trying to put an ACL on my frame router that can limit which network inside my company a partner can access. I basically want any traffic coming from 192.168.50.0 to be able to go to 192.168.5.0. When I apply the access list nothing gets through. If I ping a remote address I get a TTL expired in transit. I am running EIGRP between the routers. Do I need to have an access list that allows access to the LAN side for EIGRP updates? or is this done via the WAN port? What am I doing wrong here?? ip access-list extended FrameInbound deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any permit ip 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 I have also tried: permit ip 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.5.0 and that did not work either. Thanks in advance!!! Eddie -- Edward J. Gomez, MCSE, CNE, CCNA Information Systems Manager ProxyMed, Inc 2555 Davie Road, Suite 110 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33317 (954) 473-1001 x315 http://www.proxymed.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Re: Two DLCI numbers?
You're pretty hip Howard. Woof..dj Well, there are networking parables. Presumably, if the place where the dogs were before they were out is a multicast server, then whoever let them out should be tracable back to an IGMP JOIN. Unless, of course, this all took place at layer 2. And I really want to avoid a discussion of whether or not ARF is layer 2 or layer 3, much less reverse ARF and inverse ARF. My esteemed feline associate, Clifford, does do fairly good proxy ARF while in native CAT mode. Tony, you must have a lot of stuff you can clarify for us router jocks. Keep telling us the inside stuff from the telco side. I'm something of an old dog who learned a lot from hard knocks and a lot of time of the telephone asking the other end to explain things in a way that didn't make my head hurt. Learned a lot. Can always use a few more bits and pieces. Did the hard knocks let you and the other dogs out? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List/EIGRP Problem
Like everything else, it depends. For short lists, it doesn't make all that much difference. For complex lists, I agree that most specific first is far easier to understand and troubleshoot. Performance problems with access lists are more likely to be associated with the fact that an access list is there (i.e., forcing traffic into a slower switching path) than to be caused by the total number of rules. The number of rules was more of a concern in early IOS releases where almost everything was process switched. The most complex access lists will usually be machine-generated, so they can be tuned for performance. You'll see some extreme cases in carriers; I know of a tier 1 ISP that has to restore its configuration from TFTP, not NVRAM, because NVRAM doesn't hold the 8000-plus access list rules they use. the rule of the game for access-list is first specify the more specific then go on to the general --- Minh Vu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agreed with Chuck. If your first line in ACL is "Deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any", seem to me it will deny all IP regardless you put permit IP after it. (as of my head, router will go from top down, which is check 1st ACL if not match then go to 2nd ACL and if not match then go to 3rd ACLand so on...) In this case you put the deny any host on your 1st ACL then it match therefore it will drop the packet without go to next ACL. ip access-list extended FrameInbound deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any permit ip 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 1:30 PM Subject: RE: Access List/EIGRP Problem This topic brings up some of the subtleties with regards to access lists. Now that I am looking into more complex interactions among protocols and services, I am finding that just about any time I have to engage access-lists I have to begin thinking in far broader terms than I am used to. And certainly in far broader terms than several of the well known introductory and CCNA level books suggest. There is nothing like applying a standard access list to an interface, then a few minutes later seeing your routes disappear! Some of the more advanced texts suggest constructing access-lists such that most specific items appear first, and then filter down to least specific. Others may suggest that one put the mostly likely to be used things at the top of the lists and work down. I'm getting to the point where I have to remember to put routing protocol items at the top of my lists. I guess what I'm getting to in my rambling way is that access-list construction and placement is probably more of n art than a science. One must always consider what one is doing, and why. One must always consider the law of unintended consequences. Happy holidays! Chuck _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confused by access-list
The following is an access-list entered on a Cisco router: access-list 135 deny tcp 172.16.16.0 0.0.15.255 172.16.32.0 0.0.15.255 eq telnet access-list 135 permit ip any any brWhich of the following would not apply if this access-list is used to control incoming packets on ethernet 0? A. address 172.16.1.1 will be denied telnet access to address 172.16.37.5 B. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.32.1 C. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.50.1 D. address 172.16.30.12 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.32.12 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confused by the access-list question
The following is an access-list entered on a Cisco router: access-list 135 deny tcp 172.16.16.0 0.0.15.255 172.16.32.0 0.0.15.255 eq telnet access-list 135 permit ip any any brWhich of the following would not apply if this access-list is used to control incoming packets on ethernet 0? A. address 172.16.1.1 will be denied telnet access to address 172.16.37.5 B. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.32.1 C. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.50.1 D. address 172.16.30.12 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.32.12 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confused by the access-list question
Access list is stopping telnet access from range of addresses 172.16.16.0-172.16.31.255 to range of addresses 172.16.32.0-172.16.47.255. Or from 172.16.16.0/20 to 172.16.32.0/20. So answer B is the only one which does not apply. Unless my hangover's playing tricks on me. Cheers, Gareth ""lishengtao"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 925adn$8lo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:925adn$8lo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The following is an access-list entered on a Cisco router: access-list 135 deny tcp 172.16.16.0 0.0.15.255 172.16.32.0 0.0.15.255 eq telnet access-list 135 permit ip any any brWhich of the following would not apply if this access-list is used to control incoming packets on ethernet 0? A. address 172.16.1.1 will be denied telnet access to address 172.16.37.5 B. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.32.1 C. address 172.16.16.1 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.50.1 D. address 172.16.30.12 will be permitted telnet access to address 172.16.32.12 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Subject
Happy X-mas to all of the group members. Thanks, Rajeshkumar Netwrok Engineer, DishnetDSL ISP, India. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE practice exams (Boson)
I have seen posts stating that Boson was not a good prep for the CCIE written. Now recently I have heard that Boson updated their CCIE Practice exams and they are actually pretty good. Any comments. Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Jim Healis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, at one time I thought that I was knowledgeable. I wouldn't say that about myself tonight. I started taking the Boson practice exams for the CCIE written, and I am realizing just how much I don't know. I have been consistently getting 50-52%. It's like I have hit a plateau in my knowledge. I will say, however, that what I do know is in direct line with the kind of work I have been doing for the past 3 years. Well, I guess I didn't have much of a point to this message... just to take up space, and let people know where I am at in my studies for those that don't care, please refrain from criticism. Thanks! -j _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP - past! Phew....
Good Job ! Try to get some specialzations befor you go for the CCIE as I am doing ! CCNP Voice + Security and more to come Regards Elias Aggelidis - Original Message - From: "Ryan Ngai Hon Kong" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 6:13 AM Subject: CCNP - past! Phew Feels like the most wonderful gift on Christmas, a new title on my forehead. CCNA on August 2000 CCNP on today, 22nd December 2000 Thanks everyone. Ryan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP
Try to get as much seminars as you can and read the CCO again and again ! After that get the Boson test to get the expresion how the test is. Regrds Elias Aggelidis CCNP + Voice + Security - Original Message - From: "Manny Colon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 11:00 PM Subject: CCNP I have only been in the field for 6 months now. I am going to start studying for the CCNP exam after the holidays. I plan on taking the BCMSN test first.Can anyone offer any advice on how to go about studying for the exams? Are the Cisco Press books good study guides? Should I invest in the CIM software? Any advice would be helpful. -- Regards, Manny Colon Computer Services Information Builders Inc. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RJ45 to AUI
Circusnuts wrote: Any cabling ideas. I need an RJ45 connection to DB15, for a remote transceiver... You need a transceiver on the AUI end. Allied Telesyn makes some economical ones. You can't do any cabling magic, a transceiver is an active device requiring some smarts. Jeff Kell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL
You know, this is one of those things that really annoys me. The 1750 would be a *perfect* lab router if it could do 802.1q on the fast ethernet interface. Is this a hardware limitation or a software limitation? Of course, add 802.1q to the 1700 and the capabilities of the 1700 begin to encroach on 2600 territory, so I suspect that the lack of trunking is a conscious decision intended to distinguish between models. Ben At 12:19 PM +0200 12/23/00, Elias Aggelidis wrote: IT DOES NOT SUPPORT TRUNKS ! Only 26xx and 36xx can do it ! - Original Message - From: "Mark Krysinski" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:58 PM Subject: ISL Does anyone know if you can use a 1750 with a 10/100 port in place of a 2600 series router for ISL? Thank you, Mark _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updated Practice Lab Materials Available
Yes. They have been discussed in the archives before. If the underlying question is, how good? Then yes again. Pros: Very ECP1 like. The books read like they were written for a classroom format. The content is like a reverse engineered CCIE exam. Cons: They need more rent-a-racks. When I bought a year ago, they would be booked up for 4-6 months because they had a single rack. Their website used to look amateur - and was slow, this looks fixed now. Summary: Good material / content - good addition to the CCIE prep bookshelf. You had better have access to some equipment though to practice. ""Patrick Murphy"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 019201c06cf9$296f7240$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:019201c06cf9$296f7240$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Anyone ever use these? - Original Message - From: "Support" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 11:56 AM Subject: Updated Practice Lab Materials Available - See http://www.solutionlabs.com for additional details. . . * SolutionLabs v1.20 Workbook Materials Officially Available * SolutionLabs v1.20 Workbooks integrates topics from the CCIE Routing Switching revision 7.x lab examinations. VoIP, Multicast, and additional ATM lab scenarios have been added in v1.20 to accurately reflect elements reported to be present in the latest revisions of the practical exam. Numerous refinements in this fourth generation release have been made to existing sections of both workbooks to ensure quality lab materials that simulate an actual CCIE Routing Switching lab exam. The v1.20 Workbook Bundle includes a revised Scenario Notes - Audit - Answer Key (SNAAK) that now includes an expanded Scenario Notes section to include step-by-step lab scenario walk-thrus. The SNAAK Workbook has now grown to 345 pages in length. - This is a no cost update for all previous SolutionLabs Workbook I, v1.02, v1.05, v1.10, and v1.12 customers. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Happy Holidays
=20 Dear family and friends, Merry Christmas. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router ID in OSPF
thanks for all your help "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:p05001902b669209cb2e1@[63.216.127.98]... Hi everybody: I am study BSCN,there are something confused me: in the book they says:The highest IP address on an active interface is normally used as the router ID, but this can be overridden by configuring an IP address on a loopback interface. I want to know which will be the Router ID if the loopback IP address smaller than the active interface IP address? Any suggestion will be appreciate,thanks. Will Guan frome Peking, China If there are multiple loopback, the router ID will be the numerically highest IP address on any loopback. In other words, int loop 0 int loop 1 int loop 2 ip addr 1.2.3.4 ip addr 5.6.7.8 ip addr 2.3.4.6 The router ID, in this case, was 5.6.7.8. If there is only a single loopback interface, its IP address will always be the router ID: int loop 0 int ser 0 int ser 1 ip addr 1.2.3.4 ip addr 5.6.7.8 ip addr 2.3.4.6 Here, the router ID would be 1.2.3.4. If there were no loopback interfaces, the numerically highest active interface would be used: int eth 0 int ser 0 int ser 1 ip addr 1.2.3.4 ip addr 5.6.7.8 ip addr 2.3.4.6 no shutdown shutdown no shutdown 2.3.4.6 would be the router ID. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Security Beta Results??
All, Has anyone heard any feedback on the security beta exam results, if you have failed/passed etc? Thanks, Mike __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL to 2600 series router
Michael Everett wrote: In my lab at work I have 2 2924xl switches, 1 cat5509, and a Cisco 2600 router with a 10/100 ethernet port. The router will not enable me to enter an encapsulation command on the ethernet interface. Is ISL not an option on plan old 10/100 ethernet? Will it only work on a fast ethernet interface? Dumb question, what is the functional difference between an ethernet interface configured to run at 100m full duplex and a fast ethernet interface? If you wish to respond to me directly please send replies to, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to upgrade your IOS to a 12.x version or Enterprise version -- Sedarin Perry Network Engineer NTRDimensional.net _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about BCMSN
Hi, gurus, are there CCO/TAC related questions in BCMSN ?? if there are, what do they look like ?? many thanks!! Li Song _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RJ45 to AUI
Hi, A 10baseT to AUI transceiver is what is seems you want. These are quite readily available and cheap. By using the transceiver at the AUI end you can get about 100 Metres away cheaply. An AUI solution is far more expensive. Teunis Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Sunday, December 24, 2000 at 07:09:57 AM, Circusnuts wrote: Any cabling ideas. I need an RJ45 connection to DB15, for a remote = transceiver... Much appreciated !!! Merry Christmas !!! Phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- www.tasmail.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE practice exams
Hi, I reckon the fear is real. As I have said in the past I have been involved in the telcom, computing and data comms fields for more years than most people reading this have in this world yet I still fear what little I know. I have young guns araound me that come to me for all sorts of help. My job is to be a bit of a mentor. I can help in more ways and with experiences that aren't in books. I fear the exams and bet most of the young guns would do better. But fear I shouldn't as I can see things others miss, my nose for problems in the real world is good. One day I'll have the confidence to pass the CCIE for I feel confidence as well as knowledge must be a real part to it all. I will however enjoy learning more on the way and as old and tired I become I won't have a lot of trouble carrying the knowledge I gain. Take it for what it is worth. Keep Smilin' Teunis Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Saturday, December 23, 2000 at 11:03:48 PM, Jim Healis wrote: Well, at one time I thought that I was knowledgeable. I wouldn't say that about myself tonight. I started taking the Boson practice exams for the CCIE written, and I am realizing just how much I don't know. I have been consistently getting 50-52%. It's like I have hit a plateau in my knowledge. I will say, however, that what I do know is in direct line with the kind of work I have been doing for the past 3 years. Well, I guess I didn't have much of a point to this message... just to take up space, and let people know where I am at in my studies for those that don't care, please refrain from criticism. Thanks! -j _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- www.tasmail.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: help with tacacs authentication -- Now: how did I do this?
All excellent advice. This is a test lab router, but looks like it need some goodies installed! Merry Christmas everyone! Jim -Original Message- From: John Hardman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/23/00 11:01 PM Subject: Re: help with tacacs authentication -- Now: how did I do this? Hi I notice three things in your cut n paste... 1) From the sh ver, you have no flash installed. That is why it is still booting from the ROMs. Better get some flash. 2) There is no DRAM installed either. The router is one of the 2500's that shipped with 2MB on board, of which the router is dividing up into 1MB shared and 1MB for operations. Better get some DRAM too. If this is a non production router, there is nothing wrong with running 72pin parity 70ns or faster. 3) There is a time out in the Con, AUX, and VTY lines, i.e. if there is no activity for apx 5mins the router will discontect/reset the line. This is configurable. HTH -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I ""Croyle, James"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... New problem, same equipment. I have set the conf-reg to 0x2102 by typing: config-reg 0x2102 end write memory reload then the show ver is below, with the conf-reg shown to be correct. Now, the router goes to a stage every 5 minutes after being idle, to this message which is below the sho ver here. R2501(boot)#show ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 10.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWAR E (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1995 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 24-Oct-95 15:46 by mkamson Image text-base: 0x0102, data-base: 0x1000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE R2501 uptime is 1 minute System restarted by power-on Running default software cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision D) with 1020K/1024K bytes of memory. Processor board serial number 03270240 with hardware revision X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. 2 Serial network interfaces. 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. Configuration register is 0x2102 R2501(boot)#show conf Using 418 out of 32762 bytes ! version 10.2 service tcp-small-servers ! hostname R2501 ! enable last-resort succeed enable secret 5 4m2kno enable password nonoubeeswax ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 login ! end R2501(boot)# R2501 con0 is now available Press RETURN to get started. I remember some connections doing this, but I want to make sure this router is ok or I am going to send it back. TIA! Jim Croyle -Original Message- From: John Hardman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/23/00 1:36 PM Subject: Re: help with tacacs authentication -- Now: how did I do this? Hi Sounds like the config-reg is set to 0x2101 as the router has booted from ROM (R2501(boot)#) and not flash. The normal setting on a 2501 is 0x2102. HTH -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I ""Croyle, James"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well all, here is the new configuration of my router. Seems one of those commands did work after all. Can anyone tell me which one it was? Also, I chose the hostname R2501, but the prompt is showing R2501(boot)# My experience is with 4000 routers, 5000, 6500 and 3500 switches, and I want to be sure this prompt I have on the 2501 does not have something to do with a configuration register value that is not set correctly. The new scenario when I log in, is a normal secret password gets me right in. Yes, I will be upgrading the IOS, no need to recommend that one. Sorry so verbose, but I wanted to be clear. ;-) Jim Croyle version 10.2 service tcp-small-servers ! hostname R2501 ! enable last-resort succeed enable secret 5 nopenope enable password nottellingyou ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip route-cache shutdown ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 login ! end _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
CAN anyone give me a cco account to download ios
please mail to me [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks a lot! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
