Re: [7:18833]
Hi I m interested too "Ali Mesdaq" a icrit dans le message : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I don't have the parts but I would love if you kept the list up to date and > when I do get the parts I can follow what you guys did on the list. > > -Original Message- > From: Katsagianni Natasa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: =?iso-8859-7?Q?=C1=D0=3A_how_to_build_a_pix_firewall_out_of_a_? > [7:18761] > > > count me in too.. > > > > ""mike johnson"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > For those who are interested in learning Cisco PIX but > > > do NOT want to spend a lot of money on buying an > > > expensive PIX Firewall, I think I can help you. I > > > have instructions on how to build a PIX firewall by > > > using a PC. In case you didn't know, PIX firewall is > > > essentially a PC with multiple interfaces. I've > > > successfully built several PIX firewall using my old > > > PCs (i.e. pentium 200 MHz processor). Actually, the > > > PIX1 series (obsolete I know) is a PC with Intel > > > EtherExpress Interface cards. However, you must have > > > an account with CCO in order the software and download > > > the software. The rest of the instructions on how to > > > build a PIX firewall using PC is very simple. Anyone > > > interested in learning it, let me know. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! > > Messenger > > > http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19387&t=18833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to Back ISDN [7:19312]
Its certainly possibel in the Uk to run 2 separate BRI links with one D channel and in certain areas it is also possible to use the D channel for free voice calls. The D channel is not linked to a specific B channel and is not 'owned' by a B channel once a link is up. You just have to be careful, about the configuration and be happy tu run a B channel at 100% with no additional capacity Rick Harville wrote: > > This is a fine group and I lurk here often, please help if you > can... > > Does anyone know if its possible to setup two C2503's back to > back over a single ISDN line, assigning one spid to one router > and the other spid to the second router? > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device > with a single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal > a single ISDN line from SW Bell. I would like to split the > spids at the nt1 device and practice my DDR with only one spid > on each router. > > If this is possible, please forward any info you might have on > exactly how to do this? Thanks in advance. > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19388&t=19312 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [7:18833]
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text] Please put my name in your list. I'm interested too. thanks sipitung - Pada Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:28:31 -0400 "Hehdili Nizar" menulis: > Hi > I m interested too > "Ali Mesdaq" a icrit dans le message : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I don't have the parts but I would love if you kept the list up to date > and > > when I do get the parts I can follow what you guys did on the list. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Katsagianni Natasa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:46 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: =?iso-8859-7?Q?=C1=D0=3A_how_to_build_a_pix_firewall_out_of_a_? > > [7:18761] > > > > > > count me in too.. > > > > > > > ""mike johnson"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > For those who are interested in learning Cisco PIX but > > > > do NOT want to spend a lot of money on buying an > > > > expensive PIX Firewall, I think I can help you. I > > > > have instructions on how to build a PIX firewall by > > > > using a PC. In case you didn't know, PIX firewall is > > > > essentially a PC with multiple interfaces. I've > > > > successfully built several PIX firewall using my old > > > > PCs (i.e. pentium 200 MHz processor). Actually, the > > > > PIX1 series (obsolete I know) is a PC with Intel > > > > EtherExpress Interface cards. However, you must have > > > > an account with CCO in order the software and download > > > > the software. The rest of the instructions on how to > > > > build a PIX firewall using PC is very simple. Anyone > > > > interested in learning it, let me know. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > __ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! > > > Messenger > > > > http://im.yahoo.com http://www.eKilat.com emailnya Indonesia! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19389&t=18833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN Switch/Simulator (UK) [7:19240]
If you want a really good simulator that does BRI, PRI & Analog lines then speak to Jo Kemp at Black Box Reading or Suzanne Chapman at Frame Communications - http://www.frame.co.uk You get 2 PRI E1/T1 ports, 8 BRI & 8 Analog, but its compeletly configurable and about the best on the market from Emutel. Cost 6-7K Thompson, Robert D wrote: > > HI All, > > Could any of you let me know where I can purchase an ISDN > switch/simulator > here in the UK , for lab purposes. > > Thanks in advance > > Rob > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19390&t=19240 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for CIPT 3.0 coursebook [7:19338]
There is nothing really specific to 3.0 yet aprtfrom the course material but there are 2 or 3, the best is Cisco Press - Cisco Call Manager Fundamentals. The others are from Syngree/Global knowledge and worth looking at in the shop/library but not worth the money:- Cisco Voice over Ip & Cisco AVVID. both are really just product and architecture overviews, with emphasis on the word overview. which is why I am getting rid of my copies Keith Yam wrote: > > I'm looking for CIPT 3.0 coursebook. Thanks. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19391&t=19338 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394]
Hi all : Can anyone enlighten me whether I can create sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet. thanks in advance regards Jimmy _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19394&t=19394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multihoming BGP with two seperate ISP's via single router [7:19393]
As long as the PIX is 'pointed to' the inside Ethernet interface of the router the PIX should never know about anything past that. Does your PIX point to the router as its DG? Do you have the address space for your BGP AS# configured properly with your ISP's? Does this happen regardless of which ISP is left & which one is removed? ... and when you say the router is routing to the remaining ISP; do you mean you see routes forming or do you mean you can pass packets? > Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Multihoming BGP with two seperate ISP's via single router that [7:19328] Hello, I am multihoming BGP with two seperate ISP's via single router that is connected to a PIX. When I shutdown the one of my serial ports to one of the ISP's you can see the BGP table removing paths. All trace's show that the router starts routing to the ISP that is still active, but all the workstations on the inside of the pix interface can no longer route. I've read where the PIX Firewall does not support the use of BGP, and that I could use RIP between them. Does anyone have an example of this configuration? My searches on this subject within Cisco's knowledgebase have not been very successfull. Or if you can think of another solution for my setup, please let me know. Thank you, * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19393&t=19393 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
Congratulations. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CQS-SNA/IPSS ""Tom Keough"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the > written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home > with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried > to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to > 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want > to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? > > BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and > at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. > Thanks again, > Tom > > Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19396&t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]
I am also planning to start Cisco Security certification and would appreciate if some one can recommend good practice tests. Thank you Art |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Quek, Steven |Sent: Tue, September 11, 2001 5:14 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249] | | |Hi Matthew, | |Thank you very much for your clear & precise advise. |It is really a comfort feeling to have such prompt response. | |With regards |Steven Quek |Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd |Professional Service |Main: 65-786 2288 |DID: 65-580 5176 |Mobile: 65-9797 4526 | | |-Original Message- |From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:22 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249] | | |Hi Steven | |To do the full Cisco Security thing you must take 5 exams as |follows and |preferably in this order |MCNS |Pix Firewall Fundamentals |Pix Firewall Advanced |Cisco Secure VPN |Cisco Intrusion Detection | |The reason for this approach as I always tell my staff & |students is that |the MCNS is comprehensive and gives you a great deal of material in the |other exams, especially the area of IKE, IPsec, ISAKMP etc. | |Books Cisco Press |Managing Cisco Network Security |Designing Network Security |Cisco IOS 12.0 Network Security |Cisco Secure Internet Security Solutions | |There is also the McGraw Hill Implementing Cisco Secure VPN's |but that is so |full of holes and errors I would not bother. There is a book from cisco |Press on VPN's due late 2001 written by Andrew Mason & Terri |Smith and if it |is half as good as Terri is as a VPN course instructor then it |will be well |worth the money. | |The odd one out is CSIDS which requires a deal of Unix |knowledge especially |Solaris, plus some Openview stuff. | |The key to all the exams is understand fully IKE, ISAkmp and |the security |process of why & how. | |If you have not done CCNP or the BCRAN part of CCNPO then i |wopuld recommend |you take a look at it as background to the IOS side of security. | |Good luck and if you need any further specific info email me direct. | |Quek, Steven wrote: |> |> Hi, |> |> This has been a great Cisco study site and enjoy most of it for |> the abundant |> of info that is shared |> on the discussion. |> |> Currently I am preparing for the Cisco Security Track and |> seeking some |> advise. |> I had been to Cisco site and there seems to have 4 exams to |> pass: |> |> 1) MCNS |> 2) Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced (CSPFA) |> 3) Cisco Secure Intrusion Detention System (CSIDS) |> 4) Cisco Secure VPN (CSVPN) |> |> Question is that must I pass the above exams? Need some |> confirmation on this |> |> Next I would appreciate greatly if anyone can recommend me the |> books to read |> up for each of |> the exam. |> |> Thank you very much & have a nice day. |> |> With regards |> Steven Quek |> Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd |> Professional Service |> Main: 65-786 2288 |> DID: 65-580 5176 |> Mobile: 65-9797 4526 | | | | |Report misconduct |and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19395&t=19249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to Back ISDN [7:19312]
Ive been told and it makes perfect it is indeed possible. Let me know how things turn out as your configuration is ver close to what I will be using when the time comes. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Harville Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Back to Back ISDN [7:19312] This is a fine group and I lurk here often, please help if you can... Does anyone know if its possible to setup two C2503's back to back over a single ISDN line, assigning one spid to one router and the other spid to the second router? I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device with a single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a single ISDN line from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 device and practice my DDR with only one spid on each router. If this is possible, please forward any info you might have on exactly how to do this? Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19397&t=19312 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nbar [7:19399]
hi, can any body which cisco image of 1750 have support for http protcol.plz help help me kaushalenders Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19399&t=19399 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
On Jan 31, 11:56am, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote: } At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote: } >While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be } >abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of } >snip } > } >Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they } >will be unable to convert it properly :-) } } CNX numbers really were in Hex! Mine is 01CCDD. ;-) I did a search in the IEEE Standards OUI database for that number, but it isn't listed. I guess that means that you don't exist. :-) Or, we could register it and make a "Priscilla" brand. On second thought, that 01 would indicate it is a funny one, i.e. multicast or locally assigned, wouldn't it? }-- End of excerpt from "Priscilla Oppenheimer" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19400&t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNA/DLSW+ course in Europe? [7:19401]
Hi @, I am bit confussed with course (intructor led) to be taken in order to prepare for CCIE Written on topic of SNA and DLSW. Cisco recommends SNAM. Will this cover DLSW in details.. Above all, it would be great if you can share your personal experience abt the course taken in Europe. Please recommend preferred training company for this course. Regards, Kaushik Khakhar A Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19401&t=19401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394]
You should be able to do this with ISL. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/switch_r/xrswcmd.pdf Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19403&t=19394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Exam [7:19354]
I read the CCIE Sybex book and thought that it was ok. It seems to me that it is more of a summary of all of the topics that you need to know. Here is what I used: Jeff Doyle, Routing TCP/IP, Volume 1 Caslow, Bridging, Routing, and Switching for CCIE's Volume 2 Sybex, CCIE, (Just skimmed over) Halabi, IRA CCIE Written prep book from www.ccbootcamp.com Boson 1, 2, 3 (Some people have mentioned that 1 and 2 where sufficient but I also used 3 and I felt it gave me the extra push I needed) CCIE Written bootcamp by www.ccbootcamp.com This helped me nail down the topics I was uncomfortable withbridging, RIF's yada yada yada. Drop me an email if I can help you more. I just passed last Friday using all of the info above. -Original Message- From: James liu007 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:CCIE Written Exam [7:19354] Hello Group. I am preaparing for CCIE Exam. I will appreciate if you can give me some feedback about Todd Lammle's CCIE book. Moreover, I have lot of CCIE BDs /Exam notes. I would like to trade my resources with you if you have some CCIE written notes / resources for me. Please send me your emails at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks James Liu MCSE, CCNA and CCNP Thanks James Liu MCSE, CCNA and CCNP _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19405&t=19354 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394]
Certainly can. Used often when routing between vlans when the router is external to the switch (non- rsm, msfc, etc)- the old "router on a stick" scenario. >From: "Jimmy Leong" >Reply-To: "Jimmy Leong" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394] >Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 06:47:35 -0400 > >Hi all : > > Can anyone enlighten me whether I can create sub-interface on Ethernet >or FastEthernet. > >thanks in advance > >regards >Jimmy > > >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19402&t=19394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
Yeah, I just concentrated on the questions in front of me and used the full amount of time..so going back wasn't in my playbook unless it would help me with the question in front of me. Jeremy Wright -Original Message- From: Paul Jin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304] Congratulations!! Ability to go back did not help me out either but I guess it is good to know that it is there if you need it. Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19406&t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can i disable tftp server on 6509 [7:19407]
cat os,enable it and disable it. i found a tftpd process on 6509 cat os ,can i disable it thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19407&t=19407 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please look [7:19408]
This is off of the subject..but very important news: http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/nm/20010911/ts/mdf50402.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19408&t=19408 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redistribution OSPF and IGRP [7:19409]
Hi, Can someone enlighten me on the following redistribution scenario? If I will to use "summary-address" what are the statements that I need? Thanks in advance. R1 -R5--R4 R1 running OSPF IP address is 137.20.25.1/24 R5 Running OSPF and IGRP IP address is 137.20.25.5/24 and 137.20.200.17/28 R4 running IGRP IP address is 137.20.200.18/28 The "summary-address" command in R5 is router ospf 10 summary-address 137.20.25.0 255.255.255.240 But when I do a "show ip ospf summary" the metric is very large. I suspect that it is because of this large metric that the route did not get redistributed to the IGRP domain. Please advise. Thanks. R5#show ip ospf summary OSPF Process 10, Summary-address 137.20.25.0/255.255.255.240 Metric 16777215, Type 0, Tag 0 R5# __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19409&t=19409 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Selling my library... [7:19404]
I just wanted to drop the list an email and let everyone know that I'm selling my networking library. All of the information is listed on ebay at the following link: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1464564247 I just thought that someone might find this useful. Thanks! Eric _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19404&t=19404 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: nbar [7:19399]
last I checked, the IOS feature navigator on CCO was not up to date. I.e. was not providing 1750 images as having NBAR capability. Other places on CCO say that NBAR IS supported on the 17xx platform. You may want to call Cisco pre-sales support and ask them - 1-800-553-NETS Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of kaushalenders Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nbar [7:19399] hi, can any body which cisco image of 1750 have support for http protcol.plz help help me kaushalenders Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19410&t=19399 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Appletalk Zone filtering [7:19392]
Dear List, got a little problem in understanding the real difference of using Getzonelist-filter and zip-reply-filter. The way I see it is both are doing exactly the same thing. CID by cisco press stated that zip-reply-filter is recommended to be used over GZL since GZL is not scallable and must be configure on every router. Doesn't the same thing also applies to zip-reply-filter ? Thanks in advance dmateo _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19392&t=19392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redistribution OSPF and IGRP [7:19409]
the topic of IGRP/OSPF redistribution has been covered every which way including Sunday on the CCIE list. If you are not yet subscribed to that list, you can still check the archives http://www.groupstudy.com/cgi-bin/wilma/ccielab FYI, there has been thorough coverage of ALL the practice lab materials there as well. HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of CCIE Loh Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redistribution OSPF and IGRP [7:19409] Hi, Can someone enlighten me on the following redistribution scenario? If I will to use "summary-address" what are the statements that I need? Thanks in advance. R1 -R5--R4 R1 running OSPF IP address is 137.20.25.1/24 R5 Running OSPF and IGRP IP address is 137.20.25.5/24 and 137.20.200.17/28 R4 running IGRP IP address is 137.20.200.18/28 The "summary-address" command in R5 is router ospf 10 summary-address 137.20.25.0 255.255.255.240 But when I do a "show ip ospf summary" the metric is very large. I suspect that it is because of this large metric that the route did not get redistributed to the IGRP domain. Please advise. Thanks. R5#show ip ospf summary OSPF Process 10, Summary-address 137.20.25.0/255.255.255.240 Metric 16777215, Type 0, Tag 0 R5# __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19411&t=19409 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Confederations [7:19332]
Each confederation has it's own AS but the confederation identifier would be the same. For the confederations you can use the private AS numbers 64512-65534. If you have Internet Routing Architectures by Sam Halabi you will have the BGP bible. Dave Joseph Berkeley wrote: > > Hi, > I'm studying for the CCIE written Exam and am stuck on BGP confederations. > >From the material I've read, I am confused about whether to use separate > autonymous > systems numbers for each confederation or separate confederation numbers or > both. > Can some elaborate? > Thanks! > > Joseph Berkeley > Sr. Network Engineer > CCNP > 719-535-4736 > VNET 622-4736 -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19412&t=19332 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Load Balancing using BGP challenge problem [7:19339]
You have no way of influencing via BGP the inbound routes since your using a private AS on one link and default on the other. You need to work with your providers if you wish to have incoming traffic to your network influenced one way or the other. suaveguru wrote: > > hi all > > I have been cracking my head with this load-balancing > issue but still no answer . > > It goes as such > > Customer A has two providers to Internet > > The first provider runs BGP with Customer A and is > only a Receive-Only Inbound link over Satellite > > The second provider is a terrestrial link full-duplex > but the customer does not run BGP with them but purely > a default route > > Question is how can I use BGP to balance the traffic > between the two providers for the Inbound traffic to > the customer. > > I have been contemplating on using AS-PATH prepend but > was not so ready to use it because the customer does > not have their own AS-NUMBER and is using private AS > number provided by the first satellite provider and > the first provider simply strip private AS-Numbers at > their router > > Any form of input will be greatly appreciated > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger > http://im.yahoo.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19413&t=19339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC bo [7:18335]
Hmmm... various expressions spring to mind. But scepticism hasn't always served me well. PLease let us know from whence this so called PC-PIX does cometh ! ""udo konstantin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Woww, > > please count me in to > > Thanks > > Udo > > "Vishal Punjabi" schrieb am 05.09.01: > > Me too > > Vishal > > -Original Message- > > From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] > > > > > > Me to > > > > Samuel ho > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Tonton Rabena > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:25 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335] > > > > count me too.. > > > > ""Richard"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Count me in... > > > > > > > > > ""mike johnson"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > For those who are interested in learning Cisco PIX but > > > > do NOT want to spend a lot of money on buying an > > > > expensive PIX Firewall, I think I can help you. I > > > > have instructions on how to build a PIX firewall by > > > > using a PC. In case you didn't know, PIX firewall is > > > > essentially a PC with multiple interfaces. I've > > > > successfully built several PIX firewall using my old > > > > PCs (i.e. pentium 200 MHz processor). Actually, the > > > > PIX1 series (obsolete I know) is a PC with Intel > > > > EtherExpress Interface cards. However, you must have > > > > an account with CCO in order the software and download > > > > the software. The rest of the instructions on how to > > > > build a PIX firewall using PC is very simple. Anyone > > > > interested in learning it, let me know. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > __ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! > > > Messenger > > > > http://im.yahoo.com > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > __ > Flug.de - 570.000 Nutzer, ein Ziel: der optimale Flug > http://flug.de/sb/?PP=0-5-100-105-12 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19398&t=18335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please look [7:19408]
God Bless all those people! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wright, Jeremy Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please look [7:19408] This is off of the subject..but very important news: http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/nm/20010911/ts/mdf50402.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19416&t=19408 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
I have received several responses sofar expressing a great interest in the solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems to be a very acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody seems to be able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives reveals discussions but no real verification that this is possible. The p If anyone has actually done this please respond as there seems to be a great interest in doing this. Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) interfaces through a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device with a single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a single ISDN line from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 device and practice my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19414&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Load Balancing using BGP challenge problem [7:19339]
what do you mean by this? --- Brian wrote: > Troll Alert > > - Original Message - > From: "Farhan Ahmed" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:30 PM > Subject: RE: Load Balancing using BGP challenge > problem [7:19339] > > > > then u should think abt running 2 static routes > > and forget abt bgp cuz its really doesnt exsist > > > > -Original Message- > > From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:53 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Load Balancing using BGP challenge > problem [7:19339] > > > > > > hi all > > > > I have been cracking my head with this > load-balancing > > issue but still no answer . > > > > > > It goes as such > > > > Customer A has two providers to Internet > > > > The first provider runs BGP with Customer A and is > > only a Receive-Only Inbound link over Satellite > > > > The second provider is a terrestrial link > full-duplex > > but the customer does not run BGP with them but > purely > > a default route > > > > Question is how can I use BGP to balance the > traffic > > between the two providers for the Inbound traffic > to > > the customer. > > > > > > I have been contemplating on using AS-PATH prepend > but > > was not so ready to use it because the customer > does > > not have their own AS-NUMBER and is using private > AS > > number provided by the first satellite provider > and > > the first provider simply strip private AS-Numbers > at > > their router > > > > Any form of input will be greatly appreciated > > > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant > messaging with Yahoo! > Messenger > > http://im.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19418&t=19339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX out of a PC.... [7:19419]
Were the directions ever posted? It almost seems as if the original poster was blowing smoke.. What gives? I mean even the newest pix boxes are still intel based... but that doesn't mean I can use my old pentium as a pix. Anybody have a clue on this? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19419&t=19419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Load Balancing using BGP challenge problem [7:19339]
do you think having them change private AS to public AS number then do AS-PREPEND will be able to do some kind of influencing? regards, suaveguru --- MADMAN wrote: > > You have no way of influencing via BGP the inbound > routes since your > using a private AS on one link and default on the > other. You need to > work with your providers if you wish to have > incoming traffic to your > network influenced one way or the other. > > suaveguru wrote: > > > > hi all > > > > I have been cracking my head with this > load-balancing > > issue but still no answer . > > > > It goes as such > > > > Customer A has two providers to Internet > > > > The first provider runs BGP with Customer A and is > > only a Receive-Only Inbound link over Satellite > > > > The second provider is a terrestrial link > full-duplex > > but the customer does not run BGP with them but > purely > > a default route > > > > Question is how can I use BGP to balance the > traffic > > between the two providers for the Inbound traffic > to > > the customer. > > > > I have been contemplating on using AS-PATH prepend > but > > was not so ready to use it because the customer > does > > not have their own AS-NUMBER and is using private > AS > > number provided by the first satellite provider > and > > the first provider simply strip private AS-Numbers > at > > their router > > > > Any form of input will be greatly appreciated > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant > messaging with Yahoo! Messenger > > http://im.yahoo.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19415&t=19339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394]
You certainly can Dave Jimmy Leong wrote: > > Hi all : > > Can anyone enlighten me whether I can create sub-interface on Ethernet > or FastEthernet. > > thanks in advance > > regards > Jimmy > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19417&t=19394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX out of a PC.... [7:19419]
I have not heard anything. Also, I think these ISA flash cards, if you can get one, cost quite a bit Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19420&t=19419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Load Balancing using BGP challenge problem [7:19339]
A prepend will surely influence the inbound traffic. Is most of your traffic currently arriving via the provider your doing BGP with? What exactly are you seeing?? Why are you even doing BGP with a private AS that is incoming only?? With the info you provided it's hard to give a good answer. dave suaveguru wrote: > > do you think having them change private AS to public > AS number then do AS-PREPEND will be able to do some > kind of influencing? > > regards, > suaveguru > --- MADMAN wrote: > > > > You have no way of influencing via BGP the inbound > > routes since your > > using a private AS on one link and default on the > > other. You need to > > work with your providers if you wish to have > > incoming traffic to your > > network influenced one way or the other. > > > > suaveguru wrote: > > > > > > hi all > > > > > > I have been cracking my head with this > > load-balancing > > > issue but still no answer . > > > > > > It goes as such > > > > > > Customer A has two providers to Internet > > > > > > The first provider runs BGP with Customer A and is > > > only a Receive-Only Inbound link over Satellite > > > > > > The second provider is a terrestrial link > > full-duplex > > > but the customer does not run BGP with them but > > purely > > > a default route > > > > > > Question is how can I use BGP to balance the > > traffic > > > between the two providers for the Inbound traffic > > to > > > the customer. > > > > > > I have been contemplating on using AS-PATH prepend > > but > > > was not so ready to use it because the customer > > does > > > not have their own AS-NUMBER and is using private > > AS > > > number provided by the first satellite provider > > and > > > the first provider simply strip private AS-Numbers > > at > > > their router > > > > > > Any form of input will be greatly appreciated > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant > > messaging with Yahoo! Messenger > > > http://im.yahoo.com > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger > http://im.yahoo.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19421&t=19339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redistribution OSPF and IGRP [7:19409]
you've chosen a very difficult redistribution exercise - redistributing from a smaller to larger prefix. Assuming you know how to redistribute generally (it looks like you're already a CCIE), you know that the summary-address in OSPF summarizes inbound into OSPF, and is advertised by OSPF at an ASBR. Issues that you face: #1. The IGRP process runs on 137.20.0.0 and you probably already know that all network masks on attached IGRP interfaces need to be uniform. You have two diffferent masks on R5 - /24 and /28 for the same classful network. #2. You really don't have any routes to redistribute since the networks are both directly attached to both routing protocols on R5. Consider using another network on the end of R1, perhaps on a loopback interface, to redistribute. However, you run into the issue on R5 of variable length masks, which will cause you grief in redistibution into IGRP #3. Redistribution from a smaller to larger prefix is always difficult - the only two solutions that I can think of are: a. Creating 4 static routes (.0, .64, .128, .192) to null0 with a high administrative distance and redistributing static into IGRP b. Creating 4 summary-addresses in OSPF and doing the same. Good luck, my friend - Original Message - From: "CCIE Loh" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:39 AM Subject: Redistribution OSPF and IGRP [7:19409] > Hi, > Can someone enlighten me on the following > redistribution scenario? If I will to use > "summary-address" what are the statements that I > need? Thanks in advance. > > > R1 -R5--R4 > > R1 > running OSPF > IP address is 137.20.25.1/24 > > R5 > Running OSPF and IGRP > IP address is 137.20.25.5/24 and 137.20.200.17/28 > > R4 > running IGRP > IP address is 137.20.200.18/28 > > > The "summary-address" command in R5 is > > router ospf 10 > summary-address 137.20.25.0 255.255.255.240 > > But when I do a "show ip ospf summary" the metric is > very large. I suspect that it is because of this large > metric that the route did not get redistributed to the > IGRP domain. Please advise. Thanks. > > > R5#show ip ospf summary > > OSPF Process 10, Summary-address > > 137.20.25.0/255.255.255.240 Metric 16777215, Type 0, > Tag 0 > R5# > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger > http://im.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19422&t=19409 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Subject: port and protocol numbers, etc [7:19350]
Howard posted a link about a draft RFC tat was addressing the future of RFC 1700. We had a back and forth exchange about the utility of this RFC, and I made mention of a couple of improvements that could be made. I decided to go ahead and put my two cents worth on the matter and I submitted my comments to the RFC editor. Basically, my comments were in two areas. One was that RFC 1700, and its successor RFCs, need to remain in ASCII format for its portability, particularly in places like wiring closets, etc, where an Internet connection is not available. Additionally, my comments regarding indication of the predominant transport layer protocol in use were also submitted. We need to have a ready identifier that either TCP or UDP is in use for a given application. I actually got a reply from Bob Braden, the RFC editor. He has passed my comments on to IANA for consideration. He took my comments and made an additional proposal which is an outstanding idea. He felt there was nothing that could prevent a daily updated RFC 1700 that could be built with a programming script. In essence, RFC 1700 would remain in ASCII format and stay current every day. I hope that happens. v/r, Paul Werner > Every so often someone asks about port numbers and IP protocol numbers > and > other such numbers and we all moan and groan about the demise of RFC > 1700, > the Assigned Numbers RFC. > > Well, guess what I just discovered? The Internet Assigned Numbers > Authority > (IANA) is still alive and doing well and they keep some nice documents > with > this sort of information. You may want to bookmark this URL: > > http://www.iana.org/numbers.html Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19424&t=19350 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
If memory serves, this has been discussed on the CCIE list, complete with solutions. Try searching the archives at: http://www.groupstudy.com/cgi-bin/wilma/ccielab best wishes Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Harville Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] I have received several responses sofar expressing a great interest in the solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems to be a very acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody seems to be able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives reveals discussions but no real verification that this is possible. The p If anyone has actually done this please respond as there seems to be a great interest in doing this. Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) interfaces through a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device with a single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a single ISDN line from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 device and practice my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19425&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Load Balancing using BGP challenge problem [7:19339]
I think what he means is since they are not using a registered AS the AS that they are using is striped at the provider and your network is seen as originating from your provider not from your private AS. Dave suaveguru wrote: > > what do you mean by this? > --- Brian wrote: > > Troll Alert > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Farhan Ahmed" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:30 PM > > Subject: RE: Load Balancing using BGP challenge > > problem [7:19339] > > > > > > > then u should think abt running 2 static routes > > > and forget abt bgp cuz its really doesnt exsist > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:53 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Load Balancing using BGP challenge > > problem [7:19339] > > > > > > > > > hi all > > > > > > I have been cracking my head with this > > load-balancing > > > issue but still no answer . > > > > > > > > > It goes as such > > > > > > Customer A has two providers to Internet > > > > > > The first provider runs BGP with Customer A and is > > > only a Receive-Only Inbound link over Satellite > > > > > > The second provider is a terrestrial link > > full-duplex > > > but the customer does not run BGP with them but > > purely > > > a default route > > > > > > Question is how can I use BGP to balance the > > traffic > > > between the two providers for the Inbound traffic > > to > > > the customer. > > > > > > > > > I have been contemplating on using AS-PATH prepend > > but > > > was not so ready to use it because the customer > > does > > > not have their own AS-NUMBER and is using private > > AS > > > number provided by the first satellite provider > > and > > > the first provider simply strip private AS-Numbers > > at > > > their router > > > > > > Any form of input will be greatly appreciated > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant > > messaging with Yahoo! > > Messenger > > > http://im.yahoo.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger > http://im.yahoo.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19426&t=19339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
See the following: http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 device with multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several devices to it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not done this but everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > -Original Message- > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > interest in the > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems to be a very > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > seems to be > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > reveals discussions > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > anyone has actually > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > interest in doing this. > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > interfaces through > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device with a > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > single ISDN line > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > device and practice > my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19427&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bad Mask error [7:19428]
Hello all. I've got a situation here. I'm trying to setup a bunch of VLANs on a 6509 in the lab. I've already created the VLANs in the VLAN database. Here is what I want to setup int vlan 10 ip address 10.1.10.0 255.255.255.0 int vlan 20 ip address 10.1.20.0 255.255.255.0 int vlan 30 ip address 10.1.30.0 255.255.255.0 int vlan 40 ip address 10.1.40.0 255.255.255.0 int vlan 50 ip address 10.1.50.0 255.255.255.0 But when I give the ip address command (on VLAN 10) it says: "Bad mask /24 for address 10.1.10.0" I've made sure that ip classless and ip subnet-zero are both enabled. I've searched Cisco's site and it says that all you have to do when you get that error is enable ip subnet-zero, but I've done that and it still rejects. I'm not opposed to using 192.168.x.x for my experiment, but this has become kinda like a mission to understand why this won't work Any input is appreciated. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19428&t=19428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad Mask error [7:19428]
FOLLOW UP: I guess I'm a dummy as I should be putting: ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0 (instead of 10.1.10.0) I sincerely apologize for having a lapse in memory in public like that =) Feel free to laugh and heckle endlessly at my expense =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19429&t=19428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad Mask error [7:19428]
Try using an IP address other than one ending in ".0". You're trying to use a network address on a host. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Michael Williams > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Bad Mask error [7:19428] > > > Hello all. I've got a situation here. I'm trying to setup a > bunch of VLANs > on a 6509 in the lab. I've already created the VLANs in the VLAN > database. > Here is what I want to setup > > int vlan 10 > ip address 10.1.10.0 255.255.255.0 > int vlan 20 > ip address 10.1.20.0 255.255.255.0 > int vlan 30 > ip address 10.1.30.0 255.255.255.0 > int vlan 40 > ip address 10.1.40.0 255.255.255.0 > int vlan 50 > ip address 10.1.50.0 255.255.255.0 > > But when I give the ip address command (on VLAN 10) it says: > > "Bad mask /24 for address 10.1.10.0" > > I've made sure that ip classless and ip subnet-zero are both > enabled. I've > searched Cisco's site and it says that all you have to do when > you get that > error is enable ip subnet-zero, but I've done that and it still rejects. > > I'm not opposed to using 192.168.x.x for my experiment, but this > has become > kinda like a mission to understand why this won't work > > Any input is appreciated. > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19430&t=19428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
Let me give you an analogy as to what you've described. I take a little gizmo that splits my telephone outlet into two outlets (I use one of these for my answering machine and telephone). I can plug two telephones into the gizmo, but can they call each other? Without telephone service, no. But I have my own bus where I can connect multiple telephony devices... > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Daniel Cotts > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > See the following: > http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm > > As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 > device with > multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several > devices to > it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not done this but > everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > > interest in the > > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems to be a very > > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > > seems to be > > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > > reveals discussions > > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > > anyone has actually > > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > > interest in doing this. > > > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > > interfaces through > > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device with a > > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > > single ISDN line > > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > > device and practice > > my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19431&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
Yes, but an ISDN BRI line has two B channels. A POTS line has one channel. Did you visit the URL in my previous post? > -Original Message- > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:36 AM > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Let me give you an analogy as to what you've described. I > take a little > gizmo that splits my telephone outlet into two outlets (I use > one of these > for my answering machine and telephone). I can plug two > telephones into the > gizmo, but can they call each other? Without telephone > service, no. But I > have my own bus where I can connect multiple telephony devices... > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Daniel Cotts > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > See the following: > > http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm > > > > As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 > > device with > > multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several > > devices to > > it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not > done this but > > everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > > > interest in the > > > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems > to be a very > > > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > > > seems to be > > > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > > > reveals discussions > > > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > > > anyone has actually > > > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > > > interest in doing this. > > > > > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > > > interfaces through > > > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > > > > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 > device with a > > > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > > > single ISDN line > > > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > > > device and practice > > > my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19435&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Stock [7:19433]
Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19433&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Firewall [7:19434]
For testing purpose I want to open all the ports of my firewall. The firewall uses software version 4.07 and uses conduit statements. I have tried many statements but nothing works. Can you help? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19434&t=19434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
If you follow Chucks advice the posting listed below is a good guide on how to split B channels Re: ISDN B-channel splitting posted 03/23/2000 Rick Harville wrote: > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > interest in the solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN > line seems to be a very acceptable approach to simulating DDR. > Unfortunately, nobody seems to be able to confirm that it can > be done. A seach of archives reveals discussions but no real > verification that this is possible. The p If anyone has > actually done this please respond as there seems to be a great > interest in doing this. > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > interfaces through a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device > with a > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > single ISDN line > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 device > and practice > my DDR with only one spid on each router. > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19436&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad Mask error [7:19428]
Never say that about yourself. I'm sure many of us recognized that error... because we've done it once or twice ourselves. (-: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Bad Mask error [7:19428] > > > FOLLOW UP: > > I guess I'm a dummy as I should be putting: > > ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0 > > (instead of 10.1.10.0) > > I sincerely apologize for having a lapse in memory in public like that =) > > Feel free to laugh and heckle endlessly at my expense =) > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19437&t=19428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Firewall [7:19434]
If memory serves me correctly, all you need is the following statement: conduit permit ip any any thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco: www.optsys.net ""Pierre-Alex"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > For testing purpose I want to open all the ports of my firewall. > > The firewall uses software version 4.07 and uses conduit statements. > > I have tried many statements but nothing works. > > Can you help? > > Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19438&t=19434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad Mask error [7:19428]
Actually, she's right (guilty)... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19441&t=19428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad Mask error [7:19428]
Mike, try making your addresses .1, ie 10.1.50.1 255.255.255.0 should be the trick... Dave Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19440&t=19428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
Two telephones have two telephony links... and they can be linked together using a bus... but without POTS service, they can't call each other, can they. All the bus does is enable multiple ISDN devices to be able to connect to the ISDN service (which is provided either by a telco or a simulator). And yes, I visited the URL you posted. The ISDN BRI service and ISDN cloud are key components of that excerpt. -- Leigh Anne > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:40 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Yes, but an ISDN BRI line has two B channels. A POTS line has one channel. > Did you visit the URL in my previous post? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:36 AM > > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > Let me give you an analogy as to what you've described. I > > take a little > > gizmo that splits my telephone outlet into two outlets (I use > > one of these > > for my answering machine and telephone). I can plug two > > telephones into the > > gizmo, but can they call each other? Without telephone > > service, no. But I > > have my own bus where I can connect multiple telephony devices... > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Daniel Cotts > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > See the following: > > > http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm > > > > > > As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 > > > device with > > > multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several > > > devices to > > > it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not > > done this but > > > everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > > > > interest in the > > > > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems > > to be a very > > > > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > > > > seems to be > > > > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > > > > reveals discussions > > > > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > > > > anyone has actually > > > > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > > > > interest in doing this. > > > > > > > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > > > > interfaces through > > > > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > > > > > > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 > > device with a > > > > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > > > > single ISDN line > > > > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > > > > device and practice > > > > my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19442&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into corporate spending. that translates into jobs. yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that sarcastically. this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that area are ok. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sparkest pig Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: US Stock [7:19433] Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19443&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Default Behaviour incorrect? [7:19439]
I am using Firewall with software version 4.07 with the configuration below: My clients can ping any address on the Internet but cannot use FTP, Telnet or not even a Web browser Pinging by name works fine! Am I missing something in my configs. I thought by that default the clients would have access to anything on the outside, while no one could access things on the inside. Am I wrong? Pierre-Alex PIX Version 4.0.7to PIX enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted syslog output 20.3 no syslog console interface ethernet outside 10baset interface ethernet inside 10baset ip address inside 10.1.1.10 255.255.255.0 ip address outside 108.145.86.53 255.255.255.0 arp timeout 14400 global 1 108.145.86.52-108.145.86.52 nat 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 age 10 no rip outside passive no rip outside default no rip inside passive no rip inside default route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 108.145.86.1 1 timeout xlate 24:00:00 conn 12:00:00 udp 0:02:00 timeout rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 uauth 0:05:00 no snmp-server location no snmp-server contact mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 : end [OK] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19439&t=19439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Appletalk Zone filtering [7:19392]
When a Macintosh pulls up the Chooser, the Mac sends out a request to get zones. A router responds. You can tell the router not to respond with a GetZoneList filter. When a router learns from another router about a new network, the router asks the other router for the zones associated with that network. You can make sure the router doesn't respond by doing a ZIPReplyFilter. The result is that the network doesn't end up in the routing table because a network without a zone doesn't "exist" in Cisco's implementation. Because the network doesn't end up in the routing table, routers downstream don't ever hear about it. This means that there's no need to do the ZIPReplyFilter on routers downstream. ZIPReplyFilter is more scalable because you don't have to run around to each router that may have Macintoshes nearby and set up the GetZoneList filter. Priscilla At 11:01 AM 9/11/01, Donny Mateo wrote: >Dear List, > >got a little problem in understanding the real difference of using >Getzonelist-filter and zip-reply-filter. The way I see it is both are doing >exactly the same thing. CID by cisco press stated that zip-reply-filter is >recommended to be used over GZL since GZL is not scallable and must be >configure on every router. Doesn't the same thing also applies to >zip-reply-filter ? > >Thanks in advance > >dmateo > >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19432&t=19392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
Can't they share a ISDN line? Doesn't the protocol allow for multiple ST devices assigned different endpoints on the same circuit? Most NT1s have multiple ST connections. I'm only speaking from a theoretical standpoint and could be completely way off base, but couldn't two routers share and single ISDN circuit. A very fair B channel for each? -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] Two telephones have two telephony links... and they can be linked together using a bus... but without POTS service, they can't call each other, can they. All the bus does is enable multiple ISDN devices to be able to connect to the ISDN service (which is provided either by a telco or a simulator). And yes, I visited the URL you posted. The ISDN BRI service and ISDN cloud are key components of that excerpt. -- Leigh Anne > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:40 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Yes, but an ISDN BRI line has two B channels. A POTS line has one channel. > Did you visit the URL in my previous post? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:36 AM > > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > Let me give you an analogy as to what you've described. I > > take a little > > gizmo that splits my telephone outlet into two outlets (I use > > one of these > > for my answering machine and telephone). I can plug two > > telephones into the > > gizmo, but can they call each other? Without telephone > > service, no. But I > > have my own bus where I can connect multiple telephony devices... > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Daniel Cotts > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > See the following: > > > http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm > > > > > > As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 > > > device with > > > multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several > > > devices to > > > it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not > > done this but > > > everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > > > > interest in the > > > > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems > > to be a very > > > > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > > > > seems to be > > > > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > > > > reveals discussions > > > > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > > > > anyone has actually > > > > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > > > > interest in doing this. > > > > > > > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > > > > interfaces through > > > > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > > > > > > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 > > device with a > > > > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > > > > single ISDN line > > > > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > > > > device and practice > > > > my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19444&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19445&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: US Stock [7:19433]
Chuck brings up a good point, one that has been thought of before: back during the height of the arms race, it was theorized that it's a real bad idea to centralize all of your capital. It was thought that maybe all the factories should be spread out evenly, rather than concentrated in any one place - that way, there would be no one place that a nuclear weapon could be detonated that would cause a *major* amount of damage. (Kinda like a Borg spaceship, in a sense). I'm hoping that some of the result of this is that we de-centralize as much as possible - skyscrapers are great if you're hurting for land space, but they're also juicy targets. Hopefully we'll spread our resources out a bit in order to avoid another tragedy like this. BJ - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:25 PM Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number > of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have > probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of > investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things > straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into > corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > > yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually > mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a > survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I > would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that > sarcastically. > > this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak > as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > > hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that > area are ok. > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > sparkest pig > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > > Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of > Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19446&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
what's even worse to think about is all of the couples that work there that leave their children in day care. Here in atlanta, half the city is shut down and our hospitals are on standby just in case... unreal completely unreal. >>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 09/11/01 01:45PM >>> We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19449&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
yes, if you have an ISDN adapter with two S/T ports and a single U port, the U port plugs into the telco line, obviously. Your two routers with their S/T ports plug into the S/T ports of the TA. configure your dialers on the router to use only one spid. call the other. same as if I have my dial up line and my telephone plugged into the back of my TA, kinda like I doe at work. assuming of course that your telco has your ISDN configured this way, but they usually do automatically these days. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] Can't they share a ISDN line? Doesn't the protocol allow for multiple ST devices assigned different endpoints on the same circuit? Most NT1s have multiple ST connections. I'm only speaking from a theoretical standpoint and could be completely way off base, but couldn't two routers share and single ISDN circuit. A very fair B channel for each? -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] Two telephones have two telephony links... and they can be linked together using a bus... but without POTS service, they can't call each other, can they. All the bus does is enable multiple ISDN devices to be able to connect to the ISDN service (which is provided either by a telco or a simulator). And yes, I visited the URL you posted. The ISDN BRI service and ISDN cloud are key components of that excerpt. -- Leigh Anne > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:40 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Yes, but an ISDN BRI line has two B channels. A POTS line has one channel. > Did you visit the URL in my previous post? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:36 AM > > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > Let me give you an analogy as to what you've described. I > > take a little > > gizmo that splits my telephone outlet into two outlets (I use > > one of these > > for my answering machine and telephone). I can plug two > > telephones into the > > gizmo, but can they call each other? Without telephone > > service, no. But I > > have my own bus where I can connect multiple telephony devices... > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Daniel Cotts > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > See the following: > > > http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm > > > > > > As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 > > > device with > > > multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several > > > devices to > > > it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not > > done this but > > > everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > > > > interest in the > > > > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems > > to be a very > > > > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > > > > seems to be > > > > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > > > > reveals discussions > > > > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > > > > anyone has actually > > > > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > > > > interest in doing this. > > > > > > > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > > > > interfaces through > > > > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > > > > > > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 > > device with a > > > > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > > > > single ISDN line > > > > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > > > > device and practice > > > > my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19447&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
my apologies if I appeared unsympathetic. I worked a number of years in the brokerage business, several of those years for Merrill Lynch. I have friends and acquaintances who worked in that part of New York. There are also several folks I have come to respect and appreciate through this and other lists who work in that part of town. I am anxiously awaiting e-mail confirmation of their well being. this tragedy is too great for words. my anger sometimes gets the better of me. there are far more important things to consider at this time. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19451&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Thanks Priscilla, you are %100 correct, these people here are thinking about the economic...when they shoulb be thinking about rebuilding families.they should be thinking about a prayer to God in order to save as many peoples as posible My prayer to those that did not make it in the terror atack God bless america.. -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/11/2001 12:45 PM Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > >--- - > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19450&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Chuck, I know you are not unsympathetic. I just wanted to clear that up. Well, we better all get back to work before this erupts into a major waste of bandwidth! ;-] Peace, Priscilla At 10:58 AM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >my apologies if I appeared unsympathetic. I worked a number of years in the >brokerage business, several of those years for Merrill Lynch. I have friends >and acquaintances who worked in that part of New York. There are also >several folks I have come to respect and appreciate through this and other >lists who work in that part of town. I am anxiously awaiting e-mail >confirmation of their well being. > >this tragedy is too great for words. my anger sometimes gets the better of >me. there are far more important things to consider at this time. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:46 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > >We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families >(if that can even be done??) > >Priscilla > >At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number > >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have > >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms >of > >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things > >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, >into > >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > > > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually > >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a > >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I > >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that > >sarcastically. > > > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak > >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > > > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that > >area are ok. > > > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >sparkest pig > >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of > >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19456&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Sorry Priscilla, but until "adults" realize that your own selfish, buy what you want, do what makes you happy, your needs are alot more important than anyone else's, immature, can't sacrifice my feelings and what I want to do is more important than any spouse or child, attitudes change, it ain't gonna happen. But some of us still remain. :> -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > >--- - > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19452&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: US Stock [7:19433]
Well, since we're off-topic anyway...maybe if God existed, this incredible loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place. Part of rebuilding our society involves rebuilding our economy, so it's worth discussing. As far as life is concerned, I'm donating blood later today, and I've made sure my two friends who live in NYC are okay. What are you doing besides praying? - Original Message - From: "Juan Blanco" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:05 PM Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > Thanks Priscilla, you are %100 correct, these people here are thinking > about the economic...when they shoulb be thinking about rebuilding > families.they should be thinking about a prayer to God in order to save > as many peoples as posible > > My prayer to those that did not make it in the terror atack > > God bless america.. > > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 9/11/2001 12:45 PM > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding > families > (if that can even be done??) > > Priscilla > > At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a > number > >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have > >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in > terms of > >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things > >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, > into > >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > > > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will > eventually > >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a > >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from > scratch, I > >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that > >sarcastically. > > > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as > weak > >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > > > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in > that > >area are ok. > > > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >sparkest pig > >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of > >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > >--- > - > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19455&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: US Stock [7:19433]
The big picture! Is technology really that relevant to todays troubles? Can something like this be good for anyone in any way? By your spelling of Defense, I take it you could be closer to the trouble than I am. I'm a little saddened that this is the sort of question that could spring to mind. Gaz ""sparkest pig"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of > Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19454&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
Yes. The original post indicated that he had an ISDN BRI line from SW Bell. > -Original Message- > From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Can't they share a ISDN line? Doesn't the protocol allow for > multiple ST > devices assigned different endpoints on the same circuit? > Most NT1s have > multiple ST connections. > > I'm only speaking from a theoretical standpoint and could be > completely way > off base, but couldn't two routers share and single ISDN circuit. > > A very fair B channel for each? > > -Original Message- > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Two telephones have two telephony links... and they can be > linked together > using a bus... but without POTS service, they can't call each > other, can > they. All the bus does is enable multiple ISDN devices to be able to > connect to the ISDN service (which is provided either by a telco or a > simulator). > > And yes, I visited the URL you posted. The ISDN BRI service > and ISDN cloud > are key components of that excerpt. > > > -- Leigh Anne > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:40 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > Yes, but an ISDN BRI line has two B channels. A POTS line > has one channel. > > Did you visit the URL in my previous post? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:36 AM > > > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > Let me give you an analogy as to what you've described. I > > > take a little > > > gizmo that splits my telephone outlet into two outlets (I use > > > one of these > > > for my answering machine and telephone). I can plug two > > > telephones into the > > > gizmo, but can they call each other? Without telephone > > > service, no. But I > > > have my own bus where I can connect multiple telephony devices... > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > Daniel Cotts > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > > > > See the following: > > > > http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm > > > > > > > > As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 > > > > device with > > > > multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several > > > > devices to > > > > it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not > > > done this but > > > > everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > > > > > interest in the > > > > > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems > > > to be a very > > > > > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > > > > > seems to be > > > > > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > > > > > reveals discussions > > > > > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > > > > > anyone has actually > > > > > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > > > > > interest in doing this. > > > > > > > > > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > > > > > interfaces through > > > > > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > > > > > > > > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 > > > device with a > > > > > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > > > > > single ISDN line > > > > > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > > > > > device and practice > > > > > my DDR with only one spid on each router. > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19453&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: US Stock [7:19433]
True but a crumbling economy doesn't do families much good either. Not necessary to focus on one aspect of rebuilding in exclusion of the other, America is a great nation and we will overcome this tragedy. Dave Juan Blanco wrote: > > Thanks Priscilla, you are %100 correct, these people here are thinking > about the economic...when they shoulb be thinking about rebuilding > families.they should be thinking about a prayer to God in order to save > as many peoples as posible > > My prayer to those that did not make it in the terror atack > > God bless america.. > > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 9/11/2001 12:45 PM > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding > families > (if that can even be done??) > > Priscilla > > At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a > number > >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have > >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in > terms of > >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things > >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, > into > >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > > > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will > eventually > >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a > >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from > scratch, I > >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that > >sarcastically. > > > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as > weak > >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > > > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in > that > >area are ok. > > > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >sparkest pig > >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of > >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > >--- > - > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19458&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco PIX 515 VPN Configuration ... [7:19457]
Hi all, I try to configured the 2 Cisco 515 PIX for site to site VPN and run in some problem ... it does not passing the traffic for the VPN. I have searched the Cisco site for sample configuration but that does not work or help much or I might looking at the wrong place. If anyone know where I can get more information about the PIX for site-to-site VPN configuration or if you have a "working" configuration that you don't might to send me a copy. Thanks. Bac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19457&t=19457 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
Yes thats correct. I must be missing something cause I have set this up and the second router sh isdn stat shows layer 3 spid invalid... >>> "Daniel Cotts" 09/11/01 01:24PM >>> Yes. The original post indicated that he had an ISDN BRI line from SW Bell. > -Original Message- > From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Can't they share a ISDN line? Doesn't the protocol allow for > multiple ST > devices assigned different endpoints on the same circuit? > Most NT1s have > multiple ST connections. > > I'm only speaking from a theoretical standpoint and could be > completely way > off base, but couldn't two routers share and single ISDN circuit. > > A very fair B channel for each? > > -Original Message- > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Two telephones have two telephony links... and they can be > linked together > using a bus... but without POTS service, they can't call each > other, can > they. All the bus does is enable multiple ISDN devices to be able to > connect to the ISDN service (which is provided either by a telco or a > simulator). > > And yes, I visited the URL you posted. The ISDN BRI service > and ISDN cloud > are key components of that excerpt. > > > -- Leigh Anne > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:40 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > Yes, but an ISDN BRI line has two B channels. A POTS line > has one channel. > > Did you visit the URL in my previous post? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:36 AM > > > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > Let me give you an analogy as to what you've described. I > > > take a little > > > gizmo that splits my telephone outlet into two outlets (I use > > > one of these > > > for my answering machine and telephone). I can plug two > > > telephones into the > > > gizmo, but can they call each other? Without telephone > > > service, no. But I > > > have my own bus where I can connect multiple telephony devices... > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > Daniel Cotts > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > > > > See the following: > > > > http://www.isdnzone.com/info/bri.htm > > > > > > > > As I mentioned in a previous off line post, if you have an NT-1 > > > > device with > > > > multiple connection points (s bus?) then you can connect several > > > > devices to > > > > it. Configure each with its own B channel SPID. I have not > > > done this but > > > > everything that I read indicates that it can be done. Try it. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:15 AM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > > > > > interest in the > > > > > solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN line seems > > > to be a very > > > > > acceptable approach to simulating DDR. Unfortunately, nobody > > > > > seems to be > > > > > able to confirm that it can be done. A seach of archives > > > > > reveals discussions > > > > > but no real verification that this is possible. The p If > > > > > anyone has actually > > > > > done this please respond as there seems to be a great > > > > > interest in doing this. > > > > > > > > > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > > > > > interfaces through > > > > > a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > > > > > > > > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 > > > device with a > > > > > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > > > > > single ISDN line > > > > > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 > > > > > device and practice > > > > > my DDR with only one spid on each router. > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19459&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Absolutely tragic, the biggest fear now is how will the US retaliate to this, this could become very nasty -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 September 2001 18:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19460&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Wow I think that might be a little harsh considering the tone of the post this is referring to. I think we are all worried about the people and families involved. It would be an understatement to call this a catastrophe. However, those buildings were targeted for a reason and it's not being insensitive to consider the economic implications of what has happened. We're not just worried about how this will affect the number of toys we can buy. Damage to the economy translates to loss of jobs. I don't feel that it's insensitive to be concerned about this as well. There are short-term and long-term implications and we need to consider them all. With that said, the economy will withstand and recover from whatever happens today, but the damage to the families involved is irreparable. John >>> "Steve Smith" 9/11/01 12:22:35 PM >>> Sorry Priscilla, but until "adults" realize that your own selfish, buy what you want, do what makes you happy, your needs are alot more important than anyone else's, immature, can't sacrifice my feelings and what I want to do is more important than any spouse or child, attitudes change, it ain't gonna happen. But some of us still remain. :> -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > >--- - > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19461&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX out of a PC.... [7:19419]
I currently have a PIX 1000 that has a bad motherboard\CPU and I am planing to upgrade it the only difference is that the Intel boards have PIX flash code burned in to the BOIS to make a PIX firewall all you should need is the BIOS loader with the PIX code and a flash card. you can buy a new 16 meg flash card for about $800 it comes with 5.1 code already installed. or you can look for someone that has upgraded and willing to sell their old card. I have a source for $780.00 if anyone is interested. >>> "Patrick Ramsey" 09/11/01 08:20AM >>> Were the directions ever posted? It almost seems as if the original poster was blowing smoke.. What gives? I mean even the newest pix boxes are still intel based... but that doesn't mean I can use my old pentium as a pix. Anybody have a clue on this? -Patrick I currently have a PIX 1000 that has a bad motherboard\CPU and I am planing to upgrade itthe only difference is that the Intel boards have PIX flash code burned in to the BOISto make a PIX firewall all you should need is the BIOS loader with the PIX code and a flash card.you can buy a new 16 meg flash card for about $800 it comes with 5.1 code already installed.or you can look for someone that has upgraded and willing to sell their old card.I have a source for $780.00 if anyone is interested. >>> "Patrick Ramsey" 09/11/01 08:20AM >>> Were the directions ever posted? It almost seems as if the original poster was blowing smoke.. What gives? I mean even the newest pix boxes are still intel based... but that doesn't mean I can use my old pentium as a pix. Anybody have a clue on this? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19462&t=19419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deepest sympathy from Europe [7:19463]
...hope you are all OK there... Damn the terrorists :-((( Rita Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19463&t=19463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
May He bless you and yours also B.J. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B.J. Wilson Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] Well, since we're off-topic anyway...maybe if God existed, this incredible loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place. Part of rebuilding our society involves rebuilding our economy, so it's worth discussing. As far as life is concerned, I'm donating blood later today, and I've made sure my two friends who live in NYC are okay. What are you doing besides praying? - Original Message - From: "Juan Blanco" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:05 PM Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > Thanks Priscilla, you are %100 correct, these people here are thinking > about the economic...when they shoulb be thinking about rebuilding > families.they should be thinking about a prayer to God in order to save > as many peoples as posible > > My prayer to those that did not make it in the terror atack > > God bless america.. > > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 9/11/2001 12:45 PM > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding > families > (if that can even be done??) > > Priscilla > > At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a > number > >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have > >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in > terms of > >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things > >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, > into > >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > > > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will > eventually > >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a > >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from > scratch, I > >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that > >sarcastically. > > > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as > weak > >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > > > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in > that > >area are ok. > > > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >sparkest pig > >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of > >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > >--- > - > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19464&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AT&T Telco response to the terrorist attack [7:19466]
Regarding this terrible tragedy, this message from AT&T was circulated to the network staff at my company. I thought it might be of interest to the group dave h Subject: AT&T Code YELLOWURGENT!! All AT&T provisioning and cutovers are cancelled. AT&T has moved to code YELLOW. 2.07 Condition YELLOW: can be implemented when the Government's emergency action procedures have been placed in a "readiness" posture. This alert will be used when a military or political situation deteriorates. It envisions a period of indefinite length and scope. A. All CONDITION GRAY restrictions invoked by the NOC shall be > followed. In addition to those precautions, the following > security measures should be observed as well as any measures > the NOC may add. > > B. All critical locations require 7X24 guard and Network > Operations coverage. This includes 7X24 security guards > stationed outside of all critical building entry points. > > C. All major facility locations (more than 250 T3s) and all > international cable landings, to have either 7X24 guard > coverage or 7X24 Network Operations coverage. > > D. All other locations should have coverage not less than which > is considered "normal". > > E. The Network Operations Center (NOC), the Regional Network > Operations Centers (RNOCs), the Network Control Centers > (NCCs) and the National Electronic System Assistance Centers > (NESACs) will have 7X24 coverage. > > F. For locations with dedicated Government services, e.g. FTS- > 2000, DCTN, etc., ensure that the coverage meets at least > minimum required coverage. > > G. Consideration shall be given to increasing the frequency of > patrols to once each 12 hours to cover critical locations, > if consistent with the safety of the personnel. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19466&t=19466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
OK John, you caught me.in a mood. Apologies to Priscilla. As you stated this is a horrific tragedy. We, the U.S., will over come this as we have multiple times in our history. In the city we are in they are closing malls, schools, DOWNTOWN. It's crappy that people are running around worried that they can not go to the mall tonight. Live is real tuff. I sent that while thinking, what's wrong with people these days, do they not grasp what is REALLY important in life? Friends, family, spirituality, and life are way more important than shopping for shoes. So, sorry group! Don't sweat the economy. We will over come. Hug you kids, spouse, dog or cat when you get home and be glad you can. God Bless. Steve -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] Wow I think that might be a little harsh considering the tone of the post this is referring to. I think we are all worried about the people and families involved. It would be an understatement to call this a catastrophe. However, those buildings were targeted for a reason and it's not being insensitive to consider the economic implications of what has happened. We're not just worried about how this will affect the number of toys we can buy. Damage to the economy translates to loss of jobs. I don't feel that it's insensitive to be concerned about this as well. There are short-term and long-term implications and we need to consider them all. With that said, the economy will withstand and recover from whatever happens today, but the damage to the families involved is irreparable. John >>> "Steve Smith" 9/11/01 12:22:35 PM >>> Sorry Priscilla, but until "adults" realize that your own selfish, buy what you want, do what makes you happy, your needs are alot more important than anyone else's, immature, can't sacrifice my feelings and what I want to do is more important than any spouse or child, attitudes change, it ain't gonna happen. But some of us still remain. :> -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding families (if that can even be done??) Priscilla At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a number >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in terms of >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, into >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will eventually >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from scratch, I >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that >sarcastically. > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as weak >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in that >area are ok. > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >sparkest pig >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > >--- - > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19467&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:-((( [7:19468]
best wishes from austria last week i have configured a serial connection between wtc new york and wtc vienna and today i'm very sad about this terrorist attack hope that most of the people are OK Rene Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19468&t=19468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Default Behaviour incorrect? [7:19439]
I had a similar problem as yours. I don't know if this is the solution for you but I took out the mtu statements and then everything was fine. Thanks, Frank ""Pierre-Alex"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am using Firewall with software version 4.07 with the configuration below: > > My clients can ping any address on the Internet but cannot use FTP, Telnet > or not even a Web browser > > Pinging by name works fine! > > Am I missing something in my configs. I thought by that default the clients > would have access to anything > > on the outside, while no one could access things on the inside. Am I wrong? > > Pierre-Alex > > PIX Version 4.0.7to PIX > enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted > syslog output 20.3 > no syslog console > interface ethernet outside 10baset > interface ethernet inside 10baset > ip address inside 10.1.1.10 255.255.255.0 > ip address outside 108.145.86.53 255.255.255.0 > arp timeout 14400 > global 1 108.145.86.52-108.145.86.52 > nat 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 > age 10 > no rip outside passive > no rip outside default > no rip inside passive > no rip inside default > route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 108.145.86.1 1 > timeout xlate 24:00:00 conn 12:00:00 udp 0:02:00 > timeout rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 uauth 0:05:00 > no snmp-server location > no snmp-server contact > mtu outside 1500 > mtu inside 1500 > : end > [OK] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19465&t=19439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
question RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
If up to 8 devices can share the BRI line do they all get a Terminal Endpoint Identifier or do they request one only when they need to be active? If there are only 62 (64 through 126) I think an ISDN switch would quickly find the TEI pool exhausted. Curious... dave h below is from an ISDN tutorial at www.ralphb.net/ISDN The Layer 2 establishment process is very similar to the X.25 LAP-B setup, if you are familiar with it. The TE (Terminal Endpoint) and the Network initially exchange Receive Ready (RR) frames, listening for someone to initiate a connection The TE sends an Unnumbered Information (UI) frame with a SAPI of 63 (management procedure, query network) and TEI of 127 (broadcast) The Network assigns an available TEI (in the range 64-126) The TE sends a Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode (SABME) frame with a SAPI of 0 (call control, used to initiate a SETUP) and a TEI of the value assigned by the network The network responds with an Unnumbered Acknowledgement (UA), SAPI=0, TEI=assigned. At this point, the connection is ready for a Layer 3 setup. -Original Message- From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] If you follow Chucks advice the posting listed below is a good guide on how to split B channels Re: ISDN B-channel splitting posted 03/23/2000 Rick Harville wrote: > > I have received several responses sofar expressing a great > interest in the solution. Back to back ISDN over a single ISDN > line seems to be a very acceptable approach to simulating DDR. > Unfortunately, nobody seems to be able to confirm that it can > be done. A seach of archives reveals discussions but no real > verification that this is possible. The p If anyone has > actually done this please respond as there seems to be a great > interest in doing this. > > Once again, the question is, can you connect two BRI (st) > interfaces through a NT1 device using only a single ISDN line? > > I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device > with a > single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a > single ISDN line > from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 device > and practice > my DDR with only one spid on each router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19469&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: US Stock [7:19433]
I know this is off-topic and long, but I'll give it a shot anyway... Hello all, and much respect to everyone on this list. This is my first time writing to this list (as far as I can remember), although I have observed it for awhile. Most topics seem to be out of my Cisco range, but I do enjoy the information that crosses the list and I do respect everyone's opinion as their own. Terrible tragedies have been suffered today, and many lives are now changed forever. As Priscilla mentioned, the damage to families is irreparable. However, to think that "if God existed, this incredible loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place", is to say that that the devil does not exist. God is very real and He does exist. Unfortunately, the devil is very real also, and he does exist. Many people think that the devil is a mythical figure that has nothing to do with current events, so they equate God with all of the good and the bad things. The fact is, that God does love us all, and it is not his desire that anyone of us should perish, but we all have an enemy, and that is the devil. Every opportunity he gets, he seeks to devour. God works through his people and He is patient. Tragedies do occur, but the blame should go to the devil, not God. When we pray, our prayers do make a difference as God hears our prayers. The "we" that I'm talking about is those that believe on His son, Jesus Christ. There is a spiritual war going on that must not be overlooked. Todays events are part of this war. The bible says it all. These are the "end times" that we are in. It is my hope that these tragedies will lead the rest of us to realize that we do need a saviour, and He is Jesus Christ. Please check Romans 14:10, 12/Ephesians 2:8,9/ Romans 3:23/Romans 6:23/ and Romans 10:9,10. Also, the book of Revelations tells much about the end times (which we've been in for quite some time). Prayer, along with using all available opportunities to help (like donating blood), goes a long way. Thank you. Craig. - Original Message - From: B.J. Wilson To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:27 PM Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] > Well, since we're off-topic anyway...maybe if God existed, this incredible > loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place. Part of rebuilding > our society involves rebuilding our economy, so it's worth discussing. As > far as life is concerned, I'm donating blood later today, and I've made sure > my two friends who live in NYC are okay. What are you doing besides > praying? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Juan Blanco" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:05 PM > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > Thanks Priscilla, you are %100 correct, these people here are thinking > > about the economic...when they shoulb be thinking about rebuilding > > families.they should be thinking about a prayer to God in order to > save > > as many peoples as posible > > > > My prayer to those that did not make it in the terror atack > > > > God bless america.. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 9/11/2001 12:45 PM > > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding > > families > > (if that can even be done??) > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > > >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a > > number > > >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have > > >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in > > terms of > > >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things > > >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, > > into > > >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > > > > > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will > > eventually > > >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a > > >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from > > scratch, I > > >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that > > >sarcastically. > > > > > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as > > weak > > >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > > > > > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in > > that > > >area are ok. > > > > > >Chuck > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > >sparkest pig > > >Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > > > > > >Would the technology or other industry go down and the Department of > > >Defense funding go up? would this be good to us, the Cisco geeks? > > > > > >--- > > - > > > > > >Get your FREE download of
Routing and Bridging [7:19472]
Hello all - I need to bridge E1 to S1 on a router, and route E0 to S0, how can I do this? This router config is the same on each end. END A END B E0-S0 -- S0-E0 E1-S1 -- S1-E1 (Bridge) Thanks -Russ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19472&t=19472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mail servers behind the pix [7:19381]
You will need to disable the SMTP fixup protocol. It doesn't work with Exchange. MikeN ""fmxiao"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi all, > > how to configurate the pix, so that a mail server (NT 4 w/ Exchange) can > communicate with other mail servers on the Internet behind the pix? > > thx. adv. > roy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19473&t=19381 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414]
Can you post your router configs? Also can you provide the output of a show isdn stat for each router? > -Original Message- > From: Rick Harville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Back to back ISDN [7:19414] > > > Yes thats correct. I must be missing something cause I have > set this up and > the second router sh isdn stat shows layer 3 spid invalid... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19474&t=19414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco PIX 515 VPN Configuration ... [7:19457]
Here is a working sample that I have used. PIX config PIX to PIX using 5.1.2 Site #1 access-list 101 permit ip 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0 sysopt connection permit-ipsec NAT (inside) 0 access-list 101 crypto ipsec transform-set strong esp-des esp-sha-hmac crypto map remote 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map remote 10 match address 101 crypto map remote 10 set peer 10.5.1.2 crypto map remote 10 set transform-set strong crypto map remote interface outside isakmp enable outside isakmp key know1234 address 10.5.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 isakmp policy 5 authentication pre-share isakmp policy 5 encryption des isakmp policy 5 hash sha isakmp policy 5 group 1 isakmp policy 5 lifetime 86400 Site 2 access-list 101 permit ip 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 sysopt connection permit-ipsec NAT (inside) 0 access-list 101 crypto ipsec transform-set strong esp-des esp-sha-hmac crypto map remote 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map remote 10 match address 101 crypto map remote 10 set peer 10.1.2.1 crypto map remote 10 set transform-set strong crypto map remote interface outside isakmp enable outside isakmp key know1234 address 10.1.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 isakmp policy 5 authentication pre-share isakmp policy 5 encryption des isakmp policy 5 hash sha isakmp policy 5 group 1 isakmp policy 5 lifetime 86400 The only trick is to make sure that the ACL's used to specify interesting traffic are a mirror of each other. MikeN ""Bac Nguyen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > I try to configured the 2 Cisco 515 PIX for site to site VPN and run in some > problem ... it does not passing the traffic for the VPN. I have searched the > Cisco site for sample configuration but that does not work or help much or I > might looking at the wrong place. > > If anyone know where I can get more information about the PIX for > site-to-site VPN configuration or if you have a "working" configuration that > you don't might to send me a copy. Thanks. > > Bac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19475&t=19457 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deepest sympathy from Europe [7:19463]
Thanks ""Dr Rita Puzmanova"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ...hope you are all OK there... > > Damn the terrorists :-((( > > Rita Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19476&t=19463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mail servers behind the pix [7:19381]
Wasn't this fixed with the new code? -Patrick >>> "MikeN" 09/11/01 04:34PM >>> You will need to disable the SMTP fixup protocol. It doesn't work with Exchange. MikeN ""fmxiao"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi all, > > how to configurate the pix, so that a mail server (NT 4 w/ Exchange) can > communicate with other mail servers on the Internet behind the pix? > > thx. adv. > roy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19477&t=19381 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dial Backup Routing??? [7:19478]
Hello group! I have a network that is set up in a hub and spoke arrangement. We have 10 remote offices with 3-5 users at each location, and 1 data center which controls all internet access, file and printer sharing and email services. Our teleco arrangemet is as follows. Data Center: 1 Frame relay T1 with subinterfaces to 7 remote offices at speeds of 56K and 128K. 1 AT&T T1 that goes into a channel bank where the other 3 remote sites get 56K lines and then the rest of the channels of the T1 are dedicated to voice. Hardware Cisco 2522 Remote Sites:56k or 128k data circuits either frame or Point to Point. Hardware is Cisco 1600 My Question!!!: Is there a way to have a modem connection on the 1600's that dials up the 2522 when the circuit goes down? We currently have no backup for our data connection and I think that this is a major problem. (Circuits can go down and with no communication to the ERP system, phones ring off the hook) Cost of course is a major issue, as funding is currently very limited. Possibly a $2500 budget? We do have phone lines into the remote sites that could be used to dial out from. I am looking for a solution that would maybe use modems on the 1600's and some sort of a modem pool or modem bank to receive all the connections in the case of a major outage at the data center on the 2522. If this is possible, please let me know how you would do it!! Also if you have any reccomendations for modem banks or pools that would send the authentication requests to our 2522 that would be great! Thanks in advance for your replies.. Andy Davidson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19478&t=19478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing and Bridging [7:19472]
int e0 ip address X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y int e1 bridge-group 1 int s0 ip address X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y int s1 bridge-group 1 bridge 1 protocol ieee (or dec) -Original Message- From: Russ Kreigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing and Bridging [7:19472] Hello all - I need to bridge E1 to S1 on a router, and route E0 to S0, how can I do this? This router config is the same on each end. END A END B E0-S0 -- S0-E0 E1-S1 -- S1-E1 (Bridge) Thanks -Russ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19479&t=19472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mail servers behind the pix [7:19381]
I think it was. I am using smtp fixup with an nt email server behind a pix. -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mail servers behind the pix [7:19381] Wasn't this fixed with the new code? -Patrick >>> "MikeN" 09/11/01 04:34PM >>> You will need to disable the SMTP fixup protocol. It doesn't work with Exchange. MikeN ""fmxiao"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi all, > > how to configurate the pix, so that a mail server (NT 4 w/ Exchange) can > communicate with other mail servers on the Internet behind the pix? > > thx. adv. > roy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19481&t=19381 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
pushing religion is pushing the limits of acceptable OT converstaion IMHO My deepest sympathy to those affected by this series of atrocities. A few weeks ago, a car bomb went off just up the road from my place (West London), and I thought that was a wake up call the scale of this disaster is just incomprehensible. Symon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Richardson Sent: 11 September 2001 21:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] I know this is off-topic and long, but I'll give it a shot anyway... Hello all, and much respect to everyone on this list. This is my first time writing to this list (as far as I can remember), although I have observed it for awhile. Most topics seem to be out of my Cisco range, but I do enjoy the information that crosses the list and I do respect everyone's opinion as their own. Terrible tragedies have been suffered today, and many lives are now changed forever. As Priscilla mentioned, the damage to families is irreparable. However, to think that "if God existed, this incredible loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place", is to say that that the devil does not exist. God is very real and He does exist. Unfortunately, the devil is very real also, and he does exist. Many people think that the devil is a mythical figure that has nothing to do with current events, so they equate God with all of the good and the bad things. The fact is, that God does love us all, and it is not his desire that anyone of us should perish, but we all have an enemy, and that is the devil. Every opportunity he gets, he seeks to devour. God works through his people and He is patient. Tragedies do occur, but the blame should go to the devil, not God. When we pray, our prayers do make a difference as God hears our prayers. The "we" that I'm talking about is those that believe on His son, Jesus Christ. There is a spiritual war going on that must not be overlooked. Todays events are part of this war. The bible says it all. These are the "end times" that we are in. It is my hope that these tragedies will lead the rest of us to realize that we do need a saviour, and He is Jesus Christ. Please check Romans 14:10, 12/Ephesians 2:8,9/ Romans 3:23/Romans 6:23/ and Romans 10:9,10. Also, the book of Revelations tells much about the end times (which we've been in for quite some time). Prayer, along with using all available opportunities to help (like donating blood), goes a long way. Thank you. Craig. - Original Message - From: B.J. Wilson To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:27 PM Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] > Well, since we're off-topic anyway...maybe if God existed, this incredible > loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place. Part of rebuilding > our society involves rebuilding our economy, so it's worth discussing. As > far as life is concerned, I'm donating blood later today, and I've made sure > my two friends who live in NYC are okay. What are you doing besides > praying? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Juan Blanco" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:05 PM > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > Thanks Priscilla, you are %100 correct, these people here are thinking > > about the economic...when they shoulb be thinking about rebuilding > > families.they should be thinking about a prayer to God in order to > save > > as many peoples as posible > > > > My prayer to those that did not make it in the terror atack > > > > God bless america.. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 9/11/2001 12:45 PM > > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > We're talking about rebuilding the economy? How about rebuilding > > families > > (if that can even be done??) > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 01:25 PM 9/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > > >since you asked - this is real bad news for the economy. there are a > > number > > >of major financial firms located in the twin towers, all of whom have > > >probably lost key people. These are firms that drive the economy in > > terms of > > >investment and investment capital. how long will it take to get things > > >straight? you will see spillovers into the stock market, into planning, > > into > > >corporate spending. that translates into jobs. > > > > > >yes there will be rebuilding that must take place, and this will > > eventually > > >mean an economic boost. but maybe not for New York City. If I were a > > >survivor of one of these firms, and had the chance to build from > > scratch, I > > >would seriously consider relocating to Kansas. And I do not say that > > >sarcastically. > > > > > >this tragedy spills way beyond what one might think. In an economy as > > weak > > >as ours is now, this is real bad news indeed. > > > > > >hoping any number of friends and personal acquaintances who work in > > that > > >area are ok. > > > > > >C
Re: PIX Firewall [7:19434]
conduit permit ip any any >From: "Pierre-Alex" >Reply-To: "Pierre-Alex" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: PIX Firewall [7:19434] >Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:57:14 -0400 > >For testing purpose I want to open all the ports of my firewall. > >The firewall uses software version 4.07 and uses conduit statements. > >I have tried many statements but nothing works. > >Can you help? > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19483&t=19434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dial Backup Routing??? [7:19478]
You sure can, this is a good URL showing how to conifigure your aux ports and set up the chat scripts that make it happen. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/471/aux-aux-watch.html Dave Andy Davidson wrote: > > Hello group! > I have a network that is set up in a hub and spoke arrangement. We have 10 > remote offices with 3-5 users at each location, and 1 data center which > controls all internet access, file and printer sharing and email services. > Our teleco arrangemet is as follows. > > Data Center: 1 Frame relay T1 with subinterfaces to 7 remote offices at > speeds of 56K and 128K. >1 AT&T T1 that goes into a channel bank where the > other 3 remote sites get 56K lines and then the rest of the channels of the > T1 are dedicated to voice. > Hardware Cisco 2522 > > Remote Sites:56k or 128k data circuits either frame or Point to Point. > Hardware is Cisco 1600 > > My Question!!!: Is there a way to have a modem connection on the 1600's that > dials up the 2522 when the circuit goes down? We currently have no backup > for our data connection and I think that this is a major problem. (Circuits > can go down and with no communication to the ERP system, phones ring off > the hook) Cost of course is a major issue, as funding is currently very > limited. Possibly a $2500 budget? > > We do have phone lines into the remote sites that could be used to dial out > from. > > I am looking for a solution that would maybe use modems on the 1600's and > some sort of a modem pool or modem bank to receive all the connections in > the case of a major outage at the data center on the 2522. > > If this is possible, please let me know how you would do it!! Also if you > have any reccomendations for modem banks or pools that would send the > authentication requests to our 2522 that would be great! > > Thanks in advance for your replies.. > > Andy Davidson -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19484&t=19478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: :-((( [7:19468]
Thank You Rene, and also Rita. I am in shock. There are many people on this list who worked in those buildings, and many more with friends and family there. I just heard from my first friend who was there and made it home. I'm sitting here watching my email and waiting for my phone to ring. Besides my friends and associates who are there, I can't help to think of the thousands and thousands of faces I've past in those hallways, escalators, offices, etc. -Erik Mintz Rene Schmid writes: > best wishes from austria > > last week i have configured a serial connection between wtc new york and wtc > vienna and today i'm very sad about this terrorist attack > > hope that most of the people are OK > > Rene Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19485&t=19468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing and Bridging [7:19472]
ME thinks Russ wants to bridge and route the same protocol in which case that won't work. Check IRB, integrated routing and bridging. I have used IRB to bridge IP/IPX from one interface to another in the same router but never in the scenerio you describe. Dave Jim Brown wrote: > > int e0 > ip address X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y > > int e1 > bridge-group 1 > > int s0 > ip address X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y > > int s1 > bridge-group 1 > > bridge 1 protocol ieee (or dec) > > -Original Message- > From: Russ Kreigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Routing and Bridging [7:19472] > > Hello all - > > I need to bridge E1 to S1 on a router, and route E0 to S0, how can I do > this? This router config is the same on each end. > > END A END B > > E0-S0 -- S0-E0 > E1-S1 -- S1-E1 (Bridge) > > Thanks > > -Russ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19487&t=19472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPexpert.net [7:19486]
Hi all, I am interested in getting the IPexpert lab exercises? Anybody who is willing to give can send me a mail and make a deal... Thanks Rajesh [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of pikumar.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19486&t=19486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP on virtual interfaces [7:19488]
How does the Cisco MIB account for SNMP polling on virtual interfaces? I tried to find some general information regarding SNMP + virtual interfaces on Cisco's site, but was unable to find any. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Sean Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19488&t=19488 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARPing - is this right? [7:19489]
I'm trying to describe the ARPing process. It something I've always taken for granted, but now I'm trying to actually write it down. Let me know your thoughts... When a workstation attempts to communicate with an IP address it follows this process: IP devices maintain an ARP cache that store any recently acquired IP-to-MAC address combinations. If the appropriate address is there, communication is established. If the IP address is not in the local ARP table, the source host will send an ARP request packet containing the Network-layer address, seeking to be resolve it to a MAC-layer address for the desired destination. All hosts on the network receive this request, but only the host with the specified network address will respond. If present and functioning, the host with the specified address responds with an ARP Reply packet containing its MAC-layer address. The originating device receives the ARP Reply packet, stores the MAC/IP address combination its ARP cache for future use, and begins exchanging packets with the host. If the host is not on the local network, the router on the local network will look up the network address in its route table and if it finds a match, it will return the MAC address of its local interface to the ARP-ing source station. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19489&t=19489 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deepest sympathy from Europe [7:19463]
As an Ex-Police Officer who had to put up with the IRA scum bombing us in Great Britain over the years can I express my deepest sympathy for those who have lost ones and those who's lives will be forever changed. I too hope you are all OK. Karl - Original Message - From: "Francisco deAmorim" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:49 PM Subject: Re: Deepest sympathy from Europe [7:19463] > Thanks > > > ""Dr Rita Puzmanova"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ...hope you are all OK there... > > > > Damn the terrorists :-((( > > > > Rita Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19490&t=19463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
