Re: OT - My Employer's VPN! I'm so happy!! [7:30272]
You do indeed hope that it's one of their VPN Concentrators... I've set up three of those things for three different clients in the past three weeks. They are super sweet! My favorite installation so far was integrated into the networks OSPF routing domain, and utilized SecureID/Radius for user authentication. I also got to dink around with one of the 3002 Hardware clients, which basically provides the VPN connection for an entire remote location (Small LAN... 8-ish users). You should not be some random beta tester though, Chuck... You ought to be on the head-end side. What is your company thinking? - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:08 PM Subject: Off Topic - My Employer's VPN! I'm so happy!! [7:30267] > Off topic VPN comment. My employer is FINALLY moving to VPN access to our > company network. This instead of that crappy ISDN RAS telco solution they've > been running for years. I'm so lucky to have been chosen as one of the beta > testers. Probably because I've been complaining so loud for so long. > > In any case, our laptops are Window NT 4.0 and W2K. the client is the Cisco > secure client, and because we are a Cisco partner, I presume that we are > connecting via one of another of the Cisco VPN products. One can hope it is > a CVPN3xxx box, but with my employer, you never can tell ;-> > > In any case, the scripted installation worked like a charm and I am happy as > a clam doing company work via a much faster connection. In my job I often > have to move some very large Excel and Visio files from here to there. Not > to mention the kinds of things I have to download from vendor sites for > study and meeting preparation. > > So yes VPN stuff can work, can be easy ( recognizing the front end > preparation that obviously took place ) and so far, the Cisco client has > been flawless to work with. Knock on my wooden head :-> > > I know there are a lot of people from my company who read this list. All I > can say is I hope you keep the pressure up on your managers. this is so much > better! > > Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30272&t=30272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will One Of Your New Year's Resolutions Be To Save Money? [7:30273]
If you answered yes to the above question, we can help. PAY ONLY - 4.9 CENTS PER MINUTE! On All Interstate Long Distance Phone Calls. This flat rate applies anywhere in the Continental US Same low rates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. No Fees In Bound 800 Numbers Available. Rates are the same - 4.9 CPM on interstate calls Competitive Intrastate Rates Low International Rates NO Sign-Up Fees NO Monthly Minimums NO Monthly Fees NO Long Term Contract All calls are billed in 6 second increments. This is NOT a dial around program, You dial 1+ just as with regular phone calls. On-Line Sign-Up Available. View billing details on-line in addition to standard paper statement. Pay monthly bill by check or by credit card. To view more details, including a link to our free secure on-line sign-up page, please click on the following link: http://www.accxx-telecom.net/ Click below to be removed: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=REMOVE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30273&t=30273 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: certification salary posting [7:30237]
As usual these average salaries are totally inflated and unrealistic!! Microsoft and Cisco ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30274&t=30237 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
Where I work we have two circuits to the Internet with two different providers. We configure GRE tunnels to each with the endpoints being two routers at the main office with feeds from each of those two providers. We then run EIGRP across the GRE tunnels, which (1) gives us load balancing and (2) provides failover typically between 8-14 seconds when one tunnel drops due to any problems across that pathway. Our users never know when a circuit goes down or when we turn one down for maintenance. Very simple to do and simple to maintain. Slava Kosoy wrote: > > Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over the the > Internet routers? > IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. > > Thank you. -- James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP Sr. Network/Security Engineer "non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30275&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Practical Studies by Cisco Press [7:30243]
Try www.bamm.com! - Original Message - From: "juno vtv" To: Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 6:11 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Practical Studies by Cisco Press [7:30243] > Thanks, > > I found it on different sites but was hoping I can find the best price. I > usually buy from bookpool but they do not have any. So if anybody can tell > me where I can get the best price, I would appreciate it. Thanks! > > -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30276&t=30243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: certification salary posting [7:30237]
The TX ones are WAY off according to classifieds & the companies I've worked for in the past. Instead of $70K+ for MCSE+I it's more like $35K+ unless you get lucky & find a large enough company that doesn't know any better ;) - Original Message - From: c1sc0k1d To: Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:32 PM Subject: Re: certification salary posting [7:30237] > I think it's been hashed out on this list before that this survey is pretty > ridiculous. Some of the numbers might be slightly representative of the big > cities, others are a laugh. A search of the archive should produce the > various arguements. > > The k1d > > > > > ""sam sneed"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > group, > > > > I found this link on a microsoft site. It mainly analyzes the the salaries > > of people holding Microsoft certifications. The applicable part is on the > > 3rd page of the report which lists the estimated salaries of all different > > cert's including CCNA,CCNP, CCIE. > > > > http://mcpmag.com/salarysurveys/ > > > > I'm not supporting the claims on this site. I'm posting it here because > > people always ask the list for this info so i hope noone comes after me > for > > posting this. I currently hold MCSE and CCNA with 2.5 years experience and > > don't make what the list says my average would be, and this is working in > > NYC where they pay very well. > > > > food for thought > > > > sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30277&t=30237 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LAN sub-interface routing [7:30225]
If you are going to a Catalyst you can set up the interface as either an 802.1Q or ISL trunk and put as many VLANs across it as you like. Instead of having to do secondary addresses you simply create subinterfaces. I did this with my 1751 at home trunking to my 2924XL using 802.1Q encapsulation (1751 doesn't support ISL) and it works like a charm. John Mairs wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a 2501 (one ethernet interface) and I wanted to > route over that interface by setting up two > sub-interfaces. I can't assign an address because it > replies with > > "configuring IP routing on a LLAN subinterface is only > allowed if that subinterface is already configured as > part of an IEEE 802.10 or ISL vLAN." > > what will I need to do (specifically if you can) to > route over a single E0 interface? > > thanks > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > http://greetings.yahoo.com -- James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP Sr. Network/Security Engineer "non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30278&t=30225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LAN sub-interface routing [7:30225]
Also using VLAN trunking you can place access lists on the various subinterfaces, as well as NAT... John Mairs wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a 2501 (one ethernet interface) and I wanted to > route over that interface by setting up two > sub-interfaces. I can't assign an address because it > replies with > > "configuring IP routing on a LLAN subinterface is only > allowed if that subinterface is already configured as > part of an IEEE 802.10 or ISL vLAN." > > what will I need to do (specifically if you can) to > route over a single E0 interface? > > thanks > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > http://greetings.yahoo.com -- James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP Sr. Network/Security Engineer "non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30279&t=30225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Will One Of Your New Year's Resolutions Be To Save Money? [7:30280]
ActuallyI think people on this list resolve to SPEND THOUSANDS ON ROUTERS...not save pennies ;) BTW, Paul, I checked out the mail server & it's not relaying (in case that was in your logs). Allen - Original Message - From: Long Distance Savings To: Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:13 PM Subject: Will One Of Your New Year's Resolutions Be To Save Money? [7:30273] > If you answered yes to the above question, > we can help. > > PAY ONLY - 4.9 CENTS PER MINUTE! > On All Interstate Long Distance Phone Calls. > > This flat rate applies anywhere in the Continental US > Same low rates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. > > No Fees In Bound 800 Numbers Available. > Rates are the same - 4.9 CPM on interstate calls > > Competitive Intrastate Rates > Low International Rates > > NO Sign-Up Fees > NO Monthly Minimums > NO Monthly Fees > NO Long Term Contract > All calls are billed in 6 second increments. > > This is NOT a dial around program, You > dial 1+ just as with regular phone calls. > > On-Line Sign-Up Available. > View billing details on-line in addition to > standard paper statement. > > Pay monthly bill by check or by credit card. > > To view more details, including a link to > our free secure on-line sign-up page, please > click on the following link: > > http://www.accxx-telecom.net/ > > > Click below to be removed: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=REMOVE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30280&t=30280 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Will One Of Your New Year's Resolutions Be To Save [7:30273]
Long Distance Savings wrote: > > If you answered yes to the above question, > we can help. > > PAY ONLY - 4.9 CENTS PER MINUTE! > On All Interstate Long Distance Phone Calls. > > This flat rate applies anywhere in the Continental US > Same low rates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. > > No Fees In Bound 800 Numbers Available. > Rates are the same - 4.9 CPM on interstate calls > > Competitive Intrastate Rates > Low International Rates > > NO Sign-Up Fees > NO Monthly Minimums > NO Monthly Fees > NO Long Term Contract > All calls are billed in 6 second increments. > > This is NOT a dial around program, You > dial 1+ just as with regular phone calls. > > On-Line Sign-Up Available. > View billing details on-line in addition to > standard paper statement. > > Pay monthly bill by check or by credit card. > > To view more details, including a link to > our free secure on-line sign-up page, please > click on the following link: > > http://www.accxx-telecom.net/ > > > Click below to be removed: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=REMOVE > > Actually I find it cheaper by using two cans and a string. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30281&t=30273 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Practical Studies by Cisco Press [7:30243]
CiscoPress sent me a copy a couple weeks ago to do a review on. I go through it and let you guys know what I think. I'll try and be as objective as possible. :) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html ""juno vtv"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I hope that we can get someone to do an in-depth review of the book and let > us know if it's worth it to add to the library :-) > > -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30271&t=30243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF into iBGP with Sync [7:30126]
> the first thing that comes to mind is that OSPF is the only other routing > protocol where RID is an inherant part of the structure and the process. > > as to why this becomes an issue, since RIDs can change based upon > reconfigurations and reloads and process clearing, I can see the code > getting confused. add a loopback. clear the ospf process, the RID changes, > but does not change for BGP because the process is stable. or visa versa. > this is starting to tell me that maybe there is a RID routine in the IOS > code that both BGP and OSPF reference when starting up. > > write it off as "cronkite" because "that's the way it is"? not a bug, but a > feature? > the 'feature' is a pretty tricky deal. what the sync 'feature' required is the RID for the OSPF route match the RID of the BGP route. John came up with the solution, and it worked. The redistribution point also plays a key role - when redistributing OSPF into BGP, it worked best when done at a BGP router that was sync'ed. The additional complication was a route reflector preventing the real full iBGP mesh. It is a show-stopper if you don't get that match and try to get unsynced iBGP routes advertised to an eBGP neighbor. My conclusion: The additional sync requirement of matching OSPF RIDs (instead of just the routing table) is a real pain in the butt. > Chuck > > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > We discovered something on the CCIE list recently and I'm > > wondering if anyone might be able to explain the reasoning > > behing this behavior. > > > > BGP synchronization rules require that if an iBGP peer is to > > advertise a route learned via iBGP, it must have that prefix > > *and* the next hop for that route in the routing table already. > > > > An interesting added complexity to this occurs if your IGP is > > OSPF. If the router in question has learned these prefixes via > > OSPF, then the advertising router ID in the OSPF database must > > match the router ID of the iBGP peer that advertised the route. > > > > Has this behavior caused any problems for any of you? Do you > > know why the synchronization rules have a special case for OSPF > > and not other routing protocols? > > > > I was working with someone else on a practice lab and we ran > > into this issue. We were both going nuts trying to figure out > > why the iBGP routes weren't synchronizing and this turned out > > to be the cause. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > John > > > > > > Get your own "800" number > > Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more > > http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30282&t=30126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF into iBGP with Sync [7:30126]
- Original Message - From: "Peter van Oene" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 7:47 PM Subject: Re: OSPF into iBGP with Sync [7:30126] > To my knowledge, this is purely a cisco implementation issue and you'd need > to look at the code or ask the coders what their particular intention > was. OSPF didn't play much of a role in transit networks during the time > when synchronization was a relevant option as far as I know so I doubt > there was very extensive testing done on this particular feature. I would > expect this was just an additional check to ensure route > authenticity. Given this feature is many years antiquated, I'm surprised > so many folks try and make it work. > unfortunately, if it were as simple as just that, I could just deal with it. However, when it affects my ability to propagate iBGP routes to an eBGP neighbor, and the restriction is sync on all but the route reflector router, a solution has to be figured out. If it were on the lab exam, I'd probably disable sync if I got desparate (and kiss some points goodbye) if I didn't know the answer. Therein lies a good point for the lab exam: Know what your contigency (backup) plan is if you can't figure out the solution that you're being pointed to so that you can at least get the darned thing running and you can move on to the next step. > pete > > > At 06:23 PM 12/26/2001 -0500, John Neiberger wrote: > >We discovered something on the CCIE list recently and I'm > >wondering if anyone might be able to explain the reasoning > >behing this behavior. > > > >BGP synchronization rules require that if an iBGP peer is to > >advertise a route learned via iBGP, it must have that prefix > >*and* the next hop for that route in the routing table already. > > > >An interesting added complexity to this occurs if your IGP is > >OSPF. If the router in question has learned these prefixes via > >OSPF, then the advertising router ID in the OSPF database must > >match the router ID of the iBGP peer that advertised the route. > > > >Has this behavior caused any problems for any of you? Do you > >know why the synchronization rules have a special case for OSPF > >and not other routing protocols? > > > >I was working with someone else on a practice lab and we ran > >into this issue. We were both going nuts trying to figure out > >why the iBGP routes weren't synchronizing and this turned out > >to be the cause. > > > >Any thoughts? > > > >Thanks, > >John > > > > > >Get your own "800" number > >Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more > >http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30283&t=30126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Practical Studies by Cisco Press [7:30243]
check out on VUE .. its under 50$ http://vig.pearsoned.com/store/home/1,4158,store-3701_id-2,00.html Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30284&t=30243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
Marc , I appreciate you input Thanks. ""c1sc0k1d"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well I dunno Chuck... that's kinda hard. That requires... > > 1. Searching > 2. Reading > 3. Understanding > 4. Applying > > Lot's of people who come here don't want any part of that. They just want > someone else to type out the config so they can paste it and look good to > the boss, which Marc has so kindly done. > > > The k1d > > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > let's see - if I say that there are lots of examples on CCO, I'm not very > > helpful. > > > > OK > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/inte > > r_c/icdlogin.htm > > > > you should be able to get to the tunnel interface configuration guide from > > there. > > > > HTH > > > > Chuck > > > > PS it is NEVER too soon to learn to do CCO searches. > > > > > > ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Can you pus something concrete in? > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > unless there are firewalls involved, this is a no brainer. trhere are > > MANY > > > > examples on CCO. > > > > > > > > I have done this several times in the last year with folks over the > > 'net. > > > > works just fine, with every routing protocol I can think of. > > > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over > the > > > the > > > > > Internet routers? > > > > > IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30285&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Will One Of Your New Year's Resolutions Be To Save [7:30286]
> > PAY ONLY - 4.9 CENTS PER MINUTE! > > On All Interstate Long Distance Phone Calls. > Actually I find it cheaper by using two cans and a string. What? Nobody converting to VOIP in their homes? Why are we paying for these broadband connections? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30286&t=30286 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212]
Greg, et al, I agree that repetition is the way to rote memorization, if not understanding. Unfortunately, we do have time constraints and must move on each day. That said, there is a certain degree of repetition in that many succeeding labs contain portions of previous labs. At the CCNP level we assume a certain degree of motivation and seriousness of purpose on the part of the student. We provide open lab time for them to practice. Also, we hope to soon be implementing a web based simulator that will allow students to practice at home. I am afraid though, that some students equate the academy program to a Cisco approved brain-dump and aren't prepared to put in the hours out of class that are required. Now matter how forcefully I tell them at the beginning, they still don't come into class properly prepared. I'm sure you have had the same experience with your students (those would be the ones ending up as slip&fall specialists, right?). :) Best Holiday Wishes to You and Yours, Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy P.S. I don't consider reading your posts a waste of time. Greg Macaulay wrote: > Hello Tom -- and "et al" > > Now that the crush of the holidays are ebbing I can try and focus on some > email responses which are past due. > > Tom, I didn't intend by my original response to negate any specific > professor/trainer/teacher. I simply cited my own personal experience that I > found successful in teaching. Perhaps it was because I was trained in a > "rigid" catholic elementary school. But I have found that "reps" and > "continued reps" tend to reinforce tasks to the brain that a "one-time only" > exhibition (which is usually undertaken "once" because of time constraints) > fails to ensure a student truly understands. For myself, I learned the > multiplication tables standing in the aisles with my classmates and loudly > reciting (and re-reciting) many times 1x1=1, 1x2=2, etc. until it was > permanently stamped on my brain. I have transferred (for better or worse) > those teaching traits to my own teaching along with personal -- one-on-one > sessions. > > The personal sessions I have utilized to give a student confidence and to > allow for each student to ask questions that he/she would otherwise be > reluctant to raise in front of their peers -- for whatever reason. Also, > these sessions allow me to drive home the various concepts I have been > teaching and to ensure -- as much as humanly possible -- that each of my > students has a firm grasp on these concepts. I have always believed that it > was my responsibility as a teacher to ensure that my methods were successful > for each of my students. On the other hand, I don't sugggest that a teacher > is shirking their duties by not doing this. Rather, I consider it my > personal responsibility. > > Anyway, enuf ( I always wanted to spell it that way -- God Bless you Sr. > Victoria!!! ) preaching. Just, a further explanation of my own .02!! > Have a great New Year to you Tom (and your family) and to everyone else who > may want to waste time reading this thread > > Greg Macaulay > (Almost) Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth > Lifetime AARP member > Retired Attorney/Law Professor > - Original Message - > From: "Tom Lisa" > To: > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:45 AM > Subject: Re: cisco academy's routing skills final ,tough!!! [7:29212] > > > Greg, > > > > You may not be aware, but many, if not all, academies allow the student a > > retake if they fail the Skills Based Assessment (practical exam in plain > > english -- just put that in since you're a lawyer) the first time. Every > > area > > tasked in the practical is covered at least once in a lab experiment > > during the semester. > > > > The 60% failure rate I had indicated was for the first try. Final pass > rate > > was 90%. I don't think this is an unacceptable failure rate for CCNP > > level students. BTW, I am reminded, from my days as a consultant for > > law office management systems, that there isn't anything brief about a > > legal brief. > > > > Happy Holidays All, > > > > Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI > > Community College of Southern Nevada > > Cisco Regional Networking Academy > > (Still Pres., Groupstudy Old Geezers Club) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30288&t=29212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Will One Of Your New Year's Resolutions Be To [7:30287]
This is such a good mailing list - it is a shame they won't secure it from the spammers. Its easy to do if you give up allowing open posts via non-smtp or non-member smtp sources. In the age of free email accounts anyone can get an email account and participate on mailing lists without using (ab)usenet to post. Use usenet to archive and smtp to post, but only from double-verified opt-in subscribers. Do that and the spam will disappear as spammers are not willing to take the time to individually subscribe to a mailing list before spamming it. Spammers are lazy. Oh well. Allen May wrote: > > ActuallyI think people on this list resolve to SPEND THOUSANDS ON > ROUTERS...not save pennies ;) > > BTW, Paul, I checked out the mail server & it's not relaying (in case that > was in your logs). > > Allen > > - Original Message - > From: Long Distance Savings > To: > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:13 PM > Subject: Will One Of Your New Year's Resolutions Be To Save Money? [7:30273] > > > If you answered yes to the above question, > > we can help. > > > > PAY ONLY - 4.9 CENTS PER MINUTE! > > On All Interstate Long Distance Phone Calls. > > > > This flat rate applies anywhere in the Continental US > > Same low rates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. > > > > No Fees In Bound 800 Numbers Available. > > Rates are the same - 4.9 CPM on interstate calls > > > > Competitive Intrastate Rates > > Low International Rates > > > > NO Sign-Up Fees > > NO Monthly Minimums > > NO Monthly Fees > > NO Long Term Contract > > All calls are billed in 6 second increments. > > > > This is NOT a dial around program, You > > dial 1+ just as with regular phone calls. > > > > On-Line Sign-Up Available. > > View billing details on-line in addition to > > standard paper statement. > > > > Pay monthly bill by check or by credit card. > > > > To view more details, including a link to > > our free secure on-line sign-up page, please > > click on the following link: > > > > http://www.accxx-telecom.net/ > > > > > > Click below to be removed: > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=REMOVE -- James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP Sr. Network/Security Engineer "non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30287&t=30287 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Concord Nethealth QN [7:30289]
Hi all, Those of u that have used nethealth monitoring tool, please advise. I want to let customers be able to browse the nethealth browser and be able to login and run health reports and at a glance reports, how do i go around this. Anyone whos done this before please help Regards MMK __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30289&t=30289 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP filtering [7:30172]
Good start, RPSL is actually a step forward from RIPE-181. I think RIPE has the best documentation and surely most widely used RPSL databases. The IRR as the collection of databases isn't quite perfectly mirrored nor is the data nearly up to date. As for the question about the application. It sounds like your being asked to filter routes the other networks(probably just customers and peers) are advertising into your network. The nice idea being chased is probably to verify authority to advertise a given route to prevent mistakes and some malicious activity. Various Places to look: http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/db/irrtoolset/index.html nee http://www.isi.edu/ra/RAToolSet/ http://www.ripe.net/ http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/ http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/databaseref-manual.html RPSL in RFC 2622 RFC 2725 Using RPSL RFC 2650 Peter van Oene wrote: > > AS-Macro's are an object in an RPSL based Internet Routing Registry (IRR) > that is used to simplify routing policy registration by grouping AS's. See > Ripe-181 (rfc 1786). > > If you happen to build routing policies using RPSL, I expect you can write > policies around AS-Macros, though I've no experience doing so. Try posting > on the ISP lists, ISP-Routing or ISP-BGP or another similar ISP oriented > list or doing some additional reading. > > At 06:23 AM 12/27/2001 -0500, you wrote: > >Recently I was asked to do BGP filtering for a peer thru AS-Macros. I've > >looked around but can't find any examples of it. I'm at a loss: is BGP > >filtering thru AS-Macros another fancy name for AS-PATH filtering, or is it > >something entirely different? If it is different, can anybody point mt to > >some examples/sources of information on this? > > > >Many thanks, > >Hugo Taxa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30290&t=30172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
