RE: root switch [7:39975]
You could try and set the bridge priority Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39981&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to test VOIP on remote side??? [7:39980]
IT Guy csim start Tarek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of IT Guy Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 1:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to test VOIP on remote side??? [7:39980] Guys, I saw on the list the command how to test VOIP on the remote site but I forgeted.Any one can help to remind? Thkx _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39982&t=39980 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP Question: Change of Feasible Distance (FD) - Please [7:39984]
But what if a route's metric changes, so that the minimum distance to the destination increases beyond the FD. In this case will the FD be updated or not? If the answer is yes, (as I assume it to be) why does Dyole say that because the route didn't become active the FD didn't change.(Chapter 8, before figure 8.15) Thanks, Hamid --- "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > The FD is the lowest distance a router has to a specific network. > A router > may have more than one path to said network, but the lowest > distance is FD > and it is entered into the routing table. More than one route to > said > network can still exist and it will be entered in the EIGRP > topology table > as a back-up route. > > Without reading of the examples, I am guesing that a route's metric > in the > EIGRP topology table has changed. Even if it goes lower than it > was > previously, if it's not lower than the FD (the route in the routing > table) > than the FD to that netwtork doesn't change. If it is lower, than > it will > change the FD as it will become the new FD. > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > Get in my head: > http://sar.dynu.com > > > ""Hamid Ali Asgari"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > > > Studying EIGRP, I got to a question: When is the Feasible > Distance > > (FD) for a destination updated. In Jeff Doyles Routing TCP/IP, > > chapter 8, it says that as a result of a local computation the > > following may occur: > > > > -If the feasible successor with the lowest distance is different > from > > the existing successor, the feasible successor will become the > > successor. > > -If the new distance is lower than the FD, the FD will be > updated. > > -If the new distance is different from the existing distance, > updates > > will be sent to all neighbors. > > > > So I asume that as a result of a local computation the FD may be > > updated (reduced). > > > > Later in this chapter, before figure 8.15 it says: Because the > > distance to 10.1.7.0 has increased and the route did not become > > active, the FD is unchanged at Lilienthal. > > > > In EIGRP's White Paper on cisco's web site, after figure 3 it > says: > > When the link between Routers One and Three goes down, Router One > > examines each path it knows to Network A and finds that it has a > > feasible successor through Router Four. Router One uses this > route, > > using the metric through Router Four as the new feasible > distance. > > > > In the book , Network Design and Case Studies by Cisco , Chapter > 3 > > Designing Large Scale Ip netwoks, Subtitle : Enhanced EIGRP > > Convergence , It is mentioned that the > > FD can only change during an active-to-passive transition . > > > > I am totally confused about the FD and what triggers an update > for > > it. I don't get it. Is a ROUTE ACTIVATION required for a FD > update > > necessarily? > > > > If the router receives a better advertisement , and if the FD is > > lower , I feel FD can change during a local computation itself . > > > > Could any one explain? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Hamid > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover > > http://greetings.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39984&t=39984 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
Mayo, I humbly must disagree with you. The 2600 series does indeed require IP Plus. The newer 1700s (1721, 1760 probably) only require IP (I setup trunking on a 1721 w/IP a couple of weeks ago), which makes them a perfect choice for low-cost InterVLAN routing. I have attempted to use IP but found the necessary configs missing. Rik -Original Message- From: Mayo, Simer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] It should work with IP feature. IP Plus is not mandatory but recommended. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP Plus feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotqIs this absolutely true that you need IP PlusHas anyone got it working with just the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my 2620Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. That could have helped :-) Thank you. >From: "James Wilson" >Reply-To: "James Wilson" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and >it >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, >though. > >-- >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP >Sr. Network/Security Engineer >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Rik Guyler >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Another bit of good info to know: > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid >the >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 >and >1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. > >Rik > >-Original Message- >From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work >in a 2600 router at 10mb > > > > >Larry Letterman >Cisco Systems >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked >with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. > >If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. >You >could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for >the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years >ago, >given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost >about $1000 per port. > >Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast >ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable >option. > >Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port >connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, >all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with >subinterfaces >on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route >between these vlans. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39985&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pix questions [7:39986]
what is the difference between feature based and connection based activation key ? the activation key is generated by the pix itself or it gets loaded by factory settings when pix is sent to the customer ? how does this thing work ? what is inside the BIOS flash ? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39986&t=39986 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AS5301 modem question [7:39917]
Does anyone have any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39987&t=39917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written exam study advice. [7:39772]
Sophie, I found the Boson test #3 a big help, along with a lot of the CID material I studied for my CCDP. Dennis Laganiere also has a good study guide, check it out on Amazon. Good Luck! Greg Jones CCNP+Sec, CCDP, MCP (& working on CCIE) ""Ben Lovegrove"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sophie, > > I found the CCIE prep kit to be just the right size and content. > > ISBN 078972359X > > Regards, > Ben > > --- Sophie Deller wrote: > I have completed CCNP > and am currently preparing to study for the > > CCIE > > written exam. I would like some suggestions as to where to start my > > study, > > what courses are recommended and what books others have found useful. > > I have > > looked at the CISCO site and the list is endless..Any suggestions ? > > > = > Ben Lovegrove, CCNP > Redspan Solutions Ltd > Web: www.redspan.com & www.bensbookmarks.com > Tel: +44 (0)2392 492010 > Fax: +44 (0)870 460 2156 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cisco hardware, software, accessories, and certification tips > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39983&t=39772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
Rik, if you don't mind my asking, which IOS release did you try for the 26xx? I am finding that things tend to change rapidly and in unexpected ways for newer releases, particularly since the release of 12.1 Reg ""Rik Guyler"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Mayo, I humbly must disagree with you. The 2600 series does indeed require > IP Plus. The newer 1700s (1721, 1760 probably) only require IP (I setup > trunking on a 1721 w/IP a couple of weeks ago), which makes them a perfect > choice for low-cost InterVLAN routing. > > I have attempted to use IP but found the necessary configs missing. > > Rik > > -Original Message- > From: Mayo, Simer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > It should work with IP feature. IP Plus is not mandatory but recommended. > > -Original Message- > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP Plus > feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotqIs this > absolutely true that you need IP PlusHas anyone got it working with just > > the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus > feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my > 2620Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. That > could have helped :-) > Thank you. > > > >From: "James Wilson" > >Reply-To: "James Wilson" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > > > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and > >it > >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, > >though. > > > >-- > >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP > >Sr. Network/Security Engineer > >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" > >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Rik Guyler > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >Another bit of good info to know: > > > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or > >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to > >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid > >the > >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > > > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking > >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over > >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 > >and > >1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. > > > >Rik > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work > >in a 2600 router at 10mb > > > > > > > > > >Larry Letterman > >Cisco Systems > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked > >with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. > > > >If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. > >You > >could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for > >the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years > >ago, > >given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost > >about $1000 per port. > > > >Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast > >ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable > >option. > > > >Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port > >connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, > >all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with > >subinterfaces > >on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route > >between these vlans. > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39988&t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report
RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]
Have seen it on many (mostly smaller) routers. Its a bug: > > ## Bug Id : CSCdu60369 > > ## Headline no syslog logging when logging synchronous enabled > > ## Product c2600 Model > > ## Component os-logging Duplicate of > > ## Severity 2 Status M > > ## Version Found12.0(7)T 12.0(6)S Fixed-in Version12.2(5) > > ## Release Notes > > ## > > ## The logging synchronous line configuration command may > > ## cause logging to stop. > > ## > > ## Workaround: Remove this command. hth Reinhold Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote: > > Amazing I removed logging synchronous on line console 0 > and debug > worked > > I am curious, what is the reason for "logging synchronous" > preventing debug > outputs > > on terminal lines? > > Pierre-Alex > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of > Lidiya White > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957] > > > I would add "no ip route-cache" on that interface and make sure > that you > don't have "logging synchronous" under line con 0... > > -- Lidiya White > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of > Pierre-Alex Guanel > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 3:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957] > > Kind of a silly problem but can't figure it out ... > > I am connected to R1 via telnet. I have turned on debugging of > ip > packets > > I also have issued the command "terminal monitor" > > Yet I do not get anything logged when I ping the Ethernet > interface of > R1 > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > > > > R1#sh terminal > Line 2, Location: "", Type: "ANSI" > Length: 45 lines, Width: 80 columns > Baud rate (TX/RX) is 9600/9600 > Status: Ready, Active, No Exit Banner > Capabilities: Receives Logging Output > Modem state: Ready > Group codes:0 > Special Chars: Escape Hold Stop Start Disconnect Activation > ^^xnone - - none > Timeouts: Idle EXECIdle Session Modem Answer Session > Dispatch > never never > none not > set > Idle Session Disconnect Warning > never > Login-sequence User Response > 00:00:30 > Autoselect Initial Wait > not set > Modem type is unknown. > Session limit is not set. > Time since activation: 00:41:15 > Editing is enabled. > History is enabled, history size is 10. > DNS resolution in show commands is enabled > Full user help is disabled > Allowed transports are lat pad v120 mop telnet rlogin nasi. > Preferred > is > lat. > No output characters are padded > No special data dispatching characters > > > R1#sh logging > Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 > overruns) > Console logging: level debugging, 102 messages logged > Monitor logging: level debugging, 2 messages logged > Logging to: vty2(0) > Buffer logging: level debugging, 102 messages logged > Trap logging: level informational, 47 message lines logged > > Log Buffer (4096 bytes): > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39989&t=39957 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pix questions [7:39986]
Activation key is something you can request from [EMAIL PROTECTED] They generate act keys based on your request. By default PIX doesn't come with all features enabled (unless you specifically asked for it when you were buying a PIX). So let's say if you decided to run IPSec, and want DES enabled, you need a new act key. Or if you want failover enabled - again a new act key. Those are feature based act keys. If you bought a PIX firewall with 100 user license, and in few months your company grew, you'll need a new activation key for more users (let's say 500 user license). This one is connection based act key. Activation keys are cut based on the serial number of the PIX Firewall, so if you'll be upgrading OS code, you don't need a new act key. But If you'll be replacing your PIX Firewall, you'll need to request a new activation key... --- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Green Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pix questions [7:39986] what is the difference between feature based and connection based activation key ? the activation key is generated by the pix itself or it gets loaded by factory settings when pix is sent to the customer ? how does this thing work ? what is inside the BIOS flash ? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39990&t=39986 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]
Cool! I will spend sometime today learning how to use the bug tool... Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957] Have seen it on many (mostly smaller) routers. Its a bug: > > ## Bug Id : CSCdu60369 > > ## Headline no syslog logging when logging synchronous enabled > > ## Product c2600 Model > > ## Component os-logging Duplicate of > > ## Severity 2 Status M > > ## Version Found12.0(7)T 12.0(6)S Fixed-in Version12.2(5) > > ## Release Notes > > ## > > ## The logging synchronous line configuration command may > > ## cause logging to stop. > > ## > > ## Workaround: Remove this command. hth Reinhold Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote: > > Amazing I removed logging synchronous on line console 0 > and debug > worked > > I am curious, what is the reason for "logging synchronous" > preventing debug > outputs > > on terminal lines? > > Pierre-Alex > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of > Lidiya White > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957] > > > I would add "no ip route-cache" on that interface and make sure > that you > don't have "logging synchronous" under line con 0... > > -- Lidiya White > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of > Pierre-Alex Guanel > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 3:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957] > > Kind of a silly problem but can't figure it out ... > > I am connected to R1 via telnet. I have turned on debugging of > ip > packets > > I also have issued the command "terminal monitor" > > Yet I do not get anything logged when I ping the Ethernet > interface of > R1 > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > > > > R1#sh terminal > Line 2, Location: "", Type: "ANSI" > Length: 45 lines, Width: 80 columns > Baud rate (TX/RX) is 9600/9600 > Status: Ready, Active, No Exit Banner > Capabilities: Receives Logging Output > Modem state: Ready > Group codes:0 > Special Chars: Escape Hold Stop Start Disconnect Activation > ^^xnone - - none > Timeouts: Idle EXECIdle Session Modem Answer Session > Dispatch > never never > none not > set > Idle Session Disconnect Warning > never > Login-sequence User Response > 00:00:30 > Autoselect Initial Wait > not set > Modem type is unknown. > Session limit is not set. > Time since activation: 00:41:15 > Editing is enabled. > History is enabled, history size is 10. > DNS resolution in show commands is enabled > Full user help is disabled > Allowed transports are lat pad v120 mop telnet rlogin nasi. > Preferred > is > lat. > No output characters are padded > No special data dispatching characters > > > R1#sh logging > Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 > overruns) > Console logging: level debugging, 102 messages logged > Monitor logging: level debugging, 2 messages logged > Logging to: vty2(0) > Buffer logging: level debugging, 102 messages logged > Trap logging: level informational, 47 message lines logged > > Log Buffer (4096 bytes): Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39991&t=39957 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992]
Experience & the archives show that: -Bruce Caslow's Book -Boson #1 or #2 by Bernard -CCO should be enough. During the period that you wait & practice for the lab exam, you will have plenty of time to read: Halabi Jeff Doyle (1 &2) and many many others I also second John Neiberger when he says, get your CCDP first. CID questions are a major part of CCIE written exam. Hey John, I wish you good luck with your lab. I know you have about 10 more days to go. I hope you will continue to contribute to this list after you get your 9###, otherwise we will miss your valuable posts a lot. A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) --- Sophie Deller wrote: > I have completed CCNP and am currently preparing to study for the CCIE written exam. I would like some suggestions as to where to start my study, what courses are recommended and what books others have found useful. I have looked at the CISCO site and the list is endless..Any suggestions ? -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39992&t=39992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst switch user interface [7:39993]
Hi all, I am trying to put together a summary of the user interfaces of different Catalyst switches to help me remember this stuff, seems to me that there are four flavor: 1) Menu interface for Cat1900/2820(except Enterprise SW which uses CLI), 3000 and all Token Ring Switches 2) IOS like CLI interface with layer 2 switching: 1900/2820 Enterprise, 2900XL/3500XL 3) IOS like CLI with layer 3 switching: 2948G-L3, 4908G-L3, 4000, 4840, 3550, native IOS of Cat6000, routing blades of Cat 6500 and 5000/5500 and 8500 4) The rest are all CatOS Please correct mistakes and help me with any missing parts. Thanks LU __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39993&t=39993 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2600 with 2 t1 wic to internet [7:39994]
Can I get sample script form any one how this should look Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39994&t=39994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
Ha! Ha!.That's exactly what I meantHaving the IP feature set or the IP/IPX...feature set only requires 8M flash and 24M memAnd you can configure intervlan routing on itAnd thus was my question: If this works, then why IP PLUS feature set...which is what you noted in your earlier email Nevertheless, I am going to try it out in the next half hour (it's Sunday) and let you know if just the IP feature set works!! Nevertheless, you are always welcome for a beer or two if you happen to be in our area (Reston/Herndon).. :-) Regards, >From: MADMAN >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Cisco Nuts >Subject: Re: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:46:46 -0600 > > > ok you owe me a cold beer!! I installed desktop, there was no ip/ipx >only but the memory requirements were still 8 and 24M. > >C2620A#sh ha >Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software >IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE >(fc2) >Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. >Compiled Tue 07-Dec-99 01:20 by phanguye >Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x808D24CC > >ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > >C2620A uptime is 4 minutes >System returned to ROM by reload >System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-7.T.bin" > >cisco 2620 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x100) with 59392K/6144K bytes >of memory >. >Processor board ID JAB0313059E (886809376) >M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49 >Bridging software. >X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. >1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) >32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. >8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) > >Configuration register is 0x2102 > >C2620A#conf t >Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. >C2620A(config)#inter fa0/0.1 >C2620A(config-subif)#en >C2620A(config-subif)#encapsulation ? > dot1Q IEEE 802.1Q Virtual LAN > isl Inter Switch Link - Virtual LAN encapsulation > sde IEEE 802.10 Virtual LAN - Secure Data Exchange > tr-isl Token Ring Inter Switch Link - Virtual LAN encapsulation > >C2620A(config-subif)#encapsulation > > Dave > > > >Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > Actually, I just used the Feature Navigator and found out that 12.0.7T will > > support ISL Vlan with the ip/ipx feature set..Which means that I can get > > away with my 2620 just having 8M flash and 24M mem. > > Can you verify this? > > > > >From: "MADMAN" > > >Reply-To: "MADMAN" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:59:10 -0500 > > > > > >A quick glance on the feature navigator afirms that you need the plus > > >version. Memory is much cheaper if you don't buy it from Cisco!!! > > > > > > Dave > > > > > >Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > > > > > So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP > > >Plus > > > > feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotqIs > > >this > > > > absolutely true that you need IP PlusHas anyone got it working with > > >just > > > > the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus > > > > feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my > > > > 2620Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. > > >That > > > > could have helped :-) > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > >From: "James Wilson" > > > > >Reply-To: "James Wilson" > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > > > > > > > > > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES > > >and > > > > >it > > > > >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a > > >champ, > > > > >though. > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP > > > > >Sr. Network/Security Engineer > > > > >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" > > > > >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > > >Rik Guyler > > > > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Another bit of good info to know: > > > > > > > > > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL > > >or > > > > >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had > > >to > > > > >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to > > >avoid > > > > >the > > > > >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > > > > > > > > > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both > > >trunking > > > > >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings > > >over > > > > >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new > > >1751 > > > > >and > > > > >1760 models which I believe a
playing vlans and ISL [7:39996]
ok, I have a 4700 with a fastE card that is connected to a 5505 switch (port 16). |---2514 (vlan1) 4700---switch|---2501 (vlan2) |---2509 (vlan3) Port 16 is set for trunking ISL: (snip) Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan - 2/16 on isltrunking 3 I have 3 subinterfaces setup on the FastE; fa0.1, fa0.2, fa0.3 each subinterface is IP'ed for 3 different networks; 192.168.1.0,192.168.2.0,192.168.3.0 (respectively): (snip) FastEthernet0.1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is DEC21140, address is 0050.732e.da0a (bia 0050.732e.da0a) Internet address is 192.168.1.250/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ISL Virtual LAN, Color 1. ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 I have 1 router pugged into each vlan on the switch: (snip) Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Lance, address is 0010.7be8.72d1 (bia 0010.7be8.72d1) Internet address is 192.168.3.1/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set I have RIP running on all the routers: (snip) Routing Protocol is "rip" Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 6 seconds Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240 Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set Redistributing: rip Default version control: send version 1, receive any version Interface Send Recv Triggered RIP Key-chain FastEthernet0.1 1 1 2 FastEthernet0.2 1 1 2 FastEthernet0.3 1 1 2 Automatic network summarization is in effect Maximum path: 4 Routing for Networks: 192.168.1.0 192.168.2.0 192.168.3.0 Routing Information Sources: Gateway Distance Last Update Distance: (default is 120) now the problem. I am not getting the rip updates on the other routers. when I do a show ip route on the router connected to vlan 2 for instance: (snip) Gateway of last resort is not set C192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 all I see is the connected network. Nothing from RIP?!? What am I missing?? Thanks, -Joe- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39996&t=39996 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hex interface command [7:39997]
Does anybody know the command to use on an interface to see bridge numbers in hex instead of decimal? Thanks, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39997&t=39997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: playing vlans and ISL [7:39996]
I think I found it... I had some IP'ing wrong. I can see the routes now :^) Gateway of last resort is not set R192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.1, 00:00:07, Ethernet0 C192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 R192.168.3.0/24 -Joe- ""geek"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ok, > > I have a 4700 with a fastE card that is connected to a 5505 switch (port > 16). > > |---2514 (vlan1) > 4700---switch|---2501 (vlan2) > |---2509 (vlan3) > > > Port 16 is set for trunking ISL: > > (snip) > Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan > - > 2/16 on isltrunking 3 > > > I have 3 subinterfaces setup on the FastE; fa0.1, fa0.2, fa0.3 > each subinterface is IP'ed for 3 different networks; > 192.168.1.0,192.168.2.0,192.168.3.0 (respectively): > > (snip) > FastEthernet0.1 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is DEC21140, address is 0050.732e.da0a (bia 0050.732e.da0a) > Internet address is 192.168.1.250/24 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > Encapsulation ISL Virtual LAN, Color 1. > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > > > > I have 1 router pugged into each vlan on the switch: > > (snip) > Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is Lance, address is 0010.7be8.72d1 (bia 0010.7be8.72d1) > Internet address is 192.168.3.1/24 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set > > > I have RIP running on all the routers: > > > (snip) > Routing Protocol is "rip" > Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 6 seconds > Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240 > Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set > Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set > Redistributing: rip > Default version control: send version 1, receive any version > Interface Send Recv Triggered RIP Key-chain > FastEthernet0.1 1 1 2 > FastEthernet0.2 1 1 2 > FastEthernet0.3 1 1 2 > Automatic network summarization is in effect > Maximum path: 4 > Routing for Networks: > 192.168.1.0 > 192.168.2.0 > 192.168.3.0 > Routing Information Sources: > Gateway Distance Last Update > Distance: (default is 120) > > > now the problem. I am not getting the rip updates on the other routers. when > I do a show ip route on the router connected to vlan 2 for instance: > > (snip) > Gateway of last resort is not set > > C192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > > all I see is the connected network. Nothing from RIP?!? > > What am I missing?? > > > Thanks, > > -Joe- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39998&t=39996 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AS5301 modem question [7:39917]
Michael, I have not worked on a 5301, only a 5300 so I will tell you what I know and maybe it will carry over. Since nobody else has any ideas, maybe this will help. In a 5300, the T1 card is a different card than the modem card(s). You said this is a quad T1 card so you should see 4 T1 ports on a card by themselves with maybe a couple of various other ports like console, etc. The modem cards, again on my 5300, had no ports to speak of. They were accessed directly via the backplane of the device. In order to gather modem information, type "show modem" at the enable prompt and this will output individual modem stats as well as tell you how many modems you have. If the 5301 is like the 5300, there are different modem options depending on the options you ordered. The 5300 could have up to 96 modems per card and held up to 2 cards for a total of 192 modems in a single chassis. Hope this helps! Rik -Original Message- From: Michael Douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AS5301 modem question [7:39917] Does anyone have any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3&t=39917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP Question: Change of Feasible Distance (FD) - Please [7:40000]
I looked at the example on Pg. 352, and the distance did change. I think the guy just wrote it weirdly. If you look at the remaining tables in ch 8, the new metric rose from 1280 to 5888. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Hamid Ali Asgari"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > But what if a route's metric changes, so that the minimum distance to > the destination increases beyond the FD. In this case will the FD be > updated or not? > > If the answer is yes, (as I assume it to be) why does Dyole say that > because the route didn't become active the FD didn't change.(Chapter > 8, before figure 8.15) > > Thanks, > Hamid > > --- "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > The FD is the lowest distance a router has to a specific network. > > A router > > may have more than one path to said network, but the lowest > > distance is FD > > and it is entered into the routing table. More than one route to > > said > > network can still exist and it will be entered in the EIGRP > > topology table > > as a back-up route. > > > > Without reading of the examples, I am guesing that a route's metric > > in the > > EIGRP topology table has changed. Even if it goes lower than it > > was > > previously, if it's not lower than the FD (the route in the routing > > table) > > than the FD to that netwtork doesn't change. If it is lower, than > > it will > > change the FD as it will become the new FD. > > > > -- > > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > Get in my head: > > http://sar.dynu.com > > > > > > ""Hamid Ali Asgari"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi, > > > > > > Studying EIGRP, I got to a question: When is the Feasible > > Distance > > > (FD) for a destination updated. In Jeff Doyles Routing TCP/IP, > > > chapter 8, it says that as a result of a local computation the > > > following may occur: > > > > > > -If the feasible successor with the lowest distance is different > > from > > > the existing successor, the feasible successor will become the > > > successor. > > > -If the new distance is lower than the FD, the FD will be > > updated. > > > -If the new distance is different from the existing distance, > > updates > > > will be sent to all neighbors. > > > > > > So I asume that as a result of a local computation the FD may be > > > updated (reduced). > > > > > > Later in this chapter, before figure 8.15 it says: Because the > > > distance to 10.1.7.0 has increased and the route did not become > > > active, the FD is unchanged at Lilienthal. > > > > > > In EIGRP's White Paper on cisco's web site, after figure 3 it > > says: > > > When the link between Routers One and Three goes down, Router One > > > examines each path it knows to Network A and finds that it has a > > > feasible successor through Router Four. Router One uses this > > route, > > > using the metric through Router Four as the new feasible > > distance. > > > > > > In the book , Network Design and Case Studies by Cisco , Chapter > > 3 > > > Designing Large Scale Ip netwoks, Subtitle : Enhanced EIGRP > > > Convergence , It is mentioned that the > > > FD can only change during an active-to-passive transition . > > > > > > I am totally confused about the FD and what triggers an update > > for > > > it. I don't get it. Is a ROUTE ACTIVATION required for a FD > > update > > > necessarily? > > > > > > If the router receives a better advertisement , and if the FD is > > > lower , I feel FD can change during a local computation itself . > > > > > > Could any one explain? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Hamid > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover > > > http://greetings.yahoo.com/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover > http://greetings.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4&t=4 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
even if i set my switch priority 65535(max value), but i can't sure wnen a new switch add with a same priority and a different higher MAC address, which lead to my switch become root. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40001&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992]
Is is OK to assume that ATM and Wan technologies are not on the CCIE written? Thanks for your input Cisco people... > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 5:55 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992] > >Experience & the archives show that: > >-Bruce Caslow's Book >-Boson #1 or #2 by Bernard >-CCO >should be enough. > >During the period that you wait & practice for the lab exam, you will have >plenty of time to read: >Halabi >Jeff Doyle (1 &2) >and many many others > >I also second John Neiberger when he says, get your CCDP first. CID >questions >are a major part of CCIE written exam. > >Hey John, I wish you good luck with your lab. I know you have about 10 more >days to go. >I hope you will continue to contribute to this list after you get your 9###, > >otherwise we will miss your valuable posts a lot. > >A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) > > > > >--- Sophie Deller wrote: > I have completed CCNP >and am currently preparing to study for the >CCIE >written exam. I would like some suggestions as to where to start my >study, >what courses are recommended and what books others have found useful. >I have >looked at the CISCO site and the list is endless..Any suggestions ? > > >-_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- >This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ _ メールサービスは、世界 No.1 の MSN Hotmail で！http://www.hotmail.com/JA/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40002&t=39992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Security [7:40003]
What is the best book to study CCIE (security) Lab? Thanks Masood M. Syed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40003&t=40003 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Who is Priscilla Oppenheimer ? [7:38662]
I can definitely confirm that the rumors are true - she definitely does know an unbelievable amount of stuff. ""R.S.Sundar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello DK, > > Priscilla is an invaluable asset, and a very valuable person not only to > this group but to entire Cisco Learning Networking Community. > > Priscilla Oppenheimer (www.priscilla.com) has garnered a great significance > by not only answering the queries to people.Any query she will try to > explain and help people voluntarily without any expectation.Ofcourse she > spares lot of time for us to answer those. > > Anything in Cisco She has the answer.Buy and read her book Top-Down Network > Design - > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1578700698/ref=nosim/priscilshomepage > > Note: > - > Her Photograph is in my Desktop who constantly inspires me to learn and > achieve like her. > > I also take this opportunity to thank her for her help to this community. > > Regards, > R.S.Sundar > CRMG Coordinator > Future Software Limited > INDIA. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Priscilla Oppenheimer > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Who is Priscilla Oppenheimer ? [7:38662] > > > At 10:50 AM 3/18/02, dk wrote: > >Who is this mystery woman .. who seems to know everything ! > > Not BGP. Not OSPF very well either. But I'm learning! ;-) > > Priscilla > > P.S. There is also a Priscilla Oppenheimer who is (was??) assistant manager > of the San Diego Padres. That's not me. ;-) I'm a Mariners fan. > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40005&t=38662 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992]
No, its not.. I passed it on friday afternoon and there were plenty issues on it about atm and wan...and a lot on sna bridging. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Washington Rico Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992] Is is OK to assume that ATM and Wan technologies are not on the CCIE written? Thanks for your input Cisco people... > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 5:55 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992] > >Experience & the archives show that: > >-Bruce Caslow's Book >-Boson #1 or #2 by Bernard >-CCO >should be enough. > >During the period that you wait & practice for the lab exam, you will have >plenty of time to read: >Halabi >Jeff Doyle (1 &2) >and many many others > >I also second John Neiberger when he says, get your CCDP first. CID >questions >are a major part of CCIE written exam. > >Hey John, I wish you good luck with your lab. I know you have about 10 more >days to go. >I hope you will continue to contribute to this list after you get your 9###, > >otherwise we will miss your valuable posts a lot. > >A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) > > > > >--- Sophie Deller wrote: > I have completed CCNP >and am currently preparing to study for the >CCIE >written exam. I would like some suggestions as to where to start my >study, >what courses are recommended and what books others have found useful. >I have >looked at the CISCO site and the list is endless..Any suggestions ? > > >-_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- >This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ _ メールサービスは、世界 No.1 の MSN Hotmail で！http://www.hotmail.com/JA/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40006&t=39992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992]
I disagree with the below...I used teh Boson #1 test and it severely is lacking in content. I switched to The #3 test by Dennis L and it was the best help besides the caslow book that I foundIf you understand the questions and answers in Dennis's test, you pass the written with no problems... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE written exam study advice [7:39992] Experience & the archives show that: -Bruce Caslow's Book -Boson #1 or #2 by Bernard -CCO should be enough. During the period that you wait & practice for the lab exam, you will have plenty of time to read: Halabi Jeff Doyle (1 &2) and many many others I also second John Neiberger when he says, get your CCDP first. CID questions are a major part of CCIE written exam. Hey John, I wish you good luck with your lab. I know you have about 10 more days to go. I hope you will continue to contribute to this list after you get your 9###, otherwise we will miss your valuable posts a lot. A Strobel ( working on the lab exam.) --- Sophie Deller wrote: > I have completed CCNP and am currently preparing to study for the CCIE written exam. I would like some suggestions as to where to start my study, what courses are recommended and what books others have found useful. I have looked at the CISCO site and the list is endless..Any suggestions ? -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_- This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40007&t=39992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redistribution Matrix is back [7:40008]
A few months ago I proposed a document with examples of IGP redistribution. I finished putting together a first draft, and have posted it at www.laganiere.net. Comments are welcome, and if anybody has anything to add, please let me know... Thanks... --- Dennis Laganiere Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40008&t=40008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spanning Tree Enhancements [7:39920]
Here are some answers: ""Urooj's Hi-speed Internet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Folks, > Can someone please answer my following questions regarding various IEEE > Standards that have been advanced to enhance the Spanning Tree Protocol: > > 1. Has some vendor implemented the 802.1V, 802.1W, and 802.1X standards in > their equipment ? Sure, some vendors have implemented it. Not just any vendor, but most notably, Cisco has partially implemented 802.1w in the 6500, the 4000, and related switches. 802.1x has been implemented into several of the lower-end Cat switches, Ciscosecure ACS, and should be integrated into the 4000/6000 shortly. As far as other vendors are concerned, I believe Foundry has implemented 802.1w in some of its higher-end products. Enterasys too. Some of the authentication server vendors like Funk support 802.1x also. Most of the wireless LAN vendors support or have announced that they are implementing support of 802.1x into their gear.. As far as 802.1v is concerned, I don't think any of the larger vendors have shown any interest, leaving it to small players like Marvell and others. > > 2. If yes, then has it resulted in addition of more switching commands to > augment STP implementation ? I take it you are talking only about 802.1w (dot1v and dot1x have nothing to do with STP). Not really, at least not yet, because the present-day implementations are not flexible at all. Foundry has commands to turn RSTP on and off. Cisco has completely integrated RSTP into MST and has no special RSTP commands. I expect this to change in the future as vendors integrate more tuning features. > > 3. With STP enhancements, is there a possibility that Ethernet networks can > rival SONET's restoration times of 50msec or less in practical reality ? Probably not at the moment. 802.1w offers significantly faster failover, but not that fast. It definitely helps, though, and combined with other features might indeed offer SONET-like restoration. > > Any information will be welcome. TIA. > > Aziz S. Islam Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40004&t=39920 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written exam study advice. [7:39772]
Since this question comes up on a regular basis, I put together a document on preparing for the CCIE Written. I just posted it at www.laganiere.net along with the newest redistribution matrix (it's been a busy weekend... :-)... If anybody has any suggestions or comments, please let me know and I'll amend what's there. Thanks, and I hope it helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: "Sophie Deller" To: Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:26 AM Subject: CCIE written exam study advice. [7:39772] > I have completed CCNP and am currently preparing to study for the CCIE > written exam. I would like some suggestions as to where to start my study, > what courses are recommended and what books others have found useful. I have > looked at the CISCO site and the list is endless..Any suggestions ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40009&t=39772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
If I remember, The root priority thats lower is better.. If you set the root switch with the CLI command set spantree root the command will set the priorities for you correctly.. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 7:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] even if i set my switch priority 65535(max value), but i can't sure wnen a new switch add with a same priority and a different higher MAC address, which lead to my switch become root. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40010&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40011&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help for STUN [7:40012]
Dear All, I require certain help regarding serial tunneling (STUN). The modem connected to the home router is US Robotics 33.6k courier. Here are the details of the current scenario in the Serial Tunneling issue: 1. Serial interfaces of the 2 routers (home and remote)have been configured for Stun. 2. The serial interface on the home router is showing UP, but needs the modem to provide the clocking(DCE). How do u do that? 3. The handshake process is not going through when the call lands on the answering modem connected to the home router. How do u set this right? Pls find below the configs for both the routers along with the connectivity diagram: RouterA#show run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname RouterA ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! stun peer-name 10.1.2.50 stun protocol-group 1 basic ! ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation stun nrzi-encoding stun group 1 stun route all tcp 10.1.2.51 ! interface Ethernet0/1 ip address 10.1.2.50 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0/1 physical-layer async no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! ip classless ! tftp-server flash exit ! line con 0 transport input none line 2 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end RouterB#show run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname RouterB ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! stun peer-name 10.1.2.51 stun protocol-group 1 basic ! ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation stun no ip mroute-cache nrzi-encoding clockrate 56000 stun group 1 stun route all tcp 10.1.2.50 ! interface Ethernet0/1 ip address 10.1.2.51 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! ip classless ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Regards, Pankaj Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40012&t=40012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to configure Mobile ARP?? [7:40013]
Guys, Can you pleasee help me to forward some Link or Right procedure for HOW to configure Mobile ARP?? I can see the Docs in CD and on CISCO but its very long procedure whereas the procedure the guys are used to discussed here on list is a short one ..which is the right way to go??? Thanks for help TOM _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40013&t=40013 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
For the most part here at Cisco, we have no guarrantee that setting a switch to root will stop another switch from coming up as root. However, we set all our roots/sec roots by issuing the set spantree root command. This should lower the prio. of the root/sec root switches to insure that they will always be the roots... We also use portfast to insure no unwanted switches are plugged into our network and allowed to become live Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 10:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40014&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
How about setting your priority to 1? That will make it the root :D or even 0! Default is 32768. We always make ours 0 or 1, I never use set spantree root.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40015&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: root switch [7:39975]
i have understanded it and thanks for Kris Keen ,Larry Letterman and groupstudy board, give me a more help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40016&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to configure Mobile ARP?? [7:40013]
do you mean Mobile IP ? ""IT Guy"" Guys, > > Can you pleasee help me to forward some Link or Right procedure for HOW to > configure Mobile ARP?? > > I can see the Docs in CD and on CISCO but its very long procedure whereas > the procedure the guys are used to discussed here on list is > a short one ..which is the right way to go??? > > Thanks for help > > TOM > > > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40017&t=40013 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
