Re: OSPF GRE tunnel to connect areas. [7:50579]
it's working. Had a couple of issues.
First off, forgot to put my area 0 authentication on the tunnel. I
also had my tunnel source/destinations mixed up
Does anyone have any good notes they've taken on Tunnels?
below is the config for r2
interface Tunnel1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip ospf authentication
ip ospf authentication-key cisco
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination 150.1.222.5
and r5
interface Tunnel0
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
ip ospf authentication
ip ospf authentication-key cisco
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination 150.1.222.2
!
r5(#on
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address
Interface
150.1.222.2 1 FULL/DROTHER00:00:37150.1.222.2
Ethernet0
150.1.222.6 1 FULL/DR 00:00:39150.1.222.6
Ethernet0
150.1.111.3 1 FULL/DR 00:01:50150.1.111.3
Serial0
150.1.222.2 1 FULL/ -00:00:34192.168.1.1
Tunnel0
Tim
On 3 Aug 2002 08:31:20 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Timothy Ouellette")
wrote:
>Hey team,
>
>Just playing around with OSPF and GRE tunnels and having no luck. Can
>anyone help?
>
>Router1's s1 interface is in area 12 as is router2's s0. Between R2
>and R5 is area 51
>(network 151.1.222.0/24). As you can see in order for area 12 to
>communicate with the rest
>of the ospf network it needs a virtual link beween r2 and r5. I did
>that and it worked.
>
>What i'm trying to do now is a GRE tunnel between r2 and r5. The tunnel
>is up but r1 never
>sees the routers that it did when the virtual-link was up. The tunnel
>interfaces show up
>can I ping the loopback on r5 from r2 and vice verase but r1 sees no
>ospf routes.
>
>
>R1--area12--R2area51--R5--area0
> (150.1.2.2) (151.1.5.5)
>
>
>Below are the configs. Feel free to email me directly with my blunder
>if you so desire.
>
>
>r2's config
>-
>nterface Loopback0
> ip address 150.1.2.2 255.255.255.0
>!
>interface Tunnel1
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> tunnel source Loopback0
> tunnel destination 150.1.5.5
>!
>interface Ethernet0
> ip address 150.1.222.2 255.255.255.0
>!
>interface Serial0
> ip address 150.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
> clockrate 64000
>!
>router ospf 1
> router-id 150.1.222.2
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 150.1.12.2 0.0.0.0 area 12
> network 150.1.222.2 0.0.0.0 area 51
>!
>ip classless
>ip route 150.1.5.5 255.255.255.255 Ethernet0
>
>
>r5's config
>
>interface Loopback0
> ip address 150.1.5.5 255.255.255.0
>!
>interface Tunnel0
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> tunnel source Loopback0
> tunnel destination 150.1.2.2
>!
>interface Ethernet0
> ip address 150.1.222.5 255.255.255.0
>!
>!
>router ospf 1
> router-id 150.1.111.5
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 150.1.111.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 150.1.222.5 0.0.0.0 area 51
>!
>ip classless
>ip route 150.1.2.2 255.255.255.255 Ethernet0
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50584&t=50579
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC server. Geoff? [7:49203]
Is there still a IRC server for groupstudy folks? Sure could use some after hours support *grin* Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49203&t=49203 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]
Excellent description John. Reinforced my understanding of FD and AD
Tim
On 19 Apr 2002 12:07:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("John
Neiberger") wrote:
>The key words here are Feasible Distance and Advertised Distance, or in
>this case, reported distance. The FD is the metric for the current
>path. If we have two neighbors who are reporting that they can reach
>that network, both will be advertising what *their* FD is, which from
>our perspective is the Advertised Distance.
>
>
>[RA]---(10)[RB]-(50)-Network Z
> \/
>\/
> \--(20)[RC]-(50)--/
>
>
>Imagine that somewhere beyond Routers B and C is a Network, Z. They
>each have a metric of 50 to that network, which is their FD. Router A
>will see two available routes to Z but the one through B has a lower
>metric and it will be installed into the routing table.
>
>However, because RC's Advertised Distance to Z (50) is less than Router
>A's current FD (60), it will be installed as a feasible successor. If
>the metric from Router C to Network Z was 60 or over, it would not be a
>feasible successor. In that case, if the link from A to B were to go
>away, A would not immediately begin using RC as the next hop to Z.
>Instead it would send queries to all of its EIGRP neighbors and it would
>start forwarding to C after C answers that it can reach Z.
>
>I hope that makes sense. I have a cold and am fairly medicated right
>now. ;-)
>
>John
>
>
"Sean Wolfe" 4/19/02 9:34:03 AM >>>
>EIGRP question:
>
>According to Cisco's website: "Feasible distance is the best metric
>along a
>path to a destination network, including the metric to the neighbor
>advertising that path. A feasible successor is a path whose reported
>distance is less than the feasible distance."
>
>But wouldn't a route with a distance less than the feasible distance be
>in
>the routing table already, since it had a better metric?
>
>It makes more sense to me that the feasible successor is a route with
>a
>slightly larger metric than the current route. That way if the current
>route
>dies, the next-best path is promoted.
>
>But that's not what I'm reading at
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp1.html#6
>
>So . . . whaddya say?
>
>Thanks, -Sean.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41989&t=41957
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helpppppp [7:41796]
Is it possible that someone put the no-exec line on the console port
or your speed isn't set to 9600. Are you using hyperterm or teraterm
or equivalent?
If this isn't a production box, why not practice your password
recovery skills and set a new vty password and then check the console
settings?
Tim
On 17 Apr 2002 23:04:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Juan Blanco")
wrote:
>Team,
>I have a 2500 route which I don't seem to be able to connect to the console
>port, and one serial interface has an ip, which I can ping to and I can
>telnet to it but I don't seem to be able to have the correct password. What
>else I can do here to get into this baby.
>
>Thanks,
>
>JB
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41799&t=41796
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CS-516 Terminal Server Issues [7:41760]
I think I made a mistake in my last post. Anyways, here's my config
of my cs-516.
ccie-lab#sh conf
Using 650 out of 32512 bytes
!
version 9.21
no service pad
service password-encryption
!
hostname ccie-lab
!
clock timezone EST -5
enable password 7 051F0F02
!
no ip domain-lookup
ip tcp synwait-time 5
!
interface Ethernet0
ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
no lat enabled
no mop enabled
!
ip host R1 2001 192.168.1.254
ip host R2 2002 192.168.1.254
ip host R3 2003 192.168.1.254
ip host R4 2004 192.168.1.254
ip host R5 2005 192.168.1.254
ip host R6 2006 192.168.1.254
ip host R7 2007 192.168.1.254
ip host R8 2008 192.168.1.254
ip host R9 2009 192.168.1.254
ip host R10 2010 192.168.254
logging buffered
!
line con 0
no exec
exec-timeout 0 0
line 1 16
no exec
transport input telnet
stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
exec-timeout 0 0
password 7
login
!
end
ccie-lab#
On 17 Apr 2002 14:20:12 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Tim Lovelace")
wrote:
>I finally have gotten back around to getting my CS-516 back up and
>working, and I am having a problem..
>
>To actually connect to a console takes somewhere in the area of 5
>minutes, I hope that is not normal. Also, many times I get "Connection
>refused by remote host" although I could connect 20 minutes before and I
>can still consol in with my laptop fine. Below is a sh ver and wr term.
>If anyone has any advice, please let me know. Thanks for the help.
>
>Tim
>
>CS#sh ver
>CS Software (CS500-KR), Version 9.21(3), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
>Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems, Inc.
>Compiled Tue 03-May-94 16:25 by jyang
>
>ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 4.7(3), RELEASE SOFTWARE
>
>CS uptime is 1 hour, 55 minutes
>System restarted by reload
>System image file is unknown, booted via tty1
>
>Cisco-CS500 (68331) processor with 10240K bytes of memory.
>SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
>1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface.
>16 terminal lines.
>32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
>Configuration register is 0x101
>
>CS#wr term
>##
>Current configuration:
>!
>version 9.21
>no service pad
>!
>hostname CS
>!
>enable password XX
>!
>ip routing
>no ip domain-lookup
>!
>interface Loopback0
>ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.0
>!
>interface Ethernet0
>ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 255.255.255.0
>!
>ip host R9 2009 10.10.10.10
>ip host R7 2007 10.10.10.10
>ip host R8 2008 10.10.10.10
>ip host R1 2001 10.10.10.10
>ip host R2 2002 10.10.10.10
>ip host R3 2003 10.10.10.10
>ip host R4 2004 10.10.10.10
>ip host R5 2005 10.10.10.10
>ip host R6 2006 10.10.10.10
>ip host R10 2010 10.10.10.10
>ip host R11 2011 10.10.10.10
>ip host R12 2012 10.10.10.10
>ip host R13 2013 10.10.10.10
>ip host R14 2014 10.10.10.10
>ip host R15 2015 10.10.10.10
>ip host R16 2016 10.10.10.10
>ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
>!
>line con 0
>line 1 16
>transport input telnet
>line vty 0 4
>password
>login
>!
>end
>
>CS#
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41795&t=41760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CS-516 Terminal Server Issues [7:41760]
You may want to try the no-exec under your line con 0
Maybe there's a bunch of noise of the line from the other boxes trying
to establish a connection.
Just a thought.
Tim
On 17 Apr 2002 14:20:12 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Tim Lovelace")
wrote:
>I finally have gotten back around to getting my CS-516 back up and
>working, and I am having a problem..
>
>To actually connect to a console takes somewhere in the area of 5
>minutes, I hope that is not normal. Also, many times I get "Connection
>refused by remote host" although I could connect 20 minutes before and I
>can still consol in with my laptop fine. Below is a sh ver and wr term.
>If anyone has any advice, please let me know. Thanks for the help.
>
>Tim
>
>CS#sh ver
>CS Software (CS500-KR), Version 9.21(3), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
>Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems, Inc.
>Compiled Tue 03-May-94 16:25 by jyang
>
>ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 4.7(3), RELEASE SOFTWARE
>
>CS uptime is 1 hour, 55 minutes
>System restarted by reload
>System image file is unknown, booted via tty1
>
>Cisco-CS500 (68331) processor with 10240K bytes of memory.
>SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
>1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface.
>16 terminal lines.
>32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
>Configuration register is 0x101
>
>CS#wr term
>##
>Current configuration:
>!
>version 9.21
>no service pad
>!
>hostname CS
>!
>enable password XX
>!
>ip routing
>no ip domain-lookup
>!
>interface Loopback0
>ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.0
>!
>interface Ethernet0
>ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 255.255.255.0
>!
>ip host R9 2009 10.10.10.10
>ip host R7 2007 10.10.10.10
>ip host R8 2008 10.10.10.10
>ip host R1 2001 10.10.10.10
>ip host R2 2002 10.10.10.10
>ip host R3 2003 10.10.10.10
>ip host R4 2004 10.10.10.10
>ip host R5 2005 10.10.10.10
>ip host R6 2006 10.10.10.10
>ip host R10 2010 10.10.10.10
>ip host R11 2011 10.10.10.10
>ip host R12 2012 10.10.10.10
>ip host R13 2013 10.10.10.10
>ip host R14 2014 10.10.10.10
>ip host R15 2015 10.10.10.10
>ip host R16 2016 10.10.10.10
>ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
>!
>line con 0
>line 1 16
>transport input telnet
>line vty 0 4
>password
>login
>!
>end
>
>CS#
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41787&t=41760
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IE Written [7:41320]
Sorry if I seem negative but what does it matter what "we" think? If this is something you want, why not go get it? If you think that it'll put you in a more marketable position (i'm sure it will, even in Dallas) than why not do it. Not to mention, it's all about the knowledge man! (especially now that the industry pay has gone to the birds) Tim On 13 Apr 2002 02:39:36 -0400, in groupstudy.cisco you wrote: >I hope no one jumps on me about this but I am in Dallas and as most of you >know the market here is horrible. And that is an understatement. I am >wanting to go for my IE written in about 3 months but I only have a year of >experience. I know that is not enough by Cisco standards but it may be my >only option right now for another job. What do ya'll(had to throw that in) >think my chances are? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41352&t=41320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ping times? Am i missing something [7:41151]
Okay, I'm much clearer on this now. So in reality, the IP TTL
doesn't really measure anything anymore, we just need to make sure our
routers decrement it so that a box getting an IP packet with 0 will
discard it any not let it float around the networka aimlessly.
Thanks for the help. Much appreciated!
Tim
On 11 Apr 2002 13:54:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Priscilla
Oppenheimer") wrote:
>Timoue (timeout!? ;-)
>
>IP TTL is a reverse hop count. The sender sets it to some large number like
>255 or 64 or 32 (depending on the OS). Each router decrements it by one. If
>that causes the TTL to become zero, then the packet is dead. The router
>discards it. The goal is to stop a packet from travelling around an
>internetwork forever, which could happen if there were a routing loop.
>
>Originally, the IP designers also envisioned that the TTL could be a rough
>measurement of time. A router could decrement the TTL by more than one if
>it took more than one second to handle the frame. The router could
>decrement the TTL by the number of seconds it took to work on the frame.
>These days if a router took more than a second to forward a frame, you
>would pull the plug and use it as a boat anchor.
>
>Some protocol analyzers still show the TTL value as hops/seconds. I think
>the Sniffer still does this. It's misleading for two reasons. No routers
>use seconds anymore, and the hops/seconds makes it look like a ratio. Ugh.
>
>One more comment, you were worried about 15,000 milliseconds. Remember
>that's only 15 seconds. So if the TTL were measured in seconds, 255 would
>be much bigger.
>
>By the way, my ping using 3600 seconds on my Albany router (see my previous
>reply) is still sitting there!
>
>Priscilla
>
>
>At 02:58 AM 4/11/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Ouellette) wrote:
>>Okay, so ICMP doens't specify a TTL on it's own. Doesn't IP by itself
>>have a TTL of 255?
>>
>>Maybe i'm missing something.
>>
>>Tim
>>
>>On 11 Apr 2002 01:26:56 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Joseph
>>Ezerski") wrote:
>>
>> >Ok, according to Stevens (TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 1), the ICMP Ping Packet
>> >looks like this:
>> >
>> >
>> >0 1 2 3
>> >0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> > | Type | Code | Checksum |
>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> > | Identifier | Sequence Number |
>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> > | Optional Data|
>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> >
>> >The RFC 792, does not specify a time value, other than IP TTL (at that
>time,
>> >assumed to be in units of seconds). I think it really depends on how
your
>> >OS has implemented it. For example, on my Windows PC, the default
timeout
>> >is 2000ms. However, there is an option you can set (-w in the windows
>> >world) to extend that timeout. Stevens mentions something about newer
>UNIX
>> >implementations (as of the early 90s) timing out after 20 seconds. My
>> >Solaris box times out after 20 s, and it is listed in the man pages as
>such.
>> >
>> >HTH
>> >
>> >-Joe
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> >Ouellette, Tim
>> >Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:13 PM
>> >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> >Subject: Ping times? Am i missing something
>> >
>> >
>> >The other day while troubleshooting an issue, I saw some pings from out
>> >Tivoli Netview box and it was showing ping times in the 15,000+ ms range.
>Is
>> >this possible? I though there was a limit on this particular field in the
>> >head. If an of our frame-format experts (Priscilla?) or sniffer gurus
>> >(again... Priscilla?), could point me someone I'd appreciate it. Thanks
a
>> >bunch!
>> >_
>> >Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
>> >Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
>
>
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41242&t=41151
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ping times? Am i missing something [7:41151]
Okay, so ICMP doens't specify a TTL on it's own. Doesn't IP by itself
have a TTL of 255?
Maybe i'm missing something.
Tim
On 11 Apr 2002 01:26:56 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Joseph
Ezerski") wrote:
>Ok, according to Stevens (TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 1), the ICMP Ping Packet
>looks like this:
>
>
>0 1 2 3
>0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> | Type | Code | Checksum |
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> | Identifier | Sequence Number |
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> | Optional Data|
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>The RFC 792, does not specify a time value, other than IP TTL (at that time,
>assumed to be in units of seconds). I think it really depends on how your
>OS has implemented it. For example, on my Windows PC, the default timeout
>is 2000ms. However, there is an option you can set (-w in the windows
>world) to extend that timeout. Stevens mentions something about newer UNIX
>implementations (as of the early 90s) timing out after 20 seconds. My
>Solaris box times out after 20 s, and it is listed in the man pages as such.
>
>HTH
>
>-Joe
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Ouellette, Tim
>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:13 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: Ping times? Am i missing something
>
>
>The other day while troubleshooting an issue, I saw some pings from out
>Tivoli Netview box and it was showing ping times in the 15,000+ ms range. Is
>this possible? I though there was a limit on this particular field in the
>head. If an of our frame-format experts (Priscilla?) or sniffer gurus
>(again... Priscilla?), could point me someone I'd appreciate it. Thanks a
>bunch!
>_
>Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
>Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41160&t=41151
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change the Bridge ID on a cat5k [7:41157]
set cam {dynamic | static | permanent} {unicast_mac | multicast_mac |
route_descr} mod_num/port_nums [vlan]
Could that be it? I don't have a cat5k to check this on?
On 11 Apr 2002 02:31:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Timothy Ouellette")
wrote:
>Scouring cisco for an answer that someone mentioned.
>
>I'm trying to change the Bridge-ID (BID) for a particular vlan on a
>cat5k. I know it's possible if I just change the priorty for that
>particular vlan. Is it possible to change the mac address on a vlan so
>that the BID will change without change the prioty. Here's the question
>that was posed "how does one change the bridge ID for VLAN 200 on a
>Catalyst 5000 (os is 5.5(10)b"
>
>Can anyone help?
>
>Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41159&t=41157
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ubr924 for ccie voip lab? [7:36756]
I was browsing the endless pages on ebay looking for a good deal for more "shtuff" for my home ccie lab. Saw an auction for a cisco ubr924 that went for like $200 or so. Supposedly it's a cable modem with 4 built in ethernet ports, and two voice ports (per the url below). It runs IOS too. Would this work for playing with VOIP in a home lab? Any recommendations would be great. Thanks team! http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/900/prodlit/ubr92_ds.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36756&t=36756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP metrics [7:36596]
Chuck,
Wouldn't it be safer to say that if a BGP speaking router learns a
prefix from a peer that doesn't have an AS-path attribute (what you
referenced as being originated from) then it is IBGP because bgp
won't tag it's own as-path onto a prefix until it tries to go over a
ebgp connectiong. Furthermore, when you set up your 'neighbor x.x.x.x
remote-as yyy' your pretty much defining that routes learned from that
neighbor are ibgp (if that yyy is the same as your yyy) or ebgp (if
they're different).
Tim
On 27 Feb 2002 01:35:07 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Chuck") wrote:
>how does the router know? I would imagine the router OS checks the BGP
>origin. If I am AS 559 and I receive a BGP route that originates in AS 559,
>it is either iBGP, or I have a loop. If AS 559 is the only AS in the AS
>path, it follows that it is an iBGP route, and therefore is assigned an AD
>of 200.
>
>make sense?
>
>
>
>""Thom Castognalia"" wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> How does a router assign an iBGP AD vs. an eBGP AD? The iBGP AD is less
>> preferred than EIGRP and the other interior RPs, is that correct? (one
>week
>> until R&S qual. exam)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36753&t=36596
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about the CCIE groupstudy - Is there a moderator? [7:16234]
Hello all. I have recently passed the tried to join the CCIE lab groupstudy by sending an email stating my lab date and the time I passed the written but I haven't heard anything back about it. Is there a moderator of it, hopefully they "hang out" here too and will see this message. Thanks a bunch. TIm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16234&t=16234 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written today [7:14284]
Hello all. I just passed my CCIE today (very happy). I was not as difficult as I expected (possibly over studied for it, if that's possible). Anyways, I am about to embark on the long journey to complete the CCIE by taking the lab. I have my own home lab and I was wondering if there is a free version of Tacacs+ out there? I know cisco has a Unix version they supply but I don't run Unix here at home (win2k for my lab) and I was wondering if anyone could help. Thanks for your time! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14284&t=14284 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: administrator password problem [7:8913]
If you do a search on a security related site you can find a tool to
dump the SAM database in NT and then you will be able to "retrieve"
the administrator password.
On 17 Jun 2001 23:18:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("parky chan")
wrote:
>Dear all Expert
>can you help me solve this problem?
>if i don't know the administrator password (N.T.)
>but i need to use admin right to do something
>what can i do?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8914&t=8913
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detroit Area CCIE Study Partner [7:7969]
Paul,
I'm over in Windsor and I work in Troy. I wouldn't mind having a
partner to prepare for the CCIE lab. I just passed CID on friday, and
taking the written in about 3 weeks. I have 6 routers here and a POTS
teltone simulator. Send me an email if your interested
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take care.
On 11 Jun 2001 09:57:38 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("CCIE Wanna BE")
wrote:
>I have a Dec 16 Lab date, and am looking for a study
>partner.
>
>I have the following in my home lab:
>
>5509 w/24 port 10/100 blade
>7500
>7000
>(5) 2500's
>
>Please let me know if you live in the Metro Detroit
>area...
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>=
>Paul M. Immo CCDP CCNP MCSE
>___
>Imagination is more important than knowledge
>Albert Einstein
>
>__
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
>a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8911&t=7969
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID Test. [7:8909]
Hello group I just thought i'd let some of you folks know how my CID test went on friday. 100 questions and need a 755 to pass. I passed but I couldn't believe how poorly worded some of the questions on this test were. I mean, do the cisco guys review these questions and try to answer them? Not only were old technologies (SNA, TR) tested heavily but I found on some questions it wasn't the point of picking the correct answer, but more like picking the answer that's the least wrong. Just a tidbit for you guys studying. Take care. Onto ccie written for me. Tons of reading ahead. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8909&t=8909 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pass BCRAN low [7:6226]
I agree. That is a very good book for understanding many
technologies. The writing is good, the material is thorough.
Tim
On 29 May 2001 20:08:03 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Michael L.
Williams") wrote:
>Here is a book that is excellent. it explains ISDN, Frame, and ATM is a
>way that I've not seen elsewhere. Has excellent "Spot the issues"
>exercises. The very first "Spot the issues" exercise has 45 (small)
>paragraphs, each one discussing a separate issue with a single network.
>Very thorough
>
>It's called Cisco Certification: Bridging, Switching, and Routing for CCIE
>ISBN# 0130903892
>
> http://www.bookpool.com/.x/hop8759eb1/ss/1?qs=0130903892
>
>It goes for $63 at Borders (retail is $70), but you can pick it up for
>$44.50 at www.bookpool.com (follow the above link). Even with FedEx 2 day
>shipping it was only $51 for me. Great deal on a great book.
>
>Mike W.
>
>
>"thinkworker" wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Today I passed BCRAN. I got a low mark of 785 which 706 for pass.
>>
>> I use the Sybex book and found there is quite something the book not
>> covered. There is nothing more material than CCO.
>>
>> Is there any good recommandation for CCIE written? Is Sybex books good?
>>
>> Thanks!
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6375&t=6226
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: external modem on 2500 router [7:6355]
line aux 0
modem InOut
transport input all
rxspeed 38400
txspeed 38400
stopbits 1
flowcontrol hardware
That's pretty much all there is to it. I have a couple of 2501's with
external USR 33.6 modems hung off of them to practice DDR with a
teltone tls-4 pots simulator. Works great.
Tim
On 29 May 2001 23:58:54 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("jim terry")
wrote:
>Can an external modem be attached to the Aux port of a router with a console
>cable? If so, what is the port number for it that I would telnet to?
>
>Thanks,
>
>JT
>
>
>
>
>
>___
>Send a cool gift with your E-Card
>http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6374&t=6355
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding Reverse Telnet [7:5999]
Thanks for the insight!I'm aware of how to use the aux port to
connect modems. I'm using that scenario with 2 external modems and a
teltone POTS simulator to do DDR. Works pretty good.
Tim
On 29 May 2001 11:22:31 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Hire, Ejay")
wrote:
>Reverse telnet allows you to connect a modem or any serial device to the AUX
>port or Async port of a Router and telnet to the modem or serial device. An
>example of this in real life is... If a company has branch offices with a
>Catalyst 2924XL switch and a 2620 router. You can connect the 2924 switches
>Console port to the Aux port of the 2620 (may/probably require adapter, see
>CCO). In this example, with the 2620 having an IP of 10.0.0.1, the
>following command would connect you to the console port of the 2924
>telnet 10.0.0.1 2001 (Actually, I think on a 2620, the Aux port starts
>at 64, so the command would be telnet 10.0.0.1 2065) But anyway, you kind
>of get the idea. The Aux port can also be connected to a modem and you can
>reverse telnet to the modem... (Great for calling those out-of-state
>BBS's... "yes boss, I was testing!") and unrelated to Reverse telnet, you
>can configure an aux-port modem for ddr... But we'll save that discussion
>for another day.
>
>Ejay Hire
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Ouellette) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 8:50 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Question regarding Reverse Telnet [7:5999]
>
>
>Thanks for being a good group of informed people, it really benefits
>people like me who can absorb knowledge from you folks.
>
>My question is:
>
>Does anyone have a simple way of describing reverse telnet. I've read
>up on it and I do understand the port numbers started at 2000 and some
>of the configuration steps to setup a cisco 2509-2512. However I am
>just wondering if maybe someone could put it in plain english how it
>works so I can really understand it. Thanks a bunch!
>
>Tim
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6276&t=5999
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Books ? [7:6058]
I used the CCNP preparation library to study towards the CCNP. Each
book in this series maps very well to the exam outline. I also used
the vast library at cisco.com to solidify any doubts. Also, the boson
tests help keep my mind sharp as to all the "little" details that you
may get hit with while taking each exam. Do a search on bookpool.com
for this series as I found their prices to be much better than some of
the other vendors online. Hope this helped.
Tim
On 27 May 2001 04:08:36 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Taufik A Lubis")
wrote:
>I have a planning to prepare CCNP test (WAN Switching , Routing and
>
>etc) ... but i just know books from sybex does anybody know about the
>
>others books about CCNP material tests ? which one better ?
>
> Thanks for informations
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6156&t=6058
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question regarding Reverse Telnet [7:5999]
Thanks for being a good group of informed people, it really benefits people like me who can absorb knowledge from you folks. My question is: Does anyone have a simple way of describing reverse telnet. I've read up on it and I do understand the port numbers started at 2000 and some of the configuration steps to setup a cisco 2509-2512. However I am just wondering if maybe someone could put it in plain english how it works so I can really understand it. Thanks a bunch! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5999&t=5999 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIF Fields Explained? [7:5350]
I am looking for a document to understand in greater detail and ease of how to Read a RIF field. I've read a paper written by someone on TR Rif fields and was wondering if cisco.com had a link on it. Could someone please let me know. Thank ya much! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5350&t=5350 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detroit Area Cisco User Group [7:4870]
Does this users group have a u usenet feed or something. Maybe a
webpage I can find out a little more information. I am in the detroit
area and wouldn't mind speaking with other cisco professionals.
Tim
On 17 May 2001 13:31:30 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("CCIE Wanna BE")
wrote:
>Come to the Great Lakes
> Cisco Users Group -
> 18th Monthly Meeting
>
>All interested individuals are invited.
>Become part of the only Detroit based Cisco Users
>Group.
>Topic: Network Management
> Application
>Presented by: Visionael
>Date: Wednesday May 30, 2001
>Location:Compuware Cafeteria
>Time: 6:30 PM
>Attendance: Everyone is welcomed
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4942&t=4870
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detroit Area Cisco User Group [7:4870]
Just wondering if there was a webpage or something for this group. I'd
be interested in taking a look.
Tim
On 17 May 2001 13:31:30 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("CCIE Wanna BE")
wrote:
>Come to the Great Lakes
> Cisco Users Group -
> 18th Monthly Meeting
>
>All interested individuals are invited.
>Become part of the only Detroit based Cisco Users
>Group.
>Topic: Network Management
> Application
>Presented by: Visionael
>Date: Wednesday May 30, 2001
>Location:Compuware Cafeteria
>Time: 6:30 PM
>Attendance: Everyone is welcomed
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4941&t=4870
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID Exam - Information? [7:4341]
I recently read the cisco course book (CID 2.0) and found that most of the topics discussed were a review of mosttly routing/desktop protocols. I have just started the Sybex CID book and it follows the same. I was wondering if both of these materials cover all the "stuff" that I would need to know for this exam. Could anyone point me to some URL's on Cisco that really help for this test or maybe even some pointers (without breaking the NDA *grin*) Thanks so much. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4341&t=4341 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Parter in Detroit/Windsor Area [7:4340]
I will be taking my CCIE written in about 1 months time however I have already acquired most of the hardware (6 routers) in order to tackle the CCIE. If there is anyone in the Detroit area that would like to team up please send me an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks and good luck everyone! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4340&t=4340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test [7:4091]
Sorry for interupting the flow of information here. I'm trying to get my Agent newsreader all setup and tested. Please let me know if you see this. Thanks for your time. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4091&t=4091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
