CCDA [7:13826]
I got some questions regarding to this exam. Currently, I passed BSCN and BCMSN 2 weeks ago. And I am planning to take CID as soon as I am done with CCNP. Is CCDA exam hard? Will I be able to do this right now without spending too much time to study? I am in the networking field almost 4 years. Thanks!!! Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13826&t=13826 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remote Access question [7:14875]
Hi! I am doing my exam practice on Remote Access. I don't think the answer is correct. But I would like to hear some feedback from you guys. Thanks in advance! The eight interesting signal pins on an RS-232 connection can be group into the following categories by their functionality. (Choose all that apply) A. Data transfer group B. Hardware flow control group C. Modem control group D. Data control group I believe the answers are A, B and C. However, the practice exam said the correct answers are A, B, C and D. Thanks, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14875&t=14875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can NE 1 recommend me @ CCNP - Remote Access Exam Books [7:15324]
I passed BCRAN 2 hours ago with 887. I used BCRAN book from Cisco Press. Make sure you know all the router models in differences, ie. 2500 series is a fixed configuration and you can't upgrade. Also, make sure you know most of the dialer commands and how to debug. 62 questions in my exam and there is about 20 questions on the command line, 25 questions on ISDN + Frame Relay and remaining are T1, UTRS references point, aaa, tacaus+ and X.25. Good luck! Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kanthimathi R Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can NE 1 recommend me @ CCNP - Remote Access Exam Books [7:15246] hi, Can NE 1 recommend me @ CCNP - Remote Access Exam Books & model test sources Thanks, R.Kanthimathi Software Engineer > Infosys - COMMUNICATION & PRODUCT SERVICES > > Powered by intellect. Driven by values. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15324&t=15324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NM-2W (no Lan) for 2610, Is it supported ? [7:15563]
Yes, it is supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NM-2W (no Lan) for 2610, Is it supported ? [7:15563] Hi group !! Can someone pls tell me if the NM-2W Module (w no Lan) is supported on the 2610 ??? If so, I have an NM-1E (for 3600 series) module that i'm looking to possibly trade for the NM-2w, for a 2610. Thanks in advance.. Randy GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15565&t=15563 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Supervisor II with what type of memory? [7:15584]
Hi, What type of memory does the Supervisor Engine II use? EDO or Fast Page? Thanks, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15584&t=15584 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datalink connectivity issue... a very interesting problem!!! [7:15944]
Hi all, I got a weird issue today in my company lab. I set up 3 OSPF areas. Area 0 consists of 4 routers (ABR). There are no backbone routers. And they are connected via Frame Relay translating over ATM in fully mesh configuration. I label router 1, 2, 3 and 4. Router 1 connected to Area 1 router, Router 2 connected to Area 2 router, Router 3 connected to Area 3 router and Router 4 connected to the internal office LAN. This set up was working fine last Friday. Every interface on those routers can ping each other. A workstation from the internal office LAN can ping all the lab routers interfaces. However, this morning, I lost Area 1. area 2 router area 3 router || Router 2-Router 3 | \/ | | \ / | |ATM | | / \ | | /\ | Router 4-Router 1 || internal LANarea 1 router On Router 1, I have 2 interfaces which are T1 and e0/0. On the T1 interface, I define 3 subinterfaces and are connecting to ATM, Router 4 and Router 3. The e0/0 has the IP 172.16.1.2/30. On area 1 router has faste0/0 and IP 172.16.1.1/30. Both Ethernet ports on area 1 router and Router 1 are connected with Extreme Switch (Vlan 1). When I do sh int on Router 1 and area 1 router, line + protocol on both Ethernet interfaces are up. However, 172.16.1.2 can't ping 172.16.1.1!!?!?!? And 172.16.1.1 can't ping 172.16.1.2!?!? If those IPs are up, I assume there is a connectivity on layer 2. I shutdown both interfaces and brought them up. It doesn't work. I thought may be because one Ethernet interface is a fast Ethernet and there is problem with duplexing. I turn off full duplex on both interfaces and it still doesn't work. The Vlan 1 configuration is good on the Extreme Switch. So here is my $64,000 question. What went wrong?! Thanks, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15944&t=15944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Used Rack [7:15897]
Why buy used 19" Rack if you can afford $400? http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=AR202&langu age=en&LOCAL.APCCountryCode=US Check the latest pricing on www.cnet.com. The lowest price I found is about $370. Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ray Smith Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Used Rack [7:15897] Anyone with a used 19" Network Rack in good condition to unload at a reasonable price, preferable in the New York/NJ area for the purpose of saving on shipping & handling? Thanks _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15945&t=15897 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883]
on the Cisco routers compare to lanblvd.com. Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] These guys have good prices on Cisco equipment... http://www.lanblvd.com I have bought 3 x 3548's and 1 x 2924 there so far, and I haven't had anything to complain about. They are (should you search on http://www.cnet.com) most often the cheapest Cisco on-line store out there. I am fixing to buy a bunch more this week. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] list pricing is pretty much readily available. true, the public tools on CCO do not provide list pricing. instead they refer you to a Cisco reseller. But all anyone has to do is ask, and most places I have dealt with have never had a problem divulging list. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Donald B Johnson jr Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] Thats impossible or highly not recommended, most of us here work for a partner and pricing has a lot to do with your partner status. A general price list could be obtained by Cisco. They will be happy to send someone out. - Original Message - From: "Shahir Boshra" To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:17 AM Subject: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] > Hello Group, > > Sorry for the Off topic posting, but I desperately need an updated Cisco > price list. Can anyone please send it offline? > Thanks in advance > Shahir Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15946&t=15883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883]
Ooops, looks like the message was cut off. http://www.lanstreet.com is about $100-$200 cheaper on those Cisco routers compared to http://www.lanblvd.com . Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Albert Y. Pak Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] on the Cisco routers compare to lanblvd.com. Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] These guys have good prices on Cisco equipment... http://www.lanblvd.com I have bought 3 x 3548's and 1 x 2924 there so far, and I haven't had anything to complain about. They are (should you search on http://www.cnet.com) most often the cheapest Cisco on-line store out there. I am fixing to buy a bunch more this week. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] list pricing is pretty much readily available. true, the public tools on CCO do not provide list pricing. instead they refer you to a Cisco reseller. But all anyone has to do is ask, and most places I have dealt with have never had a problem divulging list. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Donald B Johnson jr Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] Thats impossible or highly not recommended, most of us here work for a partner and pricing has a lot to do with your partner status. A general price list could be obtained by Cisco. They will be happy to send someone out. - Original Message - From: "Shahir Boshra" To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:17 AM Subject: Off Topic: Cisco Price List [7:15883] > Hello Group, > > Sorry for the Off topic posting, but I desperately need an updated Cisco > price list. Can anyone please send it offline? > Thanks in advance > Shahir Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15947&t=15883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Datalink connectivity issue... a very interesting [7:15960]
Hi Priscilla, I checked everything that I could... IP addresses (no duplication), cables, switch port LEDs, VLAN configuration (I even switched with a regular switch without VLAN configured), hard code full duplex on both ends, remove auto negotiation between router port and the switch port... Whatever you have suggested in here I have done it all at least twice. I don't see errors when I did sh int e0/0 and sh int faste0/0. That is the weird part of all This problem gets my "rear end" kicked hard! I will look into it again. Hopefully, I will resolve this issue. And I will definitely let you know. This is an interesting problem, isn't it? IP addresses and both interfaces + protocols are up but you can't ping each other. WEIRD!! Thanks, Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 10:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Datalink connectivity issue... a very interesting [7:15960] What does "show int ethernet" on Router 1 and "show int fa" on Area 1 Router show? Lots of errors? You say you turned off full duplex. On the routers or on the switches? You may want to hard code duplex on both ends of the connection, (although sometimes that doesn't work either. ;-) It seems like it could be an auto negotiation problem. Note that the negotiation occurs between R1 and its switch port. A separate negotiation occurs between Area 1 Router and its switch port. (Sorry if that's obvious, but your wording made it sound like you thought those two separate connections could affect each other.) A show int will help you determine if there's a problem. You'll see lots of collisions, late collisions, FCS errors, etc. You say VLAN 1 configuration is OK. Question your assumption. ;-) Can you do some testing without VLANs? Other theories are going to just be guesses because we don't have enough info, but check that the IP addresses and masks are really what you say they are and that the addresses don't belong to some other devices (duplicate IP addresses). It's annoying when you get a complicated network like you describe working and then some simple thing goes wrong, eh? Can you let us know what you find out? Thanks. Priscilla At 08:26 PM 8/13/01, Albert Y. Pak wrote: >Hi all, >I got a weird issue today in my company lab. I set up 3 OSPF areas. Area 0 >consists of 4 routers (ABR). There are no backbone routers. And they are >connected via Frame Relay translating over ATM in fully mesh configuration. >I label router 1, 2, 3 and 4. Router 1 connected to Area 1 router, Router 2 >connected to Area 2 router, Router 3 connected to Area 3 router and Router 4 >connected to the internal office LAN. This set up was working fine last >Friday. Every interface on those routers can ping each other. A workstation >from the internal office LAN can ping all the lab routers interfaces. >However, this morning, I lost Area 1. > > > area 2 router area 3 router > || > Router 2-Router 3 >| \/ | >| \ / | >|ATM | > | / \ | > | /\ | > Router 4-Router 1 > || > internal LANarea 1 router > >On Router 1, I have 2 interfaces which are T1 and e0/0. On the T1 interface, >I define 3 subinterfaces and are connecting to ATM, Router 4 and Router 3. >The e0/0 has the IP 172.16.1.2/30. On area 1 router has faste0/0 and IP >172.16.1.1/30. Both Ethernet ports on area 1 router and Router 1 are >connected with Extreme Switch (Vlan 1). >When I do sh int on Router 1 and area 1 router, line + protocol on both >Ethernet interfaces are up. However, 172.16.1.2 can't ping 172.16.1.1!!?!?!? >And 172.16.1.1 can't ping 172.16.1.2!?!? If those IPs are up, I assume there >is a connectivity on layer 2. I shutdown both interfaces and brought them >up. It doesn't work. I thought may be because one Ethernet interface is a >fast Ethernet and there is problem with duplexing. I turn off full duplex on >both interfaces and it still doesn't work. The Vlan 1 configuration is good >on the Extreme Switch. >So here is my $64,000 question. What went wrong?! >Thanks, >Albert Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15965&t=15960 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccna question [7:15958]
The current theory is 80/20. However, to pass CCNA exam, the answer is 70/30. ;-) HTH Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ccna question [7:15958] much as I hate to pass this one, because every response will hit the moderator's queue (braindump is a forbidden word), I thought this an honest question and that you were entitled to an answer. 80/20 or 70/30 what? are you referring to the old "80 percent of your LAN traffic should be local, and 20 percent should be non-local" rule of good design? I haven't seen the recent Cisco study materials, but from other reading, I believe that current theory is that you can't go by this rule any longer. Internet access, shared services, centralized server farms, intranets, all have kinda blown all this local traffic versus non-local traffic percentages by the wayside. to transform a phrase of Brian Eno's - the one Scott McNealy probably stole. I know I sure did - the world is now the LAN. Chuck Eno: the recording studio is my synthesizer ( circa 1980 ) McNealy: the network is the computer ( circa 1996 ) Me: the telco network is the central office ( circa 1990 ) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Manjunath Shivaramaiah Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ccna question [7:15958] hi i have a doubt regarding lan design in ciscoIt is 80/20 or70/30 ..in braindumps and 604-407 books it says it is 70/30...pl help me in this regard... I'm taking ccna exam shortly thanks manjunath.s Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15968&t=15958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Datalink connectivity issue... a very interesting [7:15960]
One of the bogus interfaces on a 2621 router was causing the problem (area 1 router)! As soon as I swapped the router, everything worked fine! UNBELIEVABLE! Thanks to all who had suggested regarding to this problem. Thanks again! Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Datalink connectivity issue... a very interesting [7:15960] Sounds like an ARP problem to me...did the ARP caches on both routers show both IP addresses? If so, did the MAC addresses resolve correctly? -e- - Original Message - From: Albert Y. Pak To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:42 PM Subject: RE: Datalink connectivity issue... a very interesting [7:15960] > Hi Priscilla, > I checked everything that I could... IP addresses (no duplication), cables, > switch port LEDs, VLAN configuration (I even switched with a regular switch > without VLAN configured), hard code full duplex on both ends, remove auto > negotiation between router port and the switch port... Whatever you have > suggested in here I have done it all at least twice. I don't see errors when > I did sh int e0/0 and sh int faste0/0. That is the weird part of all > This problem gets my "rear end" kicked hard! > I will look into it again. Hopefully, I will resolve this issue. And I will > definitely let you know. > This is an interesting problem, isn't it? IP addresses and both interfaces + > protocols are up but you can't ping each other. > > WEIRD!! > > Thanks, > Albert > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Priscilla Oppenheimer > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 10:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Datalink connectivity issue... a very interesting [7:15960] > > > What does "show int ethernet" on Router 1 and "show int fa" on Area 1 > Router show? Lots of errors? You say you turned off full duplex. On the > routers or on the switches? You may want to hard code duplex on both ends > of the connection, (although sometimes that doesn't work either. ;-) > > It seems like it could be an auto negotiation problem. Note that the > negotiation occurs between R1 and its switch port. A separate negotiation > occurs between Area 1 Router and its switch port. (Sorry if that's obvious, > but your wording made it sound like you thought those two separate > connections could affect each other.) A show int will help you determine if > there's a problem. You'll see lots of collisions, late collisions, FCS > errors, etc. > > You say VLAN 1 configuration is OK. Question your assumption. ;-) Can you > do some testing without VLANs? > > Other theories are going to just be guesses because we don't have enough > info, but check that the IP addresses and masks are really what you say > they are and that the addresses don't belong to some other devices > (duplicate IP addresses). > > It's annoying when you get a complicated network like you describe working > and then some simple thing goes wrong, eh? Can you let us know what you > find out? Thanks. > > Priscilla > > At 08:26 PM 8/13/01, Albert Y. Pak wrote: > >Hi all, > >I got a weird issue today in my company lab. I set up 3 OSPF areas. Area 0 > >consists of 4 routers (ABR). There are no backbone routers. And they are > >connected via Frame Relay translating over ATM in fully mesh configuration. > >I label router 1, 2, 3 and 4. Router 1 connected to Area 1 router, Router 2 > >connected to Area 2 router, Router 3 connected to Area 3 router and Router > 4 > >connected to the internal office LAN. This set up was working fine last > >Friday. Every interface on those routers can ping each other. A workstation > >from the internal office LAN can ping all the lab routers interfaces. > >However, this morning, I lost Area 1. > > > > > > area 2 router area 3 router > > || > > Router 2-Router 3 > >| \/ | > >| \ / | > >|ATM | > > | / \ | > > | /\ | > > Router 4-Router 1 > > || > > internal LANarea 1 router > > > >On Router 1, I have 2 interfaces which are T1 and e0/0. On the T1 > interface, > >I define 3 subinterfaces and are connecting to ATM, Router 4 and Router 3. > >The e0/0 has the IP 172.16.1.2/30. On area 1 router has faste0/0 and IP > >172.16.1.1/30. Both Ethernet ports on area 1 router and Router 1 are > >connected with Extreme Switch (Vlan 1
How to erase all the previous configuration on Cat [7:18876]
Hi all, Recently, I purchased a Supervisor Engine II on eBay. And I would like to erase all the previous configuration. How do I do that? I have searched on Cisco web site but I don't find any documentations. Thanks, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18876&t=18876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network monitoring tools [7:19597]
Micromuse's Netcool Network Management Suite. http://www.micromuse.com/products/product_information.html HTH Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duncan Stuart Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network monitoring tools [7:19597] Hi People, Can anyone recommend a network monitoring tool that also provides a good reporting facility. Most of the monitored technology is Cisco. regards Duncan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19616&t=19597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20036]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20036&t=20036 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20039]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20039&t=20039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20038]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20038&t=20038 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20037]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20037&t=20037 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20043]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20043&t=20043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20041]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20041&t=20041 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20040]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20040&t=20040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20042]
Hi All, I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as I install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System Bootstrap (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash are identical. Please advise, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20042&t=20042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20043]
Thanks for your help. And yes, I was trying to use the flash memory from 2600/3600 series routers. No wonder why it didn't work. :-) Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20043] Yes, I should probably look more closely before responding :( Dave EA Louie wrote: > > ahhh, I didn't notice that until you pointed it out. thanks > > -e- > > - Original Message - > From: "Circusnuts" > To: "EA Louie" ; > Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 5:35 AM > Subject: Re: Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20043] > > > Na- the ROM's he has listed here are 11.0 (10c). They're the newest > > available. I still think he trying to use 2600/3600/4000 FLASH. > > > > Phil > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "EA Louie" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 6:59 AM > > Subject: Re: Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20043] > > > > > > > Agreed (I think). Remove the 2nd flash and post a show ver. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "MADMAN" > > > To: > > > Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 7:24 PM > > > Subject: Re: Install 2 8MB flash on Cisco 2502 [7:20043] > > > > > > > > > > It's most likely you have old boot roms that are not able to recognize > > the > > > > 16M of > > > > memory. > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > "Albert Y. Pak" wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > I am able to boot Cisco 2502 with 1 x 8MB flash. However, as soon as > I > > > > > install a second 8MB flash (empty), the router hangs at System > > Bootstrap > > > > > (Version 11.0(10c)XB1). + doesn't work either. These 2 8MB flash > > > > > are identical. > > > > > Please advise, > > > > > Albert > > > > -- > > > > David Madland > > > > CCIE# 2016 > > > > Senior Network Engineer > > > > Qwest Communications > > > > 612-664-3367 > > > _ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20236&t=20043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loopback interface [7:20949]
Hi all, What is the default speed of a loopback interface on a Cisco router? Thanks, Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20949&t=20949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Loopback interface [7:20949]
Ah, cool, thanks! Actually, I just found out the answer myself as well. Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Loopback Internet address is 10.1.11.6/32 MTU 1514 bytes, BW 800 Kbit, DLY 5000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Thanks again. Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Loopback interface [7:20949] In a message dated 9/24/01 7:15:36 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Subj: Loopback interface [7:20949] Date: 9/24/01 7:15:36 PM Central Daylight Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Albert Y. Pak) Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Albert Y. Pak) To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8000 MB Hi all, What is the default speed of a loopback interface on a Cisco router? Thanks, Albert [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20952&t=20949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: The most powerful Unix command EVER!!! [7:21771]
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21771&t=21771 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: The most powerful Unix command EVER!!! [7:21773]
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21773&t=21773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: The most powerful Unix command EVER!!! (3rd trail!!!) [7:21783]
Hi guys, I am having problems send this link out earlier... Sorry about that. Don't know who I should talk to about this. This happened to me a few times just to send out the email to this group. :-/ One last try! http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/apparel/57b2.shtml Albert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21783&t=21783 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: The most powerful Unix command EVER!!! (3rd trail!!!) [7:21969]
I would do: chmod a +x /bin/laden Hehe! Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Hoang Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT: The most powerful Unix command EVER!!! (3rd trail!!!) [7:21898] I thought the most powerful Unix command is "kill -9 /bin/laden" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leigh Anne Chisholm Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT: The most powerful Unix command EVER!!! (3rd trail!!!) [7:21882] -r is a 'recursive' flag (remove the contents of the directory recursively). -f is a 'force flag' (ignore non-existant files, never prompt). And for those that don't know, "rm" is used to remove files or directories. "/bin" is a common directory where binaries are kept... -- Leigh Anne PS. I like it! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Priscilla Oppenheimer > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OT: The most powerful Unix command EVER!!! (3rd trail!!!) > [7:21880] > > > Hee hee. That's very funny. I'm going to ask a dumb question > though. I know > what rm does. What does rm -rf do? > > Often e-mails to the group with URLs in them get filtered. I'm not sure > why. It happens especially with short e-mails when the URL is > near the top. > You just have to be patient and persistent. > > Priscilla > > At 11:14 PM 10/2/01, Albert Y. Pak wrote: > >Hi guys, > >I am having problems send this link out earlier... Sorry about > that. Don't > >know who I should talk to about this. This happened to me a few > times just > >to send out the email to this group. :-/ > > > >One last try! > >http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/apparel/57b2.shtml > > > >Albert > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21969&t=21969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601]
That's depending on the WAN side what technology you are using. If you are using Frame Relay or HDLC between the WAN side via serial link, there will be no collision. Since Frame Relay and HDLC are connection-oriented but not reliable. All the re-transmission are done by between 2 hosts of each opposite end. In case of using X.25, there will be a collision since X.25 is connection-oriented and reliable. 2 routers between the serial line will do all the re-transmission. So there will be a collision. HTH Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Luancing Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601] Is it possible to have collisions on a serial line ?? if so, what causes this? - D.L. __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24607&t=24601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121]
Ah, Netcool! I bet you must be using Omnibus v3.4. What else do you use? Visionary? Impact? Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Campbell Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121] NetCool works great and Heroix's robomon is also very good. We use both of these to monitor customer equipment. These go far more in detail than What's up Gold. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT- maybe... [7:24121] Hi All, Besides Cisco Works, anyone know of any good Cisco monitoring apps? I am looking to monitor my routers, VPN and switches. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24593&t=24121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601]
True, I wasn't reading the question right. I was thinking about if the WAN link was crack down. In that case, I believe there will be a collisions on a serial link... Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601] Whether a protocol is reliable or not has nothing to do with collisions. Collisions have to do with media access control at the data-link layer. Ethernet is not reliable. It's best effort. The only problem it monitors is collisions, (if you're using half-duplex). Cisco's HDLC is not reliable. That's not relevant as far as to whether it has collisions, however. What is relevant is its media access control, which is very simple because there's nothing else sharing its transmit circuit, so it can send whenever it wants. It's used on point-to-point circuits. X.25 is a network-layer protocol so it is not relevant to a question that is asking about a media-access control function. Priscilla At 10:57 PM 10/29/01, Albert Y. Pak wrote: >That's depending on the WAN side what technology you are using. If you are >using Frame Relay or HDLC between the WAN side via serial link, there will >be no collision. Since Frame Relay and HDLC are connection-oriented but not >reliable. All the re-transmission are done by between 2 hosts of each >opposite end. In case of using X.25, there will be a collision since X.25 is >connection-oriented and reliable. 2 routers between the serial line will do >all the re-transmission. So there will be a collision. >HTH >Albert > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Dave Luancing >Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:03 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601] > > >Is it possible to have collisions on a serial line ?? >if so, what causes this? > >- D.L. > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. >http://personals.yahoo.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24746&t=24601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601]
[ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ] [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ] [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ] True, I wasn't reading the question right. I was thinking about if the WAN link was crack down. In that case, I believe there will be a collisions on a serial link... Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601] Whether a protocol is reliable or not has nothing to do with collisions. Collisions have to do with media access control at the data-link layer. Ethernet is not reliable. It's best effort. The only problem it monitors is collisions, (if you're using half-duplex). Cisco's HDLC is not reliable. That's not relevant as far as to whether it has collisions, however. What is relevant is its media access control, which is very simple because there's nothing else sharing its transmit circuit, so it can send whenever it wants. It's used on point-to-point circuits. X.25 is a network-layer protocol so it is not relevant to a question that is asking about a media-access control function. Priscilla At 10:57 PM 10/29/01, Albert Y. Pak wrote: >That's depending on the WAN side what technology you are using. If you are >using Frame Relay or HDLC between the WAN side via serial link, there will >be no collision. Since Frame Relay and HDLC are connection-oriented but not >reliable. All the re-transmission are done by between 2 hosts of each >opposite end. In case of using X.25, there will be a collision since X.25 is >connection-oriented and reliable. 2 routers between the serial line will do >all the re-transmission. So there will be a collision. >HTH >Albert > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Dave Luancing >Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:03 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Collisions on a Serial Line [7:24601] > > >Is it possible to have collisions on a serial line ?? >if so, what causes this? > >- D.L. > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. >http://personals.yahoo.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24684&t=24601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
