Selective outages?

2001-01-23 Thread Benjamin Walling

We have a small network.  A 2620 on either side of a T1.  Computers A, B,
and C are on one side.  Computers D, E, and F are on the other side.
Sometimes, E will decide it won't communicate with C.  E can't ping C.  C
can't ping E.  E can ping A and B.  C can ping D and F.  A and B can ping D,
E, and F.  After a few minutes, E will be able to ping C.  A while later, B
will decide it can't communicate with F, and so on.

It seems to happen when the T1 hiccups (the large, well-known multinational
company we got it from can't seem to make it work consistently).  I think it
may happen if the two machines are communicating when the T1 hiccups.  I'm
not really sure on this - it is a casual observance.

Sometimes the pings will get "request timed out", and other times
"destination host unreachable".

What is causing this, and how can I prevent it?  I don't recall seeing this
in any other networks I have worked on.

Thanks,
Benjamin Walling

BTW, our T1 provider is blaming the Super Bowl (we're in Tampa) for all of
our troubles.  They say their cross connects keep getting stolen by people
hooking up lines for the Super Bowl.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Hyperterminal problem

2000-12-21 Thread Benjamin Walling

Man, that makes me feel dumb.  Apparently, Hotsync manager doesn't let
anything else use the COM port.


""Charles Henson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
91t69s$vb7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:91t69s$vb7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is anything else using com1 ie. palm software or something else. Are you
> sure it's com1 and not com2 or 3?
>
> Charles
>
> ""Benjamin Walling"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 91t5t0$tmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:91t5t0$tmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Not really a Cisco question (directly), but everyone here should have
> ample
> > experience using COM ports to get consoles
> >
> > Hyperterminal is saying 'Unable to open COM1'.  This port on this laptop
> has
> > been working fine for months, and this just started.  I've deleted the
COM
> > port in Windows, reloaded BIOS defaults, and let Windows find it again,
> but
> > it doesn't help.
> >
> > Anyone else have/solve this problem?
> >
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Hyperterminal problem

2000-12-21 Thread Benjamin Walling

Not really a Cisco question (directly), but everyone here should have ample
experience using COM ports to get consoles

Hyperterminal is saying 'Unable to open COM1'.  This port on this laptop has
been working fine for months, and this just started.  I've deleted the COM
port in Windows, reloaded BIOS defaults, and let Windows find it again, but
it doesn't help.

Anyone else have/solve this problem?


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Using modular CSU/DSU on 2600

2000-12-21 Thread Benjamin Walling

I've entered all the commands to set up the T1 service module, but when I do
a show run or show start, I don't see them (except for one line).  A show
interface shows some of the settings (ESF, B8ZS), but I'm just curious how
it keeps the settings.

Are there any useful commands for troubleshooting the T1 line through the
service module?  The manuals aren't that great, and I'm not used to having
the internal CSU.

Thanks for any help.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 19" racks for home lab

2000-12-17 Thread Benjamin Walling

I found one for $50 at a local cabling company.  They often replace racks
when doing wiring jobs, so they have some used ones sitting around.  You
might try a couple of local places that do cabling.

In article <91j8qr$njt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Can you guys tell me if you use any 19" racks for your home labs ? (Once
> the equipment starts multiplying it's hard to fit it all on a table).
> Which rack products are good/standard ? Where can I buy one from ? What
> size do you use for your home labs - 84", 48" or 66" ?
> 
> Thanks for the input,
> 
> Bharat Suneja
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and
> Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Behavior of Cisco PAT/NAT?

2000-12-11 Thread Benjamin Walling

If I set up a NAT pool of only 1 address, the router/pix uses PAT.  Under
PAT, I can have 65K hosts (or connections from hosts) connecting to the
internet.

If I set up a NAT pool of more than 1 address, the router/pix uses NAT.
Under NAT, I can have 1 host per address in the NAT pool.

Does this sound right?  I have two available address to get my users out
with.  If I put them both in a pool, will I only get two out at a time, or
will it allow 65K connections per address in the pool?  The documentation
seems fuzzy on this.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco 2500 Boot

2000-12-08 Thread Benjamin Walling

turn off hardware flow control (set it to no)

""Luke Everett"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
002101c0614a$4cb55400$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002101c0614a$4cb55400$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have 3 different Cisco 2500 routers.  When I boot them through =
> Hyperterminal I get what is below.  It does not allow me to hit enter, =
> nothing happens.  I have it configured as 9600 Baud, 8 Data Bits, parity =
> - none, 1 stop bit, flow control - hardware.  It is the same for all =
> three of the routers.  How can I get these routers running?  I know they =
> work because I have used them with a laptop before.   -=20
>
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
>
> IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 11.2(18), RELEASE SOFTWARE =
> (fc1)
>
> Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
>
> Compiled Mon 05-Apr-99 19:58 by jaturner
>
> Image text-base: 0x0302F3B0, data-base: 0x1000
>
> cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision D) with 16384K/2048K bytes of =
> memory.
>
> Processor board ID 02084157, with hardware revision 
>
> Bridging software.
>
> X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant.
>
> 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
>
> 2 Serial network interface(s)
>
> 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
>
> 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)
>
> IP multicast fastswitching not allowed on X.25 interfaces
>
> IP multicast fastswitching not allowed on X.25 interfaces
>
>
>
> Press RETURN to get started!
>
>
>
> %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up
>
> %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to down
>
> %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to down
>
> %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state =
> to down
>
> %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state =
> to down
>
> %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state =
> to down
>
> %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console
>
> %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted --
>
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
>
> IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 11.2(18), RELEASE SOFTWARE =
> (fc1)
>
> Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
>
> Compiled Mon 05-Apr-99 19:58 by jaturner
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question

2000-12-08 Thread Benjamin Walling

> The way you have written makes it sound as if I did not have DNS and I
> did a ping, telnet, or ftp by name that it would not work, and that is
> not the case.

That is not what I intended.  If you do a ping, it is not a test of whether
WINS is working because there are other ways to resolve a name that Windows
will use.  You can 'ping hostname' and get a response when you do not have
WINS working.  You can also 'ping hostname' when you do not have DNS
working.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question

2000-12-08 Thread Benjamin Walling

Absolutely.  It just makes a difference what order Windows uses to resolve.
Ping, telnet, etc will try to resolve a DNS as a DNS name.  If it fails at
this, it will use WINS/LMHosts.  So, yes you can 'telnet netbiosname'

If you just type in 'ping bob', Windows will tack on 'yourdomain.com' and
try to resolve it using DNS.  So, you are likely just resolving this with
DNS.  However, if your DNS host name and your NetBIOS name are different,
then you will use WINS to resolve this.

So, using ping will not verfiy that WINS is working, unless you use a
NetBIOS name that is not also a DNS name.  If the NetBIOS name and the DNS
host name are the same, your computer could resolve that name with DNS.  So,
you will not verify that WINS is working by pinging something where the
NetBIOS name is the same as the DNS host name.

Ben

"Joseph Ezerski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I beg to disagree with you.  I can certainly telnet, ftp and ping to any
> NETBios name on my network.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Walling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question
>
>
> Yes, WINS resolves NetBIOS names to IP addresses, but only for Windows
> networking functions.  It is not used for ping, ftp, telnet, etc.  It is
> used for name resolution with relation to file sharing, domain traffic,
etc.
>
> The order in which a Windows box will try to resolve a DNS name (what
> happens when you ping):
> Host file
> DNS
> Cache
> WINS
> Broadcast
> LMHosts
>
> The order in which a Windows box will try to resolve a NetBIOS name:
> Cache
> WINS
> Broadcast
> LMHosts
> Hosts
> DNS
> (of course you can modify the NetBIOS node type and change this)
>
> ""Frank Wells"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Name resolution is exactly what WINS does!  It maps Netbios names to IP
> > addresses.  Windows clients resolve names to IP addresses using a number
> of
> > criterion, and depending on what kind of node they are (H;B;P;M)the
order
> > that they search services and files differ.  They certainly do not need
> DNS
> > to resolve IP addresses, although it would be an inprovement over their
> > native methods.
> >
> > Take a look at RFC's 1001/1002 for deeper insight.
> >
> > BTW, RPC's are used for mapping drives etc.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Benjamin Walling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: "Benjamin Walling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question
> > >Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:27:04 -0500
> > >
> > >Pinging does not verify name resolution for WINS.  Ping will resolve a
> name
> > >using DNS.  MS uses WINS (NetBIOS naming) for Domain Logins and for
> mapping
> > >drives, etc.
> > >
> > >Try this link on Cisco's website for help with coordinating your NT
> domain
> > >with your network layout:
> > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/winnt_dg.htm
> > >
> > >It covers WINS and things like that.
> > >
> > >Ben
> > >
> > >"Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you guys for the help. Unfortunately, I tried to
> > > > put LMHOST file, still doesn't work. We use WINS and I
> > > > can ping domain controller using name so I don't think
> > > > it's naming issue.
> > > >
> > > > I used a sniffer captured some data, client is sending
> > > > logon request to domain controller but didn't get any
> > > > response. Looks like PIX blocks it. How do I open
> > > > it(port 137, 138, 139)?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jim
> > > >
> > > > --- Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Your problem is likely the propgation of
> > > > > broadcasts...  Or lack thereof.
> > > > > One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router
> > > > > before (LAN-side) the
> > > > > PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward
> > > > > UDP-level broadcasts (like
> > > > > 138/139 Netbios) to the NT 

Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question

2000-12-08 Thread Benjamin Walling

Yes, WINS resolves NetBIOS names to IP addresses, but only for Windows
networking functions.  It is not used for ping, ftp, telnet, etc.  It is
used for name resolution with relation to file sharing, domain traffic, etc.

The order in which a Windows box will try to resolve a DNS name (what
happens when you ping):
Host file
DNS
Cache
WINS
Broadcast
LMHosts

The order in which a Windows box will try to resolve a NetBIOS name:
Cache
WINS
Broadcast
LMHosts
Hosts
DNS
(of course you can modify the NetBIOS node type and change this)

""Frank Wells"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Name resolution is exactly what WINS does!  It maps Netbios names to IP
> addresses.  Windows clients resolve names to IP addresses using a number
of
> criterion, and depending on what kind of node they are (H;B;P;M)the order
> that they search services and files differ.  They certainly do not need
DNS
> to resolve IP addresses, although it would be an inprovement over their
> native methods.
>
> Take a look at RFC's 1001/1002 for deeper insight.
>
> BTW, RPC's are used for mapping drives etc.
>
>
> >From: "Benjamin Walling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Benjamin Walling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question
> >Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:27:04 -0500
> >
> >Pinging does not verify name resolution for WINS.  Ping will resolve a
name
> >using DNS.  MS uses WINS (NetBIOS naming) for Domain Logins and for
mapping
> >drives, etc.
> >
> >Try this link on Cisco's website for help with coordinating your NT
domain
> >with your network layout:
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/winnt_dg.htm
> >
> >It covers WINS and things like that.
> >
> >Ben
> >
> >"Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Thank you guys for the help. Unfortunately, I tried to
> > > put LMHOST file, still doesn't work. We use WINS and I
> > > can ping domain controller using name so I don't think
> > > it's naming issue.
> > >
> > > I used a sniffer captured some data, client is sending
> > > logon request to domain controller but didn't get any
> > > response. Looks like PIX blocks it. How do I open
> > > it(port 137, 138, 139)?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > --- Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Your problem is likely the propgation of
> > > > broadcasts...  Or lack thereof.
> > > > One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router
> > > > before (LAN-side) the
> > > > PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward
> > > > UDP-level broadcasts (like
> > > > 138/139 Netbios) to the NT server.
> > > >
> > > > The other thing you can do is bypass that broadcast
> > > > thought process by using
> > > > LMHosts files on the workstations at the branch
> > > > office.  That will pre-load
> > > > (if you use the #PRE designation) the NetBIOS cache
> > > > and give you IP
> > > > addresses to go to.  So if you have IP reachability,
> > > > things will work just
> > > > fine then.
> > > >
> > > > In LMHOSTS. :
> > > >
> > > > (ip address) (Netbios name) #PRE #DOM:(domain name
> > > > if domain controller)
> > > >
> > > > Also, to refresh without rebooting the PCs, "nbtstat
> > > > -R"
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps!
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > > Jim Bond
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:19 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: tough VPN question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> > > > office) and router (central office). All PCs at
> > > > branch
> > > > office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> > > > fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map
> > > > drives
> > >

Re: Still doesn't work: tough VPN question

2000-12-08 Thread Benjamin Walling

Pinging does not verify name resolution for WINS.  Ping will resolve a name
using DNS.  MS uses WINS (NetBIOS naming) for Domain Logins and for mapping
drives, etc.

Try this link on Cisco's website for help with coordinating your NT domain
with your network layout:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/winnt_dg.htm

It covers WINS and things like that.

Ben

"Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> Thank you guys for the help. Unfortunately, I tried to
> put LMHOST file, still doesn't work. We use WINS and I
> can ping domain controller using name so I don't think
> it's naming issue.
>
> I used a sniffer captured some data, client is sending
> logon request to domain controller but didn't get any
> response. Looks like PIX blocks it. How do I open
> it(port 137, 138, 139)?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Jim
>
> --- Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your problem is likely the propgation of
> > broadcasts...  Or lack thereof.
> > One thing you can do (I'm assuming you have a router
> > before (LAN-side) the
> > PIX) is set up an ip-helper address to forward
> > UDP-level broadcasts (like
> > 138/139 Netbios) to the NT server.
> >
> > The other thing you can do is bypass that broadcast
> > thought process by using
> > LMHosts files on the workstations at the branch
> > office.  That will pre-load
> > (if you use the #PRE designation) the NetBIOS cache
> > and give you IP
> > addresses to go to.  So if you have IP reachability,
> > things will work just
> > fine then.
> >
> > In LMHOSTS. :
> >
> > (ip address) (Netbios name) #PRE #DOM:(domain name
> > if domain controller)
> >
> > Also, to refresh without rebooting the PCs, "nbtstat
> > -R"
> >
> > Hope this helps!
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Jim Bond
> > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:19 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: tough VPN question
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up a IPSec between a PIX (branch
> > office) and router (central office). All PCs at
> > branch
> > office share 1 ip address. IPSec seems to be working
> > fine because clients can ping/telnet/email/map
> > drives
> > from/to central office. The problem is they can't
> > logon NT domain. They can ping domain controller
> > though.
> >
> > Any idea why they can't log on NT domain? (The
> > machines were already added to domain)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of
> > Products.
> > http://shopping.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> ___
> > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message
> > to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
> > unsubscribe ccielab
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Password Recovery for Catalys 1900?

2000-12-08 Thread Benjamin Walling

Follow the link on this page:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/index.shtml

You don't have to use the utility to do it.

""Ngo Van Dzung"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
001c01c060f7$05d0c310$0b65a8c0@ngodzung2000">news:001c01c060f7$05d0c310$0b65a8c0@ngodzung2000...
> Hi All,
> I have one Catalys 1900 with Firmware 1.09, but I forgot the password. The
> Cisco Documetation said that I need Password Recovery Utility software to
> recovery Password. I logon to CCO and follow the link in document, but I
can
> not download Password Recovery Utility.
> Where Can I download Password Recovery Utility? or how to do Password
> Recovery for Catalys 1900? Please, help me!
>
> Cheeres,
>
>
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Hub-to-Switch connection problem

2000-12-07 Thread Benjamin Walling

I've never had the little button/switch work on a 3Com.  I've always had to
use a crossover.

"Herold Heiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Happened to me before, connecting old 10mbit noname hubs to 3com
> officeconnect ones. the switch on the 3coms did not work with those,
> only a crosscable did work. Never discovered why, although obviously
> those old hubs were blamed :)
>
> Heiko



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Password recovery, 2610

2000-12-06 Thread Benjamin Walling

I think this page should cover your password recovery needs, now and in the
future:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/index.shtml


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Internal CSU/DSU Frame-relay simulation

2000-12-05 Thread Benjamin Walling

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/75.html

is a link to making a t1 crossover cable and a 56k crossover cable.


""Wilson, Christian"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is it possible to set up a simulated frame-relay connection between a
cisco
> 3640 and a 2611 in a back to back lab configuration?  Both these routers
> have internal csu/dsu 's.  I have hooked up two 1602R's with internal 56k
> switched csu/dsu 's  back to back to simulate frame.  To do this I used a
> cat 5 cable and switched pins 1/7 and 2/8.  Can I use this cable on the
3640
> / 2611 csu/dsu's as well?  Any help would be greatly appreciated!
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration

2000-12-04 Thread Benjamin Walling

You know, Cisco's ConfigMaker handles the 26xx series as well as the WIC
cards.  It will guide you through a wizard and then make the config for you.
You can use this to see how to do things that you don't know.

-Original Message-
From: lawrence sculark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2610 csu/dsu configuration


now what about the configuration of ipx on the serial interfacesany 
suggestions.i am unable to configure ipx on the serials...

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Ip management

2000-11-28 Thread Benjamin Walling



I used 
to do some consulting for Lucent's QIP product.  DNS/DHCP run out of a 
database witha nice GUI.  Are you an ISP?  I think they are targeting 
ver 5.1 at ISPs, with some provisioning tools.

  -Original Message-From: Palis Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 
  12:06 AMTo: Group Study; CISCOSubject: Ip 
  management
  I am looking for an good IP management program 
  able to manage several class C and privade addresses allocated to several 
  customers.
   
  Can you suggest one?
  ../  
  Ppalis Micheal  ../  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  ../ CYPRUS TELECOM. AUTHORITY FAX: + 357 2 
  486634../ Value Added Services www: http://www.cytanet.com.cy./ 
  Telecommunications Str../ P.O.Box 24929, CY-1396../ Nicosia, Cyprus 
  
   
   


RE: Is this true?

2000-06-14 Thread Benjamin Walling



Who paid the $100?  What a waste of money.  Next time, email me and I will send
you my address.  You can send a check directly to me.

Ben







John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/14/2000 02:11:09 PM

Please respond to John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  
  
  
  To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
  
  cc:  (bcc: Benjamin Walling/HQ/INDECON) 
  
  
  
  Subject  RE: Is this true?  
  :   
  









The real question on our minds is WHY???  Asking a CCIE to take the CCNA
exam is like asking someone with a PhD in math to retake college algebra.

>  Yes its true.  The gent in question is very bright and the story is a
real
>  one.  Truth is often stranger than fiction!
>
>  > -Original Message-
>  > From: Dollard Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 10:59 AM
>  > To: 'William E Gragido'; BIKEMAN; Victor Ibijola
>  > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Subject: RE: Is this true?
>  >
>  >
>  > why would any1 try to prod a CCIE into taking a simplistic test
>  > such as the
>  > CCNA? by god you know when u've acomplished the CCIE u know your
fricking
>  > OSI model good enough.
>  > Morgan
>  >
>  > > -Message d'origine-
>  > > De: William E Gragido [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  > > Date:   mercredi 14 juin 2000 17:02
>  > > À: BIKEMAN; Victor Ibijola
>  > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > Objet:  RE: Is this true?
>  > >
>  > > I work with a fellow engineer who did just that, he took his written
and
>  > > then his Lab.  He did not bother to take the CCNA test until after we
>  > > lovingly prodded him to do so.
>  > >
>  > > > -Original Message-
>  > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
>  > > > BIKEMAN
>  > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 2:23 AM
>  > > > To: Victor Ibijola
>  > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > > Subject: Re: Is this true?
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > Hi Victor
>  > > >
>  > > > It is true. BUT, it is not simply a financial issue (although
pursuing
>  > > the
>  > > > CCIE is very expensive). The CCIE is a vast magnitude harder than
>  > > > the CCNA.
>  > > > And thats just the written ;-).
>  > > >
>  > > > If you feel confident in your ability to chart the unknown by
>  > all means
>  > > go
>  > > > for the CCIE. There is very little usefull information out there
>  > > > compared to
>  > > > the other certifications - pretty much KNOW IT ALL. I am
>  > > > currently studying
>  > > > for my lab and my mood goes from: I'm going to do this to: What
>  > > > the hell do
>  > > > I think I'm doing.
>  > > >
>  > > > Read though the groupstudy archives, have a look what people
>  > who passed
>  > > it
>  > > > have to say about their experience and preparation and decide if
>  > > > you are up
>  > > > to the task. Whatever path you choose: GOOD LUCK.
>  > > >
>  > > > Rudi
>  > > > - Original Message -
>  > > > From: "Victor Ibijola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 6:58 PM
>  > > > Subject: Is this true?
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > > A friend told me that it is possible for me to skip CCNP and
>  > > > jump straight
>  > > > > to CCIE provided one can financially afford itIs this
>  > true? .
>  > > I
>  > > > need
>  > > > > more information on the way forward.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > I am currently a CCNA.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > I'll appreciate your immediate reply from you good guys.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > Than

Re: bandwidth estimation!

2000-06-14 Thread Benjamin Walling



This seemed to not make it to the list, so I'll try again.
-- Forwarded by Benjamin Walling/HQ/INDECON on 06/14/2000
08:11 AM ---


Benjamin Walling
06/13/2000 09:01 PM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:  Re: bandwidth estimation!  (Document link not converted)

Well, assuming 56k dialup (you said free ISP, I'm guessing it's not free DSL), I
would figure it like this:

Assume a 6:1 ratio on bandwidth (I know several ISPs that feel this is the safe
ratio to go by).  1000 users times 56k= 56Mbit.  Divide that by 6 and you get
about 9Mbit (6 T1s).  However, you don't expect to have all 1000 users online at
the same time, do you (I didn't gather whether you would have 1000 customers or
1000 modems)?  So, you don't need all of this bandwidth.  Figure that maybe 25%
of your users are online at any time (you would need a 250 modem setup for
this), and your bandwidth is 14Mbit, divided by 6 and you get 2.3Mbit.  A couple
of T1s should cover you in this case.

The 6:1 comes from the fact that web surfing is very bursty by nature (client
sends request, server send pages, client reads for a while, repeat).  Email is
probably factored in there, but I'm pretty sure the ratio is 6:1 inclusive of
email.

Hope that helps you some.

Ben


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OSPF configuration - Please help

2000-06-06 Thread Benjamin Walling



Are you able to ping the other router?  Do you see it with 'sh cdp nei'?  Also,
you should do 'shut' then 'no shut'.  The other way around shuts down the
interfaces (the way you said below).  Also, on Router B, I see no indication of
an area statement.  IE:  network 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0.  There is a network
statement under router ospf, but I am not familiar enough to know the effects of
putting 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 in that statement.  My understanding is that you must
give it an area (although if you don't, it may default to area 0).

Ben







"Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/06/2000 12:14:15 PM

Please respond to "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





  
  
  
 To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      
 cc:  (bcc: Benjamin Walling/HQ/INDECON)  
  
  
  
 Subject: OSPF configuration - Please help
  








Hello:

I have two 2503 and I am following Hutnik's to configure OSPF.
I connected RouterA, s0 (DCE) to RouterB, s0(DTE).

When I enter #show ip ospf int I see the following:
...
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DOWN
  Hello due in...
...


The State should be "POINT_TO_POINT".
The routers don't see each other. (#show ip route doesn't display OSPF
entry).
I entered "no shut" and "shut" in both routers s0 interfaces but it didn't
work. Any idea of what is wrong ?


Configurarion is below.


THanks,









RouterA


!
hostname RouterA
!
int Loopback0
ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0


int Loopback1
ip add 11.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
int S0
ip add 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no fair-queue
router ospf 64
network 192.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
no ip classless
!
...


RouterB


!
hostname RouterB
!
int loopack0
ip add 152.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
int Loopback1
ip add 153.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
int serial0
ip add 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
no fair-queue
clockrate 50
!
int s1
no ip add
shutdown
!
router ospf 64
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
!
no ip classless
!
...



___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BSCN objectives

2000-06-05 Thread Benjamin Walling



There is a BSCN course here in Tampa in July.  If there is space, I'll sit in
and see what it is.

Ben







"Ryan LaTorre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/05/2000 09:49:23 PM





  
  
  
 To:  Benjamin Walling/HQ/INDECON@Indecon, "Groupstudy"   
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
  
 cc:  
  
  
  
 Subject: Re: BSCN objectives 
  









Those objectives at the Global Knowledge web site are straight from the ACRC
course. Although I have not taken the Routing 2.0 exam, I recall the
consensus on Groupstudy was that the test did not resemble the current ACRC
very much at all.

Long story short, I wouldn't trust that outline until Global Knowledge is
ready to start teaching the BSCN - October, last I heard!


----- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Walling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: bscn objectives


>
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/cust/classes/C-TRN-BSCN.html
>
> Lists a brief overview of the subject matter.
>
> http://db.globalknowledge.com/catalog/outline.asp?course=515a&cat=6
>
> Lists an outline of the BSCN course as offered by Global Knowledge.
>
> That should give a basic overview of what to know.  I would prefer to have
some
> solid objectives before burning $100.  If anyone takes the test, can you
please
> lend your thoughts to the accuracy of these two pages.
>
> Ben





___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Fw: bscn objectives

2000-06-05 Thread Benjamin Walling



http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/cust/classes/C-TRN-BSCN.html

Lists a brief overview of the subject matter.

http://db.globalknowledge.com/catalog/outline.asp?course=515a&cat=6

Lists an outline of the BSCN course as offered by Global Knowledge.

That should give a basic overview of what to know.  I would prefer to have some
solid objectives before burning $100.  If anyone takes the test, can you please
lend your thoughts to the accuracy of these two pages.

Ben







[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/04/2000 09:22:24 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





  
  
  
 To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 cc:  (bcc: Benjamin Walling/HQ/INDECON)  
  
  
  
 Subject: Fw: bscn objectives 
  










Fair enough I guessbut how do you know what topics to study?

"keith wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<8hdjgs$37p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I have heard that Cisco are no longer publishing exam objectives.  This
> certainly appears to be the case as no objectives are listed for any of the
> new exams.
>
> I suppose it encourages you to learn it all...
>
> "Sawyer, Derrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Does anyone know where I can find the routing 2.0 objectives?
> > I checked on cisco's site and was only able to find the acrc objs.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ___
> > -Derrick S.-
> > MCSE+I, CCNA, CCDA
> >
> > ___
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ---
>
>
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

__
The information contained in this email communication may be confidential. You
should only read, disclose, re-transmit, copy, distribute, act in reliance on or
commercialise the information if you are authorised to do so. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email communication, please notify us immediately by
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or reply by email direct to the sender
and then destroy any electronic or paper copy of this message.  Any views
expressed in this email communication are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of a member of the
National Australia Bank Group of companies.  The National Australia Bank Group
of companies does not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this
communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of errors,
virus or interference.


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: value of cisco cert

2000-05-31 Thread Benjamin Walling



This would be entirely feasible, as Novell does something like that.  I would
like to see problems that requires multiple commands and starts the test taker
in exec mode.  That way, they show they can get around, and show they
understand.  The one line answers do not lend themselves to prove anything
except syntax has been learned.  Routersim seems to work well, and probably
could be licensed and modified to serve as in a test environment.  This would
add some lab-like feel to the tests and not cause Cisco considerable cost to
administer.

Novell currently has simulations in their exams.  They will open up
administration utilities and ask you to perform a task, generally about 4 steps.
However, they let you click around for as long as it took you to figure out what
to do (there is a time limit on the exam itself, so you could hurt yourself
doing this).







"TyRhon144000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/31/2000 11:39:23 AM

Please respond to "TyRhon144000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





  
  
  
 To:  "William E Gragido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  
 cc:  [EMAIL PROTECTED](bcc: Benjamin  
  Walling/HQ/INDECON) 
  
  
  
 Subject: Re: value of cisco cert 
  








I agree that a lab for each and every exam would be extreme, but what about
a configuration simulation?
I think that the test can include an objective that focuses on real world
scenarios. For example, the CIT exam, can have a troubleshooting problem
that you have to really have to troubleshoot, and the procedure can be
evaluated; the same way a the procedure is evaluated on some engineering
exams.
Something as simple as that can really enhance the value of Cisco
certifications.
I would like to see the value of Cisco certifications increase.
T. Knox
- Original Message -
From: "William E Gragido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: value of cisco cert


> Think about the time $$$ that would be necessary for total preparation if
> that were the case.  For example, servers are easy enough to build when
> budgeted for accordingly however a Catalyst switch or a Fore System ATM
core
> switch is another ball game altogether.  I think that a lab for every exam
> would be an example of ergonomic retardation.  Just my 2 cents folks. :-)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Justin Marcus
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 5:10 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: value of cisco cert
> >
> >
> > i think every exam... thats involved with routers/switches/hardware
should
> > have a lab exam as well as a writen one.
> >
> > :)
> >
> > ___
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCNA 1.0 vs. 2.0

2000-05-27 Thread Benjamin Walling



I sat the new course, ICND, and took the old test.  There were things like VLANs
and switching in the course that were not on the 1.0 test or in the 1.0 prep
material.  I think that Cisco has the requirements for each up on the web site.

Ben


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE:command

2000-05-26 Thread Benjamin Walling



I would use show hardware.  Show version just shows the name of the image.  I
could name it anything I want and load it into flash.  Most of the time, it will
be named for the Router or Switch series and the feature set, but this may or
may not be reliable.

Ben


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Frame Relay Problem

2000-05-17 Thread Benjamin Walling

This post may show my ignorance, but I'll try.  When I set up frame relay in
my lab, I used three routers.  One was configured as a frame relay switch.
I connected the other two to it and set up a frame relay connection between
them.  I was unaware that two adjacent routers could run frame relay to each
other.

Ben

-Original Message-
From: Nathan Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 8:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay Problem




I've set up a frame relay switch at home trying to complete one of the
"CCIE Lab all in one" Labs. For my question, what could cause a PVC to be
inactive? Things I've checked.

Serial is up line protocol is up on both sides.
LMI type is the same
Clocking is set on DCE side.
Encapsulation is Frame relay

What else is there to check? All suggestions appreciated.
 - att1.htm

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CID course

2000-05-16 Thread Benjamin Walling

http://www.rohlin.com/helpdesk/ccda.htm

BTW, the archives are searchable from the groupstudy web page.

Ben

-Original Message-
From: Omer Ehsan Dar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 1:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CID course




Hi everyone,
A long time back in a galaxy far far away someone posted a link to a
online course for preparing for CID. if someone has it please let me
know.
Thankx.
Omer Ehsan Dar



___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: sniffer

2000-05-13 Thread Benjamin Walling

If you have linux installed, you can run Ethereal.  It is very functional.
It can do ethernet, token, fddi, x.25 and ppp (I think it has some ATM
capabilities as well).

http://ethereal.zing.org

As a bonus, it reads Sniffer, NetXray, MS NetMon, LanAnalyzer, and several
other capture files.

Ben

-Original Message-
From: Scott Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sniffer




These guys are great also and quite a bit cheaper:

The product is called "Etherpeek"

http://www.aggroup.com


> http://www.nai.com/asp_set/buy_try/try/products_evals.asp
>
> ""Balharek, Peter"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> tcpdump (unix, linux...)
>> windump (windows)
>>
>> p.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lance Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 12:07 PM
>> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> Subject: sniffer
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone suggest decent sniffer software that I might be able to
> download
>> as trial ware or shareware? Thanks a lot, Lance
>>
>> ___
>> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ---
>
>
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Scott Nelson - Network Engineer
Wash DC +1202-270-8968
Los Angeles +1310-367-6646
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bnmnetworks.net
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=scottnelson@bnmnetwork
s.net
--
|   |
Scott Nelson   :|: :|:
BNM Networks  :|||:   :|||:
  ..:|||::|:..
--

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]