ISP related question
All, A simple question for those who have related exprience/knowledge: If we want to switch to another ISP, how soon we need to finish our readdressing? I understand as our current address is assigned by our current ISP, we need to give back this address and migrate to a new range coming from our new ISP, we definitely want to how sufficient time for this process, just want to know how long most of the ISP allows for this kind mirgration. We have a /16 address currently. Thanks JP _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISP related question
I made a mistake in the original email, we own the /16, but there are a bounch of /24 which we got from our ISP. We are not globally routing the /16, so this makes the story different. We just need to replace those /24s from the new ISP, probably get something continious. I guess the big concern is DNS, we will need the change the active time to about 10mins and wait till it spreads out before the actual cut-over, so that our down time will be minimized. JP ""Brian"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 98osnr$5cb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:98osnr$5cb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If you really have a /16 out of public space, I would suspect that would be > yours to keep. I would encourage investigation of this. That is a whole > lot of space. > > Brian > > "JP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 98muap$qvu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:98muap$qvu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > All, > > > > A simple question for those who have related exprience/knowledge: > > If we want to switch to another ISP, how soon we need to finish our > > readdressing? > > I understand as our current address is assigned by our current ISP, we > need > > to give back this address and migrate to a new range coming from our new > > ISP, we definitely want to how sufficient time for this process, just want > > to know how long most of the ISP allows for this kind mirgration. We have > a > > /16 address currently. > > > > Thanks > > > > JP > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISP related question
I know, but that will take a multination company many years to do that. Yes, we do not have DHCP. JP -- ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:p05001927b6d5f6ddd97d@[63.216.127.100]... > >I made a mistake in the original email, we own the /16, but there are a > >bounch of /24 which we got from our ISP. We are not globally routing the > >/16, so this makes the story different. We just need to replace those /24s > >from the new ISP, probably get something continious. I guess the big concern > >is DNS, we will need the change the active time to about 10mins and wait > >till it spreads out before the actual cut-over, so that our down time will > >be minimized. > > > > > >JP > > It would sound like a much more rational approach is to renumber your > internal hosts into private address space, and advertise the /16, not > using ISP space at all. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to pronounce NANOG? [7:97]
Sorry for the out of topic question, but how you folks in the states pronounce NANOG? is it nei'nog, 'neinog or 'naenaug? Thanks JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=97&t=97 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dark Fiber question [7:769]
All, A question about normal practice of renting dark fiber. We have two sites about 60 miles apart, each site has a cisco GSR. We are going to connect them together with OC-48 PoS interface cards(haven't bought cards yet). My question is, should I ask for a pair of dark fiber from the carrier or just ask for an OC48 sonet connection between these two sites? I guess the dark fiber gives us less impact by the carrier's network, but we would not be able to use any APS, as no ADM from the carrier will be involved. Unless, we want to buy our own ADM, which is not likely to happen at all. This is the first time we run into this kind of setup, we need some experience/suggestion before going any further. Thanks JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=769&t=769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A question abouut Ratools [7:807]
Folks, I am trying to use Prtraceroute, but got the error: bash# ./prtraceroute ftp.ripe.net ttlProbe: Could not set ipaddr for 0x452d98ce Am I missing something here? Thanks for any help. JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=807&t=807 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dark Fiber question [7:769]
Scott, Thanks for the information. > #2) One advantage of leasing dark fiber is your company could implement a > DWDM solution and pay as you grow. You could add an OC-48 as you see fit by > simply adding lambdas (OC-48 wavelengths). This is exactly what we are considering right now. I think we need to bargin with the teleco based the estimation of our bandwidth. We can always get the dark fiber when requirement comes, it just a matter of how soon and how much. > David and Andyh both brought up good arguements for leasing from a carrier. > 50ms APS on carrier OC-48 Ring. Definitely, unless we could get two pairs, which is not practical for an end user. Based on you guys great inputs, I think we probably will intend to rule out the the dark fiber solution, it is kind of like rent a backbone from the carrier, if the carrier heavily oversuscribes the backbone(through ATM etc.), they are unlikely give the end users a very cost-effective price. > Just my 2 cents... > > > Scott Thanks again. This list rocks. JP > > > ""JP"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > All, > > > > A question about normal practice of renting dark fiber. > > We have two sites about 60 miles apart, each site has a cisco GSR. We are > > going to connect them together with OC-48 PoS interface cards(haven't > bought > > cards yet). > > My question is, should I ask for a pair of dark fiber from the carrier or > > just ask for an OC48 sonet connection between these two sites? > > I guess the dark fiber gives us less impact by the carrier's network, but > we > > would not be able to use any APS, as no ADM from the carrier will be > > involved. Unless, we want to buy our own ADM, which is not likely to > happen > > at all. > > > > This is the first time we run into this kind of setup, we need some > > experience/suggestion before going any further. > > > > > > Thanks > > JP > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=953&t=769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DC Spring Cisco Picnic Saturday [7:1001]
This is really cool, but I guess if there is one in NYC it definitely should not be on this coming Saturday unless it is in Yankee Stadium, Red Sox in town! Bruce or anyone has been in the picnic last year, could you guys let us know how things like in the past, one day is not a whole lot of time of doing something, when you finish hooking everything up, it is lunch time, after lunch time.., sunset already... :) got to be a great chance to know nice folks from the list. Do other regions have the similar events? Thanks Kent ""Zolt"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Cool! > > Does anyone plan similar picnic in NYC area? I would be interested. > > Zolt > > ""Bruce Evry"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hello, > > > > This is to invite you to attend our Cisco-DC get-together coming > > up this Saturday, April 21, 2001. This is our Spring Picnic, aka Router > > Roast. (but no, we don't roast routers, we just use them as warming > > trays, really, they work great) > > > > Saturday, April 21, 2001 > > Time: 10 am to 4 pm, lunch around noon > > Place: Bruce Evry's House (aka The Hilltop Estate) > > > > This time we are planning on doing all the exciting hands-on lab > > stuff in the early morning and then have some talks on various topics in > > the afternoon. > > > > There is no charge or fee. If you'd like to bring snacks or sodas > > or desserts to share, that is always appreciated! > > > > You can also bring routers, switches, and laptops, of course. > > Just make sure that all things you bring are carefully marked! > > > > DIRECTIONS TO THE HOUSE > > > > 1607 Thomas Road, > >Fort Washington, MD 20744 > > > > From Maryland take I-95 to exit 3a in MD, > > From Virginia take Exit 2 in MD > > > >To the Indian Head Highway South. > > > > Go about 3 miles, turn Left on Old Fort Road. > > > > Go exactly 2 miles on Old Fort Road, > >Turn Right on Thomas Road. > > We are 1607 Thomas Rd, > > almost all the way down the street on the left. > > > > Look for bright orange pumpkin & a long gravel driveway > > With no House visible from street! > > > > If lost, our phone # is 301-292-5231, call us! > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1026&t=1001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Books for WAN Switching? [7:4072]
Hi, Could any of you folks suggest some good books on cisco wan switching (BPX, GX)? Thanks JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4072&t=4072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP community string question [7:6340]
All, When matching community string in BGP routes, it seems to be different than matching as-path, I have seen expression(new format in cisco) like 701: * to match any strings starting with 701, in as-path term, it should be written like " 701: .*" I saw the 701:* from juniper manual, did not find anything similar on CCO So if there is a "701:*[3-4]2" expression, what does it match? I guess 701:32, 701:42 are obvious, anything else does it match? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6340&t=6340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP community string question [7:6499]
All, When matching community string in BGP routes, it seems to be different than matching as-path, I have seen expression(new format in cisco) like 701: * to match any strings starting with 701, in as-path term, it should be written like " 701: .*" I saw the 701:* from juniper manual, did not find anything similar on CCO So if there is a "701:*[3-4]2" expression, what does it match? I guess 701:32, 701:42 are obvious, anything else does it match? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6499&t=6499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP community string question [7:6503]
All, When matching community string in BGP routes, it seems to be different than matching as-path, I have seen expression(new format in cisco) like 701: * to match any strings starting with 701, in as-path term, it should be written like " 701: .*" I saw the 701:* from juniper manual, did not find anything similar on CCO So if there is a "701:*[3-4]2" expression, what does it match? I guess 701:32, 701:42 are obvious, anything else does it match? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6503&t=6503 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird BGP question [7:10384]
Richcard, I guess it could not be anything but that. But seems to me this has little to do with BGP. JP ""Richard Chang"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is indeed an interesting question although I never heard that it is > being done... > > If I were to take a guess, it would be to manipulate traffic so that > upstreams A would always be preferred. (append extra AS paths and a default > route should do the trick). Then there has to be some kind of network > management tools to send out alerts when the accumulated traffic for > upstream A reaches 300G. At that point, you can tell the router to take B as > preferred while put A as backup. > > Your upstream provider might have a traffic monitoring web page that you can > log into to view the same results. > > Any better ideas? > > Richard > > ""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)"" wrote in > message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Here's a weird BGP question I got today. Take a standard > > dual-homed site using BGP to connect to two upstreams. Is it possible > > to get BGP to route the first 300G of traffic per month to upstream A > > and the rest to upstream B? I'm told it's done all the time, but > > somehow I doubt it. > > > > Before the famous question gets asked, the problem being solved is > > cost. The idea is to not exceed the minimum cost of upstream A. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10426&t=10384 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routers as tftp servers [7:27912]
Nicolas, It is a lot saver and easy to manage if you just use a PC, I do not see why you would want to use your router as tftp server. JP ""Nicolas FEVRIER"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > "TFTP does not provide any security for file transfers, so it should not be > > available to a public firewall interface. Unauthorized users can upload new > > config files to your router, as well as download your current stored > configs > > for analysis." > > > > How can you configure the router to accept TFTP file uploads? > > I use : > tftp-server flash:c3640-is-mz.121-5.T9.bin > in my "source" router to allow other routers to copy the ios image from > this > one. > > Check this out : > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/copyimage.html > > Nicolas. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27918&t=27912 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP PfxRcd [7:29331]
All, I have three BGP routers learning full table from different ISPs, they are fully meshed IBGP peers. If I do a "show ip bgp summary" on one of the routers: Neighbor V ASMsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.200.255.22 4 1 3239033 1044612 604463300 1d02h 50645 10.100.255.22 4 1 730890 957516 604463300 20:18:35 59854 157.x.x.x 4 701 44859226 735704 604463100 5w0d 103907 The other two routers have similar output. All three routers are learning about 103-104K routes from EBGP sessions, I thought all prefixes learned from ebgp should be forwarded to all IBGP peers but seems to me they only forward about 50% of these prefixes to their IBGP peers. What am I missing here? Thanks JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29331&t=29331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP PfxRcd [7:29331]
Chris, We have ospf and no synch configured. JP ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > JP, > > Do you have an IGP running? Or do you have synch turned off? > > Chris > > -Original Message- > From: JP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 5:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: BGP PfxRcd [7:29331] > > > All, > > I have three BGP routers learning full table from different ISPs, they are > fully > meshed IBGP peers. > If I do a "show ip bgp summary" on one of the routers: > > Neighbor V ASMsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down > State/PfxRcd > 10.200.255.22 4 1 3239033 1044612 604463300 1d02h > 50645 > 10.100.255.22 4 1 730890 957516 604463300 20:18:35 > 59854 > 157.x.x.x 4 701 44859226 735704 604463100 5w0d > 103907 > > The other two routers have similar output. > > All three routers are learning about 103-104K routes from EBGP sessions, I > thought all prefixes learned from ebgp should be forwarded to all IBGP peers > but seems to me they only forward about 50% of these prefixes to their IBGP > peers. > > What am I missing here? > > Thanks > JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29354&t=29331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP PfxRcd [7:29331]
No filters among IBGPs and using next-hop self. JP ""Wojtek Zlobicki"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Using any prefix lists of filters ? > Filtering out networks of a particular size ? > Specifying next-hop self ? > > ""JP"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > All, > > > > I have three BGP routers learning full table from different ISPs, they are > > fully > > meshed IBGP peers. > > If I do a "show ip bgp summary" on one of the routers: > > > > Neighbor V ASMsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ > Up/Down > > State/PfxRcd > > 10.200.255.22 4 1 3239033 1044612 604463300 1d02h > > 50645 > > 10.100.255.22 4 1 730890 957516 604463300 > 20:18:35 > > 59854 > > 157.x.x.x 4 701 44859226 735704 604463100 5w0d > > 103907 > > > > The other two routers have similar output. > > > > All three routers are learning about 103-104K routes from EBGP sessions, I > > thought all prefixes learned from ebgp should be forwarded to all IBGP > peers > > but seems to me they only forward about 50% of these prefixes to their > IBGP > > peers. > > > > What am I missing here? > > > > Thanks > > JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29363&t=29331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Natting problem...help!!! [7:66111]
I have the following scenario 0---0--telnet application network3network 1 network 2 lan wan link I need all hosts on network 3 to telnet to my "telnet application" Problem is network 3 and network 2 both have the same ip range. My question is the following: Is there any way i can perform natting to allow network 3 hosts to telnet to the application and use an ip address other than the one assigned to the application as the destination address??? Any ideas appreciated Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66111&t=66111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT IP in DNS reply payload? [7:66224]
Hi Thanks for the help.It actually turned out to be quite a simple config in the end and i had no dns servers for name resolution.I actually had to configure the natting on Enterasys equipment so i wanted to test it first on the cisco stuff But thanks for the feedback Julian ""Charles Hammonds"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > from "Natting problem" thread... > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_examp le09186a0080093f30.shtml > > > "...The inside device cannot use the IP address of the outside device > because it is the same as the address assigned to itself (the inside > device). Therefore, the inside device will send a DNS query for the outside > device's domain name. The inside device's IP address will be the source of > this query, and that address will be translated to an address from the > "test-loop" pool because the ip nat inside source list command is > configured. > > The DNS server replies to the address which came from the pool "test-loop" > with the IP address associated with the outside device's domain name in the > payload of the packet. The destination address of the reply packet is > translated back to the inside device's address, and the address in the > payload of the reply packet is then translated to an address from the pool > "test-dns" because of the ip nat outside source list command. Therefore the > inside device learns that the IP address for the outside device is one of > the addresses from the "test-dns" pool, and it will use this address when > communicating with the outside device. The router running NAT takes care of > the translations at this point..." > > > Is that accurate??? The "ip nat outside source" command will translate the > IP in the PAYLOAD of the DNS reply packet even though it is not the > source??? doesn't sound right and I am unable to test it rite now... > > Charles Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66231&t=66224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Some free scenarios and tutorials (slight correction) [7:43066]
Peter, - Original Message - From: "Peter Rosenthal" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:11 AM Subject: Re: Some free scenarios and tutorials (slight correction) [7:42985] > > Besides, who wants to read CCIE prep material from a guy that hasn't even > passed the lab! Howard does us all a favor and please go take the lab. > You're so awesome with all your books and work on the IETF so it should be a > breeze. No excuses! I disagree with you on this comment. There are coaches and players. In order to pass the lab you will have to know the stuff and be able to type it in time, some people may just do feel comfortable under some pressure, I am not saying this is the case for anyone for sure, but to me, not being a CCIE just means not having that number, period. You do not have to be a world champion to coach your team to win it. I am not saying who claims to be a coach is certainly capable of being a good one, but we just cannot logically rule that out. IMHO, the owner of the list owns the list. The owner has the freedom to give some kind of privileges to anybody. That said, I think no matter how much free stuff is in there, it is an underestimation of people's intelligence claming that this kind of posting is non-business related. People open mails everyday know this for sure. Just my .02 Kent Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43066&t=43066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISP Topology Design [7:43836]
""dre"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> You also might want to check out Barry Greene / Philip Smith's > new CiscoPress book, "Cisco ISP Essentials" and the website, > http://www.ispbook.com/ I heard the book is partially based on the papers from this link: http://www.cisco.com/public/cons/isp/essentials/ HTHs Kent Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43918&t=43836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7206 boot-image [7:25866]
Duncan, I did my research before posting the question. I just could not find anywhere on CCO says if the boot image has to match the main IOS, thanks for your confirmation about that. To me , if I use any old boot-image, it may not recognize some of the new cards, but as long as it brings up the fast ethernet, I can always load a newer IOS later. Thanks JP ""Maccubbin, Duncan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 7200 boot images are a tricky thing. I'm not sure of your wording below but > the boot image is for the router to boot off of. After the router boots of > off the boot image then it loads the main IOS image. The big thing I look > for is if the boot image supports all the cards that are in the router. That > way if the main image fails I know all the cards will work. Make sure you > get an image taht fits in the boot directory (4mb) as Cisco desided to make > several images that won't fit in there when they expand. You can still use > those images but you will have to put them in the main flash area and use a > boot system command. No, you don't have to have the boot image and main > image being the same version. I'm sure if you search Cisco's website under > "7200 boot image" you will find all the info you need. > > Duncan > > -Original Message- > From: JP > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11/11/01 9:12 PM > Subject: 7206 boot-image [7:25866] > > All, > > I know the boot-image of 7206's onboard flash memory is a backup in case > the > primary IOS on flash cards fails. It only includes software to configure > basic IP information. If this is right, I think I can just upgrade the > IOS > on the flash card, as the boot-image should basically be same. > I noticed that there is a boot-image for each IOS, I assume we do not > make > them match each other, is this right? > > Thanks > JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25974&t=25866 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
642-801 Routing [7:74015]
Anybody who recently Pass this exame ? How much IPv6 in questions ? joupin.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74015&t=74015 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Multi VLAN Port
Dear All, What is the different of Multi VLAN Port and Overlapping VLAN? And what does a Switch type to support Multi VLAN Port? Thx _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: 2600 router - 12.0 IOS wanted
Not only CCO Login, you should be a Cisco Silver Partner. cmiiw Cisco Systems will bankrupt if all people whose have CCO login can download IOS ;-) Cheers, Budi > - Original Message - > From: "McCallum, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Ravi Kumar'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 5:58 PM > Subject: RE: 2600 router - 12.0 IOS wanted > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/Iosplanner/Planner-tool/iosplanner.cgi > > ?majorRel=12.1 > > > > > > > > watch the word wrap. You will also require cco login for this. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ravi Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 23 February 2001 10:38 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: 2600 router - 12.0 IOS wanted > > > > > > hi friends > > > > can u pls let me know few links, from where i can down load ios 12.0 form > > 2600 > > series router. > > > > tanx in advance. > > > > bye > > ravee > > > > > > > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco IP support Certification [7:47309]
Can anyone recommend which books to prepare for the three tests to complete the certification? jp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47309&t=47309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
