RE: 2questions [7:51850]
SoonKyoung, ip host is similar to name-to-ip mapping. The name will be only locally significant. for example, if you configure ip host lala 192.168.0.1 You could ping, telnet, and etc to 192.168.0.1 using the name 'lala' here is real life example but since I did not have 192.168.0.1 in this network, ping times out and the telnet times out. But you can see that it resolves the 'lala' to 192.168.0.1 -- r1#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. r1(config)#ip host lala 192.168.0.1 r1(config)#exit r1#ping lala %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.0.1, timeout is 2 seconds: . Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) r1#telnet lala Trying lala (192.168.0.1)... % Destination unreachable; gateway or host down r1# - for service upgrade all, I found the link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/17.html you could find out more about it. I have not dealt with 12000 series so I have not used it before. Looks like this command is only available in 12000 series. I did not see it available on 2500, 3600 routers nor 3550 switches. Hope this helps. Edward -Original Message- From: soonkyoung kwon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wed 8/21/2002 1:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: 2questions [7:51850] please let me know below command's means 1.router(config)#ip host abc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 2.router(config)#service upgrade all thank you soonkyoung kwon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] i=51850t=51850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51853t=51850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX SSH problem [7:43215]
You have to regenerate your rsa keys after changing your host name or domain You also have to remove the saved key out of your ssh client for that device -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX SSH problem [7:43215] Hi all, maybe some PIX guru can shed some light here. While I was uploading the pix621.bin software to a lab PIX, after a reload, I found out that the new software does not like an underscore(_) in the hostname. I changed the hostname LAB_PIX to LAB-PIX. This then complained about the rsa key pair used for SSH access. No problem here. I removed the key pair and regenerated it, saved, all ok. I used no ca save all and ca zeroize rsa. Key pair was successfully regenerated and saved. Problem now is that I can not SSH from here in any more. I get a message that says: Decrypting packet: received/computed checksum error from my secureCRT client. I can still get into the PIX via the internal router and then telnet to the internal cards IP address. So this is SSH only that is a problem. Any ideas here Thanks in advance * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43229t=43215 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Louis Rossi's Token ring white paper [7:42885]
I think it is here but you need login I believe. http://www.ccprep.com/resources/news/archives/Token_Ring2.pdf -Original Message- From: Richard Botham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Louis Rossi's Token ring white paper [7:42885] Hi All, I've lost my copy of Louis Rossi's Token ring white paper/How to read a RIF. Does anyone know where I can get this Cheers Richard * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42891t=42885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE RS Beta [7:41793]
What happens if you already passed the written and just want to see how the test is like? If you fail, do you lose your credit from the prior exam? If you pass, does it extend the life of the written exam credit? Ed -Original Message- From: Debbie Westall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE RS Beta [7:41793] What's happens if you already have the written scheduled (350-001)? Do you take the beta or the regular written? Thanks Debbie Westall --- Kris Keen wrote: I dont like the idea of having to learn MPLS and all the other stuff, im just going to accelrate my study for the current written [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41840t=41793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: netbios over internet [7:40784]
I don't think it can. As far as I know, it can do IP/IPX/DecNet/AppleTalk/Vines/CLNS. NetBios over TCP/IP will work with GRE but not straight NetBios or SNA. If GRE works with NetBios or SNA, it will be cool. I think that is why we use DLSW with NetBios and SNA connection. Ed -Original Message- From: Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: netbios over internet [7:40784] Is it possible to send nonroutable traffic through a GRE Tunnel? On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 10:12, Engelhard M. Labiro wrote: How about NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NBT) and encapsulate it with IPSec. Another idea is using a GRE tunnel to pass the NetBIOS to the next hop. I don't think you can, besides bridging on every internet hop. On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 23:14, cage wrote: how can I make the netbios over Internet except the dlsw+ ? * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40823t=40784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: netbios over internet [7:40784]
I agree. -Original Message- From: Michael Bray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: netbios over internet [7:40784] You certainly can do file sharing over the internet - saying 'NetBIOS' is routable is a bit misleading though... It's the underlying protocol that determines its ability to be routed... -mike bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: netbios over internet [7:40784] NetBEUI is non-routable. NetBIOS is routable. NetBIOS over TCP/IP should supposedly work over the Internet. For example, can't you do file sharing over the Internet? That uses NetBIOS and SMB of CIFS. (I'm a Mac person, but in theory it should work. ;-) Priscilla * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40842t=40784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
I got the BGP working on 1600s. They work fine (in lab environment of course.) Ed -Original Message- From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] Dave, This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! Ken MADMAN 01/10/02 10:24AM I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, 1700, 2600... Dave [snip] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31563t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529]
I think I used IOS 12.1(9) with IP/IPX/FW PLUS (I think). I know exactly what you mean since after the IOS upgrade, it worked in our lab environment as well. It is definitely your IOS issue. Try to upgrade to IP PLUS or if your memory and flash supports it, use the all feature one. Let me know how it works out. Ed -Original Message- From: Shawn Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] Hi, Kim: Your email gives me a deep impression. 1605 router is one I am attempting to use for BGP,but when I tried router bgp asnumber,it says unknown routing protocol. If I tried router rip or router ospf number, they are ok. By the way, IOS ver 12. Please help, thanks. Shawn From: Kim Edward B Reply-To: Kim Edward B To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:01:51 -0500 I got the BGP working on 1600s. They work fine (in lab environment of course.) Ed -Original Message- From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hardware BGP? [7:31529] Dave, This was good for a chuckle. The second sentence is a riot!! Ken MADMAN 01/10/02 10:24AM I don't think 1600's support BGP. Actually BGP is supported in most all IOS of platforms that support BGP. If you just want to configure BGP for experience and not accept 100k+ routes I now you can use a 2500, 1700, 2600... Dave [snip] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31585t=31529 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-How to find port on switch if you have MAC [7:28429]
Sh cam (and mac address in AA-BB-CC-DD-EE-FF) format Or Sh cam dynamic Will give you the whole list. Ed (NP, DP) -Original Message- From: Don Oxman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT-How to find port on switch if you have MAC [7:28429] Sorry for the off-topic post, but... If I have the MAC address of a device and I want to know which port on a Cat 5505 it's plugged into, how I can I find that out? I assume it's a command on the switch, but what is it? Thanks, --Don _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28433t=28429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: which is the best [7:23902]
If it is cisco only environment, I would prefer EIGRP. Less CPU and Memory requirement (which means less expensive routers in some cases and also more free CPU and Memory for the routers). Also I believe they have better convergence time than OSPF. As Mr. Lupi mentioned, while OSPF's metric is based on bandwidth, the EIGRP can be based on (bandwidth, delay and also MTU, load, reliability as necessary). For example, if you have F/R of 512K and 256K, OSPF will use the 512K. You could make it to use the 256K to load balance by the bandwidth statement but it won't be really true load balancing. EIGRP can via variance and other ways. Con is the proprietary Routing protocol. In the future if you acquire non cisco network, you could still use the redistribution. So if you have only cisco network, I would prefer EIGRP. Lastly, OSPF's more hierarchical design than EIGRP(OSPF areas, stubby, total and not so stubby, etc) can scale better in bigger network, but for the given router numbers (50), EIGRP fits better in my opinion. I don't know what I'm trying to say here... For the given condition, I would go with EIGRP, but if you are planning to expand and also possibly acquire non-cisco routers OSPF might be better. Sorry for the confusion. My .02 cents. Ed -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: which is the best [7:23902] I prefer OSPF, only because if you decide to put a device that is not a Cisco on the network you don't have to run 2 routing protocols. Your decision would have to be based on your needs also, EIGRP has a couple of features that OSPF does not that you may want, such as load balancing across links that do not have equal metrics. Guy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: which is the best [7:23902] In a medium (50 routers) cisco only environment which routing protocol would be prefered ... EIGRP or OSPF ? What are the pros and cons ? Thanks Dave * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23949t=23902 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
copying file from partition 2 to partition 1 in same flash [7:23407]
Is it possible? When I tried, it said, 'can not copy files to same device'. ( I tried to copy the same file to same flash and different partition number) Please let me know. Ed * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23407t=23407 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debug Timer set? [7:21883]
Dear Cisco grus, Is there such a debug command that sets time for the debugging so in case I do such thing as 'debug all' it finishes the debug by itself after certain time? I searched the Cisco site and also am going through the 12.0 Debug Command Reference but can't seem to find it. Let me know. Ed CCNP, CCDP, CCIE Written * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21883t=21883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732]
I passed Written last Wednesday and I was able to register this Monday. Perhaps you should check with Cisco. I got a confirm e-mail from this e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Hope it helps. Ed -Original Message- From: George Aslanishvili [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732] I believe Cisco is switching their 2 day lab test to one day starting October 1st. Maybe that's why your confirmation is delayed. Good Luck Cheers -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732] Hi,How long does it take for one to schedule the Lab after having passed the Written? I passed it more than 2 weeks back and till today I have not received any email from Prometric or Cisco regarding scheduling the lab. I was told 3 days!!Any ideas?Thank you. Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21182t=20732 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help! Locked out of my 7513 Router! [7:16769]
-If you think the config change made the mess, try to boot with slot 4 removed. -Also, are you using the right break key for your hyperterminal? (here is the link for the break key sequence. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/61.html ) *** I thought the correct stop bit was 1 instead of 2. 9600 baud rate No parity 8 data bits 1 stop bit ( you said yours is set at 2) No flow control -If your keyboard is not working at all, your register might have been changed. Can you telnet in or use your AUX port? Let me know if these helps. Ed CCNP, CCDP -Original Message- From: Richard Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help! Locked out of my 7513 Router! [7:16769] Dear Cisco Groupstudy Person: I locked myself out of my Cisco 7513 router somehow.My Keyboard has no effect. I'm not sure if this is the reason, but my most recent configuration change was to fill the No. 4 slot, previously blank, with a Fast Ethernet Card. Everytime I power cycle the router, it comes up again, goes through the boot sequence, and then freezes with a string of messages concerning the status of FE 3/0 and FE 4/0, first stating that they are up and then stating they are down. Even the password recovery technique where one uses the Break or ^[ Keys and then resets the Config Register can't be used. For some reason, the keyboard won't even work; it has no effect in this situation suddenly!!. I have carefully checked my Hyperterminal settings of 9600 baud ; Data bits=8 Parity=none stop bits=2 Flowcontrol=none Anybody have any idea why my keyboard is dead I am working with Vlan configurations on this Router. Please help! Thank you. * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16772t=16769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
Boson #1, 2, 3 were really good. Sometimes the questions are much harder than the real test. Also make sure you study for the explanation part of the answer. They cost like 29.99 each but they worth every penny. Edward CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: Michael Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951] Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests. Where I can get the best? Regards Zahid Hassan wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I wouldn't rate it good. Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover the materials in the exam. All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially Caslow's BRS for CCIE. Good luck. Zahid xie rootstock wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. Regards * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14002t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone studying for CCIE in Pittsburgh Area? [7:12374]
Let me know. Edward * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12374t=12374 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to form a study group (for CCIE) in Pittsburgh, PA area. [7:12351]
Let me know if anyone is interested. Thanx. Edward Edward Bo-Hyun Kim CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+ Assistant NOC Manager NOC (NETWORK OPERATIONS CENTER) CSD MELLON BANK N.A V (412)-485-3405 (in NOC) V (412)-236-2465 (in DEG) P (888)-470-2911 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are no secrets to success, It is the result of preparation, hard work, and learning from failure. -General Collin Powell- * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12351t=12351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP on BSCN? [7:8810]
My experience was different. I would say 50% of the BSCN test was about BGP and OSPF when I took it. I took it around January of this year. Just sharing my experience. Sincerely, Edward CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: William E. Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP on BSCN? [7:8810] I would say that less than 7% was devoted to BGP when I took it. Halabi's book is excellent and if memory serves me correctly our own Mr.Howard Berkowitz was going to be writing a new BGP book, Howard is that still in the works? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JC Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP on BSCN? [7:8810] I tell you what, there was not that much BGP on the exam. Get to know it well if you plan to work for an ISP, or just get to know it because its what the internet is running, but for the exam don't kill yourself on it, just understand the basics, its not covered that much in the exam. Like any test it dabbles a little in every category listed on the exam outline on Cisco's page, it may seem dumb but if you follow their outlines you'll do well on the test. Don't get bogged down in detail you'll just be wasting your time. JC lootch wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I was wondering what percentage of the BSCN exam is devoted to BGP? I have been using Cisco Press's BSCN book (Paquet), Cisco's Internet Routing Architectures by Bassam Halabi (specifically for BGP) as well as extensive lab time, hopefully this is enough to pass.. Will take the exam July 15th * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8857t=8810 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP on BSCN? [7:8810]
If you read the Halabi's book, then you should be good. Halabi is like god of BGP. I like his book a lot. Second Edition. Edward -Original Message- From: lootch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 10:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP on BSCN? [7:8810] I have had different responses from two different newsgroups regarding the quantity of BGP questions on the exam. so I guess its different for everyone. With that I will finish up with Halabi's book (which is a good read!) and move on to OSPF Network Design Solutions by Thomas Thomas which I have already read once but will read through one more time as a refresher. Thanks to all! Alohas Jason Kim Edward B wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... My experience was different. I would say 50% of the BSCN test was about BGP and OSPF when I took it. I took it around January of this year. Just sharing my experience. Sincerely, Edward CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: William E. Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP on BSCN? [7:8810] I would say that less than 7% was devoted to BGP when I took it. Halabi's book is excellent and if memory serves me correctly our own Mr.Howard Berkowitz was going to be writing a new BGP book, Howard is that still in the works? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JC Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP on BSCN? [7:8810] I tell you what, there was not that much BGP on the exam. Get to know it well if you plan to work for an ISP, or just get to know it because its what the internet is running, but for the exam don't kill yourself on it, just understand the basics, its not covered that much in the exam. Like any test it dabbles a little in every category listed on the exam outline on Cisco's page, it may seem dumb but if you follow their outlines you'll do well on the test. Don't get bogged down in detail you'll just be wasting your time. JC lootch wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I was wondering what percentage of the BSCN exam is devoted to BGP? I have been using Cisco Press's BSCN book (Paquet), Cisco's Internet Routing Architectures by Bassam Halabi (specifically for BGP) as well as extensive lab time, hopefully this is enough to pass.. Will take the exam July 15th * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8872t=8810 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]
I agree on the 'not natively implemented in the most common o/s' part' but doesn't IRDP use Multicast instead of Broadcast? I know that IRDP uses the all-systems multicast address (224.0.0.1) which is sort of a broadcast in a multicast group but I think it still uses multicast for the communication. Let me know. Edward -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425] Broadcast intensive and not natively implemented in the most common o/s would be my guess. -Original Message- From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425] I've read several times that IRDP allows hosts to discover gateway routers. But every time I read that it's followed by the statement that it's seldom used. Does anybody know why? It seems like it would come in handy for failover purposes. Chris * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8437t=8425 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:8061]
have you used bandwidth 64 statement? Also in bandwidth statment, it is in kilobits instead of bits. Let me know how it works. Edward -Original Message- From: Neil Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: URGENT ! [7:8061] Are you using the correct crossover cables? Neil Ravi Varma wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Guys We have 10 3640 Routers at our place the probelm i am facing is that i have to connec all these ten routers back to back each router have 2 FE and one T1 (dsu/csu) When i tried to connect then back to back through the serial line using show int Serial 0/0 down and line protocol DOWn i had assigned Ip address assigned the clock rate 64000 no shut and default encapsultaion (hdlc) and other i had gone through the same procedure but not assigned the clock rate can u please help me on that it i have to get it up by evening Thanking you guys in advance Regards, Ravi Varma * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8066t=8061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161]
I think Router will look up in his SAP table and if he knows any server, he will forward the GNS to the server he knows. Edward -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chuck Ryan) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JZ) wrote in : Q2 if a routers gets a GNS request what will it do a ignore it b pass to next sever on segment c pass to nearest server To me, the best one would be (a). because the router will do one of the two things when it gets GNS -- ignore it, or reply to it. It will never pass the GNS to anyone else. James There should be an answer (D) none of the above. The router will not pass a GNS to anyone else, instead, it will send a reply with information about the nearest server. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3259t=3161 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161]
Thank you Chuck. Edward -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chuck Ryan) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161] Here's the answer from the ICRC coursebook: If a Netware server is located on the segment, it will respond to the client request. The Cisco router will not respond to the GNS request. If there are no NetWare servers on the local network, the Cisco router can be configured to forward the GNS SAP to an appropriate remote NetWare server. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim Edward B) wrote in : I think Router will look up in his SAP table and if he knows any server, he will forward the GNS to the server he knows. Edward -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chuck Ryan) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written ...really dumb Q`s [7:3161] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JZ) wrote in : Q2 if a routers gets a GNS request what will it do a ignore it b pass to next sever on segment c pass to nearest server To me, the best one would be (a). because the router will do one of the two things when it gets GNS -- ignore it, or reply to it. It will never pass the GNS to anyone else. James There should be an answer (D) none of the above. The router will not pass a GNS to anyone else, instead, it will send a reply with information about the nearest server. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3265t=3161 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805]
haha -Original Message- From: Chris Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] He's trying to be all technical I wonder if he's ever used this pick-up line i'm going to route your packets, baby - Original Message - From: Donald B Johnson jr To: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:27 AM Subject: Re: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] huh - Original Message - From: Kim Edward B To: Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:33 PM Subject: RE: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] Why are you guys broadcasting your message to whole subnet (groupstudy) while you can use UNICAST or MULTICAST to specific host? Please take personal stuffs offline and stop using Broadcast. You are wasting our resources and everyone of us has to process it like broadcast) Oh, this is going to be a broadcast message too. Sorry everyone. Thanx. Edward -Original Message- From: Grad Alfons Kanon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] Hello Jim, I hope that you still keep your promise to send me the CVOICE material as the trade-off for MCNS that I have sent U. I have sent you the soft copy few months ago, but I STILL DIDN'T RECEIVE yours. regards Grad _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1872t=1805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How long ? [7:1928]
It had 100 questions and 755 to pass. It was not as hard as I thought but it was LONG. Good luck. Edward CCNP,CCDP -Original Message- From: Antonio Ramirez Volker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How long ? [7:1928] Two very simple question.. How long takes the CID exam? What is the pass grade? Thanks in advance Antonio *** Ing. Antonio Ramirez Volker Consultor LAN/WAN Consorcio Red Uno S.A. de C.V. Av Lazaro Cardenas 3430 piso 2 Col Chpalaita CP 45040 Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico Tel 3 678 58 00 Fax 3 678 58 88 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1961t=1928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805]
Why are you guys broadcasting your message to whole subnet (groupstudy) while you can use UNICAST or MULTICAST to specific host? Please take personal stuffs offline and stop using Broadcast. You are wasting our resources and everyone of us has to process it ( like broadcast) Oh, this is going to be a broadcast message too. Sorry everyone. Thanx. Edward -Original Message- From: Grad Alfons Kanon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LAST REMINDER FOR JIM KONIECKI [7:1805] Hello Jim, I hope that you still keep your promise to send me the CVOICE material as the trade-off for MCNS that I have sent U. I have sent you the soft copy few months ago, but I STILL DIDN'T RECEIVE yours. regards Grad _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1809t=1805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failed BSCN [7:1405]
I agree. Great BGP book. Even though it is like 4 years old, I haven't seen a better BGP book yet. Definately recommended. Edward -Original Message- From: Fenech, William J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Failed BSCN [7:1405] Internet Routing Architectures Author: Halabi ISBN: 1-57870-233-X Good Luck Bill Fenech LAN/WAN Developer Lockheed Martin Mission Systems email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brad Shifflett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Failed BSCN [7:1405] Failed by 23 points. Really tough on BGP. I only got 22%. Any tips on good materials to really grasp BGP? Brad Shifflett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Micromenders, Inc. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1421t=1405 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Catalyst 6509 MSFC problem [7:949]
first do SWX(enable)sh flash to see the correct file name then do SWX(enable)delete filename Let me know if you need other help. Thanx. Edward CCNP,CCDP,MCP,CNA,A+,Network+ -Original Message- From: Kim Seng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Upgrade Catalyst 6509 MSFC problem [7:949] How do I erase the current flash. The erase flash cmd does not work on the Catalyst 6500. Do I need to switch to ROMMON to erase the current IOS and upgrade the new IOS from there? Kim. --- VOIP 2000 wrote: Kim, You have to delete the old IOS and make sure you have enough Flash available. EM --- I am trying to upgrade my Catalyst 6509 MFSC to version 12.1.5. When I issued the cmd: copy tftp flash at the router prompt. It failed and told me that there are not enough space to upgrade the new image. Can someone help me with this. I am digging cisco web site for reading right now. Sorry this is my first time with this. Kim. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=989t=949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP!!!: Can Ping but no traceroute [7:514]
Guys, I can ping the server from the RSM that is on the same switch that is connected to the server but I can not traceroute it. PHYSICAL CONNECTION SRV - SWX - RSM LOGICAL CONNECTION SRV - RSM I can ping and traceroute to the server from the SWITCH I can ping from the RSM but CAN NOT Traceroute from the RSM Anyone know the answer? Please help Edward * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=514t=514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Check this one out ..... [7:537]
Gee, thanx. -Original Message- From: Keyur Lavingia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 7:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Check this one out . [7:537] Heard about IP on atm , fiber ethernet, token ring and bla bla. What about IP on water Pipes... I m not kidding. Check out this site.. http://www.dutchwater.com/ KEYUR FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=544t=537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: two 8 megs of flash on a 2501 [7:439]
you want to Router#erase flash first to delete the files in on of those partitions (partition 2 in this case). Then, Partition the flash with Router(config)#partition flash 1 16 where 1 is the partition number and 16 is the size (in MB) of the partition. Let me know if you have other questions regarding this problem. -Original Message- From: Frank Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: two 8 megs of flash on a 2501 [7:439] Hi folks, Is it possible to combine two flash partition into one so I can put a bigger ios image in the router? Currently it shows as: Routersh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-D-L), Version 12.0(12), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 11-Jul-00 08:19 by htseng Image text-base: 0x030388DC, data-base: 0x1000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 10.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Router uptime is 1 hour, 11 minutes System restarted by power-on System image file is "flash:c2500-d-l.120-12.bin" cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision F) with 16384K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 04849258, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash partition 1 (Read ONLY) 8192K bytes of processor board System flash partition 2 (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 Thanks for any help. -Frank FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=442t=439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271]
I heard evenif you don't answer any, you will still get 300. Also minimum passing score changes as the mean of the score. So if there are more people who passed with high score, they the passing score will raise. If lots of people fail with low score, the passing score will be adjusted to lower score. So as far as I know, there isn't a fixed passing score but it is usually around 700 something. Ed -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Zero, if you miss all the questions or don't answer any of them :- Ok. Sorry. Couldn't resist. Passing score is 70 Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Bambic Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Just curious. Thanks for the reply. Mike Bambic [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=280t=271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271]
Okay guys, I got the message. But, If anyone of you have a EXAM CRAM by Coriolis for R/S CCIE Written book, At the beginning of the book around the page xxii~xxiv in Introduction part, xxiv (Introduction) 3rd line "Cisco no longer publishes a set passing score for the written examination. Instead, Cisco will supply you with a pass or fail grade. The actual passing score (a percentage) is based on a statistical analysis system that checks the scores of all candidates over three months and then adjusts the score needed to pass accordingly. For example, the passing score for one candidate maybe 70 percent, but it may be 75 percent for another candidate, depending on what results candidates are attaining. After completing a short survey prior to the examination, you will be notified of the score you need to gain a passing grade. For more information, see www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/exam_preparation/written.html#6." Well, of course, I couldn't find same information from the website address, but this is what the book said. I could be wrong, but letting you know what I know from the reading. Sincerely yours, Edward CCNP, CCDP -Original Message- From: Belt, Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Actually, the score passing score doesn't adjust at all. You must have a score of 70 out of 100 points to pass the written. Louie CCIE #7054 -Original Message----- From: Kim Edward B To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4/11/01 5:46 PM Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] I heard evenif you don't answer any, you will still get 300. Also minimum passing score changes as the mean of the score. So if there are more people who passed with high score, they the passing score will raise. If lots of people fail with low score, the passing score will be adjusted to lower score. So as far as I know, there isn't a fixed passing score but it is usually around 700 something. Ed -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Zero, if you miss all the questions or don't answer any of them :- Ok. Sorry. Couldn't resist. Passing score is 70 Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Bambic Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Just curious. Thanks for the reply. Mike Bambic [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=295t=271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271]
Oh, I passed the test 2 weeks ago. Just wanted to update you guys with the fresh information. Ed -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:06 PM To: Kim Edward B Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Stop sweating the score and just prepare, tis a better way to use your resources. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Kim Edward B wrote: Okay guys, I got the message. But, If anyone of you have a EXAM CRAM by Coriolis for R/S CCIE Written book, At the beginning of the book around the page xxii~xxiv in Introduction part, xxiv (Introduction) 3rd line "Cisco no longer publishes a set passing score for the written examination. Instead, Cisco will supply you with a pass or fail grade. The actual passing score (a percentage) is based on a statistical analysis system that checks the scores of all candidates over three months and then adjusts the score needed to pass accordingly. For example, the passing score for one candidate maybe 70 percent, but it may be 75 percent for another candidate, depending on what results candidates are attaining. After completing a short survey prior to the examination, you will be notified of the score you need to gain a passing grade. For more information, see www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/exam_preparation/written.html#6." Well, of course, I couldn't find same information from the website address, but this is what the book said. I could be wrong, but letting you know what I know from the reading. Sincerely yours, Edward CCNP, CCDP -Original Message- From: Belt, Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Actually, the score passing score doesn't adjust at all. You must have a score of 70 out of 100 points to pass the written. Louie CCIE #7054 -Original Message----- From: Kim Edward B To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4/11/01 5:46 PM Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] I heard evenif you don't answer any, you will still get 300. Also minimum passing score changes as the mean of the score. So if there are more people who passed with high score, they the passing score will raise. If lots of people fail with low score, the passing score will be adjusted to lower score. So as far as I know, there isn't a fixed passing score but it is usually around 700 something. Ed -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Zero, if you miss all the questions or don't answer any of them :- Ok. Sorry. Couldn't resist. Passing score is 70 Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Bambic Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271] Just curious. Thanks for the reply. Mike Bambic [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
RE: a strange question!
It would be nice to have ifconfig from Solaris ipconfig /all from W2K sh ip route and possibly sh run from your router NEI (not enough information) of your question is wasting so many e-mails messages, bandwidth, cpu, time, etc. of lots of people More information would help to escalate your problem much faster. Thanx. Ed CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: Zhiping Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: a strange question! hi,everyone I encountered a strange question. I can ping and telnet my router from Windows2K, but I can't ping and telnet the router from solaris. Why? The IOS is "IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-JS-M), Version 12.0(4)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)" Waiting your help. __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please Help me with this lab --- Im stuck
I agree on this one. -Original Message- From: Arthur Simplina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 6:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please Help me with this lab --- Im stuck Additional comment: Add the "bandwidth 56" to s0/0 of R2 to be the same as R1. Arthur Router #2 R2#sh %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname R2 ! enable password ccna ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 172.16.25.1 255.255.0.0 ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.128.1.2 255.128.0.0 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! router ospf 200 network 10.128.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 ! ip classless ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing Exam
It is 690. I don't want to scare you but it is the hardest of the 4. I found that Switching 2.0 was the easiest. Good luck. -Original Message- From: Mike Bowlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:47 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Routing Exam Can anyone tell me the minimum passing grade for the Routing 640-503 exam? mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing score
699 It was the easiest of the four. Good luck. Edward -Original Message- From: Roan, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:28 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Passing score Group, What is the passing score for 640-504 BCMSN? Thanks, Wayne _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Agreement
First go to http://www.galton.com/~cisco/ then log in then left side "Cert Progress" Click on -Cisco Career Certifications You will see the agreement button there. -Original Message- From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 9:37 PM To: J Roysdon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco Agreement Oops, finished the CCNp last w/e and haven't yet confirmed the updated agreement. For those dolts among us (I count myself as Primo DOLT!) where do we go to confirm the agreement -- sans flames if you please. Thanks. Greg Macaulay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J Roysdon Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 12:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Agreement You'll need to do the latest agreement. You don't have to do it after each test, but if there is a new agreement since the last time, you'll have to. I think there have been two updates in the last year, so I've had to do it 3 times. -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ ""Circusnuts"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 008601c0a295$0317eba0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:008601c0a295$0317eba0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm half way through the CCNP test I wondering about the online = agreement... do I need to confirm the agreement after each exam ??? I = show that I accepted the agreement almost 2 years ago when I first took = the CCNA. Thanks Phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 1720, DSL and OSPF
One of the ways I did load balance before for one of my client was this. Set HSRP on both of the router. (so 2 sets of HSRP) Each one of them is Active HSRP router and Standby for the other. So, ie) Router A: 192.168.0.10 Virtual 192.168.0.11 Actual (Active) 192.168.0.20 Virtual 192.168.0.21 Actual (Standby) Router B: 192.168.0.10 Virtual 192.168.0.12 Actual (Standby) 192.168.0.20 Virtual 192.168.0.22 Actual (Active) Depending on your size of network and how it is subnetted, point half of your clients to one router and the other half to the second router. In this case, it is load-balancing (sort of, not really) and also falut-tolerance. There are other ways to do it as well, but if it is DSL and if it is small network (less than 50 ~ 100 nodes), I recommend this one. Thanx. Edward B. Kim CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, A+, MCSE, CNA -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco 1720, DSL and OSPF I have a customer who, at present, has 2 dsl line going out to 2 seperate ISP's through Alcatel Modems. What he would like is to be able to load balance with route-redundancy over both lines. I figure the 1720 with 2 adsl modules can take care of his router but I am not sure what routing protocol they need to implement so they get true equal-cost load balancing. Is OSPF the solution or can RIP do this? Any info truly appreciated. P. Again, routing protocols don't load balance. The route selection process decides on load balancing, as long as it has more than one eligible route to the destination. Such routes can even be static. With a few caveats, every IP routing protocol can produce multiple equal-cost routes (caveats include that OSPF will not generate parallel externals, and standard BGP doesn't have a concept of equal cost load balancing). Equal cost load balancing has its greatest applicability in an enterprise, or with multiple links to the same ISP. Unless your customer has a thorough understanding of global routing, he is likely to get a rude awakening if, for example, he sets up both external links as defaults, each to a different ISP. I would suspect that 30-40% of the queries he sends out one path will return on the other path. You can get a certain amount of load sharing, not load balancing, with BGP, but complex issues remain. With BGP _and_ appropriate agreements with both carriers, you can get a fair amount of load sharing of enterprise-to-ISP traffic. It is far more difficult to get load sharing in the other direction. My gut tells me that this customer is too small to achieve any useful degree of multi-ISP load sharing, and indeed multihoming. You haven't even touched the addressing and DNS issues involved. A much more reasonable approach might be to contract for single-provider multihoming (i.e., links to two different POPs). From my own experience, however, the DSL facility itself is likely to be the source of the greatest number of problems. It's unlikely that the two DSL links will have any level of diversity. Let's put it this way -- I am considering attempting to get some level of multihoming for improved availability out of my home office, and I have a thorough knowledge of exterior routing. My more modest approach would be to back up the DSL connections with multiple PPP dialups, accepting the speed loss. If I can get cable connectivity, that would help for some applications, but still has nasty addressing problems. An alternative might be to get a frame relay over T1 connection to the provider, and back it up with SDSL. I'm far too small an installation to get globally routable address space, but I can cobble up something to give diversity for specific applications (e.g., extranet VPN access). _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
