Re: Halabi's Internet Routing Architecture 1st/2d eds- Differences?
I just finished reading 1st edition. A couple of weeks ago, glossed through the 2nd edition in the bookstore and noticed no major differences except the diagrams were more up to date in terms of the internet backbone bandwidth allocations and NAP placements Cheers, Lance >From: "Greg Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Greg Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Halabi's Internet Routing Architecture 1st/2d eds- Differences? >Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:36:06 -0500 > >Hi all, > >Anyone have any knowledge/opinions as to the substantive differences >between >Halabi's 1st and 2d editions to his BGP book (Internet Routing >Architecture)?? I have the 1st edition and really don't want to waste >money -- if the two volumes are fundamentally the same. Any and all >opinions welcomed -- including flamers -- if you need to!! > >Greg Macaulay >AARP (lifetime member) >certs not listed >other professional qualifications also not listed > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco share in downfall
Sure, My Manager told me to stop work on all new network projects, and implement the following solution for full-mesh, Point-to-Point network connectivity. Campbell soup can-String-Campbell soup can Pow! instant solution!!!...and what a savings! Cheers, Lance >From: "ahmadbilal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "ahmadbilal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Cisco share in downfall >Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:32:02 +0500 > >Dear all, > >i would like to know your comments and suggestions,as we all know IT is in >shaky ground these days the hype surrounding it is fizzling out.We the >network engineers are facing more and more competion and the openings once >prjected seem far,what should we do ?should we continue our quest should we >keep at networking or shift towards system(unix,sun,etc) or should we wait >. >the situation maynot be that gloomy as ive projected but we need a serious >rethinking to survive ,any suggestions. > >Regards, > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco share in downfall
While a network administrator may be tempted to go with the larger capacity cans, be aware that a costly echo cancellation implementation may be required. Cheers, Lance >From: "The.Rock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "The.Rock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco share in downfall >Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:54:08 -0600 > >Is that a turnkey or Turkey solution?? > >By the way, are the cans your talking about the little 10oz ones or of the >3LB variety??? > >""Raul F. Fernandez-IGLOU"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >012101c0ae4a$11a6a240$f1402ca6@WG647J50805">news:012101c0ae4a$11a6a240$f1402ca6@WG647J50805... > > Yes, I see the end is near.I wonder if this would work: > > > > Mac-Mac---Mac--Mac > > > > Look folks, so what if CISCO is going down and Juniper is better in some > > respectslearn something from Microsoft. > > > > Its hard to kill somthing that is so entrenched in the industry or for >that > > matter is the industry. > > > > Anywayone day CISCO will just buy Juniper and if you are good you >will > > always have a job. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Mask Of Zorro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 1:07 PM > > Subject: Re: Cisco share in downfall > > > > > > > > > > Campbell's soup cans are a proprietary solution. I prefer a more open > > > solution, like the soup cans from Progresso. Besides, Progresso offers >a > > > turnkey soup solution, no need to turn to add water or anything > > > > > > [=`) > > > > > > Z > > > > > > >From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: Re: Cisco share in downfall > > > >Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:30:22 -0800 > > > > > > > >Sure, > > > > > > > >My Manager told me to stop work on all new network projects, and > > implement > > > >the following solution for full-mesh, Point-to-Point network > > > >connectivity. > > > > > > > >Campbell soup can-String-Campbell soup can > > > > > > > >Pow! instant solution!!!...and what a savings! > > > > > > > >Cheers, > > > > > > > >Lance > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "ahmadbilal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Reply-To: "ahmadbilal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Subject: Cisco share in downfall > > > > >Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:32:02 +0500 > > > > > > > > > >Dear all, > > > > > > > > > >i would like to know your comments and suggestions,as we all know >IT >is > > > >in > > > > >shaky ground these days the hype surrounding it is fizzling out.We >the > > > > >network engineers are facing more and more competion and the >openings > > > >once > > > > >prjected seem far,what should we do ?should we continue our quest > > should > > > >we > > > > >keep at networking or shift towards system(unix,sun,etc) or should >we > > > >wait > > > > >. > > > > >the situation maynot be that gloomy as ive projected but we need a > > > >serious > > > > >rethinking to survive ,any suggestions. > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_ > > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >_ > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > > >_ > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any take on Caslow's new BRS book?
Group, Saw a thread back in October speculating on the new BRS offering from Caslow, published November 2000. Any reviews or opinions on the 2nd edition??? Cheers, and happy holidays Lance _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what's the mean of lo0,qfe0 and hme0?
I've seen qfe0 on Sun boxes, it refers to Quad Fast Ethernet. They offer qfe nics for the diehard servers (4-interface nics). lo0 refers to the loopback address of a device. I forget the hme0, but Robert's gaf made me hungryso make that a HME1-supersized! cheers, Lance >From: Drew Simonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Drew Simonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Robert Padjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: Mark Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: what's the mean of lo0,qfe0 and hme0? >Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:43:19 -0500 > >Robert Padjen wrote: > > > > And for the trivia buffs - hme stands for... > > > > Happy MEal!!! > > > > It was a time when the Sun engineers were quite into > > fast food! > > > >Hrm... and all this time I thought it stood for >Hundred Megabit Ethernet. Go figure. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: So what SHOULD a CCIE know?
Well let's start with the obvious. It's well documented that if a CCIE candidate has limited knot-tying hands-on experience to go along with his/her book knowledge, the probability of a "tripping mishap" is increased dramatically. Imagine the embarassment of the candidate, when he/she injurs themselves while entering the Lab examination roomall because of an untied shoelace which could have been easily avoided had the candidate spent more time with "hands-on" exercises. Lance >From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Cisco Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: So what SHOULD a CCIE know? >Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:39:43 -0800 > >We've all seen a number of comments about the CCIE written and the CCIE >Lab, >regarding content. Most of those comments have been negative. > >So, what SHOULD be tested? What SHOULD a CCIE know? > >Anyone? > >Chuck >-- >I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx_Brain_dumps_xX are futile. Your life >as >it has been is over ( if you hope to pass ) From this time forward, you >will >study US! >( apologies to the folks at Star Trek TNG ) > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T3 and Ds3
Although often used interchangably, and rightly so, technically DS-3 or Digital Signal-3 is different than T-3 or T-Carrier-3. A DS-3 channel is comprised of seven DS-2 channels, which is comprised of four DS-1s, which is 24 DS-0sso. DS-0 = 64K x24 = DS-1 = 1.536M (1.544M w/T-carrier overhead) x2 = DS-2 = 3.072M (3.152M w/T-carrier overhead) x7 = DS-3 = 43.008M (44.736M w/T-carrier overhead) There is also a DS-1C, which is two DS-1s, but this is rarely seen anymore. In fact, These values are dependant on the Mux hierarchy of telco's T-carrier Mux networks, the strict sense of this terminology being largely obsolete, depending on how new thier stuff is. Hense DS-3 and T-3 being used interchangably. Cheers, Lance >From: "nsamuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "nsamuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Cisco Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: T3 and Ds3 >Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:55:24 -0500 > >Is there a difference in a T3 and DS3, or is this just termilogy? > >Nigel > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T3 and Ds3
Although often used interchangably, and rightly so, technically DS-3 or Digital Signal-3 is different than T-3 or T-Carrier-3. A DS-3 channel is comprised of seven DS-2 channels, which is comprised of four DS-1s, which is 24 DS-0sso. DS-0 = 64K x24 = DS-1 = 1.536M (1.544M w/T-carrier overhead) x2 = DS-2 = 3.072M (3.152M w/T-carrier overhead) x7 = DS-3 = 43.008M (44.736M w/T-carrier overhead) There is also a DS-1C, which is two DS-1s, but this is rarely seen anymore. In fact, These values are dependant on the Mux hierarchy of telco's T-carrier Mux networks, the strict sense of this terminology being largely obsolete, depending on how new thier stuff is. Hense DS-3 and T-3 being used interchangably. Cheers, Lance >From: "nsamuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "nsamuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Cisco Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: T3 and Ds3 >Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:55:24 -0500 > >Is there a difference in a T3 and DS3, or is this just termilogy? > >Nigel > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappointed with ccnp!!
The Cert can only get you the interview, not the job. Your lack of experience is the real issue here. Try a body shop like Manpower, Frith Recruiting, or Comms people. Cheers, Lance >From: park jeongwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: park jeongwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Disappointed with ccnp!! >Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 19:42:18 -0800 (PST) > >Hi group members. >I need your help. >I am having a hard time on finding a job. >I recently got ccnp certification and looking for the >entry level of job for network engineer. >I am living in San Francisco, and graduated from >college less than a year ago. >I have less than a year of network experience that I >got from school computer lab. >I had a harder time finding a job before I became >ccnp. So I studied hard believing that ccnp would get >me somewhere at least as a entry level network >engineer. Now I am kind of confused and disappointed >with the fact that I am still having a hard time >finding a job even with ccnp certification. >I feel like I need more cisco certifications such as >ccda, ccdp. >Would these certification ever help me find job? >It is really discouraging that cisco certification >doesnt help me much find a job at this point, because >I am also pursuing ccie too. I have to ask myself what >is the point of getting cisco certification. >Lots of CCNAs are having a job. Why not ccnp? > >Could somebody tell me why it goes like this, and what >I should do? >Am I looking for wrong job? > >I will appreiciate your input. > >jeongwoo > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! >http://photos.yahoo.com/ > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco & muscles
Sure, I'm 6 foot 4, 230lbs. Since getting the CCNP, I can benchpress the entire cisco press library (250lbs)!!! ;^) Cheers, Lance >From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: cisco & muscles >Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:11:41 +0800 > >If we see on Ciscopress book cover, there are always man with big muscles & >strong. >I'm working on CCIE .. and muscles :-) Anyone here have CCIE plus big >muscles ? > > >Ibam >ccnp+voice2.0 > > >Disclaimer: >Please note that this correspondence is for the named person's use only and >may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you >received >this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system >and notify the sender. Please ensure that you do not disclose, copy or rely >on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended recipient. >We apologize for any inconvenience and thank you for your assistance. >Please >note that nothing in this correspondence shall be construed or otherwise >relied upon by the recipient as an offer, acceptance of an offer, >representation, agreement or resolution of any kind. > >Copyright(C)Davnet Singapore Pte. Ltd. 2000 > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need your opinion
I beg to differThere is no such thing as a paper CCIE, not with the hands-on lab to back up the written. The lab in and of itself separates the Book Smart from the Packet Jockeys. Cheers, Lance >From: Phil Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Phil Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Need your opinion >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:45:50 + (GMT) > >Have to agree with both posts here. The method that >you outline to achieve CCIE status i.e taking all the >courses etc, I think you would achieve CCIE status, >however, you would still be missing real world >experience. >This could be termed a 'paper' CCIE although you would >obviously be very valuable to the industry. > >I know that some Support Companies put their staff >through training for CCIE in as little as 6 months, >however, personally that badge is not for me. > >I think it comes down to the industries expectations >of CCIE status versus your own. > > >HTH, > >Regards, > >Phil. > >--- Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Being >at the point in my studies where pure terror > > is setting in, I would > > say that one very important component of preparation > > is the actual > > configuration and troubleshooting on real routers, > > configuring "real" > > scenarios. The books aren't helpful here. The > > thought process is very > > important. Seeing the results of operations via the > > show and debug commands, > > and understanding what those outputs are saying, is > > every bit as critical as > > understanding how to configure OSPF over a frame > > relay multipoint interface. > > Understanding the implications of your choices is > > every bit as important as > > getting a network to router packets so you can ping > > interfaces. > > > > I find the biggest problem I am facing is the > > changing of the mindset. In my > > job, I design networks for customers. It is > > straightforward and practical > > work. I would never create a design like some of > > the things I am seeing in > > the practice labs. This is the mindset that I think > > must be changed. Like a > > chess master, a CCIE must always be thinking 10 > > moves ahead. This kind of > > mindset comes only from extensive hands on. I agree > > that it is not > > necessarily OTJ that creates the mindset. I agree > > that extensive practice > > with scenarios from fatkid or ccbootcamp of Mentor > > Vlabs can provide that > > training. > > > > Check out www.chuck.to/CCIEAdvice.htm for good > > preparation advice from > > successful CCIE's , including that of the author > > below, whose advice I have > > always found worth considering. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Peter Van Oene > > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 6:45 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:Re: Need your opinion > > > > I have to slightly disagree. CCIE is a test, pure > > and simple. It actually > > doesn't relate much at all to real world experience. > > When would you rush > > like a maniac to build a superfluously complex > > network in 12 hours with only > > limited guidelines and then have it maliciously > > tampered with while you eat > > lunch only to come back and fix it in 4 hours? CCIE > > is all about knowing > > the intricacies of protocols and Cisco's > > implementation of them and being > > able to efficiently configure and troubleshoot them > > under immense pressure > > (mostly from not wanting to come back and do it > > again). > > > > What Henry is missing is pure hands on router time. > > You simply have to > > practise your configuration routine for the basics > > over and over until you > > do it in your sleep. (this is true actually, > > you'll know your ready when > > you dream about IOS and have nightmares about routes > > missing from your table > > when everything looks right in the config) Rack > > time at ccbootcamp or > > similar might fill in the blanks here. > > > > Pete > > > > > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > > > On 1/10/2001 at 11:53 AM Robert Nelson-Cox wrote: > > > > >>From: Henry D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Reply-To: Henry D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Subject: Need your opinion > > >>Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:28:47 -0800 (PST) > > >> > > >>Hi all, > > >> > > >>Need your opinion here. Currently I'm (quite > > paper) > > >>CCNP. I don't have home lab nor any OSPF and BGP > > real > > >>world experience. I have limited experience in > > frame > > >>relay, RIP, EIGRP. Now if I take all CCIE related > > >>courses (OSPF & BGP workshop, ECP1, CCIE > > preparation > > >>training from horizon-mts, Cvoice, CATM, etc, take > > one > > >>week CCIE prep lab), and spare 3 times lab exams, > > what > > >>do you think of my chance to become CCIE ? > > > > > >You'll probably fly the written part, then get shot > > down in flames during > > >the lab. > > > > > >The CCIE is about rea
Re: Boson vs. Colt ??????
Boson. >From: "Rah Sta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Rah Sta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Boson vs. Colt ?? >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:13:54 -0500 > >To All, > >Which practice exams are better for CCNP, Boson or Colt? Example: BCRAN >Opinions appreciated. Thanks > > > Raheem >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cable pinouts for KIV7 HS to 3640
Use EIA-530 pin-out on the 37 pin connector on the KIV. This sounds wierd but there you go. 2/14-TXD 3/16-RXD 15/12-TXCLK 17/9-RXCLK 31 and 33 are your TX and RX resyncs Check out the KIV user manual for more details. Cheers, Lance >From: "ML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "ML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cable pinouts for KIV7 HS to 3640 >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 21:04:29 -0700 > >I have seen this one, usually your customer can get those cable through the >KIV vendor or NSA. I have seen folks try to make the cable but usually >they >do not work, ask then to try to get their local Signal unit to build them, >they know how. > >ML > > >"Michael Vicchiollo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >001b01c079f8$3ed0de60$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:001b01c079f8$3ed0de60$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Howdy all, > > > > > > I have a customer who has a question about some cables for a system they > > are deploying using Cisco 3640s with NM-4Ts and KIV7 HS. He said the > > standard RS-449 doesn't work (the pin outs are different). Do you have >any > > ideas as to what the pinouts may be or where I can locate this info? >Any > > help would be appreciated, thanks. > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Sec. Beta results - What if...
Perhaps we would be the next cast of "Survivor"..Chuck! put your clothes back on!! Lance >Nigel Taylor wrote: > > > Chuck, > > Yes, the fact that I didn't pass does leave me completely >focused on the > > goal at hand(passing the lab). Somehow failure in one thing seems to > > provide better reason to succeed at something else. > > > > And then there's this questions that really get me thinking... > > > > - What would we all be doing right now if cisco didn't exist...? > > > > Nigel... > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco to 3Com Dot1Q trunks and VLANs
This brings to mind a question for the group: Will Cisco's 802.1Q implementation support per-VLAN STP? Cheers, Lance >From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco to 3Com Dot1Q trunks and VLANs >Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:41:55 - > >Michale, > >I have dot1q trunks running across Cisco MDF switches and Nortel IDF >switches. We found that Cisco and Nortel run two different versions of >Spanning Tree, both of which are 802.1q compliant. The difference between >the two is that Cisco's portfast feature, and Nortel's faststart feature >are >different, where portfast has a default forward delay of 15 seconds, and >faststart doesn't implement the forward delay feature. > >This resulted in a huge amount of TCN's (topology change notifications), >particularly in the morning, when all end users are booting up their pc's >and changing to 'forwarding' mode in spanning tree. As a result, we opened >a ticket with Nortel, and they agreed to add forward delay to their >switching code to correct this problem. > >I would check the STP documentation on both vendors, and determine if all >the default values are the same, what the default root bridge priority >number is with both vendors, who you have configured as your root bridge, >etc. I would even plug a sniffer in and capture some traffic... Draw out a >spanning tree diagram, and document your root bridge, and the subsequent >switches in the spanning tree. Those are just some suggestions... Hope you >find some results. > >Chris > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Cisco to 3Com Dot1Q trunks and VLANs > >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:02:56 -0600 > > > >I have the opportunity to create this cross platform network and am >looking > >for > >information other than the standard documentation from Cisco and 3Com to > >accomplish this task. The dot1Q trunks appear to be functioning >correctly > >between the Cisco 6509 and the 3Com 3300, but the VLANs are not >performing > >optimally. Any helpful information or pointers to sites with information > >would > >be greatly appreciated. > > > >Mike > > > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Puzzling HSRP issue....Comments?
Group, Ran across a puzzling HSRP behavior issue today... I have two 2514s running HSRP on Ethernet 0. When I induce a failure of Primary router's (Router A) E0 interface, I can use 'debug standby' to determine that HSRP failover takes place as expected, just after the holddown expires. The Standby router (Router B) waits three hello intervals, then changes it's MAC to the virtual HSRP MAC, becoming Active. This works like textbook, what I did not expect came when I restored Ethernet 0 on Router A (the one with a higher Standby priority), when this is done, Router A changes HSRP state from init to listen for one holddown interval, and begins sending hellos. It receives none from Router B, although Router B is sending them. Router A then changes state from listen to standby, continues to send hellos, then changes state to Active, also changing it's MAC to the HSRP virtual MAC. At this point, Router A continues sending hellos, recieving none, even though I can verify that Router B is sending them. Eventually, Router A recieves a hello from Router B, indicating a resignation. Good. Router A is now officially the active HSRP router and begins forwarding traffic, problem is this process takes 27-30 seconds, regardless of hellointerval/holddown timers (I tried this with the default of 3/10 and then with 1/3 and got the same 30 second delay in fail-back) Oh, by the way, all packets forwarded to the HSRP interface bound for their respective destinations get dropped during this 30second fail-back blackout.any thoughts? Cheers, Lance _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Puzzling HSRP issue....Comments?
I fingered it out..I forgot to turn off Spanning tree on the CAT5K switch that I have connecting the routersand that I neglected to mention below..oops. Cheers, Lance >From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Puzzling HSRP issueComments? >Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:49:16 -0800 > >Group, > >Ran across a puzzling HSRP behavior issue today... > >I have two 2514s running HSRP on Ethernet 0. When I induce a failure of >Primary router's (Router A) E0 interface, I can use 'debug standby' to >determine that HSRP failover takes place as expected, just after the >holddown expires. The Standby router (Router B) waits three hello >intervals, then changes it's MAC to the virtual HSRP MAC, becoming Active. >This works like textbook, what I did not expect came when I restored >Ethernet 0 on Router A (the one with a higher Standby priority), when this >is done, Router A changes HSRP state from init to listen for one holddown >interval, and begins sending hellos. It receives none from Router B, >although Router B is sending them. Router A then changes state from listen >to standby, continues to send hellos, then changes state to Active, also >changing it's MAC to the HSRP virtual MAC. At this point, Router A >continues sending hellos, recieving none, even though I can verify that >Router B is sending them. Eventually, Router A recieves a hello from >Router >B, indicating a resignation. Good. Router A is now officially the active >HSRP router and begins forwarding traffic, problem is this process takes >27-30 seconds, regardless of hellointerval/holddown timers (I tried this >with the default of 3/10 and then with 1/3 and got the same 30 second delay >in fail-back) Oh, by the way, all packets forwarded to the HSRP >interface bound for their respective destinations get dropped during this >30second fail-back blackout.any thoughts? > >Cheers, > >Lance >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cabletron
I use SSR8600/2000s and SmartSwitch 9000/6000/2100/2200s, also Matrix E7s. Overall I respect Cabletron/Enterasys for the high, raw throughput and low cost of their products, however the Menu config interface of the Switches are not as intuitive as the Catalyst line of products. Also, the platforms are not impressively feature-rich like the Catalyst line. The product line has some unforgivable gaps (mid-size switch), at my last place of employment, my team was unable to implement a Cabletron solution solely because of the massive install footprint of the SS6000 (24 inches tall). We chose Cat5505s, which provided more ports in half the space (not to mention CATios features vs. Cabletron's). The smurf attack vulnerability is interesting, if not alarming, seeing how my network is supporting a DoD mission critical Ballistic Missile Defense System. If I had any say, my network would have no Cabletron/Enterasys products. Cheers, Lance >From: "KPNY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "KPNY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: cabletron >Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 16:00:54 +0800 > >Well, I am not spreading rumour > >http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/Smurf_attack_exhausts_Cabletron_Enter >asys__SSR_CPU.html > >I am the one who reported this to CERT and Securiteam.com. During May last >year, we experienced smurf (just smurf with TTL=0) and this exhausted all >of >our SSR CPU time... So you can see the consequence. After the event, we >replaced *ALL* the SSRs with Foundrys. > >Cabletron Systems knows this (see this >http://www.enterasys.com/support/techbltn/tb1057-9.html). They can't solve >the problem 7 months after the event. The release note is not telling the >whole story. When I was on the venue, I can't telnet, all OSPF routes were >dropped, 100% CPU utilization, and no packet can get thru'. NO ACL can >solve >this problem, no rate-shaping command effective All the packet travels >to L3 and then dropped by kernel and trigger 100% CPU usage it is a >nightmare (and I am still so scared..) > >So, DO NOT USE CABLETRON. This is what I can tell. > > > >""SH Wesson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can someone give me some feedback on Cabletron hubs/switches. It is >good, > > bad, advantages, disadvantages and how it really compares to the Cisco > > Catalyst line of switches. If you have cabletron switches would you >upgrade > > to Cisco Catalyst switches or would you remain with cabletron. Please > > responsd to this email address. Thanks. > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KnowledgeNet e-learning
Group, Has anyone used KnowledgeNet's e-learning for the CCNA or CCNP courses? Let me know what your impressions are. Cheers, Lance _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Goal to CCIE by Self-Study
Your my hero... >From: WANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: WANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Goal to CCIE by Self-Study >Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 14:10:11 +0800 > > >Passed 350-014 (CCIE-Design Qualification) today, >100 choice problems, passing score is 60%, >some problems are very hard, some easy. >Not got a very high score, however, I passed it. > >Although want to try 350-004 very much, but the >Cisco gears in my lab drained all my money. >Very happy and easy now, want to share my joy and >experience with all of you. > >Takes more than 6 hours, 6 days, 6 weeks, >even more than 6 months, I finished the written >certification, here is my test history. > >640-407 (CCNA 1.0)Nov 1999 CCNA >640-441 (DCN 1.0) Dec 1999 CCDA >640-405 (CMTD 8.0)Jan 2000 >640-403 (ACRC 11.3)Feb 2000 >640-025 (CID 3.0) Mar 2000 >640-404 (CLSC 1.0) Apr 2000 CCDP >351-014 (CCIE Design Beta) Apr 2000 failure >640-440 (CIT 4.0) May 2000 CCNP >641-647 (Voice 2.0 Beta) Jul 2000 >640-447 (Voice 1.0)Aug 2000 CCNP+Voice >640-442 (MCNS 2.0) Aug 2000 CCNP+Security >640-446 (ATM 2.1) Sep 2000 CCNP+ATM >350-001 (CCIE R/S Written) Sep 2000 >350-014 (CCIE Design Written) > >Passed all tests at the first try >except 351-014, it's not easy. > >And all I have done is to study the books, >find complement material in Internet, >in Cisco Documentation CDROM, >no extra simulated problems need, >just like someone said, >if known the answer already, >who cares the questions. > >It good for me to have something to do, >especially reserch the internetwork technology. >I make it, and you can make too, not too hard. > >Best Regards for everyone. > >See you Networkers 2000 Beijing. > >Steven, Taipei >CCDP/CCNP+Voice+Security+ATM/CSE/CCAI >CCIE Design Qualification finished >CCIE R/S Qualficiation finished >CCIE R/S Lab scheduled (Nov 29/30) > > >On 5 Sep 2000 00:24:31 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Serial # >19781010) wrote: > > >Hi everybody, > > > >Starting Cisco several months ago, I find it's not a boring game to > >improve my network knowledge by digging Cisco. This April, I sat the > >CCIE Design Beta written (351-014) and failed by 6 points, so I study > >harder and harder these days. I want to verify the result of my study > >by writing the following exams in Sep, > > > >CCIE-R/S written (350-001), 28 Sep > >CCIE-ISP Dial written (350-004), 29 Sep > >CCIE-Design written (350-014), 30 Sep > > > >Furthermore, > > > >Cisco Networkers 2000 in Beijing, 16-17 Oct > >(Registered the CCIE exam study activity in this party!) > > > >CCIE Routing/Switching Lab in Sydney, Nov maybe, TBD > > > >Without any Cisco training course and Cisco certified course material, > >I study the following books and check the blueprint in CCIE Web site, > >but I am not sure if I am ready, so need your suggest. > > > >Main Study: > >1. Interconnection Second Edition - Bridges, Routers, Switches, and > >Internetworking Protocols, Radia Perlman > >2. Cisco LAN Switching, Clark & Hamilton > >3. Routing TCP/IP Volume I, Jeff Doyle > >4. Internet Routing Architectures, Bassam Halabi > >5. OSPF - Anatomy of an Internet Routing Protocol, John T. Moy > >6. Dial Solution Configuration Guide, CCO > >7. IBM Technologies, CCO > > > >Referential Study: > >1. Practice Guide to SNMPv3 and Network Management, David Zeltserman > >2. Broadband Telecommunications Handbook, Regis J. "Bud" Bates > > > >Finally, may you all enjoy yourself on the internetworking road. > > > >PS. Will answer any question about the exams I've taken if I remember. > > > >Steven, Taipei > >System Software Developer > >CCDP/CCNP+Voice(1.0+2.0Beta)+Security+ATM/CSE(Enterprise+SMB)/ CCAI > > > > > >___ > >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misco
RE: CISCO SWITCH
Shore Microsystems makes a "Autoswitch", which dual homes to two Access-layer ethernet switches. Workstations are plugged into the autoswitch, which uses a voltage censor to detect link failure from either of the Access-layer ethernet switches. The autoswitch then uses physical relays to "autoswitch" the workstation connectivity to the alternate Access-layer ethernet switch. The autoswitch is able to perform this failover in mere hundredths of a second.behold.. switchswitch \ / \ / Autoswitch | | Workstation cheers, Lance >From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: CISCO SWITCH >Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:20:04 CDT > >A better solution is a Switch with built-in failover. I.e. redundant Power >supplies/Pocessor Cards. Equipment doesn't fail often, and with hot-swap >and hot-spare technologies, you can take it off of your worry list. > >NOTE: Please disregard this message if you work in a Nuclear Power Plant, >or Weapons of Mass Destruction Facility. > > >Original Message Follows >From: "Iohan Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Iohan Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Pushkar Shirolkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: CISCO SWITCH >Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:40:42 -0400 > >Ummm...I don't understand how you can provide a switch failover solution at >the access layer. So, if you have a 24-port switch, with theoretically 24 >workstations plugged into it, you want it to failover to another switch if >it fails? You'd have to physically unplug all those cables and plug them >into the new switch! Or maybe you can have two NICs at each workstation >plug each of them into two separate switcheswhat mechanism would you >use >to do the failover then - Spanning-Tree, RIP? > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Pushkar Shirolkar >Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:36 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CISCO SWITCH > > >hi, >thanx for the reply . >but i want the switch failover solution .. not the backbone failover .. >what >if the switch itself fails .. does it failover to another switch ... does >it >have any specific failover port ? > >Pushkar > >Bob Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > 3524xl series has some redundancy functions to it if you are refering to > > backbone failover problems. ie using 2 gbic cards to different backbone > > connections and such. > > > > Also has the router IOS built in which has it's own pro's and con's >associated > > to it. > > > > Pushkar Shirolkar wrote: > > > > > hi, > > > > > > i have a requirement that says that i need to have a redundant cisco >switch > > > .. i.e. there is a LAN and the if the switch fails .. the other switch > > > should take over. this is possible in the cisco 6000 series of >switches >... > > > but is there some lower end solution .. that costs less and also my > > > requirement of ports on the switch is also less ... say about 24 ports >... > > > is there any product available which does so .. in 3500 or 2900 series >? > > > like using ISL (inter-switch link) .. but for the lower end switches >... > > > > > > Please reply ASAP > > > > > > thanx > > > Pushkar > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > > _ > > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html >_ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >__
RE: CISCO SWITCH
What if the world blows up?. The Autoswitch is a very simple device utilizing simple physical relays and voltage censors. I have never seen one die. Cheers, Lance >From: "Tim Harkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Tim Harkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: CISCO SWITCH >Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:24:05 EDT > >What happens if the Autoswitch fails? Ahh, the joys of fault tolerance:) > > >Original Message Follows---- >From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: CISCO SWITCH >Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 15:57:36 PDT > >Shore Microsystems makes a "Autoswitch", which dual homes to two >Access-layer ethernet switches. Workstations are plugged into the >autoswitch, which uses a voltage censor to detect link failure from either >of the Access-layer ethernet switches. The autoswitch then uses physical >relays to "autoswitch" the workstation connectivity to the alternate >Access-layer ethernet switch. The autoswitch is able to perform this >failover in mere hundredths of a second.behold.. > >switchswitch > \ / > \ / >Autoswitch >| >| >Workstation > >cheers, > >Lance > >>From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: CISCO SWITCH >>Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:20:04 CDT >> >>A better solution is a Switch with built-in failover. I.e. redundant >>Power >>supplies/Pocessor Cards. Equipment doesn't fail often, and with hot-swap >>and hot-spare technologies, you can take it off of your worry list. >> >>NOTE: Please disregard this message if you work in a Nuclear Power Plant, >>or Weapons of Mass Destruction Facility. >> >> >>Original Message Follows >>From: "Iohan Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Iohan Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "Pushkar Shirolkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: CISCO SWITCH >>Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:40:42 -0400 >> >>Ummm...I don't understand how you can provide a switch failover solution >>at >>the access layer. So, if you have a 24-port switch, with theoretically 24 >>workstations plugged into it, you want it to failover to another switch if >>it fails? You'd have to physically unplug all those cables and plug them >>into the new switch! Or maybe you can have two NICs at each workstation >>plug each of them into two separate switcheswhat mechanism would you >>use >>to do the failover then - Spanning-Tree, RIP? >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >>Pushkar Shirolkar >>Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:36 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: CISCO SWITCH >> >> >>hi, >>thanx for the reply . >>but i want the switch failover solution .. not the backbone failover .. >>what >>if the switch itself fails .. does it failover to another switch ... does >>it >>have any specific failover port ? >> >>Pushkar >> >>Bob Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > 3524xl series has some redundancy functions to it if you are refering >>to >> > backbone failover problems. ie using 2 gbic cards to different >>backbone >> > connections and such. >> > >> > Also has the router IOS built in which has it's own pro's and con's >>associated >> > to it. >> > >> > Pushkar Shirolkar wrote: >> > >> > > hi, >> > > >> > > i have a requirement that says that i need to have a redundant cisco >>switch >> > > .. i.e. there is a LAN and the if the switch fails .. the other >>switch >> > > should take over. this is possible in the cisco 6000 series of >>switches >>... >> > > but is there some lower end solution .. that costs less and also my >> > > requirement of ports on the switch is also less ... say about 24 >>ports >>... >> > > is there any product available which does so .. in 3500 or 2900 >>series >>? >> > > like using ISL (inter-switch link) .. but for t
Re: Colorado Networking
Sun Microsystems in Broomfield Level3 in Broomfield Check out Dice.com lots of growth around here. Cheers, Lance >From: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Colorado Networking >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:00:06 GMT > >I anticipate a move to Boulder/Denver Colorado are and I am going to begin >my search for places to submit my resume to. I am interested in opinions of >others on the list of the places there that are known as having an >extraordinary Networking dept in this area. I would be really appreciative >if someone was so inclined to send me some reccomendations! > Brian >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WHIZZ KIDS WHO HAVE THE CCIE number
As long as there is a Lab test, and it continues to evolve with technology..that would be impossible. Lance >From: "Steven V. Snead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Steven V. Snead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: WHIZZ KIDS WHO HAVE THE CCIE number >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:21:37 -0700 > >In my opion it undermines the rating hopefully the CCIE rating does not >become like the MCSE rating was. > >my two cents, > >Steven V. Snead, MCSE, CCNA > >-Original Message- >From: vr4drvr . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 6:54 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: WHIZZ KIDS WHO HAVE THE CCIE number > > >He is a coworker of mine who no longer works at Global. I think he is >about > >to turn 21! > > > >From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "McCallum, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >CC: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: WHIZZ KIDS WHO HAVE THE CCIE number > >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:33:09 -0500 (CDT) > > > > > >18, works for global data systems in louisiana > >http://www.globaldatasys.com > > > >Brian > > > > > >On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, McCallum, Robert wrote: > > > > > Here is a little poser for you all. Who is / was the youngest CCIE >and > >what > > > was his / her age when they attained the CCIE? > > > > > > Robert McCallum > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >--- > >Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Network Administrator > >ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) > > > >_ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thanks Mr Doyle.
A fellow group-member and I saw this at our place of employment about a year ago. Indeed, when running EIGRP in large, highly meshed networks with variable link rates (1.5Mb/s - 6Mb/s in our case) it is often necessary to audit your traffic patterns and tweek your EIGRP metrics. (Bandwidth, delay, reliablity, load, MTU). We ended up doing as you did, and modified the delay metric to solve the issue. .can't say I know about any bugs... cheers, Lance >From: Phil Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Phil Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: cisco GroupStudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Thanks Mr Doyle. >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 19:56:23 +0100 (BST) > >Boy oh Boy. What a week. > >Had a 2 Meg WAN link swamped. Everyone complaining. >Noticed that the preferred route (hopwise) wasn't >being taken. It was preferring taking about 4 hops >over another 2 Meg link then HSSI at 6Meg followed by >two Fast Eth Segs. Protocol is EIGRP. > >After banging my head for a while against the door and >ripping through Doylies book on TCP/IP, I noticed that >the delay on the HSSI interface was set to 200 >microseconds. Whereas the default for 56K to 45 Meg is >2 microsecs. Whipped it over to 2 and >survived. > >Thanks to Mr Geoff Doyle > >Does anyone know of a bug in IOS 11.2(18)P for HSSI >interfaces setting a 200 microsecond default ? > >Is out to TAC anyway, but just wondered. > >Regards, > >Phil. > > >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk >or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: COLT tests
I think I have to agree. I took the CCDA COLT test yesterday, and to my dismay, despite using the book for occational referance I missed 12 out of 52. The questions I missed were many of the questions I looked up in the book (DCN Cisco Press). The test contradicts the book often, and several times questions have multiple correct answers, not in which there is a "best answer" but there are literaly several 100% correct answers for each question, and you are allowed to pick just one. It did open my eyes to some problem areas for me, but this is not a route I would go for legitimate readiness evaluation. Cheers, Lance >From: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:43:56 -0500 > >COLT testsMy opinion of them is that they only confuse the issue. I counted >over 15 questions on the CIT-Pre exam that either had no correct answers >listed or had wrong answers; I even took the test OPEN-BOOK to try to get >through it. There is a very good reason that these questions are not on the >real exam (badly-worded questions, no correct choices, nebulous questions, >badly-worded answers, questions so detailed and obscure that they require a >Cisco white paper or field notice to answer, etc.), and no one has made any >attempt to improve them. What is amazing about some of them is that they >are direct mis-quotes from some of the Cisco-Press books, and some were >paraphrased incorrectly and unintentionally changed the meaning. It is my >belief that these questions were not written by Cisco but rather some hired >third-party who didn't understand the material they were asking about >(let's hope that this is the case, or else they are a real embarrassment to >Cisco!). I had to inform Cisco that the CIT-8/28 exam wasn't even showing >the gifs (they have since fixed that at least). Don't use this resourse to >make a decision on whether you are ready for the real exam, just use it as >a reference to make sure that you have covered the material. The real exam >has a few nebulous questions, but not to the extent that the assessment >exams do. > >Regards, >MLC > "Lonnie Paschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > They are practice beta exams that are avaialable to cco login users. No >charge, excellent rescource! > "Ricardo Ciganda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01">news:C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01... > Hi all! > > I would like to know what is the finality of the COLT tests. May I >have to paid for this or is only a simulation of a test? > > Thanks in advance. > > Ricardo Ciganda > Dpto. de Sistemas > Bytemaster Servicios Informaticos S.A. > _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monster Network equipment Lab on Ebay!
Lookie what I found. http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=468890595 cheers, Lance _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: COLT tests
Yes, If the COLT tests were tires, I'm afraid they would be Firestone Wilderness series...complete with the deflating effect (Sorry, couldn't help it). Lance >From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:46:10 CDT > >Thank God its not just me. I took 2 of the Colts as a pre-assesment for >taking BCSN, and thought I had no chance of ever passing the real thing and >should learn to change tires instead!! I feel a lot better knowing that >they really are as awful as I thought they were. > >Whew! >-Ejay > > >Original Message Follows >From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:27:34 PDT > >I think I have to agree. > >I took the CCDA COLT test yesterday, and to my dismay, despite using the >book for occational referance I missed 12 out of 52. The questions I >missed >were many of the questions I looked up in the book (DCN Cisco Press). The >test contradicts the book often, and several times questions have multiple >correct answers, not in which there is a "best answer" but there are >literaly several 100% correct answers for each question, and you are >allowed >to pick just one. It did open my eyes to some problem areas for me, but >this is not a route I would go for legitimate readiness evaluation. > >Cheers, > >Lance > > >>From: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:43:56 -0500 >> >>COLT testsMy opinion of them is that they only confuse the issue. I >>counted >>over 15 questions on the CIT-Pre exam that either had no correct answers >>listed or had wrong answers; I even took the test OPEN-BOOK to try to get >>through it. There is a very good reason that these questions are not on >>the >>real exam (badly-worded questions, no correct choices, nebulous questions, >>badly-worded answers, questions so detailed and obscure that they require >>a >>Cisco white paper or field notice to answer, etc.), and no one has made >>any >>attempt to improve them. What is amazing about some of them is that they >>are direct mis-quotes from some of the Cisco-Press books, and some were >>paraphrased incorrectly and unintentionally changed the meaning. It is my >>belief that these questions were not written by Cisco but rather some >>hired >>third-party who didn't understand the material they were asking about >>(let's hope that this is the case, or else they are a real embarrassment >>to >>Cisco!). I had to inform Cisco that the CIT-8/28 exam wasn't even showing >>the gifs (they have since fixed that at least). Don't use this resourse to >>make a decision on whether you are ready for the real exam, just use it as >>a reference to make sure that you have covered the material. The real exam >>has a few nebulous questions, but not to the extent that the assessment >>exams do. >> >>Regards, >>MLC >> "Lonnie Paschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8shead$gfk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> They are practice beta exams that are avaialable to cco login users. No >>charge, excellent rescource! >> "Ricardo Ciganda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01">news:C3CBB71D56E4D3119C9C00902727B15C1A21B9@bmnt01... >> Hi all! >> >> I would like to know what is the finality of the COLT tests. May I >>have to paid for this or is only a simulation of a test? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Ricardo Ciganda >> Dpto. de Sistemas >> Bytemaster Servicios Informaticos S.A. >> > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COLT tests + CCDA
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining/colt/ColtLogin.pl have fun. BTW, just got back from taking the CCDA.Passed, but those Case studies had me squirming in my chair! ;^) Cheers, Lance >From: "Niraj Palikhey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT tests >Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:00:23 EDT > >How would I take the Colt tests? Are these the same practise tests on the >Cisco web site that is for registered CCO users? I forget the url but does >anyone know the url? I would appreciate it. >Thank you. > > > >>From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:38:42 PDT >> >>Yes, If the COLT tests were tires, I'm afraid they would be Firestone >>Wilderness series...complete with the deflating effect >> >>(Sorry, couldn't help it). >> >>Lance >> >> >>>From: "Ejay Hire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:46:10 CDT >>> >>>Thank God its not just me. I took 2 of the Colts as a pre-assesment for >>>taking BCSN, and thought I had no chance of ever passing the real thing >>>and >>>should learn to change tires instead!! I feel a lot better knowing that >>>they really are as awful as I thought they were. >>> >>>Whew! >>>-Ejay >>> >>> >>>Original Message Follows >>>From: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:27:34 PDT >>> >>>I think I have to agree. >>> >>>I took the CCDA COLT test yesterday, and to my dismay, despite using the >>>book for occational referance I missed 12 out of 52. The questions I >>>missed >>>were many of the questions I looked up in the book (DCN Cisco Press). >>>The >>>test contradicts the book often, and several times questions have >>>multiple >>>correct answers, not in which there is a "best answer" but there are >>>literaly several 100% correct answers for each question, and you are >>>allowed >>>to pick just one. It did open my eyes to some problem areas for me, but >>>this is not a route I would go for legitimate readiness evaluation. >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>Lance >>> >>> >>>>From: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Reply-To: "michael champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: Re: COLT tests >>>>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:43:56 -0500 >>>> >>>>COLT testsMy opinion of them is that they only confuse the issue. I >>>>counted >>>>over 15 questions on the CIT-Pre exam that either had no correct answers >>>>listed or had wrong answers; I even took the test OPEN-BOOK to try to >>>>get >>>>through it. There is a very good reason that these questions are not on >>>>the >>>>real exam (badly-worded questions, no correct choices, nebulous >>>>questions, >>>>badly-worded answers, questions so detailed and obscure that they >>>>require >>>>a >>>>Cisco white paper or field notice to answer, etc.), and no one has made >>>>any >>>>attempt to improve them. What is amazing about some of them is that they >>>>are direct mis-quotes from some of the Cisco-Press books, and some were >>>>paraphrased incorrectly and unintentionally changed the meaning. It is >>>>my >>>>belief that these questions were not written by Cisco but rather some >>>>hired >>>>third-party who didn't understand the material they were asking about >>>>(let's hope that this is the case, or else they are a real embarrassment >>>>to >>>>Cisco!). I had to inform Cisco that the CIT-8/28 exam wasn't even >>>>showing >>>>the gifs (they have since fixed that at least). Don't use this resourse >>>>to >>>>make a decision on whether you are ready for the real exam, just use it >>>>as >>>>a re
Cisco certification logos on resumes....
Just sifted thru the certification logo usage guidelines The way I understand it, we are not allowed to use the triangular logos on printed resumes. Does anyone percieve this otherwise or is the triangle only allowed on business cards and web sites...? Cheers, Lance _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cabletron [3:81]
I work with a considerable amount of Cabletron/Enterasys equipment. It is not so bad, however, I did attend a official training course for the SSR that SUCKED. Enterasys has lots of market share because the Government invests in there stuff alot(Navy, NSA). I will say that the old SPEL management software is crap, however. I don't suppose anyone cares that the SSR8600 has L3 thruput of 32,000,000 packets per second at layer3 (blows away, and costs less than a CAT 6509 with MSFC). cheers, Lance >From: "Lowell Sharrah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lowell Sharrah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: cabletron [3:81] >Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 13:32:28 -0400 > >amen brother. > > >>> "Traister, Blake (SBCI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/25/00 12:37PM > >>> >Cabletron is the biggest piece of sh*t. They are a HORRIBLE and borderline >DISHONEST company. We bought their SPEL software and 3 training >classes...once we upgraded NT to SP5, SPEL stopped working and we needed to >pay another 3500.00 to upgrade it. > >We signed up for the training classes, then cancelled due to a company >urgencyand they still debited our account with the classes. > >Stay away from these people.. > >-Original Message- >From: lawrence sculark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 8:54 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: cabletron [3:81] > > >ccna's ccnp's ccie's what you think abou this article... > > > >From: Lawrence Sculark PMI > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Subject: > > > > > > Cabletron Systems Continues Leadership in the Modular Layer 3 >Switching > > > Market According to Dell'Oro Group > > > Subsidiaries Enterasys Networks' and Riverstone Networks' SSR Achieves > >The > > > Number One Position In Total Modular Layer 3 Port Shipments Worldwide > > > ANDOVER, Mass.-- Cabletron Systems today announced that for the sixth > > > consecutive quarter, the SmartSwitch Router is number one in market > >share > > > in the rapidly growing modular Layer 3 switching market. According to > >the > > > Dell'Oro Group's second quarter report, Cabletron's SmartSwitch Router > > > held the number one position in worldwide modular Layer 3 ports >shipped, > > > with 33.9% of the market. BUSINESS WIRE 8/16/00 > > > > >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at >http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > >Message Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=3&i=81&t=81 >-- >To unsubscribe from the Jobs list, send a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: >unsubscribe jobs > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCPrep.Com
Very good test engine. Solid, quality questions that are challenging and thought provocative. Great Token ring white paper (free). Cheers, Lance >From: "John Huston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "John Huston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCPrep.Com >Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 19:04:23 -0600 > >Has anyone used CCPrep.com and if so what is your opinion of their >services? > >John Huston >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T-1 Vs DS-1
The answer is "A"...presuming the definition of DS-1 is sans framing and line coding (SF,ESF/B8ZS,AMI). Cheers, Lance >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: T-1 Vs DS-1 >Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:02:08 EST > > > Pick the right answer here > > Q.) At what speed does a DS-1 run over T-1? > > a.) 1.536 MBb.) 1.544 MB > > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thank you! CCIE LAB, PASSED
Congratulations! Where did you take the Lab? I did not realize the issue numbers were so high into the 6000's cheers, Lance >From: "Adan Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Adan Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Thank you! CCIE LAB, PASSED >Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:12:20 -0600 > >Hi all > >I think that everybody can do everything !!! >I think that everybody must believe in something >(GOD, THEMSELVES, THEIR PARENTS, ETC)!!! >I think that everybody should have an opportunity!!! > >Thank you for your valuable comments and feedback to reach my dream. > >Adan Fernandez >Hewlett Packard Mexico >CCIE # 6401 > >!! Orgullosamente Mexicano > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rumor Alert - Lab Changes - WAS: Flame bait.
I heard a "rumor" last week that the R/S lab would be changed so that on the 2nd day, rather than troubleshooting the same network the candidate built on the 1st day, he/she would be intoduced to a DIFFERENT network to debug. Lance >From: "Constance Cate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Constance Cate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Rumor Alert - Lab Changes - WAS: Flame bait. >Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:59:41 -0600 > >Re: the CCIE Design going away, that's not what my Cisco contacts say. >My Cisco contacts include all the Cisco employees that comprise the weekly >CCIE Design study group that I attend, (they invited me, a non-Cisco >employee to join their study group!) Also includes the managers that fund >the study group; facility, lunches, courses, speakers, and a fully equipped >Design lab. >They do tell us that the CCIE Design certification is to some extent a work >in progress but they remind us that they all were in the beginning and they >all constantly undergo revision. >Also, I work with a person that is pursuing his CCIE security >specialization >and he has stated that he has done some client configuration for the lab. I >did not probe for how much or what exactly being busy with the pursuit of >CCIE R/S and Design and the job. > >"Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >009801c04e52$e9daf6a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:009801c04e52$e9daf6a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Before you all get hot thinking about CCIE specialties and the money you >can > > make, you may want to facto in a couple of RUMORS about the CCIE track I > > heard recently. > > > > Rumor #1 - The CCIE Design certification is being dropped. Why? Because >no > > one can figure what it is supposed to be or do, and the lab itself is a > > crock. > > > > Rumor #2 - The CCIE ISP/Dial lab is being revamped completely. It is >turning > > into DSL / Cable Modem etc. Don't know about the ISP side of things - >BGP, > > IS-IS, peering, etc. > > > > Rumor #3 - The CCIE Security will involve configuring Cisco security > > products on both Unix and NT boxes and doing VPN tunnels end to end, >meaning > > for the first time a candidate would be responsible for end user >equipment > > in the lab. > > > > Them changes is coming. > > > > Remember - these are RUMORS, and may or may not be true. Always check >the > > Cisco web site for the facts. > > > > Chuck > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Scott M. Trieste > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 5:56 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Flame bait. > > > > Ladies and gents! > > > > Just a thought. But I was curious as to the most vicious combination of > > Cisco paper. It's no secret that a CCIE is by far the most sought after > > cert on the planet. That being the case I'd be curious to know what >kind >of > > position/compensation someone with CCIE/Design/R&S/Security would have. >If > > in fact this person exists. Anyway, this is just a thought, feel free >to > > flame away if you must. > > > > Regards, > > > > Scott M. Trieste > > CCNP/Security,CCDP,MCSE+I+Win2k, RHCE > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetworkWorld Road to CCIE - WAS RE: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam
My money says that the author fails to get the CCIE before his 18 month projection.Nothing personal, of course, but it will be interesting nontheless to follow this guy's progression. I'm sure he will have an unlimited budget for training courses and a practice lab. Lance >From: Sam Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Sam Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Brian Lodwick'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam >Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:59:46 -0800 > >Article I found on network world. Interesting? Maybe... > >http://www.nwfusion.com/careers/2000/0821manonline.html > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Brian Lodwick >Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 5:48 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam > > >Chuck, > You need a beer, a vacation, some excercise, some kind of stress >reliever. >I do feel your cry from the trenches. I think part of the problem is, this >field gets bigger every day. The IT industry promises so much, even for the >really lazy people. If you listen to adds from some of the courses you hear >get Microsoft or Cisco certified in 2 days of classes. This cries out to >the >lazy bum on the couch that networking stuff is easy. Get rich quick. And >which certification is the grand-daddy puba of them all? -CCIE. Lazy man >says if MCSE makes $50,000 after 2 days of classes, maybe I can go to a 4 >day class and get CCIE, and then just think of all the cash I'll be making. > I do understand what you are saying. I have read and read and read and >read and read the big fat books, not just the skinny cert preps. I am on >the >track looking for CCIE in my future. I read, and fight to understand >sometimes. I read these listings to see what kinds of stuff other poeple >are >encountering, but I know I still have alot more studying to go before I >have >any chance of being successfull on the lab. I took the CCNP track to give >me >some stepping stones on my way there, and for something to validate my >word, >saying I know something about networking. The fact of the matter is that >CCIE is alot of work true, but I disagree with bashing on people. > Sometimes it takes a failure on a test to help figure out that this is >going to take alot more work. Also just think about this. Every unprepared >person who tosses that $1000 Cisco's way is kindof helping you become more >valueable. Cisco gets more money to research, advertise, purchase small >companies bottom line get a better stronghold on the market, and if you are >planning to put that much work into that Cisco certification, you're going >to want Cisco to stay on top for a long time most likely. You are going to >almost going to be a part of Cisco it's going to be your advertiser, your >research team. If Cisco sells alot of routers and switches = the market >will >needs alot of people who know how to work on that equipment. > My brother gets all upset because one of his friends sort of expects my >brother to hand feed him his MCSE. He says hey Jeff can you come over and >help me out with this TCP/IP? The guy is just plain lazy he basicly doesn't >want to have to read the material. When my brother gets all worked up I >just >say don't worry about it bro, he'll never put the effort into learning the >material and he won't ever get that certification -he's just making you >look >good. > > >>>Brian > > > >From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Hubert Pun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Cisco Study Group" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: HEATED RESPONSE - WAS RE: Lab exam > >Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:43:16 -0800 > > > > > >WARNING: The following is a bit heated. > > > >YOU MAY WANT TO SKIP THIS ONE > > > >R > > > >A > > > >N > > > >T > > > >A > > > >N > > > >D > > > >R > > > >A > > > >V > > > >E > > > > > >OK. Steam coming out of ears. I've been trying to avoid comment on a >number > >of these kinds of questions, but this does it. > > > >IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO THE F*ING WORK, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU > >DESERVE > >TO BECOME A F***ING CCIE??? > > > >The certification is Cisco Certified Internetworking EXPERT! > > > >It is NOT Cisco Certified Internetworking SLACKER > > > >THERE ARE NOT SHORTCUTS DO THE DAMN WORK, OR GIVE IT UP > > > >Sorry, but there are far too many unqualified people clogging the > >pipelines, > >for training classes and for the Lab itself. The certification is hard to > >achieve for a reason. GET IT?? > > > >My apologies for losing my temper, but I am getting pretty tired of > >spending > >all my spare moments in certification related activities while at the >same > >time seeing this kind of stuff coming across all the Cisco lists. > > > >RANT AND RAVE > > > >Chuck > > > > > > > >-Original Message- >
Re: How to Generate Multicast Traffic
Check out Mgen and Drec for Mcast traffic generating and recieving. cheers, Lance >From: "Donald B Johnson jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Vivek Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"'Washington >Rico'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: How to Generate Multicast Traffic >Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:08:54 -0700 > >Netmeeting I believe is a good app to try > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >- Original Message - >From: "Vivek Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Washington Rico'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 2:59 AM >Subject: RE: How to Generate Multicast Traffic > > > > multicast application :-), video and audio streaming software most >prob.!!! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Washington Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:03 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: How to Generate Multicast Traffic > > > > > > I have a Cisco 2500 and a Catalyst6000 using ISL. I want to test > > Multicast and see how is works, moving through the router. Anyone know >how > > I can generate Multicast traffic on a windows computer and send to the > > other computer on a different network. What kind of application would I > > use? > > > > Rico > > >_ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for a Cisco Job in Denver
www.dice.com 52 jobs for "cisco" in colorado.save me one ;^) cheers, Lance >From: "Travis Parrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Travis Parrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Looking for a Cisco Job in Denver >Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 15:08:14 -0500 > >Dear Cisco Group, > >I have used this site for all of me certifications and on the job issues >and >I can't say thank you enough for the tips everyone has given. I am now in >pursuit of a new job in the Denver, CO area and am strugling to say the >least. If any of you know any contacts or jobs openings please contact me. > >Thanks again for all your help, > >Travis Parrill >System Engineer >CCNP CCDA MCSE 4.0 & 2000 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had >a name of ParrillTravis.doc] > >[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had >a name of ParrillTravis.doc] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID beta results available at prometric [7:224]
I just called them, and a nice lady by the name of Joy told me that I passed the CID beta that I took Dec 8th. She put in the score report for me while I waited on the phone. So go ahead and call em! 1-800-204-exam Cheers, Lance _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=224&t=224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interoperability alert: running hsrp with Enterasys Matrix [7:227]
For those disinterested with Cisco/Enterasys product interoperability issues, delete now. For those who care to know, I encountered an interesting issue the other day. While setting up a test for a network upgrade I am involved with, I chanced to find some problems running hsrp between cisco routers via a Matrix E7. My implementation will consist of 2 Cat 4006s w/ Layer3 modules at the distribution layer, and Enterasys Matrix E7s at the access layer while testing hsrp between Layer3 module port-channel subinterfaces (via the Matrix E7), the switch-blade of the E7, to my dismay, restarted. Further testing, and commentary with TAC revealed a "bug" that essentially causes hsrp hello packets (224.0.0.2) to reset the E7 switch-blades running version 4.07.9 firmware. The reset occurs within seconds of the switch-blade recieving the first hello, and will render the entire switch-blade unreachable/unusable for the duration of the reset process (30-45 seconds). The Switch-blade will then repeat the reset process in a vicious cycle, as long as hsrp is running. Upgrading to version 4.08.18 firmware (on the E7) solved the problem. Cheers, Lance _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=227&t=227 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Check this one out ..... [7:537]
It's special finds like this that quench my thirst for technology. (sorry, I couldn't resist) Cheers, Lance >From: "Circusnuts" >Reply-To: "Circusnuts" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Check this one out . [7:537] >Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 00:44:20 -0400 > >Hey Chuck- it's all water under the bridge by now... or is that bridge it >troubled waters :o) > >- Original Message - >From: Chuck Larrieu >To: >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 11:52 PM >Subject: RE: Check this one out . [7:537] > > > > Ever hear of the Atlantic cable? The Pacific cable? ;-> > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >Luke > > Everett > > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:37 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Check this one out . [7:537] > > > > You idiot, did you really think that was for real??? Sending data > > through water for God's sake? > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Keyur Lavingia" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 4:54 PM > > Subject: Check this one out . [7:537] > > > > > > > Heard about IP on atm , fiber ethernet, token ring and bla bla. > > > > > > What about IP on water Pipes... I m not kidding. Check out this site.. > > > > > > http://www.dutchwater.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > KEYUR > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Message Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=587&t=537 misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=687&t=537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Optical Qualification Beta (Exam 351-020) [7:714]
I have heard from an inside source that much of the further development on the optical product lines will cease as part of the bleeding out due to Cisco's budget cuts. Lance >From: "Scott Jensen" >Reply-To: "Scott Jensen" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCIE Optical Qualification Beta (Exam 351-020) [7:714] >Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 12:13:36 -0400 > >Hello Everybody! > >I was just curious if anyone has scheduled to sit in on the CCIE Optical >Beta? > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html > >I see the beta is only US$50. After reviewing the CCIE Blueprint, does >anyone have any thoughts on how difficult the exam may be? > >I see the Blueprint lists the Cisco ONS 15900, but I believe I saw a press >release that this product has been discontinued? Can anyone verify this? > >Thanks In Advance! > >Happy Easter! > > >Scott > > > > >Message Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=714&t=714 misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=751&t=714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't get router out of "router(boot)>" mode.... [7:1921]
any suggestions..? Lance _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1921&t=1921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCPREP.com and CERTIFICATIONZONE.com
Dave, CCPREP is excellent. They just reformatted their practice test format to more closely resemble the actual exam. and they provide lots of questions (180-300). In addition, you can drop a line to Mr. Rossi and get answers to that which perplexes you. Also available are some rather good white papers. Cheers, Lance >From: "Dave Malik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Dave Malik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCPREP.com and CERTIFICATIONZONE.com >Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 01:34:00 GMT > >Does anyone have any experience with the subscription CCIE prep study >services provide by CCPREP.com and CERTIFICATIONZONE.com? > >Any feedback would be appreciated. > >Regards, >Dave > > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT-Survey of age certs and experience
Name: Lance Hubbard Age: 9294 days, 12 minutes Certs: CPR,CCNA,BFD Experience: yes Location: Rocky Mountains Cheers, Lance >From: "Prather, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Prather, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: OT-Survey of age certs and experience >Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:01:15 -0500 > >Ive been reading this list for about a year now, and this is my second or >third post (I plan to post more now though) I wanted to get a quick survey >of who everyone is, age, certs, and experience - if you dont mind. :) Ill >start off: > >Age: 22 >Certs: MCSE, MCP+I, Network+, MCNE5&4.11, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE cand. >Exp.: 2 1/2 years of experience in the networking industry, started off >working with hardware, then worked my way up the ladder. > >Future Certs: Right now im working on CVOICE, next will be CATM, and then >CCIE lab (one day) ;-) after that I am going to look into Solaris Admin > >Location: Louisiana > >I threw in a couple of extra things, but I know people here are busy, so >anything you could contribute would be nice. > >Thanks everyone in advance for satisfying my curiosity, > >Aaron Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Value of Cisco Certifications
Jim, I'll share with you the observations of myself and acquaintances. Depending on location and experience, and presuming that the level of the cert is commensurate with actual knowledge, a typical CCNA can pull down anywhere from $35k-$60, a CCNP from $50k-$90k, and a CCIE from $80k-$150k. It would be an exercise in futility to nail down a source that says "if you have x number of years of experience and certs A, B and C then you are worth $XX,XXX in annual salary. Everyone learns at a different pace and picks this stuff up to the beat of a different drummer. Cheers, Lance >From: Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Value of Cisco Certifications >Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 15:25:29 -0400 > > >* Does anyone know what the value (salary) of someone who holds a Cisco >certification? > >* - or - Does anyone know the industry standard value of a Cisco >certification? > >* If not does anyone know where to find out this info? > >(ie Someone who holds a CCNA, what is the approximate industry standard >salary?) > >Thanks >Jim > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Does Cisco give away training for big $ purchases?
Mark, About 9 months ago, I bought $400K worth of Catalyst switches for a project. The people I was working for were one of Cisco's OLDEST and most faithful customers.I tried negociating with my Cisco Rep for a class for each member of my team, but because they entrust their customer technical training to the likes of Globalknowledge, CCTI and CCCI, he couldn't hook me up. Cisco does provide internal training classes, but because of the fact that much of the material used in them is company proprietary, they are usually paraniod about letting outsiders attend. Cheers, Lance >From: "Mark Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Mark Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: OT: Does Cisco give away training for big $ purchases? >Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 10:51:48 -0500 > >Has anyone here experienced Cisco giving away free training vouchers to >corporations who purchase large amounts of Cisco product? For example, at >the company I work for I'm in the process of migrating from 3Com LAN/WAN >equipment to Cisco. We spent approximately $600,000 on Cisco gear. 3 >years ago when we purchased the 3Com equipment they supplied us with >"training vouchers" for certified 3Com courses. Has anyone had this happen >with Cisco? If so, could you please list the name of your company (if you >wouldn't mind).. My local Cisco rep. will provide me with some training if >I can let him know who Cisco has done this for in the past. > >Regards, >Mark > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLAN problems with Catalyst 3548G
Got a new toy to play with...a Cat 3548G. Problem is, that while creating a new VLAN (in this case I chose "VLAN 100"), The VLAN interface seems to have a love affair with the shutdown/Administratively down state. Anyone had similar hurdles to clear? (besides the obvious "no shutdown", it is ineffective) Cheers, Lance Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN problems with Catalyst 3548G
That worked perfect, thanks alot. The 3548XL takes some getting used to from a switch perspective, because it is so akin to router IOS, but what a slick box! Cheers, Lance >From: Ariel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Lance Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: VLAN problems with Catalyst 3548G >Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 19:12:47 -0500 > >From what I recall only 1 VLAN interface can be up at one time. Think of >the VLAN interfaces like the sc0 interface on a Cat5000 in that you can >assign the VLAN and IP address of the switch itself for telnet/SNMP or >other remote access to the switch. The difference being you don't have to >reconfigure the VLAN interfaces when you want to change them, just shut one >down and no shut the one you want to work. >If you shutdown the VLAN 1 interface then do a no shut on the VLAN100 >interface it should come up, make sure you have console access or telnet >access to the IP address you assigned to the VLAN 100 interface or the >switch may become unreachable.. > >Also note that even though the VLAN 100 interface is down that VLAN 100 >would still exist and work for any ports that belong to that VLAN.. > >This is the same behavior as the Cat2900XL switches.. > >I hope this is what you were looking for... > >Greg Myran >CCIE#5906 > > >At 03:15 PM 6/5/2000 , Lance Hubbard wrote: > >>Got a new toy to play with...a Cat 3548G. Problem is, that while creating >>a new VLAN (in this case I chose "VLAN 100"), The VLAN interface seems to >>have a love affair with the shutdown/Administratively down state. Anyone >>had similar hurdles to clear? (besides the obvious "no shutdown", it is >>ineffective) >> >>Cheers, >> >>Lance >> >>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com >> >>___ >>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exam Outlines For CCNA 2.0
Note that the objectives for the CIT 4.0 and the Support 2.0 are identical. Lance >From: "Ray Mosely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Ray Mosely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Cisco Mail List" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Exam Outlines For CCNA 2.0 >Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:49:22 -0500 > >I'm not sure of what the difference would be between IPX and >Novell IPX, however Microsoft does have NWLink which is an >IPX clone that is 99% interchangeable with IPX. Bells and >whistles. >Perhaps Novell IPX refers to the complete Novell implementation, >and IPX refers to generic use of IPX in other settings. Certain products >like Ghost and Lab Expert (Image Blaster) commonly use IPX >protocols for multicasting. No Novell involved. > >Regards, >Ray M. >CCNA > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Chuck Larrieu >Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 5:55 PM >To: Cisco Mail List >Subject: Exam Outlines For CCNA 2.0 > > > >I'm particularly interested in obtaining study materials for "windowing" Is >that the "next great thing" ? And are we allowed to bring our own squeegees >into the test center? > >Oh, and while I'm asking, anyone know the difference between "Novell IPX" >and "IPX" ? > >Oh, brother... > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Oz >Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 11:32 AM >To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Exam Outlines For CCNA 2.0 > > >here is all it says folks > >Oz >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/pdf/ccna_507 >.pdf > >The CCNA (640-507) exam will contain a combination of the following topics: >1) Bridging/Switching >Static VLANS >Spantree >Switching modes/methods >PPP > > >2)OSI Reference Model &Layered Communication >Layer Definitions >Encapsulation/Decapsalation >Layer Functions >Connection Oriented Models >Connectionless Models >Model Benefits > >3) Network Protocols >TCP/IP >Novell IPX >Windowing >IPX >Novell IPX > >4) Routing >IGRP >ICMP >5) WAN Protocols >ISDN >Frame Relay >HDLC >ATM >6) Network Management >Access Lists >Telnet >DNS >7) LAN Design >Ethernet >Fast Ethernet >Gigabit Ethernet >Token Ring >8) Physical Connectivity >IEEE Standards >ANSI Standards >9) Cisco Basics, IOS & Network Basics >IOS CLI Router >Troubleshooting >Router Packet Switching Modes >IOS CLI Switch > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3548xl and vlans
Josh, To assign a port on the 3548 to a vlan, get into config mode on the port in question and invoke the "switchport access vlan" command. this will do the trick. Switch(config)#int fa 0/1 Switch(config-if)#switchport access vlan 100 Be sure to doublecheck the port moved to the new vlan by invoking the "show vlan" command. cheers, Lance >From: "Josh Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Josh Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: 3548xl and vlans >Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:53:32 -0400 > >i have a 3548xl and wish to create 2 vlans. is this possible. i was able >to create the 2nd vlan but cant find the command to add ports to the vlan. >any help would be apprecieated. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA 2.0
A coworker of mine took the CCNA 2.0 a couple of days ago, and passed. He was disappointed with the lack of technical content, and suprised by the high emphasis on design issues, and low emphasis on the OSI model, ACLs and VLSM. Cheers, Lance >From: "BB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "BB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCNA 2.0 >Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:43:22 +0800 > >Hi, >I'm planning to take it next week. >I had go through the Office Exam guide for CCNA 1.0 and took some sample >test questions on it. >Also, I've read the ICND text book. > >I don't know how much difference between 1.0 and 2.0. >I'd like to ask if it is enough to take it now. > >If not, what else should I read? > > >Thx >BB > > > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: does it sound queer ORACLE DBA and CCNP
As we say in my workcenter, Sun, Oracle and Cisco together are the Holy Trinity of High-Tech marketability. Go for it. Cheers, Lance >From: olubunmi Isinkaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: olubunmi Isinkaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: does it sound queer ORACLE DBA and CCNP >Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:30:31 -0700 (PDT) > >hi > >My son is trying to pursue these certifications , he is >already an msce and ccna , however he has special interest >in Oracle and he is very good on programs, >he fears the two fields are too divergent , his is fear >correct?, or better still ,is there a software angle he can >combine with his cisco certification so as to be happy in >life! > >ta > >paul > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! >http://mail.yahoo.com/ > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
