Bootstrap ver vs. Config IOS ver?
Hi, all. Long time no see. I was studying CMTS 7300 series and got a problem on S/W. Bootstrap ver was 11.0 and I got configration made under IOS 12.0, then while booting it said 'Configuration under 12.0 can't be understood...'. Well, I thought I must uprgade bootstrap ver but someone said it was hardware problem. OK, networkers, I ask you these questions. What is bootstrap? How can I upgrade bootstrap? Does it have something to do with IOS versrion? If I upgarde IOS to 12.0 then there might be no such messages? And one more thing - If I have flash card in slot0 with 11.0 and same card in slot1 with 12.0 and boot up the machine, then it reads only 11.0, right? Thanks in advance! _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Jennifer and another simple questions!
Thanks for your heartful reply! Think u will help me a lot many times. :) Well another simple question are here 1. Difference between 'reset' and 'reload' command! 2. In uBR 924, there are some led and DSNR is one of them. Is it Digital Signal to Noise Ratio? When checking SNR in IOS, the smaller numbers (including minus figures) are the better performancer than bigger ones? 3. When uBR 924 couldn't give IPs to the connected LANs (not because boot problems but somewhat problems unknown), someone said this as 'Ranging problem'. Is it correct? 4. When you use 'show stac'? WowI think I am getting better because of you all. Thanks for letting me asking on! Have a nice day! _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TACACS+ privilege level question.
Hi, questioning again. We sometimes configure TACACS+ with some levels on. Well, if so, we know that 15 is the most powerful level and 0 is the lowest level (Seeing the Cisco homepage 'privilege level 1 = non-privileged (prompt is router>), the default level for login privilege level 15 = privileged (prompt is router#), the level after going into enable mode privilege level 0 = seldom-used, but includes 5 commands: disable, enable, exit, help, and logout). Then what are between them? As example, what can we do with level 6? Would all of you please tell me what I can do with each level more specific (what commands can I use in each levels 2 from 14, and what are differences among them)? I need it quickly, so I hopefully beg your kindnesses! Have a nice day and thanks in advance. ^.^/ _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anyone passed CCNP recertification exams? [7:26813]
Hi, members. =) Since I got my CCNP cert 3 years ago, now it is time to recertify my CCNP! As all of you who got CCNP in 1998 might know, I have never thought that 2001 would come while I am living...^.^; Well, anyways, expiration date is coming and now I'd better prepare the horrible CCNP exams. I have searched here and there on the web, but there were not enough informations. 'Is there anyone who passed CCNP recertification exam?' is what I am asking here. Some informations I have found out are, 1. The exam is consisted of 4 courses combination (CIT, BSCN, BCMSN, BCRAN - I was tested with ACRC, CLSC, CMTD and CIT 3 years ago. What the hell are BSCN, BCMSN, BCRAN!! Haha..^.^). 2. Test time is about 120 minutes. 3. Question numbers are from 100 to 115. O.K. I am wondering wheather the questions for recertification CCNP are just drawn exactly 'same' from the currently 4 CCNP tests or not. Of course some questions may be changed, but I hope lots of part would be just same as currently running exams. It is because I don't want buy any more books about CCNP...$P.$P If renewal questions come out, I should buy some books more and more... Well, hope to listen from you soon, senior CCNPs. Best of luck, Maxx p.s ; Oh, I forgot saying re-CCDP is coming up...^.^ _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26813&t=26813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Urgent) Split tunneling OK on Clinet S/W but not 3002! [7:28388]
Hi, memebers. ^.^/ I have been working with VPN Concentrator 3080, 3005 and H/W client 3002 these days (also VPN client S/W too!) and I could succeed on VPN + VoIP...=) However, I have no idea why split tunneling is on when using VPN S/W, but not on using 3002 VPN client H/W. Wow, quite funny, isn't it? Everything (VoIP and connecting intranet) is fine except split tunneling. All traffics go through 3005 at center. Whenever I trace a site in N/W list, it shows S/T is working fine (it doesn't show middle of the way) but tracing other site not in N/W list also shows S/T for this address is working (it does NOT show middle of the way there neither!). Ha, I can see those two shows different results when I use VPN S/W (I mean when I trace to address S/T listed, it does not show the way but it shows ALL THE IPs to this address not listed on S/T). Setting on 3005 is just same when using 3002 and using VPN S/W. I did all as Cisco says on manual, even on saying the Cisco engineer. I just upgraded the latest version on 3005 and 3002 and the result is same. What shall I do now? H/W can't split tunneling but only S/W can? Is it natural? Plz advice me, members...=) Thanks in advance! Best regard, Maxx. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28388&t=28388 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
