IEEE 802 Standards for free [7:5249]
-- quote No Charge to View IEEE 802 Standards The IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) has announced a pilot program that grants public access to view and download individual electronic (PDF) IEEE Local and Metropolitan Area Network (802) standards at no charge. New IEEE 802 standards will be added to the "Get IEEE 802" program, in PDF format, six months after publication. For more information, please visit http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/getieee802.html -- quote Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5249&t=5249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What to do [7:2201]
Go find the power supply for 1605. I hope it would keep you busy for some time. /felis John Brandis wrote: > > G'day all > I am here at work with nothing to do. I have a 1603 router spare in front of > me, and a 1605 (with no power suply). Can anyone give me some idea's so I can > either practice configs, or creating sub-interfaces ?I am a bit bored > > John Brandis > Network Engineer > GoWireless Communications > 155 George Street Sydney > +61 2 9251 5000 > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2297&t=2201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Job Fair & Cert's [7:1228]
> So play the game, list both CERTS. You might even convience them the CCNP > is more > valuable that than a CCIE. If they dont speak knowlegely of CCNP, sell Sure it is. To get ccna you pass one exam. To get ccie you pass two. To get ccnp you need to pass FOUR AND you have to have ccna. Sounds right? /felis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1360&t=1228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CAT6509 and IPX (Help Question) [7:398]
connect the user to the switch and clear CAM tables on both or wait a little bit. CAM ageingtime is 5 minutes by default. You'll be fine after that. /felis Nabil Fares wrote: > > Greetings all, > > Have a question been driving my crazy, hope you guys can help me. > > We're replacing a 55XX with a 6509 switch. Plugged the 6509 in the 55XX > switch so my customer can play around before we replace them (not the best > thing to do). > > Network--55XX--6509---Novell client > > Here's the issue: > > When the user moves his machine to the 6509, he doesn't get Novell logon > promote. All IP connectivity is working. If he moves the client back to > the 55XX, it works fine. I've enabled portfast on the 6509, no joy. Can > someone help me with some pointers? > > I hope my question is clear. > > Thanks, > > Nabil > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=416&t=398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pre-sales consultant
Great hunting ground for new job. /felis Arthur Simplina wrote: > > Hello, > > A pre-sales consultant job ( in network and system solutions field) is a > great job? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1000 series router
There's a nice little switch on a front side (opposite from connector) of a card. /felis Dwayne Saunders wrote: > > Does anyone know how to change the pcmcia card from read only to write able > > D'Wayne Saunders > ccna. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Router ID
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > > >"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > >> > >> > > The latter is wrong. The order of selection is: > >> >> > >> >> 1. Numerically highest IP addresss on a loopback interface, when > >> >> there are multiple loopback addresses. > >> >> > >> >> 2. IP address on the loopback address when only a single loopback > >> >>is defined. > >> >> > >> >> 3. Numerically highest IP address on an active physical (or > >> >>logical other than > >> >> loopback address)--active as in no shutdown > >> > > >> >I have a strong feeling that p.2 doesn't make any sense. > >> > >> Point 2 should read "on the loopback interface" Is that your concern? > >> > > > >When only a single loopback interface is defined, it's address is the > >highest of available loopback addresses, right? > > > >BTW, p.1 is wrong for ciscos. When multiple IP addresses are defined on > >a loopback interface, OSPF takes only primary address of it and ignores > >the secondaries. > > Who said anything about secondary addresses? > I thought you did. Since it's highly possible that the version of English language I studied at school is different from yours, we just simply don't understand each other. However, since you newer know who your reader is, stating the rules as short as possible is always a good idea. In this particular case I would say "RID is numerically highest addresss on a loopback interface, if there are any loopbacks, and numerically highest address on an active physical or subinterface otherwise". BTW, if we are still talking about ciscos, the above statement is true only for the takeoff situation. At flight you can add/delete loopbacks, this won't change the RID. Unfortunately, I don't have enough spares to check what happens if you delete the RID-defining loopback on the router, then create a RID-defining loopback with the same address on the other router and then launch OSPF on it. /felis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Router ID
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > > > > The latter is wrong. The order of selection is: > >> > >> 1. Numerically highest IP addresss on a loopback interface, when > >> there are multiple loopback addresses. > >> > >> 2. IP address on the loopback address when only a single loopback > >>is defined. > >> > >> 3. Numerically highest IP address on an active physical (or > >>logical other than > >> loopback address)--active as in no shutdown > > > >I have a strong feeling that p.2 doesn't make any sense. > > Point 2 should read "on the loopback interface" Is that your concern? > When only a single loopback interface is defined, it's address is the highest of available loopback addresses, right? BTW, p.1 is wrong for ciscos. When multiple IP addresses are defined on a loopback interface, OSPF takes only primary address of it and ignores the secondaries. /felis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Router ID
OK, I'm sorry. I had been grown by mathematicians. Anyway, if p.2 does make sense to you, p.4 would have to be added, describing the situation when only one active non-loopback interface exists. /felis John Neiberger wrote: > > It makes perfect sense. Let me rephrase the rules and we'll see if that > clears up the issue. > > If you have no loopback interfaces configured, the router ID will be > the highest IP address on an active interface. > > If you have a single loopback address configured, the router ID will > take that IP address regardless of whether or not it is higher or lower > than other active IP addresses on the router. > > If you have multiple loopback interfaces configured, the router ID will > be the highest IP address on any loopback interface. > > >>> "Oleg Mazurov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/6/01 8:50:30 AM >>> > > The latter is wrong. The order of selection is: > > > > 1. Numerically highest IP addresss on a loopback interface, when > > there are multiple loopback addresses. > > > > 2. IP address on the loopback address when only a single loopback is > defined. > > > > 3. Numerically highest IP address on an active physical (or logical > other than > > loopback address)--active as in no shutdown > > I have a strong feeling that p.2 doesn't make any sense. > > /felis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Router ID
> The latter is wrong. The order of selection is: > > 1. Numerically highest IP addresss on a loopback interface, when > there are multiple loopback addresses. > > 2. IP address on the loopback address when only a single loopback is defined. > > 3. Numerically highest IP address on an active physical (or logical other than > loopback address)--active as in no shutdown I have a strong feeling that p.2 doesn't make any sense. /felis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IT Career Academy?
Mask Of Zorro wrote: > > only written tests... Anybody with enough time to read all of the exam crams > and study guides for these exams can pass them. > > Can that same person be of much use in a real production environment? > Probably not. But I have seen people do this - many people. In fact, I would > It depends. The guy I hired a year ago had a paper CCNA and no IT experience at all (he used to be a baker during previous 15 years). He was (and is) doing very good and passed his BSCMSN yesterday. /felis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIT/Support passing score? Still around 692?
692 from my scoresheet which is two days old. /felis Henry Rollins wrote: > > Anyone taken it recently and care to share? I saw several postings in > the archives that mention 692, but they were from last year. > > Thanks > > -- > FREE ANONYMOUS EMAIL! Sign up now. > http://www.subdimension.com/freemail > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sample configuration of FXO to FXS voice over HDLC
IIRC there's no voice over HDLC thing (from Cisco). Forget about the voice for a moment, and make IP running over HDLC. Then make voice running over IP. /felis Andhy Indarto wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have difficult inc onfigure FXO to FXS voice over HDLC, does anyone has > the sample configuration of FXO to FXS voice over HDLC or the address of > website < because I have already try to search at cisco site but the result > is nothing. > > Thanks, > > Andhy > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simulated dial-tone
Try Cisco VIC-2FXS card. A pair of ports that are pretty close to the standard CO line. Approx. $600 a piece plus you need a $1200 cage to install it to the 3600 series, or a $3000 1750 router or 2600 router (dunno the price). Another idea is to shop for the secondhand phone equipment, some key systems are damn cheap if you buy it used. /felis "ANDERSON, JEFFREY" wrote: > > Anyone know of an inexpensive way to create dial-tone in a home lab. I > would like to be able to setup 3 or 4 analog ports (but if only two can be > done that would works too) that can dial each without having to leave the > lab - no outside phone lines. We are able to achieve this at work through > our Lucent switches, but I doubt I am going to pay a million dollars for a > phone switch (LOL). This would be great for simulating dialup scenarios. > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks again, > > Jeffrey M. Anderson > MCSE / MCSE+I / CCNA > SAFECO System Support Unit > (509) 893-8568 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Portfast
If you are not going to form the loops you can turn the Spanning Tree off. But if you connect a hub or a switch or something you are not going to switch on/off very often, there's no point. You connect the hub to the switchport, you wait 30 seconds, you forget about it forever. Conecting/disconnecting stations to the hub doesn't bother the switch's spanning tree, the switch port is still sniffing the hub's heartbeat and stays in the forwarding state. /felis John Chang wrote: > > In the below website it says not to have portfast on if you connect > switches, hubs, or routers. I understand that point but what if a user > connected a mini-hub (Ex. Linksys EtherFast 8-Port 10/100 Desktop Hub) > or unmanaged mini-switch (Ex. Farallon NetLINE 10/100 switch) so that he > could connect multiple computers. Would this cause any problems? Thank you! > > http://www-1.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html > > Note: The portfast feature should never be used on switch ports that > connect to other switches, hubs, or routers. These connections may cause > physical loops > and it is very important that spanning tree go through the full > initialization procedure in these situations. A spanning tree loop can > bring your network down. If portfast > is turned on for a port that is part of a physical loop, it can cause a > window of time where packets could possibly be continuously forwarded (and > even multiply) in > such a way that the network cannot recover. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF design question re: location of Area Border Router
John Neiberger wrote: > > Are there any rules of thumb regarding this? I looked through the > Cisco The main rule is: when you are doing routing, forget about routers (boxes). Router doesn't make any sense. Think interfaces. In your situation, when you have your interfaces on a link between the 7xxx and 4xxx in area 0, your 4xxx is an ABR. When you have them in area 1, it's internal router. If you set one interface to area 1 and other to area 0, it wouldn't fly. /felis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with the 2600 voice hang up
hi, this problem is very common. FXO does not detect the disconnect condition so cisco on FXO side keeps ringing after you hangup. Newer FXOs have battery reversal feature. I didn't work with them and don't know if they are any good. The typical workaround is to set up the answering mashine to pick up the calls when nobody's home. Works just fine. All best wishes, /felis Hu Shenghai wrote: > > Hi, > > Did somebody face the problem with voice gateway > (2600) with incoming CO trunk to FXO and Station with > FXS. > > PSTN line in FXO port ring at FXS port in the same > router. Disconnect problem with FXO > > Senario: > UserA calls from PSTN to FXO port. PLAR FXS phone > rings. Nobody pick up the ringing PLAR phone. UserA > hangs up. > > Problem: > The PLAR extension keeps on ringing even though userA > already hang up. > > Thanks > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cert Difficulty Comparison.
In my opinion, switching is the easiest of CCNP's exams, routing is the hardest. You will also meet a large amount of topics in remote access. As to the overall difficulty, it depends on a product. Windows NT server can be run by any idiot, and usually is, however to fully understand the psycho's delirium you must be a doctor. All best wishes, /felis Craig Lindstrom wrote: > > Hi, > I'm just starting my Cisco Cert and I was wondering if anyone else is > surprised how easy the Cisco tests are. I always hesitated doing the Cisco > certs because I heard they were "hard". Not that I mind a challenge, its > just I'm a little busy right now. Anyway, I just started a week and a bit > ago. I took the CCNA the Monday before last, and switching last Monday. I > felt the exams were quite easy. I passed both with scores well into the > 900s and didn't spend that much time studying. I work full time and teach > during the evenings, so all I studied was a little on Sat and Sun. I'm not > the sharpest knife in the drawer, did I just luck out on questions, or take > the easy test first, or are all the test about the same difficulty? > > I seem to see folks pooh-pooh the MCSE but I feel like the MS tests are much > harder than the Cisco ones. MS tests cover a large range of topics where > the Cisco test are a really small subset of topics. Does anyone else feel > that way or am I just way up in the night? I've decided to do a test a week > until I finish the CCNP, does this sound nuts? Anyway I am just trying to > see what other folks think. > > A little mystified, > Craig Lindstrom > MCT MCSE+I CCNA(as of last week!) SOB:) > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
