"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>
> > > The latter is wrong. The order of selection is:
> >>
> >> 1. Numerically highest IP addresss on a loopback interface, when
> >> there are multiple loopback addresses.
> >>
> >> 2. IP address on the loopback address when only a single loopback
> >>is defined.
> >>
> >> 3. Numerically highest IP address on an active physical (or
> >>logical other than
> >> loopback address)--active as in no shutdown
> >
> >I have a strong feeling that p.2 doesn't make any sense.
>
> Point 2 should read "on the loopback interface" Is that your concern?
>
When only a single loopback interface is defined, it's address is the
highest of available loopback addresses, right?
BTW, p.1 is wrong for ciscos. When multiple IP addresses are defined on
a loopback interface, OSPF takes only primary address of it and ignores
the secondaries.
/felis
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
