RE: Cisco Switches with Stonebeat [7:69505]
Bikespace, Just spent a day testing exactly this...spooky You're correct , Cisco's cannot put a multicast mac in its arp cache dynamically - BUT - you CAN put STATIC ARP entries in a Cisco pointing to a multicast mac.( Even if Layer3 is unicast) However there are some small perfomance points here ( only small !) Turning CEF on does have some benefits but not huge amounts. I threw 100 * 512 byte UPD segments at the Cisco for 5 mins while using a static multicast arp entry - It coped just fine. HTH Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69993t=69505 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Firewall 6.2.2 Inside network can not reac [7:69779]
Charles/Mark, No infinate wisdom i'm afraid - just my £0.2. Is it because the statements below effectively do nothing due to the fact the statement 2 undoes what statement one has just done ? [or have i missed the point.] 1)alias (inside) SERVERA_DMZ SERVERA_OUTSIDE 255.255.255.255 2)alias (inside) SERVERA_OUTSIDE SERVERA_DMZ 255.255.255.255 I would have thought that you would only need the statement one - why do you need to reverse what you did in statement one fro the hosts on the inside net ? regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69990t=69779 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Documention CD's [7:63940]
Just replace 'expired' with 'home' in the url HTH Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63960t=63940 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LAB 0 RICHARD 1 - CCIE#10808 [7:58745]
All, I've been waiting to write this for a long time now. I finally made it, got back from Brussels last night, dialled up this morning and there it was #10808. WOW My sincere thanks go to all who have helped me along the way. I must however mention the likes of Marc Russell, Chuck (The long Winding Road) and John Neiberger who have (along with an awful lot of studying) made this possible. Best Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58745t=58745 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3550 Mulicast [7:58334]
Hi All, Remember on a cat 5000 when you used to use set mulicast router 2/3 to indicate where a mulicast source was. Well, I've been searching for the same functionality on a 3550 - and cannot find it. Anyone know if you can do this rather than having to using igmp snooping. Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58334t=58334 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Filtering [7:57789]
Sanjay, I don't think you can do this. I understand that you can filter ospf routes inbound on an interface to stop the routes getting into the routing table, BUT NOT getting into the ospf Database. Hence you will have to filter on each downstream router to stop the the route from being propogated further. Distribute list out doesn't work with OSPF anyway as you can't filter the LSA's as such. HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57847t=57789 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Einstooge is now CCIE#10543 [7:56125]
Top Dollar Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56154t=56125 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: nat problem [7:55537]
Hi, Looking at this, there appears to be no dynamic routing happening. The gateway of last resort is on a different network than E0/0 and E0/1. Can you actually reach 10.1.255.254 by any other means ? Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55542t=55537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ip ospf demand-circuit?? [7:55501]
Hi, The answer is NO, you don't need to deny ospf as interesting traffic in the ACL. In fact , having read rfc 1793 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1793.txt)which explains demand ccts and I think that by doing this you will break the demand cct feature. OSPF requires that initially the database should be synchronised and only brings the link up when various LSA changes occur. HTH :) Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55544t=55501 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nat problem [7:55537]
Robert, Apologies - comes from reading too quickly :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55564t=55537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCO - Online Lab Scheduling Error [7:54244]
All, Just received this when trying to request a lab seat at Brussels ERROR: The 'Available Lab Seats' activity limit for the candidate has been exceeded for today. Please try again tomorrow. So if you're constantly trying to find a seat early, ie: before November - don't try too hard.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54244t=54244 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: voip [7:51729]
Jake, Have a look at the busy-out monitor command.This basically tracks an interface - I don't think that this will monitor unreachable networks or next hop ip addresses HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51731t=51729 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bandwidth question [7:49002]
Birdy, What about the interface buffer that has to cope with buffering the packets. Just because you've got 100k left to deal with it doesn't necessarily mean that the router can HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49003t=49002 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]
Deepak, The bandwidth statement only serves to inform the routing protocol (depending on the protocol of course!) as to the real bandwidth of the interface - ie - what is the clock-rate - how many bits per second can the interface shift! This way the routing protocol knows which is the better link If the bandwidth command is omitted and you have 2 links which are actually 128k and 64k in reality , ospf would see these links as equal! HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48484t=48481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP community Q [7:48132]
Annu, I was just looking at this. Just my thoughts but... Should the communities be added based on what you receive from router 10 rather than what you send to router 11. I think this has something to do with the way the router a re manipulated by the Input Policy engine. Looking at Halabi's book it says that the Adj-RIB-In ( Adjancency routing information base ) receives the routes, the Input Policy Engine then applies filtering or community attributes etc. The routes that have been manipulated are then placed in the Loc-RIB and advertise to the respective peers. I think this is correct , but you could check this by applying the community attributes based on what you receive and see if that gives you the results required. try this neighbor 180.10.10.1 route-map address in instead of neighbor 11.1.1.1 route-map address out HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48158t=48132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ip Address Negotiated command [7:47546]
Sandeep, Depending on your config then yes. ( I would have though it would be the otehr way around - many bri's dialing into a pri and the bri's getting their ip addresses ?) Look at this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ddreasyip.html HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47548t=47546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab comming Frakin' out here [7:47055]
I Know the feeling... The only way I tried to get around this was to make a very honest list of what terrified me and then learn that stuff. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47087t=47055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dlsw+ bet/ an enet rtr t/r rtr [7:46896]
Timur, Firstly, the source-bridge transparent is only needed when you have a router with both Token ring and ethernet interfaces Secondly, the source-bridge ring-group 500 command on the router with no token ring interfaces will do nothing - You are transparently bridging on this router! Thirdly, to accomodate more than two rings on a router you need this virtual ring. This is a limitation of the chips used in the routers. Have a look at this link: (Watch the wrap) I found this really useful - Solie book has some good srb and dlsw stuff too! http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ssr83/rpc_r/53999.htm HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46897t=46896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: set password problem [7:44702]
Stuart, You can press enter during the 1st 30 seconds ( No later) which will get you into the CAT and then you can reset the password(s) HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44705t=44702 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Louis Rossi's Token ring white paper [7:42885]
Hi All, I've lost my copy of Louis Rossi's Token ring white paper/How to read a RIF. Does anyone know where I can get this Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42885t=42885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIC-2FXS pinout Issue [7:42816]
All, I am trying to get BOTH ports on a VIC-2FXS card working at the same time. I Understand that the wrong combinations of pinout can cause the 2nd port to be shutdown OK so I looked at cco and have tried the following pinouts for a cable between the phone and the VIC-2FXS ports. 1) Only pins 3 4 2) Only pins 2 5 3) All pins So Pins 3 4 simply doesn't work although it's meant to be a single line pinout So to pins 2 5, pick the phone up and you get dial tone, dial a number and it rings in the handset but not at the other phone and Oh yeah , the 2nd port is in use So all pins next, both phones ring and get answered, but 2nd port is shutdown, and when you dial you can hear the ring tone BUT also the engaged tone. Anyone have any ideas Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42816t=42816 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Source Route Transparent Bridging [7:42326]
Hi All I have a question to try and straighten out source route transparent bridging r1 and r2 are connected to a 3920 r2 and r3 and connected by a cat5 --- - --- --- |r1 |---|tr bridge|---|r2 |--e/net--|r3 | --- - --- --- trcrf2trbrf 1 trcrf2bridge group 10 tr V/ring 1000 In the scenario above when we are using soure route transparent bridging the trbrf is 1 , the trcrf is 2 and the ethernet bridge group is 10. There is a Token ring Virtual ring of 1000 configured using source-bridge ring-group 1000 All numbers are in decimal! If I configure source-bridge transparent 1000 1 1000 10 I need to know if the first 1 in the config line is mean't to refer to the trbrf number confgured on the 3920 or is this just an arbitrary number to link the token ring source-bridge ring (1000) to the ethernet virtual ring (1000) in order that they can both talk. Hope someone can clear this up for me Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42326t=42326 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPP MULTILINK LOAD THRIESHOLD [7:41783]
Anthony, I think (?) that ppp multilink load threshold is used when you bundle 2 or more serial interfaces in to a multilink channel. Not sure, but I'll have a look HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41806t=41783 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: stub areas and virtual-links [7:41744]
Sean, Doyle VOl1 page 465 says: 'The transit area cannot be a stub area' From that I would assume that a virtual link could not cross a stub area in any fashion. I will check when I ge a moment. Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41807t=41744 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with extended access lists [7:40904]
Thangavel What a great method - Thank you Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40907t=40904 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: access-list problem [7:40092]
Shawn, (Unless I misunderstand what you need!!) The following line in your acl - !permit anyone to 172.16.1.0 port 80--web server access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq www Is saying 2 permit any source to get to 172.16.1.0 where the traffic is web traffic. As you would not be advertising 172.16.1.0 /24 on the internet you should really be permiting traffic from any source to the natted addresses of your web servers and not the inside address. No one will ever target the 172.16.1.0 from the outside. Hope that helps Regards Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40203t=40092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: missing Interfaces on a 1003 [7:39133]
Danny, I had this same problem but with 2600 series routers. I loaded an IOS that supported the featurs I needed but DID NOT support the interfaces physically present on the box. It threw me a bit as well. Do a hardware/Software compatability check on CCO and then look for the images that support both the hardware and features. HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39139t=39133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst Help Facility [7:39032]
Hi All, Does anyone know if it is possible to disable or turn off the help facility on a cat5. So, if you type ' set ? ' and hit return nothing happens. More to the point , if this has been disabled how can you enable this feature. Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39032t=39032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clock rate [7:38908]
Ellis, Point 1 . Pass Point 2. Loopbacks in ospf are always advertised as stub networks, ie: /32 routes. You can change the network type on the loopback by using the command ' ip ospf network point-to-point ' the route will be seen by others as a route to a subnet. HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38912t=38908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab 1 , Richard 0..... [7:38537]
OK, My turn to bear my soul I took the lab in Brussels for the 1st time on 7th March and failed. I wondered of any other candidates may like to give their opinions on a few things. I found that I was completely freaked out by the fact that I was actually sitting there doing this fabled lab , and that did it for me big time. I had prepared for the best part of 12 months ( having had quite a few years hands on ) and thought I had a fairly good chance and still think I have. I found that I was unable to troubleshoot one or two scenarios that were presented to me due to nerves. These scenarios would not have been obvious but were essentially not really that difficult to work out. I really wanted to get thoughts and opinions from those who have perhaps failed 1st time and passed 2nd. Although the questions are obviously going to be totally different 2nd time around ,did you feel better prepared and were you any less nervous? Every day that I look back at what I did ( or didn't ) do it haunts me that I missed things that I should have been able to do standing on my head. Yes, they were devious and yes I think my study preparation is shaped rather differently now. Yes there is time to do what is asked of you unless the nerves get you and then you can't focus properly. Any comments would be really gratefully received and yes I will beat this BAD next time. PS. Chuck L and John N , thanks for some of the invaluable posts that made me think about things slightly differently... Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38537t=38537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145]
Richard, Top Man - really well done - 1st go aswell. lets just hope I get the same result in Brussels on Thursday Well done again Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37170t=37145 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Network Type (In)Compatabilities [7:36781]
Tim, I have also been looking into this. As far as I know this is definate -you cannot have a the following: Hub - ip ospf network point-to-multipoint and spokes - ip ospf network broadcast ( Or the other way around ) due to a mismatch in the hello packets ala 3d00h: OSPF: Rcv hello from 192.168.1.1 area 1 from Serial0/0 10.128.10.8 3d00h: OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.128.10.8 3d00h: Dead R 120 C 40, Hello R 30 C 10 Mask R 255.255.255.0 C 255.255.255.0 3d00h: OSPF: Rcv hello from 192.168.1.1 area 1 from Serial0/0 10.128.10.8 3d00h: OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.128.10.8 Also remember that: ip ospf network broadcast gives subnet routes and DR/BDR ala r2#sh ip os ne r2#sh ip os neighbor Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 192.168.1.1 1 FULL/DR 00:00:3310.128.10.8 Serial0/0 r2#sh ip route r2#sh ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is not set 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 10.128.10.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0 -- Note subnet r2# ip ospf network point-to-multipoint gives host routes ,neighbours and no DR/BDR ala r2#sh ip os ne r2#sh ip os neighbor Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 192.168.1.1 1 FULL/ -00:01:4210.128.10.8 Serial0/0 r2#sh ip route r2#sh ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is not set 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks C 10.128.10.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0 O 10.128.10.3/32 [110/128] via 10.128.10.8, 00:01:09, Serial0/0 O 10.128.10.8/32 [110/64] via 10.128.10.8, 00:01:09, Serial0/0 ^ Note host routes | Hope this helps Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36808t=36781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multilink and callback request/accept [7:36640]
All, Maybe i've missed something here but... I configured 2 routers over isdn with PPP Multilink and that r8 calls r6 and then r6 calls r8 back. All fine so far apart from I end up with one call IN and one call OUT as follows: r8#sh isd active -- ISDN ACTIVE CALLS -- History table has a maximum of 100 entries. History table data is retained for a maximum of 15 Minutes. -- CallCalling or Called RemoteSeconds Seconds Seconds Recorded Charges TypePhone numberNode Name UsedLeftIdle Units/Currency -- Out r6 38 0 0 In r6 38 0 -- configs as follows: r6: interface Dialer0 ip address 172.168.1.6 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer string class test dialer load-threshold 1 either dialer-group 1 ppp callback accept ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! map-class dialer test dialer callback-server username r8: interface Dialer0 ip address 172.168.1.8 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name r6 dialer string dialer load-threshold 1 outbound dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 ppp callback request ppp authentication chap ppp chap hostname ccie ppp multilink Whats gone wrong Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36640t=36640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPX/NLSP Gurus needed [7:35849]
All, I am trying to get NLSP summarization working with some difficulty. On CCO it states that redistribution is on by default between NLSP areas residing on the same router and therefore have to create summary access lists to maipulate the route redistribution between nlsp areas. I have the folllwing setup which I cannot get to summarize the routes for love nor money - Help fas0/0 ipxnet 12345610Ser0/1Ser0/0 fas0/1 ipxnet 12345620 ---r1-r2--- The idea is to get r2 to receive a summary route of 12345600 ff00 from r1 for the lan ipx networks instead of the more specifics. here are the relevant configs. ( PS the fastethernet ports are not connected hence the no keepalive statement) router 1 ! ipx routing 0001.0001.0001 ipx internal-network A11 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 45.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no keepalive duplex auto speed auto ipx network 12345610 no ipx route-cache ipx nlsp r1 enable ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no keepalive duplex auto speed auto ipx network 12345620 no ipx route-cache ipx nlsp r1 enable ! interface Serial0/1 bandwidth 512 ip address 10.128.2.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ipx ipxwan 0 unnumbered r1 ipx nlsp wan enable fair-queue 64 256 0 ! access-list 1201 deny 12345610 access-list 1201 deny 12345620 access-list 1201 permit -1 ! ipx router nlsp wan area-address 12121200 FF00 route-aggregation redistribute nlsp r1 access-list 1201 ! ! ipx router nlsp r1 area-address 12345600 FF00 route-aggregation router 2 interface Serial0/0 bandwidth 512 ip address 10.128.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache ipx ipxwan 0 unnumbered r2 ipx nlsp wan enable no fair-queue clockrate 128000 ! ipx router nlsp wan area-address 12121200 FF00 route-aggregation regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35849t=35849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Round 1 to the lab [7:35410]
Scott, Really bad luck. But hey thanks for the encouragement - I have my lab in 3 weeks so that really makes me feel comfortable - not. I understand what you say about people reading a post similar to yours and thinking - this guy wasn't prepared. I am sure that is just pure arrogance on their part - I don't doubt you for a minute and will confirm this in 2 weeks Was this your 1st shot? I am sure you will win hands down in round 2. All the very best Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35417t=35410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]
Christian, I have literally 2 minutes ago had to do this. When in rommon use the variables You can set the variables as follows as long as your laptop/pc can act as a tftp server. IN rommon type tftpdnld ? this provides you with a set of variables you can use to tftp the ios without having to bore yourself stupid waiting for an xmodem install The variables are as follows: IP_ADDRESS=X.X.X.X IP_SUBNET_MASK=X.X.X.X DEFAULT_GATEWAY=X.X.X.X TFTP_SERVER=X.X.X.X TFTP_FILENAME=IOS IMAGE ( INCLUDING THE '.BIN ' EXTENTION ) You must remember that these HAVE TO BE IN UPPER CASE or this will not work and NO SPACES! now ( as long as your laptop/pc has an ethernet CROSSED CABLE linking you and the 1st ethernet port on the router - I think it has to be the 1st port ?) type tftpdnld and watch the ios install 1 million times faster that xmodem. hope this helps regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35209t=35184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please help - NLSP [7:35082]
( I did post this before so I'll try again ) Hi All, I am trying to get route sumarization working with NLSP. I have r1 that has networks as follows: Fa0/0 ipx net aaa1 Fa0/1 ipx net aaa2 I have enabled route-aggregation under NLSP but cannot figure out the acl to get only a summary of ' aaa ' advertised to r2 and not aaa1 and aaa2. configs : interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast duplex auto speed auto ipx network AAA1 ipx nlsp r1 enable ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no keepalive duplex auto speed auto ipx network AAA2 ipx nlsp r1 enable ! ipx router nlsp r1 area-address 0 0 route-aggregation ! ipx access-list summary r1sum deny AAA0 FFF0 permit -1 Any ideas would be appreciated Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35082t=35082 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VOIP Vic-2fx cards [7:34768]
Hi All, I have 2 x Cisco 2621 routers and each have a 2port fxs voice card - vic-2fxs installed. When I plug my phone into port 1/0/0 of a vic-2fxs card installed in a 2621 I get dial tone. When I use port 1/0/1 I do not get dial tone. Is there any reason for this and what am I doing wrong. Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34768t=34768 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where to place the loopback in an ospf environ [7:34445]
Rob, Very interesting. I have my lab in 4 weeks too in Brussels. Is there anywhere on CCO that details anything to do with this and why loopbacks should not be used in Area0. ?Is this OSPF Specific or LAB specific? I'll try and think about this today and see if I can figure out why. Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34447t=34445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NLSP Summarization [7:34326]
Hi All, I am trying to get route sumarization working with NLSP. I have r1 that has networks as follows: Fa0/0 ipx net aaa1 Fa0/1 ipx net aaa2 I have enabled route-aggregation under NLSP but cannot figure out the acl to get only a summary of ' aaa ' advertised to r2 and not aaa1 and aaa2. configs : interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast duplex auto speed auto ipx network AAA1 ipx nlsp r1 enable ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no keepalive duplex auto speed auto ipx network AAA2 ipx nlsp r1 enable ! ipx router nlsp r1 area-address 0 0 route-aggregation ! ipx access-list summary r1sum deny AAA0 FFF0 permit -1 Any ideas would be appreciated Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34326t=34326 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: term no mon command [7:33658]
Hi Stuart, I think (?) that term no mon only applies to vty lines. Therefore you should use : conf t no logging console ^z Hope this helps Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33667t=33658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT ,Frame Subinterfaces [7:33424]
All, I have a hub and spoke setup, r1 is the hub and r2,r3,r4 are the spokes. r1 has a multipoint subif and r2,r3,r4 have p2p subif's. The ospf net running in the wan between r1,r2,r3,r4 is 10.128.10.0/24 WAN r1 ser0/0.1 multipoint = 10.128.10.1/24 r2 ser0/0.1 p2p = 10.128.10.2/24 r3 ser0/0.1 p2p = 10.128.10.3/24 r4 ser0/0.1 p2p = 10.128.10.4/24 LAN ( static nats ) r1 e0/0 is 192.168.1.1/24 natted to 10.128.10.9 r3 e0/0 is 192.168.3.1/24 natted to 10.128.10.11 r4 e0/0 is 192.168.4.1/24 natted to 10.128.10.10 All configs look correct, but a ping to a nat address is only possible from the spokes inwards to the hub, not from the hub outwards or even from spoke to spoke. Is there an issue here with subifs? I get the %encapsulation failed % error when perfoming a ping from the hub to spoke using debug ip packet. Any help would be appreciated. Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33424t=33424 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT ,Frame Subinterfaces [7:33424]
Hi Joely, Thanks for that. However: 1 - I don't specify a source interface when pinging from the spoke to the hub and this works IP NAT detailed debugging is on r4#ping 10.128.10.10 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.128.10.10, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/8/12 ms r4# 4d00h: NAT: o: icmp (10.128.10.4, 9525) - (10.128.10.10, 9525) [191] 4d00h: NAT: i: icmp (192.168.4.1, 9525) - (10.128.10.4, 9525) [191] 4d00h: NAT: o: icmp (10.128.10.4, 9526) - (10.128.10.10, 9526) [192] 4d00h: NAT: i: icmp (192.168.4.1, 9526) - (10.128.10.4, 9526) [192] 4d00h: NAT: o: icmp (10.128.10.4, 9527) - (10.128.10.10, 9527) [193] 4d00h: NAT: i: icmp (192.168.4.1, 9527) - (10.128.10.4, 9527) [193] 4d00h: NAT: o: icmp (10.128.10.4, 9528) - (10.128.10.10, 9528) [194] 4d00h: NAT: i: icmp (192.168.4.1, 9528) - (10.128.10.4, 9528) [194] 4d00h: NAT: o: icmp (10.128.10.4, 9529) - (10.128.10.10, 9529) [195] 4d00h: NAT: i: icmp (192.168.4.1, 9529) - (10.128.10.4, 9529) [195] 2 - Whether or not I specify a source interface at r1 (hub) the pings never succeed. Any more ideas ? Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33430t=33424 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT ,Frame Subinterfaces [7:33424]
Joely, r1 (hub) interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.1 10.128.10.9 ! interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint ip address 10.128.10.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ip ospf network broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 201 frame-relay interface-dlci 301 frame-relay interface-dlci 401 r4 ( Spoke ) interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ! ip nat inside source static 192.168.4.1 10.128.10.10 ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.128.10.4 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ip ospf network broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 104 I am pinging the NAT address ( 10.128.10.10 ) at the spoke, and have tried with a source address and without - still no luck. Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33434t=33424 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Backdoor! Lab on Friday, Please HELP! [7:33423]
Just my 2pence worth, Do you have to reset the BGP connection to get BGP to readivertise this route with an admin distance of 200 ( BGP Local ) Best of luck Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33438t=33423 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sample DNS DHCP Configs [7:32801]
Hi All, Has anyone got any sample DNS/DHCP configs they could let me have for my lab. Many Thanks Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32801t=32801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Blues [7:32440]
Scott, Me too. I grasped the nettle about a month ago and wrote a list of all the things that terrified me - 30 items long. I then used MS Project and allocated as much time as I could trying to group the revision sensibly and making sure I did it!!! However, i't helped me channel my studying to make sure I tried to configure all the items I hated. You know dlsw filtering , ipx filtering isdn, learning the bgp decision process backwards, and other daft things. My lab's on 7th March in Brussels and I go through these phases of thinking: 1 - You're cool and you can overcome this blind panic as soon as you walk in the door without fainting 2 - I must be a complete idiot and will get completely flawed by a simple routing loop I read and read and read and spend every saturday/sunday and wednesday evening in my lab trying anything and everything and all my spare work hours on the lab. Let me know what you do and where your lab is. Best of luck Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32451t=32440 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Extended ipx access lists [7:31720]
Hi all, I have a lab with a hub and spoke network,r1 is the hub and r2,r3,r4 are the spokes. IPX eigrp is running on the frame cloud and IPX rip on the edge. I am trying to make sure that only network 100 at r1 is advertised to r2 and not to the remaining routers r3 and r4. Can someone help me with the syntax for the access-lists asit's driving me mad. The network is addressed in the wan as follows: r1 serial 0.0.1 = 110.1.1.1 r2 serial 0/0 = 110.2.2.2 r3 serial 0/0 = 110.3.3.3 r4 serial 0/0 = 110.4.4.4 I have tried the following acls but without success: access-list 905 permit any 100 eigrp 110.0002.0002.0002 access-list 906 permit any 100 eigrp 110.0002.0002.0002 F.000f.000f.000f access-list 907 permit any 100 eigrp 110.0002.0002.0002 0... What am I doing wrong chaps. Many thanks in advance Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31720t=31720 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That Friday Follies Question... [7:29473]
John, Thanks for wrecking my weekend too.. I tried to get this to work using the tunnel method and the secondary addressing method but with no success. My lab looks look like this r4--(igrp/27)--r2--(igrp/27)--r1--(igrp /27)--r8--(ospf /28) interfaces r4/r2 network 172.168.10.80/27 r2/r1 network 172.168.10.64/27 r1/r8 network 172.168.10.16/27 r1/r8 tunnel 172.168.11.0/27 r8network 172.168.10.32/28 I tried all combinations of /27 /28 masks on the tunnel to try and get the /27 routes into the table on r1 but with no joy. Look at this form debug ip igrp trans 04:49:59: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Tunnel0 (172.168.11.1) 04:49:59: subnet 172.168.10.32, metric=6882 So the route appears to be advertised out of tunnel0 towards r1 as you would expect , because the mask is the same. However the route never appears in the routing table on r1 although it has an interface using a /27 ( tunnel ) You do not see r1 receiving the /27 route I would like to hear your thoughts as I cannot think of another way to get around this one. Best regards Richard Botham Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29473t=29473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: secondary ip address on e0? [7:28027]
Hi Anil, There appears to be a conflict here. Is it Secondary addresses ( ie: 2 ip addresses on the same physical port) or subinterfaces. If you need secondary addressing use something like this conf t int fas0/0 ip address 10.128.10.1 255.255.255.0 ip address 172.16.16.1 255.255.255.0 secondary If you want subinterfaces you will need to set the encapsulation of each subinterface: conf t int fastethernet 0/0.1 encapsulation Hope this helps matters Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28048t=28027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Top man - Well done Let us know all about it (NDA Permitting) when you wake up Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26354t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test Center more recommended for Candidate CCI [7:26128]
Micheal, I have been using the ccbootcamp labs on my own equipment and I personally found that they have taught me many things I though I really knew well already - How WRONG can you be - eh. I am in the middle of lab eight at present and will do labs 1 through 8 again as many times as I need before March and more if possible. Does anyone else have any comments on ccbootcamp's pack of 20 labs. I'd like to hear what you guys think about them. It might enlighten me as to how close I am to attaining the standard required for the lab. Has anyone any views on comparing these labs to the real exam WITHOUT BREAKING THE NDA. Regards Richard Botham Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26222t=26128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Williams frame DLSW [7:24930]
Mike, I GOT IT TO WORK DLSW using frame in direct encapsulation,no ip addresses or routes in sight!!! Thanks for all your suggestions. I didn't use the local dlci but did change the llc2 mappings to point to the dlci closest to the frame switch for each spoke router. So if rtr1 is spoke and its local dlci is 201 and the switch dlci for rtr1 is 102 then i used: rtr1 ! dlsw local-peer dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 201 dlsw bridge-group 1 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 200 frame-relay map llc2 201 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto bridge-group 1 and the same thing the other end. many thanks again for helping me. Just hope its a question in Brussels in March Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24930t=24930 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dlsw using frame relay only [7:24475]
Mike, Thanks for that. I'll suppose this will only work as you say in a p2p setup. I will try the local dlci command as suggested. Appreciate you help here. Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24768t=24475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dlsw using frame relay only [7:24475]
Hi All, Has anyone managed to get dlsw working using frame relay encapsulation.(Direct Encapsulation) Are there any good examples anyone has that I could look at ? Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24475t=24475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dlsw using frame relay only [7:24475]
Micheal, Thanks for the reply. I was looking at using the commands as follows for what Cisco call direct encapsulation , rather than specifying ip addresses as the remote peer destination GLobal config dlsw local-peer dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface s0/0 Interface commands frame-relay map llc2 I take it that the would be the dlci of the remote peer's interface ? All the underlying frame stuff works fine as I took this from a working lab and just tried to apply this dlsw type config to it I looked at ' sh fram map ' it shows a llc2 to dlci mapping but the dlsw peer connection never makes it. Hope this makes some sort of sense. Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24520t=24475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ipx routing [7:24091]
Hi All, Thanks for your responses. However, when i do wr t the config shows ipx routing and not ipx routing 2.2.2 Is this an IOS related issue Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24254t=24091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ipx routing [7:24091]
All, I'm trying to make sure that when I run IPX routing I can identify the router by using the ipx routing 2.2.2 where the router is router 2. I cannot get this to work correctly as it always picks the ethernet mac address instead of 2.2.2 Many thanks Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24091t=24091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: X2 command on a Term Serv?? [7:23475]
Brian, Thank you very much for that information Best Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23609t=23475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: X2 command on a Term Serv?? [7:23475]
Hey CiscoNuts, I was thinking about the same problem and just read your note. I have done this and cannot get out of it without reloading the router. I tried to disconnect and clear lines but nothing helped. I wouldn't want this to happen in the exam so if you or anyone else comes across this let me know too. Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23495t=23475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP error with a BGP config!! [7:22179]
What type of router are you using. It looks like you may be using MHSRP fom the show standby CCO states that some older lower end routers using Lance /Quicc ethernet hardware will only support a single hsrp group and therefore only a single unicast mac address. Hope this helps. Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22199t=22179 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: translation/transparent bridging between tokenring [7:21651]
Erland, Try using: r2(config)#source-bridge transparent ? Source-route ring group attached to the transparent bridge To translate between Transparent and Source route bridging Get the PDF doc from cco for more help http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fibm_r1/br1fpt1/br1fsrb.htm Hope this helps. Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21673t=21651 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SnapShot Routing and Dialer Interfaces [7:20771]
All, I have read that snapshot routing is not supported on dialer interfaces - only on legacy ddr (ie: BRI interfaces ). If this is correct why are the snapshot commands available under the dialer interface It gets even more confusing whan you download case studies from Cisco's web site that clearly show snapshot commands under Dialer interfaces and also Dialer Map commands under Dialer interfaces. If I'm missing something , let me know. Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20771t=20771 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Errors in All-in-one CCIE [7:17985]
Khalid, In the nicest possible way - Preparing to be a CCIE does not include reading braindumps - If this is what you want the become an MCSE - thats easy - I know I was an MCSE (Until they invalidated it by changing the exams)years ago and then realised what a complete and utter waste of time it was Preparing to be a CCIE includes the following: 1 - A lot of hands on work and practical experiance - 4 years plus 2 - Being able to spot the errors in the books that are published 3 - Reading the better books around - Doyle/Halabi/Caslow/Kennedy etc 3 - Dedication Remember you cannot braindump a lab exam Best of luck in your efforts - but learn properly - you'll come unstuck in a big way otherwise. Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18047t=17985 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ospf summary address issue [7:16357]
Hi All, I have the following addresses 152.1.1.65/32 152.1.1.97/27 152.1.1.72/32 152.1.1.69/32 152.1.2.2/30 and have created 2 summary addresses of 152.1.1.0 /24 and 152.1.2.0/24 so that i can redistribute them into an igrp process that is addressed with a 24bit mask. The summary routes appear when I use show ip ospf summary-address, they do not appear in ospf routing table and are not redistributed into igrp. Is this because the routes that make up the summary have a longer mask than the summary and therefore not entered into the ospf routing table Any thoughts appreciated Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16357t=16357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ospf summary address issue [7:16357]
All, Thanks for your help - I KNEW THIS - WHAT WAS I THINKING OF. Sorry to have wasted your time Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16389t=16357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
