Re: How far by self study?
erm, interesting Richard Holland - Original Message - From: "Brad Ellis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 11:56 AM Subject: Re: How far by self study? Bragging isnt allowed until you have a CCIE # after your name... :) -Brad ""Lou Nelson"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 010801bfe375$27c71320$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:010801bfe375$27c71320$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... a WOW... Impressive.. I mean I am impressed You should get a job though... and if you tell me you did this while working a full time job... then I quit grin Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA - Original Message - From: "Aaron Prather" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 12:09 PM Subject: Re: How far by self study? I got the following certs all by self study: MCSE MCP+I MasterCNE CNE5 CCNP+Voice CCDP Network+ CCIE written test (hard test) All together that is almost 30 tests and no official courses, only books (and hands on.) Not bad for a 22 year old eh? :) Aaron ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for CVOICE Books
I don't remember the URL, forgive me. I hope somebody here does. But there's a telecom site about Voice over whatever somewhere, kind of like the frame relay forum. But it deals with general telecom, with a huge section of links and whatnot concerning voice and data sitautions. A good friend of mine is a voice and SS7 buff, and claims that all the information you could ever want or need is on the internet somewhere or another. Voice is a young topic, even though it's been around for a good amount of time, there isn't a lot of good texts on it from what i've seen. Richard Holland CCNP,MCSE - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "John Dill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 7:06 PM Subject: RE: Looking for CVOICE Books I just finished Gil Held's Voice Data Internetworking. Good overview, some good detail. Even though it is a second edition, it still seems just a bit dated in some areas. For example, no mention of FRF.12. Lots of protocol stack diagrams. I have read bits and pieces of Elliot Lewis' Configuring Cisco Voice Over IP Has a lot of specific configuration information and examples. Have liked what I have read. A while back Priscilla said she was working with someone at Cisco who was writing a Cisco press VoIP book. I hope she pops in on this, because I failed to save that message, and now I don't remember the author. :- Chuck CID/CCDP test Friday - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Dill Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Looking for CVOICE Books Dorothy, I think Robert Caputo's book, "Cisco Packetized Voice Data" is an excellent reference for Cisco Voice in the field, and a great supporting reference for CVOICE. - John "Edmondson, Dorothy M" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/28/00 01:47PM I am studying for the CVOICE exam. Any recommendations on reading materials? Are there any CVOICE books out? Thank you. Dorothy Dorothy Edmondson, CCSI, CCNP, CCNA, CCDA WCS Learning Networking Solutions Education *Mail: NCR Corporation 101 W. Schantz Avenue, ECD-1 Dayton, OH 45479 * E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Office: Voice: 937 445-4133 VP 622-4133 FAX: 937 445-0850 ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Advice for a Newbie setting up a lab
This one's easy to answer: dump as much money as possible on routers, token ring equipment, beer, and maybe, if you're married, pay your wife off. Nah, but really, I would buy a few 2500 series, mix ethernet and token ring, if you have the cash, buy as 2509 and 2511 to use as an terminal server, makes it easier. You can get away with buying an old AGS+ tohook a bunch of serial connectios up to, or use as a frame-relay switch, but they wont run the newer IOS, I think they run somewhere in the 10.x's, enterprise though if I remember. A 4000 with a few serial modules makes for a good big daddy router, maybe buy a catalyst switch with the same IOS style that the cat5k's have, these are hell expensive. Anyway, the real lab has about 6 routers and 1 cat5k, so buy a 4000, some kind of switch, and fill the rest with 2500's. Also note that Oz, a member of this list, has some deals posted, I'd check them at, he has kits and what not, good resource, we all love Oz. And don't try to quit smoking, and if you can, have some sex, have fun, Cisco wants you too, they party. Richard Holland CCNP,CCNA,MCSE - Original Message - From: Vinton Smith To: cstudy Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 11:23 PM Subject: Advice for a Newbie setting up a lab Hey all, I am currently enrolled in a CCNA course and have access to make a lab using 2501 and 2503 routers. I would like some advice on setting up a lab. Any advice would be apperciated. Where to get cables from and setting them up etc. Thanks in advance, Vinnie
Re: OSPF Process ID
The process id in OSPF is basically so you can run more than a single OSPF instance on a given router(s). At first it would seem unclear as to why you would want to even run more than one OSPF instance, but think about this: You work for company A, you have a large multiple area OSPF network, your healthy routers slap the hello packets out, flood LSA's, all is good. Then Johnny Q. Corporate, your CEO, decides to buy Company B to narrow competition down, Company B also has a large multi area OSPF network, but their timers are different, your routers can't deal with these "invalid" Hello packets coming in, so to merge the two networks together, you could make the router(s) hooking Company A with B together run one OSPF instance for Company A, and one for B. This saves you a hell amount of time on reconfiguring routers, provided you can redistribute effectively. Isn't this what an AS does? Not by nature, althought it does end up being one use of an AS, and especially in this situation. AS's also discuss route policy, it's the 90's. Or maybe you have two networks that don't connect together, but they share one router. Again, it's best to use seperate OSPF id's for each, than try to filter and the like. Richard Holland CCNA,CCNP,MCSE,MCP+I OpenBSD,Telephones,Cars,Money - Original Message - From: Henrique Issamu Terada To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 3:02 PM Subject: OSPF Process ID Hi people I apologize if my question is a little bit stupid , but I cannot understand the ospf process id. Should it not be the AS ? Why ? Henrique Issamu TeradaCPM Comunicações - BrazilCCNA Certified
Re: Need Documentation Database NOT MGMT software
Something like this could be easily written, Delphi, ANSI C under some UNIX based OS, you could interface it with postgresql or mysql to make queries, web based or whatever. There are, of course, other ways.. Richard Holland CCNA,CCNP,MCSE,MCP+I - Original Message - From: "Kristofer Arthur" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 4:11 PM Subject: OT: Need Documentation Database NOT MGMT software I know some of you mentioned HP OpenView, CiscoWorks, WhatsUpGold however, I am not looking at visual network management tools. I am seeking a database template or software that will allow me to lookup PVCs, contact names/numbers, circuit info, billing info for the site, T1 channelization, router serial #s, router maintenance contracts, multiple IP addresses on multiple interfaces, PPP and Frame relay circuits. If the software also had some change management functionality that would be good to as I often upgrade circuits, add PVCs, send new routers to new sites. Right now my documentation is in Word, Excel, and Notes. I want to use one piece of software to the job. I'm not really looking for something like Visio Enterprise. I just need to put all of this info in a database (Notes, Access, 3rd-party product) so that I can keep track of my network and the changes. This will allow me to DO THE DOCUMENTATION IN VISIO! I've got about 100 sites with more coming. How do you guys do this? Do you even keep track of everything in a relational database? Do you only rely on Visio Enterprise? Or do you even care about documentation? :( Please help - new WAN guy needs your help! Thanks in advance! Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Win2000 HyperTerminal
I've grown to really dislike Hyperterminal, I use SecureCRT for console connections as well as to SSH into my various Free and OpenBSD servers (pree OpenSSH of course). It does cost a little cash. I forget how much, I think $50. Richard Holland CCNA,CCNP,MCSE,MCP+I - Original Message - From: "Westmoreland, Alexis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 8:59 PM Subject: Win2000 HyperTerminal I have noticed that the up arrow does not work (to repeat the line on cisco routers) with the Win2000 vers of HyperTerminal. Does anyone know a fix for this problem? I have tried upgrading it to no avail. Thanks in advance. Thanks Alexis A. Westmoreland Getronics Network Engineer (713)852-5402 ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Equipment
2500 series routers are fine, I just bought two for my home lab. They're cheap (in terms of Cisco hardware) and easy to find, especially on ebay. 2600's can get expensive. The main thing to remember is: get IP enterprise IOS, and make sure the routers you get have the interfaces you want. If you do that, you can't go wrong. My routers use 11.3 and 12.0, try to stick with 11.2 or 11.3. Richard Holland CCNP,MCSE - Original Message - From: "James Kavenaugh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 10:30 PM Subject: Equipment Hi, I have a question about equipment. I just recieved my copy of routersim in the mail. Still trying to figure out what kind of shoddy routers it actually simulates. Anyway I was going to buy the real equipment anyway, pick up a couple 2501's. A co-worker had said to get the 2600 series instead because it is newer and would be easier to sell later on. Personally I'm not to worried about loosing $$ because I get lots of enjoyment out of this sort of thing. Anyway he had also told me not to buy routersim so I'm wondering if he's right about the 2600's also. So I'm asking the list for advice on this. Thanks! James ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Who wants to be a CCIE... Challenge Question
perhaps, ring-speed 4|16 needs to be added under the to0 interfaces? Richard A. Holland CCNP,MCSE ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Checkpoint firewall
This is a bit off-topic, but I recall a discussion of using Checkpoint
firewall, and thought I'd share a SANS security newsletter concerning
checkpoint.
"It's possible to use various fragmented packets (such as those generated by
Jolt2.c) to cause the firewall to crash or operate at 100% CPU utilization.
Firewall rules are ineffective for defense. More information is in this
issue as item {00.24.025} ("Check Point FireWall-1 fragmentation DoS")."
I could forward the complete message to anybody interested.
Richard A. Holland
CCNP,MCSE,OpenBSD
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frame relay newbie question
I wouldn't look to see IPX/SPX dissappearing anytime soon, It'll take a lot of time and money for a company or organization to convert their IPX network to IP, for example. (If I remember correctly Netware 5.0 and beyond uses and will USE IP from now on, phasing IPX out, am I correct?) Richard Holland CCNP,MCSE - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Dan West" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 8:11 AM Subject: RE: frame relay newbie question Is it common/practical to run IP and IPX over the same frame relay subinterface? CL: Yes. Why not? ( he asked rhetorically, meaning he does not expect anyone to answer ) I am only asking because in Lammle's CCNA prep book it is mentioned that one of the advantages of subinterfaces is that you can run IP on one and IPX on another. BUT, the example directly following that statement shows IP and IPX running on the same subinterfaces. CL: the lab is still down so I can't do a quick and dirty here. if we were running ip and ipx to the same location on different subinterfaces would we need two pvc's? can one configure the same dlci on two different subinterfaces if the other side is the same? pvc's cost money, normally. so why would one add expense for this sole reason? Cain't tell ya! but your question brings to mind a lab to try. More importantly, is IPX even going to be an issue much longer? CL: one can hope not, but then again, AppleTalk and Token ring are still around :- Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE lab question
Ladies and Gentleman, I don't see this violating the NDA, but if so.. I apologize. When you take the lab, do they give you a block of ips for IP, and cable ranges for appletalk and let you address the devices the way you and the directions dictate? Is your topology created by you, or do they tell you "hook router 1 into router 2 , using both Serial 0 interfaces"? I'm just trying to find out how you know what topology you're drawing out and how much design in the addressing they do for ya. My thoughts are they give you address space, you address devices based on the lab's needs, and they tell you in the directions what cables go where, then you can draw the topology out. Richard Holland CCNP,MCSEOpenBSD
traceroute question
A little bit of strange behavior, first off my setup: Cisco 2501 with IOS 12.0.9 Enterprise Cisco 2504 with IOS 11.2 Enterprise Cross over DTE-DCE cable connecting their Sync Serial ports together Right now im running hdlc b/w them, i've tried ppp, frame with maps, no inv-arp, etc.. it made no difference. then network on the interfaces is 192.168.1.0/30 I have connectivity, ping works great, trace does NOT work hardly at all though. RouterA-DCE#Trace RouterB then it hangs for a good 3-4 seconds normally the trip times are 8ms * 4ms as you can see, the middle time is a *, debug ip icmp shows the port unreachables being sent and recv'd (two of them). Now the oddball part is, if you feed it no ip classless, the router broadcasts (255.255.255.255) the icmp packets out all the interfaces except Serial0, unicast on it.. this makes it take even longer! (normally 3 broadcasts 1 unicast/unicast reply, 3 broadcasts, etc) Any idea what's up? NO other networks configured on the router (which also gets rid of the broadcasts), routing table just has the connected route to 192.168.1.0/30 out Serial0 Richard Holland CCNP/MCSE
Re: Good OSPF study material
If you don't own Jeff Doyle's "Routing TCP/IP Volume I" (part of Cisco Press "CCIE Professional development" series), get it. The largest chapter in the book covers OSPF, couple that with reading the design guides, etc on CCO - and you'll be an OSPF Ninja. I recommend this book to anybody who does not own it (note: this book does NOT cover BGP, pick up Halabi's book, read both of these books, complement with your own lab work and cco, you'll understand routing %80 better than you did before :)) Richard Holland - Original Message - From: "Kevin Welch" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 6:36 AM Subject: Good OSPF study material I was wondering if anyone could recommend some good study material for OSPF. I am currently studying for my BCSN and do not feel I have a good grasp on OSPF. Is there a book that anyone would consider to be the OSPF Bible? I searched the archives and saw one person recommended OSPF Network Design Solutions and OSPF: Anatomy of an Internet Routing Protocol seemed to get a good review on Amazon. Would anyone care to comment on these books or make other recommendations? -- Kevin ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Interview Question - OSPF
I at no point said it was a good idea I know VLSM and discontigous subnets break rip - we don't know enough from the previous post to make assumptions. I can agree that it's rare to find REAL networks with contigous subnets, and the same length subnet mask network wide, but it happens. I know it's pointless to run them both like that, RIP would just consume bandwidth, processor, and depending on the design of the internetwork, break routing all together Redistribution is a wonderful thing, easy to implement, and efficient The point of my post wasn't to argue these points. You mentioned you would call somebody stupid, flat out, if they wanted to run rip and ospf network wide. I don't agree with that, perhaps the "stupid" individual doesn't understand VLSM and contigous subnets, maybe he thinks ospf and rip will operate like normal, and the ospf routes will be put in the route table before the rip routes due to admin distance, maybe he hasn't heard of redistribution? That isn't stupid.. just uninformed. Anyway, I didnt mean to start a big flame, so I apologize for picking your spelling apart, I just dont like it when people take the "this guy's an idiot" towards people who are just a tad bit mis-informed. So, to make this thread worthwhile, to the originator of this thread and the guy who mixed ospf and eigrp up: 1) EIGRP is the protocol that can handle ip,ipx,apple 2) running rip and ospf network wide, with no redistribution scheme at all will BREAK routing in all but a few rare situations, and in those situations where it wont completely destroy the routing tables network wide, it would merely consume bandwidth, and serve no purpose. 3) RIP can't handle VLSM (Variable Length Subnet Mask, aka dividing an address space unequally) but can handle subnetting where you use the same length mask network wide. 4) Due to RIP's auto summarizing, it doesnt advertise subnets out an interface on a different network, rather it advertises the entire network, so if you have 192.168.1.1/30 -- (routera) 10.1.1.1/8---10.1.1.2/8- (routerb)192.168.1.5/30 you can see, 192.168.1.0 is split with the 10.0.0.0 network, so routera will advertise 192.168.1.0/24 out on the 10.1.1.1 interface, and routerb will advertise the same out it's 10.1.1.2 interface. So both router's learn they have routers to 192.168.1.0 through each interface..you can see how this breaks routings. This demonstrates how discontigous subnets break rip, but if you put a secondary addresse on the 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2 interface, maybe 192.168.1.9/30 and .10/30, then you would create a contigous subnet, and rip would function correctly (note you would have 2 packets coming out on the 10.0.0.0 segment per router, one for the primary and one for the secondary address, consuming double the bandwidth). Maybe im misinformed? This is the information i've learned from reading Doyle's book, and running these protocols at work. Richard - Original Message - From: "Dollard Morgan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Richard Holland'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Dollard Morgan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 9:55 AM Subject: RE: Interview Question - OSPF oh, yet another spell checking maniac. im sorry, in the posting requirements for this site, no one ever mentioned spell checking as being required. dont mistake a typo for a spell check as well. and instead of talking about me being arrogant (which i am not) , prove to me that it isnt stupid. rip by default, since it wasnt specified, is V1, therefor no VLSM used, and since ospf does use it, it stands to reason it would be used, since it is on most networks today, so that means rip is gona find discontiguous networks left and right, great for the waste of your routers processing time. and your gona get rip chatting on your network for no reason, plus the endless routes unreachable you will get since rip's max distance for a reachable host is 15, add to that the fact that you might have nt stations or unix listening passively for rip updates to learn their gateway from, YES, IT IS STUPID! either prove me wrong, and flame at will, or keep your opinion about my personal characteristics to yourself. it wasnt meant as a personal insult to any1, it was more meant to in the nature of a little laugh. seriously, give me one good reason, why youd run both ospf and rip on the same networks, and the same routers. not talking about an asbr ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which should I start with? (CCNP)
It really just depends on what you know/don't know. If you've never used/dealt with Catalyst 5000/5500 switches, then CLSC will be, for the most part, new water. ACRC builds from what you learn from the CCNA.. I had strengths with routing, so i did the ACRC, I decided to do the CLSC instead of the CIT next. The CLSC has CIT has information from the ACRC and CLSC. CIT was next, then I tackled CMTD. The bottom line is, do what is best for you, some people like to start hard and end easy, some of us like to start easy and end with the harder ones... Richard A. Holland CCNP - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 12:46 PM Subject: Which should I start with? (CCNP) Hey Group, I just got my CCNA and am moving onto CCNP. I'm not sure which is the best to start with. I think I remember that people were saying to go with ACRC first but I could be wrong. Could I get a couple opinions on this. Thanks in advance, Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA (215) 340-1440 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Dialing status
debug dialer debug q931 both give calling info - Original Message - From: "Tan Choh Koon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CiscoGroupStudy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:58 AM Subject: ISDN Dialing status Hi, How can I view the real time dialing status of the ISDN on the Cisco router. The show isdn active/history ..do not show whether it is dialing or disconnecting. Thanks Choh Koon, Tan CCNP ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Dialing status
I meant to say debug isdn q931, doh :) Richard A. Holland CCNP
Re: Help with Frame Relay over DTE/DCE cable
You can build a tiny frame cloud with two routers, I'm doing it now until I get my other two. (im using a 2502 with IOS 11.2 and a 2501 with IOS 12.0). What I do is : frame switch: frame-relay switching int interface encapsulation frame-relay ip address x.y.z.a mask frame-relay intf-type dce clockrate 100 frame-relay interface-dlci 100 I read that you don't use the interface-dlci command unless you have multiple dlci's on one physical connection (using subinterfaces), but if I dont do that, or a route statement, the dte router can't use inverse arp..neither router is aware of dlci numbers. Using this configuration, I can't ping my side of the dlci, but it doesn't seem to break anything.. Richard Holland CCNP,MCSE Well Bob, are you trying to build this with only 2 routers? I am not sure you can do that... Typically it looks like this: R1---Frame Switch (R2)---R3 R2 (the frame switch) provides DCE to both R1 and R3. Set the clockrate on one of the switch interfaces. R2 needs the following: Frame Relay Switching enabled (frame-relay switching) DCE set on each interface (frame-relay intf-type dce) Clockrate configured (clockrate 56000) Frame Relay Route statements to announce DLCI's to each side and connect the R1 and R3 into a PVC. (frame-relay route 102 s0 201) R1 and R3 need: Frame Relay encapsulation on the serial interface that is connected to the switch. (encapsulation frame-relay) Optional: You may want to configure frame-relay map statments on R1 and R3 to turn off Inverse-Arp. This step is optional. You may also wish to configure the Frame Relay LMI type... If you are trying to configure only half of the connection, ie one router as DTE and one router as the switch, I don't think that this will work. You may see LMI going back and forth (debug frame lmi), but I don't think so. You certianly will not see the interface stay up because the PVC is not complete. I have not tried to configure the switch to route right back out the same interface (frame-relay route 102 s0 102) to see if it will receive frames on s0 and send them out on s0 too, but I don't think it is legal to do this... You may need to get a 3rd router to make this work (if you do not alreay have one.) I hope this helps... Dale [=`) From: "Bob" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Bob" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with Frame Relay over DTE/DCE cable Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:57:18 -0400 I am trying to configure Frame Relay over a DTE/DCE cable, but even with a clock rate set on the DCE side, and frame relay switching configured on one of the routers, and the int on the switch configured as a interf-type DCE, I am still always getting it to go up for a second on reload, but then it drops again right away, and the line protocol goes down. can someone please help me with this? Thanks Rob ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
