Re: CCIE Salary v2 [7:15032]
Let me clarify... I do not wish to unsubscribe, although there are times... it's just that this is the second or third email I recieved from this individual over the past several weeks. Maybe it's a hotmail bug???!!! From: Bob Dixon To: vr4drvr . Subject: Re: CCIE Salary v2 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:13:33 -0400 To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab - Original Message - From: vr4drvr . To: Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:41 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Salary v2 Firstly, you completely missed the point of my email. You probably didn't even read it, or comprehend it for that matter. Secondly, why do I continue to get this garbage in my email? Adrian Smith Network Engineer From: Roberto Iannuzzi Reply-To: Roberto Iannuzzi To: vr4drvr . , Subject: Re: CCIE Salary v2 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 18:25:39 -0400 CCIE's are among those most talented computer people in the world. That's why they are CCIE's. You can say whatever you want but the fact is CCIE's leave most people scratching their heads when it comes to technical prowess. Companies drool at the thought of having a CCIE for whatever reason and Wannabee CCIE's belittle the credibility of a CCIE because they could NEVER be one. - Original Message - From: vr4drvr . To: Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:47 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Salary v2 I don't think everyone on this list quite understands what the CCIE represents to the corporation. I will admit that it is a great way for technical people to increase their skill sets in order to help them in their profession. But the main reason companies were offering so much for them was not necessarily due to the technical prowess that is supposed to come with a CCIE. You see, having a number of CCIE's on staff means the company can get deals with Cisco. It is a business reason more than a personnel reason, as is ALWAYS the case with businesses. It is all about the bottom line! If IT is slowing then so is the need for the deals (CCIE's), but not for skilled individuals. I know of CCIE's that just couldn't survive in the real IT world, but not all. I am not detracting from the CCIE, I just want to clarify. From: Roger McNeace Reply-To: Roger McNeace To: Subject: CCIE Salary Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:48:43 -0400 I apologize if this distracts form the true purpose of this forum, but I believe this is an important issue. I work for a large Telecom company that is laying off a lot of engineers, so I have been forced to look at the job market for opportunities. I have seen many job postings that say CCIE required with a salary range of $70-$90k. I am doing better than that without a CCIE. My questions is this a market phenomenon or have the recruiters in lost their mind? I hope this is not a trend that CCIE is losing its value in the market place. I am not pursuing CCIE status soley for the money, but sure as hell dont want to go backwards. **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15032t=15032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Frame Relay Q [7:14495]
Has anyone ever configured a hub and spoke FR topology (2 seperate subnets) with a single DLCI at each point? If so, please explain how. I always understood that the hub had to have 2 DLCI's for this to work. TIA. Adrian Smith Network Engineer AIM: vr4drvr _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14495t=14495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WHIZZ KIDS WHO HAVE THE CCIE number
He is a coworker of mine who no longer works at Global. I think he is about to turn 21! From: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "McCallum, Robert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WHIZZ KIDS WHO HAVE THE CCIE number Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:33:09 -0500 (CDT) 18, works for global data systems in louisiana http://www.globaldatasys.com Brian On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, McCallum, Robert wrote: Here is a little poser for you all. Who is / was the youngest CCIE and what was his / her age when they attained the CCIE? Robert McCallum _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:
read more carefully--they are referring to multiple router ports from the same router. lets save the sarcasm... From: "Lowell Sharrah" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Lowell Sharrah" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:26:22 -0400 what are you guys talking about? of course you can have two or more routers sharing the same ip subnet. ever here of a backbone? "Donald B Johnson Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/00 03:52PM can we see the config on that one i cant get it to work Duck Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8rv8ve$vp1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8rv8ve$vp1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Just one minor correction Of course you can have multiple router ports on a single subnet!! Why couldn't you?!?!? I just happen to have that implemented here... it's called hhhmmm.. a backbone!! ""Guyler, Rik [EESUS]"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... No, 2 router ports cannot be on the same subnet. You can, however, setup HSRP (Hot-Standby Router Protocol), which will give you the redundancy you need. This requires 2 routers but gives you complete router redundancy and not just port/link redundancy. Search for HSRP on www.cisco.com. Rik -Original Message- From: Kedar Deshpande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: stupid questions Hi, Is there any way that we can connect two ethernet ports of routers on same network have redundancy between them? regards, **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another interview question
The key to this issue is HOW cisco looks up routes AND the effect of "(no) ip classless (classful vs. classless lookups)." To begin, the router determines the classful network of the route in question, then proceeds to lookup a more lengthy match within these routes. If it does not find a match it does one of two things depending upon whether or not "ip classless" is configured. If it is not configured (ie. no ip classless) it will not look for any other matching routes. If it is(ie. ip classless), however, it will go back and do a classless lookup, which is always matched with the 0.0.0.0 route. In a sense it works its way back to a route that, at LEAST, matches. Another good question is how does the route 0.0.0.0 always match? More precisely, what is done to the route in questions so as to arrive at a route of 0.0.0.0? Hope this helps. From: Francisco Muniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Francisco Muniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Another interview question Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:50:24 -0400 The router is thus configured: no ip classless ip route 167.216.128.0 /22 s1 ip route 167.216.240.0 /24 s2 ip route 0.0.0.0 /0 s0 and packet to 167.216.241.3 comes in, what does the router do? Answer: it drops the packet Why? Why doesn't it go out the default gateway? Anyone? Francisco. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Cisco + Checkpoint
Hi. Has anyone set up a VPN with a cisco router going to a CheckPoint firewall? I'm sure that it can be done using standards based configs, but are there any issues that I should research before the imp? TIA. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Checkpoint question
I wouldn't actually recommend checkpoint to any client. Check out some of the hacker sites to see how easily it can be breached. If you need more info let me know. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Checkpoint question Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:57:13 EDT Hi: Do any of you have any experience with the Checkpoint training. Is it worth it? Thanks, KF ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: bandwidth analysis
does anyone have a model for bandwidth forecasting based upon user classification (ie. Residential vs SOHO vs Business)? TIA. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Wireless
Has anyone had experience with Point to Point Wireless as opposed to a local T1 or T3 scenario? I need to connect sites in a hub and spoke fashion, and I would like to connect them with Wireless as the frequency has already been purchased. Any info is greatly appreciated. TIA. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Need BGP4 book
i have been informed that there is a cisco "whitepaper" on bgp somewhere in the recesses of cisco's site, and this document is apparently much better than IRA and goes into much more detail (designed for the more technical) and is highly recommended for the lab exam. if anyone has any info please pass along... From: Fomes Iain [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Fomes Iain [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: Need BGP4 book Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 10:45:47 -0400 Yeah the cisco press book on bgp is excellent funnily enuff -Original Message- From: Josh Youngman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 July 2000 15:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Need BGP4 book I am very interested in BGP4 and Multi-homing. does any know of a good book on bgp4 of one that covers bgp4 in depth. thanks. Josh ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ARP Broadcast
People seem to be missing the point. The idea behind the ARP is to allow unicast(L3 to L2 mapping) communication, otherwise you would be running a broadcast LAN. You could run a LAN using all broadcast traffic, and this has been done ;) , but of course this would bring the end nodes to their CPU knees. Hence the implmentation of the ARP protocol. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco man Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 1:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ARP Broadcast Hi All, Could any one explain why ARP needs to broadcast when looking for the MAC address. Why not send a unicast using the given IP address. Regards to all Vapian Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN problem
it's more then likely that your spids are not configured properly, not necessarily invalid. From: "NoOneYouKnow" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "NoOneYouKnow" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISDN problem Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:24:14 -0500 ""Ken Yeo"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8irilg$5v3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8irilg$5v3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... [snip] ISDN BRI0 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-5ess Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 89, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED I_Queue_Len 0, UI_Queue_Len 0 Spid Status: TEI 89, ces = 1, state = 8(established) spid1 configured, spid1 NOT sent, spid1 NOT valid TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down) spid2 configured, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid Maybe a dumb question, but could it be that your SPIDs are not valid? ---JRE--- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gre/ipsec
i'm trying a simple GRE/IPSEC scenario that i can't seem to get to work. i've built a tunnel between 2 router to pass ipx traffic, and for security i would like to encrypt the tunnel traffic. my crypto map points to an access list that allows gre traffic, but the crypto isakmp sa never builds. any ideas? Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gre/ipsec
your assumption is correct, however, that would encrypt all ip traffic when i only want to encrypt the gre traffic. what's strange is that when i do a general ACL for ip/icmp traffic it works, but when i do a ping ipx neighbor it doesn't work. i have verified through debug that a crypto-map free config allows the ipx ping using ip protocol 47, which i believe is gre. the serial interface has no ipx configured, except for a frame map ipx statement, which i probably don't need anyway. the tunnel interface has all the ipx configs. got me stumped... From: "Kenny Sallee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Kenny Sallee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "vr4drvr ." [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gre/ipsec Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 15:05:19 -0700 Why don't you do: acce 132 permit ip host 135.7.1.3 ho 135.7.1.5 log Assuming 135.7.1.3 and .5 are the tunnel source/destination? Or am I missing something? Kenny - Original Message - From: "vr4drvr ." [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 2:11 PM Subject: Re: gre/ipsec not easily. here's the deal...i can use an access list such as... acc 132 per icmp ho 135.7.1.3 ho 135.7.1.5 log on the host 135.7.1.3 pointing to 135.7.1.5, and of course the mirror image on the other side. all works fine with the pings, in that the first 5 time-out while the SA is built. after that the pings are successful. but when i use the following... acc 132 per gre ho 135.7.1.3 ho 135.7.1.5 log the ipx pings never bring up the line. shouldn't the above acl cover gre encapsulated packets? From: "Kenny Sallee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "vr4drvr ." [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gre/ipsec Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 13:59:57 -0700 Can you post your configs? Kenny - Original Message - From: "vr4drvr ." [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 11:32 AM Subject: gre/ipsec i'm trying a simple GRE/IPSEC scenario that i can't seem to get to work. i've built a tunnel between 2 router to pass ipx traffic, and for security i would like to encrypt the tunnel traffic. my crypto map points to an access list that allows gre traffic, but the crypto isakmp sa never builds. any ideas? Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: gre/ipsec
i can't physically copy them at the moment, not a security issue more of a hardware issue. essentially i have... r5-s0.1frames0-r3 (ip) as well, r5-tu100--tu100-r3 (ipx) - i have the ipx configs on the tunnel interface, running eigrp between them, and the nodes see one another. when i ping ipx without crypto it works, but when i apply crypto it doesn't-recall that when i use crypto with access-l 132 per icmp any any it encrypts pings. the crypto ACL is access-l 132 per gre any any - crypto map statements are on the serial int's this is killing me From: "Ryan Moffett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "vr4drvr ." [EMAIL PROTECTED],"Cisco Groupstudy List" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: gre/ipsec Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 17:50:32 -0400 I have done this a number of times, can you post "sanitized" versions of your configs? Ryan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of vr4drvr . Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gre/ipsec i'm trying a simple GRE/IPSEC scenario that i can't seem to get to work. i've built a tunnel between 2 router to pass ipx traffic, and for security i would like to encrypt the tunnel traffic. my crypto map points to an access list that allows gre traffic, but the crypto isakmp sa never builds. any ideas? Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dlsw again
Forgive me if you've heard this one before... Q. Given R1(1 ethernet), R2(1 tokenring and 1 ethernet), and R3(1 tokenring) configure full LAN connectivity without a border peer OR a dlsw between R1 and R3. A. My hypothesis...configure R1 and R3 to point to R2 (promiscuous), then configure translational bridging on R2. I believe that an explorer from R1 will cross to R2, then bridge across R2, only to be transmitted across the final dlsw journey. The explorer will have crossed all 4 LAN's. Is this correct? TIA. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLSW+ questions
for all the LAN interfaces to communicate with one another, without a border peer in the middle, it requires a fully meshed DLSW configuration. meaning R1 points to R2 and vice versa, R1 points to R3 and vice versa, and finally R1 points to R3 and vice versa. one way you could do this is to configure them all as promiscuous, then point to one neigbor, who then points to another nieghbor, and so on. R1R2R3 ^-| From: "Goh, Winston" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Goh, Winston" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Randall Scheffer'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],"'Michael Law'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],Gregory Schwimer [EMAIL PROTECTED], CCIE Lab [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DLSW+ questions Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 20:03:53 -0500 Hi, If R2 is configure to be a border then i would think that R1traffics would be passed to R3. cheers Winston Goh CCNP, CVE Snr Network Specialist Unisys Singapore mobile : 97469192 -Original Message- From: Randall Scheffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 7:58 AM To: 'Michael Law'; Gregory Schwimer; CCIE Lab Subject: RE: DLSW+ questions What if: dlsw peers t0__R1---fst--R2_t0 and dlsw peers e0_R2---tcp--R3_e0 Will traffic pass from Token ring on R1 through R2 to Ethernet on R3? Thanks, Randall -Original Message- From: Michael Law [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 12:17 AM To: Gregory Schwimer; CCIE Lab Subject: Re: DLSW+ questions It is said that border peer is needless. Because dlsw can act as trasparent bidge between two peers. - Original Message - From: Gregory Schwimer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Law mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; CCIE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lab Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 11:00 AM Subject: Re: DLSW+ questions If you want the two routers that are peered to R2 to be able to communicate in this manner, you must configure the common router R2 as a border peer. Whether or not LAN reachability is possible is subject to the inclusion of these interfaces in the DLSW bridge/ring groups. - Original Message - From: Michael Law mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CCIE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lab Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 5:50 PM Subject: DLSW+ questions I have three routers connect as:R1---R2---R3 R2 have dlsw peers to R1 and R3. Question 1: Can R1's Ethernet reach R3's Ethernet? Question 2: Can R1's TokenRing reach R3's TokenRing? Why or why not? What's the remedy? Thanks, Michael ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CD help
i'm trying to put together a list of valuable documents found on the Cisco CD, in order to reduce searchs and lookups to a minimum. i checked the archives and found no such list, so please submit any titles/search keywords that you feel are outstanding. TIA. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange OSPF issue
thanks for the link- it is a strange scenario, indeed. what i was actually seeing was an external ospf route on the hub being propogated to one hub, but not the other, and i configured the hubs to be identical! the spokes did form adjacencies with the hub, and all looked well until you check the routing tables. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: strange OSPF issue Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 15:48:20 EDT ...the strange thing is that the databases on the spokes don't match Possibly because the two spokes are really "stub" networks and therefore do not have network LSAs of their own. (see "Bridges, Routers and Switches for CCIEs" by Caslow, p.375) HIR, -Austin Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caslow pg 653-654
just want to verify with the group that the example for dlsw border peer configuration in Caslow pg. 653-654 is erroneous. i think it is missing remote peer statements on the border peers to the individual peers in its peer group. please verify. TIA. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
