Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Timmons

Ok, success!  Well, it turns out, we had a bad CSU.  Strange thing, though.
It worked ok on the 3Com equipment and last time we did testing, we put the
CSU on the Cisco and it didn't work.  We put it back on the 3Com and it
worked fine.  This time, we couldn't get it to work on the Cisco, tried
putting it back and it died.  We configured (yet) another CSU and up it
came.  I guess you can never try enough hardware sometimes.  Thanks for all
the input.  It's much appreciated.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32402&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are correct, the LMI is set at the interface level.
One command that I don't think has been mentioned is 'debug frame-relay 
lmi'.  It's pretty safe for a debug command - it shows you what is 
happening between your router and the frame switch.  You should see status 
enquiries and status messages every 10 seconds, and every 60 seconds a 
list of PVCs known by the switch, and their status.  The 10 sec/60sec 
might vary depending on switch type - I'm not sure.

JMcL 

- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 08:48 am -


"Bob Timmons" 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18/01/2002 06:59 am
Please respond to "Bob Timmons"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    cc: 
        Subject:    Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long)
[7:32307]


Thanks everyone for all the input... We're doing another test today at 4pm
(EST) so I'll get more info and I'll try using different lmi-types.  I 
seem
to remember trying ansi, but I'll give it another go and I'll document all
of the show frame map/pvc/etc in case it doesn't work again.  Am I correct
in assuming that the LMI is set only at the interface level and the
subinterfaces will get it from the interface?

> Bob,,
>
>
> You need to verify the LMI on the Canadian end...Cisco uses Strata
> (surprise) and Bell Canada uses Ansi or Annex A or Ddepends on where
> you are...I use to manage a network with several sites in the northland
and
> we ran into this consistently. You can have different types of LMI in 
your
> network and it runs fine.
>
> Terry Vore
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 11:22 AM 1/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32366&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Terry Vore

Well, the sub-interfaces do not need the LMI, it is only used to report the 
information about the dlci's to the interfaceactually I have turned off 
the keepalives in a lab environment and still pass traffic to a frame 
switch.keepalives =LMI for CiscoThe other thing is to be sure of the 
type of FrameRelay encapsulationCisco or RFC1490Cisco routers 
default to CiscoThis is set at the dlci level


Terry Vore



At 02:59 PM 1/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Thanks everyone for all the input... We're doing another test today at 4pm
>(EST) so I'll get more info and I'll try using different lmi-types.  I seem
>to remember trying ansi, but I'll give it another go and I'll document all
>of the show frame map/pvc/etc in case it doesn't work again.  Am I correct
>in assuming that the LMI is set only at the interface level and the
>subinterfaces will get it from the interface?
>
> > Bob,,
> >
> >
> > You need to verify the LMI on the Canadian end...Cisco uses Strata
> > (surprise) and Bell Canada uses Ansi or Annex A or Ddepends on where
> > you are...I use to manage a network with several sites in the northland
>and
> > we ran into this consistently. You can have different types of LMI in
your
> > network and it runs fine.
> >
> > Terry Vore
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 11:22 AM 1/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32356&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread John Neiberger

Yes, the LMI is set at the interface level.  However, since you're using
12.0 the router should auto-detect the LMI type. 

John

>>> "Bob Timmons"  1/17/02 12:59:25 PM >>>
Thanks everyone for all the input... We're doing another test today at
4pm
(EST) so I'll get more info and I'll try using different lmi-types.  I
seem
to remember trying ansi, but I'll give it another go and I'll document
all
of the show frame map/pvc/etc in case it doesn't work again.  Am I
correct
in assuming that the LMI is set only at the interface level and the
subinterfaces will get it from the interface?

> Bob,,
>
>
> You need to verify the LMI on the Canadian end...Cisco uses Strata
> (surprise) and Bell Canada uses Ansi or Annex A or Ddepends on
where
> you are...I use to manage a network with several sites in the
northland
and
> we ran into this consistently. You can have different types of LMI in
your
> network and it runs fine.
>
> Terry Vore
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 11:22 AM 1/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32349&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Timmons

Thanks everyone for all the input... We're doing another test today at 4pm
(EST) so I'll get more info and I'll try using different lmi-types.  I seem
to remember trying ansi, but I'll give it another go and I'll document all
of the show frame map/pvc/etc in case it doesn't work again.  Am I correct
in assuming that the LMI is set only at the interface level and the
subinterfaces will get it from the interface?

> Bob,,
>
>
> You need to verify the LMI on the Canadian end...Cisco uses Strata
> (surprise) and Bell Canada uses Ansi or Annex A or Ddepends on where
> you are...I use to manage a network with several sites in the northland
and
> we ran into this consistently. You can have different types of LMI in your
> network and it runs fine.
>
> Terry Vore
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 11:22 AM 1/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32344&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Terry Vore

Bob,,


You need to verify the LMI on the Canadian end...Cisco uses Strata 
(surprise) and Bell Canada uses Ansi or Annex A or Ddepends on where 
you are...I use to manage a network with several sites in the northland and 
we ran into this consistently. You can have different types of LMI in your 
network and it runs fine.

Terry Vore























At 11:22 AM 1/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32337&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread John Neiberger

Are you positive you have the DLCI assignments the same as in the 3COM
router you replaced?

What do 'show frame map' and 'show frame pvc' look like?  Do you have
any PVCs that are UNUSED/INACTIVE?  

On the remote side that is UP/DOWN, do you see any incoming packets at
all or does it think the interface is up simply because DTR is high? 
What does show interface show on the remote side?  Equal numbers of LMI
enquiries sent compared to stats received?

Thanks,
John

>>> "Bob Timmons"  1/17/02 10:35:42 AM >>>
On S5/1 I get UP/UP.

On S5/1.4, I get UP/UP on our side and UP/UP on the remote side.
On S5/1.3 I get Down/Down on our side and Up/Down on their side.

> What do you mean, specifically?  Does the line protocol never come
up?
> Does the line protocol come up yet OSPF adjacencies do not form? 
Does
> the physical interface even come up?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> >>> "Bob Timmons"  1/17/02 9:22:54 AM >>>
> We're switching our routers from 3Com to Cisco and we're having
> trouble at one of our sites.  We've got a hub-and-spoke
configuration
> from our central site to 4 other sites.  3 of the sites come up when
> we switch the hardware to Cisco (simply moving the CSU from the 3Com
> router to the Cisco router), the 4th does not.  I'm including the
> Central Site config and 2 of the remotes (Site 1 comes up, Site 2
does
> not).
>
> We've changed out the router (including the serial ports), csu,
serial
> cable, rj45's, everything.  It's not a hardware problem.  We changed
> the CSU on the central site, just to see if it would help.  No go.
>
> Please let me know if you see something weird.
>
> I've replaced the DLCI #'s with letters, but they match up (i.e. if
> it's ABC in site 1, it matches to ABC in central site).  I didn't
> include configs for sites 3 & 4, but they're identical with the
> exception of the DLCI's and IP's.  (and they work as well).
>
> Something I had thought about... this site is in Canada and we're in
> the US as well as the other 3 sites.  Would there be any caveats
> regarding international connections?  Again, everything works when
> connected to the 3Com equipment, it's only when we connect up the
> Cisco's that site 1 fails.
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
> Bob
>
> --
> Site 1 (This site works fine)
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> version 12.0
>
> ip subnet-zero
>
> interface Serial0/0
>  ip address x.x.53.26 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  no fair-queue
>  frame-relay interface-dlci ABC
> --
> Site 2 (This site does not come up)
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> version 12.0
>
> ip subnet-zero
>
> interface Serial0/0
>  ip address x.x.53.2 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  no fair-queue
>  frame-relay interface-dlci XYZ
> --
> Central Site
>
> Current configuration:
> version 12.0
>
> ip subnet-zero
>
> interface Serial5/1
>  no ip address
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
> !
> interface Serial5/1.1 point-to-point
>  ip address x.x.53.17 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  ipx network 92
>  frame-relay interface-dlci GHI
> !
> interface Serial5/1.2 point-to-point
>  ip address x.x.53.21 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  ipx network 54B
>  frame-relay interface-dlci DEF
> !
> interface Serial5/1.3 point-to-point
>  bandwidth 64000
>  ip address x.x.53.1 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  frame-relay interface-dlci XYZ
> !
> interface Serial5/1.4 point-to-point
>  bandwidth 64000
>  ip address x.x.53.25 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  frame-relay interface-dlci ABC
> --




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32328&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Vincent Miller

Is the last site by any chance through an NNI link ?
Have your tried frame-relay lmi-type ansi at both ends ?


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32326&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Timmons

On S5/1 I get UP/UP.

On S5/1.4, I get UP/UP on our side and UP/UP on the remote side.
On S5/1.3 I get Down/Down on our side and Up/Down on their side.

> What do you mean, specifically?  Does the line protocol never come up?
> Does the line protocol come up yet OSPF adjacencies do not form?  Does
> the physical interface even come up?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> >>> "Bob Timmons"  1/17/02 9:22:54 AM >>>
> We're switching our routers from 3Com to Cisco and we're having
> trouble at one of our sites.  We've got a hub-and-spoke configuration
> from our central site to 4 other sites.  3 of the sites come up when
> we switch the hardware to Cisco (simply moving the CSU from the 3Com
> router to the Cisco router), the 4th does not.  I'm including the
> Central Site config and 2 of the remotes (Site 1 comes up, Site 2 does
> not).
>
> We've changed out the router (including the serial ports), csu, serial
> cable, rj45's, everything.  It's not a hardware problem.  We changed
> the CSU on the central site, just to see if it would help.  No go.
>
> Please let me know if you see something weird.
>
> I've replaced the DLCI #'s with letters, but they match up (i.e. if
> it's ABC in site 1, it matches to ABC in central site).  I didn't
> include configs for sites 3 & 4, but they're identical with the
> exception of the DLCI's and IP's.  (and they work as well).
>
> Something I had thought about... this site is in Canada and we're in
> the US as well as the other 3 sites.  Would there be any caveats
> regarding international connections?  Again, everything works when
> connected to the 3Com equipment, it's only when we connect up the
> Cisco's that site 1 fails.
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
> Bob
>
> --
> Site 1 (This site works fine)
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> version 12.0
>
> ip subnet-zero
>
> interface Serial0/0
>  ip address x.x.53.26 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  no fair-queue
>  frame-relay interface-dlci ABC
> --
> Site 2 (This site does not come up)
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> version 12.0
>
> ip subnet-zero
>
> interface Serial0/0
>  ip address x.x.53.2 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  no fair-queue
>  frame-relay interface-dlci XYZ
> --
> Central Site
>
> Current configuration:
> version 12.0
>
> ip subnet-zero
>
> interface Serial5/1
>  no ip address
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
> !
> interface Serial5/1.1 point-to-point
>  ip address x.x.53.17 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  ipx network 92
>  frame-relay interface-dlci GHI
> !
> interface Serial5/1.2 point-to-point
>  ip address x.x.53.21 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  ipx network 54B
>  frame-relay interface-dlci DEF
> !
> interface Serial5/1.3 point-to-point
>  bandwidth 64000
>  ip address x.x.53.1 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  frame-relay interface-dlci XYZ
> !
> interface Serial5/1.4 point-to-point
>  bandwidth 64000
>  ip address x.x.53.25 255.255.255.252
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf dead-interval 60
>  frame-relay interface-dlci ABC
> --




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32319&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread John Neiberger

What do you mean, specifically?  Does the line protocol never come up? 
Does the line protocol come up yet OSPF adjacencies do not form?  Does
the physical interface even come up?

Thanks,
John

>>> "Bob Timmons"  1/17/02 9:22:54 AM >>>
We're switching our routers from 3Com to Cisco and we're having
trouble at one of our sites.  We've got a hub-and-spoke configuration
from our central site to 4 other sites.  3 of the sites come up when
we switch the hardware to Cisco (simply moving the CSU from the 3Com
router to the Cisco router), the 4th does not.  I'm including the
Central Site config and 2 of the remotes (Site 1 comes up, Site 2 does
not).

We've changed out the router (including the serial ports), csu, serial
cable, rj45's, everything.  It's not a hardware problem.  We changed
the CSU on the central site, just to see if it would help.  No go.

Please let me know if you see something weird.

I've replaced the DLCI #'s with letters, but they match up (i.e. if
it's ABC in site 1, it matches to ABC in central site).  I didn't
include configs for sites 3 & 4, but they're identical with the
exception of the DLCI's and IP's.  (and they work as well).

Something I had thought about... this site is in Canada and we're in
the US as well as the other 3 sites.  Would there be any caveats
regarding international connections?  Again, everything works when
connected to the 3Com equipment, it's only when we connect up the
Cisco's that site 1 fails.

Thanks for any input.

Bob

--
Site 1 (This site works fine)

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0

ip subnet-zero

interface Serial0/0
 ip address x.x.53.26 255.255.255.252
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 ip ospf dead-interval 60
 no ip mroute-cache
 no fair-queue
 frame-relay interface-dlci ABC
--
Site 2 (This site does not come up)

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0

ip subnet-zero

interface Serial0/0
 ip address x.x.53.2 255.255.255.252
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 ip ospf dead-interval 60
 no ip mroute-cache
 no fair-queue
 frame-relay interface-dlci XYZ
--
Central Site

Current configuration:
version 12.0

ip subnet-zero

interface Serial5/1
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation frame-relay
 ip ospf dead-interval 60
!
interface Serial5/1.1 point-to-point
 ip address x.x.53.17 255.255.255.252
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 ip ospf dead-interval 60
 ipx network 92
 frame-relay interface-dlci GHI
!
interface Serial5/1.2 point-to-point
 ip address x.x.53.21 255.255.255.252
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 ip ospf dead-interval 60
 ipx network 54B
 frame-relay interface-dlci DEF
!
interface Serial5/1.3 point-to-point
 bandwidth 64000
 ip address x.x.53.1 255.255.255.252
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 ip ospf dead-interval 60
 frame-relay interface-dlci XYZ
!
interface Serial5/1.4 point-to-point
 bandwidth 64000
 ip address x.x.53.25 255.255.255.252
 no ip directed-broadcast
 ip ospf network point-to-point
 ip ospf dead-interval 60
 frame-relay interface-dlci ABC
--




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32313&t=32307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]