priority queuing
Can a 1601 router with IOS 11.3 can handle priority queueing over a serial interface (frame-relay)? Thanks a million in advance! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: priority queuing
yes On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Marshal Schoener wrote: > Can a 1601 router with IOS 11.3 can handle priority queueing > over a serial interface (frame-relay)? > > Thanks a million in advance! > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Priority Queuing [7:46108]
I setup access-lists as such: access-list 101 permit ip any 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 access-list 102 permit ip any 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 then I made the priority-list: priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 101 priority-list 1 protocol ip low list 102 My question is, would this make any packet that comes into the interface (whatever interface i implemented the priority-list on) have higher priority going to host 192.168.1.1 over 192.168.1.2? Basically I'm wondering if that setup above would work. I did not actually set that scenario up but I wanted to know for my own personal knowledge if the extended access list would work like that with priority queuing :-) Thanks for the help! Jarred Nicholls, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46108&t=46108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Priority Queuing [7:46108]
Hi, I think this should work weel, But I dont think you need an extended access list for implementing this as you you want the 192.168.1.1 to be given High priority over 192.168.1.2, You are not specifying any Particular traffic from 192.168.1.1 to be given high priority. Well if you want I can do this in my Lab and tell you. Thank you Sunil ,CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46121&t=46108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Priority Queuing [7:46108]
Sunil, Yes that would be great if you could do that in your lab. I'd appreciate it. The reason I used extended access list is because I want to queue traffic for the "destination" 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.1, not the source address. And extended uses destination addresses as part of the calculation. Thanks again! Jarred Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46157&t=46108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]
Hi,all, I just finished Caslow, 2nd ed. In the chapter on queuing, he very briefly mentions a beast called "priority-queuing weighted fair queuing". The two alone, I get; however, I am unable to find any info on the Cisco site about the merger (if you can call it that) that results in "PQ-WFQ". Was Caslow smoking crack, or does have a line to Madame Cleo where he can see technologies before they are actually here? Can someone give me some links to the official Cisco PQ-WFQ pages/docs? Thanks, Charles Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1853&t=1853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I verify that priority queuing works ?
Hi all I set-up the priority queuing. How do I verify that priority queuing works on a serial interface (or on any other kind of interface ) ? Is there any IOS command for that ? Does anybody want to explain me ? Thanks in advance Cristian Piatnitchi _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]
I believe this is the concept behind LLQ, the queuing mechanism that cisco propeses in order to have strict QoS (specially with VoIP over high traffic netowrks) = Panayiotis PsihoyiosSyNET S.A. CCNP (Security, ATM), CCDP, MCP 118 B, Agias Eleoussis Street Network EngineerGR 151 25 Maroussi email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Athens - Greece Tel:++ 301 61 29 500Fax: ++ 301 61 25 313 = > -Original Message- > From: Cthulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853] > > > Hi,all, > > I just finished Caslow, 2nd ed. In the chapter on queuing, > he very briefly > mentions a beast called "priority-queuing weighted fair > queuing". The two > alone, I get; however, I am unable to find any info on the > Cisco site about > the merger (if you can call it that) that results in "PQ-WFQ". > > Was Caslow smoking crack, or does have a line to Madame Cleo > where he can > see technologies before they are actually here? > > Can someone give me some links to the official Cisco PQ-WFQ > pages/docs? > > > Thanks, > > Charles > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1857&t=1853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]
Caslow talks about LLQ by itself, and then talks about this weird PQ-WFQ thing. I am going to crack the book again tonight and reread this section. In the meantime, if anyone can point me to a link, I would be grateful... Charles ""PSIHOYIOS PANAYIOTIS"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe this is the concept behind LLQ, the queuing mechanism that cisco > propeses in order to have strict QoS (specially with VoIP over high traffic > netowrks) > > = > Panayiotis Psihoyios SyNET S.A. > CCNP (Security, ATM), CCDP, MCP 118 B, Agias Eleoussis Street > Network Engineer GR 151 25 Maroussi > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Athens - Greece > Tel:++ 301 61 29 500 Fax: ++ 301 61 25 313 > = > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cthulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:01 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853] > > > > > > Hi,all, > > > > I just finished Caslow, 2nd ed. In the chapter on queuing, > > he very briefly > > mentions a beast called "priority-queuing weighted fair > > queuing". The two > > alone, I get; however, I am unable to find any info on the > > Cisco site about > > the merger (if you can call it that) that results in "PQ-WFQ". > > > > Was Caslow smoking crack, or does have a line to Madame Cleo > > where he can > > see technologies before they are actually here? > > > > Can someone give me some links to the official Cisco PQ-WFQ > > pages/docs? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Charles > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1919&t=1853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "Priority-queuing-weighted-fair-queuing" [7:1853]
- Priority Queueing and Weighted Fair Queueing are normally very different and distinctive queue mechanisms, each with their own idiosyncrasies. As Cisco struggles to find the QoS nirvana the rules are changing. . . Low Latency Queuing via Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing, a feature that seemed to start around in 12.0.7T, combined priority with CB-WFQ. The way I understand it, when the priority keyword is used to invoke low latency queueing instead of the bandwidth keyword, the policy map class that contains the priority is dequeued first and sent over those that do not. It appears that LLQ is meant for real time streams such as video and voice, but I do not see why it could not be used with other data types just as easily. There are examples of this on CCO, try searching using low latency queueing as the search phrase. --- - --- ""Cthulu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi,all, > > I just finished Caslow, 2nd ed. In the chapter on queuing, he very briefly > mentions a beast called "priority-queuing weighted fair queuing". The two > alone, I get; however, I am unable to find any info on the Cisco site about > the merger (if you can call it that) that results in "PQ-WFQ". > > Was Caslow smoking crack, or does have a line to Madame Cleo where he can > see technologies before they are actually here? > > Can someone give me some links to the official Cisco PQ-WFQ pages/docs? > > > Thanks, > > Charles > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2033&t=1853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How do I verify that priority queuing works ?
Well you can do a quick check of your queue config with "show queuing." But to actually see the results on an active link try running "debug priority" from the console. If you're telnetting to the box don't forget to turn on "term mon" or you won't see the results from your telnet session. Aloha, Frank Piatnitchi Cristian wrote: > > Hi all > > I set-up the priority queuing. > How do I verify that priority queuing works on a serial interface (or on any > other kind of interface ) ? > Is there any IOS command for that ? > Does anybody want to explain me ? > > Thanks in advance > Cristian Piatnitchi > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
