Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-milter sending delays

2005-03-18 Thread Dan Bongert
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 06:55:47 +
Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:39:40 -0600, Dan Bongert
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  It's a pretty beefy box (though not even close to cutting-edge):
  dual PIII 1.13GHz processors, 1GB of RAM, FreeBSD 4.8. It's not
  particularly processor-bound--the load average is usually less than
  1, and top only reports 162MB of active RAM. I'm wondering if there
  might be something weird with .doc scanning (for macro viruses)?
  That wouldn't be a problem with PDFs...
 
 Well, I just turned one of the RTF documents I've got kicking around
 into a DOC, coming out at 480 KB.  That went through in ~3 seconds.
 
 I suspect the possibility of a config problem on your box?
 
 Worth checking - which milter are you using and are you using the
 clamav from the ports?

I'm using the main branch: /usr/ports/security/clamav

I was running 0.82, and just upgraded to 0.83:

X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/770

And this only seems to be a problem with this particular Word document.
Others pass through the system in a efficient and timely fashion.
Something to do with Word's equation editor maybe?

-- 
Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSCC Unix System Administrator  (608) 262-9857
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-milter sending delays

2005-03-18 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:53:55 -0600, Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 And this only seems to be a problem with this particular Word document.
 Others pass through the system in a efficient and timely fashion.
 Something to do with Word's equation editor maybe?

Dunno.  If you want to send me a copy direct I'll run it through my
system and see what comes out.  At least that way you'll know for
certain if it's something linked to the document.

-- 
 Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
  Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he 
doesn't become a monster.  Friedrich Nietzsche
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


[Clamav-users] ClamAV-milter sending delays

2005-03-17 Thread Dan Bongert
So, I've been using ClamAV quite successfully since the days of .66, 
and I've got a new problem. A user of mine is sending out a large (but 
not humongous - ~500kb) that is filled with lots of equations and other 
complicated stuff from Outlook (though 
there are problems with other mailers too).

What's happening is this: user sends email, and while the connection is 
still open, sendmail passes the message via milter to Clam, which scans 
it for viruses. A minute and a half later, Clam has decided that the 
email is virus-free,  sendmail sends a 250 Message accepted for 
delivery, and the message is sent.

However, the problem comes in because Outlook (and Squirrelmail, our 
web-based email) has timed out the SMTP connection in that minute and a 
half. This is particularly annoying with Outlook because Outlook will 
attempt to resend the already-sent email over and over.

Does this sound like my sendmail/milter setup is broken? Or is this the 
way things are supposed to work? I'm planning a transition to Postfix 
for this summer (since I'm not a Sendmail expert by any means), but if 
there's a change I can make now, that'd be even better.

Thanks!

-- 
Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSCC Unix System Administrator
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-milter sending delays

2005-03-17 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:10:28 -0600, Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So, I've been using ClamAV quite successfully since the days of .66,
 and I've got a new problem. A user of mine is sending out a large (but
 not humongous - ~500kb) that is filled with lots of equations and other 
 complicated stuff from Outlook (though
 there are problems with other mailers too).
 
 What's happening is this: user sends email, and while the connection is
 still open, sendmail passes the message via milter to Clam, which scans
 it for viruses. A minute and a half later, Clam has decided that the
 email is virus-free,  sendmail sends a 250 Message accepted for
 delivery, and the message is sent.

What sort of hardware have you got and what sort of load is it under?

On my largely idle 1 GHz box with 512 MB of RAM I see a ~550 KB PDF
file scanned (through MIMEDefang) by both ClamAV and F-Prot in about 2
seconds.  I haven't seen anything take longer than 10 seconds, even
with SpamAssassin.

-- 
 Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
  Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he 
doesn't become a monster.  Friedrich Nietzsche
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-milter sending delays

2005-03-17 Thread Dan Bongert

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:58:46 +
Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:10:28 -0600, Dan Bongert 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  So, I've been using ClamAV quite successfully since the days of .66,
  and I've got a new problem. A user of mine is sending out a large 
  (but not humongous - ~500kb) that is filled with lots of equations 
  and other complicated stuff from Outlook (though there are problems 
  with other mailers too).
  
  What's happening is this: user sends email, and while the 
  connection is still open, sendmail passes the message via milter to 
  Clam, which scans it for viruses. A minute and a half later, Clam 
  has decided that the email is virus-free,  sendmail sends a 250 
  Message accepted for delivery, and the message is sent.
 
 What sort of hardware have you got and what sort of load is it under?
 
 On my largely idle 1 GHz box with 512 MB of RAM I see a ~550 KB PDF
 file scanned (through MIMEDefang) by both ClamAV and F-Prot in about 2
 seconds.  I haven't seen anything take longer than 10 seconds, even
 with SpamAssassin.

It's a pretty beefy box (though not even close to cutting-edge): dual 
PIII 1.13GHz processors, 1GB of RAM, FreeBSD 4.8. It's not 
particularly processor-bound--the load average is usually less than 
1, and top only reports 162MB of active RAM. I'm wondering if there 
might be something weird with .doc scanning (for macro viruses)? That 
wouldn't be a problem with PDFs...

-- 
Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSCC Unix System Administrator
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-milter sending delays

2005-03-17 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:39:40 -0600, Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 It's a pretty beefy box (though not even close to cutting-edge): dual
 PIII 1.13GHz processors, 1GB of RAM, FreeBSD 4.8. It's not
 particularly processor-bound--the load average is usually less than
 1, and top only reports 162MB of active RAM. I'm wondering if there
 might be something weird with .doc scanning (for macro viruses)? That
 wouldn't be a problem with PDFs...

Well, I just turned one of the RTF documents I've got kicking around
into a DOC, coming out at 480 KB.  That went through in ~3 seconds.

I suspect the possibility of a config problem on your box?

Worth checking - which milter are you using and are you using the
clamav from the ports?

-- 
 Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
  Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he 
doesn't become a monster.  Friedrich Nietzsche
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html