Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-22 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
It took a while for the artifact distribution to come around, I initially had 
trouble pushing them from home too.

Anyways, I just updated the website too. Sending an announcement now..

Thanks,
+Vinod

On Apr 20, 2015, at 8:06 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
wrote:

 With 22 +1s (7 binding), one +0 and no -1s the vote passes.
 
 Thanks for everyone who tried the release and voted.
 
 I'll push the bits and send out an announcement.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 10, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
This is more than about bugs. In the past, incompatibilities are what bit us 
more than bugs. If we find such bad incompatibilities in 2.7.0 release, calling 
it not-stable yet (or alpha or whatever) leaves us with the ability to fix 
any incompatibilities in a final public-ready release.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 20, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Karthik Kambatla 
ka...@cloudera.commailto:ka...@cloudera.com wrote:

How about we skip this all entirely? If the HDFS issues reported aren't going 
to render the cluster unusable, we could just release 2.7.0 and mark it 
current/latest. We can move the stable tag to 2.7.1 or 2.7.2 whichever version 
deserves the bit.



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Karthik Kambatla
As I mentioned on the JIRA, I also ran into it just once. I didn't have the
time to investigate, and just wanted to see if anyone else also ran into
it. If it is a rare occurrence, I am fine with going through with the
release.

I have some naming reservations against calling 2.7.0 an alpha. I am fine
with having a 2.7.0-alpha release, followed by 2.7.0-beta and 2.7.0 GA.
Calling 2.7.0 alpha and 2.7.1 GA somehow doesn't seem right. I know we
followed that for 2.0.0, but it didn't make much sense to me or many others
I know (even outside Cloudera).

How about we skip this all entirely? If the HDFS issues reported aren't
going to render the cluster unusable, we could just release 2.7.0 and mark
it current/latest. We can move the stable tag to 2.7.1 or 2.7.2 whichever
version deserves the bit.



On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:

 Yup, missed this. Tx for bumping up.

 I did run simple MR jobs  dist-shell on my Mac. Things worked fine.

 Brahma Reddy also commented on YARN-3492 saying that he could take
 Karthik's configs and run jobs successfully. So, I moved it out to 2.7.1,
 it's likely an environment issue. Karthik, please look at the JIRA.

 Thanks
 +Vinod

 On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote:

  Hi Vinod,
 
  Could you check a comment by Karthik? Maybe you're missing it.
 
  Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster using the binary bits and ran a pi job.
  - The MR-AM got allocated, but never launched because the NM-RM didn't
 talk
  to each other. Filed YARN-3492. Was able to run jobs after restart.
 
  I believe we should at least investigate this further to see what could
  have been going on.
 
  Thanks,
  - Tsuyoshi
 
  On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org
 wrote:
  I'd like to agree with Vinod's suggestion.
 
  Thanks,
  - Tsuyoshi
 
  On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
  vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
  Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
  Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
  Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
  Thanks
  +Vinod
 
  On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org
 wrote:
 
  I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
  is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
  short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
  best,
  Colin
 
  On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
  brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
  Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along
 with Todd to get jcardar..
 
  Thanks  Regards
  Brahma Reddy Battula
  
  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
  To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
  Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
  So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need
 JCarder changes that you are waiting on.
 
  +Vinod
 
  On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
  HI Allen
 
  Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
  Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our
 first release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
  I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed
 against 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
  Thanks  Regards
  Brahma Reddy Battula
  
  From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
  To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
  Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org;
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
  Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been
 filed against RC0.
 
  On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
  The RC is available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
  The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
  As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1],
 depending on
  how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
  weeks as the stable release.
 
  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5
 days.
 
  Thanks,
  Vinod
 
  [1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Haven't heard back and we are way past the voting period, closing this now.

Here's my +1 to conclude the vote.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 20, 2015, at 10:31 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
wrote:

 Apologies for the delay in replying.
 
 It's a bit unusual because I am trying something different this time. We 
 discussed this before: http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 
 The short summary is to push more frequent releases instead of waiting for 
 making a release perfect - something that rarely works in practice.
 
 We have tried requesting downstream projects to use RC's before (for e.g. 
 while doing 2.x alphas/betas), but it didn't yield much success without 
 making explicit releases. That is why, I am pushing out 2.7.0 as alpha so 
 that downstream projects can start integrating right away and uncover issues. 
 Will immediately follow up with 2.7.1, 2.7.2 etc every 2-3 weeks from now.
 
 Does that make sense? I'll wait for your ack till  later in the evening today 
 and push the release out unless you are against this proposal.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 That's an interesting suggestion.  What's the advantage of putting
 HDFS-8070, HDFS-8163, and HDFS-8179 in 2.7.1, instead of just doing
 another RC?  We have only done one release candidate so far... seems a
 little unusual.
 
 I realize that some of this stuff came in after the voting period, but
 I would still feel slightly more comfortable just fixing it and doing
 an rc1, if that's possible in the next week or two.  The people who
 want to get the upstream release into their hands as soon as possible
 can use rc0 as-is.  Thoughts?
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 +1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.
 
 There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of 
 timestamps.
 
 1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
 failures on recently restarted systems
 2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
 start
 
 Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.
 
 
 
 
 On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Phil Su
+1 (non-binding)

- A bit late but I ran a set of rolling upgrade tests last week from 2.6.0 
Latest to 2.7.0 RC. 
- Tests covered rolling upgrade for individual components: NN, DN, NM, RM, HS- 
While rolling upgrade was in progress, several MR jobs were also running. - 
Everything worked as expected and the upgrades completed with no job failures.

Phil 



 On Sunday, April 19, 2015 1:08 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com 
wrote:
   

 Has 2.7.0 actually shipped? As in: redistributed, maven artifacts pushed out, 
etc. If so, it's very much too late to do another RC.

otherwise, maybe we should recognise that 2.7.0 isn't something we could push 
out, simply go straight to 2.7.1 and not worry about the 2.7.0 release -that 
is,  just skip the final step of publishing.

To get that 2.7.1 out in a timely manner though, it needs to have 0 changes 
other than these showstoppers; the ones which would have triggered a -1 
(binding) if they showed up during the vote

 On 18 Apr 2015, at 00:00, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 That's an interesting suggestion.  What's the advantage of putting
 HDFS-8070, HDFS-8163, and HDFS-8179 in 2.7.1, instead of just doing
 another RC?  We have only done one release candidate so far... seems a
 little unusual.
 
 I realize that some of this stuff came in after the voting period, but
 I would still feel slightly more comfortable just fixing it and doing
 an rc1, if that's possible in the next week or two.  The people who
 want to get the upstream release into their hands as soon as possible
 can use rc0 as-is.  Thoughts?
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 +1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.
 
 There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of 
 timestamps.
 
 1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
 failures on recently restarted systems
 2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
 start
 
 Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.
 
 
 
 
 On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Tx for reporting these test results, Phil!

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 20, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Phil Su phil...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:

 +1 (non-binding)
 
 - A bit late but I ran a set of rolling upgrade tests last week from 2.6.0 
 Latest to 2.7.0 RC. 
 - Tests covered rolling upgrade for individual components: NN, DN, NM, RM, 
 HS- While rolling upgrade was in progress, several MR jobs were also running. 
 - Everything worked as expected and the upgrades completed with no job 
 failures.
 
 Phil 
 
 
 
 On Sunday, April 19, 2015 1:08 PM, Steve Loughran 
 ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:
 
 
 Has 2.7.0 actually shipped? As in: redistributed, maven artifacts pushed out, 
 etc. If so, it's very much too late to do another RC.
 
 otherwise, maybe we should recognise that 2.7.0 isn't something we could push 
 out, simply go straight to 2.7.1 and not worry about the 2.7.0 release -that 
 is,  just skip the final step of publishing.
 
 To get that 2.7.1 out in a timely manner though, it needs to have 0 changes 
 other than these showstoppers; the ones which would have triggered a -1 
 (binding) if they showed up during the vote
 
 On 18 Apr 2015, at 00:00, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 That's an interesting suggestion.  What's the advantage of putting
 HDFS-8070, HDFS-8163, and HDFS-8179 in 2.7.1, instead of just doing
 another RC?  We have only done one release candidate so far... seems a
 little unusual.
 
 I realize that some of this stuff came in after the voting period, but
 I would still feel slightly more comfortable just fixing it and doing
 an rc1, if that's possible in the next week or two.  The people who
 want to get the upstream release into their hands as soon as possible
 can use rc0 as-is.  Thoughts?
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 +1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.
 
 There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of 
 timestamps.
 
 1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
 failures on recently restarted systems
 2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
 start
 
 Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.
 
 
 
 
 On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Apologies for the delay in replying.

It's a bit unusual because I am trying something different this time. We 
discussed this before: http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw

The short summary is to push more frequent releases instead of waiting for 
making a release perfect - something that rarely works in practice.

We have tried requesting downstream projects to use RC's before (for e.g. while 
doing 2.x alphas/betas), but it didn't yield much success without making 
explicit releases. That is why, I am pushing out 2.7.0 as alpha so that 
downstream projects can start integrating right away and uncover issues. Will 
immediately follow up with 2.7.1, 2.7.2 etc every 2-3 weeks from now.

Does that make sense? I'll wait for your ack till  later in the evening today 
and push the release out unless you are against this proposal.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:

 That's an interesting suggestion.  What's the advantage of putting
 HDFS-8070, HDFS-8163, and HDFS-8179 in 2.7.1, instead of just doing
 another RC?  We have only done one release candidate so far... seems a
 little unusual.
 
 I realize that some of this stuff came in after the voting period, but
 I would still feel slightly more comfortable just fixing it and doing
 an rc1, if that's possible in the next week or two.  The people who
 want to get the upstream release into their hands as soon as possible
 can use rc0 as-is.  Thoughts?
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 +1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.
 
 There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of 
 timestamps.
 
 1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
 failures on recently restarted systems
 2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
 start
 
 Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.
 
 
 
 
 On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
I was on the road, to Hadoop Summit EU, so couldn't close the release. Will do 
so later today.

I am pushing for 2.7.1, 2.7.2 etc - more agile releases.

+Vinod

On Apr 19, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:

 Has 2.7.0 actually shipped? As in: redistributed, maven artifacts pushed out, 
 etc. If so, it's very much too late to do another RC.
 
 otherwise, maybe we should recognise that 2.7.0 isn't something we could push 
 out, simply go straight to 2.7.1 and not worry about the 2.7.0 release -that 
 is,  just skip the final step of publishing.
 
 To get that 2.7.1 out in a timely manner though, it needs to have 0 changes 
 other than these showstoppers; the ones which would have triggered a -1 
 (binding) if they showed up during the vote
 
 On 18 Apr 2015, at 00:00, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 That's an interesting suggestion.  What's the advantage of putting
 HDFS-8070, HDFS-8163, and HDFS-8179 in 2.7.1, instead of just doing
 another RC?  We have only done one release candidate so far... seems a
 little unusual.
 
 I realize that some of this stuff came in after the voting period, but
 I would still feel slightly more comfortable just fixing it and doing
 an rc1, if that's possible in the next week or two.  The people who
 want to get the upstream release into their hands as soon as possible
 can use rc0 as-is.  Thoughts?
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 +1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.
 
 There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of 
 timestamps.
 
 1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
 failures on recently restarted systems
 2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
 start
 
 Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.
 
 
 
 
 On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending 
 on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 
 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 
 
 
 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-20 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Yup, missed this. Tx for bumping up.

I did run simple MR jobs  dist-shell on my Mac. Things worked fine.

Brahma Reddy also commented on YARN-3492 saying that he could take Karthik's 
configs and run jobs successfully. So, I moved it out to 2.7.1, it's likely an 
environment issue. Karthik, please look at the JIRA.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi Vinod,
 
 Could you check a comment by Karthik? Maybe you're missing it.
 
 Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster using the binary bits and ran a pi job.
 - The MR-AM got allocated, but never launched because the NM-RM didn't talk
 to each other. Filed YARN-3492. Was able to run jobs after restart.
 
 I believe we should at least investigate this further to see what could
 have been going on.
 
 Thanks,
 - Tsuyoshi
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote:
 I'd like to agree with Vinod's suggestion.
 
 Thanks,
 - Tsuyoshi
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
 vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 
 
 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-19 Thread Steve Loughran
Has 2.7.0 actually shipped? As in: redistributed, maven artifacts pushed out, 
etc. If so, it's very much too late to do another RC.

otherwise, maybe we should recognise that 2.7.0 isn't something we could push 
out, simply go straight to 2.7.1 and not worry about the 2.7.0 release -that 
is,  just skip the final step of publishing.

To get that 2.7.1 out in a timely manner though, it needs to have 0 changes 
other than these showstoppers; the ones which would have triggered a -1 
(binding) if they showed up during the vote

 On 18 Apr 2015, at 00:00, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 That's an interesting suggestion.  What's the advantage of putting
 HDFS-8070, HDFS-8163, and HDFS-8179 in 2.7.1, instead of just doing
 another RC?  We have only done one release candidate so far... seems a
 little unusual.
 
 I realize that some of this stuff came in after the voting period, but
 I would still feel slightly more comfortable just fixing it and doing
 an rc1, if that's possible in the next week or two.  The people who
 want to get the upstream release into their hands as soon as possible
 can use rc0 as-is.  Thoughts?
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 +1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.
 
 There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of 
 timestamps.
 
 1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
 failures on recently restarted systems
 2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
 start
 
 Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.
 
 
 
 
 On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:
 
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.
 
 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.
 
 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.
 
 Thanks
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:
 
 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 
 
 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-17 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.

Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.

Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel strongly 
against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the following: call 
this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line with my original 
proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:

 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 
 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-17 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Hi Vinod,

Could you check a comment by Karthik? Maybe you're missing it.

 Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster using the binary bits and ran a pi job.
 - The MR-AM got allocated, but never launched because the NM-RM didn't talk
 to each other. Filed YARN-3492. Was able to run jobs after restart.

 I believe we should at least investigate this further to see what could
 have been going on.

Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote:
 I'd like to agree with Vinod's suggestion.

 Thanks,
 - Tsuyoshi

 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
 vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.

 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.

 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line 
 with my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.

 Thanks
 +Vinod

 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:

 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.

 best,
 Colin

 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..

 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.

 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.

 +Vinod

 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:

 HI Allen

 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..

 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..


 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0




 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.

 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw





Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-17 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
I'd like to agree with Vinod's suggestion.

Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
 Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.

 Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.

 Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
 strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
 following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line with 
 my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.

 Thanks
 +Vinod

 On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:

 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.

 best,
 Colin

 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..

 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.

 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.

 +Vinod

 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:

 HI Allen

 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..

 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..


 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0




 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.

 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw





Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-17 Thread Arpit Agarwal
+1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.

There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of timestamps.

1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
failures on recently restarted systems
2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
start

Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.




On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:

Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.

Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.

Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel strongly 
against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the following: call 
this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line with my original 
proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:

 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.
 
 best,
 Colin
 
 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.
 
 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.
 
 +Vinod
 
 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 
 HI Allen
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 
 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-17 Thread Colin P. McCabe
That's an interesting suggestion.  What's the advantage of putting
HDFS-8070, HDFS-8163, and HDFS-8179 in 2.7.1, instead of just doing
another RC?  We have only done one release candidate so far... seems a
little unusual.

I realize that some of this stuff came in after the voting period, but
I would still feel slightly more comfortable just fixing it and doing
an rc1, if that's possible in the next week or two.  The people who
want to get the upstream release into their hands as soon as possible
can use rc0 as-is.  Thoughts?

best,
Colin

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com wrote:
 +1 for calling 2.7.0 an alpha.

 There are a couple of more issues related to incorrect handling of timestamps.

 1. HDFS-8163 - Using monotonicNow for block report scheduling causes test 
 failures on recently restarted systems
 2. HDFS-8179 - DFSClient#getServerDefaults returns null within 1 hour of NN 
 start

 Tagged both as blockers for 2.7.1.




 On 4/17/15, 7:12 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com 
 wrote:

Quick look tells me this is a bug that needs fixing.

Am on the road, so couldn't close the vote right after 5 days.

Seeing as this is coming up beyond the voting period, unless you feel 
strongly against it, I'd like to close the vote as a success but do the 
following: call this release an alpha for downstream consumption in line with 
my original proposal, following it up with a 2.7.1 in two weeks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Colin P. McCabe cmcc...@apache.org wrote:

 I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
 is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
 short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.

 best,
 Colin

 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with 
 Todd to get jcardar..

 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.

 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.

 +Vinod

 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:

 HI Allen

 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..

 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..


 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0




 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed 
 against RC0.

 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: 
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw





Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-16 Thread Colin P. McCabe
I would like to fix HDFS-8070, which just came to light.  The impact
is that if this isn't fixed, 2.6 clients will be unable to do
short-circuit reads against 2.7 datanodes.

best,
Colin

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula
brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:
 Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with Todd 
 to get jcardar..

 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.

 So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
 changes that you are waiting on.

 +Vinod

 On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
 brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:

 HI Allen

 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..

 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first 
 release that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to 
 support Java 7 byte code..


 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0




 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against 
 RC0.

 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw




Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Mit Desai
+1 (non-binding)
   
   - Downloaded and built the source.
   - Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and 
Wordcount.
   - Verified Signatures
   - Verified the RM UI for correctness.   

Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release.


-Mit Desai 


 On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:03 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
   

 Tx Pat. This is really interesting news!

+Vinod

On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White patwh...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:

 +1 non-binding
 Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good, no 
 regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5%  tolerance (dfsio, 
 sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale, compression, shuffle) 
 appear to have improvements. 
 
 Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while 2.7.0 
 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0, that said, the 
 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0.
 Thanks.
 
 patw
 
 
 - Forwarded Message -  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org 
 Cc: vino...@apache.org 
 Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
  Hi all,
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org 
 athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above - 
 I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending onhow it 
 goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a fewweeks as the 
 stable release.
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 Thanks, Vinod
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 
 2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw 


  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Eric Payne
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,Vinod, for the time and effort you put into creating this release.

I downloaded and built the source for 2.7.0, RC0. I started a local cluster and 
ran wordcount, sleep, and streaming jobs.

In addition, I did the following:
    o I ran a distributed shell job which tested preserving containers across 
AM restarts. I did this by setting the 
-keep_containers_across_application_attempts flag and killing the first AM once 
the containers started. I checked the results by querying the timeline server 
and comparing the start and end times of the non-AM containers against the 
start and end times of the later AM containers. This verified that the non-AM 
containers started during the first AM's run and finished after the first AM 
had been killed and after the second AM had started.

    o I enabled the preemption feature and verified that containers were 
preempted from preemptable queues and not from non-preemptable ones.
    o I ran unit tests for hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanage. All passed with 
the exception of TestFifoScheduler#testResourceOverCommit. 
    o I ran unit tests for hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager. All passed with the 
exception of TestResourceLocalizationService#testFailedDirsResourceRelease.

    o I ran unit tests for hadoop-hdfs. All passed with the exception of 
TestReplaceDatanodeOnFailure#testReplaceDatanodeOnFailure,TestBalancer#testUnknownDatanode,
 TestBPOfferService#testBasicFunctionality, and 
TestWebHdfsFileSystemContract#testGetFileBlockLocations.
  Thank you,-Eric Payne
 



  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org 
Cc: vino...@apache.org 
 Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
   
Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw

   


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.

So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
changes that you are waiting on.

+Vinod

On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:

 HI Allen 
 
 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..
 
 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first release 
 that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to support Java 7 
 byte code..
 
 
 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0
 
 
 
 
 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
 
 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against 
 RC0.
 
 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Tx Pat. This is really interesting news!

+Vinod

On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White patwh...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:

 +1 non-binding
 Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good, no 
 regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5%  tolerance (dfsio, 
 sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale, compression, shuffle) 
 appear to have improvements. 
 
 Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while 2.7.0 
 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0, that said, the 
 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0.
 Thanks.
 
 patw
 
 
 - Forwarded Message -  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
 vino...@apache.org
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org 
 Cc: vino...@apache.org 
 Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
   Hi all,
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org 
 athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above - 
 I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending onhow it 
 goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a fewweeks as the 
 stable release.
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 Thanks, Vinod
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 
 2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Chris Nauroth
+1 (binding)

- Downloaded source tarball and verified signature and checksum.
- Built from source, including native code on Linux and Windows.
- Ran a 3-node unsecured cluster.
- Tested various HDFS and YARN commands, including sample MapReduce jobs.
- Confirmed that SecondaryNameNode can take a checkpoint.
- HADOOP-9629: Tested integration with Azure storage as an alternative
FileSystem.
- HADOOP-11394/11395/11396: Built site docs and confirmed presence of
these fixes in the documentation for Hadoop Compatible File Systems.
- HDFS-7604: Confirmed presence of DataNode volume failure reporting in
web UI and metrics.
- HDFS-7879: Ran nm -g libhdfs.so and dumpbin /exports hdfs.dll to confirm
export of public API symbols in libhdfs.

Allen mentioned HDFS-8132, which reported a problem using JCarder on the
build.  Brahma, Todd and I have determined that root cause is
incompatibility of the JCarder build with Java 7 classes.  (2.7.0 is our
first release compiling as Java 7.)  This is not a problem that needs to
hold up the release.

Vinod, thank you for putting together the release.


Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/






On 4/15/15, 7:07 AM, Mit Desai mitde...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:

+1 (non-binding)
   
   - Downloaded and built the source.
   - Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and
Wordcount.
   - Verified Signatures
   - Verified the RM UI for correctness.

Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release.


-Mit Desai 


 On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:03 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
   

 Tx Pat. This is really interesting news!

+Vinod

On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White patwh...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID
wrote:

 +1 non-binding
 Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good,
no regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5%  tolerance
(dfsio, sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale,
compression, shuffle) appear to have improvements.
 
 Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while
2.7.0 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0,
that said, the 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0.
 Thanks.
 
 patw
 
 
 - Forwarded Message -  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@apache.org
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: vino...@apache.org
 Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
  Hi all,
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 The RC is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org
athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017
/
 As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and
above - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1],
depending onhow it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1
in a fewweeks as the stable release.
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 Thanks, Vinod
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up
2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw


  



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Karthik Kambatla
Thanks for putting this together, Vinod.

Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster using the binary bits and ran a pi job.
- The MR-AM got allocated, but never launched because the NM-RM didn't talk
to each other. Filed YARN-3492. Was able to run jobs after restart.

I believe we should at least investigate this further to see what could
have been going on.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Kihwal Lee kih...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
wrote:

 +1 (binding)Built the source from the tag and ran basic test on pseudo
 distributed cluster.
 Kihwal

   From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
  To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
 yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: vino...@apache.org
  Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
  Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

  The RC is available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

  Thanks,
  Vinod

  [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw






-- 
Karthik Kambatla
Software Engineer, Cloudera Inc.

http://five.sentenc.es


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Akira AJISAKA

Done. Thank you, Tsuyoshi.

On 4/15/15 14:55, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:

Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1?

Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA
ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote:

+0 (non-binding)

- Downloaded source
- Built from source
- Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster
- Read documents downloaded from binary tarball
- Looked Web UIs

I found several issues to be fixed.

- HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI Hadoop, 2014 is old

I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop 2.6.0.

- HADOOP-11835: hadoop version outputs Subversion Unknown -r Unknown
   (Also, there are some Unknown version in Web UI)
- HADOOP-11836: The content of index.html should be updated for 2.7.0.

I'm thinking this two issues are not blocker.

Regards,
Akira


On 4/15/15 11:05, Chris Nauroth wrote:


+1 (binding)

- Downloaded source tarball and verified signature and checksum.
- Built from source, including native code on Linux and Windows.
- Ran a 3-node unsecured cluster.
- Tested various HDFS and YARN commands, including sample MapReduce jobs.
- Confirmed that SecondaryNameNode can take a checkpoint.
- HADOOP-9629: Tested integration with Azure storage as an alternative
FileSystem.
- HADOOP-11394/11395/11396: Built site docs and confirmed presence of
these fixes in the documentation for Hadoop Compatible File Systems.
- HDFS-7604: Confirmed presence of DataNode volume failure reporting in
web UI and metrics.
- HDFS-7879: Ran nm -g libhdfs.so and dumpbin /exports hdfs.dll to confirm
export of public API symbols in libhdfs.

Allen mentioned HDFS-8132, which reported a problem using JCarder on the
build.  Brahma, Todd and I have determined that root cause is
incompatibility of the JCarder build with Java 7 classes.  (2.7.0 is our
first release compiling as Java 7.)  This is not a problem that needs to
hold up the release.

Vinod, thank you for putting together the release.


Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/






On 4/15/15, 7:07 AM, Mit Desai mitde...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:


+1 (non-binding)

- Downloaded and built the source.
- Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and
Wordcount.
- Verified Signatures
- Verified the RM UI for correctness.

Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release.


-Mit Desai


  On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:03 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:


Tx Pat. This is really interesting news!

+Vinod

On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White patwh...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID
wrote:


+1 non-binding
Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good,
no regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5%  tolerance
(dfsio, sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale,
compression, shuffle) appear to have improvements.

Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while
2.7.0 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0,
that said, the 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0.
Thanks.

patw


- Forwarded Message -  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@apache.org
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: vino...@apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
   Hi all,
I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
The RC is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org

athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017
/
As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and
above - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1],
depending onhow it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1
in a fewweeks as the stable release.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
Thanks, Vinod
[1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up
2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw













Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Kihwal Lee
+1 (binding)Built the source from the tag and ran basic test on pseudo 
distributed cluster.
Kihwal

  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org 
Cc: vino...@apache.org 
 Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
   
Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw

  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Akira AJISAKA

+0 (non-binding)

- Downloaded source
- Built from source
- Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster
- Read documents downloaded from binary tarball
- Looked Web UIs

I found several issues to be fixed.

- HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI Hadoop, 2014 is old

I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop 2.6.0.

- HADOOP-11835: hadoop version outputs Subversion Unknown -r Unknown
  (Also, there are some Unknown version in Web UI)
- HADOOP-11836: The content of index.html should be updated for 2.7.0.

I'm thinking this two issues are not blocker.

Regards,
Akira

On 4/15/15 11:05, Chris Nauroth wrote:

+1 (binding)

- Downloaded source tarball and verified signature and checksum.
- Built from source, including native code on Linux and Windows.
- Ran a 3-node unsecured cluster.
- Tested various HDFS and YARN commands, including sample MapReduce jobs.
- Confirmed that SecondaryNameNode can take a checkpoint.
- HADOOP-9629: Tested integration with Azure storage as an alternative
FileSystem.
- HADOOP-11394/11395/11396: Built site docs and confirmed presence of
these fixes in the documentation for Hadoop Compatible File Systems.
- HDFS-7604: Confirmed presence of DataNode volume failure reporting in
web UI and metrics.
- HDFS-7879: Ran nm -g libhdfs.so and dumpbin /exports hdfs.dll to confirm
export of public API symbols in libhdfs.

Allen mentioned HDFS-8132, which reported a problem using JCarder on the
build.  Brahma, Todd and I have determined that root cause is
incompatibility of the JCarder build with Java 7 classes.  (2.7.0 is our
first release compiling as Java 7.)  This is not a problem that needs to
hold up the release.

Vinod, thank you for putting together the release.


Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/






On 4/15/15, 7:07 AM, Mit Desai mitde...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:


+1 (non-binding)

   - Downloaded and built the source.
   - Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and
Wordcount.
   - Verified Signatures
   - Verified the RM UI for correctness.

Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release.


-Mit Desai


 On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:03 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:


Tx Pat. This is really interesting news!

+Vinod

On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White patwh...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID
wrote:


+1 non-binding
Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good,
no regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5%  tolerance
(dfsio, sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale,
compression, shuffle) appear to have improvements.

Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while
2.7.0 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0,
that said, the 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0.
Thanks.

patw


- Forwarded Message -  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@apache.org
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: vino...@apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
  Hi all,
I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
The RC is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org
athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017
/
As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and
above - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1],
depending onhow it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1
in a fewweeks as the stable release.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
Thanks, Vinod
[1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up
2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw










Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1?

Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA
ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
 +0 (non-binding)

 - Downloaded source
 - Built from source
 - Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster
 - Read documents downloaded from binary tarball
 - Looked Web UIs

 I found several issues to be fixed.

 - HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI Hadoop, 2014 is old

 I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop 2.6.0.

 - HADOOP-11835: hadoop version outputs Subversion Unknown -r Unknown
   (Also, there are some Unknown version in Web UI)
 - HADOOP-11836: The content of index.html should be updated for 2.7.0.

 I'm thinking this two issues are not blocker.

 Regards,
 Akira


 On 4/15/15 11:05, Chris Nauroth wrote:

 +1 (binding)

 - Downloaded source tarball and verified signature and checksum.
 - Built from source, including native code on Linux and Windows.
 - Ran a 3-node unsecured cluster.
 - Tested various HDFS and YARN commands, including sample MapReduce jobs.
 - Confirmed that SecondaryNameNode can take a checkpoint.
 - HADOOP-9629: Tested integration with Azure storage as an alternative
 FileSystem.
 - HADOOP-11394/11395/11396: Built site docs and confirmed presence of
 these fixes in the documentation for Hadoop Compatible File Systems.
 - HDFS-7604: Confirmed presence of DataNode volume failure reporting in
 web UI and metrics.
 - HDFS-7879: Ran nm -g libhdfs.so and dumpbin /exports hdfs.dll to confirm
 export of public API symbols in libhdfs.

 Allen mentioned HDFS-8132, which reported a problem using JCarder on the
 build.  Brahma, Todd and I have determined that root cause is
 incompatibility of the JCarder build with Java 7 classes.  (2.7.0 is our
 first release compiling as Java 7.)  This is not a problem that needs to
 hold up the release.

 Vinod, thank you for putting together the release.


 Chris Nauroth
 Hortonworks
 http://hortonworks.com/






 On 4/15/15, 7:07 AM, Mit Desai mitde...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:

 +1 (non-binding)

- Downloaded and built the source.
- Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and
 Wordcount.
- Verified Signatures
- Verified the RM UI for correctness.

 Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release.


 -Mit Desai


  On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:03 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
 vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:


 Tx Pat. This is really interesting news!

 +Vinod

 On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White patwh...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID
 wrote:

 +1 non-binding
 Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good,
 no regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5%  tolerance
 (dfsio, sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale,
 compression, shuffle) appear to have improvements.

 Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while
 2.7.0 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0,
 that said, the 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0.
 Thanks.

 patw


 - Forwarded Message -  From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
 vino...@apache.org
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
 yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: vino...@apache.org
 Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0
   Hi all,
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 The RC is available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org

 athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017
 /
 As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and
 above - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1],
 depending onhow it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1
 in a fewweeks as the stable release.
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 Thanks, Vinod
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up
 2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw








RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-15 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula
Need Jcardar changes to support java 7 Byte code..I will work along with Todd 
to get jcardar..

Thanks  Regards
Brahma Reddy Battula

From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [vino...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:29 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

Tx Brahma. Apologies for missing your offline email.

So, did you have luck with an updated JCarder? Or does that need JCarder 
changes that you are waiting on.

+Vinod

On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula 
brahmareddy.batt...@huawei.com wrote:

 HI Allen

 Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..

 Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first release 
 that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to support Java 7 
 byte code..


 I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 
 2.7.0-RC0




 Thanks  Regards
 Brahma Reddy Battula
 
 From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against 
 RC0.

 On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org 
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw




Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-14 Thread Masatake Iwasaki

+1 (non-binding)

+ verified signature and mds of source and binary tarball
+ built from source tarball
+ deployed binary tarball to 3 nodes cluster and run some 
hadoop-mapreduce-examples jobs


Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki

On 4/11/15 08:44, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

  The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
weeks as the stable release.

  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

  Thanks,
  Vinod

  [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw





Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-14 Thread Robert Kanter
+1 (non-binding)

+ verified checksum
+ Deployed binary tarball, ran some examples, clicked around in the Web UIs

thanks
- Robert

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Masatake Iwasaki 
iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote:

 +1 (non-binding)

 + verified signature and mds of source and binary tarball
 + built from source tarball
 + deployed binary tarball to 3 nodes cluster and run some
 hadoop-mapreduce-examples jobs

 Thanks,
 Masatake Iwasaki


 On 4/11/15 08:44, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

   The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~
 vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

   The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
   - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
   - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

   Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

   Thanks,
   Vinod

   [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw





Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-14 Thread Jing Zhao
+1 (binding)

downloaded the source tar ball, built it, and ran some examples and distcp
job.

Thanks,
-Jing

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Robert Kanter rkan...@cloudera.com
wrote:

 +1 (non-binding)

 + verified checksum
 + Deployed binary tarball, ran some examples, clicked around in the Web UIs

 thanks
 - Robert

 On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Masatake Iwasaki 
 iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote:

  +1 (non-binding)
 
  + verified signature and mds of source and binary tarball
  + built from source tarball
  + deployed binary tarball to 3 nodes cluster and run some
  hadoop-mapreduce-examples jobs
 
  Thanks,
  Masatake Iwasaki
 
 
  On 4/11/15 08:44, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~
  vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
  The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
  As discussed before
- This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
- I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending
 on
  how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
  weeks as the stable release.
 
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5
 days.
 
Thanks,
Vinod
 
[1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
  http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw
 
 
 



RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-14 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula
HI Allen 

Thanks for updating here [ HDFS-8132 ]..

Jcardar is tied to the Java 6 class format. Hadoop 2.7.0 is our first release 
that compiled Java 7 class files. Jcarder needs to updated to support Java 7 
byte code..


I am +1 ( non binding),, after all the regression tests passed against 2.7.0-RC0




Thanks  Regards
Brahma Reddy Battula

From: Allen Wittenauer [a...@altiscale.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:45 AM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against 
RC0.

On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-14 Thread Xuan Gong
+1 (Non-binding)

+ Built the source with Java 7 successfully
+ Deployed a single node cluster, and ran MR example jobs and DS jobs
successfully
+ RM and ATS webUI showed the apps' information correctly


Thanks

Xuan Gong

On 4/11/15, 9:30 PM, Zhijie Shen zs...@hortonworks.com wrote:

+1 (Binding)

+ Downloaded the source tarball
+ Built the source with Java 7 successfully
+ Deployed a single node insecure cluster, and ran MR example jobs and DS
jobs successfully, MR AM didn't hang
+ RM and TS webUI showed the apps' information correctly

Thanks,
Zhijie

From: Wangda Tan wheele...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:25 PM
To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

+1 (Non-binding)

Built from src, deployed a single node cluster, and tried to run some MR
jobs.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@apache.org
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

  The RC is available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending
on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5
days.

  Thanks,
  Vinod

  [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw




Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-14 Thread Allen Wittenauer


Someone should look into HDFS-8132, which appears to have been filed against 
RC0.

On Apr 11, 2015, at 1:44 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
 
 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
 
 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0
 
 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/
 
 As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.
 
 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
 
 Thanks,
 Vinod
 
 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-13 Thread Xiaoyu Yao
+1. (Non-binding)
 - Download hadoop-2.7.0-RC0-src.tar.gz and build locally.
 - Deploy a single node cluster and run some quota related hdfs/hadoop
shell commands.
 - Run sample MR jobs.
All basic tests result looks good to me.

Thanks,
Xiaoyu 
 

On 4/13/15, 5:43 AM, Junping Du j...@hortonworks.com wrote:

+1. (Non-binding)
- Download and verify the checksum on src and binary locally.
- Deploy a single node cluster and play with simple MR jobs, i.e. PI,
Terasort, etc.
All looks fine for now.

Thanks,

Junping

From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 12:44 AM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: vino...@apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-13 Thread Chen He
+1 non-binding

build from source,
deploy to a single node cluster, run wordcount, Terasort, etc.
Also run Teragen using DockerContainerExecutor, works fine.

Regards!

Chen He

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Junping Du j...@hortonworks.com wrote:

 +1. (Non-binding)
 - Download and verify the checksum on src and binary locally.
 - Deploy a single node cluster and play with simple MR jobs, i.e. PI,
 Terasort, etc.
 All looks fine for now.

 Thanks,

 Junping
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 12:44 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
 yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: vino...@apache.org
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

  The RC is available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

  Thanks,
  Vinod

  [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-13 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
+1 (non-binding)

- Verified checksums on source and binary tar ball.
- Built from source and launched single cluster.
- Checked to launch some jobs successfully.
- Killing application via RM UI.

Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Junping Du j...@hortonworks.com wrote:
 +1. (Non-binding)
 - Download and verify the checksum on src and binary locally.
 - Deploy a single node cluster and play with simple MR jobs, i.e. PI, 
 Terasort, etc.
 All looks fine for now.

 Thanks,

 Junping
 
 From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 12:44 AM
 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
 yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
 Cc: vino...@apache.org
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

  The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

  Thanks,
  Vinod

  [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw


RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-13 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
+1(non-binding)

Build from source, 
Deployed in 3 Node cluster
Verified RM HA, RM Work preserving restart and NM restart features submitting 
simple MR Jobs
And basic sanity testing is done.


Thanks  Regards
Rohith Sharma K S

-Original Message-
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [mailto:vino...@apache.org] 
Sent: 11 April 2015 05:14
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: vino...@apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on how 
it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few weeks as the 
stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0 
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-13 Thread Junping Du
+1. (Non-binding)
- Download and verify the checksum on src and binary locally.
- Deploy a single node cluster and play with simple MR jobs, i.e. PI, Terasort, 
etc.
All looks fine for now.

Thanks,

Junping

From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 12:44 AM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: vino...@apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-11 Thread Arun Murthy
+1 (binding)

Arun





On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM -0700, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
vino...@apache.orgmailto:vino...@apache.org wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-11 Thread Zhijie Shen
+1 (Binding)

+ Downloaded the source tarball
+ Built the source with Java 7 successfully
+ Deployed a single node insecure cluster, and ran MR example jobs and DS jobs 
successfully, MR AM didn't hang
+ RM and TS webUI showed the apps' information correctly

Thanks,
Zhijie

From: Wangda Tan wheele...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:25 PM
To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

+1 (Non-binding)

Built from src, deployed a single node cluster, and tried to run some MR
jobs.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

  The RC is available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

  Thanks,
  Vinod

  [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw



[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-10 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Hi all,

I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

 The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

As discussed before
 - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
 - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
weeks as the stable release.

 Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

 Thanks,
 Vinod

 [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

2015-04-10 Thread Wangda Tan
+1 (Non-binding)

Built from src, deployed a single node cluster, and tried to run some MR
jobs.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.

  The RC is available at:
 http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/

 The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0

  The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017/

 As discussed before
  - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and above
  - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], depending on
 how it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 in a few
 weeks as the stable release.

  Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.

  Thanks,
  Vinod

  [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0
 http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw