Re: Man, it's quiet here
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. new box for 'doze heads called unstable.apache.org that runs WIN > XP or something that they can log into and do for themselves It'll be a cold day in hell. ;-) -- Daniel Rall
RE: Man, it's quiet here
> "Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: > > > > So why don't you go next...with the introductions... > > who, me? heh. everyone knows me; i'm the git with the big mouth. :-/ hmm, i thought you were just the nice old man, Ken :)
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: * On 2002-10-25 at 22:53, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say: Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( indeed. i have a more-than-sneaking suspicion that an awful lot of [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses don't reach their owners. i think that's something that should be fixed, since it means they're not being notified of things sent to committers@, which by definition concern them.. so by all means the various lists should be notified of this list's existence.. and all committers who want to subscribe requested to use their @apache.org address. not only will that make it easier for the moderators to decide whether to approve subscriptions, but it should also help validate the @apache.org addresses. I would like (and I plan) to have Stefano's initial posting on the creation of the community@ list, posted another time on all the dev@, docs@ and so on lists. I also plan to add a note that every receipient should forward this message to any fellow-committers he knows of. This should ensure that every single committer is informed and gets (only if he wants) subscribed. By adding another note about the .forward-issue, we could also reach the poeple who are not aware of their @apache.org accounts and fix this right away. Indeed an automated tool would help, but my time is limited. So if anybody wants to help, please mail me and we can coordinate things. All in all we should await the final result of the open/close-vote so that we can rephrase Stefano's initial posting to the (possible) new subscription-rules. Any objections? cheers, erik
Re: Man, it's quiet here
"Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: > > >who, me? heh. everyone knows me; i'm the git with the big mouth. :-/ > > > > > With that description (remember that negativity was supposed to be left > on reorg@) they might confuse you for me ;-) oh, all right.. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: "Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: So why don't you go next...with the introductions... who, me? heh. everyone knows me; i'm the git with the big mouth. :-/ With that description (remember that negativity was supposed to be left on reorg@) they might confuse you for me ;-)
Re: Man, it's quiet here
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > This is a symptom of having certain constituency that fails the basic > UNIX literacy test. So ssh'ing to a UNIX box and creating a .forward > file is difficult. > > solution: Solution is that when a new person is voted for committership, they are invited to include their forwarding-email to the admin if they want such a thing to be done. When the account is setup, a .forward can be made by the admin via whatever script they want to use. The problem isn't that people don't know how to use it IMO, it's more that they don't know it's there. Or even just switch the system. Make the default that all new committers have a .forward made and a note is made for those happy with a unix-style command line so they can remove it. I'm very comfortable on a command line but took agesto setup a .forward because I didn't even realise I had a [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address running. Was only later I found a 400k mailbox when I logged onto cvs.apache.org and realised. Hen
Re: Man, it's quiet here
indeed. i have a more-than-sneaking suspicion that an awful lot of [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses don't reach their owners. i think that's something that should be fixed, since it means they're not being notified of things sent to committers@, which by definition concern them.. so by all means the various lists should be notified of this list's existence.. and all committers who want to subscribe requested to use their @apache.org address. not only will that make it easier for the moderators to decide whether to approve subscriptions, but it should also help validate the @apache.org addresses. This is a symptom of having certain constituency that fails the basic UNIX literacy test. So ssh'ing to a UNIX box and creating a .forward file is difficult. solution: 1. web based tool that does this - I can offer advice on how to pull this off reasonably securely but cannot contribute code to this effort due to lack of time. 2. new box for 'doze heads called unstable.apache.org that runs WIN XP or something that they can log into and do for themselves I suggest #1... others have any ideas?
Re: Man, it's quiet here
"Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: > > So why don't you go next...with the introductions... who, me? heh. everyone knows me; i'm the git with the big mouth. :-/ -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: Man, it's quiet here
* On 2002-10-25 at 22:53, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say: > > Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different > developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings > did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( indeed. i have a more-than-sneaking suspicion that an awful lot of [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses don't reach their owners. i think that's something that should be fixed, since it means they're not being notified of things sent to committers@, which by definition concern them.. so by all means the various lists should be notified of this list's existence.. and all committers who want to subscribe requested to use their @apache.org address. not only will that make it easier for the moderators to decide whether to approve subscriptions, but it should also help validate the @apache.org addresses. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: Man, it's quiet here
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 04:32 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Well, I for one am pretty amazed this thread forked back onto [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes...lets squash it with your introduction :-) I hate writing about myself. I've been around Apache on and off since March or April 1995. I built the first machine I had at home in 1976, though I started coding in 1969. I've had careers as a bass player, RF/microwave/video hardware engineer, and now, software guy. More (mostly accurate) about recent stuff can be gleaned by simply Googling for "Chuck Murcko". Use the quotes to filter out my cousin Mark, the drug designer. I use this method often when learning about people I meet on the net. 8^) Chuck
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Well, I for one am pretty amazed this thread forked back onto [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes...lets squash it with your introduction :-) Chuck - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Man, it's quiet here
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 02:25 AM, Peter Donald wrote: On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:03, David Reid wrote: I do find it fascinating to note the active participants in this discussion now. They've changed dramatically from the start of this discussion and now seem to be heavily "Jakarta" oriented while the people who started this discussion have largely left as the volume has increased and the topics slewed away from the original intent... Guess that's those time consuming politics that committers want to avoid??? There seems to be a disconnect somewhere in the written word and actions I would like to think that the people who started this discussion have assesed the situation and begun to take action. Apache is not built on talkers but on doers. Well, I for one am pretty amazed this thread forked back onto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck
Re: Man, it's quiet here
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:03, David Reid wrote: > > I do find it fascinating to note the active participants in this discussion > now. They've changed dramatically from the start of this discussion and now > seem to be heavily "Jakarta" oriented while the people who started this > discussion have largely left as the volume has increased and the topics > slewed away from the original intent... Guess that's those time consuming > politics that committers want to avoid??? There seems to be a disconnect > somewhere in the written word and actions > > I would like to think that the people who started this discussion have assesed the situation and begun to take action. Apache is not built on talkers but on doers. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *--* | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want | | to test a man's character, give him power." | | -Abraham Lincoln | *--*
Re: Man, it's quiet here
I do find it fascinating to note the active participants in this discussion now. They've changed dramatically from the start of this discussion and now seem to be heavily "Jakarta" oriented while the people who started this discussion have largely left as the volume has increased and the topics slewed away from the original intent... Guess that's those time consuming politics that committers want to avoid??? There seems to be a disconnect somewhere in the written word and actions No. The community proposal suggested shutting down the reorg list and comming here without the baggage (hint hint) and being more positive and actually trying to build a community amoung dissperate groups. The reorg list is slowing drawing to a close. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Or, most people just want to be left alone to write code. :-) Amen :) And remain committers without wanting to becoming members; they just can't stand these time-consuming "politics". why there are no politics in the sourceforge cvs repository ;-) generally no community either... ;-)
Re: Man, it's quiet here
If true, this should induce a certain conservatism of approach in those who are driving the reorg aganda. There's a silent majority out there who just getting on with the code. Peter So now we're sampling Richard Nixon ;-)
Re: Man, it's quiet here
> David Reid wrote: > >>On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote: > >> > >>> From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are > >>>subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>>Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different > >>>developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings > >>>did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( > >> > >>Or, most people just want to be left alone to write code. :-) > > > > Amen :) > > > And remain committers without wanting to becoming members; they just > can't stand these time-consuming "politics". > I do find it fascinating to note the active participants in this discussion now. They've changed dramatically from the start of this discussion and now seem to be heavily "Jakarta" oriented while the people who started this discussion have largely left as the volume has increased and the topics slewed away from the original intent... Guess that's those time consuming politics that committers want to avoid??? There seems to be a disconnect somewhere in the written word and actions
Re: Man, it's quiet here
David Reid wrote: On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote: From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( Or, most people just want to be left alone to write code. :-) Amen :) And remain committers without wanting to becoming members; they just can't stand these time-consuming "politics". -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) -
Re: Man, it's quiet here
David Reid wrote: On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote: From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( Or, most people just want to be left alone to write code. :-) Amen :) david If true, this should induce a certain conservatism of approach in those who are driving the reorg aganda. There's a silent majority out there who just getting on with the code. Peter -- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ "Lord, to whom shall we go?"
Re: Man, it's quiet here
go for it. Erik Abele wrote: From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( erik Morgan Delagrange wrote: More than a fifth of the committers already? That's pretty impressive. --- Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: No we settled down util we had more subscribers Ken, are we subscribed up yet? 124 subscribers at present. as opposed to 127 on reorg@, and 579 on committers@ total. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Man, it's quiet here
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote: > > > From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are > > subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different > > developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings > > did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( > > Or, most people just want to be left alone to write code. :-) Amen :) david
Re: Man, it's quiet here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote: From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( Or, most people just want to be left alone to write code. :-) hehe, yah, perhaps I simply missed that not everybody here has a deep interest in the ASF itself...it's a pity that I can't realize this damn fact. You should expect everybody in the ASF to want to spend time on this subject. Personally, I have stopped reading most posts to reorg. I can't read them and do my job. I don't really plan to read every message to this list either. I'm just here to lurk for a while. Ryan I agree, the reorg list was quite busy and its really not that easy to cope with this mass of mails :-) but I really will ensure, that we will not have the same discussions as on the reorg list, where everybody claimed, he was not informed personally :-( cheers, erik
Re: Man, it's quiet here
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote: > From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are > subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different > developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings > did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( Or, most people just want to be left alone to write code. :-) You should expect everybody in the ASF to want to spend time on this subject. Personally, I have stopped reading most posts to reorg. I can't read them and do my job. I don't really plan to read every message to this list either. I'm just here to lurk for a while. Ryan > > erik > > Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > More than a fifth of the committers already? That's > > pretty impressive. > > > > --- Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>"Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: > >> > >>>No we settled down util we had more > >> > >>subscribers Ken, are we > >> > >>>subscribed up yet? > >> > >>124 subscribers at present. as opposed to 127 on > >>reorg@, and > >>579 on committers@ total. > >>-- > >>#kenP-)} > >> > >>Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini > >>http://Golux.Com/coar/ > >>Author, developer, opinionist > >>http://Apache-Server.Com/ > >> > >>"Millennium hand and shrimp!" > >> > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ___ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 ---
Re: Man, it's quiet here
From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings did not really reach all the committers out there ;-( erik Morgan Delagrange wrote: More than a fifth of the committers already? That's pretty impressive. --- Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: No we settled down util we had more subscribers Ken, are we subscribed up yet? 124 subscribers at present. as opposed to 127 on reorg@, and 579 on committers@ total. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: Man, it's quiet here
More than a fifth of the committers already? That's pretty impressive. --- Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: > > > > No we settled down util we had more > subscribers Ken, are we > > subscribed up yet? > > 124 subscribers at present. as opposed to 127 on > reorg@, and > 579 on committers@ total. > -- > #ken P-)} > > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini > http://Golux.Com/coar/ > Author, developer, opinionist > http://Apache-Server.Com/ > > "Millennium hand and shrimp!" > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: "Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: No we settled down util we had more subscribers Ken, are we subscribed up yet? 124 subscribers at present. as opposed to 127 on reorg@, and 579 on committers@ total. So why don't you go next...with the introductions...
Re: Man, it's quiet here
"Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: > > No we settled down util we had more subscribers Ken, are we > subscribed up yet? 124 subscribers at present. as opposed to 127 on reorg@, and 579 on committers@ total. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: Man, it's quiet here
So lets continue with the introductions. I've already had some great conversations from mine.. Lets hear it. Morgan Delagrange wrote: Unless you're specifically interested in an archive-like format, I think we're still discussing most of the big issues. You might be able to just jump in and catch much of the gist. --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there an archive for reorg? 10/25/2002 5:23:09 PM, Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All the action is still on reorg. Too much action, it's cutting into my productivity big time. - Morgan --- Chuck Murcko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named it revolution@, or cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a tweaker. 8^) I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It would be a Bad Sign if it didn't. Chuck -- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ -- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Unless you're specifically interested in an archive-like format, I think we're still discussing most of the big issues. You might be able to just jump in and catch much of the gist. --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an archive for reorg? > > 10/25/2002 5:23:09 PM, Morgan Delagrange > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >All the action is still on reorg. Too much action, > >it's cutting into my productivity big time. > > > >- Morgan > > > >--- Chuck Murcko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. > >> > >> I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had > named > >> it revolution@, or > >> cagematch@, or something. But that's just me > being a > >> tweaker. 8^) > >> > >> I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. > It > >> would be a Bad Sign > >> if it didn't. > >> > >> Chuck > >> > >> > >> > >-- > --- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > >= > >Morgan Delagrange > >http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs > >http://jakarta.apache.org/commons > >http://axion.tigris.org > >http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog > > > >__ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site > >http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ > > > >-- > --- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
RE: Man, it's quiet here
I gave up on the other lists.. I just couldn't get to programming anymore.. I stated my view on communities over here and I'll stick to that ;) (called a "swami" perspective on communities", which I expected to get things going here too ;) Mvgr, Martin > -Original Message- > From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 23:35 > To: community@apache.org > Subject: Re: Man, it's quiet here > > > You say it like that's a bad thing?? :) > > david > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Murcko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:21 PM > Subject: Man, it's quiet here > > > > Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. > > > > I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named it revolution@, or > > cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a tweaker. 8^) > > > > I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It would be a Bad Sign > > if it didn't. > > > > Chuck > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Man, it's quiet here
not a web archive. Just the nasty (no so)ezmlm interface. Ted Husted wrote: Is there an archive for reorg? 10/25/2002 5:23:09 PM, Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All the action is still on reorg. Too much action, it's cutting into my productivity big time. - Morgan --- Chuck Murcko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named it revolution@, or cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a tweaker. 8^) I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It would be a Bad Sign if it didn't. Chuck -- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ -- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Is there an archive for reorg? 10/25/2002 5:23:09 PM, Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >All the action is still on reorg. Too much action, >it's cutting into my productivity big time. > >- Morgan > >--- Chuck Murcko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. >> >> I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named >> it revolution@, or >> cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a >> tweaker. 8^) >> >> I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It >> would be a Bad Sign >> if it didn't. >> >> Chuck >> >> >> >-- --- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >= >Morgan Delagrange >http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs >http://jakarta.apache.org/commons >http://axion.tigris.org >http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog > >__ >Do you Yahoo!? >Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site >http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ > >-- --- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Man, it's quiet here
You say it like that's a bad thing?? :) david - Original Message - From: "Chuck Murcko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:21 PM Subject: Man, it's quiet here > Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. > > I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named it revolution@, or > cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a tweaker. 8^) > > I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It would be a Bad Sign > if it didn't. > > Chuck > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Man, it's quiet here
All the action is still on reorg. Too much action, it's cutting into my productivity big time. - Morgan --- Chuck Murcko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. > > I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named > it revolution@, or > cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a > tweaker. 8^) > > I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It > would be a Bad Sign > if it didn't. > > Chuck > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > = Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
Re: Man, it's quiet here
Chuck Murcko wrote: Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named it revolution@, or cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a tweaker. 8^) I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It would be a Bad Sign if it didn't. Chuck - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No we settled down util we had more subscribers Ken, are we subscribed up yet?
Man, it's quiet here
Maybe I hadn't failed to subscribe after all. I suppose there'd be a better draw if we had named it revolution@, or cagematch@, or something. But that's just me being a tweaker. 8^) I sure do hope it perks up around here, though. It would be a Bad Sign if it didn't. Chuck
