Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC1

2012-05-19 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
I verified all the signatures with success.
I tried to use the binary distribution.
I tried to build the project from the source distribution with success.

So I think that it's ok for me.

+1 from me

Piergiorgio

2012/5/18 Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC1/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

 RC1 includes revising the pom.xml versions.
 I've already checked signatures.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe

 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com




Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC1

2012-05-18 Thread Karl Wright
I unpacked the bin and gave it a hand test.  Looks good.
+1

Karl

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC1/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

 RC1 includes revising the pom.xml versions.
 I've already checked signatures.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-473) We need to separate our site into two pieces: One for the ManifoldCF project, and one for each release

2012-05-17 Thread Karl Wright (JIRA)
Karl Wright created CONNECTORS-473:
--

 Summary: We need to separate our site into two pieces: One for the 
ManifoldCF project, and one for each release
 Key: CONNECTORS-473
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-473
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Build, Documentation
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.6
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6


Part of the ManifoldCF site has to do with the ManifoldCF project, and part of 
it is germane to a given release.  We should separate these so that the 
project-related part builds separately, under site/trunk, and references one 
(or more) release-related sites, under branches/XXX/site.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0

2012-05-17 Thread Karl Wright
I see two problems.

First, the outer level names are correct
(apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect
(apache-manifoldcf-0.5).  This is odd because the build.xml has this
line:

target name=set-version
  property name=release-version value=0.5.1/
/target

so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with
an old version of build.xml.

The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also.
They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5.  I'll take care of that.

Karl

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks!
 I'll have a look in the morning...
 Karl

 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

 I've already checked signatures,
 run example and run ant test-dr test-hs.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0

2012-05-17 Thread Karl Wright
ok - I'm done with the maven work.  Abe-san, can you check to be sure
that the release branch builds with the proper prefixes before tagging
again?

Thanks!
Karl


On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 I see two problems.

 First, the outer level names are correct
 (apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect
 (apache-manifoldcf-0.5).  This is odd because the build.xml has this
 line:

    target name=set-version
      property name=release-version value=0.5.1/
    /target

 so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with
 an old version of build.xml.

 The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also.
 They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5.  I'll take care of that.

 Karl

 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks!
 I'll have a look in the morning...
 Karl

 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

 I've already checked signatures,
 run example and run ant test-dr test-hs.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0

2012-05-17 Thread Shinichiro Abe
What is the prefix inside? 
I ' m not sure where prefixes is.
Where do I check? the source code or jar file?

Thank you for modifying the pom.xml.

Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/05/18, at 7:13, Karl Wright wrote:

 ok - I'm done with the maven work.  Abe-san, can you check to be sure
 that the release branch builds with the proper prefixes before tagging
 again?
 
 Thanks!
 Karl
 
 
 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 I see two problems.
 
 First, the outer level names are correct
 (apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect
 (apache-manifoldcf-0.5).  This is odd because the build.xml has this
 line:
 
target name=set-version
  property name=release-version value=0.5.1/
/target
 
 so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with
 an old version of build.xml.
 
 The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also.
 They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5.  I'll take care of that.
 
 Karl
 
 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks!
 I'll have a look in the morning...
 Karl
 
 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags
 
 I've already checked signatures,
 run example and run ant test-dr test-hs.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0

2012-05-17 Thread Karl Wright
If you open up the zip or tar, the top-level directory is
apache-manifoldcf-0.5.  That directory is set in build.xml when the
zip or tar is built:

  zip destfile=apache-manifoldcf-${release-version}-src.zip
update=false
zipfileset dir=. prefix=apache-manifoldcf-${release-version}

So, ${release-version} must have been incorrect.  But it is correct
now on the branch:

target name=set-version
  property name=release-version value=0.5.1/
/target

So somehow you must have built the artifacts from a version of the
branch before you checked in the release-version change.

Karl

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is the prefix inside?
 I ' m not sure where prefixes is.
 Where do I check? the source code or jar file?

 Thank you for modifying the pom.xml.

 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/05/18, at 7:13, Karl Wright wrote:

 ok - I'm done with the maven work.  Abe-san, can you check to be sure
 that the release branch builds with the proper prefixes before tagging
 again?

 Thanks!
 Karl


 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 I see two problems.

 First, the outer level names are correct
 (apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect
 (apache-manifoldcf-0.5).  This is odd because the build.xml has this
 line:

    target name=set-version
      property name=release-version value=0.5.1/
    /target

 so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with
 an old version of build.xml.

 The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also.
 They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5.  I'll take care of that.

 Karl

 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks!
 I'll have a look in the morning...
 Karl

 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

 I've already checked signatures,
 run example and run ant test-dr test-hs.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC1

2012-05-17 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi, 

You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC1/
and there is also a tag in svn under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

RC1 includes revising the pom.xml versions.
I've already checked signatures.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe


[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0

2012-05-16 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi, 

You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/
and there is also a tag in svn under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

I've already checked signatures,
run example and run ant test-dr test-hs.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0

2012-05-16 Thread Karl Wright
Thanks!
I'll have a look in the morning...
Karl

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags

 I've already checked signatures,
 run example and run ant test-dr test-hs.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-13 Thread Karl Wright
Feel free to generate an RC0 for 0.5.1 any time; I think all the
correct tickets have been pulled up into the branch already.

Thanks!
Karl

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes we do.  Would you be willing to do that?

 Thanks!
 Karl

 On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Okay.
 Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch?

 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote:

 Hi Abe-san,

 For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as
 the main release.  So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating
 branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags.

 Thanks,
 Karl


 On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week.
 Please create 0.5.1 branch.

 Regards,
 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote:

 It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three
 tickets into the 0.5 release branch:

 CONNECTORS-453
 CONNECTORS-467
 CONNECTORS-471

 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we
 shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated.

 The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating.
 Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this?

 Karl

 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no 
 wrote:

 If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me.

 This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably
 other web containers as well.

 Erlend


 On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote:

 My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and
 too much of a pain before then.  If we succeed in graduating in May,
 I'd give a +1.  If not, then maybe we should just try to release the
 0.6 version instead.

 Karl

 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org  wrote:

 I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable
 compatibility for Tomcat 7.x.

 +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version

 Piergiorgio

 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com

 We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over
 CONNECTORS-467.  Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to
 fix this one issue?  Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door
 early?

 Karl

 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com




 --
 Erlend Garåsen
 Center for Information Technology Services
 University of Oslo
 P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
 Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 
 31050




Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three
tickets into the 0.5 release branch:

CONNECTORS-453
CONNECTORS-467
CONNECTORS-471

I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we
shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated.

The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating.
Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this?

Karl

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote:

 If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me.

 This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably
 other web containers as well.

 Erlend


 On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote:

 My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and
 too much of a pain before then.  If we succeed in graduating in May,
 I'd give a +1.  If not, then maybe we should just try to release the
 0.6 version instead.

 Karl

 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org  wrote:

 I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable
 compatibility for Tomcat 7.x.

 +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version

 Piergiorgio

 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com

 We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over
 CONNECTORS-467.  Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to
 fix this one issue?  Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door
 early?

 Karl

 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com




 --
 Erlend Garåsen
 Center for Information Technology Services
 University of Oslo
 P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
 Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050


Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week.
Please create 0.5.1 branch.

Regards,
Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote:

 It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three
 tickets into the 0.5 release branch:
 
 CONNECTORS-453
 CONNECTORS-467
 CONNECTORS-471
 
 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we
 shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated.
 
 The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating.
 Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this?
 
 Karl
 
 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no 
 wrote:
 
 If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me.
 
 This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably
 other web containers as well.
 
 Erlend
 
 
 On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote:
 
 My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and
 too much of a pain before then.  If we succeed in graduating in May,
 I'd give a +1.  If not, then maybe we should just try to release the
 0.6 version instead.
 
 Karl
 
 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org  wrote:
 
 I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable
 compatibility for Tomcat 7.x.
 
 +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version
 
 Piergiorgio
 
 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com
 
 We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over
 CONNECTORS-467.  Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to
 fix this one issue?  Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door
 early?
 
 Karl
 
 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com
 
 
 
 
 --
 Erlend Garåsen
 Center for Information Technology Services
 University of Oslo
 P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
 Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050



Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
Hi Abe-san,

For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as
the main release.  So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating
branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags.

Thanks,
Karl


On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week.
 Please create 0.5.1 branch.

 Regards,
 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote:

 It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three
 tickets into the 0.5 release branch:

 CONNECTORS-453
 CONNECTORS-467
 CONNECTORS-471

 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we
 shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated.

 The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating.
 Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this?

 Karl

 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no 
 wrote:

 If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me.

 This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably
 other web containers as well.

 Erlend


 On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote:

 My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and
 too much of a pain before then.  If we succeed in graduating in May,
 I'd give a +1.  If not, then maybe we should just try to release the
 0.6 version instead.

 Karl

 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org  wrote:

 I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable
 compatibility for Tomcat 7.x.

 +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version

 Piergiorgio

 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com

 We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over
 CONNECTORS-467.  Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to
 fix this one issue?  Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door
 early?

 Karl

 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com




 --
 Erlend Garåsen
 Center for Information Technology Services
 University of Oslo
 P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
 Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050



Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Okay.
Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch?

Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote:

 Hi Abe-san,
 
 For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as
 the main release.  So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating
 branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags.
 
 Thanks,
 Karl
 
 
 On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week.
 Please create 0.5.1 branch.
 
 Regards,
 Shinichiro Abe
 
 On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote:
 
 It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three
 tickets into the 0.5 release branch:
 
 CONNECTORS-453
 CONNECTORS-467
 CONNECTORS-471
 
 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we
 shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated.
 
 The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating.
 Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this?
 
 Karl
 
 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no 
 wrote:
 
 If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me.
 
 This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably
 other web containers as well.
 
 Erlend
 
 
 On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote:
 
 My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and
 too much of a pain before then.  If we succeed in graduating in May,
 I'd give a +1.  If not, then maybe we should just try to release the
 0.6 version instead.
 
 Karl
 
 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org  wrote:
 
 I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable
 compatibility for Tomcat 7.x.
 
 +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version
 
 Piergiorgio
 
 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com
 
 We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over
 CONNECTORS-467.  Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to
 fix this one issue?  Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door
 early?
 
 Karl
 
 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com
 
 
 
 
 --
 Erlend Garåsen
 Center for Information Technology Services
 University of Oslo
 P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
 Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
 



Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-12 Thread Karl Wright
Yes we do.  Would you be willing to do that?

Thanks!
Karl

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Okay.
 Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch?

 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote:

 Hi Abe-san,

 For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as
 the main release.  So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating
 branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags.

 Thanks,
 Karl


 On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week.
 Please create 0.5.1 branch.

 Regards,
 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote:

 It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three
 tickets into the 0.5 release branch:

 CONNECTORS-453
 CONNECTORS-467
 CONNECTORS-471

 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we
 shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated.

 The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating.
 Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this?

 Karl

 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no 
 wrote:

 If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me.

 This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably
 other web containers as well.

 Erlend


 On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote:

 My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and
 too much of a pain before then.  If we succeed in graduating in May,
 I'd give a +1.  If not, then maybe we should just try to release the
 0.6 version instead.

 Karl

 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org  wrote:

 I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable
 compatibility for Tomcat 7.x.

 +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version

 Piergiorgio

 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com

 We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over
 CONNECTORS-467.  Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to
 fix this one issue?  Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door
 early?

 Karl

 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com




 --
 Erlend Garåsen
 Center for Information Technology Services
 University of Oslo
 P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
 Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 
 31050




Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?

2012-05-04 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable
compatibility for Tomcat 7.x.

+1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version

Piergiorgio

2012/5/1 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com

 We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over
 CONNECTORS-467.  Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to
 fix this one issue?  Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door
 early?

 Karl

 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com




[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-463) Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 0.5-incubating release

2012-04-20 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Created) (JIRA)
Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 
0.5-incubating release
-

 Key: CONNECTORS-463
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-463
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Site
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Piergiorgio Lucidi
Assignee: Piergiorgio Lucidi
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6


We need to update the site in order to guide developers to correctly build the 
project using Maven.
Due to the latest changes during the 0.5-incubating release, we released the 
source package with a problem with the Maven build.

So, before running mvn clean install, it is needed to run the following command:
{code}
mvn install:install-file -Dfile=lib/commons-httpclient.jar 
-DgroupId=commons-httpclient -DartifactId=commons-httpclient-mcf -Dversion=3.1  
-Dpackaging=jar
{code}

The execution of the command above fixes the issue on the source code of the 
0.5-incubating release.
I tested the command using an empty Maven repository.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-463) Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 0.5-incubating release

2012-04-20 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Piergiorgio Lucidi resolved CONNECTORS-463.
---

Resolution: Fixed

r1328455.

 Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 
 0.5-incubating release
 -

 Key: CONNECTORS-463
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-463
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Site
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Piergiorgio Lucidi
Assignee: Piergiorgio Lucidi
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6

   Original Estimate: 1h
  Remaining Estimate: 1h

 We need to update the site in order to guide developers to correctly build 
 the project using Maven.
 Due to the latest changes during the 0.5-incubating release, we released the 
 source package with a problem with the Maven build.
 So, before running mvn clean install, it is needed to run the following 
 command:
 {code}
 mvn install:install-file -Dfile=lib/commons-httpclient.jar 
 -DgroupId=commons-httpclient -DartifactId=commons-httpclient-mcf 
 -Dversion=3.1  -Dpackaging=jar
 {code}
 The execution of the command above fixes the issue on the source code of the 
 0.5-incubating release.
 I tested the command using an empty Maven repository.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-438) Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the mirror - the rest should point to the archive

2012-04-16 Thread Karl Wright (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Karl Wright resolved CONNECTORS-438.


Resolution: Fixed

Resolved as part of another commit


 Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the 
 mirror - the rest should point to the archive
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-438
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-438
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.6
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6


 The download page should refer to only the current release via the mirror.  
 All older releases should refer to http://archive.apache.org/dist.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[RESULT][VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-16 Thread Karl Wright
Looks like there's no problem with going ahead with this.  The ticket
is CONNECTORS-459, and I've created a corresponding branch to work on
the ticket.

Karl

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote:

 +1

 Erlend


 On 11.04.12 02.39, Karl Wright wrote:

 Folks,

 When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
 binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we
 are still using jdk 1.5.  I'd like to get a sense from the community
 whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
 next release.  The pros of such a move include allowing us to
 upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7
 components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds.  I cannot at this time
 identify any obvious cons.  Please let me know your opinion.  +1 to
 upgrade, from me.

 Thanks,
 Karl



 --
 Erlend Garåsen
 Center for Information Technology Services
 University of Oslo
 P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
 Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050


Re: [VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-11 Thread Tommaso Teofili
big +1.
Tommaso

2012/4/11 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com

 Folks,

 When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
 binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we
 are still using jdk 1.5.  I'd like to get a sense from the community
 whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
 next release.  The pros of such a move include allowing us to
 upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7
 components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds.  I cannot at this time
 identify any obvious cons.  Please let me know your opinion.  +1 to
 upgrade, from me.

 Thanks,
 Karl



Re: [VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-11 Thread Erlend Garåsen


+1

Erlend

On 11.04.12 02.39, Karl Wright wrote:

Folks,

When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we
are still using jdk 1.5.  I'd like to get a sense from the community
whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
next release.  The pros of such a move include allowing us to
upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7
components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds.  I cannot at this time
identify any obvious cons.  Please let me know your opinion.  +1 to
upgrade, from me.

Thanks,
Karl



--
Erlend Garåsen
Center for Information Technology Services
University of Oslo
P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050


[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

2012-04-11 Thread Shinichiro Abe
72 hours.  Vote passes!

Next, I need to open a vote in gene...@incubator.apache.org

Thank you everyone.
Shinichiro Abe




Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

2012-04-10 Thread Karl Wright
FWIW, I think the problem was specific to the Mac, or more precisely
the Mac's JVM and how it handles resources, which is why my attempts
to reproduce it here failed.

Karl

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
piergior...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi Karl,

 yes, now that issue is resolved. It works correctly on Google Chrome using
 it_IT locale.

 Piergiorgio

 Il giorno 10 aprile 2012 14:46, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto:

 Hi Piergiorgio,
 Did the i18n issues seem to get resolved for you with this RC?
 Karl

 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org wrote:
  Tried the example using a job with CMIS as repository connection and
  ElasticSearch as output connection.
 
  +1 from me
 
  Piergiorgio
 
  Il giorno 09 aprile 2012 03:04, Shinichiro Abe
  shinichiro.ab...@gmail.comha scritto:
 
  You can download the release candidate from
 
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/
  and there is also a tag in svn under
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
  I've checked the signatures and ran example.
 
  Thank you,
  Shinichiro Abe
 
  --
  Piergiorgio Lucidi
  http://www.open4dev.com
 
 

 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com




Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

2012-04-10 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

+1 to release

BR,

Jukka Zitting


[VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release

2012-04-10 Thread Karl Wright
Folks,

When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our
binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we
are still using jdk 1.5.  I'd like to get a sense from the community
whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our
next release.  The pros of such a move include allowing us to
upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7
components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds.  I cannot at this time
identify any obvious cons.  Please let me know your opinion.  +1 to
upgrade, from me.

Thanks,
Karl


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

2012-04-09 Thread Alex Ott
I downloaded {bin,lib,src}.zip and chekced md5 checksums - everything ok
Binary from example directory works fine, localization issue is
fixed... But README.txt still mentions 'dist/example' instead of
'example'

+1 for release

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 I've checked the signatures and ran example.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

2012-04-09 Thread Karl Wright
The README fix was not pulled up because we're only pulling up
critical fixes at this time.  However, if the incubator requires
another significant change, as I suspect they will, then I think we'll
pull up a lot of less-critical fixes while we're at it.

Thanks,
Karl

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 I downloaded {bin,lib,src}.zip and chekced md5 checksums - everything ok
 Binary from example directory works fine, localization issue is
 fixed... But README.txt still mentions 'dist/example' instead of
 'example'

 +1 for release

 On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 I've checked the signatures and ran example.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott


[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-08 Thread Shinichiro Abe
 welcome given
 the bizarre nature of the issue.
 
 Karl
 
 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything 
 is correct
 
 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory
 
 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text
 
 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe
 
 
 
 --
 With best wishes,Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott
 
 
 
 --
 With best wishes,Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott
 
 
 
 --
 With best wishes,Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott
 
 
 
 -- 
 With best wishes,Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

2012-04-08 Thread Shinichiro Abe
You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/
and there is also a tag in svn under 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

I've checked the signatures and ran example.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

2012-04-08 Thread Karl Wright
+1 from me.

Karl


On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 I've checked the signatures and ran example.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Alex Ott
I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct

There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Karl Wright
Hi Alex,

What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized
translation.  If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's
supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text.  If
it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead.

The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been
impossible for me to reproduce.  I've been using an add-on in Firefox
which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter
what locale I select.  However, in Italy apparently the same thing
happened on one machine as is now happening for you.  We presumed that
the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting
the problem, apparently incorrectly.

The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a
problem and the others are OK.  The code, though, for rendering all
the fields is, however, identical.

Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given
the bizarre nature of the issue.

Karl

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct

 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Karl Wright
If you want to experiment a bit, have a look at the file
listconnections.jsp (in framework/crawler-ui/src/webapp).  The line in
question is line 78.  Perhaps if you change the line to also output
the locale itself we might learn something.

Karl

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Alex,

 What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized
 translation.  If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's
 supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text.  If
 it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead.

 The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been
 impossible for me to reproduce.  I've been using an add-on in Firefox
 which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter
 what locale I select.  However, in Italy apparently the same thing
 happened on one machine as is now happening for you.  We presumed that
 the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting
 the problem, apparently incorrectly.

 The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a
 problem and the others are OK.  The code, though, for rendering all
 the fields is, however, identical.

 Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given
 the bizarre nature of the issue.

 Karl

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is 
 correct

 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Karl Wright
I've created CONNECTORS-457 to track this issue.  If we can figure out
what's actually happening we may decide to spin yet another RC to fix
the problem.

Karl

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 If you want to experiment a bit, have a look at the file
 listconnections.jsp (in framework/crawler-ui/src/webapp).  The line in
 question is line 78.  Perhaps if you change the line to also output
 the locale itself we might learn something.

 Karl

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Alex,

 What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized
 translation.  If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's
 supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text.  If
 it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead.

 The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been
 impossible for me to reproduce.  I've been using an add-on in Firefox
 which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter
 what locale I select.  However, in Italy apparently the same thing
 happened on one machine as is now happening for you.  We presumed that
 the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting
 the problem, apparently incorrectly.

 The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a
 problem and the others are OK.  The code, though, for rendering all
 the fields is, however, identical.

 Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given
 the bizarre nature of the issue.

 Karl

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is 
 correct

 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Alex Ott
Hi Karl

Ok, I'll try to reproduce this using code from repository...

I'm using following locale on my machine (Mac OS X 10.6.8):

LANG=C
LC_COLLATE=ru_RU.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES=C
LC_MONETARY=ru_RU.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=C
LC_TIME=ru_RU.UTF-8
LC_ALL=

And here is example of request from my browser:

GET /~ott/ HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language:
en-GB,en,ru-RU,ru;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.9,de-DE;q=0.9,de;q=0.9,en-gb;q=0.8,fr-FR;q=0.8,fr;q=0.8,it-IT;q=0.8,it;q=0.7,hu-HU;q=0.7,hu;q=0.7,en-us;q=0.7,en-ww;q=0.7,nl-NL;q=0.6,nl;q=0.6,en-ca;q=0.6,zh-CN;q=0.6,zh;q=0.5,EN-US;q=0.5,EN;q=0.5,en-US.UTF-8;q=0.5,uk-UA;q=0.4,uk;q=0.4,in-ID;q=0.4,in;q=0.4,cs-CZ;q=0.3,cs;q=0.3,en-en;q=0.3,ja-JP;q=0.3,ja;q=0.3,he-IL;q=0.2,he;q=0.2,en-GB.UTF-8;q=0.2,fi-FI;q=0.2,fi;q=0.1,en-US-ORACLE9I;q=0.1,en-s;q=0.1,en-ws;q=0.1,en-AU;q=0.0,en;q=0.0
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Connection: keep-alive

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Alex,

 What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized
 translation.  If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's
 supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text.  If
 it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead.

 The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been
 impossible for me to reproduce.  I've been using an add-on in Firefox
 which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter
 what locale I select.  However, in Italy apparently the same thing
 happened on one machine as is now happening for you.  We presumed that
 the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting
 the problem, apparently incorrectly.

 The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a
 problem and the others are OK.  The code, though, for rendering all
 the fields is, however, identical.

 Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given
 the bizarre nature of the issue.

 Karl

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is 
 correct

 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Karl Wright
You happen to be using the very same java version as the other person
who is having trouble.

I'll have a look at the logs.

Karl

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 I see following errors:

 ERROR 2012-04-06 12:57:26,822 (1407601211@qtp-1238538872-2) - Missing
 resource 'listoutputs.DeleteOutputConnection' in bundle
 'org.apache.manifoldcf.ui.i18n.common' for locale 'en_GB'
 java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find resource for bundle
 java.util.PropertyResourceBundle, key
 listoutputs.DeleteOutputConnection
        at java.util.ResourceBundle.getObject(ResourceBundle.java:374)
        at java.util.ResourceBundle.getString(ResourceBundle.java:334)
        at 
 org.apache.manifoldcf.core.i18n.Messages.getMessage(Messages.java:180)
        at 
 org.apache.manifoldcf.core.i18n.Messages.getString(Messages.java:195)
        at org.apache.manifoldcf.ui.i18n.Messages.getString(Messages.java:98)
        at org.apache.manifoldcf.ui.i18n.Messages.getString(Messages.java:46)
        at org.apache.jsp.listoutputs_jsp._jspService(listoutputs_jsp.java:257)
        at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:70)
        at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
        at 
 org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:388)

 and for other resources... Full log is at
 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1796900/manifoldcf.log.gz

 Regarding Java version - I updated yesterday, and now I have:

 ott@flash:example/logs\java -version
 Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8
 java version 1.6.0_31
 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_31-b04-413-10M3623)
 Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.6-b01-413, mixed mode)

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Also, very interesting that you have a Mac.  So does everyone else
 that has seen the problem.  What jdk version are you running?

 Karl

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 What does your manifoldcf.log file have in it?

 Karl

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Karl

 Ok, I'll try to reproduce this using code from repository...

 I'm using following locale on my machine (Mac OS X 10.6.8):

 LANG=C
 LC_COLLATE=ru_RU.UTF-8
 LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8
 LC_MESSAGES=C
 LC_MONETARY=ru_RU.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C
 LC_TIME=ru_RU.UTF-8
 LC_ALL=

 And here is example of request from my browser:

 GET /~ott/ HTTP/1.1
 Host: localhost
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0
 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
 Accept-Language:
 en-GB,en,ru-RU,ru;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.9,de-DE;q=0.9,de;q=0.9,en-gb;q=0.8,fr-FR;q=0.8,fr;q=0.8,it-IT;q=0.8,it;q=0.7,hu-HU;q=0.7,hu;q=0.7,en-us;q=0.7,en-ww;q=0.7,nl-NL;q=0.6,nl;q=0.6,en-ca;q=0.6,zh-CN;q=0.6,zh;q=0.5,EN-US;q=0.5,EN;q=0.5,en-US.UTF-8;q=0.5,uk-UA;q=0.4,uk;q=0.4,in-ID;q=0.4,in;q=0.4,cs-CZ;q=0.3,cs;q=0.3,en-en;q=0.3,ja-JP;q=0.3,ja;q=0.3,he-IL;q=0.2,he;q=0.2,en-GB.UTF-8;q=0.2,fi-FI;q=0.2,fi;q=0.1,en-US-ORACLE9I;q=0.1,en-s;q=0.1,en-ws;q=0.1,en-AU;q=0.0,en;q=0.0
 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
 Connection: keep-alive

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Alex,

 What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized
 translation.  If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's
 supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text.  If
 it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead.

 The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been
 impossible for me to reproduce.  I've been using an add-on in Firefox
 which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter
 what locale I select.  However, in Italy apparently the same thing
 happened on one machine as is now happening for you.  We presumed that
 the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting
 the problem, apparently incorrectly.

 The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a
 problem and the others are OK.  The code, though, for rendering all
 the fields is, however, identical.

 Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given
 the bizarre nature of the issue.

 Karl

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote:
 I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is 
 correct

 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Karl Wright

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Karl Wright
 to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Alex Ott
 downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything 
 is correct

 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-06 Thread Alex Ott
 .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything 
 is correct

 There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to
 dist/example directory, while there is only example directory

 I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see
 listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text

 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



 --
 With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott


[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi, 

You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
and there is also a tag in svn
under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Alex Ott
Hi Shinichiro

what tool are you using to create md5 files? Can you make these files
compatible with md5sum -c ?

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi, Alex

I use gnupg 1.4.12(gnupg-w32cli-1.4.12.exe).
I've checked checksum by command openssl md5.
But sorry, I don't know if it can be compatible with md5sum.

Shinichiro  

On 2012/04/05, at 20:18, Alex Ott wrote:

 Hi Shinichiro
 
 what tool are you using to create md5 files? Can you make these files
 compatible with md5sum -c ?
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
 RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe
 
 
 
 -- 
 With best wishes,Alex Ott
 http://alexott.net/
 Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
 Skype: alex.ott



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
Found a technical problem already.  The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no
longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target.  CONNECTORS-451.
This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we
respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix.  Any
disagreement?

Karl


On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
Found what I think is a blocker.  CONNECTORS-452.

Karl

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Found a technical problem already.  The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no
 longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target.  CONNECTORS-451.
 This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we
 respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix.  Any
 disagreement?

 Karl


 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
Pulled up a fix.  Looks like we'll need another RC - but first let's
wait for feedback from the incubator about the legal
license/notice/etc files.

Karl

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Found what I think is a blocker.  CONNECTORS-452.

 Karl

 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Found a technical problem already.  The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no
 longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target.  CONNECTORS-451.
 This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we
 respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix.  Any
 disagreement?

 Karl


 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
I haven't heard anything back from the incubator folks, but I did find
and pull up fixes to two blocking tickets.  So I suggest we withdraw
RC4 and build RC5, and call the vote.

Thanks,
Karl

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Pulled up a fix.  Looks like we'll need another RC - but first let's
 wait for feedback from the incubator about the legal
 license/notice/etc files.

 Karl

 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Found what I think is a blocker.  CONNECTORS-452.

 Karl

 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Found a technical problem already.  The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no
 longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target.  CONNECTORS-451.
 This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we
 respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix.  Any
 disagreement?

 Karl


 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4

2012-04-05 Thread Shinichiro Abe
We withdraw RC4 and I'll create RC5 today.

Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/04/06, at 7:41, Karl Wright wrote:

 I haven't heard anything back from the incubator folks, but I did find
 and pull up fixes to two blocking tickets.  So I suggest we withdraw
 RC4 and build RC5, and call the vote.
 
 Thanks,
 Karl
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Pulled up a fix.  Looks like we'll need another RC - but first let's
 wait for feedback from the incubator about the legal
 license/notice/etc files.
 
 Karl
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Found what I think is a blocker.  CONNECTORS-452.
 
 Karl
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Found a technical problem already.  The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no
 longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target.  CONNECTORS-451.
 This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we
 respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix.  Any
 disagreement?
 
 Karl
 
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
 RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-05 Thread Shinichiro Abe
You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
and there is also a tag in svn under 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
Thanks, Abe-san, for doing this yet again.  I'll download the RC now.

Karl

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5

2012-04-05 Thread Karl Wright
Downloaded it, ran the binary using PostgreSQL, built it and ran the
derby and hsqldb tests.  All looks good (although I found a minor i18n
error in the UI).  +1 from me.

Karl

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks, Abe-san, for doing this yet again.  I'll download the RC now.

 Karl

 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/
 and there is also a tag in svn under
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-04 Thread Shinichiro Abe
I'll create RC4 tomorrow.

Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/04/03, at 23:38, Karl Wright wrote:

 Update: I'm just about ready to ask for a new RC that contains the following:
 
 - No checked-in binaries at all
 - A new XXX-lib target just containing license files and binaries
 - Patched jars built on the fly from patch files included in the
 source distribution
 
 In order to make all this work, the ant build has been extended with
 the following targets, which replace download-dependencies:
 
 make-core-deps (downloads and/or builds dependent jars and puts them in lib)
 make-deps (downloads proprietary jars)
 
 Thus, to build from source, you need to either:
 
 (1) Unpack source tar, unpack lib tar, and run ant build, or
 optionally ant make-deps build
 (2) Unpack source tar, run ant make-core-deps, and then either ant
 build or ant make-deps build
 
 If the make-core-deps target is objectionable, I can of course remove
 it from ant help so it is hidden.  It's essential, though, for release
 engineering purposes.
 
 Karl
 
 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 If this is the next thing the community wants to try, I won't stand in
 the way.  I just got the impression that there's more wrong with our
 build than just including dependent binaries - we also have problems
 with the dependent binaries themselves in some cases.
 
 Nevertheless, should I call a vote on (say) reverting to RC1 and
 applying the stated shell commands to the resulting artifacts?  The
 commands should also include .wsp files as well as jars, but that is a
 minor issue.
 
 Karl
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Possible solutions include:
 
 There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier:
 
 (5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437
 source tree to a separate -lib package like this:
 
$ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
$ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar'  lib.txt
$ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt  lib.txt
$ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt  lib.txt
$ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt
 
 We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source
 release and include build instructions like the following:
 
$ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
$ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz
$ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating
$ ant build
 
 That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the
 newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and
 breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that
 in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled
 would make sense even regardless of policy requirements.
 
 BR,
 
 Jukka Zitting



[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-03 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245062#comment-13245062
 ] 

Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443:
---

Here the two dependencies URLs for the Alfresco Connector that are not in 
public Maven repositories:

* 
http://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-open-mirror/alfresco/HEAD/root/projects/3rd-party/lib/wss4j-1.5.4-patched.jar
* 
http://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-open-mirror/alfresco/HEAD/root/projects/3rd-party/lib/opensaml-1.0.1.jar

 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-03 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245094#comment-13245094
 ] 

Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443:
---

Here xmlsec:
* 
http://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-open-mirror/alfresco/HEAD/root/projects/3rd-party/lib/xmlsec-1.4.1.jar

 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-03 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245107#comment-13245107
 ] 

Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443:
---

Here the dependencies for H2 support:
* http://clojars.org/repo/it/sk/alfresco/h2-support/1.1/h2-support-1.1.jar
* http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/h2database/h2/1.3.158/h2-1.3.158.jar

 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-03 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245131#comment-13245131
 ] 

Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443:
---

Another here:
* 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix/org.osgi.core/1.0.0/org.osgi.core-1.0.0.jar

 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-03 Thread Karl Wright (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245258#comment-13245258
 ] 

Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-443:


Thanks to Piergiorgio, all downloads are now taken care of, so no Apache 
resource other than Maven is accessed when grabbing the dependent jars.  The 
one exception is building the patched xerces and commons-httpclient jars, which 
check these projects out from tags in order to build.

If tests pass, we may be ready for the next 0.5-incubating RC.


 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-03 Thread Karl Wright (Resolved) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Karl Wright resolved CONNECTORS-443.


Resolution: Fixed

 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-03 Thread Karl Wright
Update: I'm just about ready to ask for a new RC that contains the following:

- No checked-in binaries at all
- A new XXX-lib target just containing license files and binaries
- Patched jars built on the fly from patch files included in the
source distribution

In order to make all this work, the ant build has been extended with
the following targets, which replace download-dependencies:

make-core-deps (downloads and/or builds dependent jars and puts them in lib)
make-deps (downloads proprietary jars)

Thus, to build from source, you need to either:

(1) Unpack source tar, unpack lib tar, and run ant build, or
optionally ant make-deps build
(2) Unpack source tar, run ant make-core-deps, and then either ant
build or ant make-deps build

If the make-core-deps target is objectionable, I can of course remove
it from ant help so it is hidden.  It's essential, though, for release
engineering purposes.

Karl

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 If this is the next thing the community wants to try, I won't stand in
 the way.  I just got the impression that there's more wrong with our
 build than just including dependent binaries - we also have problems
 with the dependent binaries themselves in some cases.

 Nevertheless, should I call a vote on (say) reverting to RC1 and
 applying the stated shell commands to the resulting artifacts?  The
 commands should also include .wsp files as well as jars, but that is a
 minor issue.

 Karl


 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Possible solutions include:

 There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier:

 (5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437
 source tree to a separate -lib package like this:

    $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
    $ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar'  lib.txt
    $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt  lib.txt
    $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt  lib.txt
    $ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt

 We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source
 release and include build instructions like the following:

    $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
    $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz
    $ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating
    $ ant build

 That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the
 newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and
 breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that
 in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled
 would make sense even regardless of policy requirements.

 BR,

 Jukka Zitting


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
Ok, should be fixed.

Karl


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Those files should not be there; it's probably a result of a missing
 exclude in the build.xml.  I'll open a ticket and look at it.

 Thanks!
 Karl


 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 I found jar files in -src.zip and -src.tar.gz

 ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-3.x-plugin.jar
 ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-4.x-plugin.jar

 Should these files be removed?

 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/04/02, at 13:10, Shinichiro Abe wrote:

 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC2 fixed the following issues:
 CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no
 binary files are included in the source distribution.  All of them are now
 downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target.

 I've already checked signatures.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



[CANCEL][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2

2012-04-02 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Thank you.
I'm going to create RC3.

Shinichiro Abe
 
On 2012/04/02, at 18:27, Karl Wright wrote:

 Ok, should be fixed.
 
 Karl
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Those files should not be there; it's probably a result of a missing
 exclude in the build.xml.  I'll open a ticket and look at it.
 
 Thanks!
 Karl
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 I found jar files in -src.zip and -src.tar.gz
 
 ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-3.x-plugin.jar
 ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-4.x-plugin.jar
 
 Should these files be removed?
 
 Shinichiro Abe
 
 On 2012/04/02, at 13:10, Shinichiro Abe wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
 RC2 fixed the following issues:
 CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no
 binary files are included in the source distribution.  All of them are now
 downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target.
 
 I've already checked signatures.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe
 



[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi, 

You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/
and there is also a tag in svn
under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

RC3 fixed the following issues:
CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external
sources.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Shinichiro Abe
+1 from me
 
I've already checked signatures.

Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/04/02, at 20:07, Shinichiro Abe wrote:

 Hi, 
 
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
 RC3 fixed the following issues:
 CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external
 sources.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe
 



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
Hi Abe-san,

The bin packages look much smaller than the ones I built here when I
was testing things out.  Did you remember to include the proprietary
materials before you built the RC?

I'm about to unpack the bin.zip to see if my suspicion is warranted...

Karl

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC3 fixed the following issues:
 CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external
 sources.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
At first glance it looks like the bin packages are complete;
apparently I must have inadvertantly included something else in my bin
packages when I built them (they were 175M each).  Trying it out
now...

Karl


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Abe-san,

 The bin packages look much smaller than the ones I built here when I
 was testing things out.  Did you remember to include the proprietary
 materials before you built the RC?

 I'm about to unpack the bin.zip to see if my suspicion is warranted...

 Karl

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC3 fixed the following issues:
 CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external
 sources.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
I checked out the bin.zip package; all looked good.  I opened one
ticket about a minor problem (CONNECTORS-442) which is that the bin
packages include ant and maven build scripts, but that's not enough to
block release.

The only other potential problem is that the
license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to
incubator guidelines.  Specifically, we are not including a different
set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was
unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr)
is still acceptable or not.  The thread in general@i.a.o provided some
examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable
formats.  I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we
present this artifact to the incubator.

Otherwise, +1 from me.

Karl


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 At first glance it looks like the bin packages are complete;
 apparently I must have inadvertantly included something else in my bin
 packages when I built them (they were 175M each).  Trying it out
 now...

 Karl


 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Abe-san,

 The bin packages look much smaller than the ones I built here when I
 was testing things out.  Did you remember to include the proprietary
 materials before you built the RC?

 I'm about to unpack the bin.zip to see if my suspicion is warranted...

 Karl

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC3 fixed the following issues:
 CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external
 sources.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 The only other potential problem is that the
 license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to
 incubator guidelines.  Specifically, we are not including a different
 set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was
 unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr)
 is still acceptable or not.  The thread in general@i.a.o provided some
 examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable
 formats.  I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we
 present this artifact to the incubator.

Ideally the licensing metadata (i.e. the LICENSE and NOTICE files)
should only cover material contained in that specific package. See [1]
 for a related discussion from a few years ago. At least back then it
seemed acceptable for a project to also only maintain a single set of
license metadata that covers the contents of both source and binary
distributions. AFAIUI that approach is in use by many Apache projects.

About the RC more generally, I find the download-via-svn target a bit
troublesome as it makes the release depend on content in svn. That
essentially turns the svn server into a release distribution channel,
which it definitely shouldn't be.

I think it's fine to manage the set of binary dependencies (that
aren't available in a stable third party location like Maven Central)
in svn, but a release should not try to access them from there.
Instead we should for example package them up in a separate -lib or
-deps archive and make it available for download along with the source
release through the standard Apache mirroring network. That archive
should also come with appropriate licensing metadata that's currently
lacking in bin-dist.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/bttmkavpicxxg7gl

BR,

Jukka Zitting


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
My major concern with the release of binaries through the standard
Apache channel is that we then effectively have another release that
must be synchronized with the main release, since the non-maven
binaries are not, by definition, part of the main release.

I set bin-dist up with that in mind, so that it can effectively remain
unversioned, and be add only.

If there is no other choice than parallel releases of binaries and
source, with a separation of binaries and source in the svn tree, then
I will have to think through the best solution.  Certainly we will
have to treat binaries from different sources differently.  For
example, all of the following would potentially need a different
solution:

(1) Stuff that's available from maven that is license-compatible with Apache
(2) Stuff that's available from maven that is NOT license-compatible with Apache
(3) Stuff that's not available from maven that is license-compatible with Apache
(4) Stuff that's not available from maven that is not
license-compatible with Apache

We could not package dependencies that are (2) or (4).  We would
*have* to package (3), but not necessarily (1).

Is this making your head spin yet?  Mine is...

An svn-based download is technically little different than a source
checkout, seems to me, which is why I wonder why we would make a
distinction at all.

Karl





On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 The only other potential problem is that the
 license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to
 incubator guidelines.  Specifically, we are not including a different
 set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was
 unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr)
 is still acceptable or not.  The thread in general@i.a.o provided some
 examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable
 formats.  I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we
 present this artifact to the incubator.

 Ideally the licensing metadata (i.e. the LICENSE and NOTICE files)
 should only cover material contained in that specific package. See [1]
  for a related discussion from a few years ago. At least back then it
 seemed acceptable for a project to also only maintain a single set of
 license metadata that covers the contents of both source and binary
 distributions. AFAIUI that approach is in use by many Apache projects.

 About the RC more generally, I find the download-via-svn target a bit
 troublesome as it makes the release depend on content in svn. That
 essentially turns the svn server into a release distribution channel,
 which it definitely shouldn't be.

 I think it's fine to manage the set of binary dependencies (that
 aren't available in a stable third party location like Maven Central)
 in svn, but a release should not try to access them from there.
 Instead we should for example package them up in a separate -lib or
 -deps archive and make it available for download along with the source
 release through the standard Apache mirroring network. That archive
 should also come with appropriate licensing metadata that's currently
 lacking in bin-dist.

 [1] http://markmail.org/message/bttmkavpicxxg7gl

 BR,

 Jukka Zitting


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
Hi folks,

As for the last pile of revisions, which download dependencies from
Maven or SVN depending, Jukka and I agreed that we'll also need either
a dependencies artifact or a source + dependencies artifact.  How we
get the dependencies in the first place, though, is still unclear, so
we decided to put the question to infrastruct...@apache.org to find
out their opinion of whether downloading binaries from svn was
acceptable.  I did not get a clear answer to that, but I can say the
following:

(1) There is a clear level of discomfort about storing ANY binaries in
apache infrastructure.
(2) For patched dependent releases, the recommended process is to
download source tar/zip, unpack it, apply patches, and build it, all
as part of the build process for the main release.
(3) For those releases that simply do not exist at all in Maven, the
ideal process is to download the sources and build them.

The problems, then, are as follows:

(1) ManifoldCF binary distributions include packages which can only be
built on specific architectures.  For example, the SharePoint 3.0 mcf
plugin.
(2) Patching of source cannot be done in a standard way on both
Windows and Linux, other than within an SVN checkout (via svn patch).
(3) There may be some binary dependencies whose sources are hard to
get hold of, e.g. jdbcpool-0.99.jar, which are also not found in
Maven.

Possible solutions include:

(1) Only patch sources that we can check out via svn.  This implies
that, during the build process, instead of checking out a single
binary, we check out an entire source tree.  Then we can apply the
patch.  Downside: svn access required during build.
(2) Remove the dependency on anything we find we can't get the sources
for, such as jdbcpool-0.99.  Downside: requires significant code
changes.
(3) Check in the binaries for all platform-dependent builds into
googlecode.  Downside: Not clear whether the Incubator will consider
this reasonable.
(4) Require that builds only take place on Windows machines with
appropriate Windows tools and upstream dependencies installed.
Downside: Essentially a non-starter.

Obviously all of this will greatly complicate the build and release
process for ManifoldCF, if indeed there is exists an acceptable
solution at all.  I honestly don't have a workable answer in mind at
this point for all of the new constraints we're dealing with.



Karl


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 My major concern with the release of binaries through the standard
 Apache channel is that we then effectively have another release that
 must be synchronized with the main release, since the non-maven
 binaries are not, by definition, part of the main release.

 I set bin-dist up with that in mind, so that it can effectively remain
 unversioned, and be add only.

 If there is no other choice than parallel releases of binaries and
 source, with a separation of binaries and source in the svn tree, then
 I will have to think through the best solution.  Certainly we will
 have to treat binaries from different sources differently.  For
 example, all of the following would potentially need a different
 solution:

 (1) Stuff that's available from maven that is license-compatible with Apache
 (2) Stuff that's available from maven that is NOT license-compatible with 
 Apache
 (3) Stuff that's not available from maven that is license-compatible with 
 Apache
 (4) Stuff that's not available from maven that is not
 license-compatible with Apache

 We could not package dependencies that are (2) or (4).  We would
 *have* to package (3), but not necessarily (1).

 Is this making your head spin yet?  Mine is...

 An svn-based download is technically little different than a source
 checkout, seems to me, which is why I wonder why we would make a
 distinction at all.

 Karl





 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 The only other potential problem is that the
 license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to
 incubator guidelines.  Specifically, we are not including a different
 set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was
 unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr)
 is still acceptable or not.  The thread in general@i.a.o provided some
 examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable
 formats.  I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we
 present this artifact to the incubator.

 Ideally the licensing metadata (i.e. the LICENSE and NOTICE files)
 should only cover material contained in that specific package. See [1]
  for a related discussion from a few years ago. At least back then it
 seemed acceptable for a project to also only maintain a single set of
 license metadata that covers the contents of both source and binary
 distributions. AFAIUI that approach is in use by many Apache projects

[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright (Created) (JIRA)
All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process


 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.

The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:

(1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.

(2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.

(3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
contain all the dependency binaries.

(4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.



--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244493#comment-13244493
 ] 

Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-443:


Another complication is other Apache Java projects which have patched jars in 
their dependencies.  Apache Chemistry has a couple, I believe, and we have a 
CMIS connector.
 

 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Possible solutions include:

There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier:

(5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437
source tree to a separate -lib package like this:

$ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
$ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar'  lib.txt
$ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt  lib.txt
$ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt  lib.txt
$ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt

We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source
release and include build instructions like the following:

$ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
$ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz
$ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating
$ ant build

That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the
newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and
breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that
in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled
would make sense even regardless of policy requirements.

BR,

Jukka Zitting


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright
If this is the next thing the community wants to try, I won't stand in
the way.  I just got the impression that there's more wrong with our
build than just including dependent binaries - we also have problems
with the dependent binaries themselves in some cases.

Nevertheless, should I call a vote on (say) reverting to RC1 and
applying the stated shell commands to the resulting artifacts?  The
commands should also include .wsp files as well as jars, but that is a
minor issue.

Karl


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Possible solutions include:

 There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier:

 (5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437
 source tree to a separate -lib package like this:

    $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
    $ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar'  lib.txt
    $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt  lib.txt
    $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt  lib.txt
    $ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt

 We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source
 release and include build instructions like the following:

    $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz
    $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz
    $ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating
    $ ant build

 That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the
 newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and
 breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that
 in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled
 would make sense even regardless of policy requirements.

 BR,

 Jukka Zitting


[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process

2012-04-02 Thread Karl Wright (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244788#comment-13244788
 ] 

Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-443:


For jetty, it looks like the right answer might be to move to Jetty 7, since 
that supposedly fixes the problems.  Jetty 6 builds with Maven, which 
definitely would complicate the build even further by providing yet more build 
dependencies.  Hopefully the port won't be too painful.


 All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-443
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Build
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Blocker
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any 
 longer.  The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as 
 part of the build process.  In order for the build process to succeed on 
 Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn.
 The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket:
 (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven 
 should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist.  This 
 will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins.
 (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into 
 download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies.  The 
 download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, 
 patching, and building the non-proprietary packages.  Packages that will need 
 to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 
 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26.
 (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will 
 contain all the dependency binaries.
 (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a 
 sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC1

2012-04-01 Thread Shinichiro Abe
HI,

I close RC1 for CONNECTORS-437 
regarding embedded jar files in the source.
I'll create RC2 today.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe
On 2012/03/27, at 15:55, Piergiorgio Lucidi wrote:

 I tried to use the binary distribution starting some jobs with CMIS and
 ElasticSearch.
 +1 from me.
 
 Piergiorgio
 
 Il giorno 27 marzo 2012 04:00, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.comha scritto:
 
 Hi,
 
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC1/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
 RC1 fixed the following issues by IPMC requests:
 1. CONNECTORS-434: Describe which licenses we select for our dual-licensed
 jars.(LICENSE.txt)
 2. CONNECTORS-433: Update copyright date.(NOTICE.txt)
 3. My code signing Key is available online.
 
 I've already checked signatures.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe
 
 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com
 
 



[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2

2012-04-01 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi, 

You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/
and there is also a tag in svn
under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

RC2 fixed the following issues:
CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no
binary files are included in the source distribution.  All of them are now
downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target.

I've already checked signatures.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2

2012-04-01 Thread Shinichiro Abe
I found jar files in -src.zip and -src.tar.gz

./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-3.x-plugin.jar
./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-4.x-plugin.jar

Should these files be removed?

Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/04/02, at 13:10, Shinichiro Abe wrote:

 Hi, 
 
 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.
 
 RC2 fixed the following issues:
 CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no
 binary files are included in the source distribution.  All of them are now
 downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target.
 
 I've already checked signatures.
 
 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe



[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-438) Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the mirror - the rest should point to the archive

2012-03-28 Thread Karl Wright (Created) (JIRA)
Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the 
mirror - the rest should point to the archive


 Key: CONNECTORS-438
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-438
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.6
Reporter: Karl Wright
Assignee: Karl Wright
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6


The download page should refer to only the current release via the mirror.  All 
older releases should refer to http://archive.apache.org/dist.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC1

2012-03-26 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi, 

You can download the release candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC1/
and there is also a tag in svn
under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

RC1 fixed the following issues by IPMC requests:
1. CONNECTORS-434: Describe which licenses we select for our dual-licensed 
jars.(LICENSE.txt)
2. CONNECTORS-433: Update copyright date.(NOTICE.txt)
3. My code signing Key is available online.

I've already checked signatures.

Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC1

2012-03-26 Thread Karl Wright
Checked the changes, and made sure that the binary distribution runs.
+1 from me.

Karl

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 You can download the release candidate from
 http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC1/
 and there is also a tag in svn
 under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags.

 RC1 fixed the following issues by IPMC requests:
 1. CONNECTORS-434: Describe which licenses we select for our dual-licensed 
 jars.(LICENSE.txt)
 2. CONNECTORS-433: Update copyright date.(NOTICE.txt)
 3. My code signing Key is available online.

 I've already checked signatures.

 Thank you,
 Shinichiro Abe


[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-25 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Three +1's.  72 hours.  Vote passes!

Next, I need to open a vote in gene...@incubator.apache.org

Thank you everyone.
Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/03/22, at 18:55, Piergiorgio Lucidi wrote:

 I checked signatures and I used the application from the binary package.
 
 +1 from me
 
 Piergiorgio
 
 Il 22 marzo 2012 02:27, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto:
 Signatures look good. +1 from me.
 Karl
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 + 1 from me
 
 Shinichiro Abe
 
 On 2012/03/22, at 2:24, Karl Wright wrote:
 
 Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys
 and signatures.
 
 Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready...
 
 Karl
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com



[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-21 Thread Karl Wright
Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys
and signatures.

Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready...

Karl


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-21 Thread Alex Ott
+1

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys
 and signatures.

 Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready...

 Karl



-- 
With best wishes,                    Alex Ott
http://alexott.net/
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
Skype: alex.ott


Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-21 Thread Shinichiro Abe

+ 1 from me

Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/03/22, at 2:24, Karl Wright wrote:

 Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys
 and signatures.
 
 Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready...
 
 Karl



Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?

2012-03-20 Thread Erlend Garåsen

On 19.03.12 20.33, Karl Wright wrote:

Hi all,

I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be
able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was
scheduled for 0.5-incubating.  Since the day is rapidly approaching
when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to
whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's
plate for the next release.  The tickets in question are
CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404.

+1 from me for postponing.

Karl


+1

--
Erlend Garåsen
Center for Information Technology Services
University of Oslo
P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050


Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?

2012-03-20 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
+1 from me.

Piergiorgio

Il 19 marzo 2012 20:33, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto:
 Hi all,

 I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be
 able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was
 scheduled for 0.5-incubating.  Since the day is rapidly approaching
 when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to
 whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's
 plate for the next release.  The tickets in question are
 CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404.

 +1 from me for postponing.

 Karl



-- 
Piergiorgio Lucidi
http://www.open4dev.com


Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?

2012-03-20 Thread Karl Wright
Ok, I've postponed.  Piergiorgio, do you still intend to generate
Japanese screenshots for the ElasticSearch connector documentation?
If not we should postpone that ticket as well.

Karl

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
piergior...@apache.org wrote:
 +1 from me.

 Piergiorgio

 Il 19 marzo 2012 20:33, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto:
 Hi all,

 I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be
 able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was
 scheduled for 0.5-incubating.  Since the day is rapidly approaching
 when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to
 whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's
 plate for the next release.  The tickets in question are
 CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404.

 +1 from me for postponing.

 Karl



 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com


Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?

2012-03-20 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
I would like to work on Japanese screenshots.
Give me an hour.

Piergiorgio

Il 20 marzo 2012 13:18, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto:
 Ok, I've postponed.  Piergiorgio, do you still intend to generate
 Japanese screenshots for the ElasticSearch connector documentation?
 If not we should postpone that ticket as well.

 Karl

 On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
 piergior...@apache.org wrote:
 +1 from me.

 Piergiorgio

 Il 19 marzo 2012 20:33, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto:
 Hi all,

 I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be
 able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was
 scheduled for 0.5-incubating.  Since the day is rapidly approaching
 when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to
 whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's
 plate for the next release.  The tickets in question are
 CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404.

 +1 from me for postponing.

 Karl



 --
 Piergiorgio Lucidi
 http://www.open4dev.com



-- 
Piergiorgio Lucidi
http://www.open4dev.com


Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?

2012-03-19 Thread Karl Wright
Hi all,

I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be
able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was
scheduled for 0.5-incubating.  Since the day is rapidly approaching
when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to
whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's
plate for the next release.  The tickets in question are
CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404.

+1 from me for postponing.

Karl


Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?

2012-03-19 Thread Shinichiro Abe
+1

Shinichiro 
On 2012/03/20, at 4:33, Karl Wright wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be
 able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was
 scheduled for 0.5-incubating.  Since the day is rapidly approaching
 when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to
 whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's
 plate for the next release.  The tickets in question are
 CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404.
 
 +1 from me for postponing.
 
 Karl



Re: Release time is upon us once again

2012-03-14 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
Hi Karl,

Il 14 marzo 2012 00:44, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto:
 Hi fellow developers,

 Our next release date is rapidly approaching.  We've been releasing a
 version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year
 now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away.

 There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs.  Two are
 Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search
 connector.  The latter is unassigned.  Please finish these up as
 quickly as possible!

I'll try to work on this last issue during these days and I'll let you
know the progress commenting on JIRA ;)


 Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until
 now.  Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for
 0.5-incubating?  I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all
 of my Windows-based scripts.

 Karl



-- 
Piergiorgio Lucidi
http://www.open4dev.com


Re: Release time is upon us once again

2012-03-14 Thread Shinichiro Abe
Hi.

I want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating.
I use Mac OS, but please teach me some ways if I can work.

Regards,
Shinichiro Abe

On 2012/03/14, at 8:44, Karl Wright wrote:

 Hi fellow developers,
 
 Our next release date is rapidly approaching.  We've been releasing a
 version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year
 now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away.
 
 There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs.  Two are
 Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search
 connector.  The latter is unassigned.  Please finish these up as
 quickly as possible!
 
 Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until
 now.  Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for
 0.5-incubating?  I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all
 of my Windows-based scripts.
 
 Karl



Re: Release time is upon us once again

2012-03-14 Thread Karl Wright
Great, and thanks for volunteering!

The first thing to do create your key and add it to the KEYS file in
the project (if not already there), and add it to the Web of Trust.
The necessary steps are listed here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing

I urge you to follow these instructions carefully; getting this right
is the hardest part of becoming a release engineer. ;-)

The second part involves the release itself.  I have a number of
Windows scripts that are useful for releases, which I will get into
some kind of order and commit to svn.  You will probably want to
create Linux equivalents.

Please keep me informed as to how it is going.

Karl

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi.

 I want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating.
 I use Mac OS, but please teach me some ways if I can work.

 Regards,
 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/03/14, at 8:44, Karl Wright wrote:

 Hi fellow developers,

 Our next release date is rapidly approaching.  We've been releasing a
 version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year
 now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away.

 There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs.  Two are
 Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search
 connector.  The latter is unassigned.  Please finish these up as
 quickly as possible!

 Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until
 now.  Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for
 0.5-incubating?  I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all
 of my Windows-based scripts.

 Karl



Re: Release time is upon us once again

2012-03-14 Thread Karl Wright
I checked in my scripts into:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/release-scripts.

Once you read the Apache instructions, you might want to look at my
scripts to see how they fit in.  Essentially, they build the release
candidates, sign them, and upload them (hardwired to go to my account
on people.apache.org, unfortunately - which I need to fix).

Thanks,
Karl


On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Great, and thanks for volunteering!

 The first thing to do create your key and add it to the KEYS file in
 the project (if not already there), and add it to the Web of Trust.
 The necessary steps are listed here:
 http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing

 I urge you to follow these instructions carefully; getting this right
 is the hardest part of becoming a release engineer. ;-)

 The second part involves the release itself.  I have a number of
 Windows scripts that are useful for releases, which I will get into
 some kind of order and commit to svn.  You will probably want to
 create Linux equivalents.

 Please keep me informed as to how it is going.

 Karl

 On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Shinichiro Abe
 shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi.

 I want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating.
 I use Mac OS, but please teach me some ways if I can work.

 Regards,
 Shinichiro Abe

 On 2012/03/14, at 8:44, Karl Wright wrote:

 Hi fellow developers,

 Our next release date is rapidly approaching.  We've been releasing a
 version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year
 now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away.

 There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs.  Two are
 Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search
 connector.  The latter is unassigned.  Please finish these up as
 quickly as possible!

 Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until
 now.  Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for
 0.5-incubating?  I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all
 of my Windows-based scripts.

 Karl



Release time is upon us once again

2012-03-13 Thread Karl Wright
Hi fellow developers,

Our next release date is rapidly approaching.  We've been releasing a
version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year
now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away.

There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs.  Two are
Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search
connector.  The latter is unassigned.  Please finish these up as
quickly as possible!

Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until
now.  Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for
0.5-incubating?  I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all
of my Windows-based scripts.

Karl


[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-418) Re-examine the call to the non-published method on the next release of OpenCMIS

2012-02-29 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi (Created) (JIRA)
Re-examine the call to the non-published method on the next release of OpenCMIS
---

 Key: CONNECTORS-418
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-418
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: CMIS connector
Reporter: Piergiorgio Lucidi
Assignee: Piergiorgio Lucidi


We have to re-examine the way that we are using to retrieve the document uri 
(content stream).
Now we are using a way suggested by Florian Muller but it seems that it could 
be the possibility of a future public method in the OpenCMIS API.

Here the link of the suggestion:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-chemistry-dev/201009.mbox/%3c13092343.447851284629268276.javamail.r...@zimbra.alfresco.com%3E

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-399) Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information

2012-02-03 Thread Hitoshi Ozawa (Created) (JIRA)
Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information


 Key: CONNECTORS-399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Hitoshi Ozawa
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5


Japanese site needs to be updated to contain release 0.4 information.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Assigned] (CONNECTORS-399) Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information

2012-02-03 Thread Karl Wright (Assigned) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Karl Wright reassigned CONNECTORS-399:
--

Assignee: Karl Wright

 Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information
 

 Key: CONNECTORS-399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399
 Project: ManifoldCF
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5
Reporter: Hitoshi Ozawa
Assignee: Karl Wright
Priority: Trivial
  Labels: I18N
 Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5

 Attachments: CONNECTORS-399.patch


 Japanese site needs to be updated to contain release 0.4 information.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




  1   2   3   >