Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC1
I verified all the signatures with success. I tried to use the binary distribution. I tried to build the project from the source distribution with success. So I think that it's ok for me. +1 from me Piergiorgio 2012/5/18 Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC1/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags RC1 includes revising the pom.xml versions. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC1
I unpacked the bin and gave it a hand test. Looks good. +1 Karl On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC1/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags RC1 includes revising the pom.xml versions. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-473) We need to separate our site into two pieces: One for the ManifoldCF project, and one for each release
Karl Wright created CONNECTORS-473: -- Summary: We need to separate our site into two pieces: One for the ManifoldCF project, and one for each release Key: CONNECTORS-473 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-473 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Improvement Components: Build, Documentation Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.6 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6 Part of the ManifoldCF site has to do with the ManifoldCF project, and part of it is germane to a given release. We should separate these so that the project-related part builds separately, under site/trunk, and references one (or more) release-related sites, under branches/XXX/site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0
I see two problems. First, the outer level names are correct (apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect (apache-manifoldcf-0.5). This is odd because the build.xml has this line: target name=set-version property name=release-version value=0.5.1/ /target so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with an old version of build.xml. The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also. They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5. I'll take care of that. Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! I'll have a look in the morning... Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags I've already checked signatures, run example and run ant test-dr test-hs. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0
ok - I'm done with the maven work. Abe-san, can you check to be sure that the release branch builds with the proper prefixes before tagging again? Thanks! Karl On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I see two problems. First, the outer level names are correct (apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect (apache-manifoldcf-0.5). This is odd because the build.xml has this line: target name=set-version property name=release-version value=0.5.1/ /target so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with an old version of build.xml. The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also. They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5. I'll take care of that. Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! I'll have a look in the morning... Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags I've already checked signatures, run example and run ant test-dr test-hs. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0
What is the prefix inside? I ' m not sure where prefixes is. Where do I check? the source code or jar file? Thank you for modifying the pom.xml. Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/18, at 7:13, Karl Wright wrote: ok - I'm done with the maven work. Abe-san, can you check to be sure that the release branch builds with the proper prefixes before tagging again? Thanks! Karl On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I see two problems. First, the outer level names are correct (apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect (apache-manifoldcf-0.5). This is odd because the build.xml has this line: target name=set-version property name=release-version value=0.5.1/ /target so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with an old version of build.xml. The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also. They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5. I'll take care of that. Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! I'll have a look in the morning... Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags I've already checked signatures, run example and run ant test-dr test-hs. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0
If you open up the zip or tar, the top-level directory is apache-manifoldcf-0.5. That directory is set in build.xml when the zip or tar is built: zip destfile=apache-manifoldcf-${release-version}-src.zip update=false zipfileset dir=. prefix=apache-manifoldcf-${release-version} So, ${release-version} must have been incorrect. But it is correct now on the branch: target name=set-version property name=release-version value=0.5.1/ /target So somehow you must have built the artifacts from a version of the branch before you checked in the release-version change. Karl On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: What is the prefix inside? I ' m not sure where prefixes is. Where do I check? the source code or jar file? Thank you for modifying the pom.xml. Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/18, at 7:13, Karl Wright wrote: ok - I'm done with the maven work. Abe-san, can you check to be sure that the release branch builds with the proper prefixes before tagging again? Thanks! Karl On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I see two problems. First, the outer level names are correct (apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-xxx), but the prefix inside is incorrect (apache-manifoldcf-0.5). This is odd because the build.xml has this line: target name=set-version property name=release-version value=0.5.1/ /target so I cannot explain this unless somehow the artifacts were built with an old version of build.xml. The second problem is that we need to rev the pom.xml versions also. They have to be 0.5.1 not 0.5. I'll take care of that. Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! I'll have a look in the morning... Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags I've already checked signatures, run example and run ant test-dr test-hs. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC1
Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC1/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags RC1 includes revising the pom.xml versions. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0
Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags I've already checked signatures, run example and run ant test-dr test-hs. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5.1, RC0
Thanks! I'll have a look in the morning... Karl On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5.1-RC0/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags I've already checked signatures, run example and run ant test-dr test-hs. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?
Feel free to generate an RC0 for 0.5.1 any time; I think all the correct tickets have been pulled up into the branch already. Thanks! Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Yes we do. Would you be willing to do that? Thanks! Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Okay. Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch? Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote: Hi Abe-san, For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as the main release. So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags. Thanks, Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week. Please create 0.5.1 branch. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote: It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three tickets into the 0.5 release branch: CONNECTORS-453 CONNECTORS-467 CONNECTORS-471 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated. The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating. Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this? Karl On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me. This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably other web containers as well. Erlend On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote: My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain before then. If we succeed in graduating in May, I'd give a +1. If not, then maybe we should just try to release the 0.6 version instead. Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?
It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three tickets into the 0.5 release branch: CONNECTORS-453 CONNECTORS-467 CONNECTORS-471 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated. The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating. Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this? Karl On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me. This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably other web containers as well. Erlend On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote: My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain before then. If we succeed in graduating in May, I'd give a +1. If not, then maybe we should just try to release the 0.6 version instead. Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?
Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week. Please create 0.5.1 branch. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote: It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three tickets into the 0.5 release branch: CONNECTORS-453 CONNECTORS-467 CONNECTORS-471 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated. The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating. Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this? Karl On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me. This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably other web containers as well. Erlend On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote: My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain before then. If we succeed in graduating in May, I'd give a +1. If not, then maybe we should just try to release the 0.6 version instead. Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?
Hi Abe-san, For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as the main release. So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags. Thanks, Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week. Please create 0.5.1 branch. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote: It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three tickets into the 0.5 release branch: CONNECTORS-453 CONNECTORS-467 CONNECTORS-471 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated. The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating. Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this? Karl On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me. This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably other web containers as well. Erlend On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote: My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain before then. If we succeed in graduating in May, I'd give a +1. If not, then maybe we should just try to release the 0.6 version instead. Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?
Okay. Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch? Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote: Hi Abe-san, For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as the main release. So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags. Thanks, Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week. Please create 0.5.1 branch. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote: It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three tickets into the 0.5 release branch: CONNECTORS-453 CONNECTORS-467 CONNECTORS-471 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated. The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating. Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this? Karl On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me. This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably other web containers as well. Erlend On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote: My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain before then. If we succeed in graduating in May, I'd give a +1. If not, then maybe we should just try to release the 0.6 version instead. Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?
Yes we do. Would you be willing to do that? Thanks! Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Okay. Do we need to change release-version into 0.5.1 at build.xml in the branch? Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 19:39, Karl Wright wrote: Hi Abe-san, For point releases, the usual standard is to use the same branch as the main release. So we would continue to use the 0.5-incubating branch, and just make a new release from it, and of course new tags. Thanks, Karl On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Yes I did. I will be able to work as release manager next week. Please create 0.5.1 branch. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/05/12, at 16:14, Karl Wright wrote: It looks like this is probably happening, so I've pulled up three tickets into the 0.5 release branch: CONNECTORS-453 CONNECTORS-467 CONNECTORS-471 I suppose we could even spin a release candidate now, even though we shouldn't probably vote on it until we've officially graduated. The release candidate should be 0.5.1, not 0.5.1-incubating. Abe-san, did you want to be release manager for this? Karl On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: If we succeed in graduating in May, then +1 from me. This problem does not only affects Tomcat, but also Resin, and probably other web containers as well. Erlend On 04.05.12 21.03, Karl Wright wrote: My view: It will be relatively easy to do this once we graduate, and too much of a pain before then. If we succeed in graduating in May, I'd give a +1. If not, then maybe we should just try to release the 0.6 version instead. Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: Should we release an 0.5.1?
I think that it is important to release a 0.5.1 version to enable compatibility for Tomcat 7.x. +1 for me for releasing a 0.5.1 version Piergiorgio 2012/5/1 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com We've had a number of people using Tomcat 7.x who have tripped over CONNECTORS-467. Does the community want to release a 0.5.1 version to fix this one issue? Or, alternatively, try to push 0.6 out the door early? Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-463) Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 0.5-incubating release
Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 0.5-incubating release - Key: CONNECTORS-463 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-463 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Bug Components: Site Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Piergiorgio Lucidi Assignee: Piergiorgio Lucidi Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6 We need to update the site in order to guide developers to correctly build the project using Maven. Due to the latest changes during the 0.5-incubating release, we released the source package with a problem with the Maven build. So, before running mvn clean install, it is needed to run the following command: {code} mvn install:install-file -Dfile=lib/commons-httpclient.jar -DgroupId=commons-httpclient -DartifactId=commons-httpclient-mcf -Dversion=3.1 -Dpackaging=jar {code} The execution of the command above fixes the issue on the source code of the 0.5-incubating release. I tested the command using an empty Maven repository. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-463) Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 0.5-incubating release
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Piergiorgio Lucidi resolved CONNECTORS-463. --- Resolution: Fixed r1328455. Update the site to show how fixing the maven build process for the 0.5-incubating release - Key: CONNECTORS-463 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-463 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Bug Components: Site Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Piergiorgio Lucidi Assignee: Piergiorgio Lucidi Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6 Original Estimate: 1h Remaining Estimate: 1h We need to update the site in order to guide developers to correctly build the project using Maven. Due to the latest changes during the 0.5-incubating release, we released the source package with a problem with the Maven build. So, before running mvn clean install, it is needed to run the following command: {code} mvn install:install-file -Dfile=lib/commons-httpclient.jar -DgroupId=commons-httpclient -DartifactId=commons-httpclient-mcf -Dversion=3.1 -Dpackaging=jar {code} The execution of the command above fixes the issue on the source code of the 0.5-incubating release. I tested the command using an empty Maven repository. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-438) Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the mirror - the rest should point to the archive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Wright resolved CONNECTORS-438. Resolution: Fixed Resolved as part of another commit Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the mirror - the rest should point to the archive Key: CONNECTORS-438 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-438 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Documentation Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.6 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6 The download page should refer to only the current release via the mirror. All older releases should refer to http://archive.apache.org/dist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[RESULT][VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release
Looks like there's no problem with going ahead with this. The ticket is CONNECTORS-459, and I've created a corresponding branch to work on the ticket. Karl On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: +1 Erlend On 11.04.12 02.39, Karl Wright wrote: Folks, When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our next release. The pros of such a move include allowing us to upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7 components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time identify any obvious cons. Please let me know your opinion. +1 to upgrade, from me. Thanks, Karl -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: [VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release
big +1. Tommaso 2012/4/11 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Folks, When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our next release. The pros of such a move include allowing us to upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7 components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time identify any obvious cons. Please let me know your opinion. +1 to upgrade, from me. Thanks, Karl
Re: [VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release
+1 Erlend On 11.04.12 02.39, Karl Wright wrote: Folks, When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our next release. The pros of such a move include allowing us to upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7 components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time identify any obvious cons. Please let me know your opinion. +1 to upgrade, from me. Thanks, Karl -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6
72 hours. Vote passes! Next, I need to open a vote in gene...@incubator.apache.org Thank you everyone. Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6
FWIW, I think the problem was specific to the Mac, or more precisely the Mac's JVM and how it handles resources, which is why my attempts to reproduce it here failed. Karl On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: Hi Karl, yes, now that issue is resolved. It works correctly on Google Chrome using it_IT locale. Piergiorgio Il giorno 10 aprile 2012 14:46, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi Piergiorgio, Did the i18n issues seem to get resolved for you with this RC? Karl On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: Tried the example using a job with CMIS as repository connection and ElasticSearch as output connection. +1 from me Piergiorgio Il giorno 09 aprile 2012 03:04, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.comha scritto: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. I've checked the signatures and ran example. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6
Hi, On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. +1 to release BR, Jukka Zitting
[VOTE] Upgrade ManifoldCF to jdk 1.6 prior to next release
Folks, When doing the dependency rework, it became clear that many of our binary dependencies are stuck without fixes or upgrades because we are still using jdk 1.5. I'd like to get a sense from the community whether everyone thinks we should abandon support for jdk1.5 in our next release. The pros of such a move include allowing us to upgrade to jetty 7 (which brings in a number of bug fixes), tomcat 7 components, and off-the-shelf hsqldb builds. I cannot at this time identify any obvious cons. Please let me know your opinion. +1 to upgrade, from me. Thanks, Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6
I downloaded {bin,lib,src}.zip and chekced md5 checksums - everything ok Binary from example directory works fine, localization issue is fixed... But README.txt still mentions 'dist/example' instead of 'example' +1 for release On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. I've checked the signatures and ran example. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6
The README fix was not pulled up because we're only pulling up critical fixes at this time. However, if the incubator requires another significant change, as I suspect they will, then I think we'll pull up a lot of less-critical fixes while we're at it. Thanks, Karl On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded {bin,lib,src}.zip and chekced md5 checksums - everything ok Binary from example directory works fine, localization issue is fixed... But README.txt still mentions 'dist/example' instead of 'example' +1 for release On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. I've checked the signatures and ran example. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
welcome given the bizarre nature of the issue. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes,Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes,Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes,Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes,Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6
You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. I've checked the signatures and ran example. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6
+1 from me. Karl On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC6/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. I've checked the signatures and ran example. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
Hi Alex, What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized translation. If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text. If it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead. The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been impossible for me to reproduce. I've been using an add-on in Firefox which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter what locale I select. However, in Italy apparently the same thing happened on one machine as is now happening for you. We presumed that the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting the problem, apparently incorrectly. The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a problem and the others are OK. The code, though, for rendering all the fields is, however, identical. Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given the bizarre nature of the issue. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
If you want to experiment a bit, have a look at the file listconnections.jsp (in framework/crawler-ui/src/webapp). The line in question is line 78. Perhaps if you change the line to also output the locale itself we might learn something. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alex, What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized translation. If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text. If it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead. The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been impossible for me to reproduce. I've been using an add-on in Firefox which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter what locale I select. However, in Italy apparently the same thing happened on one machine as is now happening for you. We presumed that the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting the problem, apparently incorrectly. The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a problem and the others are OK. The code, though, for rendering all the fields is, however, identical. Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given the bizarre nature of the issue. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
I've created CONNECTORS-457 to track this issue. If we can figure out what's actually happening we may decide to spin yet another RC to fix the problem. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: If you want to experiment a bit, have a look at the file listconnections.jsp (in framework/crawler-ui/src/webapp). The line in question is line 78. Perhaps if you change the line to also output the locale itself we might learn something. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alex, What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized translation. If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text. If it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead. The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been impossible for me to reproduce. I've been using an add-on in Firefox which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter what locale I select. However, in Italy apparently the same thing happened on one machine as is now happening for you. We presumed that the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting the problem, apparently incorrectly. The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a problem and the others are OK. The code, though, for rendering all the fields is, however, identical. Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given the bizarre nature of the issue. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
Hi Karl Ok, I'll try to reproduce this using code from repository... I'm using following locale on my machine (Mac OS X 10.6.8): LANG=C LC_COLLATE=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=C LC_MONETARY=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_ALL= And here is example of request from my browser: GET /~ott/ HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-GB,en,ru-RU,ru;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.9,de-DE;q=0.9,de;q=0.9,en-gb;q=0.8,fr-FR;q=0.8,fr;q=0.8,it-IT;q=0.8,it;q=0.7,hu-HU;q=0.7,hu;q=0.7,en-us;q=0.7,en-ww;q=0.7,nl-NL;q=0.6,nl;q=0.6,en-ca;q=0.6,zh-CN;q=0.6,zh;q=0.5,EN-US;q=0.5,EN;q=0.5,en-US.UTF-8;q=0.5,uk-UA;q=0.4,uk;q=0.4,in-ID;q=0.4,in;q=0.4,cs-CZ;q=0.3,cs;q=0.3,en-en;q=0.3,ja-JP;q=0.3,ja;q=0.3,he-IL;q=0.2,he;q=0.2,en-GB.UTF-8;q=0.2,fi-FI;q=0.2,fi;q=0.1,en-US-ORACLE9I;q=0.1,en-s;q=0.1,en-ws;q=0.1,en-AU;q=0.0,en;q=0.0 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Connection: keep-alive On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alex, What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized translation. If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text. If it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead. The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been impossible for me to reproduce. I've been using an add-on in Firefox which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter what locale I select. However, in Italy apparently the same thing happened on one machine as is now happening for you. We presumed that the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting the problem, apparently incorrectly. The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a problem and the others are OK. The code, though, for rendering all the fields is, however, identical. Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given the bizarre nature of the issue. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
You happen to be using the very same java version as the other person who is having trouble. I'll have a look at the logs. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I see following errors: ERROR 2012-04-06 12:57:26,822 (1407601211@qtp-1238538872-2) - Missing resource 'listoutputs.DeleteOutputConnection' in bundle 'org.apache.manifoldcf.ui.i18n.common' for locale 'en_GB' java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find resource for bundle java.util.PropertyResourceBundle, key listoutputs.DeleteOutputConnection at java.util.ResourceBundle.getObject(ResourceBundle.java:374) at java.util.ResourceBundle.getString(ResourceBundle.java:334) at org.apache.manifoldcf.core.i18n.Messages.getMessage(Messages.java:180) at org.apache.manifoldcf.core.i18n.Messages.getString(Messages.java:195) at org.apache.manifoldcf.ui.i18n.Messages.getString(Messages.java:98) at org.apache.manifoldcf.ui.i18n.Messages.getString(Messages.java:46) at org.apache.jsp.listoutputs_jsp._jspService(listoutputs_jsp.java:257) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:70) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:388) and for other resources... Full log is at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1796900/manifoldcf.log.gz Regarding Java version - I updated yesterday, and now I have: ott@flash:example/logs\java -version Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 java version 1.6.0_31 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_31-b04-413-10M3623) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.6-b01-413, mixed mode) On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Also, very interesting that you have a Mac. So does everyone else that has seen the problem. What jdk version are you running? Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: What does your manifoldcf.log file have in it? Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Karl Ok, I'll try to reproduce this using code from repository... I'm using following locale on my machine (Mac OS X 10.6.8): LANG=C LC_COLLATE=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=C LC_MONETARY=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_ALL= And here is example of request from my browser: GET /~ott/ HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-GB,en,ru-RU,ru;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.9,de-DE;q=0.9,de;q=0.9,en-gb;q=0.8,fr-FR;q=0.8,fr;q=0.8,it-IT;q=0.8,it;q=0.7,hu-HU;q=0.7,hu;q=0.7,en-us;q=0.7,en-ww;q=0.7,nl-NL;q=0.6,nl;q=0.6,en-ca;q=0.6,zh-CN;q=0.6,zh;q=0.5,EN-US;q=0.5,EN;q=0.5,en-US.UTF-8;q=0.5,uk-UA;q=0.4,uk;q=0.4,in-ID;q=0.4,in;q=0.4,cs-CZ;q=0.3,cs;q=0.3,en-en;q=0.3,ja-JP;q=0.3,ja;q=0.3,he-IL;q=0.2,he;q=0.2,en-GB.UTF-8;q=0.2,fi-FI;q=0.2,fi;q=0.1,en-US-ORACLE9I;q=0.1,en-s;q=0.1,en-ws;q=0.1,en-AU;q=0.0,en;q=0.0 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Connection: keep-alive On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alex, What you are seeing is the i18n key name rather than the localized translation. If you have a locale other than en_US or ja_JP, it's supposed to map the locale to en_US, and look up the English text. If it can't find the key even then, it will render the key name instead. The same issue you have seen has been reported before but it's been impossible for me to reproduce. I've been using an add-on in Firefox which allows me to set the locale but it doesn't fail for me no matter what locale I select. However, in Italy apparently the same thing happened on one machine as is now happening for you. We presumed that the setup must be broken on the Italian machine that was exhibiting the problem, apparently incorrectly. The other weird thing is that apparently only *some* fields have a problem and the others are OK. The code, though, for rendering all the fields is, however, identical. Any help or research you want to do would be very very welcome given the bizarre nature of the issue. Karl On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
downloaded binary .tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
.tar.gz, unpacked, checked md5 sum - everything is correct There is small error in README, it says that user need to switch to dist/example directory, while there is only example directory I run start.jar, and able to login to GUI, but in many places I see listconnections.ListOfRepositoryConnections instead of real text On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
Hi Shinichiro what tool are you using to create md5 files? Can you make these files compatible with md5sum -c ? On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
Hi, Alex I use gnupg 1.4.12(gnupg-w32cli-1.4.12.exe). I've checked checksum by command openssl md5. But sorry, I don't know if it can be compatible with md5sum. Shinichiro On 2012/04/05, at 20:18, Alex Ott wrote: Hi Shinichiro what tool are you using to create md5 files? Can you make these files compatible with md5sum -c ? On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- With best wishes,Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
Found a technical problem already. The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target. CONNECTORS-451. This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix. Any disagreement? Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
Found what I think is a blocker. CONNECTORS-452. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Found a technical problem already. The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target. CONNECTORS-451. This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix. Any disagreement? Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
Pulled up a fix. Looks like we'll need another RC - but first let's wait for feedback from the incubator about the legal license/notice/etc files. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Found what I think is a blocker. CONNECTORS-452. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Found a technical problem already. The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target. CONNECTORS-451. This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix. Any disagreement? Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
I haven't heard anything back from the incubator folks, but I did find and pull up fixes to two blocking tickets. So I suggest we withdraw RC4 and build RC5, and call the vote. Thanks, Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Pulled up a fix. Looks like we'll need another RC - but first let's wait for feedback from the incubator about the legal license/notice/etc files. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Found what I think is a blocker. CONNECTORS-452. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Found a technical problem already. The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target. CONNECTORS-451. This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix. Any disagreement? Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC4
We withdraw RC4 and I'll create RC5 today. Shinichiro Abe On 2012/04/06, at 7:41, Karl Wright wrote: I haven't heard anything back from the incubator folks, but I did find and pull up fixes to two blocking tickets. So I suggest we withdraw RC4 and build RC5, and call the vote. Thanks, Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Pulled up a fix. Looks like we'll need another RC - but first let's wait for feedback from the incubator about the legal license/notice/etc files. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Found what I think is a blocker. CONNECTORS-452. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Found a technical problem already. The mvn-bootstrap scripts are no longer correct; they invoke the wrong ant target. CONNECTORS-451. This may not be a serious enough problem for a respin, but if we respin for another reason I think we should pull up the fix. Any disagreement? Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC4/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC4 fixed CONNECTORS-441 to CONNECTORS-448. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
Thanks, Abe-san, for doing this yet again. I'll download the RC now. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC5
Downloaded it, ran the binary using PostgreSQL, built it and ran the derby and hsqldb tests. All looks good (although I found a minor i18n error in the UI). +1 from me. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Abe-san, for doing this yet again. I'll download the RC now. Karl On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC5/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
I'll create RC4 tomorrow. Shinichiro Abe On 2012/04/03, at 23:38, Karl Wright wrote: Update: I'm just about ready to ask for a new RC that contains the following: - No checked-in binaries at all - A new XXX-lib target just containing license files and binaries - Patched jars built on the fly from patch files included in the source distribution In order to make all this work, the ant build has been extended with the following targets, which replace download-dependencies: make-core-deps (downloads and/or builds dependent jars and puts them in lib) make-deps (downloads proprietary jars) Thus, to build from source, you need to either: (1) Unpack source tar, unpack lib tar, and run ant build, or optionally ant make-deps build (2) Unpack source tar, run ant make-core-deps, and then either ant build or ant make-deps build If the make-core-deps target is objectionable, I can of course remove it from ant help so it is hidden. It's essential, though, for release engineering purposes. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: If this is the next thing the community wants to try, I won't stand in the way. I just got the impression that there's more wrong with our build than just including dependent binaries - we also have problems with the dependent binaries themselves in some cases. Nevertheless, should I call a vote on (say) reverting to RC1 and applying the stated shell commands to the resulting artifacts? The commands should also include .wsp files as well as jars, but that is a minor issue. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Possible solutions include: There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier: (5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437 source tree to a separate -lib package like this: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar' lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt lib.txt $ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source release and include build instructions like the following: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz $ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating $ ant build That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled would make sense even regardless of policy requirements. BR, Jukka Zitting
[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245062#comment-13245062 ] Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443: --- Here the two dependencies URLs for the Alfresco Connector that are not in public Maven repositories: * http://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-open-mirror/alfresco/HEAD/root/projects/3rd-party/lib/wss4j-1.5.4-patched.jar * http://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-open-mirror/alfresco/HEAD/root/projects/3rd-party/lib/opensaml-1.0.1.jar All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245094#comment-13245094 ] Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443: --- Here xmlsec: * http://svn.alfresco.com/repos/alfresco-open-mirror/alfresco/HEAD/root/projects/3rd-party/lib/xmlsec-1.4.1.jar All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245107#comment-13245107 ] Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443: --- Here the dependencies for H2 support: * http://clojars.org/repo/it/sk/alfresco/h2-support/1.1/h2-support-1.1.jar * http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/h2database/h2/1.3.158/h2-1.3.158.jar All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245131#comment-13245131 ] Piergiorgio Lucidi commented on CONNECTORS-443: --- Another here: * http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix/org.osgi.core/1.0.0/org.osgi.core-1.0.0.jar All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245258#comment-13245258 ] Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-443: Thanks to Piergiorgio, all downloads are now taken care of, so no Apache resource other than Maven is accessed when grabbing the dependent jars. The one exception is building the patched xerces and commons-httpclient jars, which check these projects out from tags in order to build. If tests pass, we may be ready for the next 0.5-incubating RC. All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Wright resolved CONNECTORS-443. Resolution: Fixed All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
Update: I'm just about ready to ask for a new RC that contains the following: - No checked-in binaries at all - A new XXX-lib target just containing license files and binaries - Patched jars built on the fly from patch files included in the source distribution In order to make all this work, the ant build has been extended with the following targets, which replace download-dependencies: make-core-deps (downloads and/or builds dependent jars and puts them in lib) make-deps (downloads proprietary jars) Thus, to build from source, you need to either: (1) Unpack source tar, unpack lib tar, and run ant build, or optionally ant make-deps build (2) Unpack source tar, run ant make-core-deps, and then either ant build or ant make-deps build If the make-core-deps target is objectionable, I can of course remove it from ant help so it is hidden. It's essential, though, for release engineering purposes. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: If this is the next thing the community wants to try, I won't stand in the way. I just got the impression that there's more wrong with our build than just including dependent binaries - we also have problems with the dependent binaries themselves in some cases. Nevertheless, should I call a vote on (say) reverting to RC1 and applying the stated shell commands to the resulting artifacts? The commands should also include .wsp files as well as jars, but that is a minor issue. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Possible solutions include: There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier: (5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437 source tree to a separate -lib package like this: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar' lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt lib.txt $ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source release and include build instructions like the following: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz $ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating $ ant build That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled would make sense even regardless of policy requirements. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2
Ok, should be fixed. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Those files should not be there; it's probably a result of a missing exclude in the build.xml. I'll open a ticket and look at it. Thanks! Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: I found jar files in -src.zip and -src.tar.gz ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-3.x-plugin.jar ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-4.x-plugin.jar Should these files be removed? Shinichiro Abe On 2012/04/02, at 13:10, Shinichiro Abe wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC2 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no binary files are included in the source distribution. All of them are now downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2
Thank you. I'm going to create RC3. Shinichiro Abe On 2012/04/02, at 18:27, Karl Wright wrote: Ok, should be fixed. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Those files should not be there; it's probably a result of a missing exclude in the build.xml. I'll open a ticket and look at it. Thanks! Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: I found jar files in -src.zip and -src.tar.gz ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-3.x-plugin.jar ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-4.x-plugin.jar Should these files be removed? Shinichiro Abe On 2012/04/02, at 13:10, Shinichiro Abe wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC2 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no binary files are included in the source distribution. All of them are now downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC3 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external sources. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
+1 from me I've already checked signatures. Shinichiro Abe On 2012/04/02, at 20:07, Shinichiro Abe wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC3 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external sources. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
Hi Abe-san, The bin packages look much smaller than the ones I built here when I was testing things out. Did you remember to include the proprietary materials before you built the RC? I'm about to unpack the bin.zip to see if my suspicion is warranted... Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC3 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external sources. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
At first glance it looks like the bin packages are complete; apparently I must have inadvertantly included something else in my bin packages when I built them (they were 175M each). Trying it out now... Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Abe-san, The bin packages look much smaller than the ones I built here when I was testing things out. Did you remember to include the proprietary materials before you built the RC? I'm about to unpack the bin.zip to see if my suspicion is warranted... Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC3 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external sources. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
I checked out the bin.zip package; all looked good. I opened one ticket about a minor problem (CONNECTORS-442) which is that the bin packages include ant and maven build scripts, but that's not enough to block release. The only other potential problem is that the license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to incubator guidelines. Specifically, we are not including a different set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr) is still acceptable or not. The thread in general@i.a.o provided some examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable formats. I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we present this artifact to the incubator. Otherwise, +1 from me. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: At first glance it looks like the bin packages are complete; apparently I must have inadvertantly included something else in my bin packages when I built them (they were 175M each). Trying it out now... Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Abe-san, The bin packages look much smaller than the ones I built here when I was testing things out. Did you remember to include the proprietary materials before you built the RC? I'm about to unpack the bin.zip to see if my suspicion is warranted... Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC3/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC3 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-440: Build should exclude integration content from external sources. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: The only other potential problem is that the license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to incubator guidelines. Specifically, we are not including a different set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr) is still acceptable or not. The thread in general@i.a.o provided some examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable formats. I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we present this artifact to the incubator. Ideally the licensing metadata (i.e. the LICENSE and NOTICE files) should only cover material contained in that specific package. See [1] for a related discussion from a few years ago. At least back then it seemed acceptable for a project to also only maintain a single set of license metadata that covers the contents of both source and binary distributions. AFAIUI that approach is in use by many Apache projects. About the RC more generally, I find the download-via-svn target a bit troublesome as it makes the release depend on content in svn. That essentially turns the svn server into a release distribution channel, which it definitely shouldn't be. I think it's fine to manage the set of binary dependencies (that aren't available in a stable third party location like Maven Central) in svn, but a release should not try to access them from there. Instead we should for example package them up in a separate -lib or -deps archive and make it available for download along with the source release through the standard Apache mirroring network. That archive should also come with appropriate licensing metadata that's currently lacking in bin-dist. [1] http://markmail.org/message/bttmkavpicxxg7gl BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
My major concern with the release of binaries through the standard Apache channel is that we then effectively have another release that must be synchronized with the main release, since the non-maven binaries are not, by definition, part of the main release. I set bin-dist up with that in mind, so that it can effectively remain unversioned, and be add only. If there is no other choice than parallel releases of binaries and source, with a separation of binaries and source in the svn tree, then I will have to think through the best solution. Certainly we will have to treat binaries from different sources differently. For example, all of the following would potentially need a different solution: (1) Stuff that's available from maven that is license-compatible with Apache (2) Stuff that's available from maven that is NOT license-compatible with Apache (3) Stuff that's not available from maven that is license-compatible with Apache (4) Stuff that's not available from maven that is not license-compatible with Apache We could not package dependencies that are (2) or (4). We would *have* to package (3), but not necessarily (1). Is this making your head spin yet? Mine is... An svn-based download is technically little different than a source checkout, seems to me, which is why I wonder why we would make a distinction at all. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: The only other potential problem is that the license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to incubator guidelines. Specifically, we are not including a different set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr) is still acceptable or not. The thread in general@i.a.o provided some examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable formats. I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we present this artifact to the incubator. Ideally the licensing metadata (i.e. the LICENSE and NOTICE files) should only cover material contained in that specific package. See [1] for a related discussion from a few years ago. At least back then it seemed acceptable for a project to also only maintain a single set of license metadata that covers the contents of both source and binary distributions. AFAIUI that approach is in use by many Apache projects. About the RC more generally, I find the download-via-svn target a bit troublesome as it makes the release depend on content in svn. That essentially turns the svn server into a release distribution channel, which it definitely shouldn't be. I think it's fine to manage the set of binary dependencies (that aren't available in a stable third party location like Maven Central) in svn, but a release should not try to access them from there. Instead we should for example package them up in a separate -lib or -deps archive and make it available for download along with the source release through the standard Apache mirroring network. That archive should also come with appropriate licensing metadata that's currently lacking in bin-dist. [1] http://markmail.org/message/bttmkavpicxxg7gl BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
Hi folks, As for the last pile of revisions, which download dependencies from Maven or SVN depending, Jukka and I agreed that we'll also need either a dependencies artifact or a source + dependencies artifact. How we get the dependencies in the first place, though, is still unclear, so we decided to put the question to infrastruct...@apache.org to find out their opinion of whether downloading binaries from svn was acceptable. I did not get a clear answer to that, but I can say the following: (1) There is a clear level of discomfort about storing ANY binaries in apache infrastructure. (2) For patched dependent releases, the recommended process is to download source tar/zip, unpack it, apply patches, and build it, all as part of the build process for the main release. (3) For those releases that simply do not exist at all in Maven, the ideal process is to download the sources and build them. The problems, then, are as follows: (1) ManifoldCF binary distributions include packages which can only be built on specific architectures. For example, the SharePoint 3.0 mcf plugin. (2) Patching of source cannot be done in a standard way on both Windows and Linux, other than within an SVN checkout (via svn patch). (3) There may be some binary dependencies whose sources are hard to get hold of, e.g. jdbcpool-0.99.jar, which are also not found in Maven. Possible solutions include: (1) Only patch sources that we can check out via svn. This implies that, during the build process, instead of checking out a single binary, we check out an entire source tree. Then we can apply the patch. Downside: svn access required during build. (2) Remove the dependency on anything we find we can't get the sources for, such as jdbcpool-0.99. Downside: requires significant code changes. (3) Check in the binaries for all platform-dependent builds into googlecode. Downside: Not clear whether the Incubator will consider this reasonable. (4) Require that builds only take place on Windows machines with appropriate Windows tools and upstream dependencies installed. Downside: Essentially a non-starter. Obviously all of this will greatly complicate the build and release process for ManifoldCF, if indeed there is exists an acceptable solution at all. I honestly don't have a workable answer in mind at this point for all of the new constraints we're dealing with. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: My major concern with the release of binaries through the standard Apache channel is that we then effectively have another release that must be synchronized with the main release, since the non-maven binaries are not, by definition, part of the main release. I set bin-dist up with that in mind, so that it can effectively remain unversioned, and be add only. If there is no other choice than parallel releases of binaries and source, with a separation of binaries and source in the svn tree, then I will have to think through the best solution. Certainly we will have to treat binaries from different sources differently. For example, all of the following would potentially need a different solution: (1) Stuff that's available from maven that is license-compatible with Apache (2) Stuff that's available from maven that is NOT license-compatible with Apache (3) Stuff that's not available from maven that is license-compatible with Apache (4) Stuff that's not available from maven that is not license-compatible with Apache We could not package dependencies that are (2) or (4). We would *have* to package (3), but not necessarily (1). Is this making your head spin yet? Mine is... An svn-based download is technically little different than a source checkout, seems to me, which is why I wonder why we would make a distinction at all. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: The only other potential problem is that the license/notice/dependencies files may not conform strictly to incubator guidelines. Specifically, we are not including a different set of files with a bin release vs. a source release, and also it was unclear whether our format (which was once again based on Lucene/Solr) is still acceptable or not. The thread in general@i.a.o provided some examples, but it is not clear whether those were the ONLY acceptable formats. I am hoping for Jukka and Tommaso's feedback here before we present this artifact to the incubator. Ideally the licensing metadata (i.e. the LICENSE and NOTICE files) should only cover material contained in that specific package. See [1] for a related discussion from a few years ago. At least back then it seemed acceptable for a project to also only maintain a single set of license metadata that covers the contents of both source and binary distributions. AFAIUI that approach is in use by many Apache projects
[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244493#comment-13244493 ] Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-443: Another complication is other Apache Java projects which have patched jars in their dependencies. Apache Chemistry has a couple, I believe, and we have a CMIS connector. All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Possible solutions include: There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier: (5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437 source tree to a separate -lib package like this: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar' lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt lib.txt $ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source release and include build instructions like the following: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz $ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating $ ant build That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled would make sense even regardless of policy requirements. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC3
If this is the next thing the community wants to try, I won't stand in the way. I just got the impression that there's more wrong with our build than just including dependent binaries - we also have problems with the dependent binaries themselves in some cases. Nevertheless, should I call a vote on (say) reverting to RC1 and applying the stated shell commands to the resulting artifacts? The commands should also include .wsp files as well as jars, but that is a minor issue. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Possible solutions include: There's also the alternative that I brought up earlier: (5) Extract all dependencies from the existing pre-CONNECTORS-437 source tree to a separate -lib package like this: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ find apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating -type f -name '*.jar' lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/LICENSE.txt lib.txt $ echo apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating/NOTICE.txt lib.txt $ tar zcf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz -T lib.txt We can then publish that -lib package along with the official source release and include build instructions like the following: $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-src.tar.gz $ tar zxf apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-lib.tar.gz $ cd apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating $ ant build That gives us something that's immediately releasable even with the newly reinterpreted Apache rules. And it gives us more time and breathing room for following up on the various improvement ideas that in terms of simplifying the build and the way dependencies are handled would make sense even regardless of policy requirements. BR, Jukka Zitting
[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-443) All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244788#comment-13244788 ] Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-443: For jetty, it looks like the right answer might be to move to Jetty 7, since that supposedly fixes the problems. Jetty 6 builds with Maven, which definitely would complicate the build even further by providing yet more build dependencies. Hopefully the port won't be too painful. All patched jars must be built within ManifoldCF release process Key: CONNECTORS-443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-443 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Build Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Blocker Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Downloading already-built patched jars is not permissible within Apache any longer. The fix to this will entail downloading source and patching that as part of the build process. In order for the build process to succeed on Windows, this currently means that the sources must be checked out using svn. The following changes will therefore need to occur under this ticket: (1) Apache binaries that are available as releases but which are not in Maven should be downloaded and unpacked from http://archive.apache.org/dist. This will include the solr and sharepoint mcf plugins. (2) The download-dependencies target must be split into download-dependencies and download-proprietary-dependencies. The download-dependencies target will become responsible for downloading, patching, and building the non-proprietary packages. Packages that will need to be checked out by this target from svn include: httpclient 3.1, xerces 2.9.1, hsqldb 2.2.8, and jetty 6.1.26. (3) A new release artifact, XXX-dep.zip/tar.gz, will be produced which will contain all the dependency binaries. (4) Any non-sourceable dependency binaries we find must be replaced with a sourced equivalent, or code for it developed from scratch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC1
HI, I close RC1 for CONNECTORS-437 regarding embedded jar files in the source. I'll create RC2 today. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/03/27, at 15:55, Piergiorgio Lucidi wrote: I tried to use the binary distribution starting some jobs with CMIS and ElasticSearch. +1 from me. Piergiorgio Il giorno 27 marzo 2012 04:00, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.comha scritto: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC1/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC1 fixed the following issues by IPMC requests: 1. CONNECTORS-434: Describe which licenses we select for our dual-licensed jars.(LICENSE.txt) 2. CONNECTORS-433: Update copyright date.(NOTICE.txt) 3. My code signing Key is available online. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2
Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC2 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no binary files are included in the source distribution. All of them are now downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC2
I found jar files in -src.zip and -src.tar.gz ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-3.x-plugin.jar ./connectors/solr/integration/mcf-solr-4.x-plugin.jar Should these files be removed? Shinichiro Abe On 2012/04/02, at 13:10, Shinichiro Abe wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC2/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC2 fixed the following issues: CONNECTORS-437: Change the ant jar distribution model so that no binary files are included in the source distribution. All of them are now downloaded via the ant download-dependencies target. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-438) Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the mirror - the rest should point to the archive
Only the current release should be referred to by the documentation on the mirror - the rest should point to the archive Key: CONNECTORS-438 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-438 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Documentation Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.6 Reporter: Karl Wright Assignee: Karl Wright Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.6 The download page should refer to only the current release via the mirror. All older releases should refer to http://archive.apache.org/dist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC1
Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC1/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC1 fixed the following issues by IPMC requests: 1. CONNECTORS-434: Describe which licenses we select for our dual-licensed jars.(LICENSE.txt) 2. CONNECTORS-433: Update copyright date.(NOTICE.txt) 3. My code signing Key is available online. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC1
Checked the changes, and made sure that the binary distribution runs. +1 from me. Karl On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifoldcf-0.5-incubating-RC1/ and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. RC1 fixed the following issues by IPMC requests: 1. CONNECTORS-434: Describe which licenses we select for our dual-licensed jars.(LICENSE.txt) 2. CONNECTORS-433: Update copyright date.(NOTICE.txt) 3. My code signing Key is available online. I've already checked signatures. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe
[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0
Three +1's. 72 hours. Vote passes! Next, I need to open a vote in gene...@incubator.apache.org Thank you everyone. Shinichiro Abe On 2012/03/22, at 18:55, Piergiorgio Lucidi wrote: I checked signatures and I used the application from the binary package. +1 from me Piergiorgio Il 22 marzo 2012 02:27, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto: Signatures look good. +1 from me. Karl On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: + 1 from me Shinichiro Abe On 2012/03/22, at 2:24, Karl Wright wrote: Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys and signatures. Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready... Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0
Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys and signatures. Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready... Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0
+1 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys and signatures. Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready... Karl -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0
+ 1 from me Shinichiro Abe On 2012/03/22, at 2:24, Karl Wright wrote: Calling the vote... while still waiting for verification of the keys and signatures. Vote +1 if you think the 0.5 release is ready... Karl
Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?
On 19.03.12 20.33, Karl Wright wrote: Hi all, I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was scheduled for 0.5-incubating. Since the day is rapidly approaching when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's plate for the next release. The tickets in question are CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404. +1 from me for postponing. Karl +1 -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?
+1 from me. Piergiorgio Il 19 marzo 2012 20:33, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi all, I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was scheduled for 0.5-incubating. Since the day is rapidly approaching when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's plate for the next release. The tickets in question are CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404. +1 from me for postponing. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?
Ok, I've postponed. Piergiorgio, do you still intend to generate Japanese screenshots for the ElasticSearch connector documentation? If not we should postpone that ticket as well. Karl On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: +1 from me. Piergiorgio Il 19 marzo 2012 20:33, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi all, I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was scheduled for 0.5-incubating. Since the day is rapidly approaching when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's plate for the next release. The tickets in question are CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404. +1 from me for postponing. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?
I would like to work on Japanese screenshots. Give me an hour. Piergiorgio Il 20 marzo 2012 13:18, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto: Ok, I've postponed. Piergiorgio, do you still intend to generate Japanese screenshots for the ElasticSearch connector documentation? If not we should postpone that ticket as well. Karl On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: +1 from me. Piergiorgio Il 19 marzo 2012 20:33, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi all, I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was scheduled for 0.5-incubating. Since the day is rapidly approaching when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's plate for the next release. The tickets in question are CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404. +1 from me for postponing. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?
Hi all, I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was scheduled for 0.5-incubating. Since the day is rapidly approaching when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's plate for the next release. The tickets in question are CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404. +1 from me for postponing. Karl
Re: Postpone localization tickets for 0.5 release?
+1 Shinichiro On 2012/03/20, at 4:33, Karl Wright wrote: Hi all, I've not heard anything from Hitoshi Ozawa about whether he will be able to complete some of the Japanese localization work that was scheduled for 0.5-incubating. Since the day is rapidly approaching when we have to spin the first RC, I'd like a show of hands as to whether we should postpone the two tickets currently on Hitoshi's plate for the next release. The tickets in question are CONNECTORS-394 and CONNECTORS-404. +1 from me for postponing. Karl
Re: Release time is upon us once again
Hi Karl, Il 14 marzo 2012 00:44, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi fellow developers, Our next release date is rapidly approaching. We've been releasing a version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away. There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs. Two are Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search connector. The latter is unassigned. Please finish these up as quickly as possible! I'll try to work on this last issue during these days and I'll let you know the progress commenting on JIRA ;) Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until now. Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating? I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all of my Windows-based scripts. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: Release time is upon us once again
Hi. I want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating. I use Mac OS, but please teach me some ways if I can work. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/03/14, at 8:44, Karl Wright wrote: Hi fellow developers, Our next release date is rapidly approaching. We've been releasing a version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away. There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs. Two are Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search connector. The latter is unassigned. Please finish these up as quickly as possible! Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until now. Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating? I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all of my Windows-based scripts. Karl
Re: Release time is upon us once again
Great, and thanks for volunteering! The first thing to do create your key and add it to the KEYS file in the project (if not already there), and add it to the Web of Trust. The necessary steps are listed here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing I urge you to follow these instructions carefully; getting this right is the hardest part of becoming a release engineer. ;-) The second part involves the release itself. I have a number of Windows scripts that are useful for releases, which I will get into some kind of order and commit to svn. You will probably want to create Linux equivalents. Please keep me informed as to how it is going. Karl On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating. I use Mac OS, but please teach me some ways if I can work. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/03/14, at 8:44, Karl Wright wrote: Hi fellow developers, Our next release date is rapidly approaching. We've been releasing a version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away. There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs. Two are Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search connector. The latter is unassigned. Please finish these up as quickly as possible! Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until now. Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating? I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all of my Windows-based scripts. Karl
Re: Release time is upon us once again
I checked in my scripts into: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/release-scripts. Once you read the Apache instructions, you might want to look at my scripts to see how they fit in. Essentially, they build the release candidates, sign them, and upload them (hardwired to go to my account on people.apache.org, unfortunately - which I need to fix). Thanks, Karl On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Great, and thanks for volunteering! The first thing to do create your key and add it to the KEYS file in the project (if not already there), and add it to the Web of Trust. The necessary steps are listed here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing I urge you to follow these instructions carefully; getting this right is the hardest part of becoming a release engineer. ;-) The second part involves the release itself. I have a number of Windows scripts that are useful for releases, which I will get into some kind of order and commit to svn. You will probably want to create Linux equivalents. Please keep me informed as to how it is going. Karl On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating. I use Mac OS, but please teach me some ways if I can work. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2012/03/14, at 8:44, Karl Wright wrote: Hi fellow developers, Our next release date is rapidly approaching. We've been releasing a version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away. There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs. Two are Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search connector. The latter is unassigned. Please finish these up as quickly as possible! Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until now. Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating? I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all of my Windows-based scripts. Karl
Release time is upon us once again
Hi fellow developers, Our next release date is rapidly approaching. We've been releasing a version of ManifoldCF at roughly the end of every quarter for a year now, and March 31 is a bit over two weeks away. There are currently three outstanding 0.5-incubating bugs. Two are Japanese localization tickets, and one is for the new Elastic Search connector. The latter is unassigned. Please finish these up as quickly as possible! Finally, I've been the Release Manager for all four releases up until now. Does anyone want to volunteer to be Release Manager for 0.5-incubating? I'd be happy to provide assistance and check in all of my Windows-based scripts. Karl
[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-418) Re-examine the call to the non-published method on the next release of OpenCMIS
Re-examine the call to the non-published method on the next release of OpenCMIS --- Key: CONNECTORS-418 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-418 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: CMIS connector Reporter: Piergiorgio Lucidi Assignee: Piergiorgio Lucidi We have to re-examine the way that we are using to retrieve the document uri (content stream). Now we are using a way suggested by Florian Muller but it seems that it could be the possibility of a future public method in the OpenCMIS API. Here the link of the suggestion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-chemistry-dev/201009.mbox/%3c13092343.447851284629268276.javamail.r...@zimbra.alfresco.com%3E -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-399) Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information
Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information Key: CONNECTORS-399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Improvement Components: Documentation Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Hitoshi Ozawa Priority: Trivial Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Japanese site needs to be updated to contain release 0.4 information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Assigned] (CONNECTORS-399) Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Wright reassigned CONNECTORS-399: -- Assignee: Karl Wright Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information Key: CONNECTORS-399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Improvement Components: Documentation Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Hitoshi Ozawa Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Trivial Labels: I18N Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Attachments: CONNECTORS-399.patch Japanese site needs to be updated to contain release 0.4 information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira