Re: [Cooker] Gnome Control Center/Sawfish config

2002-01-22 Thread Nelson Bartley

Good Call!

apprently I had inadvertantly changed the ownership of that directory to
root by accident. wierd.

Thanks,
NB

On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 21:52, mige harimurti wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have the same case here.
> This was during user maintainance. I deleted and re-create some users.
> 
> The fastest way to duplicate this case is to change the owner of the 
> /tmp/.sawfish-username with other user.
> E.g. in the /tmp :
>  .. user1   user1   .sawfish-user1
> 
> $ chown user2:user2 .sawfish-user1
> 
> then login as user1 with Session type Gnome with Sawfish WM.
> 
> Other similar problem is the /tmp/.esd.
> 
> Regards,
> Mige
> 
> Frederic Crozat wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 03:19:05 +0100, Nelson Bartley wrote:
> >
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>I downloaded the "Plus" pack for the latest gnome config center, and it
> >>has a whole bunch of options in it for customizing sawfish. Funny thing
> >>is that all the config tools all tell me that sawfish isn't running.
> >>
> >>Now I really want to configure sawfish cuz I sellected the ugliest theme
> >>of all time to use w/ it. At any rate, I know sawfish is running cuz
> >>it's listed in ps -A, so does anyone have any ideas.
> >>
> >
> >How did you start your GNOME session ?
> >Could you also post your ~/.gnome/default.wm ? 
> >
> >I'm interested because I've seen reports of this bug but I've never been 
> >able to duplicate it..
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 






Re: [Cooker] PATCH: Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!

2002-01-22 Thread Pixel

Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > chmouel, maybe we can let installkernel do the initrd. After building the
> > initrd, installkernel could check the existence of lilo.conf or menu.lst and
> > leave if none exist (meaning we're at install time). ?
> 
> Something like that is ok for you ?

[...]

>  [[ -n $AUTODETECT ]] && [[ -z $LOADER ]] && [[ -f /usr/sbin/detectloader ]] && 
>LOADER=$(/usr/sbin/detectloader -q)

humf, i would better not have detectloader called during install. But it could do

>  
>  [[ $LOADER != "LILO" && $LOADER != "GRUB" && $LOADER != "YABOOT" ]] && {
> +[[ -n $DURING_INSTALL ]] && exit 0 #DURING_INSTALL it could be
> + #possible that there is no loader
>  cat <&2




Re: [Cooker] PATCH: Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!

2002-01-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> chmouel, maybe we can let installkernel do the initrd. After building the
> initrd, installkernel could check the existence of lilo.conf or menu.lst and
> leave if none exist (meaning we're at install time). ?

Something like that is ok for you ?

--- installkernel.~1.32.~   Mon Jan  7 16:52:43 2002
+++ installkernel   Tue Jan 22 20:43:08 2002
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
 NOCONFIG=""
 NOENTRY=""
 
-[[ -n "$DURING_INSTALL" ]] && exit 0
-
 if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/installkernel ];then
 source /etc/sysconfig/installkernel
 fi
@@ -159,6 +157,8 @@
 [[ -n $AUTODETECT ]] && [[ -z $LOADER ]] && [[ -f /usr/sbin/detectloader ]] && 
LOADER=$(/usr/sbin/detectloader -q)
 
 [[ $LOADER != "LILO" && $LOADER != "GRUB" && $LOADER != "YABOOT" ]] && {
+[[ -n $DURING_INSTALL ]] && exit 0 #DURING_INSTALL it could be
+   #possible that there is no loader
 cat <&2
 Cannot find a boot loader, you may have to see why detectloader has
 problems or specify via the command line.
@@ -169,10 +169,12 @@
 if [[ -x /usr/bin/perl && -z $NOENTRY ]];then
 
 if [[ $LOADER = "GRUB" ]] && [[ -f $sharfile/grub ]];then
+   [[ -f /boot/grub/menu.lst ]] || exit 0
perl $sharfile/grub $REMOVE $version
 fi
 
 if [[ $LOADER = "LILO" ]] && [[ -f $sharfile/lilo ]];then
+   [[ -f /etc/lilo.conf ]] || exit 0
perl $sharfile/lilo $NOLAUNCH $REMOVE $version
 fi
 


-- 
http://www.chmouel.org/




Re: [Cooker] PATCH: Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!

2002-01-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> chmouel, maybe we can let installkernel do the initrd. After building the
> initrd, installkernel could check the existence of lilo.conf or menu.lst and
> leave if none exist (meaning we're at install time). ?

Good idea Will be done.

-- 
http://www.chmouel.org/




Re: [Cooker] Lilo on 7 entries, and ugly to

2002-01-22 Thread andre

> 
> andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > So if i copy the message file from 8.0 it will be displayed as it was in
> > 8.0
> 
> Yes, but re-run lilo for changes to be valid.
> 
> François.
> 
And is there also somewhere information on how to make a message file?




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mutt-1.3.26i-1mdk

2002-01-22 Thread Geoffrey Lee

> | 
> | Hmm, what do you mean when "colors are setup inverse"?
> 
> I have colors set up in my .muttrc.
> 
> For example:
> color normalblue   default
> color message   white  default
> color quotedmagentadefault
> 

Ok. Got it to reproduce.

Hmm .. I don't know what I'm going to do about this one ... it's obviously
ugly. The way that I see it, I think that not having color support in your
case (try setting another color other than default?) is less serious than
not even being able view the program in a terminal program in X at all.

Note that it might (not sure) be able to be solved by changing the color scheme 
aka patching /etc/Muttrc  for the ncurses problem, but I really don't want
to do this because I've seen this problem in at least one other ncurses
based program [1] so I don't want to throw in just one random fix for
the mutt program ..

- G.


[1] see prozilla






Re: [Cooker] PATCH: Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!

2002-01-22 Thread Pixel

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> > One such scriplet is the /sbin/installkernel one.
> > 
> > So grpmi setting DURING_INSTALL causes /sbin/installkernel to exit without
> > doing anything.
> > 
> 
> Oh! :(
> 
> Chmouel, is there any reason for this?

quite simple, at install, DrakX is the boss and installkernel should not do
things on its own ;p

this could change, drakx could stop building the initrd and rely on
installkernel for this.

chmouel, maybe we can let installkernel do the initrd. After building the
initrd, installkernel could check the existence of lilo.conf or menu.lst and
leave if none exist (meaning we're at install time). ?





Re: [Cooker] Lilo on 7 entries, and ugly to

2002-01-22 Thread François Pons

andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> So if i copy the message file from 8.0 it will be displayed as it was in
> 8.0

Yes, but re-run lilo for changes to be valid.

François.




Re: [Cooker] PATCH: Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!

2002-01-22 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

On ÷ÔÒ, 2002-01-22 at 14:21, Pixel wrote:
> Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > > agreed, using DURING_INSTALL for this seems a bad idea.
> > > 
> > > we'd better run ldconfig and update-menus than dropping a few other things
> > > done in %post's.
> > > 
> > > maybe we could have another (different) way of skipping ldconfig and
> > > update-menus...
> > > 
> > 
> > I don't think setting DURING_INSTALL removed the execution of
> > scriplets. It should be something else because there is nothing in rpm
> > in that way...
> 
> the message "Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!" is wrong.
> 
> The problem is that setting DURING_INSTALL disable the execution of *some*
> scriplets, those which have:
> 
> if [ -z "$DURING_INSTALL" ]; then
>   ...
> fi
> 
> One such scriplet is the /sbin/installkernel one.
> 
> So grpmi setting DURING_INSTALL causes /sbin/installkernel to exit without
> doing anything.
> 

Oh! :(

Chmouel, is there any reason for this?

-andrej





Re: [Cooker] gawk-3.1.0-2mdk.i586.rpm is broken

2002-01-22 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne

On 20 Jan 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> I passed the problem to our gcc packager and I'm packaging a
> slightly patched version of gawk in the meantime.

OK, fixed in -72mdk.

Bye,
Gwenole.





Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1

2002-01-22 Thread Thierry Vignaud

Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell
> > me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using ".tar" files?
> > thanks
> >
> > this is required by Mplayer for example.
> False, you can compile mplayer with 2.96 without problems.

yes but new binutils breaks cvs build.





[Cooker] On Euro

2002-01-22 Thread Peter Ruskin

OK, I press  on the console and get the Euro displayed.
Then I enter "echo ¤ | lp" and what comes out of the printer is the 
currency symbol, no Euro.

Using CUPS with HP DeskJet 720C.
-- 
Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, Wales.  AMD Athlon XP 1600+, 512MB RAM.
Registered Linux User 219434 ( see http://counter.li.org/ ).
Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586
Kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk-win4lin,  XFree86 4.1.0, patch level 21mdk.
KDE: 2.2.2.  Qt: 2.3.2.  Up 2 hours 52 minutes.
---




[Cooker] urpmi --mediums

2002-01-22 Thread RA


 urpmi medium was not accessable, so I created a further cooker 
medium from another ftp mirror and tried to take  from ,
but
$ urpmi --mediums  

tries to get it from !

$ rpm -q urpmi rpmtools
urpmi-3.2-2mdk
rpmtools-4.0-7mdk
$




Re: [Cooker] Lilo on 7 entries, and ugly to

2002-01-22 Thread andre

Op di 22-01-2002, om 17:58 schreef François Pons:
> andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > The new lilo shows only 7 entries for me and that is used to few for me.
> > Could we go back to the previous version. It looked also better
> 
> Everything is in the message file itself, if you drop it (or change it with
> another version) it will be correct.

So if i copy the message file from 8.0 it will be displayed as it was in
8.0




Re: [Cooker] Problem with urpmi

2002-01-22 Thread François Pons

"Patrick Mullaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> It is probably just me not having a great grasp of the program, but I
> constantly get:
> 
>   "found requires on file not yet found" displayed whenever I do a
> urpmi.update
> 
> Can anyone, in 1 words or less, =), let me know if this is normal or if
> it is something that needs to be fixed?

This is problably normal if you don't have replaced your default medium and not
installed cooker for some time ?

Which version do you have of urpmi and rpmtools ?

François.




Re: [Cooker] Rsync cooker

2002-01-22 Thread Dave Seff

You got it. 
-Dave


On Tuesday 22 January 2002 10:41, you wrote:
> so my commandline would be
> rsync -av --delete ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586 /home/cooker
>
> for example?
>
> /MattB
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Seff
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rsync cooker
>
>
> Yes, by adding --delete to your rsync command. It will remove the older
> files
> and make sure that your directory matches exactly with the remote server's
> directory. Use with care, because if the Mandrake team decides to change
> the dir structure it could wipe out your entire directory.
>
> -Dave
>
> On Tuesday 22 January 2002 09:35, you wrote:
> > I have tried to rsync cooker from the sunet archive,
> > it took a whole night but thats ok hehe.
> >
> > But rsync doesn't remove the old file,
> > only adding the new filename. Is there any way to
> > get around this without having to manually go and remove
> > the old files?
> >
> > /MattB




Re: [Cooker] accessing cdrom causes segv

2002-01-22 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Vijay Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi.
> 
> After upgrading to 8.1 from 8.0, I recently tried to access the cdrom, by
> inserting a cd and going to /mnt/cdrom. This caused ls to segv and the
> following message was in /var/log/messages:

FYI this is not a support list for stable versions of Mandrake,
sorry.

Please go to

http://www.mandrakeexpert.com/


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




[Cooker] accessing cdrom causes segv

2002-01-22 Thread Vijay Ramachandran

Hi.

After upgrading to 8.1 from 8.0, I recently tried to access the cdrom, by
inserting a cd and going to /mnt/cdrom. This caused ls to segv and the
following message was in /var/log/messages:

Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: kernel BUG at super.c:274!
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: invalid operand: 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: CPU:0
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: EIP:
0010:[af_packet:__insmod_af_packet_O/lib/modules/2.4.8-26mdk/kernel/net/pac+-2089842/96]
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: EIP:0010:[]
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: eax: 001b   ebx: d7f7d720   ecx: c025dddc   edx: 
4e1e
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: esi:    edi: d7907c00   ebp: ff85   esp: 
cf0d3ec4
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: Process ls (pid: 11682, stackpage=cf0d3000)
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: Stack: d8a155ae 0112  c013bf4c d76d17c0 
0008 d6868260 d8a154c1 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel:d8a154cb d8a154d5 0286 c166f460 d6868260 
08056540 d7615760 d8a1507f 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel:d7907c00 0292 c1667d40  c1667d40 
d79da000 b6a8 c013c3eb 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: Call Trace: 
[af_packet:__insmod_af_packet_O/lib/modules/2.4.8-26mdk/kernel/net/pac+-2046546/96] 
[path_walk+1740/1968] 
[af_packet:__insmod_af_packet_O/lib/modules/2.4.8-26mdk/kernel/net/pac+-2046783/96] 
[af_packet:__insmod_af_packet_O/lib/modules/2.4.8-26mdk/kernel/net/pac+-2046773/96] 
[af_packet:__insmod_af_packet_O/lib/modules/2.4.8-26mdk/kernel/net/pac+-2046763/96] 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: Call Trace: [] [] [] 
[] [] 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel:
[af_packet:__insmod_af_packet_O/lib/modules/2.4.8-26mdk/kernel/net/pac+-2047873/96] 
[__user_walk+75/96] [vfs_lstat+98/144] [sys_lstat64+17/48] [request_module+224/416] 
[do_page_fault+0/1200] 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel:[] [] [] 
[] [] [] 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel:[error_code+56/64] [system_call+51/64] 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel:[] [] 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: 
Jan 22 08:34:29 saraswati kernel: Code: 0f 0b 59 5e 57 e8 d8 f9 ff ff 85 c0 89 44 24 
04 5a 74 4f 80 
The entire /mnt directory is not visible.

I do have a usb printer attached.

Any idea what's wrong? Is this a known problem, or should I report it as a
kernel bug? If so, to whom?

output of lspci:
[root@saraswati root]# lspci -vvv
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-751 [Irongate] System Controller 
(rev 23)
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- 
SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- Reset- FastB2B-

00:04.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super] (rev 14)
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686/A PCI to ISA Bridge
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping+ 
SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- TAbort- SERR- 
Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 1
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2- AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-


Output of lsmod:
[root@saraswati root]# lsm
lsmod lsmod.static  
[root@saraswati root]# lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
isofs  18496   0  (autoclean)
parport_pc 20240   1  (autoclean)
lp  5808   0  (autoclean)
parport24768   1  (autoclean) [parport_pc lp]
emu10k154320   0 
ac97_codec  9312   0  [emu10k1]
sound  58400   0  [emu10k1]
soundcore   4208   7  [emu10k1 sound]
af_packet  12560   1  (autoclean)
ip_vs  62000   0  (autoclean)
ipt_REJECT  3312   2  (autoclean)
ipt_limit   1280  11  (autoclean)
ipt_state944  13  (autoclean)
ipt_LOG 3776  11 
ip_conntrack_ftp3792   0  (unused)
iptable_mangle  2048   0  (autoclean) (unused)
printer 5920   0 
usb-uhci   21232   0  (unused)
usbcore50752   1  [printer usb-uhci]
8139too12704   1  (autoclean)
ne2k-pci5248   1  (autoclean)
83906432   0  (autoclean) [ne2k-pci]
iptable_filter  2048   0  (autoclean) (unused)
ipt_MASQUERADE  1600   1  (autoclean)
iptable_nat16560   0  [ipt_MASQUERADE]
ip_tables  11488  10  [ipt_REJECT ipt_limit ipt_state ipt_LOG 
iptable_mangle iptable_filter ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat]
ip_conntrack   15600   3  [ipt_state ip_co

[Cooker] problem woth dcopserver

2002-01-22 Thread Guillaume Rousse

When logging from KDM (runlevel 5): no active dcopserver found :-(
Works fine from runlevel 3.
kdebase-2.2.2-26mdk
-- 
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html




Re: [Cooker] Lilo on 7 entries, and ugly to

2002-01-22 Thread François Pons

andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The new lilo shows only 7 entries for me and that is used to few for me.
> Could we go back to the previous version. It looked also better

Everything is in the message file itself, if you drop it (or change it with
another version) it will be correct.

It will be fixed at least by allowing other entries to be displayed outside the
area defined for that.

There is currently no support for scrolling entries.

François.




[Cooker] Lilo on 7 entries, and ugly to

2002-01-22 Thread andre

The new lilo shows only 7 entries for me and that is used to few for me.
Could we go back to the previous version. It looked also better




Re: [Cooker] Rsync cooker

2002-01-22 Thread Kelley Terry

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:41:47 -0600
"tech at mathco dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> so my commandline would be
> rsync -av --delete ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586
/home/cooker> 
> for example?
> 
> /MattB

following the advice of using delete option with care, use the -n flag
first: rsync -avn --delete ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586
just to see if the mirror is ok or else be sure to back up your
directory first (that's my choice because I have room). 





> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Seff
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rsync cooker
> 
> 
> Yes, by adding --delete to your rsync command. It will remove the
older> files
> and make sure that your directory matches exactly with the remote
server's> directory. Use with care, because if the Mandrake team
decides to change the> dir structure it could wipe out your entire
directory.> 
> -Dave
> 
> On Tuesday 22 January 2002 09:35, you wrote:
> > I have tried to rsync cooker from the sunet archive,
> > it took a whole night but thats ok hehe.
> >
> > But rsync doesn't remove the old file,
> > only adding the new filename. Is there any way to
> > get around this without having to manually go and remove
> > the old files?
> >
> > /MattB
> 
> 
> 


-- 
It said use windows 95 or better so I loaded linux!
In a world without walls and fences who needs windows and gates?
Kelley Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




[Cooker] Gyach v0.7.5

2002-01-22 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD

Hi,

OK, so can't use gAIM.. figured I'd try Gyach for a bit.  Here's an 
interesting message:

Welcome vinnymeyer
error type=0x11 ,flag=0xfffb ,size=27
*** Danger Will Robinson!!!






Re: [Cooker] Need a very simple editor

2002-01-22 Thread andre

Op di 22-01-2002, om 13:29 schreef Fabrice FACORAT:
> le mar 22-01-2002 à 01:30, Yura Gusev a écrit :
> > On 21 Jan 2002, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> > 
> > > 1╟/ when fail to launch miserably and you have to edit config files by
> > > hand
> > 
> > newbee does not need to do this. He can use draxconf,wizdrake,linuxconf or
> > call for support.
> 
> My sentence was : when X fails miserably. sorry.
> For example DrakX misconfigured graphic card or there's a bug ( see the
> old one for nvidia cards ) and the newbie have to edit XF86Config by
> hand by following a friend/expert instructions
>  
Main reason to use a CLI editor is because use is simple when you have
su-ed to root or when you log on to a other computer. GUI editors on the
other hand need cookies and those are not always easy to set up




[Cooker] Problem with urpmi

2002-01-22 Thread Patrick Mullaley

It is probably just me not having a great grasp of the program, but I
constantly get:

"found requires on file not yet found" displayed whenever I do a
urpmi.update

Can anyone, in 1 words or less, =), let me know if this is normal or if
it is something that needs to be fixed?

Thanks,

Patrick





RE: [Cooker] Rsync cooker

2002-01-22 Thread tech at mathco dot com

so my commandline would be
rsync -av --delete ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586 /home/cooker

for example?

/MattB

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Seff
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rsync cooker


Yes, by adding --delete to your rsync command. It will remove the older
files
and make sure that your directory matches exactly with the remote server's
directory. Use with care, because if the Mandrake team decides to change the
dir structure it could wipe out your entire directory.

-Dave

On Tuesday 22 January 2002 09:35, you wrote:
> I have tried to rsync cooker from the sunet archive,
> it took a whole night but thats ok hehe.
>
> But rsync doesn't remove the old file,
> only adding the new filename. Is there any way to
> get around this without having to manually go and remove
> the old files?
>
> /MattB





Re: [Cooker] scanner does not work: problem with sane or devfs?

2002-01-22 Thread Yves Duret

Frederik Himpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Thank you, now it works perfectly. In /etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf was
> /dev/sga, I changed it to /dev/sg1. I was a bit surprised to read that
> there was a configuration file to edit, in Mandrake 8 it suffised to
> configure the SCSI-card and install sane.

the /dev entrie change their names times to times. it is very funny.
btw i will patch sane to have /dev/sg1 instead of /dev/sga it will be more
easier for every body
-- 
Yves Duret
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
piouk toujours et meme apres !





[Cooker] Re: Re: evolution bug/patch to allow specifying sendmail path

2002-01-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:15:33PM +0100, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> 
> And if it crash they will say : mdk heavily patch their softs with some
> bad things that may their apps unstable. ( ask someone from debian ).

Well, uhm, yeah.  The maintainer has to understand the patch and be in
agreement with the writer that it will not crash the application.
Don't forget, this is Cooker.  Things are allowed to crash
occasionally for the betterment of the distro.  That is what we are
all about here, no?

> examples ?

How about just going through the changelog for any reasonable number
of packages and you will find "patchXX removed, merged upstream".
In fact, I can give you an example of a patch that _I_ contributed to
perl-libwww-perl:

$ rpm -q --changelog perl-libwww-perl
* Tue Dec 18 2001 François Pons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5.63-2mdk

- added patch from Brian J. Murrell for HTTP POST of empty content.

...

b.


-- 
Brian J. Murrell




[Cooker] [rpm] knewspost & newspost

2002-01-22 Thread Marcel Pol


Hello,

I uploaded 2 rpms to /incoming.
They are also available on ftp://chaosmongers.org/Mandrake/Cooker/SRPMS


Name: knewspost 
Version : 1.0 
Release : 1mdk 
Description :
A Usenet binary poster for KDE.


Name: newspost 
Version : 1.13  
Release : 1mdk  
Description : 
Newspost is a usenet binary autoposter for unix.
Using newspost, it is a one command job to uuencode and post as many
binary files as you like to your favorite newsgroup.
It supports all the features you'd expect from a binary autoposter,
including authentication, posting to multiple newsgroups (crossposting),
and all the rest. And of course you can save your settings as default
so you don't have to type in your news server every time.


--
Marcel Pol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux 2.4.17-6mdksmp, up 3 days, 2:24





[Cooker] Rsync cooker

2002-01-22 Thread tech at mathco dot com

I have tried to rsync cooker from the sunet archive,
it took a whole night but thats ok hehe.

But rsync doesn't remove the old file,
only adding the new filename. Is there any way to
get around this without having to manually go and remove
the old files?

/MattB




Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Frederic Corne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> python is needed *only* by the new msec...
> 
> why the hell, have allowed someone to use python for that kind of
> package ??

Because our Core System leader, Frederic Lepied, coded it himself
:-). And because originally it was not meant for inclusion in
distro.



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Re: evolution bug/patch to allow specifying sendmailpath

2002-01-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> > We seem to add all kinds of
>> > "feature adding non-vendor" patches to other packages, 
>> examples ?
> Kernel

Kernel is something completely different than the others
packages Don't take it as example.

-- 
http://www.chmouel.org/




Re: [Cooker] Rsync cooker

2002-01-22 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Tuesday 22 January 2002 15:35, you wrote:
> I have tried to rsync cooker from the sunet archive,
> it took a whole night but thats ok hehe.
>
> But rsync doesn't remove the old file,
> only adding the new filename. Is there any way to
> get around this without having to manually go and remove
> the old files?
>
> /MattB

Use the -u and --delete flags

-- 

Frederic Bastok
Co-Founder




Re: [Cooker] Re: evolution bug/patch to allow specifying sendmailpath

2002-01-22 Thread Brad Felmey

On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 06:15, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> le mar 22-01-2002 à 11:59, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
>
> > We seem to add all kinds of
> > "feature adding non-vendor" patches to other packages, 
> 
> examples ?

Kernel
-- 
Brad Felmey





Re: [Cooker] locale

2002-01-22 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 2) Why do I have a /initrd in my /.

Look inside the directory ;-).

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Pixel

Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> > I agree ! But it seems that with the "basic_install" option nothing than 
> > the basic is installed ...
> 
> > eject
> > wget
> > perl-DateManip
> > perl-gettext
> > rpmtools
> 
> theses one are urpmi dependencies. I think really that's will be a very
> good idea to include urpmi in basic_install

I've renamed the various minimal installs to:

_("Truly minimal install (especially no urpmi)"),
_("Base system (no X, including urpmi)"),
_("With X"),

difference between the first 2 one are packages:

--
sndconfig awesfx sox playmidi 
  -> i lowered sndconfig, so these won't get installed anymore

urpmi curl eject perl-DateManip perl-gettext rpmtools libcurl2 libopenssl0
  -> needed for urpmi

ftp-client-krb5 krb5-libs 

bc readline

MAKEDEV anacron at cpio gpm hexedit ldetect mailx man-pages strace sudo 
--

tell me which one you find unneeded.




Re: [Cooker] Need a very simple editor

2002-01-22 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Pascal Terjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> We have the 2.54BETA22 (like SuSE and RedHat) but the current version is
> 2.54BETA30 (which is in Debian Woody and Sid).
> Is there a reason to keep this old version when some features have been
> added, or is this just a no more maintened package ?

In doubt, I've upgraded the package :-).
 

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Frederic Corne

Fabrice FACORAT wrote:

> le mar 22-01-2002 à 13:43, Frederic Corne a écrit :
> 
>>kudzu-0.99.23-4mdk
>>
> 
> thas still exist ? arf
> 


And my first command is "rpm -e kudzu"...


> 
>>libpython2.2-2.2-6mdk
>>
> 
> find python is very disturbing. thare was perl and now there's python
> 


python is needed *only* by the new msec...

why the hell, have allowed someone to use python for that kind of 
package ??

FC

 







Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Frederic Corne

Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> Frederic Corne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> 
>>it is on a vmware image (v2.0.4-1142) for a french keyboard.
>>install by nfs
>>VERSION :
>>Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020121 23:19
>>
>>using network.img
>>
>>- graphical install don't works, using "text" install (mode expert)
>>
> 
> Why? Anything in the logs? It's probably because under VMWare,
> the emulated video card doesn't support Vesa-2.0, right?
> 
> 

No I have instaled mdk 7.2 , 8.0 on vmware, *from* cdrom without 
problem. The graphical install was very nice.

with cooker network.img, it boots and then crashes in second stage and 
reboot.

I can redo it if you want , but said me what files and infos you want

FC











Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le mar 22-01-2002 à 13:43, Frederic Corne a écrit :
> Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> > that's why to my mind urpmi need to be installed by default. So you will
> > just have to install basesystem and after : urpmi sshd iptables
> >  
> 
> I agree ! But it seems that with the "basic_install" option nothing than 
> the basic is installed ...

> eject
> wget
> perl-DateManip
> perl-gettext
> rpmtools

theses one are urpmi dependencies. I think really that's will be a very
good idea to include urpmi in basic_install
 

> kudzu-0.99.23-4mdk

thas still exist ? arf

> libpython2.2-2.2-6mdk

find python is very disturbing. thare was perl and now there's python

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
- Le mariage est une lotterie.
- Faux ! A la lotterie, on a une chance de gagner !
- Lucky Luke par Morris





[Cooker] Kde and symlinks in documentation

2002-01-22 Thread Marcel Pol


Hello,

I am building a kde app from src.rpm.
I run into an rpmlint error:

W: knewspost dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knewspost/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
The symbolic link points nowhere.

W: knewspost symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knewspost/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common

The symlink does look ok to me, but I assume the error will not be there just to 
confuse me.
Here is an ls -l 
ls -l /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knewspost/common
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   29 Jan 22 13:06 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knewspost/common -> /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common/

Now, I checked other kde packages like kdebase, but it seems like it uses the same 
symlinks.
What is the preferred way to *fix* this, or should I just ignore the rpmlint message?

--
Marcel Pol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux 2.4.17-6mdksmp, up 3 days, 24





Re: [Cooker] Re: evolution bug/patch to allow specifying sendmail path

2002-01-22 Thread Ben Reser

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:15:33PM +0100, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> examples ?

mutt :)

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless,
whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism
or the holy name of liberty and democracy? - Ghandi




Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Frederic Corne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> it is on a vmware image (v2.0.4-1142) for a french keyboard.
> install by nfs
> VERSION :
> Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020121 23:19
> 
> using network.img
> 
> - graphical install don't works, using "text" install (mode expert)

Why? Anything in the logs? It's probably because under VMWare,
the emulated video card doesn't support Vesa-2.0, right?


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Frederic Corne

Fabrice FACORAT wrote:

> le mar 22-01-2002 ` 12:01, Frederic Corne a icrit :

>>(installing  of urpmi is tedious ! :
>>error: failed dependencies:
>> eject is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>> webfetch is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>> perl-DateManip >= 5.40 is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>> perl-gettext   is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>> rpmtools >= 4.0-5mdk is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>>)
>>
> 
> that's why to my mind urpmi need to be installed by default. So you will
> just have to install basesystem and after : urpmi sshd iptables
>  

I agree ! But it seems that with the "basic_install" option nothing than 
the basic is installed ...


I join the list of rpm.

I have added manualy :
openssl
openssh *
iptables
eject
wget
perl-DateManip
perl-gettext
rpmtools




FC




ash-0.2-25mdk
basesystem-8.1-2mdk
bash-2.05-15mdk
bdflush-1.5-19mdk
bzip2-1.0.1-17mdk
chkconfig-1.2.24-3mdk
common-licenses-1.0-5mdk
console-tools-0.2.3-25mdk
cracklib-2.7-15mdk
cracklib-dicts-2.7-15mdk
crontabs-1.9-2mdk
db2-2.4.14-5mdk
dev-3.2-3mdk
devfsd-1.3.21-2mdk
diffutils-2.7-30mdk
dosfstools-2.8-2mdk
dynamic-0.5-1mdk
e2fsprogs-1.25-2mdk
eject-2.0.12-2mdk
etcskel-1.63-13mdk
filesystem-2.1.3-4mdk
fileutils-4.1-7mdk
findutils-4.1.7-3mdk
gawk-3.1.0-3mdk
gettext-base-0.10.40-3mdk
getty_ps-2.0.7j-15mdk
glibc-2.2.4-22mdk
grep-2.4.2-9mdk
groff-for-man-1.17.2-5mdk
grub-0.90-4mdk
gzip-1.2.4a-8mdk
hdparm-4.6-1mdk
info-4.0-22mdk
info-install-4.0-22mdk
initscripts-6.40.2-14mdk
iproute2-2.2.4-13mdk
iptables-1.2.4-2mdk
iputils-20001110-9mdk
isapnptools-1.26-4mdk
kernel-2.4.17.7mdk-1-1mdk
kudzu-0.99.23-4mdk
ldconfig-2.2.4-22mdk
ldetect-lst-0.1.2-34mdk
less-358-14mdk
libbzip2_1-1.0.1-17mdk
libext2fs2-1.25-2mdk
libgdbm2-1.8.0-18mdk
libglib1.2-1.2.10-4mdk
libgpm1-1.19.6-2mdk
libintl1-0.10.40-3mdk
libncurses5-5.2-17mdk
libnewt0.50-0.50.34-2mdk
libopenssl0-0.9.6c-1mdk
libpython2.2-2.2-6mdk
libslang1-1.4.4-3mdk
libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.71mdk
libtermcap2-2.0.8-30mdk
libutempter0-0.5.2-5mdk
lilo-21.7.5-3mdk
locales-2.3.1.2-6mdk
locales-fr-2.3.1.2-6mdk
logrotate-3.6-1mdk
losetup-2.11m-7mdk
man-1.5j-1mdk
mandrake-release-8.2-0.2mdk
mingetty-0.9.4-20mdk
mkbootdisk-1.4.2-8mdk
mkinitrd-3.1.6-19mdk
mktemp-1.5-10mdk
modutils-2.4.12-2mdk
mount-2.11m-7mdk
msec-0.17-14mdk
ncurses-5.2-17mdk
net-tools-1.60-2mdk
nfs-utils-clients-0.3.3-3mdk
ntsysv-1.2.24-3mdk
numlock-2.0-6mdk
openssh-3.0.2p1-2mdk
openssh-clients-3.0.2p1-2mdk
openssh-server-3.0.2p1-2mdk
openssl-0.9.6c-1mdk
pam-0.75-14mdk
passwd-0.64.1-9mdk
perl-5.601-7mdk
perl-base-5.601-7mdk
perl-DateManip-5.40-2mdk
perl-gettext-1.0-9mdk
perl-MDK-Common-1.0.2-8mdk
popt-1.6.3-0.35mdk
portmap-4.0-17mdk
procmail-3.22-3mdk
procps-2.0.7-9mdk
psmisc-20.2-2mdk
pwdb-0.61-5mdk
python-base-2.2-6mdk
rmt-0.4b25-1mdk
rootfiles-8.0-5mdk
rpm-4.0.3-0.35mdk
rpmtools-4.0-7mdk
sash-3.4-9mdk
sed-3.02-12mdk
setserial-2.17-5mdk
setup-2.2.0-19mdk
shadow-utils-2902-5mdk
sh-utils-2.0.11-5mdk
stat-2.5-3mdk
sysklogd-1.4.1-1mdk
syslinux-1.48-10mdk
SysVinit-2.83-2mdk
tar-1.13.25-1mdk
termcap-11.0.1-4mdk
textutils-2.0.17-1mdk
time-1.7-18mdk
tmpwatch-2.8-1mdk
urpmi-3.2-2mdk
utempter-0.5.2-5mdk
util-linux-2.11m-7mdk
vim-minimal-6.0-6mdk
vixie-cron-3.0.1-52mdk
wget-1.8.1-2mdk
which-2.13-4mdk
zlib1-1.1.3-18mdk



Re: [Cooker] Re: evolution bug/patch to allow specifying sendmailpath

2002-01-22 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le mar 22-01-2002 à 11:59, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:32:46AM +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > 
> > Not until it is approved by Evolutions folks..
> 
> Which means what?  Waiting for a release from them with the patch (I
> guess it won't be a patch but will be a "feature" at that time)
> included?  I was hoping that using the distro based evolution with
> "value added" would short circuit that. 

And if it crash they will say : mdk heavily patch their softs with some
bad things that may their apps unstable. ( ask someone from debian ).

> We seem to add all kinds of
> "feature adding non-vendor" patches to other packages, 

examples ?

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Of course a platonic relationship is possible -- but only between
husband and wife.





Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-mime-data-1.0.1-1mdk

2002-01-22 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le mar 22-01-2002 à 04:22, Yves Duret a écrit :
> Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > le lun 21-01-2002 à 17:00, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> > > --=-=-=
> > > Name: gnome-mime-data  Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > > Version : 1.0.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > > Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Mon Jan 21 16:27:28 2002
> > 
> > > Summary : The GNOME virtual file-system libraries
> > > Description :
> > > The GNOME MIME database contains a basic set of applications and MIME
> > > types for a GNOME system.
> > 
> > What's the position of mdk concerning an utility to set some mimes type
> > accross KDE and Gnome so that to increase uniformity ( as for menus ).
> 
> see mandrake-mime rpm...

so there will be maybe a tool to manage them ?

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Showing up is 80% of life.
-- Woody Allen





Re: [Cooker] Need a very simple editor

2002-01-22 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le mar 22-01-2002 à 01:30, Yura Gusev a écrit :
> On 21 Jan 2002, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> 
> > 1╟/ when fail to launch miserably and you have to edit config files by
> > hand
> 
> newbee does not need to do this. He can use draxconf,wizdrake,linuxconf or
> call for support.

My sentence was : when X fails miserably. sorry.
For example DrakX misconfigured graphic card or there's a bug ( see the
old one for nvidia cards ) and the newbie have to edit XF86Config by
hand by following a friend/expert instructions
 
> > 2╟/ when some partitions are incorrect  in fstab and you have to boot in
> > single mode ( so only with / partition sometimes ) and have to manually
> > edit fstab
> 
> newbee does not need to do this coz' he cant fix nor brake it.
> _Normal_ user can use any editor (exept emacs).

lol
But the pb is :
vi is always there, but joe/pico/emacs/whatevertexteditoryouwant may not
be installed. So most of the time you say : use "vi filetoedit" or check
if this one is installed  if not check this one, if not try "urpmi
thisone" but if there's a pb with his source ( CDROM pb, or other source
of urpmi misconfiguration ), no way to get the text editor simply. So go
take it by hand and hope no dependencies pbs. etc ... Painfull for him
and for me who want to solve his pb.
If for example I knew that pico/nano is always installed as for vi, I
will just say "nano textconfigfiletoedit" and it will be able to edit
the file. If the text editor is simple he will not call me to ask how to
save the file or copy/paste or edit ( vi case because of ESC+i ).

> > 3╟/ when there is a pb and have to edit some files by hand without
> > having X
> 
> mcedit or pico.
> 
> > 4╟/ if there was a very easy console text editor installed by default,
> > when I will tell someone to modify a file, I will just tell it :
> > "my_simple_editor file_to_modify". Why ? because it's faster than
> > browsing to find the file and because we should encourage user to know a
> > minimum the CLI
> 
> No, we dont. We should educate them.

encourage aims to educate. Maybe I did a francism. No it's the right
word.
facilitate CLI approch so that they will be less reluctant to use it, or
else you will have : arf, It's so difficult to install a graphic,
there's no fail graphic mode and to arrange things it's a pain, bla bla
bla 

-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Eloquence is logic on fire.





Re: [Cooker] Bug Report: Slow menus

2002-01-22 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le mar 22-01-2002 à 00:53, Derek Simkowiak a écrit :
> 
> OVERVIEW
> 
>   My newbie / Mac heads / Windoze losers tell me that 'Linux is
> slow'.  I tell them they are full of it.  Then they show me.
> 
>   Click on the Gnome foot icon (e.g., "Start" button).  On a 233 MHz
> box, it can take > 1 second for the menu to come up.  On an AMD K6/2
> 450MHz, it can take .2-.4 seconds to come up, a noticable and distracting
> delay.  On a PIII 1 GHz, it can take .05 - .1 seconds to come up,
> something that does NOT happen under Windows on the same box.  Since this
> is the most-used button, the entire desktop (and hence, 'Linux') seems
> slow.
> 
>   The cause?  Gnome re-reads the menus from disk at every click.
> 
> 
> WORKAROUND
> 
>   Gnome Control Center -> Panel -> Menu -> "Keep menus in memory"

I see a pb here :
if you install a package, maybe your menu will not be update.

Does menu force gnome/KDE/whatherwmyouwant menu regeneration when a
package is installed ?

>   Since Red Hat set that to be the default setting, they have seen a
> drastic decrease in the number of complaints about Gnome speed.  Mandrake
> should also make that the default.
> 
> 
> [dereks@dev dereks]$ cat /etc/mandrake-release
> Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586
> 
> [dereks@dev dereks]$ rpm -q gnome-core gnome-libs
> gnome-core-1.4.0.4-16mdk
> gnome-libs-1.4.1.2-6mdk
> 
> 
> --Derek
> 
> 
> 
-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Dijkstra me hait problement.
-- Linus Torvalds, (dans kernel/sched.c)





Re: [Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

le mar 22-01-2002 à 12:01, Frederic Corne a écrit :
> target : installation of a basic system + iptables + openssh server and 
> clients.
> 
> it is on a vmware image (v2.0.4-1142) for a french keyboard.
> install by nfs
> VERSION :
> Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020121 23:19
> 
> using network.img
> 
> - graphical install don't works, using "text" install (mode expert)
> 
> - select "base system" + iptables + openssh server and clients
> 
> - when installing packages :
>  -lot of perl complains about locales (means locales-fr is not 
> installed)
>  - ask for installing locales-et-2.3.1.2-6mdk.i586 ? why  an 
> error of myself when selecting ? I don't known.?
>  - (off topic) : when add user, ask for "Real name" , "User name", 
> ...  I think "user name" may trouble someone . "login name" or "user 
> login name" may be better.
>  - list of services started at boot time (see services.jpg): I don't 
>   understood why there is an alsa, kudzu, sound, usb, nfslock and not sshd !
> 
> reboot .
>   - space used : 104Mo but :
>  very important : locales-fr is not installed !!!
> iptables and openssh stuff are not installed !
> urpmi is not installed
> 
> (installing  of urpmi is tedious ! :
> error: failed dependencies:
>  eject is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>  webfetch is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>  perl-DateManip >= 5.40 is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>  perl-gettext   is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
>  rpmtools >= 4.0-5mdk is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
> )

that's why to my mind urpmi need to be installed by default. So you will
just have to install basesystem and after : urpmi sshd iptables
 
> after 1h30 of divers hacks I have a correct system which use 120Mo
> 
> 
> FC
> 
> 
-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
"Two beer or not two beer, zat is ze question" 
-- M Megot, Prof de gym du Petit Spirou





Re: [Cooker] scanner does not work: problem with sane or devfs?

2002-01-22 Thread Frederik Himpe

On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 04:17, Yves Duret wrote:
> Frederik Himpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just configured my SCSI adapter (old AVA1505 ISA card), to use my
> > scanner. Now sane-find-scanner does find it:
> > 
> > [root@Jupiter dev]# sane-find-scanner
> > # Note that sane-find-scanner will find any scanner that is connected
> > # to a SCSI bus and some scanners that are connected to the Universal
> > # Serial Bus (USB) depending on your OS. It will even find scanners
> > # that are not supported at all by SANE. It won't find a scanner that
> > # is connected to a parallel or proprietary port.
> > 
> > sane-find-scanner: found SCSI scanner "AGFA SNAPSCAN 1236 1.20" at
> > device /dev/sg1
> > [root@Jupiter dev]# ll /dev/sg1
> > lr-xr-xr-x1 root root   36 Jan 21 18:01 /dev/sg1 ->
> > scsi/host1/bus0/target2/lun0/generic
> > 
> > But when running scanimage or xsane, it says it can't find a scanner,
> > and I should make sure the scanner is detected by sane-find-scanner.
> > Could this be a devfs problem, or something wrong with sane? Are there
> > others who can use their scanner?
> 
> what is in your /etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf ?
> edit it and put /dev/sg1 and remove all the other line beginning bu /dev/

Thank you, now it works perfectly. In /etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf was
/dev/sga, I changed it to /dev/sg1. I was a bit surprised to read that
there was a configuration file to edit, in Mandrake 8 it suffised to
configure the SCSI-card and install sane.

Frederik





[Cooker] Re: libfreetype.so.7 (again...)

2002-01-22 Thread Oden Eriksson

Geoffrey Lee writes: 

> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 09:44:58AM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
>> On Tuesdayen den 22 January 2002 09.29, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>> > >Where is "libfreetype.so.7" ?
>> > >
>> > >With the latest X it seems to have disappeared, and latest kdebase (26mdk)
>> > >seems to require it...
>> >
>> > If it were only kdebase it wouldn't have been a big issue:
>> >
>> > try running
>> >
>> > "urpmf --requires libfreetype.so.7"
>> >
>> > on your cooker system... 
>> 
>> That yields nothing on my system.
>  
> 
> The libfreetype library was bumped down back to 6 for the XFree86 final. 
> 
> Assuming fredl's not changed the library in any way you can use a soft link
> until things are rebuilt with libfreetype.so.6 again.

Thanks, I did that just to be naugthy. Is there a particular reason to not 
go gack to build X against the standard freetype libs ? 


 --
Kindest regards // Oden Eriksson
Deserve-IT Networks/HFE Systems 





Re: [Cooker] PATCH: Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!

2002-01-22 Thread Pixel

Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > agreed, using DURING_INSTALL for this seems a bad idea.
> > 
> > we'd better run ldconfig and update-menus than dropping a few other things
> > done in %post's.
> > 
> > maybe we could have another (different) way of skipping ldconfig and
> > update-menus...
> > 
> 
> I don't think setting DURING_INSTALL removed the execution of
> scriplets. It should be something else because there is nothing in rpm
> in that way...

the message "Software manager never executed RPM scriptlets!" is wrong.

The problem is that setting DURING_INSTALL disable the execution of *some*
scriplets, those which have:

if [ -z "$DURING_INSTALL" ]; then
  ...
fi

One such scriplet is the /sbin/installkernel one.

So grpmi setting DURING_INSTALL causes /sbin/installkernel to exit without
doing anything.




[Cooker] Results on a minimal installation

2002-01-22 Thread Frederic Corne

target : installation of a basic system + iptables + openssh server and 
clients.

it is on a vmware image (v2.0.4-1142) for a french keyboard.
install by nfs
VERSION :
Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020121 23:19

using network.img

- graphical install don't works, using "text" install (mode expert)

- select "base system" + iptables + openssh server and clients

- when installing packages :
 -lot of perl complains about locales (means locales-fr is not 
installed)
 - ask for installing locales-et-2.3.1.2-6mdk.i586 ? why  an 
error of myself when selecting ? I don't known.?
 - (off topic) : when add user, ask for "Real name" , "User name", 
...  I think "user name" may trouble someone . "login name" or "user 
login name" may be better.
 - list of services started at boot time (see services.jpg): I don't 
  understood why there is an alsa, kudzu, sound, usb, nfslock and not sshd !

reboot .
  - space used : 104Mo but :
   very important : locales-fr is not installed !!!
iptables and openssh stuff are not installed !
urpmi is not installed

(installing  of urpmi is tedious ! :
error: failed dependencies:
 eject is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
 webfetch is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
 perl-DateManip >= 5.40 is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
 perl-gettext   is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
 rpmtools >= 4.0-5mdk is needed by urpmi-3.2-2mdk
)

after 1h30 of divers hacks I have a correct system which use 120Mo


FC



<>

[Cooker] Re: evolution bug/patch to allow specifying sendmail path

2002-01-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:32:46AM +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> 
> Not until it is approved by Evolutions folks..

Which means what?  Waiting for a release from them with the patch (I
guess it won't be a patch but will be a "feature" at that time)
included?  I was hoping that using the distro based evolution with
"value added" would short circuit that.  We seem to add all kinds of
"feature adding non-vendor" patches to other packages, why so formal
with evolution?

b.


-- 
Brian J. Murrell




Re: [Cooker] urpmi

2002-01-22 Thread François Pons

Daouda LO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> urpmi use wget (or curl) at the backend to get files.
> For wget there is  a -c (or --continue ) option to "continue getting a
> partially-downloaded file" if the ftp or http servers support "range
> header" which is mostly the case.
> Francois, what could be done there?

It can't be used because it is not compatible with time stamp conditional
download (which are considered preferable).

François.




Re: [Cooker] evolution bug/patch to allow specifying sendmail path

2002-01-22 Thread Frederic Crozat

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:45:59 +0100, Brian J. Murrell wrote:

> Evolution allows one to set either an SMTP server as it's method of
> sending e-mail or one can tell it to use the local sendmail command.
> 
> Problem is, the latter does not allow one to configure the path to the
> sendmail.  This sucks if you use a sendmail wrapper.
> 
> There is a bug filed about this (only just recently however) at Ximian
> complete with two available patches (the same patch just for different
> versions of evolution) to correct the problem:
> 
> http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18382
> 
> Would it be possible to get that patch included in the next Mandrake
> build of evolution?

Not until it is approved by Evolutions folks..

-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




Re: [Cooker] libfreetype.so.7 (again...)

2002-01-22 Thread J.A. Magallon


On 20020122 Geoffrey Lee wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 09:44:58AM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
>> On Tuesdayen den 22 January 2002 09.29, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>> > >Where is "libfreetype.so.7" ?
>> > >
>> > >With the latest X it seems to have disappeared, and latest kdebase (26mdk)
>> > >seems to require it...
>> >
>> > If it were only kdebase it wouldn't have been a big issue:
>> >
>> > try running
>> >
>> > "urpmf --requires libfreetype.so.7"
>> >
>> > on your cooker system...
>> 
>> That yields nothing on my system.
>
>
>The libfreetype library was bumped down back to 6 for the XFree86 final.
>
>Assuming fredl's not changed the library in any way you can use a soft link
>until things are rebuilt with libfreetype.so.6 again.
>

I solved it with a backup of libfreetype.so.7*, installing the new XFree
with --nodeps, and restoring the .7 versions to X11R6/lib.
But now there is a duplicate library libfreetype is both in /usr/lib
(from freetype2-2.0.6-1mdk) and in /usr/X11R6/lib (from XFree-libs).

I think XFree should be rebuilt to use the standard freetype ?.

-- 
J.A. Magallon   #  Let the source be with you...
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.18-pre4-beo #3 SMP Wed Jan 16 02:58:41 CET 2002 i686




[Cooker] no more msec custom ?

2002-01-22 Thread Guillaume Rousse

using msec-0.17-14mdk
[root@bononcini guillaume]# msec custom
msec: Invalid secure level custom.  Use msec.py [0-5] to set it.
-- 
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html




Re: [Cooker] libfreetype.so.7 (again...)

2002-01-22 Thread Stefan van der Eijk

>
>
>>>Where is "libfreetype.so.7" ?
>>>
>>>With the latest X it seems to have disappeared, and latest kdebase (26mdk)
>>>seems to require it...
>>>
>>If it were only kdebase it wouldn't have been a big issue:
>>
>>try running
>>
>>"urpmf --requires libfreetype.so.7"
>>
>>on your cooker system...
>>
>
>That yields nothing on my system.
>

$ urpmf --requires libfreetype.so.7
scribus:requires:libfreetype.so.7
guarddog:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kstocks:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdetoys3:requires:libfreetype.so.7
knetfilter:requires:libfreetype.so.7
keurocalc:requires:libfreetype.so.7
agbrowser:requires:libfreetype.so.7
qtella:requires:libfreetype.so.7
libgtk+2:requires:libfreetype.so.7
gtk+2:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdelibs:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdelibs-sound:requires:libfreetype.so.7
libgtk+2-devel:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdebase:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdegraphics:requires:libfreetype.so.7
libqtcups2:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdeutils:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdenetwork:requires:libfreetype.so.7
koffice:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdevelop:requires:libfreetype.so.7
icewm-gnome:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdbg:requires:libfreetype.so.7
kdebase-nsplugins:requires:libfreetype.so.7
qtcups:requires:libfreetype.so.7
xterm:requires:libfreetype.so.7

It's not too bad though... basically the packages that have been built 
since XF 4.1.96 was installed...





Re: [Cooker] libfreetype.so.7 (again...)

2002-01-22 Thread Geoffrey Lee

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 09:44:58AM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> On Tuesdayen den 22 January 2002 09.29, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> > >Where is "libfreetype.so.7" ?
> > >
> > >With the latest X it seems to have disappeared, and latest kdebase (26mdk)
> > >seems to require it...
> >
> > If it were only kdebase it wouldn't have been a big issue:
> >
> > try running
> >
> > "urpmf --requires libfreetype.so.7"
> >
> > on your cooker system...
> 
> That yields nothing on my system.


The libfreetype library was bumped down back to 6 for the XFree86 final.

Assuming fredl's not changed the library in any way you can use a soft link
until things are rebuilt with libfreetype.so.6 again.

-- Geoff.





Re: [Cooker] libfreetype.so.7 (again...)

2002-01-22 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Tuesdayen den 22 January 2002 09.29, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >Where is "libfreetype.so.7" ?
> >
> >With the latest X it seems to have disappeared, and latest kdebase (26mdk)
> >seems to require it...
>
> If it were only kdebase it wouldn't have been a big issue:
>
> try running
>
> "urpmf --requires libfreetype.so.7"
>
> on your cooker system...

That yields nothing on my system.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks/HFE Systems, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel 2.4.17-7mdksmp: 13 hours 56 minutes
| cpu0 @ 799.53 bm, fan 4591 rpm, temp +29°C
| cpu1 @ 801.17 bm, fan 4560 rpm, temp +29.5°C




Re: [Cooker] libfreetype.so.7 (again...)

2002-01-22 Thread Stefan van der Eijk

>
>
>Where is "libfreetype.so.7" ?
>
>With the latest X it seems to have disappeared, and latest kdebase (26mdk) 
>seems to require it...
>
If it were only kdebase it wouldn't have been a big issue:

try running

"urpmf --requires libfreetype.so.7"

on your cooker system...





[Cooker] libfreetype.so.7 (again...)

2002-01-22 Thread Oden Eriksson

Hi,

Where is "libfreetype.so.7" ?

With the latest X it seems to have disappeared, and latest kdebase (26mdk) 
seems to require it...

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks/HFE Systems, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel 2.4.17-7mdksmp: 13 hours 27 minutes
| cpu0 @ 799.53 bm, fan 4500 rpm, temp +29°C
| cpu1 @ 801.17 bm, fan 4560 rpm, temp +29.5°C