[Cooker] Install failure => check forced of 70 GB ext3

2003-08-14 Thread guran
Hi

I was trying to install from my mirror from uninett by hd.img when some 
packages was missing:
perl-URPM-0.93-2
urpmi-4.2-20
I decided to leave the installation as I knew that the mirror contained newer 
packages- Ctrl-Alt-F2 and Ctrl-Alt-Del.
When I was booting my other Cooker I had to see a full check of my two hard 
drives in ext3, although pixel had said that this should not occur.

From syslog:
Aug 11 22:48:45 localhost depmod: depmod:
Aug 11 22:48:45 localhost depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in 
/lib/modules/2.4.22-0.1mdk/kernel/drivers/atm/he.o.gz
Aug 11 22:48:45 localhost rc.sysinit: Finding module dependencies:  succeeded
Aug 11 22:48:45 localhost rc.sysinit: Loading sound module (sb):  succeeded
Aug 11 22:48:45 localhost : Loading module: scsi_hostadapter
Aug 11 22:48:46 localhost fsck: /mnt/tvaan was not cleanly unmounted, check 
forced.
Aug 11 22:48:47 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:49:57 localhost last message repeated 278 times
Aug 11 22:49:57 localhost fsck: /mnt/tvaan:
Aug 11 22:49:57 localhost fsck: ^B/lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:49:58 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:49:58 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:49:58 localhost fsck: ^B/mnt/tvaan: 174900/64 files (0.9% 
non-contiguous), 777229/1279167 blocks
Aug 11 22:49:58 localhost fsck: /mnt/attic was not cleanly unmounted, check 
forced.
Aug 11 22:49:58 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb1 was not cleanly unmounted, check 
forced.
Aug 11 22:49:58 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:49:59 localhost last message repeated 2 times
Aug 11 22:49:59 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb1: /lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:49:59 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:49:59 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb1: 16/24096 files (0.0% 
non-contiguous), 10390/96358 blocks
Aug 11 22:49:59 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb6
Aug 11 22:49:59 localhost fsck:  was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Aug 11 22:49:59 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:50:30 localhost last message repeated 34 times
Aug 11 22:50:43 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb6: /lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:50:43 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb6: 57071/670432 files (0.3% 
non-contiguous), 297488/1339411 blocks
Aug 11 22:50:43 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb9
Aug 11 22:50:44 localhost fsck:  was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Aug 11 22:50:53 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:51:01 localhost last message repeated 65 times
Aug 11 22:51:01 localhost fsck: ^B/lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:51:02 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:51:02 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:51:02 localhost fsck: ^B/mnt/attic: 17119/843648 files (8.3% 
non-contiguous), 1417923/1686817 blocks
Aug 11 22:51:02 localhost fsck: /dev/hda9
Aug 11 22:51:02 localhost fsck:  was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Aug 11 22:51:03 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:51:53 localhost last message repeated 27 times
Aug 11 22:51:55 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb9:
Aug 11 22:51:55 localhost fsck: /lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:51:56 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:51:56 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb9: 94515/645120 files (2.0% 
non-contiguous), 553601/1289208 blocks
Aug 11 22:51:56 localhost fsck: /mnt/garage
Aug 11 22:51:56 localhost fsck:  was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Aug 11 22:51:58 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:52:32 localhost last message repeated 135 times
Aug 11 22:52:32 localhost fsck: /mnt/garage: /lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:52:32 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:52:33 localhost last message repeated 4 times
Aug 11 22:52:33 localhost fsck: /mnt/garage: 14709/642560 files (1.0% 
non-contiguous), 1144052/1283184 blocks
Aug 11 22:52:33 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:52:33 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb7
Aug 11 22:52:33 localhost fsck:  was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Aug 11 22:52:33 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:52:42 localhost last message repeated 73 times
Aug 11 22:52:42 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb7: /lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:52:42 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:52:43 localhost last message repeated 4 times
Aug 11 22:52:43 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb7: 7553/654080 files (0.3% 
non-contiguous), 73840/1307281 blocks
Aug 11 22:52:43 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:52:43 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb10
Aug 11 22:52:43 localhost fsck:  was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Aug 11 22:52:43 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:53:27 localhost last message repeated 346 times
Aug 11 22:53:27 localhost fsck: ^B/lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:53:27 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:53:28 localhost last message repeated 2 times
Aug 11 22:53:28 localhost fsck: ^B/dev/hda9: 196315/128 files (0.9% 
non-contiguous), 820250/1279167 blocks
Aug 11 22:53:28 localhost fsck: /dev/hda10
Aug 11 22:53:28 localhost fsck:  was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Aug 11 22:53:29 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:53:36 localhost last message repeated 4 times
Aug 11 22:53:38 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb10: /lost+found not found.  CREATED.
Aug 11 22:53:39 localhost fsck: /dev/hdb10: 13492/1052480 files (1.9% 
non-contiguous), 1529031/2102499 blocks
Aug 11 22:53:42 localhost fsck: ^B
Aug 11 22:54:49 

[Cooker] Install Failure - Doesn\'t Recognize CD-ROM / 9.0 BETA - Bug report / Installation

2002-09-22 Thread Alan Shoemaker

mandrakeexpert incident 32567 forwarded to cooker.

when replying, please cc this email address:

sorry no emailaddress is listed in the mandrakeexpert 
database for the originator of this report.

quoted text below

 robbiex : 22/09 03:16 : Incident created Mandrake Linux 9 
with ASUS P4B533 motherboard and TDK 40/12/48 or
Creative 12/10/32x CD-ROM. CD-ROM starts with auto-boot, 
displays
Mandrake install display and multiple initial steps including
correctly finding IDE hard drives. Message then states that 
no CD-ROM
found and asks for SCSI CD-ROM driver. CD-ROM is IDE 
connected. I don't know if this explains the difficulty, but 
I have read that the kernel is having problems with the Intel 
845 chipset.
Any solution to this problem?
Thank you.
Robbie

-end quoted text-
-- 
Alan




Re: [Cooker] Install failure during partition formatting

2001-09-09 Thread Digital Wokan

e2fsck /dev/hda5 returns the following...
e2fsck 1.23, 15-Aug-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
/dev/hda5: clean, 11/262144 files, 8241/524112 blocks

report.bug attached as requested

Pixel wrote:
> Digital Wokan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > fsck failed with exit code 128 or signal 0.
> per e2fsck manpage, it means "Shared library error".
> can you try switching to console 2 and type e2fsck and see if the usage is
> available? If it works, you may also try e2fsck on your partition and see what
> it says.
> or can you mail me the report.bug?
> to get it:
> during install, switch to console 2,
> put a fat floppy in floppy drive,
> and type "bug"
> -> it will put report.bug on floppy
> thanks, cu Pixel.



* lspci

agpgart : VIA Technologies|VT82C598 [Apollo MVP3] [BRIDGE_HOST]
unknown : VIA Technologies|VT82C598 [Apollo MVP3 AGP] [BRIDGE_PCI]
unknown : VIA Technologies|VT82C586/A/B PCI-to-ISA [Apollo VP] [BRIDGE_ISA]
unknown : VIA Technologies|VT82C586 IDE [Apollo] [STORAGE_IDE]
usb-uhci: VIA Technologies|VT82C586B USB [SERIAL_USB] SubVendor=0x0925 
SubDevice=0x1234
unknown : VIA Technologies|VT82C586B ACPI [BRIDGE_HOST]
via-rhine   : VIA Technologies|VT86C100A [Rhine 10/100] [NETWORK_ETHERNET] 
SubVendor=0x1186 SubDevice=0x1400
Card:S3 Savage4 : S3 Inc.|Savage 4 [DISPLAY_VGA]
unknown : Virtual|Hub


* pci_devices

110605980   ea08
0200


0008110685980   



0038110605860   



0039110605710   
e001
0010

003a110630389   
e401
0020
usb-uhci
003b110630409   



0050110630439   e801ed00
ec000080
0080
0001via-rhine
010053338a22b   e900e008
0008
0800
0001


* fdisk


Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 977 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   * 131248976   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda232   292   2096482+   5  Extended
/dev/hda532   292   2096451   83  Linux


* scsi

Attached devices: none


* lsmod

vfat8848   1
fat28416   0 [vfat]
scsi_mod   47680   0
parport_pc 22320   0
parport21056   0 [parport_pc]
ide-cd 26000   0
cdrom  28768   0 [ide-cd]
serial 66080   0
usb-uhci   19584  

Re: [Cooker] Install failure during partition formatting

2001-09-09 Thread Digital Wokan

Apologies to the list for my last message.  I forgot to change the "TO"
on the message.

Pixel wrote:
> 
> Digital Wokan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > fsck failed with exit code 128 or signal 0.
> 
> per e2fsck manpage, it means "Shared library error".
> 
> can you try switching to console 2 and type e2fsck and see if the usage is
> available? If it works, you may also try e2fsck on your partition and see what
> it says.
> 
> or can you mail me the report.bug?
> to get it:
> 
> during install, switch to console 2,
> put a fat floppy in floppy drive,
> and type "bug"
> 
> -> it will put report.bug on floppy
> 
> thanks, cu Pixel.




Re: [Cooker] Install failure during partition formatting

2001-09-09 Thread Pixel

Digital Wokan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> fsck failed with exit code 128 or signal 0.

per e2fsck manpage, it means "Shared library error".

can you try switching to console 2 and type e2fsck and see if the usage is
available? If it works, you may also try e2fsck on your partition and see what
it says.

or can you mail me the report.bug? 
to get it:

during install, switch to console 2,
put a fat floppy in floppy drive,
and type "bug"

-> it will put report.bug on floppy


thanks, cu Pixel.




[Cooker] Install failure during partition formatting

2001-09-09 Thread Digital Wokan

I figured I'd give the install a run again and see how it was
progressing.  Nice to see the icons there instead of the placeholders. 
Unfortunately, I get the following...
An error occurred
fsck failed with exit code 128 or signal 0.

I tried using different parts of the hard drive (setting up just enough
for a 190MB Swap and a 1GB / on my 8GB drive).  No matter where I place
the partitions, I get this error.  I have been using this drive for
Cooker testing for a long time without error.  And considering the
attempts at leaving portions unpartitioned to see if it was a single
part of the hard drive, I honestly believe something may be wrong with
fsck.




[Cooker] install failure - fsck failed

2001-08-22 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

Synced half an hour ago. I get "fsck failed" after selecting root
partition (hda1 in my case) and proceeding further. I tried format it in
diskdrake before pressing Done with the same result. Report.bug
attached.

-andrej

(I wanted to try "holy minimal install" so I had empty auto_inst.cfg.pl
on floppy as per somebody's advice).


 report.bug


[Cooker] Install failure 8/17/01

2001-08-17 Thread Digital Wokan

NFS install
step:  formatting partitions
set to format reiserfs (hda1) and swap (hda6)
resulted in "mount failed: No such device."
returned to partitioning menu
removed and recreated RFS partition (hda1 again)
list of partitions to format showed hda1 only (no swap)
same error resulted "mount failed: No such device."




Re[4]: [Cooker] install failure with cooker DrakX v1.514

2001-06-09 Thread Robin Cook

Hello Pixel,

It's a local machine with Mandrake 7.2 on it that I have rsynced
sunsite.uio.no.

Saturday, June 09, 2001, 11:41:08 AM, you wrote:

P> Robin Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> I have tried it 4 times with the same result each time.

P> what server are you using? i may be able to reproduce.

P> [...]

>> >>   At F3: Warning: Died at /usr/bin/perl-install/ftp.pm line 34
>> >>  Warning: Undefined subroutine &c::rpmdbClose called at
>> >>  /usr/bin/perl-install/pkgs.pm line 1363

-- 
Best regards,
 Robinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] install failure with cooker DrakX v1.514

2001-06-09 Thread Pixel

Robin Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have tried it 4 times with the same result each time.

what server are you using? i may be able to reproduce.

[...]

> >>   At F3: Warning: Died at /usr/bin/perl-install/ftp.pm line 34
> >>  Warning: Undefined subroutine &c::rpmdbClose called at
> >>  /usr/bin/perl-install/pkgs.pm line 1363




Re[2]: [Cooker] install failure with cooker DrakX v1.514

2001-06-09 Thread Robin Cook

Hello Pixel,

I have tried it 4 times with the same result each time.

If I say Ok at the failure it just hangs.

Saturday, June 09, 2001, 7:55:13 AM, you wrote:

P> Robin Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>>   At F3: Warning: Died at /usr/bin/perl-install/ftp.pm line 34
>>  Warning: Undefined subroutine &c::rpmdbClose called at
>>  /usr/bin/perl-install/pkgs.pm line 1363

P> this is strange. Net::FTP->new must have failed. If you retry, does it still
P> fail?

P> i don't know in which Net::FTP->new fails, and the error message should be ok
(Net::FTP->>new should set $@)

P> do you have more information?

-- 
Best regards,
 Robinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [Cooker] install failure with cooker DrakX v1.514

2001-06-09 Thread Pixel

Robin Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>   At F3: Warning: Died at /usr/bin/perl-install/ftp.pm line 34
>  Warning: Undefined subroutine &c::rpmdbClose called at
>  /usr/bin/perl-install/pkgs.pm line 1363

this is strange. Net::FTP->new must have failed. If you retry, does it still
fail?

i don't know in which Net::FTP->new fails, and the error message should be ok
(Net::FTP->new should set $@)

do you have more information?




[Cooker] install failure with cooker DrakX v1.514

2001-06-09 Thread Robin Cook

Hello,

  Tried doing a new install of cooker today and got the following
  error after selecting individual packages.

  In the X window "Undefined subroutine &c::rpmdbClose called

  At F1: Attempt to free unreference scalar at
  /usr/sbin/perl-install/pkgs.pm line 1363

  At F2: DrakX v1.514

  At F3: Warning: Died at /usr/bin/perl-install/ftp.pm line 34
 Warning: Undefined subroutine &c::rpmdbClose called at
 /usr/bin/perl-install/pkgs.pm line 1363

-- 
Best regards,
 Robin  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-10 Thread Vincent Meyer

Yes, but in my case my computer is dual-boot, and most of my old data
is on that windows partition.  Previous versions would recognise the
windows partition, and default to a mount point of /mnt/windows.  The
current installer will bomb with that, but is fine if the mount point 
is left blank - so that the partition is ignored.  It would be nice
if the windows partition CAN be mounted - just not formatted.

Vinny






Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-10 Thread Ron Stodden

Johan,

> My point is that you shouldn't choose to mount the windows partions at all, 
> that way you don't give the installer the chance to format them.

Your point remains totally lost on me.  The sentence above makes no
sense, sorry!

You seem to this writer to probably have some basic miscomprehension
of what mounting is.  I hope it clears up.  Mounting is an operating
system software function, not a hardware function.

-- 
Regards,

Ron. [AU]




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-10 Thread Johan Rehnberg

On Wednesday 10 January 2001 01:38, you wrote:
> Johan Rehnberg wrote:
> > I also lost my windows partition. But that shouldn't scare you off, just
> > make sure you don't mount the windows partition(s) (/mnt/win_c etc.) the
> > next time you install cooker.
>
> The Windows partition is destroyed when you UNcheck the installer's
> 'format hda1' (ie Windows) checkbox (if that is what you are very
> unclearly attempting to talk about?).

My point is that you shouldn't choose to mount the windows partions at all, 
that way you don't give the installer the chance to format them.

Johan




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-10 Thread Pixel

Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> No, better that the installer keeps its grubby fingers out of
> partitions which have not been given to it to write in.  Just why on
> earth did the cooker installer give you checkboxes to format each of
> your FAT32 (Windows) partitions?

because we can do it! As for me i don't want to boot windows to have some fat
partitions...


> 
> You must realise that you do not OWN the machine you are installing
> on, only the partition(s) explicitly given you to install in.   That
> they did not own the world was a hard lesson for MicroSoft to
> eventually begin to learn ...

sob... that's what you get trying to help :'-(


Anyway, i've tried in expert/beginner and can't reproduce the "format windows
partition even when not asked".




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Ron Stodden

Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> Today chmouel installed and there was no such problems.

Thanks.

> But anyway cooker is said to not be stable, I would suggest to never
> install it on a machine where you have partitions on which there is
> significant amount of "not to loose" data..

No, better that the installer keeps its grubby fingers out of
partitions which have not been given to it to write in.  Just why on
earth did the cooker installer give you checkboxes to format each of
your FAT32 (Windows) partitions?

You must realise that you do not OWN the machine you are installing
on, only the partition(s) explicitly given you to install in.   That
they did not own the world was a hard lesson for MicroSoft to
eventually begin to learn ...

-- 
Regards,

Ron. [AU]




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Ron Stodden

Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> 
> exact filesize should be enough, no?

Not at all!  Imagine if just the value of some important constant had
been changed?  That will not change the size of the object, but will
change the timestamp.   

A watertight approach would also include an md5sum match.  rsync in
effect checks all three to detect differences, therefore so should
we.  

Military precision is the only safe approach.

-- 
Regards,

Ron. [AU]




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Ron Stodden

Johan Rehnberg wrote:

> I also lost my windows partition. But that shouldn't scare you off, just make
> sure you don't mount the windows partition(s) (/mnt/win_c etc.) the next time
> you install cooker.

The Windows partition is destroyed when you UNcheck the installer's
'format hda1' (ie Windows) checkbox (if that is what you are very
unclearly attempting to talk about?).

-- 
Regards,

Ron. [AU]




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Johan Rehnberg

On Tuesday 09 January 2001 03:08, you wrote:
> Pixel wrote:
> > it should be fixed now. at least with
> >
> > Mandrake/base:
> > -rw-r--r--   1 root root 11859052 Jan  6 22:22 mdkinst_stage2.gz
>
> We need the GMT offset of this date/time and an assurance that
> timestamps are handled across timezones with the integrity that rsync
> uses during the developer-reference machine-primary mirror- mirrors
> process.
>
> For example, I am in GMT+1100 and I see (Konqueror):
>
> Mandrake/base:
>
> [ron@small base]$ ls -l mdkinst_stage2.gz
> -rw-r--r--1 ron  ron  11859052 Jan  7 08:22
> mdkinst_stage2.gz
>
> This shows a +10 hour time difference.  The size and 22 minutes in
> both cases looks encouraging.
>
> Your email is GMT+1, so if that is also the tz of your reference
> mirror, all is explained.
>
> But the KDE2.1 Konqueror Properties on it shows a size of 12,936,351
> ???
>
> I believe what the command line says!
>
> Interestingly, the KDE panel Show Desktop button leaves this
> Properties dialog showing - KDE2 is certainly not quite there yet ...
>
> However, today's cooker rsync download shows:
>
> -rw-r--r--1 ron  ron  11910195 Jan  9 05:21
> mdkinst_stage2.gz
>
> Summary:
>
> After losing my Windows partition at the last Cooker install I
> attempted, I am not inclined to try another Cooker install until I
> receive multiple trusted assurances that such things will not happen
> again.

I also lost my windows partition. But that shouldn't scare you off, just make 
sure you don't mount the windows partition(s) (/mnt/win_c etc.) the next time 
you install cooker.

Johan




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Udo Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> Hi,
> I can't install over network because Tokenring and Thinkpad is not supported
> in the plain installation-subtree (each Thinkpad-type has different settings
> for the ibmtr_cs).
> 
> Anyway until now I always installed the cooker from a mirrored HD-partition
> but this don't works anymore.
> Until now I always needed only the following directorys for successful install:
> 
> Mandrake/RPMS and Mandrake/base
> Is it true that I need now also Mandrake/mdkinst ? What is the purpose of the
> Mandrake/base/mdkinst_stage2.gz ?

Ok now the latest version is capable of launching the installation with
the ramdisk on Mandrake/base -- to sum up, it would be the same as before
for you.

You can reach it before any appearance of mirrors, here:

http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/hd.img

This one has the following md5sum: 93c408ed5283b03d049e11d4ff7ee180




-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Udo Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> Hi,
> I can't install over network because Tokenring and Thinkpad is not supported
> in the plain installation-subtree (each Thinkpad-type has different settings
> for the ibmtr_cs).
> 
> Anyway until now I always installed the cooker from a mirrored HD-partition
> but this don't works anymore.
> Until now I always needed only the following directorys for successful install:
> 
> Mandrake/RPMS and Mandrake/base
> Is it true that I need now also Mandrake/mdkinst ? What is the purpose of the
> Mandrake/base/mdkinst_stage2.gz ?

Okay after some talks here it appears that supporting the second stage
ramdisk is required at least when installing from a vfat partition
(problems of symlinks on the vfat partitions, for example).

So I'll implement that right now.

When done, you'll need, as before, only /RPMS and /base, if you have more
than 52 Mbytes, to do an hd.img install.



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> After losing my Windows partition at the last Cooker install I
> attempted, I am not inclined to try another Cooker install until I
> receive multiple trusted assurances that such things will not happen
> again.

Today chmouel installed and there was no such problems.

But anyway cooker is said to not be stable, I would suggest to never
install it on a machine where you have partitions on which there is
significant amount of "not to loose" data..



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Pixel wrote:
> > 
> > it should be fixed now. at least with
> > 
> > Mandrake/base:
> > -rw-r--r--   1 root root 11859052 Jan  6 22:22 mdkinst_stage2.gz
> 
> We need the GMT offset of this date/time and an assurance that
> timestamps are handled across timezones with the integrity that rsync

exact filesize should be enough, no?



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-09 Thread Udo Weber

Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> Udo Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Hi Guillaume,
>
> Hi and thanks for testing the new stuff :-).
>
>
> > I have the same prob.
> > In the past I have installed cooker x times with success.
> > What exactly is expected at the prompt
> > "Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Installation"
> > (a) Directory
> > (a) ?
> >
> > I have the cooker-tree on /cooker (all latest mirrored) on a dos-partition
> > it contains /cooker/boot , /cooker/mandrake/base, /cooker/Mandrake/RPMS
> > -> something missing ? or is there something wrong  with Mandrake/base ?
>
> Basically, answers "cooker", "/cooker", and "/cooker/" should work. I have
> tested on a vfat partition (up until DiskDrake ate my windows partition a
> couple of days ago) and it seemed to work properly..
>
>
> > I tryed several combinations, in my mind I should say
> > /cooker
> > but this don't works for me !
> > " > Error! I can't find the Linux-Mandrake Installation in the specified
> > directory. "
> > Any suggestions ?
>
> I test the existence of "Mandrake/mdkinst" relatively to the location you
> point. Are you sure that "partition:/cooker/Mandrake/mdkinst" exists?
>
> Basically if the message is not "Directory could not be found on
> partition", it's very likely that "Mandrake/mdkinst" does not exist.
> It successfully accessed the specified directory.
>
> [If you can try a network boot (you need grub-compiled-with-your-netcard,
> a dhcp server and a tftp server) you can try out my initrd with sash in
> order to visit the appropriate directories]
>
> --
> Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Hi,
I can't install over network because Tokenring and Thinkpad is not supported
in the plain installation-subtree (each Thinkpad-type has different settings
for the ibmtr_cs).

Anyway until now I always installed the cooker from a mirrored HD-partition
but this don't works anymore.
Until now I always needed only the following directorys for successful install:

Mandrake/RPMS and Mandrake/base
Is it true that I need now also Mandrake/mdkinst ? What is the purpose of the
Mandrake/base/mdkinst_stage2.gz ?

Udo





Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread Ron Stodden

Pixel wrote:
> 
> it should be fixed now. at least with
> 
> Mandrake/base:
> -rw-r--r--   1 root root 11859052 Jan  6 22:22 mdkinst_stage2.gz

We need the GMT offset of this date/time and an assurance that
timestamps are handled across timezones with the integrity that rsync
uses during the developer-reference machine-primary mirror- mirrors
process.

For example, I am in GMT+1100 and I see (Konqueror):

Mandrake/base:

[ron@small base]$ ls -l mdkinst_stage2.gz 
-rw-r--r--1 ron  ron  11859052 Jan  7 08:22
mdkinst_stage2.gz

This shows a +10 hour time difference.  The size and 22 minutes in
both cases looks encouraging. 

Your email is GMT+1, so if that is also the tz of your reference
mirror, all is explained.

But the KDE2.1 Konqueror Properties on it shows a size of 12,936,351
???  

I believe what the command line says!

Interestingly, the KDE panel Show Desktop button leaves this
Properties dialog showing - KDE2 is certainly not quite there yet ...

However, today's cooker rsync download shows:

-rw-r--r--1 ron  ron  11910195 Jan  9 05:21
mdkinst_stage2.gz 

Summary:

After losing my Windows partition at the last Cooker install I
attempted, I am not inclined to try another Cooker install until I
receive multiple trusted assurances that such things will not happen
again.

-- 
Regards,

Ron. [AU]




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > "Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Installation"
> 
> "Please enter the directory containing the 
> Linux-Mandrake (Install) Distribution"

Okay, I use now:


Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Distribution.




-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread stephen


> "Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Installation"

"Please enter the directory containing the 
Linux-Mandrake (Install) Distribution"

srp




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Udo Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> Hi Guillaume,

Hi and thanks for testing the new stuff :-).

 
> I have the same prob.
> In the past I have installed cooker x times with success.
> What exactly is expected at the prompt
> "Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Installation"
> (a) Directory
> (a) ?
> 
> I have the cooker-tree on /cooker (all latest mirrored) on a dos-partition
> it contains /cooker/boot , /cooker/mandrake/base, /cooker/Mandrake/RPMS
> -> something missing ? or is there something wrong  with Mandrake/base ?

Basically, answers "cooker", "/cooker", and "/cooker/" should work. I have
tested on a vfat partition (up until DiskDrake ate my windows partition a
couple of days ago) and it seemed to work properly..

 
> I tryed several combinations, in my mind I should say
> /cooker
> but this don't works for me !
> " > Error! I can't find the Linux-Mandrake Installation in the specified
> directory. "
> Any suggestions ?

I test the existence of "Mandrake/mdkinst" relatively to the location you
point. Are you sure that "partition:/cooker/Mandrake/mdkinst" exists?

Basically if the message is not "Directory could not be found on
partition", it's very likely that "Mandrake/mdkinst" does not exist.
It successfully accessed the specified directory.



[If you can try a network boot (you need grub-compiled-with-your-netcard,
a dhcp server and a tftp server) you can try out my initrd with sash in
order to visit the appropriate directories]


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread Udo Weber

Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, Pixel wrote:
> >
> > > it should be fixed now. at least with
> > >
> > > Mandrake/base:
> > > -rw-r--r--   1 root root 11859052 Jan  6 22:22 mdkinst_stage2.gz
> >
> > yes...that working fine now, with one tiny drawback...when it asks what hd
> > and then what partition one wishes to use for the installation, it is not
> > entirely clear that it is asking where one wishes to install from rather than
> > to...a minor point, but one that could cause confusion...
>
> Oh, I guess this one is for me -- you mean you used the newest "hd.img"
> which did not use newt but text only, right?
>
> If that's the case, you talk about the message, which is:
>
> "Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Installation"
>
> I find this message clear -- but what do you suggest to make it clearer?
>
> --
> Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Hi Guillaume,

I have the same prob.
In the past I have installed cooker x times with success.
What exactly is expected at the prompt
"Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Installation"
(a) Directory
(a) ?

I have the cooker-tree on /cooker (all latest mirrored) on a dos-partition
it contains /cooker/boot , /cooker/mandrake/base, /cooker/Mandrake/RPMS
-> something missing ? or is there something wrong  with Mandrake/base ?

I tryed several combinations, in my mind I should say
/cooker
but this don't works for me !
" > Error! I can't find the Linux-Mandrake Installation in the specified
directory. "
Any suggestions ?

Thx Udo



Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, Pixel wrote:
> 
> > it should be fixed now. at least with
> >
> > Mandrake/base:
> > -rw-r--r--   1 root root 11859052 Jan  6 22:22 mdkinst_stage2.gz
> 
> yes...that working fine now, with one tiny drawback...when it asks what hd 
> and then what partition one wishes to use for the installation, it is not 
> entirely clear that it is asking where one wishes to install from rather than 
> to...a minor point, but one that could cause confusion...

Oh, I guess this one is for me -- you mean you used the newest "hd.img"
which did not use newt but text only, right?


If that's the case, you talk about the message, which is:

"Please enter the directory containing the Linux-Mandrake Installation"

I find this message clear -- but what do you suggest to make it clearer?



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread frank

On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, Pixel wrote:

> it should be fixed now. at least with
>
> Mandrake/base:
> -rw-r--r--   1 root root 11859052 Jan  6 22:22 mdkinst_stage2.gz

yes...that working fine now, with one tiny drawback...when it asks what hd 
and then what partition one wishes to use for the installation, it is not 
entirely clear that it is asking where one wishes to install from rather than 
to...a minor point, but one that could cause confusion...

frank




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-08 Thread Pixel

Salane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> any hope yet for this to be fixed 
> 2001-01-07 

it should be fixed now. at least with

Mandrake/base:
-rw-r--r--   1 root root 11859052 Jan  6 22:22 mdkinst_stage2.gz

[...]

> > > After formatting partitions, the install program gives the error message:
> > >
> > >An error occurred
> > > mount failed: no such device




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-07 Thread Salane

any hope yet for this to be fixed 
2001-01-07 


On Wednesday 03 January 2001 08:25 am, you wrote:
> "Thomas M. Beaudry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My local copy of cooker is up-to-date as of 3 Jan., 2001 1130UTC.
> >
> > After formatting partitions, the install program gives the error message:
> >
> >An error occurred
> > mount failed: no such device
>
> still need fixed :-(
>
> i'm kind of half-waiting the new stage1, but ok, i'll try to upload
> something that works...

-- 
Salane




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (andre) writes:


[...]

> If this is the case (that installing is a good way to remove windows)
> wouldn't it be advisable to say something like this in the
> installation-program. Something like don't do this, it can't be done,
> use instead 7.2 and upgrade that to full cooker status

No because it's a bug, not a feature! :-), I mean, it's not meant to
last..


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




RE: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Mike & Tracy Holt



> > > yes...cooker is rather useless if it cannot be installed for
> testing...hope
> > > this one is a priority item...
> >
> > Actually, some internal changes are processed currently, you
> can count the
> > merge of customized and expert modes with creation of
> "advanced" versions
> > of many single items and kernel-2.4 ; so priority currently is not heavy
> > testing but, let's say, "developping"..
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> >
> >
> If this is the case (that installing is a good way to remove
> windows) wouldn't it be advisable to say something like this in
> the installation-program. Something like don't do this, it can't
> be done, use instead 7.2 and upgrade that to full cooker status


Well that would also be a problem since 7.2 and cooker are incompatible.





Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread andre

> 
> frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 05 Jan 2001, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote:
> > 
> > > Me too!  I also lost my existing linux partitions trying to use the hd.img
> > > to install - any chance of seeing a fix this weekend?  I'm dying to check
> > > out cooker but just can't figure out how to get it installed
> > 
> > yes...cooker is rather useless if it cannot be installed for testing...hope 
> > this one is a priority item...
> 
> Actually, some internal changes are processed currently, you can count the
> merge of customized and expert modes with creation of "advanced" versions
> of many single items and kernel-2.4 ; so priority currently is not heavy
> testing but, let's say, "developping"..
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> 
> 
If this is the case (that installing is a good way to remove windows) wouldn't it be 
advisable to say something like this in the installation-program. Something like don't 
do this, it can't be done, use instead 7.2 and upgrade that to full cooker status




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread andre

> 
> 
> > You could do a rpm -ivh --root /cooker install. Only problem is
> > the installation-image does do some magic things like making a
> > rpm-datebase.
> 
> 
> Hello Andre,
> 
> Ahh... tell me more!  Question ~ could I just do rpm --rebuilddb (I think
> that's the syntax?) after the one you suggest above and all things would
> then be fixed?  It sounds too simple, would it work?
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
Sadly, i don't think so. cooker-rpms are for rpm-4 and 7.2-rpms are rpm-3 and 
rpm-4 are not forwards compatiable with the rpm-3 program. You could build rpm-4 
from source for 7.2(do i wouldn't upgrade rpm-3, Beter is to install it in your 
home-dir and run it from there). Secondly i think you have to do some foo for you can 
do a rpm --root /cooker --initdb and last i think that you have to do it in a curtain 
order but i'm not sure about that.  




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Fri, 05 Jan 2001, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote:
> 
> > Me too!  I also lost my existing linux partitions trying to use the hd.img
> > to install - any chance of seeing a fix this weekend?  I'm dying to check
> > out cooker but just can't figure out how to get it installed
> 
> yes...cooker is rather useless if it cannot be installed for testing...hope 
> this one is a priority item...

Actually, some internal changes are processed currently, you can count the
merge of customized and expert modes with creation of "advanced" versions
of many single items and kernel-2.4 ; so priority currently is not heavy
testing but, let's say, "developping"..



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




RE: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Mike & Tracy Holt


> You could do a rpm -ivh --root /cooker install. Only problem is
> the installation-image does do some magic things like making a
> rpm-datebase.


Hello Andre,

Ahh... tell me more!  Question ~ could I just do rpm --rebuilddb (I think
that's the syntax?) after the one you suggest above and all things would
then be fixed?  It sounds too simple, would it work?

Mike





Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread frank

On Fri, 05 Jan 2001, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote:

> Me too!  I also lost my existing linux partitions trying to use the hd.img
> to install - any chance of seeing a fix this weekend?  I'm dying to check
> out cooker but just can't figure out how to get it installed

yes...cooker is rather useless if it cannot be installed for testing...hope 
this one is a priority item...

frank




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread andre

> 
> > > > I did loose a windows partition thanks to the cooker
> > installer yesterday.
> > > >
> > > > Be careful.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> > >
> > > Me too!  I also lost my existing linux partitions trying to use
> > the hd.img
> > > to install - any chance of seeing a fix this weekend?  I'm
> > dying to check
> > > out cooker but just can't figure out how to get it installed
> >
> > Basically it should be possible if you don't have any windows (vfat)
> > partitions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> 
> 
> When I run the hd.img, I get up to the point where it asks me where the
> Mandrake/base and /RPMS are located then after I enter the info, it says
> something to the effect:  "no cooker tree found" or something like that.  I
> then enter the info again and it says "mount failed; no such device".  When
> I try to boot back into Linux - I can't get in.  I've already lost the
> windows partition and didn't want to mess with reinstalling it so I've made
> subsequent tries after loading only Linux.  With the time it takes to
> reinstall, I'm afraid to try again.  I've tried using the script on your
> site for making two iso images but end up with the install iso image that's
> 636MB and the 'ext' cd being 766MB (a little too big).  When trying to boot
> from the cdrom, the installer hangs on not being able to find a driver for
> the cdrom and won't except any of the options given and after reboot, leaves
> me (again) with an unuseable system.
> 
> Anyway, I've been stumped ~ I can't seem to think of ANY way to get cooker
> loaded, I've failed every time.
> 
> Thanks, Mike
> 
> 
> 
You could do a rpm -ivh --root /cooker install. Only problem is the installation-image 
does do some magic things like making a rpm-datebase.




RE: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Mike & Tracy Holt

> > > I did loose a windows partition thanks to the cooker
> installer yesterday.
> > >
> > > Be careful.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> >
> > Me too!  I also lost my existing linux partitions trying to use
> the hd.img
> > to install - any chance of seeing a fix this weekend?  I'm
> dying to check
> > out cooker but just can't figure out how to get it installed
>
> Basically it should be possible if you don't have any windows (vfat)
> partitions.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/


When I run the hd.img, I get up to the point where it asks me where the
Mandrake/base and /RPMS are located then after I enter the info, it says
something to the effect:  "no cooker tree found" or something like that.  I
then enter the info again and it says "mount failed; no such device".  When
I try to boot back into Linux - I can't get in.  I've already lost the
windows partition and didn't want to mess with reinstalling it so I've made
subsequent tries after loading only Linux.  With the time it takes to
reinstall, I'm afraid to try again.  I've tried using the script on your
site for making two iso images but end up with the install iso image that's
636MB and the 'ext' cd being 766MB (a little too big).  When trying to boot
from the cdrom, the installer hangs on not being able to find a driver for
the cdrom and won't except any of the options given and after reboot, leaves
me (again) with an unuseable system.

Anyway, I've been stumped ~ I can't seem to think of ANY way to get cooker
loaded, I've failed every time.

Thanks, Mike





Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

"Mike & Tracy Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > I did loose a windows partition thanks to the cooker installer yesterday.
> >
> > Be careful.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
> 
> Me too!  I also lost my existing linux partitions trying to use the hd.img
> to install - any chance of seeing a fix this weekend?  I'm dying to check
> out cooker but just can't figure out how to get it installed

Basically it should be possible if you don't have any windows (vfat)
partitions.




-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




RE: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Mike & Tracy Holt

> I did loose a windows partition thanks to the cooker installer yesterday.
>
> Be careful.
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Me too!  I also lost my existing linux partitions trying to use the hd.img
to install - any chance of seeing a fix this weekend?  I'm dying to check
out cooker but just can't figure out how to get it installed

Thanks, Mike





Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

"Thomas M. Beaudry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > > My local copy of cooker is up-to-date as of 3 Jan., 2001 1130UTC.
> > >
> > > After formatting partitions, the install program gives the error message:
> > >
> > >An error occurred
> > > mount failed: no such device
> >
> > still need fixed :-(
> >
> > i'm kind of half-waiting the new stage1, but ok, i'll try to upload
> > something that works...
> 
> Still not working as of 05 Jan., 2001 0610UTC.  Any idea when there may be a 
> fix?  Or at least a work-around?
> 
> Also, why was the install program attempting to mount the Windows partions?  
> This makes me a bit nervous with the reports here of disappearing Windows 
> partions.

I did loose a windows partition thanks to the cooker installer yesterday.

Be careful.


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-04 Thread Thomas M. Beaudry


> > My local copy of cooker is up-to-date as of 3 Jan., 2001 1130UTC.
> >
> > After formatting partitions, the install program gives the error message:
> >
> >An error occurred
> > mount failed: no such device
>
> still need fixed :-(
>
> i'm kind of half-waiting the new stage1, but ok, i'll try to upload
> something that works...

Still not working as of 05 Jan., 2001 0610UTC.  Any idea when there may be a 
fix?  Or at least a work-around?

Also, why was the install program attempting to mount the Windows partions?  
This makes me a bit nervous with the reports here of disappearing Windows 
partions.

Thanks.

-- 

Thomas M. Beaudry - k8la/ys1ztm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

File not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N)





Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-03 Thread Pixel

"Thomas M. Beaudry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> My local copy of cooker is up-to-date as of 3 Jan., 2001 1130UTC.
> 
> After formatting partitions, the install program gives the error message:
> 
>An error occurred
> mount failed: no such device

still need fixed :-(

i'm kind of half-waiting the new stage1, but ok, i'll try to upload something
that works...




[Cooker] Cooker Install Failure

2001-01-03 Thread Thomas M. Beaudry

My local copy of cooker is up-to-date as of 3 Jan., 2001 1130UTC.

After formatting partitions, the install program gives the error message:

   An error occurred
mount failed: no such device

and returns to the partitioning screen.  A check of VT3 shows a failure to 
load module VFAT and an error on the attempt to mount the Windows partition.  
(BTW:  why does the install program even need to mount the Windows 
partition???)

-- 

Thomas M. Beaudry - k8la/ys1ztm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Never trust a computer you can't lift. - Stan Masor





Re: [Cooker] install failure....

2000-09-19 Thread Pixel

Ruairi Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> 
> Secondly, to get around this I'm copying the cooker files to a vfat partition
> and trying to install from there... I get as far as partitioning the
> drive...sdb, and after partition I get a mount failure, and sdb1 is stuck
> mounted...and I can't get any further... the machine is a dell  workstation
> 410 with Adaptec aic29.. 
> 
> here is a copy of the output from bug...

thanks for the debug output. I've found a pb in it. Should be fixed now :)
(until i break it again :-/)




Re: [Cooker] install failure....

2000-09-18 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Ruairi Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> --NetAddressPart-00--=_RaD42576S614d250a86
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Hi,
>I've 1 question..and a possible bug report
> 
> First off, I want to do a hd install fro a reiserfs partition... how can
> I add the reiserfs.o module to the hd.img boot floppy ?

currently, there is not enough room on the floppy for that.

use el-torito 2.88 with `all.img', there is everything including
reiserfs.o; you'll probably have to burn a CD with it..


or else, you can use the network-boot feature [for example through grub]
and then you can put everything you want on the network machine you'll
boot from. [this feature is highly unsupported by us, although we're using
it for development]



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




[Cooker] install failure....

2000-09-17 Thread Ruairi Hickey

Hi,
   I've 1 question..and a possible bug report

First off, I want to do a hd install fro a reiserfs partition... how can I add
the reiserfs.o module to the hd.img boot floppy ?

Secondly, to get around this I'm copying the cooker files to a vfat partition
and trying to install from there... I get as far as partitioning the
drive...sdb, and after partition I get a mount failure, and sdb1 is stuck
mounted...and I can't get any further... the machine is a dell  workstation
410 with Adaptec aic29.. 

here is a copy of the output from bug...

Thanks,
   Ruairi



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1




* lspci

 Intel Corporation|440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (unknown ignore)
 Intel Corporation|440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX AGP bridge (unknown ignore)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 ISA (unknown unknown)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 IDE (STORAGE_IDE unknown)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 USB (SERIAL_USB usb-uhci)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 ACPI (unknown unknown)
 Texas Instruments|TSB12LV23 OHCI Compliant IEEE-1394 Controller (SERIAL_FIREWIRE 
unknown)
 3Com Corporation|3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (NETWORK_ETHERNET 3c59x)
 DEC|DECchip 21152 (unknown tulip)
 nVidia Corporation|Riva TNT2 (DISPLAY_VGA Card:RIVA TNT2)
 Adaptec|AHA-2940U2/W / 7890 (STORAGE_SCSI aic7xxx)
 Adaptec|AIC-7880U (STORAGE_SCSI aic7xxx)


* pci_devices

808671900   ec08

0008808671910   

0038808671100   

0039808671110   
ffa1
003a80867112e   
ece1
003b808671130   

0070104c8019b   fe004000fe00

008810b79055e   ec01fe004800
f900
0098101100240   

010010de0028a   fc00f408
8000
02509005001ff   fc01fafff004
fb00
027090048078f   f801faffe000
fb00


* fdisk


Disk /dev/sda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 554 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   * 1   554   4449973+   b  Win95 FAT32

Disk /dev/sdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1106 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1   * 131248976   82  Linux swap
/dev/sdb232  1106   8634937+   5  Extended
/dev/sdb53269305203+  83  Linux
/dev/sdb670   451   3068383+  83  Linux
/dev/sdb7   452  1106   5261256   83  Linux


* scsi

Attached devices: 
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
  Vendor: QUANTUM  Model: VIKING II 4.5WLS Rev: 3506
  Type:   Direct-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
  Vendor: SEAGATE  Model: ST39102LWRev: 0004
  Type:   Direct-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
  Vendor: NEC  Model: CD-ROM DRIVE:465 Rev: 1.03
  Type:   CD-ROM   ANSI SCSI revision: 02

*