Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- Nessie, June and Prudy, It has always been my understanding that "Caveat Lector" was there for a reason before each post and that a person could post something and not expect to be attacked personally because of the content of the post. If an articel calls somebody a name that is not the same as the person who posted it doing so, unless they are also the author of the article. So everybody endorese every article they post 100% or issue an elaborate explanation. It was posted before that this was not necessary and wasted bandwidth which I understand is paid for by Kris and not you three tyrants. That is just not so because some people post articles on both sides of an issue like Mike Spritzer. And it is very impractical because a person might endorse paragraphs 3, 5 and 7 but not 2 and 4. What you say is not true or maybe you expect me to say you speak with forked tongue. I can change my name if you do not like it. It was changed twice for me already by people just like you, once when I started to school and again to give me an anglo name. My anglo name is Abbey. I hate it. But this time I think I will cahnge it to Prudy June. Anglo names are better, aren't they? Obviously, to me anyway, I meant my grandmother named me before she died but she is dead now and cannot be contacted, except spiritually, to ask her why she did such an awful thing. She died on the res in North Carolina in the luxury accommodations there also provided by good people just like you. Heat would have been nice, but beggars cannot be choosers, can they. And you know best how to deal with people like us. We are very ignorant and you are wise. We are band and you are good. As for you, June, telling me to get a skin (scalp) on ebay, you are just too funny for words and your ethnic slur is not wasted on me. I wonder why posting an article containing an ethnic or racial slur written by somebody else (and containing other more important information)is so evil but yours to me is not. Well, on this list that all depends on who is doing the slurring. And more importantly which ethnic group is being slurred. As for having thick skins, that is not necessarily a virtue. Many people with thick skins have them because they are crass and insensitive. I have watched you people hound others away like Eagle 1 and I wonder just what you are so afraid of. You cannot tolerate people who do not agree with you. And for your edification, June, the People of the Hills North American Natives did not traditionally take scalps any more than your own ancestors probably did. Please give me your source for that implication. I would be fascinated to read this version of history as I have always been with regard to North American Natives. Maybe you and Prudy and Nessie could go to ebay yourselves and get something to make you less hypercritical and some manners and a new decency as yours is seriously flawed. None of you contribute very much to this list yet you seem to think you are free to insult every poster you do not like and usually operate as a wolf pack does. Anybody who does not like your abuse can get out and don't let the door hit them in the ass, etc. I know the drill. I have been dealing with drills from people like you my entire life but I am still here. Nessie, you in your blind rage have failed to notice that nobody is or has threatened you or your imaginary friends who are being threatened. My friends and I feel the very same way about somebody who lies about us as you did me. If you are ever in North Carolina, I would like to personally invite you to stop by for a visit. And I fully understand how you do not want people like me wasting "your"air or taking up "your' space. We have our own and should stay within it. I understand and am only "out" to go to school. So anybody on the list who, as Nessie assures me, thinks because an article I posted called somebody a name means that I, too, did that, I want to hear from you, too. Please post. At leat contact me off list. I will read all future posts with an eye that the poster endorses, condones and is a very strong advocate of whatever they post. This changes the meaning of the entire list. Insteada of a source of information, it is merely a soapbox for each person to post their own views and opinions and things they advocate. So we must all keep that in mind and post only those causes which we are willing to die for. That should eliminate lots of posts and leave everything wide open for these three. PrudyJune (Formerly Kindred Spirit) --- Nessie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > >If it "appars to ALL THE WORLD" that I have called > somebody a "coon" > why did no one else attack me? > > > I got there first. The other people were apparently > polite enough not to > waste bandwidth with a bunch of dittos. > > > > > > >you, NESSIE are a LIAR. I did not call anybody > anything. You, on the > other hand, called me stupid, repeatedly and a
Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- >If it "appars to ALL THE WORLD" that I have called somebody a "coon" why did no one else attack me? I got there first. The other people were apparently polite enough not to waste bandwidth with a bunch of dittos. >you, NESSIE are a LIAR. I did not call anybody anything. You, on the other hand, called me stupid, repeatedly and a fool and said I should not post here. Let me rephrase that. You SOUND stupid. Maybe youre not, but like the man said, If it quacks like a duck . . . >Then you threatened me with physical violence in how in person you would not be so polite. That was not directed at only you. Thats a general statement. It applies to everyone. Insult to my face, me, or my friends, or anybody I respect, and Ill hurt you. I dont care who you are. I dont care how big you are. I dont care how many you are. Youre gonna get hurt. Maybe Ill get hurt, too. Maybe I wont. Either way, I dont care, and either way, youre gonna get hurt. Thats a fact. Thats how I live my life. If you dont like it, avoid insulting me in person, save your insults for a safe distance, like over the internet. Thats how cowards do it. . . >How dare you lie and say I said something I did not I said you appeared to call somebody a coon. Thats no lie. You did, in fact, do exactly that. >and threaten me, you little creep!! You know how big I am? Howd you manage that? >I assure you I am not one bit frightened by your threats and personal attacks. Ditto. Anybody elses either. >You prove every FBI agent is a liar and evil. I would think some are and some are not just like everybody else. I did prove it. Anybody who refuses to resign in disgust from an organization which murders innocent women and children in cold blood, is evil. Evil people lie. >It is unfortunate that you were hit by a car but that does NOT give you the right to call me names. I did not do it. You condoned its cause. >There are degrees and levels of misconduct and intoxication. Comparing an incident of DUI with no injuries is nothing like Manson where murders were committed. They didnt always kill. Sometimes they broke in and found nobody home. Same with drunk driving. It doesnt always result in death, but thats not the fault of the drunken driver. Its the fault of blind fate. >Some people have car wrecks and run others down without being under the influence of alcohol, too. Thats a separate issue. >Defending one is NOT defending ALL. Defending drunk driving is defending drunk driving. The numbers are irrelevant. >Driving while intoxicatd is wrong and I have stated that all along. Even in the case of G.W.? Is what he did wrong, yes or no? >I know a man who has driven home from a bar looped every night for forty years, however, without injuring another person other than himself. Blind luck. >Oh you are so sophistocated in your liberal views! Im not a liberal. Im an anarchist. I dislike liberals, and liberalism, intensely. For details, read my last column at SFBG.com: http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/33.html >Well, Clinton and Jackson both PROFESS to be Baptists and practice a religion that condemns adultry. Then they should not commit adultery. Never do anything your religion forbids. It generates cognitive dissonance. Do not, however, attempt to force the rest of us to practice your religion. That leads to social dissonance. Fifteen hundred years of bloody religious warfare is enough. >I'll bet his daughter was not at all embarassed by his actions! You would not have been and that is the measure by which you think the universe is gauged--the World According to Nessie. If it was my dad, Id be proud he was that old and still getting some. >DO NOT THREATEN ME AGAIN, EVER, NESSIE and do not bother to call me names, either. I didnt threaten you. I stated a fact. Anyone, yourself included, who insults me to my face, is gonna get hurt. Thats not a threat. Thats a fact of life, like weather or gravity. Get used to it. On the other hand, stuff you say from the safe distance of the internet, I dont mind at all. Au contrair. I take it as a compliment that you would devote so many keystrokes to me. Feel free to continue. Theres no such thing as bad publicity. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat
Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- Nessie, "FWD" just means "Forwarded" and is not a disclaimer and is automatic on most of the software I have ever used."FYI"has to at least be typed in. Now why would a person type that in if it did not mean something. It means something is just being sent along for informational value without judgment passed one way or another. If it "appars to ALL THE WORLD" that I have called somebody a "coon" why did no one else attack me? Becuase it is a LIE and you, NESSIE are a LIAR. I did not call anybody anything. You, on the other hand, called me stupid, repeatedly and a fool and said I should not post here. Then you threatened me with physical violence in how in person you would not be so polite. How dare you lie and say I said something I did not and threaten me, you little creep!! I assure you I am not one bit frightened by your threats and personal attacks. You should have said the ARTICle called somebody a "coon" and not me because I did not but I AM CALLING YOU, NESSIE, A LIAR because that is what you are and have just proven yourself to be. I suppose this is how you are always "civil." Remember a while back when Kris put the "Caveat Lector" back on every post? That was so assholes like you would not assume because a person posts something, they endorse it. Personal beliefs are just that and I have no intention of sharing mine with scum like you, Mr. Name-calling Liar. You prove every FBI agent is a liar and evil. I would think some are and some are not just like everybody else. It is unfortunate that you were hit by a car but that does NOT give you the right to call me names. I did not do it. There are degrees and levels of misconduct and intoxication. Comparing an incident of DUI with no injuries is nothing like Manson where murders were committed. Some people have car wrecks and run others down without being under the influence of alcohol, too. Defending one is NOT defending ALL. Driving while intoxicatd is wrong and I have stated that all along. I know a man who has driven home from a bar looped every night for forty years, however, without injuring another person other than himself. Oh you are so sophistocated in your liberal views! Well, Clinton and Jackson both PROFESS to be Baptists and practice a religion that condemns adultry. I'll bet his daughter was not at all embarassed by his actions! You would not have been and that is the measure by which you think the universe is gauged--the World According to Nessie. DO NOT THREATEN ME AGAIN, EVER, NESSIE and do not bother to call me names, either. I call you a liar only in response to your having lied about my post. In the future, delete anything I post and refrain from commenting, calling me names and threatening me. You are 'way out of line here and have no right to do so. This is some friendly advice you would do well to heed. Kindred Spirit --- Nessie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > >Most people acknowledge the "follies of youth." > > By that logic, we ought to turn the Manson gang > loose. After all, they > were pretty young at the time they killed those > people. > > > >Nobody cares about Clinton's sex life! > > That is patently false. He wouldnt have lied about > it if he hadnt been > asked, and he wouldnt have been asked if they > didnt care. > > You yourself care, and said so, because it happened > at the office. In > the same office, 365 days a year for eight years in > a row, he refused to > lift the blockade of Iraq. At least half a million > civilians > died,because of that, almost all of them women and > children. Why dont > you seem to care about that? > > > >It demonstrates lack of judgment and character and > was lying to a > federal grand jury. > > Lying to protect a womans reputation used to be > considered an honorable > thing to do. > > Lying to a federal grand jury, or to a federal > anything, is not only not > wrong, its a duty. The federal government is EVIL. > It murders innocent > women and children in cold blood. Doing anything > whatsoever to help it > in any way, especially telling it what it wants to > know, makes one an > accessory to its crimes. > > > >That is not the issue and not the complaint > although pretty shoddy > behavior for a married man, etc. > > That depends on the marriage. Many people practice > open marriage. Who > are you to tell other people how to practice their > marriage? > > Adulterers are apparently a big enough voting bloc > to elect a > president, especially when they combine with the > draft dodgers and pot > smokers. Were this not true, Clinton never would > have gotten elected in > the first place. > Together, adulterers, draft dodgers and pot smokers > are apparently the > majority in this country, and the rest of you would > do well to sit down, > shut up and quit hassling us before we get mad > enough to slap you down. > Go lead your own lives and leave us alone. Our > patience is running out. > > > > >And yes, I reali
Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- >Most people acknowledge the "follies of youth." By that logic, we ought to turn the Manson gang loose. After all, they were pretty young at the time they killed those people. >Nobody cares about Clinton's sex life! That is patently false. He wouldnt have lied about it if he hadnt been asked, and he wouldnt have been asked if they didnt care. You yourself care, and said so, because it happened at the office. In the same office, 365 days a year for eight years in a row, he refused to lift the blockade of Iraq. At least half a million civilians died,because of that, almost all of them women and children. Why dont you seem to care about that? >It demonstrates lack of judgment and character and was lying to a federal grand jury. Lying to protect a womans reputation used to be considered an honorable thing to do. Lying to a federal grand jury, or to a federal anything, is not only not wrong, its a duty. The federal government is EVIL. It murders innocent women and children in cold blood. Doing anything whatsoever to help it in any way, especially telling it what it wants to know, makes one an accessory to its crimes. >That is not the issue and not the complaint although pretty shoddy behavior for a married man, etc. That depends on the marriage. Many people practice open marriage. Who are you to tell other people how to practice their marriage? Adulterers are apparently a big enough voting bloc to elect a president, especially when they combine with the draft dodgers and pot smokers. Were this not true, Clinton never would have gotten elected in the first place. Together, adulterers, draft dodgers and pot smokers are apparently the majority in this country, and the rest of you would do well to sit down, shut up and quit hassling us before we get mad enough to slap you down. Go lead your own lives and leave us alone. Our patience is running out. >And yes, I realize others have "done it, too" but that does not make it a fine example of the exactly best behavior in his position, lying to grand juries aside. Thats true only to people who think sex is wrong. To the rest of us, it is perfectly fine behavior. If anything it made the guy more likable. It certainly didnt cancel out the half million murders, but it sure made him seem like a nicer person than those meddlesome prudes who attacked him for it. They are EVIL, if for no other reason than they distracted the public from his REAL crimes, the half million murders. People who try to tell others how to lead their sex lives are scum. They should die off and quit wasting air. >It was a very stupid thing for a person in his unique position to do period. With that, I agree. But that in no way justifies what was done to him over it. Sex is the SOLE business of the people involve. Its not your business, Its not my business. And it certainly isnt the governments business. Do you want the government telling YOU how to do it, or who to do it with? > So now Clinton is a perfect gentleman the epitome of gracious treatment of women, a model for all men to follow. I never said that. Dont put words in my mouth. Its rude. Its dishonest. Personally, I don't think he's a gentleman at all. I think he's a villian. OTOH, a whole lot of women sure do seem to like him a lot. There must be some reason. >YOU prove that he (Bush) endangered the lives of others and that there were other drivers even present at the time. He could have been basically alone on the road with the officer issuing the ticket. YOU prove he was beyond his personal tolerance of alcohol There was at least one other driver on the road, the cop. And Bush was too drunk to see him in time. Whoever else was there escaped with their lives by blind luck. > as some people are able to tolerate blood levels much higher than others. Prove that he is not one of these. ANY alcohol impairs the ability to drive. Science has proven this conclusively and repeatedly. There is NO excuse for driving with alcohol in your blood, not any, not ever. Im living proof. Thirty years ago a drunk driver ran off the road, ran me down, and drove off, leaving me to die in a ditch. It still hurts, every single day, every step I take. If in the unlikely event that fate ever puts him in my hands, I fully intend to hurt the man, and Im going to take my time doing it, too. When you defend drunk drivers, youre defending the guy who ran me down. Imagine how that makes me feel about you. Youre lucky Im as polite as I am. If you did it in person, I wouldn't be. >I conceded that AT THE TIME, driving under the influence of alcohol was not given the seriousness it deserved but you have to launch a personal attack, every time I post it seems, don't you? Look, you appeared for all the world to be calling somebody a coon. You DEFINITELY defended drunk driving. People like that dont deserve to be treated politely. You're getting of lightly. >Well,
Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 01/22/2001 7:45:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Driving while drinking at that time was not taken as seriously as it should have been but we should compare Clinton's youth to Bush's youth and NOT Clinton as an adult to Bush as a yo >> You're absolutely right. I lived in Georgia, and I must say, driving and drinking were not taken very seriously at all. They could be drunk as skunks and have amazing accidents. It was never taken seriously if one of their relatives was a big man around town. And in truth, Dubya stopped drinking when he was 40. That was Henry Hyde's age when he was having a youthful indiscretion. Republicans mature later than the average bear, don't they? Prudy http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- You seem to have a personal problem with me, Nessie, but I assure you that it is you and not I who looks foolish comparing the behavior of the Leader of the Free World, a middle-aged man, the Commander in Chief, with that of a kid 25 years ago who was basically a nobody at the time and quite young. Most people acknowledge the "follies of youth." Nobody cares about Clinton's sex life! You miss the point that this was done in the presidential office and followed by a series of lying. It demonstrates lack of judgment and character and was lying to a federal grand jury. Why do you want it to be about sex? That is not the issue and not the complaint although pretty shoddy behavior for a married man, etc. And yes, I realize others have "done it, too" but that does not make it a fine example of the exactly best behavior in his position, lying to grand juries aside. It was a very stupid thing for a person in his unique position to do period. So now Clinton is a perfect gentleman the epitome of gracious treatment of women, a model for all men to follow. YOU prove that he (Bush) endangered the lives of others and that there were other drivers even present at the time. He could have been basically alone on the road with the officer issuing the ticket. YOU prove he was beyond his personal tolerance of alcohol as some people are able to tolerate blood levels much higher than others. Prove that he is not one of these. I conceded that AT THE TIME, driving under the influence of alcohol was not given the seriousness it deserved but you have to launch a personal attack, every time I post it seems, don't you? Well, I take exception to your assertion that I am a fool, etc. Your own logic is often flawed and mere opinion. As for the charges against Clinton, I do not know if they were all covered in his deal or if we may yet see proof of some of these. At least the Bush episode is over and in the past and not ongoing. So I should not post because you do not like the content of my post. I will wait for Kris to inform me of that and not you. At least I am not violating the "always be civil" rule as you are, twice today just to me not counting others I may yet read. Get a grip, walk it off! This is not your list and others are allowed to post here unless the Listowner decides otherwise. Until then, kindly delete my posts as they seem to cause you great distress concerning my mental capabilities and state. I don't care a rip whether you think I am stupid (your previous post)or foolish or both. KS --- Nessie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:28:39 -0800 > Reply-to: Conspiracy Theory Research List > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Nessie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First > Act, > Bush Blocks Clinton Orders > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Caveat Lector- > > >Yet those wanting to detract from him act as though > this just happened > the way Clinton's sexcapades did. > > Apples and oranges. Bush endangered lives, maybe > yours, maybe mine, and > definitely his own. Clinton had sex. Nobody got > hurt from Clinton > having sex with Monica till the prudes butted in and > started squawking > about it. Then it distracted the attention of a tax > paid public official > and made it more difficult for him to do the job > that we the public had > paid him to do. So we got less work than we paid him > for. Ergo, the > people who impeached Clinton over his affair with > Monica were ripping us > off for our hard earned cash when they did it. They > did the harm, not > him and Monica having sex. Sex is not immoral. > Stealing from taxpayers > is immoral. If youre so concerned with the morals > of elected officials, > why arent you squawking about that? > > > >Rape is not serious? > > (1.) Rape is not sex. Rape is assault. > > (2.) He is ALLEGED to have raped somebody. G.W. Bush > is alleged to be a > shape shifting reptoid from outer space. Allegations > are allegations, > and nothing more. Talk is cheap. Prove he raped > somebody or shut up > about it. These unsubstantiated allegations are > getting very boring. > > > >Selling nuclear secrets to China is not serious? > > Again, that too is only alleged. Whats the matter, > do you think the > Chinese arent smart enough to come up with MIRV on > their own? This is > the culture came up with gun powder, the compass and > paper. Their > government aint much to look at, but their > scientists are top notch. > > Just because somebody alleges something, that > doesnt mean its true. > Youre may be too young to remember, but in the 50s > the ultra-right was > alleging that
Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- >Yet those wanting to detract from him act as though this just happened the way Clinton's sexcapades did. Apples and oranges. Bush endangered lives, maybe yours, maybe mine, and definitely his own. Clinton had sex. Nobody got hurt from Clinton having sex with Monica till the prudes butted in and started squawking about it. Then it distracted the attention of a tax paid public official and made it more difficult for him to do the job that we the public had paid him to do. So we got less work than we paid him for. Ergo, the people who impeached Clinton over his affair with Monica were ripping us off for our hard earned cash when they did it. They did the harm, not him and Monica having sex. Sex is not immoral. Stealing from taxpayers is immoral. If youre so concerned with the morals of elected officials, why arent you squawking about that? >Rape is not serious? (1.) Rape is not sex. Rape is assault. (2.) He is ALLEGED to have raped somebody. G.W. Bush is alleged to be a shape shifting reptoid from outer space. Allegations are allegations, and nothing more. Talk is cheap. Prove he raped somebody or shut up about it. These unsubstantiated allegations are getting very boring. >Selling nuclear secrets to China is not serious? Again, that too is only alleged. Whats the matter, do you think the Chinese arent smart enough to come up with MIRV on their own? This is the culture came up with gun powder, the compass and paper. Their government aint much to look at, but their scientists are top notch. Just because somebody alleges something, that doesnt mean its true. Youre may be too young to remember, but in the 50s the ultra-right was alleging that the President was a Communist agent. Ultra-rightists allege a lot of crap about people they dont like. Allegations are nothing but talk. Show proof or shut up about it. When you dont show proof, and you dont shut up either, you look like a fool. Is that want you really want to do? Do you WANT to look like a fool? If so, heres the space to do it. Go right ahead. Knock yourself out. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ctrl o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector- Why do we compare something Bush did when very young, a 25-30 year old event to Clinton's recent administration? Driving while drinking at that time was not taken as seriously as it should have been but we should compare Clinton's youth to Bush's youth and NOT Clinton as an adult to Bush as a youth. Of course, Clinton did not grow up and mature very much so maybe that is why this is done. Bush, on the other hand seems to have outgrown this particular problem. Yet those wanting to detract from him act as though this just happened the way Clinton's sexcapades did. Rape is not serious? Selling nuclear secrets to China is not serious? But what Bush did 25 years ago, AHA! Now that is relevant! Kindred --- T Nohava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:36:33 -0500 > Reply-to: Conspiracy Theory Research List > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: T Nohava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks > Clinton Orders > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Caveat Lector- > > >Get your priorities straight. > I've seen your posts here and your opinions...you > should get your morals > straight! I quite agree on the alcohol abuse issue > as a problem in this > country being a serious one, my question is after > all this time why are > alcoholic beverages not made illegal? I believe I > read a post on this list > a few years ago that stated one of Clinton's > encounters with Monica occurred > while Yasir Arafat was waiting patiently in the Rose > Garden. I would also > say the problems in the Middle East are still not > taken care of and are > considerably worse than they've been in years. As > far as his Job Impairment > is concerned, it seemed to be a perpetuating event. > Granted sex isn't evil, > your just changing the context of my message. It's > called morality, the same > morality Clinton professed during his first > campaign, remember Family > Values? Oil Company profits...not so much profits as > the citizenry > complaining about high energy prices and shortages, > or the Environmentalists > wanting oil exploration stopped in certain areas. > People bitch yet everybody > wants to drive that new SUV or 4x4 that keeps > sucking up all that gas. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Conspiracy Theory Research List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Nessie > > Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 1:37 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks > Clinton Orders > > > > > > -Caveat Lector- > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied > about it, he never > > brought it > > to the forefront, much like Clinton and his sexual > escapades (legacy). I > > wonder if he'll keep with recently created > tradition in the Whitehouse > > of > > having dignitaries wait while he has oral sex in > the most powerful > > office on > > the planet? > > > > He lied about it. It came out in the final weeks > of the campaign. > > > > Drunk driving and oral sex, or any kind of sex, > are equivalent only to a > > deranged mind. Drunk driving is like standing in a > crowded room, > > covering your eyes with one hand while firing a > pistol randomly around > > the room with the other hand. Even if, through > sheer luck, nobody gets > > hurt, it's still a heinous crime for which there > is no excuse. > > > > Sex, on the other hand, is nobodys business > except for the persons > > actually involved. A case could be made that if > doing it in the office > > somehow impaired Clintons ability to do his job, > that he shouldnt have > > done it there. This case has not been made. If > anything, it seems to > > have made him do his job more efficiently. What > impaired his ability to > > do his job was having to spend time defending > himself from this > > ridiculous charge. > > > > Whats more, Clinton killed at least a half a > million Iraqis, almost all > > of them women and children. Anybody who ignores > that and gets upset > > instead about his having had sex, is morally > skewed. Whats wrong with > > you, anyway? Cant you see evil when you look at > it? Sex isn't evil. > > Sex is Nature's WAY. Sex is a GOOD thing. If it > weren't for sex, you > > wouldn't even BE here. Killing women and children > so the oil companies > > can make greater profits is evil. Get your > priorities straight. > __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives
